Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy最新文献

Introduction: Following the CHAMPION-NMOSD trial, the FDA recently granted approval for ravulizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against complement C5 protein in AQP-4 seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Similar to eculizumab, ravulizumab offers near-complete prevention of NMOSD relapses, but has a longer half-life, providing decreased infusion frequency and increased convenience for patients. While targeting the complement pathway has clear advantages, patients are at risk for infection with encapsulated organisms, in particular Neisseria meningitidis.

Areas covered: In this paper, we discuss the details of the CHAMPION-NMOSD trial and discuss challenges in meningitis prevention and strategies for switching therapies.

Expert opinion: Ravulizumab improves on eculizumab's success as a highly effective NMOSD therapy by decreasing infusion frequency, thereby increasing patient convenience. We predict that ravulizumab will eventually replace eculizumab but may not have a similar impact on inebelizumab or satralizumab. Patients taking C5 complement inhibitors have an increased risk of serious meningococcal infections, such as invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), and have incomplete protection against IMD despite immunization. Thus, we recommend that in addition to standard pre-immunizations against Neisseria meningitidis, patients should also be assessed for starting on appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis against IMD, based on local resistance patterns.

Introduction: Locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) has poor prognosis. Preliminary clinical studies have demonstrated the synergistic efficacy of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in EC. Adjusting the radiotherapy target volume to protect immune function favors immunotherapy. However, there is no clear consensus on the exact definition of the EC target volume.

Areas covered: Preclinical studies have provided a wealth of information on immunotherapy combined with different radiotherapy modalities, and several clinical studies have evaluated the impact of immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy on locally advanced EC. Here, we illustrate the rational target volume delineation for radiotherapy in terms of patient prognosis, pattern of radiotherapy failure, treatment-related toxicities, tumor-draining lymph nodes, and systemic immunity and summarize the clinical trials of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in EC.

Expert opinion: We recommend applying involved-field irradiation (IFI) instead of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) for irradiated fields when immunotherapy is combined with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced EC. We expect that this target design will be evaluated in clinical trials to further explore more precise diagnostic modalities, long-term toxic responses, and quality of survival, and stratification factors for personalized treatment, and to provide more treatment benefits for patients.

Introduction: Perispinal etanercept (PSE) is an innovative treatment designed to improve stroke recovery by addressing chronic post-stroke neuroinflammation. Basic science evidence, randomized clinical trial (RCT) evidence and 14 years of favorable clinical experience support the use of PSE to treat chronic stroke. This article provides guidance for the design of future PSE RCTs in accordance with current FDA recommendations.

Areas covered: Scientific background and essential elements of PSE RCT design.

Expert opinion: Intimate familiarity with PSE, its novel method of drug delivery, and the characteristics of ideal enriched study populations are necessary for those designing future PSE stroke trials. The design elements needed to enable a PSE RCT to generate valid results include a suitable research question; a homogeneous study population selected using a prospective enrichment strategy; a primary outcome measure responsive to the neurological improvements that result from PSE; trialists with expertise in perispinal delivery; optimal etanercept dosing; and steps taken to minimize the number of placebo responders. RCTs failing to incorporate these elements, such as the PESTO trial, are incapable of reaching reliable conclusions regarding PSE efficacy. SF-36 has not been validated in PSE trials and is unsuitable for use as a primary outcome measure in PSE RCTs.

Introduction: Novel compounds have entered the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treatment algorithm, namely immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs), PARP inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). The optimization of treatment efficacy can be enhanced with the use of combination treatments, and the incorporation of novel compounds. In this review, we discuss the combination treatments under development for the treatment of TNBC.

Areas covered: The development of new drugs occurring in recent years has boosted the research for novel combinations to target TNBC heterogeneity and improve outcomes. ICIs, ADCs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and PARP inhibitors have emerged as leading players in this new landscape, while other compounds like novel intracellular pathways inhibitors or cancer vaccines are drawing more and more interest. The future of TNBC is outlined in combination approaches, and based on new cancer targets, including many chemotherapy-free treatments.

Expert opinion: A large number of TNBC therapies have either proved clinically ineffective or weighted by unacceptable safety profiles. Others, however, have provided promising results and are currently in late-stage clinical trials, while a few have actually changed clinical practice in recent years. As novel, more and more selective drugs come up, combination strategies focusing the concept of synergy are fully warranted for the future.

Introduction: Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) remains a prevalent cancer worldwide and its incidence is increasing in South America. The heterogenous nature of GAC makes advances in management challenging.

Areas covered: Despite challenges, recent therapeutic targets are individualizing treatment. For localized disease with microsatellite-instability-high/deficient mismatch repair, immunotherapy is now an adopted practice. In the advanced unresectable setting, those harboring human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) expression continue to be a separate entity.

Expert opinion: Future targets are developing. Among these include claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2), fibroblast growth factor receptor 2b (FGFR2b), and trophoblast cell surface antigen-2 (TROP-2). FDA approval of zolbetuximab's, an anti-CLDN 18.2 monoclonal antibody, is expected soon. Additionally, bemarituzumab, ananti-FGFR2b monoclonal antibody, has shown improvements in combination with chemotherapy in those with HER2 negative GAC with FGFR2 overexpression. This combination is now being investigated in a phase 3 trial. Lastly, TROP-2 has emerged as an exciting solid tumor target and study is expected in GAC. All three of these therapeutic targets have seen an abundance of drug development in recent years, and we anticipate newer targeted agents driving therapeutic decisions in GAC in the coming years.

Introduction: While surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment for resectable lung cancer, neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy has shown limited improvement in survival rates over the past decades. With the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced NSCLC, there is growing interest in their application in earlier stages of the disease. Recent approvals for neoadjuvant/adjuvant ICIs in stage II-IIIA NSCLC highlight this shift in treatment paradigms.

Areas covered: In this review, we aim to explore available data regarding alternative agents beyond the PD-(L)1 inhibitors, such as monoclonal antibodies against CTLA4, LAG3, TIGIT, antiangiogenic drugs, and novel therapies (antibody drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies) in neoadjuvant/perioperative regimens.

Expert opinion: Novel agents and combinations (with or without ICI or/and chemotherapy), guided by molecular profiling and immune phenotyping, showed promise in improving surgical and survival outcomes. Crucial is, also in early setting, to identifying biomarkers predictive of treatment efficacy in order to personalize neoadjuvant/perioperative treatment strategies.

Background: This study evaluated physicians' and patients' beliefs about biosimilars in Hong Kong, India, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand.

Research design and methods: An online survey administered to physicians (dermatologists, n = 119; gastroenterologists, n = 148; rheumatologists, n = 161) between 22 October 2021 and 7 January 2022, and patients (n = 90) with rheumatic or inflammatory bowel disease between 25 October 2021 and 12 April 2022.

Results: Most (68%) physicians reported having a strong knowledge about biosimilars, yet 49% indicated that biosimilars are readily available to them. Physicians cited potential cost savings (81%) as the main benefit of biosimilars, and cost/coverage support (36%), patient support (25%), and increasing biosimilar awareness/education (24%) as main strategies for improving usage. Few (21%) patients reported having a strong knowledge about biosimilars. Patients cited offering alternatives in case of drug shortages (77%) as the main benefit of biosimilars, and cost/coverage support (53%), increasing awareness of product profile (22%), and providing biosimilars with a good efficacy profile/effective product (19%) as main strategies for improving usage.

Conclusion: Programs focused on cost/coverage support, patient support, and biosimilar awareness could improve acceptance of biosimilars for chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in Asian countries, thereby increasing patient access to essential biologic therapies.

Introduction: In children, ulcerative colitis (UC) is often more severe and extensive than in adults and hospitalization for acute exacerbations occurs in around a quarter of subjects. There is a need for effective drugs, which could avoid or reduce the use of corticosteroids which, especially in children, are burdened by a number of severe side effects. The introduction in therapy of monoclonal antibodies has completely changed the therapeutic scenario and the prognosis of the disease.

Areas covered: In this review, the use of the monoclonal antibodies directed against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α or other inflammatory targets for the treatment of pediatric UC will be discussed. A search of the literature was done using the keywords 'pediatric,' 'ulcerative colitis,' 'inflammatory bowel disease,' 'monoclonal antibodies;' 'infliximab,' 'adalimumab,' 'golimumab,' vedolizumab," 'ustekinumab' and 'risankizumab.'

Expert opinion: The use of monoclonal antibodies has greatly increased in recent years in pediatric UC, both in patients who did not respond to conventional therapies, and, more often, as initial therapy. Thanks to therapeutic drug monitoring and to the availability of biologics with different targets, therapy has become more targeted and personalized, with a significant improvement in response, in quality of life, and with a good safety profile.

Introduction: Cervical cancer remains one of the most common gynecologic malignancies worldwide. A disproportionate burden of cases occurs in developing countries due to inadequate screening and treatment. Even among patients adequately treated, in the presence of locally advanced or recurrent disease, outcomes tend to be poor. The introduction of biologic therapy into treatment has increased overall survival; however, a considerable opportunity still exists to improve current standards in treatment. Biologics have shown antitumor activity in multiple tumor types and are actively being pursued for the management of cervical cancer.

Areas covered: In this article, we will discuss the historical evolution of biologic therapy in cervical cancer including use of angiogenesis inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and vaccines. We will review how these therapies have been integrated into current treatment recommendations and discuss ongoing investigations intended to improve clinical outcomes. We also postulate on persistent gaps in care.

Expert opinion: Biologic therapies have had a tremendous impact on our current approach to managing cervical cancer. We anticipate that significant more research and development will be committed to the continued investigation of biologics in cervical cancer in an effort to improve a historically difficult to treat malignancy.