Pub Date : 2025-12-28DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2610267
Di Wu, Zirong Wang, Wei Yang, Fen Cheng, Jiaheng Li, Jianrong He, Ping Shi
Introduction: Bevacizumab and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) administered as maintenance therapies after platinum-based chemotherapy have shown a progression-free survival benefit in patients with ovarian cancer. However, there is no head-to-head trial comparing the quality of life (QOL) between bevacizumab and PARPi. We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare the QOL between bevacizumab and PARPi.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. were searched for trials reporting QOL in ovarian cancer treated with bevacizumab or PARPi. The primary outcome was the difference in QOL change between bevacizumab and PARPi.
Results: Eight RCTs with a total of 5822 participants were included in our analyses. We found no significant difference in QOL change between patients treated with bevacizumab and those treated with PARPi (SMD = -0.058, 95%CrI -0.431 to 0.331). Subgroup analyses stratified by treatment setting and BRCA status showed no significant influence on the network estimates.
Conclusions: Both bevacizumab and PARPi demonstrated no significant adverse effects on QOL when compared to standard chemotherapy. There was no clear superiority of one treatment over the other in terms of QOL. The acceptable QOL further supports the benefit of these maintenance treatments for ovarian cancer.
Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42024607491).
贝伐单抗和聚(adp -核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)作为铂基化疗后的维持治疗,显示卵巢癌患者的无进展生存期获益。然而,目前还没有比较贝伐单抗和PARPi之间生活质量(QOL)的正面试验。我们进行了贝叶斯网络meta分析,比较贝伐单抗和PARPi的生活质量。方法:PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov。检索了报告贝伐单抗或PARPi治疗卵巢癌患者生活质量的试验。主要结局是贝伐单抗和PARPi之间生活质量变化的差异。结果:8项随机对照试验共纳入5822名受试者。我们发现贝伐单抗治疗与PARPi治疗患者的生活质量变化无显著差异(SMD = -0.058, 95%CrI -0.431至0.331)。按治疗环境和BRCA状态分层的亚组分析显示,对网络估计没有显著影响。结论:与标准化疗相比,贝伐单抗和PARPi对生活质量均无明显不良影响。在生活质量方面,一种治疗没有明显的优势。可接受的生活质量进一步支持这些维持治疗对卵巢癌的益处。注册:普洛斯彼罗(CRD42024607491)。
{"title":"Quality of life in ovarian cancer patients receiving maintenance therapy with bevacizumab versus PARPi: a network meta-analysis.","authors":"Di Wu, Zirong Wang, Wei Yang, Fen Cheng, Jiaheng Li, Jianrong He, Ping Shi","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2610267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2610267","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bevacizumab and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) administered as maintenance therapies after platinum-based chemotherapy have shown a progression-free survival benefit in patients with ovarian cancer. However, there is no head-to-head trial comparing the quality of life (QOL) between bevacizumab and PARPi. We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare the QOL between bevacizumab and PARPi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. were searched for trials reporting QOL in ovarian cancer treated with bevacizumab or PARPi. The primary outcome was the difference in QOL change between bevacizumab and PARPi.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs with a total of 5822 participants were included in our analyses. We found no significant difference in QOL change between patients treated with bevacizumab and those treated with PARPi (SMD = -0.058, 95%CrI -0.431 to 0.331). Subgroup analyses stratified by treatment setting and BRCA status showed no significant influence on the network estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both bevacizumab and PARPi demonstrated no significant adverse effects on QOL when compared to standard chemotherapy. There was no clear superiority of one treatment over the other in terms of QOL. The acceptable QOL further supports the benefit of these maintenance treatments for ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42024607491).</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145849594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-28DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2610263
Taha Koray Sahin, Binura Makasheva, Deniz Can Guven, Sercan Aksoy, Vincenzo Di Lauro, Alessandro Rizzo
Introduction: Hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer is the most prevalent subtype and poses therapeutic challenges. While endocrine therapy remains the cornerstone of management, acquired resistance, particularly stemming from ESR1 mutations, limits long-term efficacy. Consequently, novel endocrine agents with enhanced potency, oral bioavailability, and favorable tolerability are crucial for overcoming resistance and improving patient outcomes.
Areas covered: This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of elacestrant, an orally active selective estrogen receptor degrader that has transformed the treatment paradigm for endocrine resistant disease. The pharmacologic properties, antitumor activity, and clinical outcomes associated with elacestrant are discussed in detail, along with ongoing research exploring its integration into combination regimens and in earlier disease settings.
Expert opinion: Elacestrant has become an important therapeutic option for patients with ESR1-mutated disease, offering durable estrogen receptor suppression and favorable tolerability. Combination therapies targeting CDK4/6 and PI3K-AKT-TOR signaling pathways represent promising directions for extending endocrine sensitivity. With the growing integration of liquid biopsy technologies and molecular monitoring into clinical practice, dynamic treatment adaptation guided by real time molecular profiling is expected to refine therapy selection. Elacestrant is a benchmark in the shift toward individualized endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer, bridging molecular precision with clinical practicality.
{"title":"Elacestrant in metastatic breast cancer: current advancements and future perspectives.","authors":"Taha Koray Sahin, Binura Makasheva, Deniz Can Guven, Sercan Aksoy, Vincenzo Di Lauro, Alessandro Rizzo","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2610263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2610263","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer is the most prevalent subtype and poses therapeutic challenges. While endocrine therapy remains the cornerstone of management, acquired resistance, particularly stemming from ESR1 mutations, limits long-term efficacy. Consequently, novel endocrine agents with enhanced potency, oral bioavailability, and favorable tolerability are crucial for overcoming resistance and improving patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of elacestrant, an orally active selective estrogen receptor degrader that has transformed the treatment paradigm for endocrine resistant disease. The pharmacologic properties, antitumor activity, and clinical outcomes associated with elacestrant are discussed in detail, along with ongoing research exploring its integration into combination regimens and in earlier disease settings.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Elacestrant has become an important therapeutic option for patients with ESR1-mutated disease, offering durable estrogen receptor suppression and favorable tolerability. Combination therapies targeting CDK4/6 and PI3K-AKT-TOR signaling pathways represent promising directions for extending endocrine sensitivity. With the growing integration of liquid biopsy technologies and molecular monitoring into clinical practice, dynamic treatment adaptation guided by real time molecular profiling is expected to refine therapy selection. Elacestrant is a benchmark in the shift toward individualized endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer, bridging molecular precision with clinical practicality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145849565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-28DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2610271
Ozgur Tanriverdi
Introduction: CRISPR-based genome editing and mRNA vaccine technologies have recently converged to offer new opportunities for precise and adaptable cancer immunotherapy. Their combined use may improve tumor antigenicity while enabling rapid induction of tailored immune responses.
Areas covered: This review examines how CRISPR-mediated modulation of oncogenic pathways, immune evasion mechanisms, and antigen presentation can enhance the efficacy of mRNA neoantigen vaccines. A structured literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (2013-2025) was conducted to identify preclinical and clinical studies evaluating CRISPR editing, mRNA cancer vaccines, and integrated combination strategies. Evidence from preclinical models demonstrates that CRISPR-driven tumor sensitization such as checkpoint disruption or antigen restoration amplifies T-cell responses elicited by mRNA vaccination. Early-phase clinical trials in melanoma, non - small-cell lung cancer, and pancreatic cancer indicate that sequential CRISPR editing followed by individualized mRNA vaccination is technically feasible and capable of inducing durable immune activity. Challenges related to delivery systems, safety oversight, and ethical considerations are also evaluated.
Expert opinion: CRISPR - mRNA integration represents a promising path toward adaptive, evolution-aware oncology. As delivery and regulatory frameworks advance, combined genome editing and programmable RNA immunotherapy is likely to become a key pillar of future personalized cancer treatment.
基于crispr的基因组编辑和mRNA疫苗技术最近融合在一起,为精确和适应性癌症免疫治疗提供了新的机会。它们的联合使用可以提高肿瘤抗原性,同时能够快速诱导量身定制的免疫反应。涵盖领域:本文综述了crispr介导的致癌途径、免疫逃避机制和抗原呈递如何增强mRNA新抗原疫苗的效力。使用PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus(2013-2025)进行结构化文献检索,以确定评估CRISPR编辑、mRNA癌症疫苗和综合联合策略的临床前和临床研究。来自临床前模型的证据表明,crispr驱动的肿瘤致敏,如检查点破坏或抗原恢复,放大了mRNA疫苗接种引发的t细胞反应。黑色素瘤、非小细胞肺癌和胰腺癌的早期临床试验表明,顺序CRISPR编辑和个体化mRNA疫苗接种在技术上是可行的,并且能够诱导持久的免疫活性。还评估了与交付系统、安全监督和道德考虑相关的挑战。专家意见:CRISPR - mRNA整合代表了一条通向适应性、进化意识肿瘤学的有希望的道路。随着递送和监管框架的进步,基因组编辑和可编程RNA免疫疗法的结合很可能成为未来个性化癌症治疗的关键支柱。
{"title":"CRISPR-mRNA synergy: toward adaptive cancer immunotherapy.","authors":"Ozgur Tanriverdi","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2610271","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2610271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>CRISPR-based genome editing and mRNA vaccine technologies have recently converged to offer new opportunities for precise and adaptable cancer immunotherapy. Their combined use may improve tumor antigenicity while enabling rapid induction of tailored immune responses.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines how CRISPR-mediated modulation of oncogenic pathways, immune evasion mechanisms, and antigen presentation can enhance the efficacy of mRNA neoantigen vaccines. A structured literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (2013-2025) was conducted to identify preclinical and clinical studies evaluating CRISPR editing, mRNA cancer vaccines, and integrated combination strategies. Evidence from preclinical models demonstrates that CRISPR-driven tumor sensitization such as checkpoint disruption or antigen restoration amplifies T-cell responses elicited by mRNA vaccination. Early-phase clinical trials in melanoma, non - small-cell lung cancer, and pancreatic cancer indicate that sequential CRISPR editing followed by individualized mRNA vaccination is technically feasible and capable of inducing durable immune activity. Challenges related to delivery systems, safety oversight, and ethical considerations are also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>CRISPR - mRNA integration represents a promising path toward adaptive, evolution-aware oncology. As delivery and regulatory frameworks advance, combined genome editing and programmable RNA immunotherapy is likely to become a key pillar of future personalized cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145818532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2606090
Subhrojyoti Mukherjee, Manish Kumar
Introduction: The CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) gene-editing tool provides novel therapeutic alternatives by promoting the gene alteration in adaptive T cells or malignant cells to combat Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). More successful cancer treatments are now possible due to the capacity of precisely locating and modifying particular genetic abnormalities that promote malignancy growth and metastasis.
Areas covered: In this review, we address ongoing clinical trials, the possible similarities between CRISPR-based cancer treatments and current therapeutic choices, and how CRISPR technology can improve treatment outcomes for HCC while using the latest safety measures. Additionally, this analysis sheds light on the existing obstacles and potential future possibilities of applying CRISPR technology to the management of HCC, with a final objective of enhancing patient results and completely changing the field of HCC therapies.
Expert opinion: The urgent need for innovative therapies is underscored by the poor prognosis associated with severe hepatocellular carcinoma, despite recent advancements in clinical therapies. Through a special emphasis on invivo cancer cell targeting along with the generation of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, including T cell receptor (TCR) T cells, this review analyses the uses of CRISPR methods in the therapy of HCC.
简介:CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats)基因编辑工具通过促进适应性T细胞或恶性细胞的基因改变来对抗肝细胞癌(HCC),提供了新的治疗选择。由于能够精确定位和修改促进恶性肿瘤生长和转移的特定基因异常,现在更成功的癌症治疗成为可能。涵盖领域:在本综述中,我们讨论了正在进行的临床试验,基于CRISPR的癌症治疗与当前治疗选择之间可能的相似性,以及CRISPR技术如何在使用最新安全措施的同时改善HCC的治疗结果。此外,该分析揭示了将CRISPR技术应用于HCC治疗的现有障碍和潜在的未来可能性,最终目标是提高患者的治疗效果,彻底改变HCC治疗领域。专家意见:尽管最近临床治疗取得了进展,但与严重肝细胞癌相关的不良预后强调了对创新疗法的迫切需求。通过特别强调体内癌细胞靶向以及嵌合抗原受体(CAR) T细胞(包括T细胞受体(TCR) T细胞)的产生,本文分析了CRISPR方法在HCC治疗中的应用。
{"title":"CRISPR: a precise genome editing strategy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Subhrojyoti Mukherjee, Manish Kumar","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2606090","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2606090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) gene-editing tool provides novel therapeutic alternatives by promoting the gene alteration in adaptive T cells or malignant cells to combat Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). More successful cancer treatments are now possible due to the capacity of precisely locating and modifying particular genetic abnormalities that promote malignancy growth and metastasis.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this review, we address ongoing clinical trials, the possible similarities between CRISPR-based cancer treatments and current therapeutic choices, and how CRISPR technology can improve treatment outcomes for HCC while using the latest safety measures. Additionally, this analysis sheds light on the existing obstacles and potential future possibilities of applying CRISPR technology to the management of HCC, with a final objective of enhancing patient results and completely changing the field of HCC therapies.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The urgent need for innovative therapies is underscored by the poor prognosis associated with severe hepatocellular carcinoma, despite recent advancements in clinical therapies. Through a special emphasis on invivo cancer cell targeting along with the generation of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, including T cell receptor (TCR) T cells, this review analyses the uses of CRISPR methods in the therapy of HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145762234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Comment on 'upper and lower limb cryotherapy as a preventive strategy for taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis'.","authors":"Arun Kumar, Chhaya Agarwal, Nivedita Nikhil Desai, Dhanya Dedeepya","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2607516","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2607516","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145780564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-21DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2604617
Sri Saran Manivasagam, Jay D Raman, Alireza Aminsharifi
Introduction: Bladder cancer is a prevalent and costly malignancy, with persistent challenges in early detection, accurate staging, and personalized treatment planning. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool with the potential to address these limitations across the bladder cancer continuum.
Areas covered: This review synthesizes findings from 49 studies selected through a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar spanning 2005 to 2025. The included studies explore AI applications in cystoscopic lesion detection, radiologic staging using CT and MRI, histopathologic grading, molecular biomarker profiling, treatment response prediction, and survival prognostication.
Expert opinion: AI has demonstrated significant promise in enhancing diagnostic precision, reducing interobserver variability, and enabling individualized treatment strategies. However, widespread clinical adoption remains limited due to challenges in data quality, lack of multicenter validation, integration into electronic health records, and regulatory hurdles. Future research should prioritize explainable AI models, prospective validation, and demonstration of cost-effectiveness and survival benefits. With continued innovation and standardization, AI is poised to become an integral component of precision oncology in bladder cancer care.
{"title":"Integrating artificial intelligence across the bladder cancer continuum: progress, promise, and pitfalls.","authors":"Sri Saran Manivasagam, Jay D Raman, Alireza Aminsharifi","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2604617","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2604617","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bladder cancer is a prevalent and costly malignancy, with persistent challenges in early detection, accurate staging, and personalized treatment planning. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool with the potential to address these limitations across the bladder cancer continuum.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review synthesizes findings from 49 studies selected through a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar spanning 2005 to 2025. The included studies explore AI applications in cystoscopic lesion detection, radiologic staging using CT and MRI, histopathologic grading, molecular biomarker profiling, treatment response prediction, and survival prognostication.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>AI has demonstrated significant promise in enhancing diagnostic precision, reducing interobserver variability, and enabling individualized treatment strategies. However, widespread clinical adoption remains limited due to challenges in data quality, lack of multicenter validation, integration into electronic health records, and regulatory hurdles. Future research should prioritize explainable AI models, prospective validation, and demonstration of cost-effectiveness and survival benefits. With continued innovation and standardization, AI is poised to become an integral component of precision oncology in bladder cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145755525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-21DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2604621
Aadi Zaragoza-Jiménez, Luis Fernando López-Lara, Evelyn Dennis Álvarez-Velázquez, Raúl Santiago Aceves-Enríquez, José Francisco Muñoz-Valle, Jorge Hernández-Bello, Mauricio Andrés Salinas-Santander, Alba Adriana Vallejo-Cardona, Clara Patricia Ríos-Ibarra
Introduction: Nanomedicine offers innovative and less invasive therapies by targeting key biological pathways through specific ligands, enhancing precision and minimizing adverse effects. Among nanocarriers, liposomes stand out for their dual aqueous-organic structure, which enables encapsulation of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds, improving drug stability and bioavailability.
Areas covered: Cancer remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide, with about 9.6 million deaths annually, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Despite advances in chemotherapy and radiotherapy, major challenges persist, including toxicity and multidrug resistance. Nanoparticles (NPs) have emerged as promising tools for cancer therapy, acting through direct tumor targeting, modulation of the tumor microenvironment, and activation of immune responses. This review summarizes recent preclinical and clinical findings on liposomal formulations used against breast, liver, pancreatic, and prostate cancers, focusing on their therapeutic potential and translational progress.
Expert opinion: Liposome performance depends on molecular surface modifications using carbohydrates, proteins, peptides, aptamers, or monoclonal antibodies. These functionalized liposomes enable ligand-receptor recognition, facilitating endocytosis and controlled intracellular drug release. Consequently, targeted liposomal systems achieve higher specificity and reduced systemic toxicity compared with passively delivered formulations.
{"title":"Liposomal nanomedicine in cancer therapy: advances in drug delivery.","authors":"Aadi Zaragoza-Jiménez, Luis Fernando López-Lara, Evelyn Dennis Álvarez-Velázquez, Raúl Santiago Aceves-Enríquez, José Francisco Muñoz-Valle, Jorge Hernández-Bello, Mauricio Andrés Salinas-Santander, Alba Adriana Vallejo-Cardona, Clara Patricia Ríos-Ibarra","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2604621","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2604621","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nanomedicine offers innovative and less invasive therapies by targeting key biological pathways through specific ligands, enhancing precision and minimizing adverse effects. Among nanocarriers, liposomes stand out for their dual aqueous-organic structure, which enables encapsulation of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds, improving drug stability and bioavailability.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Cancer remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide, with about 9.6 million deaths annually, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Despite advances in chemotherapy and radiotherapy, major challenges persist, including toxicity and multidrug resistance. Nanoparticles (NPs) have emerged as promising tools for cancer therapy, acting through direct tumor targeting, modulation of the tumor microenvironment, and activation of immune responses. This review summarizes recent preclinical and clinical findings on liposomal formulations used against breast, liver, pancreatic, and prostate cancers, focusing on their therapeutic potential and translational progress.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Liposome performance depends on molecular surface modifications using carbohydrates, proteins, peptides, aptamers, or monoclonal antibodies. These functionalized liposomes enable ligand-receptor recognition, facilitating endocytosis and controlled intracellular drug release. Consequently, targeted liposomal systems achieve higher specificity and reduced systemic toxicity compared with passively delivered formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145755481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-21DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2604165
Gabriel Dapueto, Inés Pereira, Lucía D'Andrea, Magdalena Schelotto, Anaulina Silveira, Gertjan Kaspers, Luis Castillo
Background: Outcomes for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have improved substantially in high-income countries through advances in therapy, supportive care, and risk stratification. In Uruguay, results remain poorer despite adopting international protocols. This study evaluates clinical features and outcomes of pediatric AML in Uruguay, establishing a baseline before implementation of the CHIP-AML22 protocol in 2025.
Research design and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the National Pediatric Cancer Registry. Patients under 18 years diagnosed with AML between January 2008 and December 2024 were included. Treatment followed St. Jude AML08 and CLCN-UK 2016 protocols. High-risk or relapsed patients received allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Results: Ninety-two patients were diagnosed with AML, including 7 with Down syndrome and 19 with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Among 66 AML patients, excluding DS and APL, induction failure occurred in 24% (12% early death, 12% refractory disease), relapse in 24%, and treatment-related mortality accounted for 73% of deaths. Five-year overall survival was 50% and event-free survival 38%.
Conclusions: Pediatric AML survival in Uruguay remains below international benchmarks, mainly due to treatment-related mortality during induction. Implementation of CHIP-AML22, together with stronger induction management and supportive care, offers opportunities to improve survival and narrow this gap.
{"title":"Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia in Uruguay: clinical outcomes and diagnostic challenges in a national cohort (2008-2024).","authors":"Gabriel Dapueto, Inés Pereira, Lucía D'Andrea, Magdalena Schelotto, Anaulina Silveira, Gertjan Kaspers, Luis Castillo","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2604165","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2604165","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcomes for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have improved substantially in high-income countries through advances in therapy, supportive care, and risk stratification. In Uruguay, results remain poorer despite adopting international protocols. This study evaluates clinical features and outcomes of pediatric AML in Uruguay, establishing a baseline before implementation of the CHIP-AML22 protocol in 2025.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the National Pediatric Cancer Registry. Patients under 18 years diagnosed with AML between January 2008 and December 2024 were included. Treatment followed St. Jude AML08 and CLCN-UK 2016 protocols. High-risk or relapsed patients received allogeneic stem cell transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two patients were diagnosed with AML, including 7 with Down syndrome and 19 with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Among 66 AML patients, excluding DS and APL, induction failure occurred in 24% (12% early death, 12% refractory disease), relapse in 24%, and treatment-related mortality accounted for 73% of deaths. Five-year overall survival was 50% and event-free survival 38%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric AML survival in Uruguay remains below international benchmarks, mainly due to treatment-related mortality during induction. Implementation of CHIP-AML22, together with stronger induction management and supportive care, offers opportunities to improve survival and narrow this gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2604616
Gustavo Nader Marta, Orit Kaidar-Person, Icro Meattini, Philip Poortmans
Introduction: The integration of primary systemic therapy (PST) into breast cancer management increasingly shapes locoregional treatment. Rising pathological complete response rates and improved survival have fueled interest in radiation therapy (RT) de-escalation to limit late toxicity while preserving oncological control. Yet the risk of undertreatment and its delayed consequences remains a major concern.
Areas covered: This article appraises evidence supporting response-adapted RT de-escalation after PST. We review key prospective and retrospective studies, including RAPCHEM and NSABP/B-51, outlining their methodological strengths, limitations, and clinical relevance. Evidence was identified through a focused narrative review of major clinical trials, pooled analyses, and meta-analyses addressing locoregional management in the post-PST setting. We further discuss how contemporary systemic therapies, evolving surgery, molecular profiling, and technological advances in RT inform individualized decision-making.
Expert opinion: Early data suggest that RT de-escalation may be feasible for carefully selected patients, but current evidence does not justify unrestricted omission of RT in all pathological complete responders. Decisions should remain grounded in long-term outcomes, accurate pre-treatment staging, and robust validation of predictive biomarkers. Until such evidence matures, RT de-escalation should be undertaken cautiously - preferably within clinical trials or prospective registries and following multidisciplinary review - to minimize the risk of inadvertent locoregional undertreatment.
{"title":"De-escalating locoregional radiation therapy in breast cancer: balancing promises and prudence.","authors":"Gustavo Nader Marta, Orit Kaidar-Person, Icro Meattini, Philip Poortmans","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2604616","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2604616","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The integration of primary systemic therapy (PST) into breast cancer management increasingly shapes locoregional treatment. Rising pathological complete response rates and improved survival have fueled interest in radiation therapy (RT) de-escalation to limit late toxicity while preserving oncological control. Yet the risk of undertreatment and its delayed consequences remains a major concern.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article appraises evidence supporting response-adapted RT de-escalation after PST. We review key prospective and retrospective studies, including RAPCHEM and NSABP/B-51, outlining their methodological strengths, limitations, and clinical relevance. Evidence was identified through a focused narrative review of major clinical trials, pooled analyses, and meta-analyses addressing locoregional management in the post-PST setting. We further discuss how contemporary systemic therapies, evolving surgery, molecular profiling, and technological advances in RT inform individualized decision-making.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Early data suggest that RT de-escalation may be feasible for carefully selected patients, but current evidence does not justify unrestricted omission of RT in all pathological complete responders. Decisions should remain grounded in long-term outcomes, accurate pre-treatment staging, and robust validation of predictive biomarkers. Until such evidence matures, RT de-escalation should be undertaken cautiously - preferably within clinical trials or prospective registries and following multidisciplinary review - to minimize the risk of inadvertent locoregional undertreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145755486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2604618
Marcio J Concepción-Zavaleta, Jenyfer M Fuentes-Mendoza, Alfredo Cruz-Quintá, Argelia V Cadena-Guerrero, Ximena Barrón, Luis Concepción-Urteaga, Cristian D Armas, José Paz-Ibarra, Juan Eduardo Quiroz-Aldave
Introduction: Thyroid cancer management is shifting from morphology-based assessment to precision oncology driven by integrated molecular profiling and computational analytics. This review examines how these advances address overdiagnosis, indeterminate cytology, and radioiodine-refractory disease.
Areas covered: We synthesize recent evidence on multi-analyte next-generation sequencing panels, the prognostic impact of co-occurring mutations, characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment, and therapeutic innovations (targeted agents and immunomodulatory strategies). We also summarize applications of artificial intelligence in ultrasound, cytology, and text mining. Literature was identified through structured searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science for English-language studies published between January 2020 and June 2024, prioritizing original research, clinical trials, meta-analyses, and high-quality reviews.
Expert opinion: The field is converging toward an integrated framework that combines genomic architecture, immune contexture, and AI-derived features to refine surgical decisions, guide radioactive iodine use, and select systemic therapy. Near-term priorities include standardizing multi-omic pipelines, validating AI across diverse populations, and expanding access to testing, while emerging tools such as liquid biopsy and patient-derived organoids are poised to enable adaptive, patient-specific management.
简介:甲状腺癌的管理正在从基于形态学的评估转向由综合分子分析和计算分析驱动的精确肿瘤学。这篇综述探讨了这些进展如何解决过度诊断、不确定细胞学和放射性碘难治性疾病。涵盖的领域:我们综合了新一代多分析物测序面板、共发生突变的预后影响、肿瘤免疫微环境的表征和治疗创新(靶向药物和免疫调节策略)的最新证据。我们还总结了人工智能在超声、细胞学和文本挖掘方面的应用。通过对2020年1月至2024年6月期间发表的PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus和Web of Science的英语研究进行结构化搜索,确定文献,优先考虑原始研究、临床试验、荟萃分析和高质量评论。专家意见:该领域正朝着整合基因组结构、免疫环境和人工智能衍生特征的综合框架发展,以完善手术决策、指导放射性碘的使用和选择全身治疗。近期的优先事项包括标准化多组学管道,在不同人群中验证人工智能,扩大测试的可及性,而液体活检和患者来源的类器官等新兴工具有望实现适应性的、针对患者的管理。
{"title":"Molecular intelligence and immune reconnaissance in thyroid cancer: a new paradigm for diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic precision.","authors":"Marcio J Concepción-Zavaleta, Jenyfer M Fuentes-Mendoza, Alfredo Cruz-Quintá, Argelia V Cadena-Guerrero, Ximena Barrón, Luis Concepción-Urteaga, Cristian D Armas, José Paz-Ibarra, Juan Eduardo Quiroz-Aldave","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2604618","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2604618","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thyroid cancer management is shifting from morphology-based assessment to precision oncology driven by integrated molecular profiling and computational analytics. This review examines how these advances address overdiagnosis, indeterminate cytology, and radioiodine-refractory disease.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We synthesize recent evidence on multi-analyte next-generation sequencing panels, the prognostic impact of co-occurring mutations, characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment, and therapeutic innovations (targeted agents and immunomodulatory strategies). We also summarize applications of artificial intelligence in ultrasound, cytology, and text mining. Literature was identified through structured searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science for English-language studies published between January 2020 and June 2024, prioritizing original research, clinical trials, meta-analyses, and high-quality reviews.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The field is converging toward an integrated framework that combines genomic architecture, immune contexture, and AI-derived features to refine surgical decisions, guide radioactive iodine use, and select systemic therapy. Near-term priorities include standardizing multi-omic pipelines, validating AI across diverse populations, and expanding access to testing, while emerging tools such as liquid biopsy and patient-derived organoids are poised to enable adaptive, patient-specific management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145755494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}