首页 > 最新文献

European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy最新文献

英文 中文
Association of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists with risk of gastrointestinal adverse events: evidence from a drug target Mendelian randomization. 胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与胃肠道不良事件风险的关联:来自药物靶孟德尔随机化的证据。
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf065
Haozhang Huang, Jin Liu, Xiaozhao Lu, Ning Tan, Yong Liu

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are a novel class of medications promising for treating cardiovascular disease or obesity, while concerns regarding their potential gastrointestinal adverse events persist. In our study, we report that genetically proxied GLP-1RAs may increase risk of acute pancreatitis but not other gastrointestinal adverse events.

胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)是一类有望治疗心血管疾病或肥胖的新型药物,但对其潜在胃肠道不良事件的担忧仍然存在。在我们的研究中,我们报告了遗传代理GLP-1RAs可能会增加急性胰腺炎的风险,但不会增加其他胃肠道不良事件的风险。
{"title":"Association of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists with risk of gastrointestinal adverse events: evidence from a drug target Mendelian randomization.","authors":"Haozhang Huang, Jin Liu, Xiaozhao Lu, Ning Tan, Yong Liu","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf065","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are a novel class of medications promising for treating cardiovascular disease or obesity, while concerns regarding their potential gastrointestinal adverse events persist. In our study, we report that genetically proxied GLP-1RAs may increase risk of acute pancreatitis but not other gastrointestinal adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"35-37"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12862966/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144947636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diuretic strategies in acute heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. 急性心力衰竭的利尿策略:随机临床试验的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf067
Antonio Cannatà, Gianluca Anastasia, Vincenzo De Marzo, Oren Caspi, Daniel Bromage, Italo Porto, Gianluigi Savarese, Theresa McDonagh, Zachary L Cox, Pietro Ameri

Aims: Several diuretic strategies, including furosemide i.v. boluses (FB) or continuous infusion (FC), are used in acute heart failure (AHF).

Methods and results: We systematically searched phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating diuretic regimens in admitted AHF patients within 48 h and irrespective of clinical stabilization. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) of FC or FB plus another diuretic (sequential nephron blockade, SNB) compared to FB alone on 24 h weight loss (WL) and worsening renal function (WRF), with a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. Urine output, hypokalaemia, hyponatremia, and all-cause mortality/rehospitalization were secondary endpoints. In 25 selected RCTs (7149 patients, mean age 68.9 ± 8.7 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 38.2 ± 10.7%), FC [OR 1.55 (95% confidence interval 1.39-1.63)], FB plus tolvaptan [OR 1.57 (1.39-1.77)], FB plus SGLT2i [OR 1.23 (1.06-1.42)], and FB plus thiazide [OR 1.63 (1.37-1.94)] were associated with greater WL than FB. FB plus SGLT2i [OR 1.52 (1.19-1.94)] and FB plus acetazolamide [OR 1.81 (1.31-2.49)] were associated with WRF. FB plus thiazide was associated with both WRF [OR 1.78 (1.43-2.21)] and hypokalaemia [OR 1.69 (1.32-2.16)]. Results were consistent in sensitivity analyses considering urine output, RCTs protocol-established furosemide doses, or daily furosemide dose. Congestion/decongestion scores and clinical outcomes were reported in around 50% of RCTs. In an underpowered exploratory analysis, mortality/rehospitalization was non-significantly lower with SGLT2i [OR 0.45 (0.19-1.07)].

Conclusion: FC and SNB improve surrogates of response to FB in AHF. SNB is also connoted by WRF and may induce hypokalaemia. The endpoints of diuretic RCTs should be revised and harmonized.

目的:几种利尿策略,包括速尿静脉注射(FB)或持续输注(FC),用于急性心力衰竭(AHF)。方法和结果:我们系统地检索了3期随机临床试验(rct),这些试验评估了住院AHF患者48小时内的利尿剂方案,而不考虑临床稳定情况。我们计算了与单独使用FB相比,FC或FB联合另一种利尿剂(序贯肾元阻断剂,SNB)在24小时体重减轻(WL)和肾功能恶化(WRF)方面的比值比(OR),采用随机效应模型,方差加权为负。尿量、低钾血症、低钠血症和全因死亡率/再住院是次要终点。在所选择的25项随机对照试验(7149例患者,平均年龄68.9±8.7岁,平均LVEF 38.2±10.7%)中,FC (OR 1.55[95%可信区间1.39-1.63],FB联合托伐普坦(OR 1.57 [1.39-1.77]), FB联合SGLT2i (OR 1.23[1.06-1.42])和FB联合噻嗪(OR 1.63[1.37-1.94])与WL的相关性大于FB。FB + SGLT2i (OR为1.52[1.19-1.94])和FB +乙酰唑胺(OR为1.81[1.31-2.49])与WRF相关。FB加噻嗪与WRF (OR为1.78[1.43-2.21])和低钾血症(OR为1.69[1.32-2.16])相关。考虑尿量、随机对照试验方案建立的呋塞米剂量或每日呋塞米剂量的敏感性分析结果是一致的。大约50%的随机对照试验报告了拥堵/去拥堵评分和临床结果。在一项不足的探索性分析中,SGLT2i患者的死亡率/再住院率无显著性降低(OR 0.45[0.19-1.07])。结论:FC和SNB可改善AHF患者对FB的应答。SNB也包含在WRF中,可能导致低钾血症。利尿剂随机对照试验的终点应该修订和统一。
{"title":"Diuretic strategies in acute heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.","authors":"Antonio Cannatà, Gianluca Anastasia, Vincenzo De Marzo, Oren Caspi, Daniel Bromage, Italo Porto, Gianluigi Savarese, Theresa McDonagh, Zachary L Cox, Pietro Ameri","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf067","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf067","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Several diuretic strategies, including furosemide i.v. boluses (FB) or continuous infusion (FC), are used in acute heart failure (AHF).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We systematically searched phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating diuretic regimens in admitted AHF patients within 48 h and irrespective of clinical stabilization. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) of FC or FB plus another diuretic (sequential nephron blockade, SNB) compared to FB alone on 24 h weight loss (WL) and worsening renal function (WRF), with a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. Urine output, hypokalaemia, hyponatremia, and all-cause mortality/rehospitalization were secondary endpoints. In 25 selected RCTs (7149 patients, mean age 68.9 ± 8.7 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 38.2 ± 10.7%), FC [OR 1.55 (95% confidence interval 1.39-1.63)], FB plus tolvaptan [OR 1.57 (1.39-1.77)], FB plus SGLT2i [OR 1.23 (1.06-1.42)], and FB plus thiazide [OR 1.63 (1.37-1.94)] were associated with greater WL than FB. FB plus SGLT2i [OR 1.52 (1.19-1.94)] and FB plus acetazolamide [OR 1.81 (1.31-2.49)] were associated with WRF. FB plus thiazide was associated with both WRF [OR 1.78 (1.43-2.21)] and hypokalaemia [OR 1.69 (1.32-2.16)]. Results were consistent in sensitivity analyses considering urine output, RCTs protocol-established furosemide doses, or daily furosemide dose. Congestion/decongestion scores and clinical outcomes were reported in around 50% of RCTs. In an underpowered exploratory analysis, mortality/rehospitalization was non-significantly lower with SGLT2i [OR 0.45 (0.19-1.07)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FC and SNB improve surrogates of response to FB in AHF. SNB is also connoted by WRF and may induce hypokalaemia. The endpoints of diuretic RCTs should be revised and harmonized.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"6-14"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12862974/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145033039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
OCEAN trial: rethinking long-term anticoagulation after atrial fibrillation ablation. OCEAN试验:房颤消融后长期抗凝治疗的再思考。
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf084
Mattia Galli, Beatrice Simeone, Sebastiano Sciarretta
{"title":"OCEAN trial: rethinking long-term anticoagulation after atrial fibrillation ablation.","authors":"Mattia Galli, Beatrice Simeone, Sebastiano Sciarretta","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf084","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf084","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"4-5"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12862968/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145741700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Net Clinical Benefit of Extended Dual Pathway Inhibition in Chronic Coronary Syndrome as Classified by the 2024 ESC Criteria: a COMPASS Substudy. 2024 ESC标准分类的慢性冠状动脉综合征扩展双途径抑制的净临床获益:COMPASS亚研究
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag008
Morten Würtz, Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen, Qilong Yi, John W Eikelboom, Michael Maeng

Background and aims: Extended dual pathway inhibition (DPI) with aspirin and rivaroxaban is recommended in high-risk patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). In the 2024 update of the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on CCS, the high-risk criteria were revised. In the COMPASS cohort, we evaluated net clinical benefit of DPI according to baseline risk as defined by the ESC criteria in CCS patients.

Methods: CCS patients randomized to aspirin alone or DPI (n=15,429) were risk stratified using the 2024 ESC criteria. Endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause death, fatal/critical organ bleeding, and composite adverse events (MACE and bleeding). Net clinical benefit was the 30-month absolute risk difference combining MACE and bleeding.

Results: High-risk status was associated with higher 30-month incidences of MACE (6.4% vs. 5.0%, HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.09-1.63) and composite adverse events (7.1% vs. 5.7%, HR 1.31 [1.09-1.58]), but not all-cause death or bleeding. DPI reduced MACE (low-risk: HR 0.66 [0.45-0.95]; high-risk: HR 0.77 [0.66.-0.91]; p-value for interaction 0.42) and all-cause death (low-risk: 0.78 [0.53-1.14]; high-risk: HR 0.78 [0.64-0.94], p-value for interaction 0.99). DPI provided similar net clinical benefit in low-risk (30-month risk difference -1.77% [-3.88-0.33], HR 0.79 [0.56-1.11]) and high-risk patients (30-month risk difference -2.06% [-3.20--0.91], HR 0.80 [0.69-0.93]; p-value for interaction 0.94).

Conclusions: In CCS patients, DPI reduced all-cause death and MACE while increasing major bleeding. The 2024 ESC criteria performed poorly in terms of distinguishing patients at high vs. low ischemic risk, making them inadequate to provide guidance for DPI use.

背景和目的:推荐阿司匹林和利伐沙班联合应用扩展双通路抑制(DPI)治疗高危慢性冠脉综合征(CCS)患者。在2024年更新的欧洲心脏病学会CCS指南中,对高危标准进行了修订。在COMPASS队列中,我们根据ESC标准在CCS患者中定义的基线风险评估DPI的净临床获益。方法:采用2024年ESC标准对随机接受阿司匹林或DPI治疗的CCS患者(n=15,429)进行风险分层。终点包括主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、全因死亡、致命/危重器官出血和复合不良事件(MACE和出血)。净临床获益是综合MACE和出血的30个月绝对风险差异。结果:高危状态与较高的30个月MACE发生率(6.4%比5.0%,HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.09-1.63)和复合不良事件(7.1%比5.7%,HR 1.31[1.09-1.58])相关,但与全因死亡或出血无关。DPI降低了MACE(低危:HR 0.66[0.45-0.95];高危:HR 0.77[0.66 -0.91];相互作用p值0.42)和全因死亡(低危:0.78[0.53-1.14];高危:HR 0.78[0.64-0.94],相互作用p值0.99)。DPI在低危患者(30个月风险差为-1.77% [-3.88-0.33],HR为0.79[0.56-1.11])和高危患者(30个月风险差为-2.06% [-3.20- 0.91],HR为0.80[0.69-0.93],相互作用的p值为0.94)中提供了相似的临床净获益。结论:在CCS患者中,DPI降低了全因死亡和MACE,但增加了大出血。2024 ESC标准在区分高和低缺血性风险患者方面表现不佳,不足以为DPI的使用提供指导。
{"title":"Net Clinical Benefit of Extended Dual Pathway Inhibition in Chronic Coronary Syndrome as Classified by the 2024 ESC Criteria: a COMPASS Substudy.","authors":"Morten Würtz, Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen, Qilong Yi, John W Eikelboom, Michael Maeng","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Extended dual pathway inhibition (DPI) with aspirin and rivaroxaban is recommended in high-risk patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). In the 2024 update of the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on CCS, the high-risk criteria were revised. In the COMPASS cohort, we evaluated net clinical benefit of DPI according to baseline risk as defined by the ESC criteria in CCS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CCS patients randomized to aspirin alone or DPI (n=15,429) were risk stratified using the 2024 ESC criteria. Endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause death, fatal/critical organ bleeding, and composite adverse events (MACE and bleeding). Net clinical benefit was the 30-month absolute risk difference combining MACE and bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High-risk status was associated with higher 30-month incidences of MACE (6.4% vs. 5.0%, HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.09-1.63) and composite adverse events (7.1% vs. 5.7%, HR 1.31 [1.09-1.58]), but not all-cause death or bleeding. DPI reduced MACE (low-risk: HR 0.66 [0.45-0.95]; high-risk: HR 0.77 [0.66.-0.91]; p-value for interaction 0.42) and all-cause death (low-risk: 0.78 [0.53-1.14]; high-risk: HR 0.78 [0.64-0.94], p-value for interaction 0.99). DPI provided similar net clinical benefit in low-risk (30-month risk difference -1.77% [-3.88-0.33], HR 0.79 [0.56-1.11]) and high-risk patients (30-month risk difference -2.06% [-3.20--0.91], HR 0.80 [0.69-0.93]; p-value for interaction 0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In CCS patients, DPI reduced all-cause death and MACE while increasing major bleeding. The 2024 ESC criteria performed poorly in terms of distinguishing patients at high vs. low ischemic risk, making them inadequate to provide guidance for DPI use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146085274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aspirin may take a back row seat for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention. 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后非st段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征,阿司匹林可能处于次要地位。
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-29 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf090
Patricia O Guimarães, Caio A M Tavares, Marcelo Franken, Pedro A Lemos
{"title":"Aspirin may take a back row seat for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention.","authors":"Patricia O Guimarães, Caio A M Tavares, Marcelo Franken, Pedro A Lemos","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf090","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146085211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cardiac Adverse Events Associated with Dual Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. 与双重免疫检查点抑制剂相关的心脏不良事件:来自FDA不良事件报告系统的药物警戒分析。
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag006
Huang Xia, Lei Shi, Shuimei Luo, Zequn Sun, Mengru Quan, Huazhen Xiao, Yu Chen, Jing Lin

Background: Immune-related adverse events(irAEs) are common among cancer patients receiving dual immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Cardiac adverse events rank among the most severe categories of such reactions. This study aims to investigate the characteristics and influencing factors of cardiac adverse events associated with dual ICIs.

Methods: We collected data on cardiac adverse events associated to dual ICIs from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database (FAERS), covering the period from the first quarter of 2015 to the fourth quarter of 2024. A disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the association between different dual ICIs and cardiac adverse events, and a comprehensive study was conducted to identify potential influencing factors.

Results: Cardiac adverse events accounted for 7.5% of all ICI adverse event reports in the FAERS database. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with the highest number of significant PT (Preferred Term) signals, while durvalumab plus tremelimumab had the highest percentage of life-threatening outcomes. The median onset time for cardiac adverse events following dual ICIs therapy was 32 days (IQR 15-77). Myositis and myasthenia gravis were the most commonly co-reported extracardiac conditions in myocarditis cases, whereas complete atrioventricular block and cardiogenic shock were the most frequently reported intracardiac complications. Older patients, males, and those with kidney cancer were at higher risk of developing cardiac adverse events.

Conclusions: This study identified distinct associations between different dual ICIs treatment strategies and various cardiac adverse events. We further identified potential risk factors and co-reported symptoms of cardiotoxicity, which may aid in the early diagnosis and monitoring of ICI-associated cardiac adverse events.

背景:免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)在接受双免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗的癌症患者中很常见。心脏不良事件是此类反应中最严重的一类。本研究旨在探讨双ici相关心脏不良事件的特点及影响因素。方法:我们从美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统数据库(FAERS)中收集了2015年第一季度至2024年第四季度期间与双ICIs相关的心脏不良事件的数据。进行歧化分析以评估不同双ici与心脏不良事件之间的关联,并进行全面研究以确定潜在的影响因素。结果:心脏不良事件占FAERS数据库中所有ICI不良事件报告的7.5%。Nivolumab + ipilimumab与最高数量的显著PT(首选术语)信号相关,而durvalumab + tremelimumab具有最高百分比的危及生命的结果。双ICIs治疗后心脏不良事件的中位发病时间为32天(IQR 15-77)。心肌炎和重症肌无力是最常见的心外并发症,而完全性房室传导阻滞和心源性休克是最常见的心内并发症。老年患者、男性和肾癌患者发生心脏不良事件的风险更高。结论:本研究确定了不同双ICIs治疗策略与各种心脏不良事件之间的明显关联。我们进一步确定了潜在的危险因素和共同报告的心脏毒性症状,这可能有助于ici相关心脏不良事件的早期诊断和监测。
{"title":"Cardiac Adverse Events Associated with Dual Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.","authors":"Huang Xia, Lei Shi, Shuimei Luo, Zequn Sun, Mengru Quan, Huazhen Xiao, Yu Chen, Jing Lin","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune-related adverse events(irAEs) are common among cancer patients receiving dual immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Cardiac adverse events rank among the most severe categories of such reactions. This study aims to investigate the characteristics and influencing factors of cardiac adverse events associated with dual ICIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data on cardiac adverse events associated to dual ICIs from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database (FAERS), covering the period from the first quarter of 2015 to the fourth quarter of 2024. A disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the association between different dual ICIs and cardiac adverse events, and a comprehensive study was conducted to identify potential influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cardiac adverse events accounted for 7.5% of all ICI adverse event reports in the FAERS database. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with the highest number of significant PT (Preferred Term) signals, while durvalumab plus tremelimumab had the highest percentage of life-threatening outcomes. The median onset time for cardiac adverse events following dual ICIs therapy was 32 days (IQR 15-77). Myositis and myasthenia gravis were the most commonly co-reported extracardiac conditions in myocarditis cases, whereas complete atrioventricular block and cardiogenic shock were the most frequently reported intracardiac complications. Older patients, males, and those with kidney cancer were at higher risk of developing cardiac adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified distinct associations between different dual ICIs treatment strategies and various cardiac adverse events. We further identified potential risk factors and co-reported symptoms of cardiotoxicity, which may aid in the early diagnosis and monitoring of ICI-associated cardiac adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of beta blockers in acute and chronic coronary syndromes without reduced ejection fraction: a landmark analysis from the REBOOT trial. -受体阻滞剂对急性和慢性冠状动脉综合征的疗效,但不降低射血分数:REBOOT试验的里程碑式分析
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag002
Xavier Rossello, José A Barrabés, Massimo Piepoli, Alberto Dominguez-Rodriguez, Pedro L Sánchez, Manuel Anguita, Sergio Raposeiras-Roubín, Giulietta Grigis, Jaume Agüero, Ruth Owen, Stuart Pocock, Carlos Nicolás Pérez-García, Noemí Escalera, Andrea Kallmeyer, Alessandro Sionis, Lidia Staszewsky, Alfonso Torres, Rocio Barquero, Felipe Fernández-Vazquez, Francisco Marín, Alfredo Vetrano, Pablo Pastor, Valentín Fuster, Roberto Latini, Borja Ibanez

Background and aims: Current guidelines recommend beta-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, recent trials question their benefit in patients with preserved LVEF. No study has yet compared beta-blocker effects during the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) phase (≤1 year post-MI) versus the chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) phase (>1 year).

Methods: In this pre-specified landmark analysis of the REBOOT trial, we evaluated the effect of beta-blocker therapy on outcomes in two post-MI phases: the ACS period (first year; cohort 1, n = 8,438) and the CCS period (>1 year, event-free patients with follow-up; cohort 2, n = 7,783). The primary endpoint was all-cause death, nonfatal reinfarction, or heart failure hospitalization; secondary endpoints included individual and additional cardiovascular events.

Results: Among 623 primary outcome events, 238 occurred in the first year (28.9/1,000 patient-years) and 385 thereafter (19.3/1,000 patient-years). Secondary prevention use was generally high, but patients with early events had lower prescription rates than those with late events or no events. Beta-blockers were not associated with lower risk of the primary or component outcomes in either phase. A nonsignificant trend toward benefit of beta-blockers appeared during the first year in patients with mildly reduced LVEF (41-49%), whereas in the CCS phase, higher beta-blocker doses were associated with worse outcomes.

Conclusions: In invasively treated MI patients with LVEF >40%, beta-blockers did not reduce adverse outcomes in either the ACS or CCS phases. These findings challenge their routine use in this population and support reconsidering current guidelines. Long-term beta-blocker users after MI may be candidates for deprescription.

背景和目的:目前的指南推荐在心肌梗死(MI)后使用β受体阻滞剂治疗,无论左心室射血分数(LVEF)如何。然而,最近的试验质疑它们对保留LVEF患者的益处。目前还没有研究比较-受体阻滞剂在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)期(心肌梗死后≤1年)和慢性冠脉综合征(CCS)期(bbb10 - 1年)的作用。方法:在这项预先指定的REBOOT试验里程碑分析中,我们评估了β受体阻滞剂治疗对心肌梗死后两个阶段结局的影响:ACS期(1年,队列1,n = 8438)和CCS期(1年,随访无事件患者,队列2,n = 7783)。主要终点为全因死亡、非致死性再梗死或心力衰竭住院;次要终点包括个体和附加心血管事件。结果:623个主要结局事件中,238个发生在第一年(28.9/ 1000患者-年),385个发生在第一年(19.3/ 1000患者-年)。二级预防的使用率普遍较高,但早期事件患者的处方率低于晚期事件患者或无事件患者。β受体阻滞剂与两期主要结局或组成结局的风险降低无关。在LVEF轻度降低的患者中,-受体阻滞剂的获益趋势不明显(41-49%),而在CCS阶段,高剂量的-受体阻滞剂与较差的结果相关。结论:在有创伤性治疗且LVEF为40%的心肌梗死患者中,受体阻滞剂并没有减少ACS或CCS期的不良结局。这些发现挑战了它们在这一人群中的常规使用,并支持重新考虑目前的指南。心肌梗死后长期β受体阻滞剂使用者可能是去处方的候选者。
{"title":"Effect of beta blockers in acute and chronic coronary syndromes without reduced ejection fraction: a landmark analysis from the REBOOT trial.","authors":"Xavier Rossello, José A Barrabés, Massimo Piepoli, Alberto Dominguez-Rodriguez, Pedro L Sánchez, Manuel Anguita, Sergio Raposeiras-Roubín, Giulietta Grigis, Jaume Agüero, Ruth Owen, Stuart Pocock, Carlos Nicolás Pérez-García, Noemí Escalera, Andrea Kallmeyer, Alessandro Sionis, Lidia Staszewsky, Alfonso Torres, Rocio Barquero, Felipe Fernández-Vazquez, Francisco Marín, Alfredo Vetrano, Pablo Pastor, Valentín Fuster, Roberto Latini, Borja Ibanez","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Current guidelines recommend beta-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, recent trials question their benefit in patients with preserved LVEF. No study has yet compared beta-blocker effects during the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) phase (≤1 year post-MI) versus the chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) phase (>1 year).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pre-specified landmark analysis of the REBOOT trial, we evaluated the effect of beta-blocker therapy on outcomes in two post-MI phases: the ACS period (first year; cohort 1, n = 8,438) and the CCS period (>1 year, event-free patients with follow-up; cohort 2, n = 7,783). The primary endpoint was all-cause death, nonfatal reinfarction, or heart failure hospitalization; secondary endpoints included individual and additional cardiovascular events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 623 primary outcome events, 238 occurred in the first year (28.9/1,000 patient-years) and 385 thereafter (19.3/1,000 patient-years). Secondary prevention use was generally high, but patients with early events had lower prescription rates than those with late events or no events. Beta-blockers were not associated with lower risk of the primary or component outcomes in either phase. A nonsignificant trend toward benefit of beta-blockers appeared during the first year in patients with mildly reduced LVEF (41-49%), whereas in the CCS phase, higher beta-blocker doses were associated with worse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In invasively treated MI patients with LVEF >40%, beta-blockers did not reduce adverse outcomes in either the ACS or CCS phases. These findings challenge their routine use in this population and support reconsidering current guidelines. Long-term beta-blocker users after MI may be candidates for deprescription.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Withdrawing heart failure therapy after AF rhythm control: promise, caution, and perspective. 心房颤动节律控制后撤销心力衰竭治疗:希望、谨慎和展望。
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag005
Felice Gragnano, Vincenzo De Sio, Mattia Galli, Paolo Calabrò
{"title":"Withdrawing heart failure therapy after AF rhythm control: promise, caution, and perspective.","authors":"Felice Gragnano, Vincenzo De Sio, Mattia Galli, Paolo Calabrò","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146003291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with improved long-term survival in Takotsubo syndrome: insights from large-scale real-world data. SGLT2抑制剂与Takotsubo综合征的长期生存改善相关:来自大规模现实世界数据的见解
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf088
Elias Rawish, Felicitas Lemmer, Katharina Kurz, Matthias Mezger, Toni Pätz, Thomas Stiermaier, Ingo Eitel

Aims: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute cardiac condition marked by transient left ventricular dysfunction. Pharmacological management is largely empirical. SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) offer cardioprotective effects in other cardiovascular diseases, but their impact in TTS is unclear. We thus aim to evaluate whether SGLT2i improves long-term survival after TTS.

Methods and results: We conducted a trial emulation based on real-world data of the TriNetX global network, including patients with TTS diagnosed October 2019-August 2025 (n = 31 018). The primary analysis emulated a de novo pharmacotherapy initiator cohort with a ≤72-h post-diagnosis enrolment window, evaluating the addition of SGLT2i to RAAS inhibitors (RAASi) and beta-blockers (BB). Follow-up began at pharmacotherapy initiation; two-year survival was analysed. Propensity-score matching was performed for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, renal function, initial left ventricular function at diagnosis, and acute severity markers. The median follow-up was 13.3 months. Two-year mortality was 17.5%. After matching (yielding well-balanced 524 patients per group), mortality was significantly reduced in the SGLT2i group compared with RAASi + BB alone (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.89). Results were consistent in an extended ≤30-day virtual-enrolment window. A supportive multivariable Cox model considered overall exposure to different therapies (n = 31 018). SGLT2i were associated with the largest reduction in mortality, followed by angiotensin receptor blockers, ACE inhibitors, and BB. Sacubitril/valsartan and MRAs showed no significant association with mortality.

Conclusion: In the largest real-world TTS cohort, SGLT2i were associated with lower long-term mortality. These findings support their consideration in TTS management and justify randomized trials to evaluate SGLT2i as adjunctive therapy.

目的:Takotsubo综合征(TTS)是一种以短暂性左心室功能障碍为特征的急性心脏疾病。药理学管理主要是经验性的。SGLT2抑制剂(SGLT2i)在其他心血管疾病中具有心脏保护作用,但其对TTS的影响尚不清楚。因此,我们的目的是评估SGLT2i是否能改善TTS后的长期生存。方法和结果:我们基于TriNetX全球网络的真实数据进行了试验模拟,包括2019年10月至2025年8月诊断为TTS的患者(n = 31 018)。初步分析模拟了一个诊断后≤72小时注册窗口的新生药物治疗启动者队列,评估SGLT2i添加到RAAS抑制剂(RAASi)和β受体阻滞剂(BB)中。药物治疗开始时开始随访;分析两年生存率。对年龄、性别、糖尿病、高血压、血脂异常、肾功能、诊断时初始左心室功能和急性严重程度标志物进行倾向评分匹配。中位随访时间为13.3个月。两年死亡率为17.5%。匹配后(平均每组524例患者),与单独RAASi + BB相比,SGLT2i组的死亡率显著降低(HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.89)。在延长≤30天的虚拟注册窗口中,结果是一致的。一个支持性多变量Cox模型考虑了不同疗法的总体暴露(n = 31 018)。SGLT2i与死亡率降低的相关性最大,其次是血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、ACE抑制剂和BB。Sacubitril/缬沙坦和MRAs与死亡率无显著相关性。结论:在最大的现实世界TTS队列中,SGLT2i与较低的长期死亡率相关。这些发现支持了他们在TTS管理中的考虑,并证明了随机试验评估SGLT2i作为辅助治疗的合理性。
{"title":"SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with improved long-term survival in Takotsubo syndrome: insights from large-scale real-world data.","authors":"Elias Rawish, Felicitas Lemmer, Katharina Kurz, Matthias Mezger, Toni Pätz, Thomas Stiermaier, Ingo Eitel","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute cardiac condition marked by transient left ventricular dysfunction. Pharmacological management is largely empirical. SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) offer cardioprotective effects in other cardiovascular diseases, but their impact in TTS is unclear. We thus aim to evaluate whether SGLT2i improves long-term survival after TTS.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We conducted a trial emulation based on real-world data of the TriNetX global network, including patients with TTS diagnosed October 2019-August 2025 (n = 31 018). The primary analysis emulated a de novo pharmacotherapy initiator cohort with a ≤72-h post-diagnosis enrolment window, evaluating the addition of SGLT2i to RAAS inhibitors (RAASi) and beta-blockers (BB). Follow-up began at pharmacotherapy initiation; two-year survival was analysed. Propensity-score matching was performed for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, renal function, initial left ventricular function at diagnosis, and acute severity markers. The median follow-up was 13.3 months. Two-year mortality was 17.5%. After matching (yielding well-balanced 524 patients per group), mortality was significantly reduced in the SGLT2i group compared with RAASi + BB alone (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.89). Results were consistent in an extended ≤30-day virtual-enrolment window. A supportive multivariable Cox model considered overall exposure to different therapies (n = 31 018). SGLT2i were associated with the largest reduction in mortality, followed by angiotensin receptor blockers, ACE inhibitors, and BB. Sacubitril/valsartan and MRAs showed no significant association with mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the largest real-world TTS cohort, SGLT2i were associated with lower long-term mortality. These findings support their consideration in TTS management and justify randomized trials to evaluate SGLT2i as adjunctive therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cardiovascular safety of 5α-reductase inhibitors in people with benign prostatic hyperplasia and type 2 diabetes: a propensity-score matched analysis. 5α-还原酶抑制剂对良性前列腺增生和2型糖尿病患者的心血管安全性:倾向评分匹配分析
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-17 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag003
Haolan Tu, Chengsheng Ju, Stuart J McGurnaghan, Luke A K Blackbourn, Ewan Pearson, Li Wei, Ruth Andrew

Aims: 5α-Reductase inhibitors are prescribed for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and their use is associated with increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes. This study assessed the long-term cardiovascular safety of 5α-reductase inhibitors in comparison with tamsulosin in people with co-existing BPH and type 2 diabetes.

Methods and results: We performed a retrospective, population-based cohort study using Scottish Diabetes Research Network National Diabetes Dataset (SDRN-NDS) and IQVIA Medical Research Data (IMRD-UK). BPH patients ≥40 years with recorded type 2 diabetes mellitus and ≥2 prescriptions of 5α-reductase inhibitors or tamsulosin (2006-2021) were included. After 1:2 variable ratio propensity score matching, cause-specific Cox proportional-hazard models were used to compute the hazard ratio (HR) of incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). A total of 11,969 patients were included in SDRN-NDS and 16,492 in IMRD-UK, with median follow-up durations of 3.8 (IQR: 1.7-6.8) and 4.8 (2.0-8.3) years, respectively. In SDRN-NDS, the HR of MACE in patients receiving 5α-reductase inhibitors relative to tamsulosin was 1.15 (95% CI 1.03-1.30, p = 0.007), driven by increased risk for myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 1.20, 1.03-1.40, p = 0.022). This was replicated in IMRD-UK, where HR was 1.26 (1.07-1.47, p = 0.008) for MACE and 1.33 (1.10-1.60, p = 0.005) for MI. We did not observe any increased risks in stroke, cardiovascular death, microvascular complications of diabetes or faster progression to insulin-based therapies.

Conclusions: Our retrospective data from two large cohorts suggest that the risk of MACE may be increased among patients with type 2 diabetes taking 5α-reductase inhibitors, potentially driven by increased risk of MI. This supports careful monitoring of macrovascular outcomes when prescribing 5α-reductase inhibitors in this population.

目的:5α-还原酶抑制剂用于治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH),其使用与2型糖尿病发生风险增加相关。本研究评估了5α-还原酶抑制剂与坦索罗辛在合并BPH和2型糖尿病患者中的长期心血管安全性。方法和结果:我们使用苏格兰糖尿病研究网络国家糖尿病数据集(SDRN-NDS)和IQVIA医学研究数据(IMRD-UK)进行了一项回顾性、基于人群的队列研究。纳入年龄≥40岁的BPH患者,并有2型糖尿病记录,且处方≥2张5α-还原酶抑制剂或坦索罗辛(2006-2021)。在1:2变比倾向评分匹配后,采用病因特异性Cox比例风险模型计算发生主要心血管不良事件(MACE)的风险比(HR)。SDRN-NDS共纳入11969例患者,IMRD-UK共纳入16492例患者,中位随访时间分别为3.8年(IQR: 1.7-6.8)和4.8年(2.0-8.3)年。在SDRN-NDS中,与坦索罗辛相比,接受5α-还原酶抑制剂治疗的患者MACE的风险比为1.15 (95% CI 1.03-1.30, p = 0.007),这是因为心肌梗死(MI)的风险增加(HR 1.20, 1.03-1.40, p = 0.022)。在IMRD-UK中也得到了同样的结果,MACE的风险比为1.26 (1.07-1.47,p = 0.008), MI的风险比为1.33 (1.10-1.60,p = 0.005)。我们没有观察到卒中、心血管死亡、糖尿病微血管并发症的风险增加,也没有观察到以胰岛素为基础的治疗进展更快。结论:我们来自两个大型队列的回顾性数据表明,服用5α-还原酶抑制剂的2型糖尿病患者MACE的风险可能增加,这可能是心肌梗死风险增加的原因。这支持在这类人群中处方5α-还原酶抑制剂时仔细监测大血管结局。
{"title":"Cardiovascular safety of 5α-reductase inhibitors in people with benign prostatic hyperplasia and type 2 diabetes: a propensity-score matched analysis.","authors":"Haolan Tu, Chengsheng Ju, Stuart J McGurnaghan, Luke A K Blackbourn, Ewan Pearson, Li Wei, Ruth Andrew","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>5α-Reductase inhibitors are prescribed for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and their use is associated with increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes. This study assessed the long-term cardiovascular safety of 5α-reductase inhibitors in comparison with tamsulosin in people with co-existing BPH and type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We performed a retrospective, population-based cohort study using Scottish Diabetes Research Network National Diabetes Dataset (SDRN-NDS) and IQVIA Medical Research Data (IMRD-UK). BPH patients ≥40 years with recorded type 2 diabetes mellitus and ≥2 prescriptions of 5α-reductase inhibitors or tamsulosin (2006-2021) were included. After 1:2 variable ratio propensity score matching, cause-specific Cox proportional-hazard models were used to compute the hazard ratio (HR) of incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). A total of 11,969 patients were included in SDRN-NDS and 16,492 in IMRD-UK, with median follow-up durations of 3.8 (IQR: 1.7-6.8) and 4.8 (2.0-8.3) years, respectively. In SDRN-NDS, the HR of MACE in patients receiving 5α-reductase inhibitors relative to tamsulosin was 1.15 (95% CI 1.03-1.30, p = 0.007), driven by increased risk for myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 1.20, 1.03-1.40, p = 0.022). This was replicated in IMRD-UK, where HR was 1.26 (1.07-1.47, p = 0.008) for MACE and 1.33 (1.10-1.60, p = 0.005) for MI. We did not observe any increased risks in stroke, cardiovascular death, microvascular complications of diabetes or faster progression to insulin-based therapies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our retrospective data from two large cohorts suggest that the risk of MACE may be increased among patients with type 2 diabetes taking 5α-reductase inhibitors, potentially driven by increased risk of MI. This supports careful monitoring of macrovascular outcomes when prescribing 5α-reductase inhibitors in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1