Pub Date : 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-04191-5
Nervine ElMeshad, Alice Di Domenico, Samantha R de Silva
{"title":"Choroidal abnormalities in neurofibromatosis type 1.","authors":"Nervine ElMeshad, Alice Di Domenico, Samantha R de Silva","doi":"10.1038/s41433-025-04191-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-04191-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145916961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-04197-z
Vickie Lee, Mario Salvi, Anja Eckstein, Colin Dayan, Karim Meeran
{"title":"Horizon scanning from panel discussions at the EUGOGO Global TED Forum 2025 London.","authors":"Vickie Lee, Mario Salvi, Anja Eckstein, Colin Dayan, Karim Meeran","doi":"10.1038/s41433-025-04197-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-04197-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145916955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-04207-0
Alexander Geoffrey Swystun, David Burton, Alison Edwards, Pouya Alaghband
Background: Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) is a commonly performed procedure resulting in a reduction in the risk of progression to Acute Angle Closure and subsequent glaucoma. Whilst demand for LPI has varied over the previous 25 years, non-medical clinicians have been increasingly utilised in the delivery of ophthalmic laser procedures. There is, however, a paucity of safety and effectiveness of optometrist-performed LPI.
Method: This was a retrospective study. The success rate was determined by the presence of a patent LPI at the first appointment post-procedure. Adverse events were captured from electronic patient letters from the procedure until the first appointment post-procedure.
Results: Two optometrists performed LPI on 105 eyes. Presence of a patent iridotomy was documented in 93% and 89% for optometrist one and two, respectively (n = 95). Transient adverse events were reported in four patients. The remaining 10 eyes underwent a redo LPI.
Conclusion: Optometrists delivered a safe and effective LPI service with low rate of adverse events and high success rates.
{"title":"The safety and effectiveness of optometrist delivered laser peripheral iridotomy.","authors":"Alexander Geoffrey Swystun, David Burton, Alison Edwards, Pouya Alaghband","doi":"10.1038/s41433-025-04207-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-04207-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) is a commonly performed procedure resulting in a reduction in the risk of progression to Acute Angle Closure and subsequent glaucoma. Whilst demand for LPI has varied over the previous 25 years, non-medical clinicians have been increasingly utilised in the delivery of ophthalmic laser procedures. There is, however, a paucity of safety and effectiveness of optometrist-performed LPI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a retrospective study. The success rate was determined by the presence of a patent LPI at the first appointment post-procedure. Adverse events were captured from electronic patient letters from the procedure until the first appointment post-procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two optometrists performed LPI on 105 eyes. Presence of a patent iridotomy was documented in 93% and 89% for optometrist one and two, respectively (n = 95). Transient adverse events were reported in four patients. The remaining 10 eyes underwent a redo LPI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optometrists delivered a safe and effective LPI service with low rate of adverse events and high success rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-04214-1
Mahad Chaudhry, Chance Bratten, Eli Paul, Eli Oldham, Ahmed Elghzali, Annes Elfar, Matt Vassar
Background: There is a growing burden that highlights the need for ophthalmology research to improve treatment outcomes and patient care. By promoting transparency, reproducibility, and collaboration, Data Sharing Statements (DSS) provide a formal declaration of whether and how data can be accessed, reused, or shared, ensuring that research findings can be validated. This study examines the prevalence, content, and implementation of DSS in ophthalmology journals from 2018 to 2023.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed) was conducted to evaluate clinical studies published in ten leading ophthalmology journals between January 1, 2018, and December 14, 2023. Data extraction was conducted via a standardized form in a masked, duplicate fashion. A hierarchical logistic regression was used to assess factors with potential influence on DSS inclusion. A qualitative analysis was performed to identify common themes in DSS.
Results: Of the 1385 articles analyzed, 326 (23.54%) included a DSS, with notable variability in DSS inclusion between journals. The British Journal of Ophthalmology had the highest DSS rate (152/228, 66.67%), while Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science had the lowest (4/103, 3.88%). Clinical trials were the most observed study design; however, DSS rates were low (183/667; 27%). Factors including study design, impact factor, funding type, and article access did not significantly influence DSS inclusion. The most common DSS themes were Conditional Data Availability (199/302, 65.89%) and Gatekeeper Role (87/302, 28.81%).
Conclusion: Implementing stronger mandates and adopting standardized data-sharing policies could address barriers to data-sharing practices, improving transparency and reproducibility in ophthalmology research.
背景:有一个日益增长的负担,强调需要眼科研究,以改善治疗结果和病人护理。通过提高透明度、可重复性和协作性,数据共享声明(DSS)提供了数据是否以及如何被访问、重用或共享的正式声明,确保研究结果可以得到验证。本研究调查了2018 - 2023年眼科期刊中DSS的流行、内容和实施情况。方法:在MEDLINE (PubMed)上进行综合文献检索,对2018年1月1日至2023年12月14日期间发表在10种主要眼科期刊上的临床研究进行评估。数据提取是通过一个标准化的表格以一种隐蔽的、重复的方式进行的。采用层次逻辑回归评估可能影响DSS纳入的因素。进行定性分析以确定DSS的共同主题。结果:在1385篇分析的文献中,326篇(23.54%)纳入了DSS,不同期刊间纳入DSS的差异显著。《英国眼科杂志》(British Journal of ophthalology)的DSS率最高(152/228,66.67%),《眼科调查与视觉科学》(Investigative ophthalology and Visual Science)最低(4/103,3.88%)。临床试验是观察最多的研究设计;但DSS发生率较低(183/667;27%)。包括研究设计、影响因子、资助类型和文章获取在内的因素对DSS纳入没有显著影响。最常见的DSS主题是条件数据可用性(199/302,65.89%)和看门人角色(87/302,28.81%)。结论:实施更强有力的授权和采用标准化的数据共享政策可以解决数据共享实践的障碍,提高眼科研究的透明度和可重复性。
{"title":"Evaluating the prevalence and application of data sharing statements in high-impact ophthalmology journals.","authors":"Mahad Chaudhry, Chance Bratten, Eli Paul, Eli Oldham, Ahmed Elghzali, Annes Elfar, Matt Vassar","doi":"10.1038/s41433-025-04214-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-04214-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a growing burden that highlights the need for ophthalmology research to improve treatment outcomes and patient care. By promoting transparency, reproducibility, and collaboration, Data Sharing Statements (DSS) provide a formal declaration of whether and how data can be accessed, reused, or shared, ensuring that research findings can be validated. This study examines the prevalence, content, and implementation of DSS in ophthalmology journals from 2018 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed) was conducted to evaluate clinical studies published in ten leading ophthalmology journals between January 1, 2018, and December 14, 2023. Data extraction was conducted via a standardized form in a masked, duplicate fashion. A hierarchical logistic regression was used to assess factors with potential influence on DSS inclusion. A qualitative analysis was performed to identify common themes in DSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1385 articles analyzed, 326 (23.54%) included a DSS, with notable variability in DSS inclusion between journals. The British Journal of Ophthalmology had the highest DSS rate (152/228, 66.67%), while Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science had the lowest (4/103, 3.88%). Clinical trials were the most observed study design; however, DSS rates were low (183/667; 27%). Factors including study design, impact factor, funding type, and article access did not significantly influence DSS inclusion. The most common DSS themes were Conditional Data Availability (199/302, 65.89%) and Gatekeeper Role (87/302, 28.81%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing stronger mandates and adopting standardized data-sharing policies could address barriers to data-sharing practices, improving transparency and reproducibility in ophthalmology research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-04135-z
Diya Baker, Abdulmalik Alsaif, Mohammad Karam, Sam Gurney, Joseph Abbott
Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the peer-reviewed literature describing the efficacy of the Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) in managing intraocular pressure (IOP) and its outcomes.
Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted across major databases to identify relevant studies. The analysis focused on glaucoma patients who underwent PGI. The primary outcomes included failure rate, success rates (complete and qualified), reduction in IOP and post-operative complications. Reduction in medication use was assessed as secondary outcome. A random-effects model was applied for the meta-analysis, and pooled estimates were calculated using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software.
Results: Out of the 255 articles screened, six studies met the eligibility criteria with a total sample of 267 eyes. In glaucoma patients receiving the PGI, complete (56.4%) and qualified success rates were 56.4 and 80.3% respectively. The mean reduction in IOP was 13.62 mmHg, demonstrating a significant difference vs baseline (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in medications by 2.80 (p < 0.0001).The average rate of hypotony (all definitions) was 5.12%.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the efficacy of PGI in controlling intraocular pressure and achieving good outcomes for glaucoma patients.
{"title":"Paul tube implant: a meta-analysis and systematic review evaluating clinical outcomes.","authors":"Diya Baker, Abdulmalik Alsaif, Mohammad Karam, Sam Gurney, Joseph Abbott","doi":"10.1038/s41433-025-04135-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-04135-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the peer-reviewed literature describing the efficacy of the Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) in managing intraocular pressure (IOP) and its outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comprehensive searches were conducted across major databases to identify relevant studies. The analysis focused on glaucoma patients who underwent PGI. The primary outcomes included failure rate, success rates (complete and qualified), reduction in IOP and post-operative complications. Reduction in medication use was assessed as secondary outcome. A random-effects model was applied for the meta-analysis, and pooled estimates were calculated using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 255 articles screened, six studies met the eligibility criteria with a total sample of 267 eyes. In glaucoma patients receiving the PGI, complete (56.4%) and qualified success rates were 56.4 and 80.3% respectively. The mean reduction in IOP was 13.62 mmHg, demonstrating a significant difference vs baseline (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in medications by 2.80 (p < 0.0001).The average rate of hypotony (all definitions) was 5.12%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the efficacy of PGI in controlling intraocular pressure and achieving good outcomes for glaucoma patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-05DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-04196-0
Graham A Lee, Shenouda Girgis
The Hydrus Microstent (HM) and iStent inject W are two widely used trans-trabecular bypass devices and can be combined with phacoemulsification for glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery.
Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of the HM with triple iStent inject W devices (TiSW) devices combined with phacoemulsification in a real-world setting over 3 years of follow-up.
Methods: A prospective, consecutive, quasi-experimental, longitudinal study was conducted on open-angle glaucoma patients at a subspecialty cataract and glaucoma private practice in Brisbane, Australia. Outcomes included yearly changes from preoperative values in mean IOP and mean number of glaucoma medications; proportional shifts across IOP and number of glaucoma medication categories at preoperative and yearly time points, and hazard ratio for time to failure based on the American Academy of Ophthalmology combined minimally invasive glaucoma surgery criteria. Multi-level mixed effects regression modelling with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to estimate the treatment effect while accounting for repeated measurements, clustering, confounding, and imbalances in baseline covariates.
Results: Of the 105 cases, 56 (53.3%) phacoemulsification cases were combined with the HM and 49 (46.7%) were combined with the TiSW. At 3 years, the mean IOP reduction in the HM was 2.6 mmHg (from 15.1 to 12.5 mmHg), while the TiSW showed a reduction of 2.0 mmHg (from 15.2 to 13.2 mmHg). No significant between-group differences in estimated changes in mean IOP from preoperative values were found at years 1, 2, and 3 (all Holm adjusted p = 1.00). Significant reductions in the estimated mean number of medications were observed in both groups at 3 years. The changes in mean number of medications from preoperative values at yearly timepoints were not statistically significant between groups (all Holm adjusted p = 1.00). The 3-year reduction was 1.3 medications in the HM (from a total of 2.3 to 1.0) and 1.4 medications in the TiSW (from a total of 2.2 to 0.8), resulting in a difference of 0.1 (95% CI: -0.6, 0.8). The proportions of eyes that were medication-free at 3 years were 54.3% in the HM group and 61.2% in the TiSW group. The intraoperative safety of the HM and TiSW was good, with no significant complications.
Conclusion: This study has shown that both HM and TiSW provide effective IOP reduction and medication reduction in glaucoma patients undergoing combined cataract surgery at up to 3 years follow-up. Both devices were well-tolerated. Surgeon preference may guide device selection, with specific considerations for patients such as extremes of ocular size or anticoagulation therapy.
{"title":"Hydrus microstent versus triple iStent inject W combined with phacoemulsification for glaucoma management: three-year outcomes.","authors":"Graham A Lee, Shenouda Girgis","doi":"10.1038/s41433-025-04196-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-04196-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Hydrus Microstent (HM) and iStent inject W are two widely used trans-trabecular bypass devices and can be combined with phacoemulsification for glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of the HM with triple iStent inject W devices (TiSW) devices combined with phacoemulsification in a real-world setting over 3 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, consecutive, quasi-experimental, longitudinal study was conducted on open-angle glaucoma patients at a subspecialty cataract and glaucoma private practice in Brisbane, Australia. Outcomes included yearly changes from preoperative values in mean IOP and mean number of glaucoma medications; proportional shifts across IOP and number of glaucoma medication categories at preoperative and yearly time points, and hazard ratio for time to failure based on the American Academy of Ophthalmology combined minimally invasive glaucoma surgery criteria. Multi-level mixed effects regression modelling with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to estimate the treatment effect while accounting for repeated measurements, clustering, confounding, and imbalances in baseline covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 105 cases, 56 (53.3%) phacoemulsification cases were combined with the HM and 49 (46.7%) were combined with the TiSW. At 3 years, the mean IOP reduction in the HM was 2.6 mmHg (from 15.1 to 12.5 mmHg), while the TiSW showed a reduction of 2.0 mmHg (from 15.2 to 13.2 mmHg). No significant between-group differences in estimated changes in mean IOP from preoperative values were found at years 1, 2, and 3 (all Holm adjusted p = 1.00). Significant reductions in the estimated mean number of medications were observed in both groups at 3 years. The changes in mean number of medications from preoperative values at yearly timepoints were not statistically significant between groups (all Holm adjusted p = 1.00). The 3-year reduction was 1.3 medications in the HM (from a total of 2.3 to 1.0) and 1.4 medications in the TiSW (from a total of 2.2 to 0.8), resulting in a difference of 0.1 (95% CI: -0.6, 0.8). The proportions of eyes that were medication-free at 3 years were 54.3% in the HM group and 61.2% in the TiSW group. The intraoperative safety of the HM and TiSW was good, with no significant complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has shown that both HM and TiSW provide effective IOP reduction and medication reduction in glaucoma patients undergoing combined cataract surgery at up to 3 years follow-up. Both devices were well-tolerated. Surgeon preference may guide device selection, with specific considerations for patients such as extremes of ocular size or anticoagulation therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-04DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-04229-8
Hadi Vahedi, Ali Jafarizadeh
{"title":"Botulinum toxin a for dry eye disease: impact of population mixing and statistical issues.","authors":"Hadi Vahedi, Ali Jafarizadeh","doi":"10.1038/s41433-025-04229-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-04229-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145896358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}