Pub Date : 2026-02-10DOI: 10.1007/s00330-026-12339-4
Jelle Barentsz, Jos Immerzeel, Marloes van der Leest, Erik Cornel
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model based on multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for localising clinically significant prostate cancer by simulation of targeted biopsies.","authors":"Jelle Barentsz, Jos Immerzeel, Marloes van der Leest, Erik Cornel","doi":"10.1007/s00330-026-12339-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12339-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146149564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-10DOI: 10.1007/s00330-026-12342-9
D L van den Kroonenberg, A W Postema, H P Beerlage, J R Oddens
{"title":"Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model based on multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for localizing clinically significant prostate cancer by simulation of targeted biopsies.","authors":"D L van den Kroonenberg, A W Postema, H P Beerlage, J R Oddens","doi":"10.1007/s00330-026-12342-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12342-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146149555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-09DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-12234-4
Hubert Beaumont, Luca Cantini, Kamal S Saini, Nathalie Faye, Ritu Gill, Antoine Iannessi
Objective: Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) with double reads and adjudication is crucial in imaging-based clinical trials to ensure quality data. However, discrepancies in double reading can affect trial outcomes, particularly in assessing disease progression in phase 3 oncology studies using RECIST 1.1 criteria. This study examined discordance in the date of progressive disease (DoPD) across RECIST components: target lesion (TL), non-target lesion (nTL), new lesion (NL), exploring its impact on survival curves and whether discrepancies stem from timing differences or true/false PD detection.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from five clinical trials using BICR with double reads plus adjudication, involving 1932 lung cancer patients on immunotherapy or targeted therapy. RECIST components were examined to assess DoPD concordance, discrepancies, adjudicator acceptance, detection timing, and impact on survival curves.
Results: Readers showed a 39.3% discordance rate in DoPD assessments, with agreement on 17.3% of DoPD cases and 43.4% of non-PD cases. In 54.2% of concordant cases, multiple RECIST components contributed to PD. Discordance was primarily caused by NL (41.4%), sum of TL diameter increase (33.3%), nTL (11.8%), or multiple components (13.4%). In 49.2% of discrepant cases, PD was reported late, usually within one treatment cycle (79.8%). 62.5% of disputed PD cases were accepted by adjudication.
Conclusion: Different RECIST components vary in their likelihood of causing discordance and being accepted or refuted by adjudicators. NL detection is key for identifying progression but also the main source of disagreement. Using multiple RECIST components enhances the reliability of PD assessment.
Key points: Question How does discordance across RECIST components-especially new lesion detection-influence progression assessment timing and potentially alter survival outcomes in oncology clinical trials? Findings Reader disagreement on progression dates is common, driven mainly by new lesion detection; incorporating multiple RECIST components increases alignment and strengthens PD determination reliability. Clinical relevance Imaging endpoints guide cancer treatment decisions. RECIST 1.1 is the standard, inter-reader variability can undermine PFS accuracy. By evaluating RECIST component reliability, this work aims to improve trial precision, enabling faster, more confident decisions that ultimately benefit patients.
{"title":"What are RECIST 1.1 progressions made of? Variability in double-read oncology trials.","authors":"Hubert Beaumont, Luca Cantini, Kamal S Saini, Nathalie Faye, Ritu Gill, Antoine Iannessi","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-12234-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12234-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) with double reads and adjudication is crucial in imaging-based clinical trials to ensure quality data. However, discrepancies in double reading can affect trial outcomes, particularly in assessing disease progression in phase 3 oncology studies using RECIST 1.1 criteria. This study examined discordance in the date of progressive disease (DoPD) across RECIST components: target lesion (TL), non-target lesion (nTL), new lesion (NL), exploring its impact on survival curves and whether discrepancies stem from timing differences or true/false PD detection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from five clinical trials using BICR with double reads plus adjudication, involving 1932 lung cancer patients on immunotherapy or targeted therapy. RECIST components were examined to assess DoPD concordance, discrepancies, adjudicator acceptance, detection timing, and impact on survival curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Readers showed a 39.3% discordance rate in DoPD assessments, with agreement on 17.3% of DoPD cases and 43.4% of non-PD cases. In 54.2% of concordant cases, multiple RECIST components contributed to PD. Discordance was primarily caused by NL (41.4%), sum of TL diameter increase (33.3%), nTL (11.8%), or multiple components (13.4%). In 49.2% of discrepant cases, PD was reported late, usually within one treatment cycle (79.8%). 62.5% of disputed PD cases were accepted by adjudication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different RECIST components vary in their likelihood of causing discordance and being accepted or refuted by adjudicators. NL detection is key for identifying progression but also the main source of disagreement. Using multiple RECIST components enhances the reliability of PD assessment.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question How does discordance across RECIST components-especially new lesion detection-influence progression assessment timing and potentially alter survival outcomes in oncology clinical trials? Findings Reader disagreement on progression dates is common, driven mainly by new lesion detection; incorporating multiple RECIST components increases alignment and strengthens PD determination reliability. Clinical relevance Imaging endpoints guide cancer treatment decisions. RECIST 1.1 is the standard, inter-reader variability can undermine PFS accuracy. By evaluating RECIST component reliability, this work aims to improve trial precision, enabling faster, more confident decisions that ultimately benefit patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146149190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-09DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-12307-4
Frédéric E Lecouvet, Lokmane Taihi, Thomas Kirchgesner, Vassiliki Pasoglou, Marin Halut, Hatice Tuba Sanal, Salvatore Gitto, Teodoro Martín-Noguerol, Violeta Vasilevska-Nikodinovska, Filip Vanhoenacker, Joan C Vilanova
Involvement of the bone marrow by metastases from solid tumors or multiple myeloma (MM) is a critical challenge in oncologic imaging. Lesion detection and staging, as well as accurate assessment of treatment response, disease recurrence, and complications, are key to optimal patient management. This article provides recommendations for performing and interpreting bone marrow MRI in cancer patients. MRI should be the primary imaging modality for patients suspected of having skeletal bone metastases or MM, and should replace radiography, bone scintigraphy, and CT for these indications. Protocols must be tailored to the clinical context and to each specific cancer. Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is preferred for a comprehensive assessment, while axial skeleton MRI (AS-MRI) is a fast and reliable alternative for targeted or follow-up evaluations. We recommend standardized protocols that incorporate anatomical sequences (preferably fast spin echo T2 Dixon) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Quantitative biomarkers, e.g., apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fat fraction (FF), should be implemented to improve diagnostic accuracy and evaluate treatment response. Radiologists must be familiar with the typical patterns of bone marrow replacement by cancer cells, response assessment principles, and common imaging pitfalls. Every medical imaging facility should offer optimal bone marrow MRI and implement these recommendations using available MRI systems and existing disease-oriented guidelines. This ESR Essentials illustrates when, how, and why to perform bone marrow MRI to improve diagnostic precision and oncologic care across a broad range of indications. KEY POINTS: Prefer MRI of the bone marrow over radiographs, bone scintigraphy, or CT for suspected bone metastases of solid cancers and for myeloma staging. Use MRI for diagnosis of bone involvement, disease staging, assessment of lesion response to treatment, detection of recurrence, and assessment of osseous complications. Tailor MRI protocol to cancer type following existing guidelines, targeting either the axial skeleton or the "whole body," and using a panel of sequences with fat-sensitive, fast spin echo T2 Dixon and diffusion-weighted sequences as the fundamental components.
{"title":"ESR Essentials: bone marrow MRI in oncology-practice recommendations by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology.","authors":"Frédéric E Lecouvet, Lokmane Taihi, Thomas Kirchgesner, Vassiliki Pasoglou, Marin Halut, Hatice Tuba Sanal, Salvatore Gitto, Teodoro Martín-Noguerol, Violeta Vasilevska-Nikodinovska, Filip Vanhoenacker, Joan C Vilanova","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-12307-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12307-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Involvement of the bone marrow by metastases from solid tumors or multiple myeloma (MM) is a critical challenge in oncologic imaging. Lesion detection and staging, as well as accurate assessment of treatment response, disease recurrence, and complications, are key to optimal patient management. This article provides recommendations for performing and interpreting bone marrow MRI in cancer patients. MRI should be the primary imaging modality for patients suspected of having skeletal bone metastases or MM, and should replace radiography, bone scintigraphy, and CT for these indications. Protocols must be tailored to the clinical context and to each specific cancer. Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is preferred for a comprehensive assessment, while axial skeleton MRI (AS-MRI) is a fast and reliable alternative for targeted or follow-up evaluations. We recommend standardized protocols that incorporate anatomical sequences (preferably fast spin echo T2 Dixon) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Quantitative biomarkers, e.g., apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fat fraction (FF), should be implemented to improve diagnostic accuracy and evaluate treatment response. Radiologists must be familiar with the typical patterns of bone marrow replacement by cancer cells, response assessment principles, and common imaging pitfalls. Every medical imaging facility should offer optimal bone marrow MRI and implement these recommendations using available MRI systems and existing disease-oriented guidelines. This ESR Essentials illustrates when, how, and why to perform bone marrow MRI to improve diagnostic precision and oncologic care across a broad range of indications. KEY POINTS: Prefer MRI of the bone marrow over radiographs, bone scintigraphy, or CT for suspected bone metastases of solid cancers and for myeloma staging. Use MRI for diagnosis of bone involvement, disease staging, assessment of lesion response to treatment, detection of recurrence, and assessment of osseous complications. Tailor MRI protocol to cancer type following existing guidelines, targeting either the axial skeleton or the \"whole body,\" and using a panel of sequences with fat-sensitive, fast spin echo T2 Dixon and diffusion-weighted sequences as the fundamental components.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146149505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-09DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-12317-2
Laurent Letourneau-Guillon
{"title":"Unlocking the full potential of MRI with artificial intelligence for pre-operative meningioma evaluation.","authors":"Laurent Letourneau-Guillon","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-12317-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12317-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146149522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-12318-1
Cameron Englman, Busola Adebusoye, Michele Cosenza, Andrea Del Prete, Louise Dickinson, Giulio Imperiale, Riccardo Leni, Giorgio Gandaglia, Francesco De Cobelli, Sue Mallett, Alex Kirkham, Caroline M Moore, Francesco Giganti, Giorgio Brembilla
Objectives: Prostate cancer (PCa) lesions can be measured on MRI using maximum or biaxial diameters, or as volumes derived by the ellipsoid formula or planimetry. We evaluated the inter- and intra-rater reliability (reliability between different radiologists and the same radiologist during different reading sessions) of lesion size measurements on baseline MRI scans for patients on active surveillance (AS).
Materials and methods: Twenty patients with low- or intermediate-risk PCa (Gleason score 3 + 3 or 3 + 4) and MRI-visible lesions were selected from AS cohorts at two centres (United Kingdom and Italy). Five radiologists, blinded to clinical outcomes and reports, independently measured the index lesion on a baseline MRI scan in a single reading session using: (1) maximum diameter; (2) biaxial diameters; (3) ellipsoid volume, and (4) planimetry volume. Measurements were repeated after a 4-week washout period. Strip plots present lesion size measurements for all methods and readers. Bland-Altman plots were used to present intra-rater reliability.
Results: Graphical presentation of measurements across the twenty patients enabled examination of variability between methods, readers, and reads. There was considerable variation for all methods, and for a single lesion, size measurements spanned previously accepted definitions of clinically significant and insignificant disease. Inter-rater reliability decreased for larger lesions, with notable radiologist-specific differences, and intra-rater reliability appeared better overall.
Conclusion: This study underscores the difficulty of reliably measuring PCa lesions during AS. Intra-rater reliability appeared greater than inter-rater reliability, emphasising that radiologists should remeasure lesions when tracking changes. More work is needed on measuring change in lesion size across serial MRI scans.
Key points: Question Several methods exist for measuring prostate cancer lesion size on MRI for patients on active surveillance, but it is unclear how reliable these methods are. Findings Lesion size measurements varied widely across methods and readers, often spanning thresholds for clinically significant disease, and intra-rater reliability was generally better than inter-rater reliability. Clinical relevance Variability in lesion size measurements on MRI may lead to inconsistent clinical decisions during active surveillance. Our findings emphasise that regardless of the method used, lesions should be remeasured by the same radiologist when monitoring patients on active surveillance.
{"title":"Inter- and intra-rater variability of MRI-based lesion size measurements in active surveillance for prostate cancer: a multicentre study.","authors":"Cameron Englman, Busola Adebusoye, Michele Cosenza, Andrea Del Prete, Louise Dickinson, Giulio Imperiale, Riccardo Leni, Giorgio Gandaglia, Francesco De Cobelli, Sue Mallett, Alex Kirkham, Caroline M Moore, Francesco Giganti, Giorgio Brembilla","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-12318-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12318-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) lesions can be measured on MRI using maximum or biaxial diameters, or as volumes derived by the ellipsoid formula or planimetry. We evaluated the inter- and intra-rater reliability (reliability between different radiologists and the same radiologist during different reading sessions) of lesion size measurements on baseline MRI scans for patients on active surveillance (AS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty patients with low- or intermediate-risk PCa (Gleason score 3 + 3 or 3 + 4) and MRI-visible lesions were selected from AS cohorts at two centres (United Kingdom and Italy). Five radiologists, blinded to clinical outcomes and reports, independently measured the index lesion on a baseline MRI scan in a single reading session using: (1) maximum diameter; (2) biaxial diameters; (3) ellipsoid volume, and (4) planimetry volume. Measurements were repeated after a 4-week washout period. Strip plots present lesion size measurements for all methods and readers. Bland-Altman plots were used to present intra-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Graphical presentation of measurements across the twenty patients enabled examination of variability between methods, readers, and reads. There was considerable variation for all methods, and for a single lesion, size measurements spanned previously accepted definitions of clinically significant and insignificant disease. Inter-rater reliability decreased for larger lesions, with notable radiologist-specific differences, and intra-rater reliability appeared better overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the difficulty of reliably measuring PCa lesions during AS. Intra-rater reliability appeared greater than inter-rater reliability, emphasising that radiologists should remeasure lesions when tracking changes. More work is needed on measuring change in lesion size across serial MRI scans.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Several methods exist for measuring prostate cancer lesion size on MRI for patients on active surveillance, but it is unclear how reliable these methods are. Findings Lesion size measurements varied widely across methods and readers, often spanning thresholds for clinically significant disease, and intra-rater reliability was generally better than inter-rater reliability. Clinical relevance Variability in lesion size measurements on MRI may lead to inconsistent clinical decisions during active surveillance. Our findings emphasise that regardless of the method used, lesions should be remeasured by the same radiologist when monitoring patients on active surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1007/s00330-026-12345-6
Marlin A A Reijerink, Luna van den Brink, Michael M E L Henderickx, Otto M van Delden, Harrie P Beerlage, Axel Bex, Faridi S Jamaludin, Mitra Nekouei Shahraki, Patricia J Zondervan, Jaap Stoker
Objective: This systematic review aims to assess whether studies that followed the 2016 and updated 2024 European Association of Urology (EAU) Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) guidelines for CT during follow-up after tumor ablation (TA) yield different oncological outcomes compared to studies that performed more frequent imaging.
Materials and methods: A literature search of relevant search engines was performed up to June 6th, 2025. Studies that reported follow-up schedules of patients after TA for cT1 RCC were included. Studies utilizing more CT scans than recommended by the 2016 and 2024 EAU guidelines were compared with those adhering to the guidelines. Data on recurrences and survival were analyzed.
Results: Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, involving patients with cT1 RCC treated with TA. The mean 5-year overall survival rate was 82.9%. The pooled recurrence rate was 7.7% in studies that performed more imaging than recommended by the 2016 EAU guideline, compared with 12.3% in studies that adhered to the guideline (p = 0.19). All studies performed more imaging than recommended by the updated 2024 guidelines. Risk of bias was moderate to high in most studies.
Conclusion: The majority of included studies conducted more frequent imaging than advised by the 2016 EAU guidelines, with all studies exceeding the 2024 EAU guidelines. The studies included in our systematic review revealed similar oncological outcomes after TA, among studies that followed the 2016 EAU guidelines and those that performed more frequent imaging, suggesting that more frequent imaging than the 2016 EAU guidelines may not lead to a survival benefit.
Key points: Question Does more frequent follow-up CT imaging after tumor ablation for localized renal cell carcinoma improve oncological outcomes compared to European Association of Urology guideline recommendations? Findings 89% of studies performed more frequent CT scans than the 2016 guidelines; recurrence was 7.7% with extra scans versus 12.3% with guideline adherence. Clinical relevance Current intensive imaging protocols may not improve patient outcomes, supporting potential reduction in follow-up imaging frequency to minimize radiation exposure and healthcare costs while maintaining adequate oncological surveillance.
{"title":"The use of computed tomography during follow-up after ablation of cT1 renal cell carcinoma: evidence for overuse.","authors":"Marlin A A Reijerink, Luna van den Brink, Michael M E L Henderickx, Otto M van Delden, Harrie P Beerlage, Axel Bex, Faridi S Jamaludin, Mitra Nekouei Shahraki, Patricia J Zondervan, Jaap Stoker","doi":"10.1007/s00330-026-12345-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12345-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to assess whether studies that followed the 2016 and updated 2024 European Association of Urology (EAU) Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) guidelines for CT during follow-up after tumor ablation (TA) yield different oncological outcomes compared to studies that performed more frequent imaging.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature search of relevant search engines was performed up to June 6th, 2025. Studies that reported follow-up schedules of patients after TA for cT1 RCC were included. Studies utilizing more CT scans than recommended by the 2016 and 2024 EAU guidelines were compared with those adhering to the guidelines. Data on recurrences and survival were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, involving patients with cT1 RCC treated with TA. The mean 5-year overall survival rate was 82.9%. The pooled recurrence rate was 7.7% in studies that performed more imaging than recommended by the 2016 EAU guideline, compared with 12.3% in studies that adhered to the guideline (p = 0.19). All studies performed more imaging than recommended by the updated 2024 guidelines. Risk of bias was moderate to high in most studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of included studies conducted more frequent imaging than advised by the 2016 EAU guidelines, with all studies exceeding the 2024 EAU guidelines. The studies included in our systematic review revealed similar oncological outcomes after TA, among studies that followed the 2016 EAU guidelines and those that performed more frequent imaging, suggesting that more frequent imaging than the 2016 EAU guidelines may not lead to a survival benefit.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Does more frequent follow-up CT imaging after tumor ablation for localized renal cell carcinoma improve oncological outcomes compared to European Association of Urology guideline recommendations? Findings 89% of studies performed more frequent CT scans than the 2016 guidelines; recurrence was 7.7% with extra scans versus 12.3% with guideline adherence. Clinical relevance Current intensive imaging protocols may not improve patient outcomes, supporting potential reduction in follow-up imaging frequency to minimize radiation exposure and healthcare costs while maintaining adequate oncological surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1007/s00330-026-12366-1
Theresia Knoche, Nehir Guelsoy, Eberhard Siebert, Robin Hollinski, Leon Alexander Danyel
Objectives: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) primarily affects obese women of reproductive age. However, IIH can also occur in individuals outside this typical demographic, where it is associated with a more severe clinical course and poorer visual outcome. Characteristic features of IIH have been identified on cerebral MRI but have not been systematically studied in atypical patient subgroups.
Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study investigated the prevalence of MRI features of IIH across the following subgroups: males, individuals with normal BMI (< 26 kg/m2), and patients diagnosed above the age of 45. The presence of empty sella (ES), posterior globe flattening (PGF), optic nerve sheath distension (ONSD), optic nerve tortuosity (ONT), transverse sinus stenosis (TSS), DWI-hyperintensity of the optic nerve head (ONH) and ONH-contrast enhancement were evaluated on MRI. The relationship between MRI features and the visual prognosis was investigated.
Results: The study included 172 patients. ES was most frequent with 87%, followed by ONSD in 60%, TSS in 46%, ONT in 39% and PGF in 37%. ONH-DWI hyperintensity was present in 35%, and ONH-contrast enhancement in 22%. The prevalence of MRI features did not significantly differ across demographic subgroups and between atypical and typical IIH. Regression models did not indicate associations between MRI features and visual outcomes.
Conclusions: MRI features of IIH were equally prevalent in typical and atypical demographics. These findings suggest a consistent radiological presentation of IIH across demographic profiles, indicating a shared imaging phenotype regardless of atypical clinical characteristics. Limitations related to the retrospective design warrant future prospective studies.
Key points: Question Do MRI features of IIH differ across demographic subgroups (males, non-obese and older patients) and are they associated with visual outcomes? Findings MRI features of IIH were equally prevalent in typical and atypical patients; however, no significant association between imaging findings and visual outcome was observed. Clinical relevance While MRI supports the diagnosis of IIH across demographic subgroups, established imaging features do not seem to aid in identifying patients at risk of visual deterioration.
{"title":"MRI features in atypical idiopathic intracranial hypertension.","authors":"Theresia Knoche, Nehir Guelsoy, Eberhard Siebert, Robin Hollinski, Leon Alexander Danyel","doi":"10.1007/s00330-026-12366-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12366-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) primarily affects obese women of reproductive age. However, IIH can also occur in individuals outside this typical demographic, where it is associated with a more severe clinical course and poorer visual outcome. Characteristic features of IIH have been identified on cerebral MRI but have not been systematically studied in atypical patient subgroups.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study investigated the prevalence of MRI features of IIH across the following subgroups: males, individuals with normal BMI (< 26 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and patients diagnosed above the age of 45. The presence of empty sella (ES), posterior globe flattening (PGF), optic nerve sheath distension (ONSD), optic nerve tortuosity (ONT), transverse sinus stenosis (TSS), DWI-hyperintensity of the optic nerve head (ONH) and ONH-contrast enhancement were evaluated on MRI. The relationship between MRI features and the visual prognosis was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 172 patients. ES was most frequent with 87%, followed by ONSD in 60%, TSS in 46%, ONT in 39% and PGF in 37%. ONH-DWI hyperintensity was present in 35%, and ONH-contrast enhancement in 22%. The prevalence of MRI features did not significantly differ across demographic subgroups and between atypical and typical IIH. Regression models did not indicate associations between MRI features and visual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRI features of IIH were equally prevalent in typical and atypical demographics. These findings suggest a consistent radiological presentation of IIH across demographic profiles, indicating a shared imaging phenotype regardless of atypical clinical characteristics. Limitations related to the retrospective design warrant future prospective studies.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Do MRI features of IIH differ across demographic subgroups (males, non-obese and older patients) and are they associated with visual outcomes? Findings MRI features of IIH were equally prevalent in typical and atypical patients; however, no significant association between imaging findings and visual outcome was observed. Clinical relevance While MRI supports the diagnosis of IIH across demographic subgroups, established imaging features do not seem to aid in identifying patients at risk of visual deterioration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-05DOI: 10.1007/s00330-026-12335-8
Nicos Fotiadis, Sajjan Kc, Shaira Farooq, Jodie Basso, David Cunningham, Dow-Mu Koh, S Nahum Goldberg, Edward W Johnston
Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and technical performance of robot-assisted CT-guided cryoablation for pulmonary metastases.
Materials and methods: A single-centre IDEAL stage 2a prospective development study of 26 participants (median age 62 years, IQR 47-71; 14 men) who underwent 30 procedures targeting 37 lung metastases using a robotic navigation system. Median tumour diameter was 9.8 mm (IQR 5.1-12.8). All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia with high-frequency jet ventilation. Feasibility, safety, and technical performance (targeting accuracy, manipulations, radiation dose) were recorded.
Results: Robotic guidance was successfully completed without conversion in 35/37 tumours (95%). One major complication occurred (3%, CTCAE grade 3 pneumothorax requiring 4 days of drainage); all others were grade 1-2. Pneumothoraces were managed by observation (n = 7) or prophylactic intraprocedural chest drain insertion (n = 11). No bronchopleural fistulas were observed. Median hospital stay was 1 night (IQR 1-2). A total of 54 cryoprobes were used. Median Euclidean targeting error on first insertion was 6.1 mm (IQR 2.9-9.7) and lateral error 4.2 mm (IQR 2.2-6.5). The median number of manipulations per probe was 1 (IQR 0-2.5), with one-third requiring no adjustment. Once integrated into the workflow, the "chopstick" technique was frequently applied, supporting conformal ablation. Median total procedure time was 66.5 min (IQR 56.6-92.8). Twelve-month local tumour progression-free survival was 97%.
Conclusion: Robot-assisted CT-guided cryoablation of pulmonary metastases was feasible, safe, and accurate, achieving high targeting precision with minimal cryoprobe manipulation. These findings support evaluation in prospective comparative trials.
Key points: Question Robotic-assisted CT-guided cryoablation of lung metastases is feasible and safe, achieving high targeting accuracy and minimal probe manipulation, even in anatomically challenging cases. Findings Robotic trajectory planning supported complex multiprobe configurations. Procedural refinements-including patient positioning, probe selection, and adoption of "chopstick" configurations-were introduced to address bleeding risk and optimise energy delivery. Clinical relevance Robot-assisted navigation is particularly advantageous in cryoablation, enabling minimal manipulations and accurate probe placement despite the often-necessary complex trajectories.
目的:评价机器人辅助ct引导下肺转移冷冻消融的可行性、安全性和技术性能。材料和方法:一项单中心IDEAL 2a期前瞻性研究,26名参与者(中位年龄62岁,IQR 47-71; 14名男性)使用机器人导航系统进行了30次手术,针对37个肺转移瘤。肿瘤中位直径9.8 mm (IQR为5.1 ~ 12.8)。所有手术均在全身麻醉和高频喷射通气下进行。记录可行性、安全性和技术性能(瞄准精度、操作、辐射剂量)。结果:35/37例肿瘤(95%)成功完成机器人引导,无转化。发生1例主要并发症(3%,CTCAE 3级气胸需要4天引流);其他都是1-2年级。通过观察(n = 7)或术中预防性胸腔引流(n = 11)处理气胸。未见支气管胸膜瘘。中位住院时间为1晚(IQR 1-2)。共使用了54根冷冻探针。首次插入时的中位欧氏瞄准误差为6.1 mm (IQR 2.9-9.7),侧向误差为4.2 mm (IQR 2.2-6.5)。每个探针的操作次数中位数为1 (IQR 0-2.5),其中三分之一不需要调整。一旦整合到工作流程中,“筷子”技术就经常被应用,支持适形消融。中位总手术时间为66.5 min (IQR为56.6-92.8)。12个月局部肿瘤无进展生存率为97%。结论:机器人辅助ct引导肺转移瘤冷冻消融是可行、安全、准确的,以最小的冷冻探针操作实现了较高的靶向精度。这些发现支持前瞻性比较试验的评价。机器人辅助ct引导的肺转移冷冻消融是可行和安全的,即使在解剖学上具有挑战性的病例中,也能实现高靶向准确性和最小的探针操作。发现机器人轨迹规划支持复杂的多探针配置。程序上的改进——包括患者体位、探头选择和采用“筷子”配置——被引入以解决出血风险和优化能量输送。机器人辅助导航在冷冻消融中特别有利,尽管通常需要复杂的轨迹,但仍能实现最小的操作和准确的探针放置。
{"title":"Robot-assisted CT-guided cryoablation of pulmonary metastases: an IDEAL stage 2a prospective development study.","authors":"Nicos Fotiadis, Sajjan Kc, Shaira Farooq, Jodie Basso, David Cunningham, Dow-Mu Koh, S Nahum Goldberg, Edward W Johnston","doi":"10.1007/s00330-026-12335-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12335-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and technical performance of robot-assisted CT-guided cryoablation for pulmonary metastases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-centre IDEAL stage 2a prospective development study of 26 participants (median age 62 years, IQR 47-71; 14 men) who underwent 30 procedures targeting 37 lung metastases using a robotic navigation system. Median tumour diameter was 9.8 mm (IQR 5.1-12.8). All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia with high-frequency jet ventilation. Feasibility, safety, and technical performance (targeting accuracy, manipulations, radiation dose) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Robotic guidance was successfully completed without conversion in 35/37 tumours (95%). One major complication occurred (3%, CTCAE grade 3 pneumothorax requiring 4 days of drainage); all others were grade 1-2. Pneumothoraces were managed by observation (n = 7) or prophylactic intraprocedural chest drain insertion (n = 11). No bronchopleural fistulas were observed. Median hospital stay was 1 night (IQR 1-2). A total of 54 cryoprobes were used. Median Euclidean targeting error on first insertion was 6.1 mm (IQR 2.9-9.7) and lateral error 4.2 mm (IQR 2.2-6.5). The median number of manipulations per probe was 1 (IQR 0-2.5), with one-third requiring no adjustment. Once integrated into the workflow, the \"chopstick\" technique was frequently applied, supporting conformal ablation. Median total procedure time was 66.5 min (IQR 56.6-92.8). Twelve-month local tumour progression-free survival was 97%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robot-assisted CT-guided cryoablation of pulmonary metastases was feasible, safe, and accurate, achieving high targeting precision with minimal cryoprobe manipulation. These findings support evaluation in prospective comparative trials.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Robotic-assisted CT-guided cryoablation of lung metastases is feasible and safe, achieving high targeting accuracy and minimal probe manipulation, even in anatomically challenging cases. Findings Robotic trajectory planning supported complex multiprobe configurations. Procedural refinements-including patient positioning, probe selection, and adoption of \"chopstick\" configurations-were introduced to address bleeding risk and optimise energy delivery. Clinical relevance Robot-assisted navigation is particularly advantageous in cryoablation, enabling minimal manipulations and accurate probe placement despite the often-necessary complex trajectories.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146124439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}