Introduction: In aural rehabilitation, speech bananas are often used as a counseling tool to visually indicate one's auditory access to speech sounds. We constructed a Chinese-based speech banana to provide Chinese-speaking users with a more appropriate distribution of Chinese speech sounds on an audiogram.
Method: The location of each phoneme was defined by its frequency and intensity. To evaluate the clinical validity of the proposed speech banana, 15 Chinese-speaking hearing aid users were recruited; the predictability of the present speech banana was examined in terms of sensitivity and specificity based on their aided sound-field narrow-band noise thresholds and speech recognition thresholds.
Results: The data revealed high specificity rates of 94.2% below 8,000 Hz and high sensitivity of 96.8% above 8,000 Hz. Specificity measures the percentage of perceptible sounds correctly identified as such by the Chinese speech banana (CSB); sensitivity measures the percentage of imperceptible sounds that are correctly identified as such by the CSB.
Discussion/conclusion: The CSB represents a potentially valid counseling tool to identify phonemes that have poor perceptual quality and indicate auditory access gaps.
{"title":"Audiogram of Chinese Phonemes: Construction and Evaluation.","authors":"Yu-Chen Hung, Chun-Yi Lin","doi":"10.1159/000526031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In aural rehabilitation, speech bananas are often used as a counseling tool to visually indicate one's auditory access to speech sounds. We constructed a Chinese-based speech banana to provide Chinese-speaking users with a more appropriate distribution of Chinese speech sounds on an audiogram.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The location of each phoneme was defined by its frequency and intensity. To evaluate the clinical validity of the proposed speech banana, 15 Chinese-speaking hearing aid users were recruited; the predictability of the present speech banana was examined in terms of sensitivity and specificity based on their aided sound-field narrow-band noise thresholds and speech recognition thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data revealed high specificity rates of 94.2% below 8,000 Hz and high sensitivity of 96.8% above 8,000 Hz. Specificity measures the percentage of perceptible sounds correctly identified as such by the Chinese speech banana (CSB); sensitivity measures the percentage of imperceptible sounds that are correctly identified as such by the CSB.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>The CSB represents a potentially valid counseling tool to identify phonemes that have poor perceptual quality and indicate auditory access gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":"75 1","pages":"43-51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10785181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Hearing loss is a neglected global health priority affecting 1.5 billion persons. Global access to hearing care is severely limited with management options, like hearing aids, inaccessible to most. The cost and centralised nature of traditional service-delivery approaches in hearing care have undermined equitable access alongside poor awareness.
Summary: Recent innovations in digital and mHealth hearing technologies used by health workers through task shifting are enabling novel community-based services across the continuum of care. This narrative review explores technology-enabled hearing care in communities. We provide examples focused on our work over the past decade to explore more equitable hearing care across primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of prevention.
Key messages: Hearing health innovations have the potential to increase access to care, improve the quality of life for those affected by hearing loss, and reduce global costs associated with untreated hearing loss. More equitable hearing care is a global health priority that requires scalable service-delivery models enabled by innovative technologies within communities and integrated into public health initiatives including hearing health promotion.
{"title":"Advancing Equitable Hearing Care: Innovations in Technology and Service Delivery.","authors":"De Wet Swanepoel","doi":"10.1159/000530671","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530671","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hearing loss is a neglected global health priority affecting 1.5 billion persons. Global access to hearing care is severely limited with management options, like hearing aids, inaccessible to most. The cost and centralised nature of traditional service-delivery approaches in hearing care have undermined equitable access alongside poor awareness.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Recent innovations in digital and mHealth hearing technologies used by health workers through task shifting are enabling novel community-based services across the continuum of care. This narrative review explores technology-enabled hearing care in communities. We provide examples focused on our work over the past decade to explore more equitable hearing care across primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of prevention.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Hearing health innovations have the potential to increase access to care, improve the quality of life for those affected by hearing loss, and reduce global costs associated with untreated hearing loss. More equitable hearing care is a global health priority that requires scalable service-delivery models enabled by innovative technologies within communities and integrated into public health initiatives including hearing health promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":"75 4","pages":"201-207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9947428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Dysphonic voice is present in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP). The aim of this study was to present outcomes following rehabilitation of patients with UVFP, performed according to a voice therapy protocol.
Methods: This prospective study comprised 27 women with UVFP who underwent pre- and post-voice therapy assessment. The mean age of patients was 53.19 ± 10.06 years. The protocol included the following: (1) multidimensional assessment of voice quality before treatment; (2) digital laryngeal manipulation voice therapy; (3) voice therapy evaluation which implied repeated multidimensional assessment of voice.
Results: The results showed improvement in voice quality following voice therapy with regard to the parameters of the objective voice analysis (maximum fundamental frequency of voice, minimum intensity of voice, jitter, shimmer, harmonics-to-noise ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio, p ˂ 0.05), maximum phonation time, subjective analysis of voice, as well as self-assessment of voice quality on all the subscales and overall score (p ˂ 0.001).
Conclusion: Implementing a protocol provides clear guidelines at each stage of the treatment. Voice therapy performed using digital laryngeal manipulation improves the majority of the acoustic and perceptual characteristics of the voice.
{"title":"Voice Improvement after Voice Therapy in Female Patients with Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis after Thyroid Surgery.","authors":"Mila Veselinović, Renata Škrbić, Gordana Mumović, Danijela Dragičević, Dajana Despić, Vesela Milankov","doi":"10.1159/000529573","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529573","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dysphonic voice is present in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP). The aim of this study was to present outcomes following rehabilitation of patients with UVFP, performed according to a voice therapy protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study comprised 27 women with UVFP who underwent pre- and post-voice therapy assessment. The mean age of patients was 53.19 ± 10.06 years. The protocol included the following: (1) multidimensional assessment of voice quality before treatment; (2) digital laryngeal manipulation voice therapy; (3) voice therapy evaluation which implied repeated multidimensional assessment of voice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed improvement in voice quality following voice therapy with regard to the parameters of the objective voice analysis (maximum fundamental frequency of voice, minimum intensity of voice, jitter, shimmer, harmonics-to-noise ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio, p ˂ 0.05), maximum phonation time, subjective analysis of voice, as well as self-assessment of voice quality on all the subscales and overall score (p ˂ 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing a protocol provides clear guidelines at each stage of the treatment. Voice therapy performed using digital laryngeal manipulation improves the majority of the acoustic and perceptual characteristics of the voice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":"75 4","pages":"265-272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9947380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Research reveals the clinical efficacy of both verbal and written stuttering disclosure statements provided by a child who stutters (CWS) and his advocates (i.e., mother or teacher) [Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Jul;51(3):745-60 and Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2021 Aug;52(4):1031-1048]. Although existing data reveal that both the source (i.e., self- vs. advocate disclosure) and modality (i.e., verbal or written) of stuttering disclosure yields significant improvements in the perceptions of speech skills and personality characteristics of CWS, there is a paucity of research directly comparing the modality (verbal vs. written) and source (self, mother, teacher) of disclosure statements. Accordingly, this study analyzes listeners' perceptions of a 12-year-old male CWS' speech skills and personal characteristics, as a function of both the source and modality of factual stuttering disclosure statements [Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Jul;51(3):745-60 and Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2021 Aug;52(4):1031-1048].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 641 college-aged adults participated in this analysis; study participants reported their perceptions of speech skills and personality characteristics of a 12-year-old CWS as a function of stuttering disclosure. Participants were randomly assigned to view one video containing one of two disclosure modalities (verbal or written), one of three stuttering disclosure source conditions (self-disclosure, mother disclosure, and teacher disclosure), or a no-disclosure control condition. Participants in the control group viewed a brief video of a 12-year-old CWS reciting a short reading passage; participants in the experimental groups viewed their assigned disclosure statement followed by the same video used in the control condition. Immediately following the video, all participants completed a survey quantifying their perceptions of the CWSs relative to his speech skills and personal characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results reveal optimal results via verbal self-disclosure and verbal teacher disclosure. A limited number of nominally positive perceptual differences were noted within the written mother disclosure group, while written CWS self-disclosure yielded significantly negative perceptions of the CWS. Overall, verbal disclosures yield far more significant and desirable perceptions of CWS' speech skills and personal characteristics when compared to written stuttering disclosure.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results of this analysis reveal that verbal stuttering disclosure is significantly more effective in improving listeners' perceptions of a CWS, when compared to written stuttering disclosures. Despite the widespread adoption of written communication over digital media (e.g., email and text messages), these data support the notion that face-to-face or video verbal stuttering disclosure provides the most desirable perceptual benefits for CWS. Within ver
{"title":"The Effects of Different Sources and Modalities of Stuttering Disclosure on Listeners' Perceptions of a Child Who Stutters.","authors":"Gregory Snyder, Peyton McKnight Sinak, Ashlee Manahan, Myriam Kornisch, Paul Blanchet","doi":"10.1159/000529499","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529499","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Research reveals the clinical efficacy of both verbal and written stuttering disclosure statements provided by a child who stutters (CWS) and his advocates (i.e., mother or teacher) [Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Jul;51(3):745-60 and Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2021 Aug;52(4):1031-1048]. Although existing data reveal that both the source (i.e., self- vs. advocate disclosure) and modality (i.e., verbal or written) of stuttering disclosure yields significant improvements in the perceptions of speech skills and personality characteristics of CWS, there is a paucity of research directly comparing the modality (verbal vs. written) and source (self, mother, teacher) of disclosure statements. Accordingly, this study analyzes listeners' perceptions of a 12-year-old male CWS' speech skills and personal characteristics, as a function of both the source and modality of factual stuttering disclosure statements [Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Jul;51(3):745-60 and Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2021 Aug;52(4):1031-1048].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 641 college-aged adults participated in this analysis; study participants reported their perceptions of speech skills and personality characteristics of a 12-year-old CWS as a function of stuttering disclosure. Participants were randomly assigned to view one video containing one of two disclosure modalities (verbal or written), one of three stuttering disclosure source conditions (self-disclosure, mother disclosure, and teacher disclosure), or a no-disclosure control condition. Participants in the control group viewed a brief video of a 12-year-old CWS reciting a short reading passage; participants in the experimental groups viewed their assigned disclosure statement followed by the same video used in the control condition. Immediately following the video, all participants completed a survey quantifying their perceptions of the CWSs relative to his speech skills and personal characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results reveal optimal results via verbal self-disclosure and verbal teacher disclosure. A limited number of nominally positive perceptual differences were noted within the written mother disclosure group, while written CWS self-disclosure yielded significantly negative perceptions of the CWS. Overall, verbal disclosures yield far more significant and desirable perceptions of CWS' speech skills and personal characteristics when compared to written stuttering disclosure.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results of this analysis reveal that verbal stuttering disclosure is significantly more effective in improving listeners' perceptions of a CWS, when compared to written stuttering disclosures. Despite the widespread adoption of written communication over digital media (e.g., email and text messages), these data support the notion that face-to-face or video verbal stuttering disclosure provides the most desirable perceptual benefits for CWS. Within ver","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":"75 4","pages":"253-264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9947382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: The fundamental frequency contour (melody) of cry and non-cry utterances becomes more complex with age. However, there is a lack of longitudinal analyses of melody development during the first year of life.
Objective: The aim of the study was to longitudinally analyze melody development in typical vocalization types across the first 12 months of life. The aim was twofold: (1) to answer the question whether melody becomes more complex in all vocalization types with age and (2) to characterize complex patterns in more detail.
Methods: Repeatedly recorded vocalizations (n = 10,988) of 10 healthy infants (6 female) over their first year of life were analyzed using frequency spectrograms and fundamental frequency (f0) analyses (PRAAT). Melody complexity analysis was performed using specific in-lab software (CDAP, pw-project) in a final subset of 9,237 utterances that contained noise-free, undisturbed contours. Generalized mixed linear models were used to analyze age and vocalization type effects on melody complexity.
Results: The vocalization repertoire showed a higher proportion of complex melodies from the second month onward. The age effect was significant, but no difference was found in melody complexity between cry and non-cry vocalizations across the first 6 months. From month 7-12, there was a further significant increase in complex structures only in canonical babbling not in marginal babbling. Melody segmentations by laryngeal constrictions prevailed among complex shapes.
Conclusion: The study demonstrated the regularity of melody development in different vocalization types throughout the first year of life. In terms of prosodic features of infant sounds, melody contour is of primary importance, and further studies are required that also include infants at risk for language development.
{"title":"Fundamental Frequency Contour (Melody) of Infant Vocalizations across the First Year.","authors":"Tabea Kottmann, Maren Wanner, Kathleen Wermke","doi":"10.1159/000528732","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528732","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The fundamental frequency contour (melody) of cry and non-cry utterances becomes more complex with age. However, there is a lack of longitudinal analyses of melody development during the first year of life.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to longitudinally analyze melody development in typical vocalization types across the first 12 months of life. The aim was twofold: (1) to answer the question whether melody becomes more complex in all vocalization types with age and (2) to characterize complex patterns in more detail.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Repeatedly recorded vocalizations (n = 10,988) of 10 healthy infants (6 female) over their first year of life were analyzed using frequency spectrograms and fundamental frequency (f0) analyses (PRAAT). Melody complexity analysis was performed using specific in-lab software (CDAP, pw-project) in a final subset of 9,237 utterances that contained noise-free, undisturbed contours. Generalized mixed linear models were used to analyze age and vocalization type effects on melody complexity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vocalization repertoire showed a higher proportion of complex melodies from the second month onward. The age effect was significant, but no difference was found in melody complexity between cry and non-cry vocalizations across the first 6 months. From month 7-12, there was a further significant increase in complex structures only in canonical babbling not in marginal babbling. Melody segmentations by laryngeal constrictions prevailed among complex shapes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated the regularity of melody development in different vocalization types throughout the first year of life. In terms of prosodic features of infant sounds, melody contour is of primary importance, and further studies are required that also include infants at risk for language development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":"75 3","pages":"177-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273904/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10073689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: The Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool (PediEAT) is a parent-report tool to assess feeding problems in children aged 6 months to 7 years. This study aimed to translate and adapt the PediEAT to Persian and determine its psychometric properties.
Methods: The PediEAT was translated and culturally adapted the following guidelines for health-related instruments. Face and content validity was assessed using an expert panel. This study also aimed to evaluate psychometric properties using a sample of 160 children without feeding problems and 43 children with diagnosed feeding problems. Known-groups validation was used to compare PediEAT scores between children with and without feeding problems. In criterion validity, pediatricians' opinions were used as a criterion. To calculate internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha was used. After 2 weeks, temporal stability was assessed with 40 parents who repeated the PediEAT.
Results: Face and content validity showed that all tool items had CVI and kappa coefficients higher than 0.8. Known-group validity showed that the total and subscale scores significantly differed between children with and without feeding problems (p < 0.001). Criterion validity showed that criterion measurements correlated with questionnaire measurements. All four subscales and the total scale showed acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha > 0.74). Test-retest reliability was acceptable (ICC = 0.987, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The PediEAT-Persian version is a valid and reliable tool for assessing symptoms of problematic feeding in Persian children aged 6 months to 7 years.
{"title":"Translation, Cultural Adaption, and Validation of the Persian Version of the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool.","authors":"Seyede Fatemeh Alavi, Zahra Sadat Ghoreishi, Nasibeh Zanjari, Britt Frisk Pados, Roya Choopani","doi":"10.1159/000527226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527226","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool (PediEAT) is a parent-report tool to assess feeding problems in children aged 6 months to 7 years. This study aimed to translate and adapt the PediEAT to Persian and determine its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PediEAT was translated and culturally adapted the following guidelines for health-related instruments. Face and content validity was assessed using an expert panel. This study also aimed to evaluate psychometric properties using a sample of 160 children without feeding problems and 43 children with diagnosed feeding problems. Known-groups validation was used to compare PediEAT scores between children with and without feeding problems. In criterion validity, pediatricians' opinions were used as a criterion. To calculate internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha was used. After 2 weeks, temporal stability was assessed with 40 parents who repeated the PediEAT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Face and content validity showed that all tool items had CVI and kappa coefficients higher than 0.8. Known-group validity showed that the total and subscale scores significantly differed between children with and without feeding problems (p < 0.001). Criterion validity showed that criterion measurements correlated with questionnaire measurements. All four subscales and the total scale showed acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha > 0.74). Test-retest reliability was acceptable (ICC = 0.987, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PediEAT-Persian version is a valid and reliable tool for assessing symptoms of problematic feeding in Persian children aged 6 months to 7 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":"75 3","pages":"140-148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10127373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Selma Saad Merouwe, Raymond Bertram, Sami Richa, Kurt Eggers
Introduction: Recent studies conducted with bilingual populations have shown that bilingual children who do not stutter (CWNS) are often less fluent than their monolingual counterparts, which seems to affect the accuracy with which speech-language pathologists (SLPs) identify stuttering in bilinguals. That is, misdiagnosis appears frequently in bilingual children and is more likely to occur with bilingual CWNS (false positives) than with bilingual CWS (false negatives).
Methods: The goal of the current study was to gain insight in the extent of this misdiagnosis. Speech samples of 6 Lebanese bilingual CWNS and 2 CWS were rated by Lebanese SLPs in an audio-only and audiovisual presentation mode. SLPs had to identify each child as stuttering or not and subsequently rate on a 6-point scale the stuttering severity for each child. SLPs also provided background information by means of a questionnaire.
Results: The results showed that stuttering severity ratings (1) were on average significantly higher for CWS than for CWNS, (2) were for each CWS higher than for all but one of the CWNS, (3) varied significantly among the CWNS but not the CWS, (4) were not affected by the presentation mode, and (5) correlated positively with the percentage of stuttering-like disfluencies (SLD) and the mean number of iterations, but not with the percentage of other disfluencies (OD).
Conclusion: Misdiagnosed bilingual CWNS are perceived by the SLPs as having a mild stutter, primarily based on the frequency of their disfluencies, but can be occasionally rated at par with CWS. Further research differentiating the disfluent speech of bilingual children who do and do not stutter is needed to reach a more adequate diagnosis of stuttering.
{"title":"Stuttering Severity Judgments by Speech-Language Pathologists of Bilingual Children Who Do and Do Not Stutter.","authors":"Selma Saad Merouwe, Raymond Bertram, Sami Richa, Kurt Eggers","doi":"10.1159/000528520","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528520","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent studies conducted with bilingual populations have shown that bilingual children who do not stutter (CWNS) are often less fluent than their monolingual counterparts, which seems to affect the accuracy with which speech-language pathologists (SLPs) identify stuttering in bilinguals. That is, misdiagnosis appears frequently in bilingual children and is more likely to occur with bilingual CWNS (false positives) than with bilingual CWS (false negatives).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The goal of the current study was to gain insight in the extent of this misdiagnosis. Speech samples of 6 Lebanese bilingual CWNS and 2 CWS were rated by Lebanese SLPs in an audio-only and audiovisual presentation mode. SLPs had to identify each child as stuttering or not and subsequently rate on a 6-point scale the stuttering severity for each child. SLPs also provided background information by means of a questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that stuttering severity ratings (1) were on average significantly higher for CWS than for CWNS, (2) were for each CWS higher than for all but one of the CWNS, (3) varied significantly among the CWNS but not the CWS, (4) were not affected by the presentation mode, and (5) correlated positively with the percentage of stuttering-like disfluencies (SLD) and the mean number of iterations, but not with the percentage of other disfluencies (OD).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Misdiagnosed bilingual CWNS are perceived by the SLPs as having a mild stutter, primarily based on the frequency of their disfluencies, but can be occasionally rated at par with CWS. Further research differentiating the disfluent speech of bilingual children who do and do not stutter is needed to reach a more adequate diagnosis of stuttering.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":"75 3","pages":"164-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9632928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2022-06-27DOI: 10.1159/000525514
Kristin J Teplansky, Alan Wisler, Jordan R Green, Thomas Campbell, Daragh Heitzman, Sara G Austin, Jun Wang
Purpose: The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of acceleration-based articulatory measures in characterizing the decline in speech motor control due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
Method: Electromagnetic articulography was used to record tongue and lip movements during the production of 20 phrases. Data were collected from 50 individuals diagnosed with ALS. Articulatory kinematic variability was measured using the spatiotemporal index of both instantaneous acceleration and speed signals. Linear regression models were used to analyze the relationship between variability measures and intelligible speaking rate (a clinical measure of disease progression). A machine learning algorithm (support vector regression, SVR) was used to assess whether acceleration or speed features (e.g., mean, median, maximum) showed better performance at predicting speech severity in patients with ALS.
Results: As intelligible speaking rate declined, the variability of acceleration of tongue and lip movement patterns significantly increased (p < 0.001). The variability of speed and vertical displacement did not significantly predict speech performance measures. Additionally, based on R2 and root mean square error (RMSE) values, the SVR model was able to predict speech severity more accurately from acceleration features (R2 = 0.601, RMSE = 38.453) and displacement features (R2 = 0.218, RMSE = 52.700) than from speed features (R2 = 0.554, RMSE = 40.772).
Conclusion: Results from these models highlight differences in speech motor control in participants with ALS. The variability in acceleration of tongue and lip movements increases as speech performance declines, potentially reflecting physiological deviations due to the progression of ALS. Our findings suggest that acceleration is a more sensitive indicator of speech deterioration due to ALS than displacement and speed and may contribute to improved algorithm designs for monitoring disease progression from speech signals.
目的:本研究旨在探讨基于加速度的发音测量方法在描述肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症(ALS)导致的言语运动控制能力下降方面的效果:方法:使用电磁发音法记录 20 个短语发音过程中舌头和嘴唇的运动。数据收集自 50 名确诊为 ALS 的患者。使用瞬时加速度和速度信号的时空指数测量发音运动变异性。线性回归模型用于分析变异性测量与可理解说话率(疾病进展的临床测量指标)之间的关系。使用机器学习算法(支持向量回归,SVR)来评估加速度或速度特征(如平均值、中位数、最大值)在预测 ALS 患者言语严重程度方面是否表现更佳:随着可理解说话率的下降,舌头和嘴唇运动模式的加速度变异性显著增加(p < 0.001)。速度和垂直位移的变异性对语言表达能力的预测并不明显。此外,根据 R2 和均方根误差 (RMSE) 值,SVR 模型能够根据加速度特征(R2 = 0.601,RMSE = 38.453)和位移特征(R2 = 0.218,RMSE = 52.700)比根据速度特征(R2 = 0.554,RMSE = 40.772)更准确地预测语音严重程度:这些模型的结果突显了 ALS 患者在言语运动控制方面的差异。随着语言能力的下降,舌头和嘴唇运动加速度的变异性也在增加,这可能反映了 ALS 进展过程中的生理偏差。我们的研究结果表明,与位移和速度相比,加速度是反映 ALS 引起的言语退化的一个更灵敏的指标,可能有助于改进通过言语信号监测疾病进展的算法设计。
{"title":"Tongue and Lip Acceleration as a Measure of Speech Decline in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.","authors":"Kristin J Teplansky, Alan Wisler, Jordan R Green, Thomas Campbell, Daragh Heitzman, Sara G Austin, Jun Wang","doi":"10.1159/000525514","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000525514","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of acceleration-based articulatory measures in characterizing the decline in speech motor control due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Electromagnetic articulography was used to record tongue and lip movements during the production of 20 phrases. Data were collected from 50 individuals diagnosed with ALS. Articulatory kinematic variability was measured using the spatiotemporal index of both instantaneous acceleration and speed signals. Linear regression models were used to analyze the relationship between variability measures and intelligible speaking rate (a clinical measure of disease progression). A machine learning algorithm (support vector regression, SVR) was used to assess whether acceleration or speed features (e.g., mean, median, maximum) showed better performance at predicting speech severity in patients with ALS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As intelligible speaking rate declined, the variability of acceleration of tongue and lip movement patterns significantly increased (p < 0.001). The variability of speed and vertical displacement did not significantly predict speech performance measures. Additionally, based on R2 and root mean square error (RMSE) values, the SVR model was able to predict speech severity more accurately from acceleration features (R2 = 0.601, RMSE = 38.453) and displacement features (R2 = 0.218, RMSE = 52.700) than from speed features (R2 = 0.554, RMSE = 40.772).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results from these models highlight differences in speech motor control in participants with ALS. The variability in acceleration of tongue and lip movements increases as speech performance declines, potentially reflecting physiological deviations due to the progression of ALS. Our findings suggest that acceleration is a more sensitive indicator of speech deterioration due to ALS than displacement and speed and may contribute to improved algorithm designs for monitoring disease progression from speech signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":"75 1","pages":"23-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792632/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10717429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Dysphagia as a consequence of multiple sclerosis (MS) puts individuals at higher risk of dehydration, malnutrition, and aspiration pneumonia. This study intended to investigate the effects of a combined program of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and conventional swallowing therapy to improve swallow safety and efficiency, oral intake, and physical, emotional, and functional impacts of dysphagia in people with dysphagia and MS. Methods: In this single-case experimental study with ABA design, two participants with dysphagia caused by MS underwent 12 sessions therapy during 6 weeks following a baseline of 4 evaluation sessions. They were evaluated 4 more times in the follow-up phase after therapy sessions. Scores of Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA), DYsphagia in MUltiple Sclerosis (DYMUS), and timed test of swallowing capacity were obtained at baseline, during treatment, and in the follow-up phases. The Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) based on videofluoroscopic swallow studies, Persian-Dysphagia Handicap Index (Persian-DHI), and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) were also completed before and after treatment. Visual analysis and percentage of nonoverlapping data were calculated. Results: MASA, DYMUS, FOIS, and DHI scores indicated significant improvement in both participants. Although the scores of the timed test of swallowing capacity in participant 1 (B.N.) and DOSS in participant 2 (M.A.) showed no changes, considerable improvements including reducing the amount of residue and the number of swallows required to clear bolus were seen in the posttreatment videofluoroscopic records of both participants. Conclusion: NMES in conjunction with conventional dysphagia therapy based on motor learning principles could improve the swallowing function and decrease disabling effects of dysphagia on different aspects of life in participants with dysphagia caused by MS.
{"title":"Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Conjunction with Conventional Swallowing Therapy in the Treatment of Dysphagia Caused by Multiple Sclerosis: A Single-Case Experimental Design.","authors":"Shadi Tavakoli, Marziyeh Poorjavad, Navid Taheri, Leila Ghasisin, Masoud Etemadifar, Asefeh Memarian","doi":"10.1159/000531062","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000531062","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Dysphagia as a consequence of multiple sclerosis (MS) puts individuals at higher risk of dehydration, malnutrition, and aspiration pneumonia. This study intended to investigate the effects of a combined program of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and conventional swallowing therapy to improve swallow safety and efficiency, oral intake, and physical, emotional, and functional impacts of dysphagia in people with dysphagia and MS. Methods: In this single-case experimental study with ABA design, two participants with dysphagia caused by MS underwent 12 sessions therapy during 6 weeks following a baseline of 4 evaluation sessions. They were evaluated 4 more times in the follow-up phase after therapy sessions. Scores of Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA), DYsphagia in MUltiple Sclerosis (DYMUS), and timed test of swallowing capacity were obtained at baseline, during treatment, and in the follow-up phases. The Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) based on videofluoroscopic swallow studies, Persian-Dysphagia Handicap Index (Persian-DHI), and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) were also completed before and after treatment. Visual analysis and percentage of nonoverlapping data were calculated. Results: MASA, DYMUS, FOIS, and DHI scores indicated significant improvement in both participants. Although the scores of the timed test of swallowing capacity in participant 1 (B.N.) and DOSS in participant 2 (M.A.) showed no changes, considerable improvements including reducing the amount of residue and the number of swallows required to clear bolus were seen in the posttreatment videofluoroscopic records of both participants. Conclusion: NMES in conjunction with conventional dysphagia therapy based on motor learning principles could improve the swallowing function and decrease disabling effects of dysphagia on different aspects of life in participants with dysphagia caused by MS.","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":" ","pages":"350-362"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9876675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2023-08-02DOI: 10.1159/000533292
İlknur Maviş, Esra Yaşar-Gündüz
Introduction: Studies on personal narratives are rare in Turkey and there is no standard protocol for eliciting them. The aim of this small-scale study was to translate the Global TALES Protocol into Turkish, with cultural adaptations, and to present the results regarding its usability for two different age-groups of 7- and 10-year-old school children. We investigated narrative skills in terms of verbal productivity (number of utterances, total number of words), syntactic complexity (mean length of utterance), and semantic diversity (number of different words). In addition, group comparisons were made in terms of the participants' gender and age.
Methods: A total of 20 children, 10 from each age-group (7;0-7;11 and 10;0-10;11) participated in the study. All children were monolingual Turkish-speaking children with typical development. Participants were recruited through personal and/or social networks. All personal narratives were gathered via online connections (Zoom).
Results: Descriptive statistics were used to describe the children's performance, and the analysis of group differences was made separately according to age and gender. All children produced narratives in response to the six protocol prompts. In addition, the number of children who did not require the scripted follow-up prompts was higher than those needing a scripted follow-up prompt to produce a response. No statistically significant group differences were found in terms of gender and age on any of the measurements.
Conclusion: The results from this small-scale investigation showed that the translated version of the Global TALES Protocol was effective in eliciting personal narratives from Turkish-speaking children. We concluded that there is no need to change the directions or give additional guidance or prompts to the children. Future studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these findings.
{"title":"Evaluating the Personal Narrative Skills of Monolingual Turkish-Speaking 7- and 10-Year-Old Children with Typical Development through Global TALES: A Pilot Study.","authors":"İlknur Maviş, Esra Yaşar-Gündüz","doi":"10.1159/000533292","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000533292","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies on personal narratives are rare in Turkey and there is no standard protocol for eliciting them. The aim of this small-scale study was to translate the Global TALES Protocol into Turkish, with cultural adaptations, and to present the results regarding its usability for two different age-groups of 7- and 10-year-old school children. We investigated narrative skills in terms of verbal productivity (number of utterances, total number of words), syntactic complexity (mean length of utterance), and semantic diversity (number of different words). In addition, group comparisons were made in terms of the participants' gender and age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20 children, 10 from each age-group (7;0-7;11 and 10;0-10;11) participated in the study. All children were monolingual Turkish-speaking children with typical development. Participants were recruited through personal and/or social networks. All personal narratives were gathered via online connections (Zoom).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive statistics were used to describe the children's performance, and the analysis of group differences was made separately according to age and gender. All children produced narratives in response to the six protocol prompts. In addition, the number of children who did not require the scripted follow-up prompts was higher than those needing a scripted follow-up prompt to produce a response. No statistically significant group differences were found in terms of gender and age on any of the measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results from this small-scale investigation showed that the translated version of the Global TALES Protocol was effective in eliciting personal narratives from Turkish-speaking children. We concluded that there is no need to change the directions or give additional guidance or prompts to the children. Future studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":" ","pages":"382-392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10283718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}