首页 > 最新文献

European Radiology最新文献

英文 中文
Letter to the Editor: Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model based on multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for localising clinically significant prostate cancer by simulation of targeted biopsies. 致编辑的信:评估基于多参数经直肠超声的人工智能模型,通过模拟靶向活检来定位具有临床意义的前列腺癌。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-026-12339-4
Jelle Barentsz, Jos Immerzeel, Marloes van der Leest, Erik Cornel
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model based on multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for localising clinically significant prostate cancer by simulation of targeted biopsies.","authors":"Jelle Barentsz, Jos Immerzeel, Marloes van der Leest, Erik Cornel","doi":"10.1007/s00330-026-12339-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12339-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146149564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model based on multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for localizing clinically significant prostate cancer by simulation of targeted biopsies. 回复编辑:评价基于多参数经直肠超声的人工智能模型,通过模拟靶向活检来定位具有临床意义的前列腺癌。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-026-12342-9
D L van den Kroonenberg, A W Postema, H P Beerlage, J R Oddens
{"title":"Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model based on multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for localizing clinically significant prostate cancer by simulation of targeted biopsies.","authors":"D L van den Kroonenberg, A W Postema, H P Beerlage, J R Oddens","doi":"10.1007/s00330-026-12342-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12342-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146149555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What are RECIST 1.1 progressions made of? Variability in double-read oncology trials. RECIST 1.1级数是由什么组成的?双读肿瘤学试验的可变性。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-09 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-12234-4
Hubert Beaumont, Luca Cantini, Kamal S Saini, Nathalie Faye, Ritu Gill, Antoine Iannessi

Objective: Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) with double reads and adjudication is crucial in imaging-based clinical trials to ensure quality data. However, discrepancies in double reading can affect trial outcomes, particularly in assessing disease progression in phase 3 oncology studies using RECIST 1.1 criteria. This study examined discordance in the date of progressive disease (DoPD) across RECIST components: target lesion (TL), non-target lesion (nTL), new lesion (NL), exploring its impact on survival curves and whether discrepancies stem from timing differences or true/false PD detection.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from five clinical trials using BICR with double reads plus adjudication, involving 1932 lung cancer patients on immunotherapy or targeted therapy. RECIST components were examined to assess DoPD concordance, discrepancies, adjudicator acceptance, detection timing, and impact on survival curves.

Results: Readers showed a 39.3% discordance rate in DoPD assessments, with agreement on 17.3% of DoPD cases and 43.4% of non-PD cases. In 54.2% of concordant cases, multiple RECIST components contributed to PD. Discordance was primarily caused by NL (41.4%), sum of TL diameter increase (33.3%), nTL (11.8%), or multiple components (13.4%). In 49.2% of discrepant cases, PD was reported late, usually within one treatment cycle (79.8%). 62.5% of disputed PD cases were accepted by adjudication.

Conclusion: Different RECIST components vary in their likelihood of causing discordance and being accepted or refuted by adjudicators. NL detection is key for identifying progression but also the main source of disagreement. Using multiple RECIST components enhances the reliability of PD assessment.

Key points: Question How does discordance across RECIST components-especially new lesion detection-influence progression assessment timing and potentially alter survival outcomes in oncology clinical trials? Findings Reader disagreement on progression dates is common, driven mainly by new lesion detection; incorporating multiple RECIST components increases alignment and strengthens PD determination reliability. Clinical relevance Imaging endpoints guide cancer treatment decisions. RECIST 1.1 is the standard, inter-reader variability can undermine PFS accuracy. By evaluating RECIST component reliability, this work aims to improve trial precision, enabling faster, more confident decisions that ultimately benefit patients.

目的:双读和双评判的盲法独立中心评价(BICR)在基于影像的临床试验中是保证数据质量的关键。然而,双重读数的差异会影响试验结果,特别是在使用RECIST 1.1标准评估3期肿瘤研究的疾病进展时。本研究检查了RECIST组成部分中进展性疾病(DoPD)日期的不一致性:靶病变(TL),非靶病变(nTL),新病变(NL),探讨其对生存曲线的影响,以及差异是否源于时间差异或真/假PD检测。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了来自5个临床试验的数据,使用BICR进行双读加评判,涉及1932例接受免疫治疗或靶向治疗的肺癌患者。检查RECIST成分以评估DoPD一致性、差异、审查员接受度、检测时间和对生存曲线的影响。结果:读者对DoPD评估的不一致率为39.3%,对DoPD病例的一致率为17.3%,对非pd病例的一致率为43.4%。在54.2%的一致性病例中,多重RECIST成分导致PD。不一致主要由NL(41.4%)、TL直径增加总和(33.3%)、nTL(11.8%)或多组分(13.4%)引起。在49.2%的差异病例中,PD报告较晚,通常在一个治疗周期内(79.8%)。62.5%的PD争议案件被裁定受理。结论:不同的RECIST成分在引起不一致的可能性和被审查员接受或驳斥的可能性方面存在差异。NL检测是识别进展的关键,但也是分歧的主要来源。使用多个RECIST组件可提高PD评估的可靠性。在肿瘤临床试验中,不同RECIST成分(尤其是新病变检测)的不一致性如何影响进展评估时间,并可能改变生存结果?读者对进展日期的分歧很常见,主要是由于新病变的发现;结合多个RECIST组件增加对准和加强PD测定的可靠性。临床相关性影像学终点指导癌症治疗决策。RECIST 1.1是标准,阅读器之间的可变性会破坏PFS的准确性。通过评估RECIST组件的可靠性,这项工作旨在提高试验精度,实现更快、更自信的决策,最终使患者受益。
{"title":"What are RECIST 1.1 progressions made of? Variability in double-read oncology trials.","authors":"Hubert Beaumont, Luca Cantini, Kamal S Saini, Nathalie Faye, Ritu Gill, Antoine Iannessi","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-12234-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12234-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) with double reads and adjudication is crucial in imaging-based clinical trials to ensure quality data. However, discrepancies in double reading can affect trial outcomes, particularly in assessing disease progression in phase 3 oncology studies using RECIST 1.1 criteria. This study examined discordance in the date of progressive disease (DoPD) across RECIST components: target lesion (TL), non-target lesion (nTL), new lesion (NL), exploring its impact on survival curves and whether discrepancies stem from timing differences or true/false PD detection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from five clinical trials using BICR with double reads plus adjudication, involving 1932 lung cancer patients on immunotherapy or targeted therapy. RECIST components were examined to assess DoPD concordance, discrepancies, adjudicator acceptance, detection timing, and impact on survival curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Readers showed a 39.3% discordance rate in DoPD assessments, with agreement on 17.3% of DoPD cases and 43.4% of non-PD cases. In 54.2% of concordant cases, multiple RECIST components contributed to PD. Discordance was primarily caused by NL (41.4%), sum of TL diameter increase (33.3%), nTL (11.8%), or multiple components (13.4%). In 49.2% of discrepant cases, PD was reported late, usually within one treatment cycle (79.8%). 62.5% of disputed PD cases were accepted by adjudication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different RECIST components vary in their likelihood of causing discordance and being accepted or refuted by adjudicators. NL detection is key for identifying progression but also the main source of disagreement. Using multiple RECIST components enhances the reliability of PD assessment.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question How does discordance across RECIST components-especially new lesion detection-influence progression assessment timing and potentially alter survival outcomes in oncology clinical trials? Findings Reader disagreement on progression dates is common, driven mainly by new lesion detection; incorporating multiple RECIST components increases alignment and strengthens PD determination reliability. Clinical relevance Imaging endpoints guide cancer treatment decisions. RECIST 1.1 is the standard, inter-reader variability can undermine PFS accuracy. By evaluating RECIST component reliability, this work aims to improve trial precision, enabling faster, more confident decisions that ultimately benefit patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146149190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ESR Essentials: bone marrow MRI in oncology-practice recommendations by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology. ESR要点:骨髓MRI在肿瘤学的实践建议由欧洲肌肉骨骼放射学会。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-09 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-12307-4
Frédéric E Lecouvet, Lokmane Taihi, Thomas Kirchgesner, Vassiliki Pasoglou, Marin Halut, Hatice Tuba Sanal, Salvatore Gitto, Teodoro Martín-Noguerol, Violeta Vasilevska-Nikodinovska, Filip Vanhoenacker, Joan C Vilanova

Involvement of the bone marrow by metastases from solid tumors or multiple myeloma (MM) is a critical challenge in oncologic imaging. Lesion detection and staging, as well as accurate assessment of treatment response, disease recurrence, and complications, are key to optimal patient management. This article provides recommendations for performing and interpreting bone marrow MRI in cancer patients. MRI should be the primary imaging modality for patients suspected of having skeletal bone metastases or MM, and should replace radiography, bone scintigraphy, and CT for these indications. Protocols must be tailored to the clinical context and to each specific cancer. Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is preferred for a comprehensive assessment, while axial skeleton MRI (AS-MRI) is a fast and reliable alternative for targeted or follow-up evaluations. We recommend standardized protocols that incorporate anatomical sequences (preferably fast spin echo T2 Dixon) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Quantitative biomarkers, e.g., apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fat fraction (FF), should be implemented to improve diagnostic accuracy and evaluate treatment response. Radiologists must be familiar with the typical patterns of bone marrow replacement by cancer cells, response assessment principles, and common imaging pitfalls. Every medical imaging facility should offer optimal bone marrow MRI and implement these recommendations using available MRI systems and existing disease-oriented guidelines. This ESR Essentials illustrates when, how, and why to perform bone marrow MRI to improve diagnostic precision and oncologic care across a broad range of indications. KEY POINTS: Prefer MRI of the bone marrow over radiographs, bone scintigraphy, or CT for suspected bone metastases of solid cancers and for myeloma staging. Use MRI for diagnosis of bone involvement, disease staging, assessment of lesion response to treatment, detection of recurrence, and assessment of osseous complications. Tailor MRI protocol to cancer type following existing guidelines, targeting either the axial skeleton or the "whole body," and using a panel of sequences with fat-sensitive, fast spin echo T2 Dixon and diffusion-weighted sequences as the fundamental components.

实体瘤或多发性骨髓瘤(MM)转移瘤累及骨髓是肿瘤影像学的一个关键挑战。病变的检测和分期,以及治疗反应、疾病复发和并发症的准确评估,是优化患者管理的关键。本文提供了对癌症患者进行骨髓MRI检查和解释的建议。对于怀疑患有骨性骨转移或MM的患者,MRI应是主要的影像学检查方式,并应取代x线摄影、骨显像和CT检查这些适应症。治疗方案必须根据临床情况和每种特定的癌症进行调整。全身MRI (WB-MRI)是全面评估的首选,而轴向骨骼MRI (AS-MRI)是一种快速可靠的替代方案,用于靶向或随访评估。我们推荐标准化的方案,包括解剖序列(最好是快速自旋回声T2 Dixon)和弥散加权成像(DWI)。定量生物标志物,如表观扩散系数(ADC)和脂肪分数(FF),应实施提高诊断准确性和评估治疗反应。放射科医生必须熟悉骨髓被癌细胞替代的典型模式、反应评估原则和常见的成像陷阱。每个医学成像机构都应该提供最佳的骨髓MRI,并使用可用的MRI系统和现有的疾病导向指南来实施这些建议。本ESR要点说明了何时、如何以及为什么要在广泛的适应症中进行骨髓MRI以提高诊断精度和肿瘤护理。重点:对于可疑的实体癌骨转移和骨髓瘤分期,MRI优于x线片、骨显像或CT。使用MRI诊断骨受累、疾病分期、评估病变对治疗的反应、检测复发和评估骨并发症。根据现有指南,针对癌症类型定制MRI方案,针对轴向骨架或“全身”,并使用一组具有脂肪敏感、快速自旋回声T2 Dixon和扩散加权序列的序列作为基本组成部分。
{"title":"ESR Essentials: bone marrow MRI in oncology-practice recommendations by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology.","authors":"Frédéric E Lecouvet, Lokmane Taihi, Thomas Kirchgesner, Vassiliki Pasoglou, Marin Halut, Hatice Tuba Sanal, Salvatore Gitto, Teodoro Martín-Noguerol, Violeta Vasilevska-Nikodinovska, Filip Vanhoenacker, Joan C Vilanova","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-12307-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12307-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Involvement of the bone marrow by metastases from solid tumors or multiple myeloma (MM) is a critical challenge in oncologic imaging. Lesion detection and staging, as well as accurate assessment of treatment response, disease recurrence, and complications, are key to optimal patient management. This article provides recommendations for performing and interpreting bone marrow MRI in cancer patients. MRI should be the primary imaging modality for patients suspected of having skeletal bone metastases or MM, and should replace radiography, bone scintigraphy, and CT for these indications. Protocols must be tailored to the clinical context and to each specific cancer. Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is preferred for a comprehensive assessment, while axial skeleton MRI (AS-MRI) is a fast and reliable alternative for targeted or follow-up evaluations. We recommend standardized protocols that incorporate anatomical sequences (preferably fast spin echo T2 Dixon) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Quantitative biomarkers, e.g., apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fat fraction (FF), should be implemented to improve diagnostic accuracy and evaluate treatment response. Radiologists must be familiar with the typical patterns of bone marrow replacement by cancer cells, response assessment principles, and common imaging pitfalls. Every medical imaging facility should offer optimal bone marrow MRI and implement these recommendations using available MRI systems and existing disease-oriented guidelines. This ESR Essentials illustrates when, how, and why to perform bone marrow MRI to improve diagnostic precision and oncologic care across a broad range of indications. KEY POINTS: Prefer MRI of the bone marrow over radiographs, bone scintigraphy, or CT for suspected bone metastases of solid cancers and for myeloma staging. Use MRI for diagnosis of bone involvement, disease staging, assessment of lesion response to treatment, detection of recurrence, and assessment of osseous complications. Tailor MRI protocol to cancer type following existing guidelines, targeting either the axial skeleton or the \"whole body,\" and using a panel of sequences with fat-sensitive, fast spin echo T2 Dixon and diffusion-weighted sequences as the fundamental components.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146149505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unlocking the full potential of MRI with artificial intelligence for pre-operative meningioma evaluation. 利用人工智能释放MRI在脑膜瘤术前评估中的全部潜力。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-09 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-12317-2
Laurent Letourneau-Guillon
{"title":"Unlocking the full potential of MRI with artificial intelligence for pre-operative meningioma evaluation.","authors":"Laurent Letourneau-Guillon","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-12317-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12317-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146149522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The velocity challenge: MRI reveals highly variable prostate cancer growth rates in active surveillance. 速度挑战:MRI在主动监测中显示高度可变的前列腺癌生长速率。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-12312-7
Raphaële Renard-Penna
{"title":"The velocity challenge: MRI reveals highly variable prostate cancer growth rates in active surveillance.","authors":"Raphaële Renard-Penna","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-12312-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12312-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inter- and intra-rater variability of MRI-based lesion size measurements in active surveillance for prostate cancer: a multicentre study. 基于mri的病变大小测量在前列腺癌主动监测中的变异性:一项多中心研究。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-12318-1
Cameron Englman, Busola Adebusoye, Michele Cosenza, Andrea Del Prete, Louise Dickinson, Giulio Imperiale, Riccardo Leni, Giorgio Gandaglia, Francesco De Cobelli, Sue Mallett, Alex Kirkham, Caroline M Moore, Francesco Giganti, Giorgio Brembilla

Objectives: Prostate cancer (PCa) lesions can be measured on MRI using maximum or biaxial diameters, or as volumes derived by the ellipsoid formula or planimetry. We evaluated the inter- and intra-rater reliability (reliability between different radiologists and the same radiologist during different reading sessions) of lesion size measurements on baseline MRI scans for patients on active surveillance (AS).

Materials and methods: Twenty patients with low- or intermediate-risk PCa (Gleason score 3 + 3 or 3 + 4) and MRI-visible lesions were selected from AS cohorts at two centres (United Kingdom and Italy). Five radiologists, blinded to clinical outcomes and reports, independently measured the index lesion on a baseline MRI scan in a single reading session using: (1) maximum diameter; (2) biaxial diameters; (3) ellipsoid volume, and (4) planimetry volume. Measurements were repeated after a 4-week washout period. Strip plots present lesion size measurements for all methods and readers. Bland-Altman plots were used to present intra-rater reliability.

Results: Graphical presentation of measurements across the twenty patients enabled examination of variability between methods, readers, and reads. There was considerable variation for all methods, and for a single lesion, size measurements spanned previously accepted definitions of clinically significant and insignificant disease. Inter-rater reliability decreased for larger lesions, with notable radiologist-specific differences, and intra-rater reliability appeared better overall.

Conclusion: This study underscores the difficulty of reliably measuring PCa lesions during AS. Intra-rater reliability appeared greater than inter-rater reliability, emphasising that radiologists should remeasure lesions when tracking changes. More work is needed on measuring change in lesion size across serial MRI scans.

Key points: Question Several methods exist for measuring prostate cancer lesion size on MRI for patients on active surveillance, but it is unclear how reliable these methods are. Findings Lesion size measurements varied widely across methods and readers, often spanning thresholds for clinically significant disease, and intra-rater reliability was generally better than inter-rater reliability. Clinical relevance Variability in lesion size measurements on MRI may lead to inconsistent clinical decisions during active surveillance. Our findings emphasise that regardless of the method used, lesions should be remeasured by the same radiologist when monitoring patients on active surveillance.

目的:前列腺癌(PCa)病变可以在MRI上使用最大或双轴直径来测量,或者通过椭球公式或平面测量来测量体积。我们评估了主动监测(AS)患者的基线MRI扫描中病变大小测量的内部和内部可靠性(不同放射科医生和同一放射科医生在不同阅读时段之间的可靠性)。材料和方法:从两个中心(英国和意大利)的AS队列中选择20例低危或中危PCa (Gleason评分为3 + 3或3 + 4)和mri可见病变的患者。五名放射科医生,对临床结果和报告不知情,在一次阅读过程中独立测量基线MRI扫描上的指数病变,使用:(1)最大直径;(2)双轴直径;(3)椭球体体积,(4)平面体积。洗脱期4周后再次测量。条形图显示所有方法和阅读器的病变大小测量。Bland-Altman图用于表示组内信度。结果:20例患者测量结果的图形化呈现,能够检查方法、读取器和读取器之间的可变性。所有方法都有相当大的差异,对于单个病变,尺寸测量跨越了以前接受的临床显著性和不显著性疾病的定义。对于较大的病变,评分间可靠性降低,具有显著的放射科特异性差异,评分内可靠性总体上更好。结论:本研究强调了在AS期间可靠测量PCa病变的困难。评分内的可靠性高于评分间的可靠性,强调放射科医生在追踪变化时应该重新测量病变。在连续MRI扫描中测量病变大小的变化需要做更多的工作。目前有几种方法可用于主动监测患者在MRI上测量前列腺癌病变大小,但这些方法的可靠性尚不清楚。病变大小测量在不同的方法和读者之间差异很大,通常跨越临床重要疾病的阈值,评分内的可靠性通常优于评分间的可靠性。MRI上病变大小测量的变异性可能导致主动监测期间不一致的临床决策。我们的研究结果强调,无论使用何种方法,在对患者进行主动监测时,应由同一放射科医生重新测量病变。
{"title":"Inter- and intra-rater variability of MRI-based lesion size measurements in active surveillance for prostate cancer: a multicentre study.","authors":"Cameron Englman, Busola Adebusoye, Michele Cosenza, Andrea Del Prete, Louise Dickinson, Giulio Imperiale, Riccardo Leni, Giorgio Gandaglia, Francesco De Cobelli, Sue Mallett, Alex Kirkham, Caroline M Moore, Francesco Giganti, Giorgio Brembilla","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-12318-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12318-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) lesions can be measured on MRI using maximum or biaxial diameters, or as volumes derived by the ellipsoid formula or planimetry. We evaluated the inter- and intra-rater reliability (reliability between different radiologists and the same radiologist during different reading sessions) of lesion size measurements on baseline MRI scans for patients on active surveillance (AS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty patients with low- or intermediate-risk PCa (Gleason score 3 + 3 or 3 + 4) and MRI-visible lesions were selected from AS cohorts at two centres (United Kingdom and Italy). Five radiologists, blinded to clinical outcomes and reports, independently measured the index lesion on a baseline MRI scan in a single reading session using: (1) maximum diameter; (2) biaxial diameters; (3) ellipsoid volume, and (4) planimetry volume. Measurements were repeated after a 4-week washout period. Strip plots present lesion size measurements for all methods and readers. Bland-Altman plots were used to present intra-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Graphical presentation of measurements across the twenty patients enabled examination of variability between methods, readers, and reads. There was considerable variation for all methods, and for a single lesion, size measurements spanned previously accepted definitions of clinically significant and insignificant disease. Inter-rater reliability decreased for larger lesions, with notable radiologist-specific differences, and intra-rater reliability appeared better overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the difficulty of reliably measuring PCa lesions during AS. Intra-rater reliability appeared greater than inter-rater reliability, emphasising that radiologists should remeasure lesions when tracking changes. More work is needed on measuring change in lesion size across serial MRI scans.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Several methods exist for measuring prostate cancer lesion size on MRI for patients on active surveillance, but it is unclear how reliable these methods are. Findings Lesion size measurements varied widely across methods and readers, often spanning thresholds for clinically significant disease, and intra-rater reliability was generally better than inter-rater reliability. Clinical relevance Variability in lesion size measurements on MRI may lead to inconsistent clinical decisions during active surveillance. Our findings emphasise that regardless of the method used, lesions should be remeasured by the same radiologist when monitoring patients on active surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The use of computed tomography during follow-up after ablation of cT1 renal cell carcinoma: evidence for overuse. cT1肾细胞癌消融后随访期间计算机断层扫描的使用:过度使用的证据。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-026-12345-6
Marlin A A Reijerink, Luna van den Brink, Michael M E L Henderickx, Otto M van Delden, Harrie P Beerlage, Axel Bex, Faridi S Jamaludin, Mitra Nekouei Shahraki, Patricia J Zondervan, Jaap Stoker

Objective: This systematic review aims to assess whether studies that followed the 2016 and updated 2024 European Association of Urology (EAU) Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) guidelines for CT during follow-up after tumor ablation (TA) yield different oncological outcomes compared to studies that performed more frequent imaging.

Materials and methods: A literature search of relevant search engines was performed up to June 6th, 2025. Studies that reported follow-up schedules of patients after TA for cT1 RCC were included. Studies utilizing more CT scans than recommended by the 2016 and 2024 EAU guidelines were compared with those adhering to the guidelines. Data on recurrences and survival were analyzed.

Results: Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, involving patients with cT1 RCC treated with TA. The mean 5-year overall survival rate was 82.9%. The pooled recurrence rate was 7.7% in studies that performed more imaging than recommended by the 2016 EAU guideline, compared with 12.3% in studies that adhered to the guideline (p = 0.19). All studies performed more imaging than recommended by the updated 2024 guidelines. Risk of bias was moderate to high in most studies.

Conclusion: The majority of included studies conducted more frequent imaging than advised by the 2016 EAU guidelines, with all studies exceeding the 2024 EAU guidelines. The studies included in our systematic review revealed similar oncological outcomes after TA, among studies that followed the 2016 EAU guidelines and those that performed more frequent imaging, suggesting that more frequent imaging than the 2016 EAU guidelines may not lead to a survival benefit.

Key points: Question Does more frequent follow-up CT imaging after tumor ablation for localized renal cell carcinoma improve oncological outcomes compared to European Association of Urology guideline recommendations? Findings 89% of studies performed more frequent CT scans than the 2016 guidelines; recurrence was 7.7% with extra scans versus 12.3% with guideline adherence. Clinical relevance Current intensive imaging protocols may not improve patient outcomes, supporting potential reduction in follow-up imaging frequency to minimize radiation exposure and healthcare costs while maintaining adequate oncological surveillance.

目的:本系统综述旨在评估遵循2016年和更新的2024年欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)肾细胞癌(RCC)肿瘤消融(TA)后随访期间CT指南的研究与进行更频繁成像的研究相比,是否产生不同的肿瘤预后。材料与方法:通过相关搜索引擎进行文献检索,截止到2025年6月6日。研究报告了cT1型RCC患者接受TA治疗后的随访计划。使用比2016年和2024年EAU指南推荐的更多CT扫描的研究进行了比较。分析复发和生存数据。结果:37项研究符合纳入标准,包括接受TA治疗的cT1型RCC患者。平均5年总生存率为82.9%。在超过2016年EAU指南推荐的影像学检查的研究中,合并复发率为7.7%,而在遵守指南的研究中,合并复发率为12.3% (p = 0.19)。所有的研究都进行了比2024年更新指南建议的更多的影像学检查。在大多数研究中,偏倚风险为中等至高。结论:大多数纳入的研究比2016年EAU指南建议的更频繁地进行影像学检查,所有研究都超过了2024年EAU指南。我们的系统综述中纳入的研究显示,在遵循2016年EAU指南的研究和那些进行更频繁成像的研究中,TA后的肿瘤结果相似,这表明比2016年EAU指南更频繁的成像可能不会带来生存益处。与欧洲泌尿外科协会指南的建议相比,局部肾癌消融后更频繁的随访CT成像是否能改善肿瘤预后?89%的研究比2016年的指南更频繁地进行CT扫描;额外扫描的复发率为7.7%,而遵循指南的复发率为12.3%。目前的强化成像方案可能无法改善患者的预后,因此可能会降低随访成像频率,以最大限度地减少辐射暴露和医疗保健费用,同时保持适当的肿瘤监测。
{"title":"The use of computed tomography during follow-up after ablation of cT1 renal cell carcinoma: evidence for overuse.","authors":"Marlin A A Reijerink, Luna van den Brink, Michael M E L Henderickx, Otto M van Delden, Harrie P Beerlage, Axel Bex, Faridi S Jamaludin, Mitra Nekouei Shahraki, Patricia J Zondervan, Jaap Stoker","doi":"10.1007/s00330-026-12345-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12345-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to assess whether studies that followed the 2016 and updated 2024 European Association of Urology (EAU) Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) guidelines for CT during follow-up after tumor ablation (TA) yield different oncological outcomes compared to studies that performed more frequent imaging.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature search of relevant search engines was performed up to June 6th, 2025. Studies that reported follow-up schedules of patients after TA for cT1 RCC were included. Studies utilizing more CT scans than recommended by the 2016 and 2024 EAU guidelines were compared with those adhering to the guidelines. Data on recurrences and survival were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, involving patients with cT1 RCC treated with TA. The mean 5-year overall survival rate was 82.9%. The pooled recurrence rate was 7.7% in studies that performed more imaging than recommended by the 2016 EAU guideline, compared with 12.3% in studies that adhered to the guideline (p = 0.19). All studies performed more imaging than recommended by the updated 2024 guidelines. Risk of bias was moderate to high in most studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of included studies conducted more frequent imaging than advised by the 2016 EAU guidelines, with all studies exceeding the 2024 EAU guidelines. The studies included in our systematic review revealed similar oncological outcomes after TA, among studies that followed the 2016 EAU guidelines and those that performed more frequent imaging, suggesting that more frequent imaging than the 2016 EAU guidelines may not lead to a survival benefit.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Does more frequent follow-up CT imaging after tumor ablation for localized renal cell carcinoma improve oncological outcomes compared to European Association of Urology guideline recommendations? Findings 89% of studies performed more frequent CT scans than the 2016 guidelines; recurrence was 7.7% with extra scans versus 12.3% with guideline adherence. Clinical relevance Current intensive imaging protocols may not improve patient outcomes, supporting potential reduction in follow-up imaging frequency to minimize radiation exposure and healthcare costs while maintaining adequate oncological surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MRI features in atypical idiopathic intracranial hypertension. 不典型特发性颅内高压的MRI特征。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-026-12366-1
Theresia Knoche, Nehir Guelsoy, Eberhard Siebert, Robin Hollinski, Leon Alexander Danyel

Objectives: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) primarily affects obese women of reproductive age. However, IIH can also occur in individuals outside this typical demographic, where it is associated with a more severe clinical course and poorer visual outcome. Characteristic features of IIH have been identified on cerebral MRI but have not been systematically studied in atypical patient subgroups.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study investigated the prevalence of MRI features of IIH across the following subgroups: males, individuals with normal BMI (< 26 kg/m2), and patients diagnosed above the age of 45. The presence of empty sella (ES), posterior globe flattening (PGF), optic nerve sheath distension (ONSD), optic nerve tortuosity (ONT), transverse sinus stenosis (TSS), DWI-hyperintensity of the optic nerve head (ONH) and ONH-contrast enhancement were evaluated on MRI. The relationship between MRI features and the visual prognosis was investigated.

Results: The study included 172 patients. ES was most frequent with 87%, followed by ONSD in 60%, TSS in 46%, ONT in 39% and PGF in 37%. ONH-DWI hyperintensity was present in 35%, and ONH-contrast enhancement in 22%. The prevalence of MRI features did not significantly differ across demographic subgroups and between atypical and typical IIH. Regression models did not indicate associations between MRI features and visual outcomes.

Conclusions: MRI features of IIH were equally prevalent in typical and atypical demographics. These findings suggest a consistent radiological presentation of IIH across demographic profiles, indicating a shared imaging phenotype regardless of atypical clinical characteristics. Limitations related to the retrospective design warrant future prospective studies.

Key points: Question Do MRI features of IIH differ across demographic subgroups (males, non-obese and older patients) and are they associated with visual outcomes? Findings MRI features of IIH were equally prevalent in typical and atypical patients; however, no significant association between imaging findings and visual outcome was observed. Clinical relevance While MRI supports the diagnosis of IIH across demographic subgroups, established imaging features do not seem to aid in identifying patients at risk of visual deterioration.

目的:特发性颅内高压(IIH)主要影响育龄肥胖妇女。然而,IIH也可能发生在这一典型人群之外的个体中,在那里它与更严重的临床病程和较差的视力结果相关。脑MRI已经确定了IIH的特征,但尚未在非典型患者亚组中进行系统研究。材料和方法:本回顾性队列研究调查了IIH MRI特征在以下亚组中的患病率:男性、BMI正常的个体(2)和诊断年龄在45岁以上的患者。MRI检查有无鞍空(ES)、后球扁平(PGF)、视神经鞘扩张(ONSD)、视神经扭曲(ONT)、横窦狭窄(TSS)、视神经头dwi高信号(ONH)及ONH对比增强。探讨MRI表现与视觉预后的关系。结果:纳入172例患者。ES最常见(87%),其次是ONSD(60%)、TSS(46%)、ONT(39%)和PGF(37%)。35%表现为ONH-DWI高信号,22%表现为onh -对比度增强。MRI特征的患病率在人口统计学亚组之间以及在非典型和典型IIH之间没有显着差异。回归模型没有显示MRI特征和视觉结果之间的关联。结论:IIH的MRI特征在典型和非典型人群中同样普遍。这些发现表明,IIH的放射学表现在人口统计学上是一致的,表明无论非典型临床特征如何,都有共同的影像学表型。与回顾性设计相关的局限性保证了未来的前瞻性研究。IIH的MRI特征是否在人口统计学亚组(男性、非肥胖和老年患者)中有所不同?它们是否与视力结果相关?发现典型和非典型患者的MRI表现相同;然而,影像学结果和视觉结果之间没有明显的联系。虽然MRI支持跨人口亚组的IIH诊断,但已建立的影像学特征似乎无助于识别有视力恶化风险的患者。
{"title":"MRI features in atypical idiopathic intracranial hypertension.","authors":"Theresia Knoche, Nehir Guelsoy, Eberhard Siebert, Robin Hollinski, Leon Alexander Danyel","doi":"10.1007/s00330-026-12366-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12366-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) primarily affects obese women of reproductive age. However, IIH can also occur in individuals outside this typical demographic, where it is associated with a more severe clinical course and poorer visual outcome. Characteristic features of IIH have been identified on cerebral MRI but have not been systematically studied in atypical patient subgroups.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study investigated the prevalence of MRI features of IIH across the following subgroups: males, individuals with normal BMI (< 26 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and patients diagnosed above the age of 45. The presence of empty sella (ES), posterior globe flattening (PGF), optic nerve sheath distension (ONSD), optic nerve tortuosity (ONT), transverse sinus stenosis (TSS), DWI-hyperintensity of the optic nerve head (ONH) and ONH-contrast enhancement were evaluated on MRI. The relationship between MRI features and the visual prognosis was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 172 patients. ES was most frequent with 87%, followed by ONSD in 60%, TSS in 46%, ONT in 39% and PGF in 37%. ONH-DWI hyperintensity was present in 35%, and ONH-contrast enhancement in 22%. The prevalence of MRI features did not significantly differ across demographic subgroups and between atypical and typical IIH. Regression models did not indicate associations between MRI features and visual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRI features of IIH were equally prevalent in typical and atypical demographics. These findings suggest a consistent radiological presentation of IIH across demographic profiles, indicating a shared imaging phenotype regardless of atypical clinical characteristics. Limitations related to the retrospective design warrant future prospective studies.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Do MRI features of IIH differ across demographic subgroups (males, non-obese and older patients) and are they associated with visual outcomes? Findings MRI features of IIH were equally prevalent in typical and atypical patients; however, no significant association between imaging findings and visual outcome was observed. Clinical relevance While MRI supports the diagnosis of IIH across demographic subgroups, established imaging features do not seem to aid in identifying patients at risk of visual deterioration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robot-assisted CT-guided cryoablation of pulmonary metastases: an IDEAL stage 2a prospective development study. 机器人辅助ct引导肺转移冷冻消融:一项IDEAL 2a期前瞻性发展研究。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-026-12335-8
Nicos Fotiadis, Sajjan Kc, Shaira Farooq, Jodie Basso, David Cunningham, Dow-Mu Koh, S Nahum Goldberg, Edward W Johnston

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and technical performance of robot-assisted CT-guided cryoablation for pulmonary metastases.

Materials and methods: A single-centre IDEAL stage 2a prospective development study of 26 participants (median age 62 years, IQR 47-71; 14 men) who underwent 30 procedures targeting 37 lung metastases using a robotic navigation system. Median tumour diameter was 9.8 mm (IQR 5.1-12.8). All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia with high-frequency jet ventilation. Feasibility, safety, and technical performance (targeting accuracy, manipulations, radiation dose) were recorded.

Results: Robotic guidance was successfully completed without conversion in 35/37 tumours (95%). One major complication occurred (3%, CTCAE grade 3 pneumothorax requiring 4 days of drainage); all others were grade 1-2. Pneumothoraces were managed by observation (n = 7) or prophylactic intraprocedural chest drain insertion (n = 11). No bronchopleural fistulas were observed. Median hospital stay was 1 night (IQR 1-2). A total of 54 cryoprobes were used. Median Euclidean targeting error on first insertion was 6.1 mm (IQR 2.9-9.7) and lateral error 4.2 mm (IQR 2.2-6.5). The median number of manipulations per probe was 1 (IQR 0-2.5), with one-third requiring no adjustment. Once integrated into the workflow, the "chopstick" technique was frequently applied, supporting conformal ablation. Median total procedure time was 66.5 min (IQR 56.6-92.8). Twelve-month local tumour progression-free survival was 97%.

Conclusion: Robot-assisted CT-guided cryoablation of pulmonary metastases was feasible, safe, and accurate, achieving high targeting precision with minimal cryoprobe manipulation. These findings support evaluation in prospective comparative trials.

Key points: Question Robotic-assisted CT-guided cryoablation of lung metastases is feasible and safe, achieving high targeting accuracy and minimal probe manipulation, even in anatomically challenging cases. Findings Robotic trajectory planning supported complex multiprobe configurations. Procedural refinements-including patient positioning, probe selection, and adoption of "chopstick" configurations-were introduced to address bleeding risk and optimise energy delivery. Clinical relevance Robot-assisted navigation is particularly advantageous in cryoablation, enabling minimal manipulations and accurate probe placement despite the often-necessary complex trajectories.

目的:评价机器人辅助ct引导下肺转移冷冻消融的可行性、安全性和技术性能。材料和方法:一项单中心IDEAL 2a期前瞻性研究,26名参与者(中位年龄62岁,IQR 47-71; 14名男性)使用机器人导航系统进行了30次手术,针对37个肺转移瘤。肿瘤中位直径9.8 mm (IQR为5.1 ~ 12.8)。所有手术均在全身麻醉和高频喷射通气下进行。记录可行性、安全性和技术性能(瞄准精度、操作、辐射剂量)。结果:35/37例肿瘤(95%)成功完成机器人引导,无转化。发生1例主要并发症(3%,CTCAE 3级气胸需要4天引流);其他都是1-2年级。通过观察(n = 7)或术中预防性胸腔引流(n = 11)处理气胸。未见支气管胸膜瘘。中位住院时间为1晚(IQR 1-2)。共使用了54根冷冻探针。首次插入时的中位欧氏瞄准误差为6.1 mm (IQR 2.9-9.7),侧向误差为4.2 mm (IQR 2.2-6.5)。每个探针的操作次数中位数为1 (IQR 0-2.5),其中三分之一不需要调整。一旦整合到工作流程中,“筷子”技术就经常被应用,支持适形消融。中位总手术时间为66.5 min (IQR为56.6-92.8)。12个月局部肿瘤无进展生存率为97%。结论:机器人辅助ct引导肺转移瘤冷冻消融是可行、安全、准确的,以最小的冷冻探针操作实现了较高的靶向精度。这些发现支持前瞻性比较试验的评价。机器人辅助ct引导的肺转移冷冻消融是可行和安全的,即使在解剖学上具有挑战性的病例中,也能实现高靶向准确性和最小的探针操作。发现机器人轨迹规划支持复杂的多探针配置。程序上的改进——包括患者体位、探头选择和采用“筷子”配置——被引入以解决出血风险和优化能量输送。机器人辅助导航在冷冻消融中特别有利,尽管通常需要复杂的轨迹,但仍能实现最小的操作和准确的探针放置。
{"title":"Robot-assisted CT-guided cryoablation of pulmonary metastases: an IDEAL stage 2a prospective development study.","authors":"Nicos Fotiadis, Sajjan Kc, Shaira Farooq, Jodie Basso, David Cunningham, Dow-Mu Koh, S Nahum Goldberg, Edward W Johnston","doi":"10.1007/s00330-026-12335-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12335-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and technical performance of robot-assisted CT-guided cryoablation for pulmonary metastases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-centre IDEAL stage 2a prospective development study of 26 participants (median age 62 years, IQR 47-71; 14 men) who underwent 30 procedures targeting 37 lung metastases using a robotic navigation system. Median tumour diameter was 9.8 mm (IQR 5.1-12.8). All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia with high-frequency jet ventilation. Feasibility, safety, and technical performance (targeting accuracy, manipulations, radiation dose) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Robotic guidance was successfully completed without conversion in 35/37 tumours (95%). One major complication occurred (3%, CTCAE grade 3 pneumothorax requiring 4 days of drainage); all others were grade 1-2. Pneumothoraces were managed by observation (n = 7) or prophylactic intraprocedural chest drain insertion (n = 11). No bronchopleural fistulas were observed. Median hospital stay was 1 night (IQR 1-2). A total of 54 cryoprobes were used. Median Euclidean targeting error on first insertion was 6.1 mm (IQR 2.9-9.7) and lateral error 4.2 mm (IQR 2.2-6.5). The median number of manipulations per probe was 1 (IQR 0-2.5), with one-third requiring no adjustment. Once integrated into the workflow, the \"chopstick\" technique was frequently applied, supporting conformal ablation. Median total procedure time was 66.5 min (IQR 56.6-92.8). Twelve-month local tumour progression-free survival was 97%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robot-assisted CT-guided cryoablation of pulmonary metastases was feasible, safe, and accurate, achieving high targeting precision with minimal cryoprobe manipulation. These findings support evaluation in prospective comparative trials.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Robotic-assisted CT-guided cryoablation of lung metastases is feasible and safe, achieving high targeting accuracy and minimal probe manipulation, even in anatomically challenging cases. Findings Robotic trajectory planning supported complex multiprobe configurations. Procedural refinements-including patient positioning, probe selection, and adoption of \"chopstick\" configurations-were introduced to address bleeding risk and optimise energy delivery. Clinical relevance Robot-assisted navigation is particularly advantageous in cryoablation, enabling minimal manipulations and accurate probe placement despite the often-necessary complex trajectories.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146124439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Radiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1