Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy最新文献

Introduction: Approximately 50% of patients that receive a CGRP(r) MoAb for the preventative treatment of migraine are expected to discontinue therapy. For patients that discontinue CGRP(r) MoAb therapy, few clinical options are available. One potential option is to switch CGRP(r) MoAbs, however, data concerning the efficacy of this intervention is scarce.

Areas covered: This manuscript aims to summarize all available data concerning the potential efficacy of switching CGRP(r) MoAbs following previous medication discontinuation. Data was sourced by completing a database search for the terms: 'CGRP monoclonal antibody switch OR CGRP monoclonal antibody switching.'

Expert opinion: While data considering the potential efficacy of CGRP(r) switching continues to grow, our expert opinion supports the most recent European Headache Federation statement regarding CGRP(r) MoAb prescribing practices, concluding that there remains insufficient data to determine the efficacy of this intervention. As this topic is of significant clinical importance, we recommend a call-to-action to expand on current data considering the therapeutic options for patients that discontinue CGRP(r) MoAb therapy.

Introduction: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a BCMA-targeting CAR-T therapy, is approved in the United States and Europe for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and ≥1 prior line of therapy (LOT), including a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug, and are lenalidomide refractory.

Areas covered: We examine recent long-term data in heavily pretreated RRMM (LEGEND-2, CARTITUDE-1) and earlier LOTs (CARTITUDE-4) compared with standard therapy and discuss the rationale for investigating cilta-cel as frontline therapy for transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients (CARTITUDE-5, CARTITUDE-6).

Expert opinion: CAR-T therapies can improve outcomes for patients with MM across different LOTs. CARTITUDE-1 and CARTITUDE-4 have set a new bar for efficacy, with median PFS of 34.9 months in heavily pretreated patients (CARTITUDE-1) and a 74% relative risk reduction for progression/death versus standard care in patients with 1-3 prior LOTs (CARTITUDE-4), with manageable safety. Response rates were consistent between the two studies: 98% in CARTITUDE-1 and approaching 100% for infused patients in CARTITUDE-4. Cilta-cel could be a key treatment choice for patients with RRMM after first LOT. Clinical trials investigating frontline cilta-cel therapy will provide valuable insights into optimizing treatment pathways with the aim to potentially cure MM.

Introduction: Gain/amplification of 1q (+1q) represents one of the most prevalent cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) observed in multiple myeloma (MM). Historical studies predating the advent of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) implicated + 1q in poor prognoses, prompting its integration into novel staging systems. However, with the emergence of daratumumab and isatuximab, two pivotal anti-CD38 moAbs, the landscape of MM therapy has undergone a profound transformation.

Areas covered: This review encompasses a comprehensive analysis of diverse study methodologies, including observational investigations, clinical trials, meta-analyses, and real-world database analyses. By synthesizing these data sources, we aim to provide an overview of the current understanding of + 1q in the context of anti-CD38 moAbs therapies.

Expert opinion: Despite the paucity of available data, evidence suggests a potential mitigating effect of daratumumab on the adverse prognostic implications of + 1q. However, this benefit seems to diminish in patients harboring ≥ 4 copies or with concurrent high-risk CAs. On the other hand, isatuximab demonstrated promising outcomes in the relapsed-refractory setting for + 1q MM patients. Nevertheless, direct comparison between the two compounds is currently challenging. The current evidence firmly supports the integration of anti-CD38 moAb-based therapies as the standard of care for + 1q patients, pending further elucidation.

Background: Switch patterns among different biologics and from originators to biosimilars (and vice versa) can be complex in patients with psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe switching patterns of biological drugs in PsO/PsA patients and to explore predictors of multiple switches and switch-back.

Research design and methods: A large-scale retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Italian VALORE database. Bio-naïve users treated for PsO/PsA during 2010-2022 were included. Time to switch/swap and predictors of multiple switches and switch-back were analyzed.

Results: Thirty-thousand seven hundred bio-naïve users were included. At 3 and 5 years of follow-up, patients with at least one switch/swap were 37.1% and 47.8%, respectively. The median time to first switch/swap was significantly shorter (p< 0.001) for TNF-α inhibitors (2,068 days) than anti-IL (2,780 days). At 1 year of follow-up patients starting with IL-23 switched/swapped biological therapy less frequently than those with anti-IL-12/23 and anti-IL-17 (4.9% vs. 8.7% and 9.4%, respectively). Patients starting with anti-IL-12/23 reported a significantly lower risk of multiple switches and switch-back (0.74, 95% CI, 0.67-0.83; 0.58, 95% CI, 0.44-0.77, respectively) than those with TNF-α inhibitors.

Conclusions: Patients with PsO/PsA starting with TNF-α inhibitors switch/swap more rapidly and frequently than those with anti-IL, which are also associated with a reduced risk of multiple switches during follow-up.

Introduction: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) poses significant challenges, especially in pediatric and adolescent patients, impacting physical, emotional, and social well-being. Recent biologic breakthroughs offer promise, however, data on safety and efficacy in this population remain limited.

Areas covered: This review examines current biologic treatments in pediatrics and adolescents with CSU and explores the rapidly emerging landscape.

Expert opinion: Despite omalizumab's approval for allergic asthma in children since 2009, its delayed approval for CSU raises questions. Ligelizumab, a next-generation anti-IgE mAb, showed effectiveness in adults but lacks pediatric studies. CT-P39, a biosimilar to omalizumab, demonstrates promise, yet adolescent-specific outcomes are undisclosed. Dupilumab's recent approval for atopic dermatitis in children from 6 months onwards signifies progress. Expert opinion underscores the scarcity of controlled trials in pediatric and adolescent CSU, emphasizing the need for comprehensive studies. Age-specific data and collaboration are crucial for addressing research gaps and expanding indications for pediatric CSU treatment. The recently validated UAS7 parameter in children marks a milestone for prospective clinical trials. Despite challenges, the biology therapy outlook for pediatric and adolescent CSU is promising. Importantly, studies indicate that pediatric CSU is at least as prevalent as in adults, highlighting the need for approved treatments in this population.

Introduction: The prognosis for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients who did not respond or relapsed after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy remains dismal, with no established consensus on the most effective salvage regimen.

Methods: We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of complete response (CR) and overall response rates (ORR) to first-line treatments for CAR-T-relapsed/refractory LBCL. We followed the predefined protocol available at PROSPERO (CRD42023473854).

Results: We identified 41 studies evaluating the following interventions: non-CD19 CAR-T, CD19 CAR-T, bispecific antibodies (BiTEs), lenalidomide- and polatuzumab-based regimens, radiotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKi). Non-CD19 CAR-T cells yielded the best CR (56%, CI: 40-71%), significantly higher than other interventions except CD19 CAR-T (CR = 30%, CI: 7-58%). BiTEs, radiotherapy, lenalidomide- and polatuzumab-based regimens (CR: 28%, 26%, 19%, 24% respectively) did not differ significantly from each other. ICI and BTKi showed the lowest CR rates (12%, CI: 5-20% and 8%, CI: 0-23%, respectively), and were also significantly inferior to BiTEs. ORR was the highest for non-CD19 CAR-T (ORR = 80%, CI: 66-92%), whereas all other regimens yielded values below 50%.

Conclusions: Non-CD19 CAR-T cells were associated with higher response rates and should be considered if patients are eligible. Given the heterogeneity of the estimates, the results should be interpreted cautiously.

Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023473854.

Introduction: There is a need for new therapies that can enhance response rates and broaden the number of cancer indications where immunotherapies provide clinical benefit. CD40 targeting therapies provide an opportunity to meet this need by promoting priming of tumor-specific T cells and reverting the suppressive tumor microenvironment. This is supported by emerging clinical evidence demonstrating the benefits of immunotherapy with CD40 antibodies in combination with standard of care chemotherapy.

Areas covered: This review is focused on the coming wave of next-generation CD40 agonists aiming to improve efficacy and safety, using new approaches and formats beyond monospecific antibodies. Further, the current understanding of the role of different CD40 expressing immune cell populations in the tumor microenvironment is reviewed.

Expert opinion: There are multiple promising next-generation approaches beyond monospecific antibodies targeting CD40 in immuno-oncology. Enhancing efficacy is the most important driver for this development, and approaches that maximize the ability of CD40 to both remodel the tumor microenvironment and boost the anti-tumor T cell response provide great opportunities to benefit cancer patients. Enhanced understanding of the role of different CD40 expressing immune cells in the tumor microenvironment may facilitate more efficient clinical development of these compounds.