Auditory neural processing during active task engagement and passive listening reflects distinct task contexts with potentially different behavioural relevance. While both contexts elicit deviance-related responses, it remains unclear, which yields neural measures that more reliably predict individual differences in behavioural performance. To address this question, we employed a multi-feature auditory paradigm in which frequency, duration, and intensity deviants were presented under passive (no response required) and active (explicit detection required) conditions. EEG was recorded from 47 participants; passive listening was characterized by a prominent mismatch negativity (MMN), whereas active discrimination was characterized by an additional P3b component. Beyond conventional ERP measures, we quantified individual-level neural discriminability using EEGNet, a neural-network–based classifier, by classifying deviant versus standard single-trial epochs and deriving cross-validated decoding accuracy. Behavioural performance was quantified using an efficiency score (ES) that integrates hit rate and reaction time. Participants were stratified into high- and low-performance groups based on a median split of ES. Results showed that the expected MMN during passive listening and the P3b during active discrimination were elicited, as confirmed by spatiotemporal cluster-based permutation analysis. Furthermore, decoding accuracy derived from the active discrimination condition robustly separated high- and low-performance groups (Group × Task: F = 29.62, p < 0.001) and predicted behavioural efficiency across individuals (r = 0.53, p < 0.01). In contrast, passive-listening decoding showed reduced overall discriminability and minimal group separation. Together, these findings indicate that task engagement amplifies the behavioural relevance of single-trial neural discriminability, enabling stronger auditory brain–behaviour prediction than passive listening.
主动任务参与和被动倾听过程中的听觉神经加工反映了具有潜在不同行为相关性的不同任务情境。虽然这两种情况都会引起与偏差相关的反应,但目前尚不清楚,哪种神经测量方法能更可靠地预测行为表现的个体差异。为了解决这个问题,我们采用了一个多特征听觉范式,在被动(不需要反应)和主动(需要明确检测)条件下呈现频率、持续时间和强度偏差。记录47名参与者的脑电图;被动倾听的特征是显著的失配负性(MMN),而主动辨别的特征是额外的P3b成分。除了传统的ERP测量,我们使用EEGNet(一种基于神经网络的分类器)量化了个人层面的神经可辨别性,通过将偏差与标准的单次试验时代进行分类,并获得交叉验证的解码精度。行为表现采用效率评分(ES)进行量化,该评分综合了命中率和反应时间。根据ES的中位数划分,将参与者分为高绩效组和低绩效组。结果表明,基于时空聚类的排列分析证实了被动聆听时的预期MMN和主动辨别时的预期P3b。此外,基于主动区分条件的解码准确率稳健地分离了高、低表现组(组×任务:F = 29.62, p . 642)
{"title":"Active Task Engagement Enhances Auditory Brain–Behaviour Prediction From Single-Trial EEG Compared With Passive Listening","authors":"Zhaonan Ma, Xiaoyu Wang, Xiao Yang, Chao Guo, Tommi Kärkkäinen, Fengyu Cong","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70438","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejn.70438","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Auditory neural processing during active task engagement and passive listening reflects distinct task contexts with potentially different behavioural relevance. While both contexts elicit deviance-related responses, it remains unclear, which yields neural measures that more reliably predict individual differences in behavioural performance. To address this question, we employed a multi-feature auditory paradigm in which frequency, duration, and intensity deviants were presented under passive (no response required) and active (explicit detection required) conditions. EEG was recorded from 47 participants; passive listening was characterized by a prominent mismatch negativity (MMN), whereas active discrimination was characterized by an additional P3b component. Beyond conventional ERP measures, we quantified individual-level neural discriminability using EEGNet, a neural-network–based classifier, by classifying deviant versus standard single-trial epochs and deriving cross-validated decoding accuracy. Behavioural performance was quantified using an efficiency score (ES) that integrates hit rate and reaction time. Participants were stratified into high- and low-performance groups based on a median split of ES. Results showed that the expected MMN during passive listening and the P3b during active discrimination were elicited, as confirmed by spatiotemporal cluster-based permutation analysis. Furthermore, decoding accuracy derived from the active discrimination condition robustly separated high- and low-performance groups (Group × Task: F = 29.62, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and predicted behavioural efficiency across individuals (r = 0.53, <i>p</i> < 0.01). In contrast, passive-listening decoding showed reduced overall discriminability and minimal group separation. Together, these findings indicate that task engagement amplifies the behavioural relevance of single-trial neural discriminability, enabling stronger auditory brain–behaviour prediction than passive listening.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"63 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12921835/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146257802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}