Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy最新文献

Objective: VOLTAIRE-HCLF compared the relative bioavailability of citrate-free high-concentration and reference formulations of the biosimilar adalimumab-adbm (Cyltezo®), including pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, immunogenicity, and safety profiles in healthy volunteers.

Methods: Healthy volunteers (N = 200) aged 18-55 years and with body mass index of 18.5-29.9 kg/m² and no prior exposure to adalimumab were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single subcutaneous injection of either adalimumab-adbm 40 mg/0.4 mL (high-concentration formulation) or 40 mg/0.8 mL (reference formulation). Participants completed 13 follow-up visits over 57 days, followed by a safety follow-up period of up to 70 days.

Results: The main PK parameters were similar for the high-concentration and reference groups. For all primary endpoints, the geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of AUC_0-1344, AUC_0-∞, and C_max for both groups were entirely within the standard 80-125% bioequivalence acceptance range at 101.88% (93.31-111.23%), 105.38% (95.06-116.81%), and 91.29% (84.38-98.76%), respectively. There were no differences in the proportion of anti-drug antibody-positive participants or in the distribution of anti-drug antibody titers between the two formulations at any time point after drug dosing. Participants who were given the high-concentration formulation of adalimumab-adbm experienced a lower incidence of adverse events and local reactions than those who were given the reference formulation.

Conclusions: Overall, the high-concentration and reference adalimumab-adbm formulations had highly similar PK and immunogenicity profiles and were safe and well tolerated.

Clinical trial registration: NCT05203289.

Purpose: Evaluate the type and quantity of quality information (i.e. Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control) requested by the US FDA and EMA in queries pertaining to biosimilar applications.

Methods: Numbers/types of queries received following regulatory submissions (FDA/EMA, n = 7/n = 5) for seven biosimilars (PF-filgrastim [Nivestym], PF-rituximab [Ruxience®], PF-trastuzumab [Trazimera®], PF-bevacizumab [Zirabev®], PF-pegfilgrastim [Nyvepria®], PF-adalimumab [Abrilada™/Amsparity®], PF-infliximab [Ixifi]) from a single product portfolio were analyzed considering published regulatory authority (RA) guidance and in relation to sections/subsections of Module 3: Quality from the Common Technical Document regulatory dossier and topics based on keyword assignment.

Results: Queries were most frequently assigned (FDA/EMA %, range) to Drug Substance Manufacture (subsection 3.2.S.2; 21-35%/13-50%), Control of Drug Substance (3.2.S.4; 3-11%/5-17%), Drug Product Pharmaceutical Development (3.2.P.2; 1-12%/1-15%) and Manufacture (3.2.P.3; 17-41%/2-13%), and Analytical Similarity (3.2.R; 4-21%/4-20%). The proportion of Drug Substance and Drug Product queries was significantly different between RAs (n1 = 952, n2 = 468, p-value <0.001; two-sample proportion z-test). Topic assignments included: Control (12-27%/12-28%), Manufacturing (56-72%/34-66%), Stability (1-12%/2-24%), Biosimilarity (5-16%/5-25%), and Container Closure (0-3%/0-9%).

Conclusion: The focus of both RAs on topics related to manufacturing and controls is valuable in understanding expectations for scientific and technical content related to gaining biosimilar approval.

Introduction: Infliximab (IFX) biosimilars are available to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), offering cost reductions versus originator IFX in some jurisdictions. However, concerns remain regarding the efficacy and safety of originator-to-biosimilar switching. This systematic literature review evaluated safety and effectiveness of switching between IFX products in patients with IBD, including multiple switchers.

Methods: Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to capture studies (2012-2022) including patients with IBD who switched between approved IFX products. Effectiveness outcomes: disease activity; disease severity; response to treatment; patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Safety outcomes: incidence and rate of adverse events (AEs); discontinuations due to AEs, failure rate; hospitalizations; surgeries. Immunogenicity outcomes (n, %): anti-drug antibodies; patients receiving concomitant immunomodulatory medication.

Results: Data from 85 publications (81 observational, two randomized controlled trials) were included. Clinical effectiveness outcomes were consistent with the known profile of originator IFX with no difference after switching. There were no unexpected/serious AEs after switching, and rates of AEs were generally consistent with the known profile of IFX.

Conclusions: Most studies reported that clinical, PROs, and safety outcomes for originator-to-biosimilar switching were clinically equivalent to originator responses. Limited data are available regarding multiple switches.

Protocol registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42021289144.

Background: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of MW031 in Chinese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Patients and methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial, 448 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 3:1 to receive MW031 and placebo for 12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change from baseline in BMD at lumbar spine in month 12. The safety and immunogenicity profiles were also included.

Results: Of 448 randomized patients, 421 completed the study (MW031, n = 322; placebo, n = 99).After 12 months of MW031 treatment, BMD increased by 5.80% at lumbar spine,3.65% at total hip, and 2.93% at femoral neck. The model-adjusted difference was 3.86% (P<0.0001), 2.34% (P<0.0001), and 1.05% (p = 0.08) compared with placebo group, respectively. For the bone turnover markers, serum CTX level in MW031 group decreased to the maximum difference in month 1 (-71.71%, 95% CI: -77.83%, -65.60%, P<0.0001) compared with the placebo group. The safety analysis showed no significant differences in the proportion of patients reporting any adverse events between the two groups.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that MW031 safely and effectively increased BMD and rapidly decreased the level of bone resorption marker in Chinese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Trial registration: NCT05215977 (ClinicalTrials.gov.).

Background: This study's objective was to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity and safety of denosumab biosimilar, CT‑P41, and United States-licensed reference denosumab (US-denosumab) in healthy male Asian adults, considering also pharmacodynamic (PD) outcomes.

Research design and methods: This double-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, Phase 1 study randomized (1:1) healthy males to a single (60-mg) subcutaneous dose of CT‑P41 or US-denosumab. Primary endpoints were area under the concentration - time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC_0-inf), AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC_0-last), and maximum serum concentration (C_max). PK equivalence was determined if 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for ratios of geometric least-squares means (gLSMs) were within the predefined 80-125% equivalence margin. Secondary PK, PD, safety, and immunogenicity outcomes were also evaluated.

Results: Of 154 participants randomized (76 CT‑P41; 78 US-denosumab), 151 received study drug (74 CT‑P41; 77 US-denosumab). Primary and secondary PK results, PD results, safety, and immunogenicity were comparable between groups. Ninety percent CIs for ratios of gLSMs were within the predefined equivalence margin for AUC_0-inf (100.4-114.7), AUC_0-last (99.9-114.3), and C_max (95.2-107.3).

Conclusions: Following a single dose in healthy males, CT‑P41 demonstrated PK equivalence with US-denosumab.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06037395.

Introduction: After 17 years on the market, biosimilar medicines have contributed significantly to the sustainability of healthcare in Spain, providing cost-effective treatment options and savings of more than €1 billion by 2022 alone. To fully exploit this potential and meet the European pharmaceutical strategy's objectives of increased access and a resilient supply chain, Member States need to optimize their biosimilars policies.

Areas covered: We conducted an exhaustive review of biosimilar medicines in Spain, first describing their regulatory framework. Biosimilar policies at both national and regional level have been collected and updated figures on the biosimilars market are provided based on official data. Knowledge and acceptance of biosimilar medicines among patients and medical societies based on biosimilar positioning documents is reviewed. National evidence on the contribution of biosimilars to savings and sustainability is also included in this study.

Expert opinion: In Spain, there is a need to further build confidence in biosimilars, develop a strong national biosimilars policy and address regional variability, improve public procurement and adapt clinical practice guidelines following the commercialization of biosimilars. By implementing a holistic and evidence-based policy, Spain can fully exploit the benefits of biosimilar medicines and ensure better and equitable access across the healthcare system.

Introduction: CAR T cells have generated great excitement due to their remarkable clinical response rates in selected hematologic malignancies. However, these engineered immune cells are living drugs which are hard to control after administration.

Areas covered: We discuss small molecule-regulated switch systems which can potentially be used to control CAR T cell function within the patient, as well as the most important obstacles in the CAR T cell field, which might be overcome with those switch systems.

Expert opinion: There is an urgent need to develop advanced switch systems. Once available, we expect that they will open up new avenues for future CAR T cell generations.

Introduction: The understanding of atopic dermatitis (AD) pathogenesis has rapidly expanded in recent years, catalyzing the development of new targeted monoclonal antibody treatments for AD.

Areas covered: This review aims to summarize the latest clinical and molecular data about monoclonal antibodies that are in later stages of development for AD, either in Phase 3 trials or in the pharmacopoeia for up to 5 years, highlighting the biologic underpinning of each drug's mechanism of action and the potential modulation of the AD immune profile.

Expert opinion: The therapeutic pipeline of AD treatments is speedily progressing, introducing the potential for a personalized medical approach in the near future. Understanding how targeting pathogenic players in AD modifies disease progression and symptomatology is key in improving therapeutic choices for patients and identifying ideal patient candidates.

Introduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a prevalent inflammatory condition with heterogenous underlying endotypes, the most common being type 2 mediated inflammation. Several biologics have been developed to target specific pro-inflammatory cytokines and their receptors with proven efficacy in both quantitative and qualitative outcomes in patients with severe uncontrolled disease. However, there is an ongoing debate on the role of biologics relative to conventional therapies for CRSwNP and their efficacy in patient subgroups with non-polyp type 2 disease.

Areas covered: This review examines the evidence on the efficacy and safety of biologics in CRSwNP, recommendations for their use, and discusses the broader economic factors influencing their application in clinical practice.

Expert opinion: Emerging real-life data demonstrating the variable efficacy of the available biologics for patients with CRSwNP, coupled with the high cost compared to conventional therapies such as surgery, renders biologics to be considered as an add-on therapy in the majority of cases. However, ongoing research into increasing biologic dose intervals and novel therapies targeting alternative pathways may offer a more cost-effective and sustainable option in future.

Introduction: Recombinant viral-based gene therapy products, such as those incorporating adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), fall under the category of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The European Union (EU) countries and Japan must obtain environmental risk assessment (ERA) approval for the use of GMOs before starting any clinical trials. It has been reported that the development of GMO-containing products in these two regions encounters several regulatory obstacles due to the longer regulatory procedures and document preparation for ERA.

Areas covered: In this article, we comparatively analyzed the ERA document requirements in the EU and Japan for AAV-based recombinant medicinal products to highlight the differences in the context of potential future attempts of convergence. Additionally, we analyzed non-clinical and clinical shedding data requirements, which are key components of ERA reviews in the EU and Japan. Lastly, we compared the containment measures to minimize the spread of GMOs in the environment in the EU and Japan.

Expert opinion: Based on our comparative analysis, we present several policy recommendations of standardizing and simplifying the application materials and procedures for the ERA regulations on GMOs in the EU and Japan in the mid-, and long-term timeframe to achieve global regulatory convergence.