Fabian Aurich, Andreas Widmann, Tjerk T Dercksen, Betina Korka, Anni Richter, Max-Philipp Stenner, Nicole Wetzel
To interact efficiently with our environment, our brain predicts the sensory effects of our actions and compares them with the actual outcomes. This allows us to adapt our actions when predictions and sensory outcomes mismatch. While this process is generally well understood for action-sound predictions, it is an open question whether these predictions can flexibly switch in frequently changing environments, as they occur in real life. To investigate the flexibility of top-down predictions, we asked participants (N = 41) to press one of two buttons, a left-hand and a right-hand button, and switch hands autonomously. One button frequently produced a sound (80%) and rarely no sound. The other button frequently generated no sound (80%) and rarely produced a sound. In a third, separate condition, each button produced a sound in 50% of the trials. Unexpected sounds and unexpected sound omissions elicited a series of error-related brain responses in the electroencephalogram (EEG) at different levels of auditory processing, including a mismatch negativity (MMN) and the P3 complex for unexpected sounds, and the oN1, oN2, and oP3 complex for unexpected omissions. Moreover, unexpected sounds elicited an equivalent MMN, regardless of whether silence was expected (80%) or no reliable expectation was possible (50%), while later P3 components showed different amplitudes. Our results demonstrate flexible action-sound predictions at sensory and higher cortical levels. Furthermore, they indicate that predicted silence does not have an explicit sensory representation at lower levels but emerges at later stages, when higher-level information has been integrated.
{"title":"Neural Correlates of Dynamic Predictions and Prediction Errors in Response to Unexpected Silence and Sound.","authors":"Fabian Aurich, Andreas Widmann, Tjerk T Dercksen, Betina Korka, Anni Richter, Max-Philipp Stenner, Nicole Wetzel","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70422","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejn.70422","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To interact efficiently with our environment, our brain predicts the sensory effects of our actions and compares them with the actual outcomes. This allows us to adapt our actions when predictions and sensory outcomes mismatch. While this process is generally well understood for action-sound predictions, it is an open question whether these predictions can flexibly switch in frequently changing environments, as they occur in real life. To investigate the flexibility of top-down predictions, we asked participants (N = 41) to press one of two buttons, a left-hand and a right-hand button, and switch hands autonomously. One button frequently produced a sound (80%) and rarely no sound. The other button frequently generated no sound (80%) and rarely produced a sound. In a third, separate condition, each button produced a sound in 50% of the trials. Unexpected sounds and unexpected sound omissions elicited a series of error-related brain responses in the electroencephalogram (EEG) at different levels of auditory processing, including a mismatch negativity (MMN) and the P3 complex for unexpected sounds, and the oN1, oN2, and oP3 complex for unexpected omissions. Moreover, unexpected sounds elicited an equivalent MMN, regardless of whether silence was expected (80%) or no reliable expectation was possible (50%), while later P3 components showed different amplitudes. Our results demonstrate flexible action-sound predictions at sensory and higher cortical levels. Furthermore, they indicate that predicted silence does not have an explicit sensory representation at lower levels but emerges at later stages, when higher-level information has been integrated.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"63 4","pages":"e70422"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12935523/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147303788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Esther E Puiras, Jenna N Bissonnette, Alexandra O MacNeil, Krista M Hull, Elizabeth M Myles, Kaitlyn Napier, Bronwen Schryver, Sydney Slaunwhite-Hay, Randy L Newman, Tara S Perrot, Derek J Fisher
Caffeine, the most used global stimulant, can impact neurocognition. Hormonal fluctuations occurring across the human menstrual cycle affect similar cognitive domains. Research is needed to identify whether the purported cognitive-enhancing effects of caffeine vary across menstrual cycle phase. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of caffeine on EEG-derived markers of auditory change detection and novelty processing (MMN, P3a, P3b and RON) across phases of the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling females. Participants were randomly assigned to complete the experiment while in their menstrual (n = 31), follicular (n = 26) or luteal (n = 29) phase, completing two sessions wherein they were administered either a caffeine pill (200 mg, oral) or a placebo in a counterbalanced order using a randomized, double-blinded procedure. Auditory tone detection was assessed via a novelty oddball task while EEG data were collected. Caffeine significantly enhanced target detection at both the neural (P3b, MMN and RON) and behavioural levels, with effects most prominent in the menstrual phase. Additionally, P3a and P3b amplitudes differed significantly between phase groups under placebo conditions but not under caffeine conditions. Caffeine significantly enhanced target detection at both the electrophysiological and behavioural levels, with these effects mostly limited to the menstrual phase. Additionally, there were significant differences in ERP activity between all menstrual phases under both placebo and caffeine conditions. Our results suggest that caffeine enhances auditory novelty processing, particularly during the menstrual phase, though future research is needed to further explore the intersection of caffeine and the HMC.
{"title":"The EEG-Indexed Impacts of Caffeine on Auditory Novelty Processing Across Phases of the Human Menstrual Cycle.","authors":"Esther E Puiras, Jenna N Bissonnette, Alexandra O MacNeil, Krista M Hull, Elizabeth M Myles, Kaitlyn Napier, Bronwen Schryver, Sydney Slaunwhite-Hay, Randy L Newman, Tara S Perrot, Derek J Fisher","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70440","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejn.70440","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Caffeine, the most used global stimulant, can impact neurocognition. Hormonal fluctuations occurring across the human menstrual cycle affect similar cognitive domains. Research is needed to identify whether the purported cognitive-enhancing effects of caffeine vary across menstrual cycle phase. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of caffeine on EEG-derived markers of auditory change detection and novelty processing (MMN, P3a, P3b and RON) across phases of the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling females. Participants were randomly assigned to complete the experiment while in their menstrual (n = 31), follicular (n = 26) or luteal (n = 29) phase, completing two sessions wherein they were administered either a caffeine pill (200 mg, oral) or a placebo in a counterbalanced order using a randomized, double-blinded procedure. Auditory tone detection was assessed via a novelty oddball task while EEG data were collected. Caffeine significantly enhanced target detection at both the neural (P3b, MMN and RON) and behavioural levels, with effects most prominent in the menstrual phase. Additionally, P3a and P3b amplitudes differed significantly between phase groups under placebo conditions but not under caffeine conditions. Caffeine significantly enhanced target detection at both the electrophysiological and behavioural levels, with these effects mostly limited to the menstrual phase. Additionally, there were significant differences in ERP activity between all menstrual phases under both placebo and caffeine conditions. Our results suggest that caffeine enhances auditory novelty processing, particularly during the menstrual phase, though future research is needed to further explore the intersection of caffeine and the HMC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"63 4","pages":"e70440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12935497/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147303819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anurag Pandey, Sungmin Kang, Nicole Pacchiarini, Hanna Wyszynska, Zena Masseri, Joseph O'Neill, Robert C. Honey, Kevin Fox
The relationship between primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortex is not well understood, and the role of S2 in somatosensory function is not well defined. To test the role of S2 and its interplay with S1 in learning a texture discrimination, we reversibly inhibited primary (S1) and/or secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) bilaterally using DREADDs and measured the effect on the ability of mice to learn a whisker-dependent tactile discrimination. Freely moving mice foraged in an arena that contained two bowls, one of which contained a buried food reward. The bowls could only be distinguished by the texture on the outer surface. DREADD-mediated inhibition suppressed sensory responses and disrupted network activity in the cortical area in which DREADDs were expressed. We found that both S1 and S2 were critical for learning the tactile discrimination. Tactile learning in naive mice required normal S2 function during the learning phase but not during the post-training consolidation phase of approximately 6 h. Furthermore, S2 was only required during learning. Once expert levels of discrimination had been attained, S2 was not required for execution of the learned discrimination. The role of S2 was confined to tactile learning and was not required for olfactory discrimination. Our findings suggest that S1 and S2 interact when learning a new tactile discrimination, but the learned skill eventually becomes independent of S2.
{"title":"Secondary Somatosensory Cortex Is Required for Learning but Not Execution of a Tactile Discrimination","authors":"Anurag Pandey, Sungmin Kang, Nicole Pacchiarini, Hanna Wyszynska, Zena Masseri, Joseph O'Neill, Robert C. Honey, Kevin Fox","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70390","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejn.70390","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The relationship between primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortex is not well understood, and the role of S2 in somatosensory function is not well defined. To test the role of S2 and its interplay with S1 in learning a texture discrimination, we reversibly inhibited primary (S1) and/or secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) bilaterally using DREADDs and measured the effect on the ability of mice to learn a whisker-dependent tactile discrimination. Freely moving mice foraged in an arena that contained two bowls, one of which contained a buried food reward. The bowls could only be distinguished by the texture on the outer surface. DREADD-mediated inhibition suppressed sensory responses and disrupted network activity in the cortical area in which DREADDs were expressed. We found that both S1 and S2 were critical for learning the tactile discrimination. Tactile learning in naive mice required normal S2 function during the learning phase but not during the post-training consolidation phase of approximately 6 h. Furthermore, S2 was only required during learning. Once expert levels of discrimination had been attained, S2 was not required for execution of the learned discrimination. The role of S2 was confined to tactile learning and was not required for olfactory discrimination. Our findings suggest that S1 and S2 interact when learning a new tactile discrimination, but the learned skill eventually becomes independent of S2.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"63 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12853412/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146085253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tsetse flies (Glossina sp.) are important disease vectors with unique biology that makes them fascinating models to study the evolution of behaviour and its underlying neural circuits. They evolved blood-feeding in an independent event from mosquitoes, and unlike most insects, give birth to a single live offspring—rather than laying eggs. Given their impact on public health, they have been extensively studied with a strong focus on vector control. However, information on their sensory ecology and neurobiology is thinly spread across the literature. Here, we review over a hundred years of literature on tsetse sensory systems, including olfaction, vision, audition, taste, thermosensation and mechanosensation, in the context of the behaviours they drive, including host-finding, blood-feeding and mating. We embed the available data within our more detailed understanding of the sensory systems of the vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster and other diptera. This sets the stage for future work on how tsetse find their hosts and reproduce, opening new avenues to understand how their sensory systems function and evolve, which in turn will inform better control strategies to reduce the burden of the diseases they transmit.
{"title":"The Sensory Ecology of Tsetse Flies: Neuroscience Perspectives on a Disease Vector","authors":"Andrea Adden, Lucia L. Prieto-Godino","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70377","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejn.70377","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tsetse flies (<i>Glossina</i> sp.) are important disease vectors with unique biology that makes them fascinating models to study the evolution of behaviour and its underlying neural circuits. They evolved blood-feeding in an independent event from mosquitoes, and unlike most insects, give birth to a single live offspring—rather than laying eggs. Given their impact on public health, they have been extensively studied with a strong focus on vector control. However, information on their sensory ecology and neurobiology is thinly spread across the literature. Here, we review over a hundred years of literature on tsetse sensory systems, including olfaction, vision, audition, taste, thermosensation and mechanosensation, in the context of the behaviours they drive, including host-finding, blood-feeding and mating. We embed the available data within our more detailed understanding of the sensory systems of the vinegar fly <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> and other diptera. This sets the stage for future work on how tsetse find their hosts and reproduce, opening new avenues to understand how their sensory systems function and evolve, which in turn will inform better control strategies to reduce the burden of the diseases they transmit.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"63 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12848969/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146061142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Uncertainty is a key contributor to decision making, and humans show inconsistent attitudes towards it. Although excessive uncertainty-avoidance or uncertainty-seeking are hallmark symptoms of several mental conditions, the neural mechanism underlying uncertainty seeking and avoidance remains unclear. Here, we probed whether changes in pupil-linked arousal are indicative of uncertainty avoidance in humans. Investigating baseline pupil size to capture endogenous fluctuations across two experiments (N1 = 24, N2 = 21), we found that pretrial pupillary responses (as early as 700 ms prior to the onset of a trial) were closely related to uncertainty attitudes during multiarmed bandit tasks. Although increased baseline pupil size signalled avoidance in uncertainty-related decisions, it did not foreshadow value processing per se. The specificity of our results suggests that uncertainty processing is dynamic and depends on (potentially noradrenergic) endogenous pupil fluctuations.
{"title":"Increased Baseline Pupil Size Linked to Uncertainty Avoidance in Decision Making","authors":"Ehsan Kakaei, Anne Schlecht, Tobias U. Hauser","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70394","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejn.70394","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Uncertainty is a key contributor to decision making, and humans show inconsistent attitudes towards it. Although excessive uncertainty-avoidance or uncertainty-seeking are hallmark symptoms of several mental conditions, the neural mechanism underlying uncertainty seeking and avoidance remains unclear. Here, we probed whether changes in pupil-linked arousal are indicative of uncertainty avoidance in humans. Investigating baseline pupil size to capture endogenous fluctuations across two experiments (<i>N</i><sub>1</sub> = 24, <i>N</i><sub>2</sub> = 21), we found that pretrial pupillary responses (as early as 700 ms prior to the onset of a trial) were closely related to uncertainty attitudes during multiarmed bandit tasks. Although increased baseline pupil size signalled avoidance in uncertainty-related decisions, it did not foreshadow value processing per se. The specificity of our results suggests that uncertainty processing is dynamic and depends on (potentially noradrenergic) endogenous pupil fluctuations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"63 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12848648/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146061090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}