Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-08-02DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2383865
Elizaveta Kon, Giuseppe Anzillotti, Pietro Conte, Luca Ruosi, Brian Cole, Jason Dragoo, Ken Zaslav, Rachel Frank, Laura De Girolamo, Bert Mandelbaum, Scott Rodeo, Maurilio Marcacci, Giuseppe Filardo, Berardo Di Matteo
Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent cause of disability worldwide, affecting millions and posing significant socioeconomic burdens. Various conservative measures like hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections aim to manage OA symptoms and delay surgical interventions. Despite the increasing utilization of PRP, consensus on its efficacy remains elusive, reflecting the evolving landscape of OA management.
Areas covered: This study reviews guidelines and recommendations on intra-articular PRP injections for OA globally, highlighting divergent perspectives among different medical societies. A comprehensive literature search identified 19 relevant guidelines, indicating a temporal and geographic evolution in attitudes toward PRP use. While some guidelines endorse PRP for mild-to-moderate OA, others express caution due to concerns about product standardization and clinical evidence heterogeneity.
Expert opinion: The lack of universal consensus on PRP for OA underscores the complex interplay between clinical evidence, practice patterns, and evolving perspectives. Recent shifts toward endorsing PRP may reflect advancements in preparation techniques and personalized medicine approaches. However, challenges persist, including patient selection and product standardization. Efforts to develop consensus and refine PRP classification systems are essential for guiding clinical practice and advancing OA management.
导言:骨关节炎(OA)是全世界普遍存在的致残原因,影响着数百万人,造成了巨大的社会经济负担。各种保守措施,如透明质酸(HA)和富血小板血浆(PRP)注射,旨在控制 OA 症状并延迟手术干预。尽管 PRP 的使用率越来越高,但人们对其疗效仍未达成共识,这反映了 OA 管理的不断变化:本研究回顾了全球范围内有关关节内注射 PRP 治疗 OA 的指南和建议,强调了不同医学协会之间的观点分歧。通过全面的文献检索,我们发现了 19 份相关指南,这表明人们对使用 PRP 的态度在时间和地域上发生了演变。一些指南认可 PRP 用于轻度至中度 OA,而另一些指南则对产品标准化和临床证据异质性表示谨慎:专家观点:对于PRP治疗OA缺乏普遍共识凸显了临床证据、实践模式和观点演变之间复杂的相互作用。最近对 PRP 的认可可能反映了制备技术和个性化医疗方法的进步。然而,挑战依然存在,包括患者选择和产品标准化。努力达成共识并完善 PRP 分类系统对于指导临床实践和推进 OA 管理至关重要。
{"title":"The chimera of reaching a universal consensus on platelet-rich plasma treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a review of recent consensus statements and expert opinion.","authors":"Elizaveta Kon, Giuseppe Anzillotti, Pietro Conte, Luca Ruosi, Brian Cole, Jason Dragoo, Ken Zaslav, Rachel Frank, Laura De Girolamo, Bert Mandelbaum, Scott Rodeo, Maurilio Marcacci, Giuseppe Filardo, Berardo Di Matteo","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2383865","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2383865","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent cause of disability worldwide, affecting millions and posing significant socioeconomic burdens. Various conservative measures like hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections aim to manage OA symptoms and delay surgical interventions. Despite the increasing utilization of PRP, consensus on its efficacy remains elusive, reflecting the evolving landscape of OA management.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This study reviews guidelines and recommendations on intra-articular PRP injections for OA globally, highlighting divergent perspectives among different medical societies. A comprehensive literature search identified 19 relevant guidelines, indicating a temporal and geographic evolution in attitudes toward PRP use. While some guidelines endorse PRP for mild-to-moderate OA, others express caution due to concerns about product standardization and clinical evidence heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The lack of universal consensus on PRP for OA underscores the complex interplay between clinical evidence, practice patterns, and evolving perspectives. Recent shifts toward endorsing PRP may reflect advancements in preparation techniques and personalized medicine approaches. However, challenges persist, including patient selection and product standardization. Efforts to develop consensus and refine PRP classification systems are essential for guiding clinical practice and advancing OA management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"827-833"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141787661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Growing attention has been drawn to urologic tumors due to their rising incidence and suboptimal clinical treatment outcomes. Cancer therapy resistance poses a significant challenge in clinical oncology, limiting the efficacy of conventional treatments and contributing to disease progression. Recent research has unveiled a complex interplay between the host microbiota and cancer cells, highlighting the role of the microbiota in modulating therapeutic responses.
Areas covered: We used the PubMed and Web of Science search engines to identify key publications in the fields of tumor progression and urologic tumor treatment, specifically focusing on the role of the microbiota. In this review, we summarize the current literature on how microbiota influence the tumor microenvironment and anti-tumor immunity, as well as their impact on treatments for urinary system malignancies, highlighting promising future applications.
Expert opinion: We explore how the composition and function of the gut microbiota influence the tumor microenvironment and immune response, ultimately impacting treatment outcomes. Additionally, we discuss emerging strategies targeting the microbiota to enhance therapeutic efficacy and overcome resistance. The application of antibiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and oncolytic bacteria has improved tumor treatment outcomes, which provides a novel insight into developing therapeutic strategies for urologic cancer.
导言:泌尿系统肿瘤的发病率不断上升,临床治疗效果却不尽如人意,因此越来越受到人们的关注。癌症耐药性是临床肿瘤学面临的一项重大挑战,它限制了传统治疗方法的疗效,并导致疾病进展。最近的研究揭示了宿主微生物群与癌细胞之间复杂的相互作用,突出了微生物群在调节治疗反应中的作用:我们使用 PubMed 和 Web of Science 搜索引擎来确定肿瘤进展和泌尿系统肿瘤治疗领域的主要出版物,特别关注微生物群的作用。在这篇综述中,我们总结了目前关于微生物群如何影响肿瘤微环境和抗肿瘤免疫的文献,以及它们对泌尿系统恶性肿瘤治疗的影响,并强调了未来有前景的应用:我们探讨了肠道微生物群的组成和功能如何影响肿瘤微环境和免疫反应,并最终影响治疗效果。此外,我们还讨论了针对微生物群以提高疗效和克服耐药性的新兴策略。抗生素、粪便微生物群移植和抗溶解细菌的应用改善了肿瘤治疗效果,这为开发泌尿系统癌症治疗策略提供了新的视角。
{"title":"Targeting gut and intratumoral microbiota: a novel strategy to improve therapy resistance in cancer with a focus on urologic tumors.","authors":"Bingquan Wu, Chao Quan, Yunbo He, Juliet Matsika, Jinliang Huang, Bolong Liu, Jinbo Chen","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2371543","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2371543","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Growing attention has been drawn to urologic tumors due to their rising incidence and suboptimal clinical treatment outcomes. Cancer therapy resistance poses a significant challenge in clinical oncology, limiting the efficacy of conventional treatments and contributing to disease progression. Recent research has unveiled a complex interplay between the host microbiota and cancer cells, highlighting the role of the microbiota in modulating therapeutic responses.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We used the PubMed and Web of Science search engines to identify key publications in the fields of tumor progression and urologic tumor treatment, specifically focusing on the role of the microbiota. In this review, we summarize the current literature on how microbiota influence the tumor microenvironment and anti-tumor immunity, as well as their impact on treatments for urinary system malignancies, highlighting promising future applications.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>We explore how the composition and function of the gut microbiota influence the tumor microenvironment and immune response, ultimately impacting treatment outcomes. Additionally, we discuss emerging strategies targeting the microbiota to enhance therapeutic efficacy and overcome resistance. The application of antibiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and oncolytic bacteria has improved tumor treatment outcomes, which provides a novel insight into developing therapeutic strategies for urologic cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"747-759"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141442390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2372367
Luca Mastorino, Irene Richiardi, Federica Gelato, Giovanni Cavaliere, Pietro Quaglino, Michela Ortoncelli, Simone Ribero
Background: There are currently limited data on dupilumab drug survival (DS), especially on factors possibly associated with drug discontinuation.
Materials and methods: The primary endpoint of this study is to evaluate the parameters that may determine drug discontinuation and the predictive factors associated with dupilumab DS. We considered as independent associated factors: childhood onset of disease, gender, age of onset of AD, age of initiation of dupilumab, previous use of cyclosporine, initial mean EASI, atopic family history, and predisposition to allergic conjunctivitis.
Results: On 413 patients DS was 94.5% at 1 year, 89.5% at 2 years, and 83.7% at 3 years, and after a mean follow-up of 40.5 months (±1.6) 53 patients had discontinued the drug permanently (12.8%). Univariate analysis showed that the only factor associated with a reduction in drug survival was a predisposition to allergic conjunctivitis (p 0.009). At multivariate Cox regression, male sex (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.14-4.78; p 0.02) and predisposition to allergic conjunctivitis (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.37-5.00; p 0.004) were associated with lower DS of dupilumab.
Conclusion: Male gender and predisposition to allergic conjunctivitis are negative predictors for maintenance of response to treatment with dupilumab and consequently associated with lower DS rates.
{"title":"Predisposition to conjunctivitis and male sex reduces drug survival of dupilumab in adults and adolescents.","authors":"Luca Mastorino, Irene Richiardi, Federica Gelato, Giovanni Cavaliere, Pietro Quaglino, Michela Ortoncelli, Simone Ribero","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2372367","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2372367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are currently limited data on dupilumab drug survival (DS), especially on factors possibly associated with drug discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The primary endpoint of this study is to evaluate the parameters that may determine drug discontinuation and the predictive factors associated with dupilumab DS. We considered as independent associated factors: childhood onset of disease, gender, age of onset of AD, age of initiation of dupilumab, previous use of cyclosporine, initial mean EASI, atopic family history, and predisposition to allergic conjunctivitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On 413 patients DS was 94.5% at 1 year, 89.5% at 2 years, and 83.7% at 3 years, and after a mean follow-up of 40.5 months (±1.6) 53 patients had discontinued the drug permanently (12.8%). Univariate analysis showed that the only factor associated with a reduction in drug survival was a predisposition to allergic conjunctivitis (p 0.009). At multivariate Cox regression, male sex (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.14-4.78; p 0.02) and predisposition to allergic conjunctivitis (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.37-5.00; p 0.004) were associated with lower DS of dupilumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Male gender and predisposition to allergic conjunctivitis are negative predictors for maintenance of response to treatment with dupilumab and consequently associated with lower DS rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"863-868"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141442389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-24DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2383882
Mohammad Shehab, Davide De Marco, Peter L Lakatos, Talat Bessissow
Introduction: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, relapsing immune mediated disease, which is one of the two major types of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Fistulizing CD poses a significant clinical challenge for physicians. Effective management of CD requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving a gastroenterologist and a GI surgeon while tailoring treatment to each patient's unique risk factors, clinical representations, and preferences.
Areas covered: This comprehensive review explores the intricacies of fistulizing CD including its manifestations, types, impact on quality of life, management strategies, and novel therapies under investigation.
Expert opinion: Antibiotics are often used as first-line therapy to treat symptoms. Biologics that selectively target TNF-α, such infliximab (IFX), have shown high efficacy in randomized controlled trials. However, more than 50% of patients lose response to IFX, prompting them to explore alternative strategies. Current options include adalimumab and certolizumab pegol combination therapies, as well as small-molecule drugs targeting Janus kinases such as Upadacitinib. Furthermore, a promising treatment for complex fistulas is mesenchymal stem cells such as Darvadstrocel (Alofisel), an allogeneic stem cell-based therapy. However, surgical interventions are necessary for complex cases or intra-abdominal complications. Setons and LIFT procedures are the most common surgical options.
简介克罗恩病(CD)是一种由免疫介导的慢性复发性疾病,是炎症性肠病(IBD)的两大类型之一。瘘性 CD 给医生带来了巨大的临床挑战。瘘性 CD 的有效治疗需要多学科方法,包括胃肠病学家和 G.I 外科医生,同时根据每位患者的独特风险因素、临床表现和偏好进行治疗:这篇综合综述探讨了瘘管病的复杂性,包括其表现、类型、对生活质量的影响、管理策略以及正在研究的新型疗法:抗生素通常被用作治疗症状的一线疗法。选择性针对TNF-α的生物制剂,如英夫利昔单抗(IFX),在随机对照试验中显示出很高的疗效。然而,超过50%的患者对IFX失去了反应,这促使他们探索替代策略。目前的选择包括阿达木单抗和certolizumab pegol联合疗法,以及针对Janus激酶的小分子药物,如Upadacitinib。此外,间充质干细胞也是治疗复杂性瘘管的一种很有前景的疗法,如Darvadstrocel(Alofisel),这是一种基于异体干细胞的疗法。不过,对于复杂病例或腹腔内并发症,必须进行手术干预。Setons和LIFT手术是最常见的手术选择。
{"title":"The potential for medical therapies to address fistulizing Crohn's disease: a state-of-the-art review.","authors":"Mohammad Shehab, Davide De Marco, Peter L Lakatos, Talat Bessissow","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2383882","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2383882","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, relapsing immune mediated disease, which is one of the two major types of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Fistulizing CD poses a significant clinical challenge for physicians. Effective management of CD requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving a gastroenterologist and a GI surgeon while tailoring treatment to each patient's unique risk factors, clinical representations, and preferences.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This comprehensive review explores the intricacies of fistulizing CD including its manifestations, types, impact on quality of life, management strategies, and novel therapies under investigation.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Antibiotics are often used as first-line therapy to treat symptoms. Biologics that selectively target TNF-α, such infliximab (IFX), have shown high efficacy in randomized controlled trials. However, more than 50% of patients lose response to IFX, prompting them to explore alternative strategies. Current options include adalimumab and certolizumab pegol combination therapies, as well as small-molecule drugs targeting Janus kinases such as Upadacitinib. Furthermore, a promising treatment for complex fistulas is mesenchymal stem cells such as Darvadstrocel (Alofisel), an allogeneic stem cell-based therapy. However, surgical interventions are necessary for complex cases or intra-abdominal complications. Setons and LIFT procedures are the most common surgical options.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"733-746"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141751466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-25DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2384000
Aliki I Venetsanopoulou, Paraskevi V Voulgari, Alexandros A Drosos
Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. While treatment options have expanded over the years, including the introduction of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) inhibitors (TNFi), optimizing withdrawal strategies for these agents remains a challenge.
Areas covered: This review examines the current evidence on TNFi withdrawal strategies in RA, focusing on factors influencing withdrawal decisions such as disease activity monitoring, treatment response, patient characteristics, and biomarkers. A comprehensive literature search was conducted, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and expert guidelines. The pathophysiology of RA, current pharmacological agents, and the treat-to-target strategy are discussed to provide a holistic understanding of RA management.
Expert opinion: Withdrawal strategies could be suitable for certain patients, keeping in mind that several factors influence withdrawal decisions, including treatment response, disease activity and monitoring, and patient characteristics. The decision to withdraw TNFi must balance the benefits against the potential risks of disease flare and long-term treatment-related adverse effects. Combining DMARDs and TNFi early improves outcomes, supporting tapering strategies for cost-effectiveness and flare prevention. Future directions, including precision medicine approaches, patient-centered care models, and health economics analyses, are proposed to further optimize RA management and improve patient outcomes.
{"title":"Optimizing withdrawal strategies for anti-TNF-α therapies in rheumatoid arthritis.","authors":"Aliki I Venetsanopoulou, Paraskevi V Voulgari, Alexandros A Drosos","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2384000","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2384000","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. While treatment options have expanded over the years, including the introduction of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) inhibitors (TNFi), optimizing withdrawal strategies for these agents remains a challenge.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines the current evidence on TNFi withdrawal strategies in RA, focusing on factors influencing withdrawal decisions such as disease activity monitoring, treatment response, patient characteristics, and biomarkers. A comprehensive literature search was conducted, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and expert guidelines. The pathophysiology of RA, current pharmacological agents, and the treat-to-target strategy are discussed to provide a holistic understanding of RA management.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Withdrawal strategies could be suitable for certain patients, keeping in mind that several factors influence withdrawal decisions, including treatment response, disease activity and monitoring, and patient characteristics. The decision to withdraw TNFi must balance the benefits against the potential risks of disease flare and long-term treatment-related adverse effects. Combining DMARDs and TNFi early improves outcomes, supporting tapering strategies for cost-effectiveness and flare prevention. Future directions, including precision medicine approaches, patient-centered care models, and health economics analyses, are proposed to further optimize RA management and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"815-825"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141758042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: In gene therapy with adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors for diseases of the central nervous system, the vectors can be administered into blood vessels, cerebrospinal fluid space, or the brain parenchyma. When gene transfer to a large area of the brain is required, the first two methods are used, but for diseases in which local gene transfer is expected to be effective, vectors are administered directly into the brain parenchyma.
Areas covered: Strategies for intraparenchymal vector delivery in gene therapy for Parkinson's disease, aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) deficiency, and epilepsy are reviewed.
Expert opinion: Stereotactic intraparenchymal injection of AAV vectors allows precise gene delivery to the target site. Although more surgically invasive than intravascular or intrathecal administration, intraparenchymal vector delivery has the advantage of a lower vector dose, and preexisting neutralizing antibodies have little effect on the transduction efficacy. This approach improves motor function in AADC deficiency and led to regulatory approval of an AAV vector for the disease in the EU. Although further validation through clinical studies is needed, direct infusion of viral vectors into the brain parenchyma is expected to be a novel treatment for Parkinson's disease and drug-resistant epilepsy.
{"title":"Intraparenchymal delivery of adeno-associated virus vectors for the gene therapy of neurological diseases.","authors":"Shinichi Kumagai, Takeshi Nakajima, Shin-Ichi Muramatsu","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2386339","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2386339","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In gene therapy with adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors for diseases of the central nervous system, the vectors can be administered into blood vessels, cerebrospinal fluid space, or the brain parenchyma. When gene transfer to a large area of the brain is required, the first two methods are used, but for diseases in which local gene transfer is expected to be effective, vectors are administered directly into the brain parenchyma.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Strategies for intraparenchymal vector delivery in gene therapy for Parkinson's disease, aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) deficiency, and epilepsy are reviewed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Stereotactic intraparenchymal injection of AAV vectors allows precise gene delivery to the target site. Although more surgically invasive than intravascular or intrathecal administration, intraparenchymal vector delivery has the advantage of a lower vector dose, and preexisting neutralizing antibodies have little effect on the transduction efficacy. This approach improves motor function in AADC deficiency and led to regulatory approval of an AAV vector for the disease in the EU. Although further validation through clinical studies is needed, direct infusion of viral vectors into the brain parenchyma is expected to be a novel treatment for Parkinson's disease and drug-resistant epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"773-785"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141787659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-08-27DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2389987
Giuseppe Lopalco, Andrea Cito, Vincenzo Venerito, Florenzo Iannone, Fabian Proft
Introduction: Axial involvement in spondyloarthritis has significantly evolved from the original 1984 New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis, leading to an improved understanding of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) as a disease continuum encompassing non- radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA). A clear definition for early axSpA has been established, underscoring the need for early intervention with biological and targeted synthetic drugs to mitigate pain, reduce functional impairment, and prevent radiographic progression.
Areas covered: This review explores therapeutic strategies in axSpA management, focusing on biological and targeted synthetic therapies and recent advancements. Biologics targeting TNFα or IL-17 and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are primary treatment options. These therapies significantly impact clinical outcomes, radiographic progression, and patient-reported functional improvement.
Expert opinion: AxSpA treatment has evolved significantly, offering various therapeutic options. Biological DMARDs, particularly TNFα inhibitors, have transformed treatment, significantly enhancing patient outcomes. However, challenges persist for patients unresponsive or intolerant to existing therapies. Emerging therapeutic targets promise to address these challenges. Comprehensive management strategies and personalized approaches, considering extra-articular manifestations and individual patient factors, are crucial for achieving optimal outcomes in axSpA management.
{"title":"The management of axial spondyloarthritis with cutting-edge therapies: advancements and innovations.","authors":"Giuseppe Lopalco, Andrea Cito, Vincenzo Venerito, Florenzo Iannone, Fabian Proft","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2389987","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2389987","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Axial involvement in spondyloarthritis has significantly evolved from the original 1984 New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis, leading to an improved understanding of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) as a disease continuum encompassing non- radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA). A clear definition for early axSpA has been established, underscoring the need for early intervention with biological and targeted synthetic drugs to mitigate pain, reduce functional impairment, and prevent radiographic progression.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review explores therapeutic strategies in axSpA management, focusing on biological and targeted synthetic therapies and recent advancements. Biologics targeting TNFα or IL-17 and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are primary treatment options. These therapies significantly impact clinical outcomes, radiographic progression, and patient-reported functional improvement.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>AxSpA treatment has evolved significantly, offering various therapeutic options. Biological DMARDs, particularly TNFα inhibitors, have transformed treatment, significantly enhancing patient outcomes. However, challenges persist for patients unresponsive or intolerant to existing therapies. Emerging therapeutic targets promise to address these challenges. Comprehensive management strategies and personalized approaches, considering extra-articular manifestations and individual patient factors, are crucial for achieving optimal outcomes in axSpA management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"835-853"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141897216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-29DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2384086
Daniel R Reed, Lawrence G Lum
Introduction: Since the approval of the bispecific antibody blinatumomab in 2017 for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in relapse, the development of numerous bispecific antibody constructs has dramatically expanded in hematologic malignancies. Many have recently received Food Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approvals in various stages of treatment for lymphomas, leukemias, and multiple myeloma.
Areas covered: The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of bispecific antibody treatment including the mechanisms leading to effector T cells targeting tumor-associated antigens, the treatment indications, efficacies, toxicities, and challenges of the different constructs. A literature search was performed through access to PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov.
Expert opinion: While there has been substantial success in the treatment of NHL, MM, and ALL, there are still hematologic malignancies such as AML where there has been limited progress. It is important to continue to investigate new designs, tumor antigen targets, and further refine where current approved bispecific antibodies fit in terms of sequencing of therapy. Hopefully, with the knowledge gained in recent years and the explosion of these therapies, patients with blood cancers will continue to benefit from these treatments for years to come.
导读:自2017年批准双特异性抗体blinatumomab用于治疗复发的急性淋巴细胞白血病以来,众多双特异性抗体构建体在血液学领域的发展急剧扩大:自2017年双特异性抗体blinatumomab获批用于治疗急性淋巴细胞白血病复发以来,众多双特异性抗体构建物在血液恶性肿瘤领域的发展急剧扩大。最近,许多双特异性抗体构建物在淋巴瘤、白血病和多发性骨髓瘤的不同治疗阶段获得了食品药品管理局和欧洲药品管理局的批准:本综述旨在概述双特异性抗体治疗,包括导致效应 T 细胞靶向肿瘤相关抗原的机制、不同构建物的治疗适应症、疗效、毒性和挑战。通过访问 PubMed 和 clinicaltrials.gov 进行了文献检索:虽然在治疗 NHL、MM 和 ALL 方面取得了巨大成功,但在治疗急性髓细胞性白血病等血液恶性肿瘤方面仍然进展有限。重要的是要继续研究新的设计、肿瘤抗原靶点,并进一步完善目前已批准的双特异性抗体在治疗排序方面的适应症。希望随着近年来知识的积累和这些疗法的蓬勃发展,血癌患者在未来的日子里能继续从这些疗法中获益。
{"title":"Looking ahead to CD3, T-cell engager bispecific antibodies for hematological malignancies.","authors":"Daniel R Reed, Lawrence G Lum","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2384086","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2384086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since the approval of the bispecific antibody blinatumomab in 2017 for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in relapse, the development of numerous bispecific antibody constructs has dramatically expanded in hematologic malignancies. Many have recently received Food Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approvals in various stages of treatment for lymphomas, leukemias, and multiple myeloma.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of bispecific antibody treatment including the mechanisms leading to effector T cells targeting tumor-associated antigens, the treatment indications, efficacies, toxicities, and challenges of the different constructs. A literature search was performed through access to PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>While there has been substantial success in the treatment of NHL, MM, and ALL, there are still hematologic malignancies such as AML where there has been limited progress. It is important to continue to investigate new designs, tumor antigen targets, and further refine where current approved bispecific antibodies fit in terms of sequencing of therapy. Hopefully, with the knowledge gained in recent years and the explosion of these therapies, patients with blood cancers will continue to benefit from these treatments for years to come.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"761-772"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141787660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-08-06DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2388186
Arturo Casadevall, Scott McConnell, Daniele Focosi
Introduction: Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies proved safe and effective in preventing progression of COVID-19 to hospitalization, but most were eventually defeated by continued viral evolution. mAb combinations and those mAbs that were deliberatively selected to target conserved regions of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein proved more resilient to viral escape variants as evident by longer clinical useful lives.
Areas covered: We searched PubMed for literature covering the need, development, and use of mAb therapies for COVID-19. As much of humanity now has immunity to SARS-CoV-2, the population at most risk is that of immunocompromised individuals. Hence, there continues to be a need for mAb therapies for immunocompromised patients. However, mAb use in this population carries the risk for selecting mAb-resistant variants, which could pose a public health concern if they disseminate to the general population.
Expert opinion: Going forward, structural knowledge of the interactions of Spike with its cellular receptor has identified several regions that may be good targets for future mAb therapeutics. A focus on designing variant-resistant mAbs together with cocktails that target several epitopes and the use of other variant mitigating strategies such as the concomitant use of small molecule antivirals and polyclonal preparations could extend the clinical usefulness of future preparations.
导言:单克隆抗体(mAb)疗法在预防COVID-19进展为住院治疗方面被证明是安全有效的,但大多数疗法最终都被持续的病毒进化所击败。mAb组合以及那些特意选择靶向SARS-CoV-2尖峰蛋白保守区域的mAb被证明对病毒逃逸变异具有更强的抵抗力,这一点从其更长的临床使用寿命中可以看出:我们在PubMed上搜索了有关COVID-19 mAb疗法的需求、开发和使用的文献。由于现在人类中的大多数人都对 SARS-CoV-2 具有免疫力,因此面临最大风险的人群是免疫力低下的人。因此,免疫力低下的患者仍然需要 mAb 疗法。然而,在这一人群中使用 mAb 有可能会产生耐 mAb 变异株,如果这些变异株扩散到普通人群中,就会引发公共卫生问题:展望未来,有关 Spike 与其细胞受体相互作用的结构知识已经确定了几个区域,这些区域可能是未来 mAb 疗法的良好靶点。重点设计抗变异的 mAb 以及针对多个表位的鸡尾酒,并使用其他减轻变异的策略,如同时使用小分子抗病毒药物和多克隆制剂,可以扩大未来制剂的临床用途。
{"title":"Considerations for the development of monoclonal antibodies to address new viral variants in COVID-19.","authors":"Arturo Casadevall, Scott McConnell, Daniele Focosi","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2388186","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2388186","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies proved safe and effective in preventing progression of COVID-19 to hospitalization, but most were eventually defeated by continued viral evolution. mAb combinations and those mAbs that were deliberatively selected to target conserved regions of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein proved more resilient to viral escape variants as evident by longer clinical useful lives.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We searched PubMed for literature covering the need, development, and use of mAb therapies for COVID-19. As much of humanity now has immunity to SARS-CoV-2, the population at most risk is that of immunocompromised individuals. Hence, there continues to be a need for mAb therapies for immunocompromised patients. However, mAb use in this population carries the risk for selecting mAb-resistant variants, which could pose a public health concern if they disseminate to the general population.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Going forward, structural knowledge of the interactions of Spike with its cellular receptor has identified several regions that may be good targets for future mAb therapeutics. A focus on designing variant-resistant mAbs together with cocktails that target several epitopes and the use of other variant mitigating strategies such as the concomitant use of small molecule antivirals and polyclonal preparations could extend the clinical usefulness of future preparations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"787-797"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141859373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-08-06DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2388193
Ramazan Emre Yiğit, Kadir Ulu, Şengül Çağlayan, Betül Sözeri
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETA) use in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).
Methods: The 24-month data of patients with JIA on etanercept in a single center were evaluated retrospectively. Response to treatment was assessed according to 10-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS10), and JIA-American College of Rheumatology (ACR) improvement criteria. Safety assessments were based on adverse event (AE) reports.
Results: The study included 152 patients with JIA. The mean age at diagnosis of JIA was 8.5 ± 4.4 years, and treatment with ETA started at a mean age of 11.1 ± 4.4 years. The mean duration of ETA use was 16 ± 11.1 months. The mean JADAS10 score at baseline was 18.5 ± 5.9. By the third month, it had reduced to 8.6 ± 6.6 and by the sixth month to 5.7 ± 6. By the twelfth month, the JADAS10 score was 4.9 ± 6.7, and by the twenty-fourth month, it had worsened to 7.3 ± 7.8. ACR50 response was achieved in 79.6% of patients at 3 months, 67.1% at 6 months, 79.3% at twelfth months, 70.7% at the twenty-fourth month. During ETA treatment, 10 patients required hospitalization for serious infections.
Conclusion: Etanercept is a safe and effective option for patients with JIA. However, variations in response between JIA subtypes highlight the need for individualized treatment strategies.
{"title":"Real-life data of etanercept efficacy and safety in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a 24-month retrospective study at a single center.","authors":"Ramazan Emre Yiğit, Kadir Ulu, Şengül Çağlayan, Betül Sözeri","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2388193","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2388193","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETA) use in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 24-month data of patients with JIA on etanercept in a single center were evaluated retrospectively. Response to treatment was assessed according to 10-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS10), and JIA-American College of Rheumatology (ACR) improvement criteria. Safety assessments were based on adverse event (AE) reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 152 patients with JIA. The mean age at diagnosis of JIA was 8.5 ± 4.4 years, and treatment with ETA started at a mean age of 11.1 ± 4.4 years. The mean duration of ETA use was 16 ± 11.1 months. The mean JADAS10 score at baseline was 18.5 ± 5.9. By the third month, it had reduced to 8.6 ± 6.6 and by the sixth month to 5.7 ± 6. By the twelfth month, the JADAS10 score was 4.9 ± 6.7, and by the twenty-fourth month, it had worsened to 7.3 ± 7.8. ACR50 response was achieved in 79.6% of patients at 3 months, 67.1% at 6 months, 79.3% at twelfth months, 70.7% at the twenty-fourth month. During ETA treatment, 10 patients required hospitalization for serious infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Etanercept is a safe and effective option for patients with JIA. However, variations in response between JIA subtypes highlight the need for individualized treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"855-862"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141859374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}