Pub Date : 2025-01-10DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1806
M Destoop, P Mohr, F Butlen, P Kéri, J Samochowiec, L De Picker, A Fiorillo, K P C Kuypers, G Dom
Background: Recent years show an exponential increased interest ("renaissance") in the use of psychedelics for the treatment of mental disorders and broader. Some of these treatments, such as psilocybin for depression, are in the process of formal regulation by regulatory bodies in the US (FDA) and Europe (EMA), and as such on the brink of real-world implementation. In the slipstream of these developments increasing commercial initiatives are taking shape. The European Psychiatric Association (EPA) acknowledges both the therapeutic potential of psychedelic substances and the challenges for both research and clinical implementation. Steps need to be taken toward a well-balanced policy based upon sound scientific evidence and research, aiming at safe, ethical responsible integration of psychedelic therapy available for all patients who can potentially benefit.
Methods: In this EPA policy paper, we highlight the potential benefits, and also the challenges of psychedelic treatments, which can be relevant for the future real-world implementation of these treatments.
Results: In addition to an overview of the current evidence and hypotheses of working mechanisms of psychedelic treatment, this policy paper specifically highlights the importance of the psychosocial components of the treatment as well as the ethical and professional aspects playing a role in real-world implementation.
Conclusions: Four recommendations are formulated for further research and clinical implementation.
{"title":"Use of psychedelic treatments in psychiatric clinical practice: an EPA policy paper.","authors":"M Destoop, P Mohr, F Butlen, P Kéri, J Samochowiec, L De Picker, A Fiorillo, K P C Kuypers, G Dom","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1806","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1806","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent years show an exponential increased interest (\"renaissance\") in the use of psychedelics for the treatment of mental disorders and broader. Some of these treatments, such as psilocybin for depression, are in the process of formal regulation by regulatory bodies in the US (FDA) and Europe (EMA), and as such on the brink of real-world implementation. In the slipstream of these developments increasing commercial initiatives are taking shape. The European Psychiatric Association (EPA) acknowledges both the therapeutic potential of psychedelic substances and the challenges for both research and clinical implementation. Steps need to be taken toward a well-balanced policy based upon sound scientific evidence and research, aiming at safe, ethical responsible integration of psychedelic therapy available for all patients who can potentially benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this EPA policy paper, we highlight the potential benefits, and also the challenges of psychedelic treatments, which can be relevant for the future real-world implementation of these treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In addition to an overview of the current evidence and hypotheses of working mechanisms of psychedelic treatment, this policy paper specifically highlights the importance of the psychosocial components of the treatment as well as the ethical and professional aspects playing a role in real-world implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Four recommendations are formulated for further research and clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":"68 1","pages":"e3"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795445/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142946871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-10DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1800
Noah L Joore, Marte Z van der Horst, Eric O Noorthoorn, Jurriaan F M Strous, Fleur J Vruwink, Sinan Guloksuz, Peter C Siegmund, Jurjen J Luykx
Background: Temperature increases in the context of climate change affect numerous mental health outcomes. One such relevant outcome is involuntary admissions as these often relate to severe (life)threatening psychiatric conditions. Due to a shortage of studies into this topic, relationships between mean ambient temperature and involuntary admissions have remained largely elusive.
Aims: To examine associations between involuntary admissions to psychiatric institutions and various meteorological variables.
Methods: Involuntary admissions data from 23 psychiatric institutions in the Netherlands were linked to meteorological data from their respective weather stations. Generalized additive models were used, integrating a restricted maximum likelihood method and thin plate regression splines to preserve generalizability and minimize the risk of overfitting. We thus conducted univariable, seasonally stratified, multivariable, and lagged analyses.
Results: A total of 13,746 involuntary admissions were included over 21,549 days. In univariable and multivariable models, we found significant positive associations with involuntary admissions for ambient temperature and windspeed, with projected increases of up to 0.94% in involuntary admissions per degree Celsius temperature elevation. In the univariable analyses using all data, the strongest associations in terms of significance and explained variance were found for mean ambient temperature (p = 2.5 × 10-6, Variance Explained [r2] = 0.096%) and maximum ambient temperature (p = 8.65 × 10-4, r2 = 0.072%). We did not find evidence that the lagged associations explain the associations for ambient temperature better than the direct associations.
Conclusion: Mean ambient temperature is consistently but weakly associated with involuntary psychiatric admissions. Our findings set the stage for further epidemiological and mechanistic studies into this topic, as well as for modeling studies examining future involuntary psychiatric admissions.
{"title":"Positive associations between mean ambient temperature and involuntary admissions to psychiatric facilities.","authors":"Noah L Joore, Marte Z van der Horst, Eric O Noorthoorn, Jurriaan F M Strous, Fleur J Vruwink, Sinan Guloksuz, Peter C Siegmund, Jurjen J Luykx","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1800","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1800","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Temperature increases in the context of climate change affect numerous mental health outcomes. One such relevant outcome is involuntary admissions as these often relate to severe (life)threatening psychiatric conditions. Due to a shortage of studies into this topic, relationships between mean ambient temperature and involuntary admissions have remained largely elusive.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine associations between involuntary admissions to psychiatric institutions and various meteorological variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Involuntary admissions data from 23 psychiatric institutions in the Netherlands were linked to meteorological data from their respective weather stations. Generalized additive models were used, integrating a restricted maximum likelihood method and thin plate regression splines to preserve generalizability and minimize the risk of overfitting. We thus conducted univariable, seasonally stratified, multivariable, and lagged analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13,746 involuntary admissions were included over 21,549 days. In univariable and multivariable models, we found significant positive associations with involuntary admissions for ambient temperature and windspeed, with projected increases of up to 0.94% in involuntary admissions per degree Celsius temperature elevation. In the univariable analyses using all data, the strongest associations in terms of significance and explained variance were found for mean ambient temperature (<i>p</i> = 2.5 × 10<sup>-6</sup>, Variance Explained [<i>r</i><sup>2</sup>] = 0.096%) and maximum ambient temperature (<i>p</i> = 8.65 × 10<sup>-4</sup>, <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.072%). We did not find evidence that the lagged associations explain the associations for ambient temperature better than the direct associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mean ambient temperature is consistently but weakly associated with involuntary psychiatric admissions. Our findings set the stage for further epidemiological and mechanistic studies into this topic, as well as for modeling studies examining future involuntary psychiatric admissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":"68 1","pages":"e2"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795429/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142946932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-10DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1816
Hélène Verdoux, Robert A Bittner, Alkomiet Hasan, Mishal Qubad, Elias Wagner, Alexis Lepetit, Manuel Arrojo-Romero, Christian Bachmann, Marieke Beex-Oosterhuis, Jan Bogers, Andreja Celofiga, Dan Cohen, Domenico de Berardis, Marc de Hert, Carlos de Las Cuevas, Bjørn H Ebdrup, Konstantinos N Fountoulakis, Daniel Guinart, Dolores Keating, Miloslav Kopeček, John Lally, Judit Lazáry, Jurjen J Luykx, Olalla Maronas Amigo, Espen Molden, Jimmi Nielsen, Brian O'Donoghue, Pierre Oswald, Flavian S Radulescu, Christopher Rohde, Marina Sagud, Emilio J Sanz, Ivona Šimunović Filipčić, Iris E Sommer, Heidi Taipale, Jari Tiihonen, Heli Tuppurainen, Selene Veerman, Alina Wilkowska, Edoardo Spina, Peter Schulte
The European Clozapine Task Force is a group of psychiatrists and pharmacologists practicing in 18 countries under European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulation, who are deeply concerned about the underuse of clozapine in European countries. Although clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, a large proportion of them do not have access to this treatment. Concerns about clozapine-induced agranulocytosis and stringent blood monitoring rules are major barriers to clozapine prescribing and use. There is a growing body of evidence that the incidence of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis is very low after the first year of treatment. Maintaining lifelong monthly blood monitoring after this period contributes to unjustified discontinuation of clozapine. We leverage recent and replicated evidence on the long-term safety of clozapine to call for the revision and updating of the EMA's blood monitoring rules, thus aiming to overcome this major barrier to clozapine prescribing and use. We believe the time has come for relaxing the rules without increasing the risks for people using clozapine in Europe.
{"title":"The time has come for revising the rules of clozapine blood monitoring in Europe. A joint expert statement from the European Clozapine Task Force.","authors":"Hélène Verdoux, Robert A Bittner, Alkomiet Hasan, Mishal Qubad, Elias Wagner, Alexis Lepetit, Manuel Arrojo-Romero, Christian Bachmann, Marieke Beex-Oosterhuis, Jan Bogers, Andreja Celofiga, Dan Cohen, Domenico de Berardis, Marc de Hert, Carlos de Las Cuevas, Bjørn H Ebdrup, Konstantinos N Fountoulakis, Daniel Guinart, Dolores Keating, Miloslav Kopeček, John Lally, Judit Lazáry, Jurjen J Luykx, Olalla Maronas Amigo, Espen Molden, Jimmi Nielsen, Brian O'Donoghue, Pierre Oswald, Flavian S Radulescu, Christopher Rohde, Marina Sagud, Emilio J Sanz, Ivona Šimunović Filipčić, Iris E Sommer, Heidi Taipale, Jari Tiihonen, Heli Tuppurainen, Selene Veerman, Alina Wilkowska, Edoardo Spina, Peter Schulte","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1816","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1816","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European Clozapine Task Force is a group of psychiatrists and pharmacologists practicing in 18 countries under European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulation, who are deeply concerned about the underuse of clozapine in European countries. Although clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, a large proportion of them do not have access to this treatment. Concerns about clozapine-induced agranulocytosis and stringent blood monitoring rules are major barriers to clozapine prescribing and use. There is a growing body of evidence that the incidence of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis is very low after the first year of treatment. Maintaining lifelong monthly blood monitoring after this period contributes to unjustified discontinuation of clozapine. We leverage recent and replicated evidence on the long-term safety of clozapine to call for the revision and updating of the EMA's blood monitoring rules, thus aiming to overcome this major barrier to clozapine prescribing and use. We believe the time has come for relaxing the rules without increasing the risks for people using clozapine in Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e17"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822956/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142946927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-10DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1807
Andres Pemau, Alejandro de la Torre-Luque, Carolina Marin-Martin, Marina Diaz-Marsa, Jorge Andreo-Jover, Wala Ayad-Ahmed, Maria Fe Bravo Ortiz, Maria Teresa Bobes-Bascarán, Manuel Canal-Rivero, Irene Canosa García, Ana Isabel Cebrià, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, María Ángeles Boti, Matilde Elices, Ana González-Pinto, Iria Grande, Luis Jiménez-Treviño, Diego J Palao, Angela Palao-Tarrero, Carla Pérez-Guerra, Natalia Roberto, Miguel Ruiz Veguilla, Pilar A Sáiz, Víctor Pérez
Background: One of the most relevant risk factors for suicide is the presence of previous attempts. The symptomatic profile of people who reattempt suicide deserves attention. Network analysis is a promising tool to study this field.
Objective: To analyze the symptomatic network of patients who have attempted suicide recently and compare networks of people with several attempts and people with just one at baseline.
Methods: 1043 adult participants from the Spanish cohort "SURVIVE" were part of this study. Participants were classified into two groups: single attempt group (n = 390) and reattempt group (n = 653). Different network analyses were carried out to study the relationships between suicidal ideation, behavior, psychiatric symptoms, diagnoses, childhood trauma, and impulsivity. A general network and one for each subgroup were estimated.
Results: People with several suicide attempts at baseline scored significantly higher across all clinical scales. The symptomatic networks were equivalent in both groups of patients (p > .05). Although there were no overall differences between the networks, some nodes were more relevant according to group belonging.
Conclusions: People with a history of previous attempts have greater psychiatric symptom severity but the relationships between risk factors show the same structure when compared with the single attempt group. All risk factors deserve attention regardless of the number of attempts, but assessments can be adjusted to better monitor the occurrence of reattempts.
{"title":"Symptomatic networks in suicide attempt and reattempt: Relevance of psychiatric comorbidity.","authors":"Andres Pemau, Alejandro de la Torre-Luque, Carolina Marin-Martin, Marina Diaz-Marsa, Jorge Andreo-Jover, Wala Ayad-Ahmed, Maria Fe Bravo Ortiz, Maria Teresa Bobes-Bascarán, Manuel Canal-Rivero, Irene Canosa García, Ana Isabel Cebrià, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, María Ángeles Boti, Matilde Elices, Ana González-Pinto, Iria Grande, Luis Jiménez-Treviño, Diego J Palao, Angela Palao-Tarrero, Carla Pérez-Guerra, Natalia Roberto, Miguel Ruiz Veguilla, Pilar A Sáiz, Víctor Pérez","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1807","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1807","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the most relevant risk factors for suicide is the presence of previous attempts. The symptomatic profile of people who reattempt suicide deserves attention. Network analysis is a promising tool to study this field.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the symptomatic network of patients who have attempted suicide recently and compare networks of people with several attempts and people with just one at baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1043 adult participants from the Spanish cohort \"SURVIVE\" were part of this study. Participants were classified into two groups: single attempt group (n = 390) and reattempt group (n = 653). Different network analyses were carried out to study the relationships between suicidal ideation, behavior, psychiatric symptoms, diagnoses, childhood trauma, and impulsivity. A general network and one for each subgroup were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People with several suicide attempts at baseline scored significantly higher across all clinical scales. The symptomatic networks were equivalent in both groups of patients (p > .05). Although there were no overall differences between the networks, some nodes were more relevant according to group belonging.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People with a history of previous attempts have greater psychiatric symptom severity but the relationships between risk factors show the same structure when compared with the single attempt group. All risk factors deserve attention regardless of the number of attempts, but assessments can be adjusted to better monitor the occurrence of reattempts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":"68 1","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795427/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142946935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-09DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1805
Charles-Edouard Notredame, Chloé Saint-Dizier, Antoine Lamer, Erika Nogue, Emile Fares, Mohamed Lemdani, Guillauma Vaiva, Philippe Courtet, Emilie Olié
On January 9, 2022, Belgian pop singer Stromae performed his new hit "L'enfer" live on French TV. The song addresses his personal struggles with suicidal ideation. To evaluate the impact of Stromae's performance, we modeled the evolution of hospital admission rates for suicide attempts (SAs) in France, calls to the national suicide prevention helpline (3114), and Twitter publications mentioning the singer or the helpline. We employed the Gombay test to identify change points within each time series. We identified a significant increase in mean SA rates among women aged 20-24 years 6 days after the singer's performance. No similar effect was observed in the general population or other young age groups. The show was immediately followed by a peak in tweets referring to the singer, while Twitter activity related to the 3114 remained modest. We did not observe any increase in calls to the helpline. Celebrity testimonies about suicidal experiences can help alleviate stigma but should be accompanied by prevention messages to reduce the risk of contagion.
{"title":"The impact of the live broadcast of Stromae's song <i>L'enfer</i> on social media publications, calls to the national helpline, and suicide attempt rates in France.","authors":"Charles-Edouard Notredame, Chloé Saint-Dizier, Antoine Lamer, Erika Nogue, Emile Fares, Mohamed Lemdani, Guillauma Vaiva, Philippe Courtet, Emilie Olié","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1805","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1805","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On January 9, 2022, Belgian pop singer Stromae performed his new hit \"L'enfer\" live on French TV. The song addresses his personal struggles with suicidal ideation. To evaluate the impact of Stromae's performance, we modeled the evolution of hospital admission rates for suicide attempts (SAs) in France, calls to the national suicide prevention helpline (3114), and Twitter publications mentioning the singer or the helpline. We employed the Gombay test to identify change points within each time series. We identified a significant increase in mean SA rates among women aged 20-24 years 6 days after the singer's performance. No similar effect was observed in the general population or other young age groups. The show was immediately followed by a peak in tweets referring to the singer, while Twitter activity related to the 3114 remained modest. We did not observe any increase in calls to the helpline. Celebrity testimonies about suicidal experiences can help alleviate stigma but should be accompanied by prevention messages to reduce the risk of contagion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e14"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795438/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142946924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-08DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1814
Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Violeta Perez-Rodriguez, Javier de Otazu Olivares, Javier Camacho-Rubio, Aditya Sharma, Ana Catalán, Josefien Breedvelt, Claudia Aymerich, Mihai Pop, Carmen Moreno, Ian Kelleher, Jane Anderson, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Christoph U Correll, Allan H Young
Background: Estimating the risk of developing bipolar disorder (BD) in children and adolescents (C&A) with depressive disorders is important to optimize prevention and early intervention efforts. We aimed to quantitatively examine the risk of developing BD from depressive disorders and identify factors which moderate this development.
Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO:CRD42023431301), PubMed and Web-of-Science databases were searched for longitudinal studies reporting the percentage of C&A with ICD/DSM-defined depressive disorders who developed BD during follow-up. Data extraction, random-effects meta-analysis, between-study heterogeneity analysis, quality assessment, sub-group analyses, and meta-regressions were conducted.
Results: Thirty-nine studies were included, including 72,371 individuals (mean age=13.9 years, 57.1% females); 14.7% of C&A with a depressive disorder developed BD after 20.4-288 months: 9.5% developed BD-I (95% CI=4.7 to 18.1); 7.7% developed BD-II (95% CI=3.2% to 17.3%); 19.8% (95% CI=9.9% to 35.6%) of C&A admitted into the hospital with a depressive disorder developed BD. Studies using the DSM (21.6%, 95% CI=20.2% to 23.1%) and studies evaluating C&A with a major depressive disorder only (19.8%, 95% CI=16.8% to 23.1%) found higher rates of development of BD. Younger age at baseline, a history of hospitalization and recruitment from specialized clinics were associated with an increased risk of developing BD at follow-up. Quality of included studies was good in 76.9% of studies.
Conclusions: There is a substantial risk of developing BD in C&A with depressive disorders. This is particularly the case for C&A with MDD, DSM-diagnosed depressive disorders, and C&A admitted into the hospital. Research exploring additional predictors and preventive interventions is crucial.
{"title":"Development and predictors of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents with depressive disorders: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.","authors":"Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Violeta Perez-Rodriguez, Javier de Otazu Olivares, Javier Camacho-Rubio, Aditya Sharma, Ana Catalán, Josefien Breedvelt, Claudia Aymerich, Mihai Pop, Carmen Moreno, Ian Kelleher, Jane Anderson, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Christoph U Correll, Allan H Young","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1814","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1814","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estimating the risk of developing bipolar disorder (BD) in children and adolescents (C&A) with depressive disorders is important to optimize prevention and early intervention efforts. We aimed to quantitatively examine the risk of developing BD from depressive disorders and identify factors which moderate this development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO:CRD42023431301), PubMed and Web-of-Science databases were searched for longitudinal studies reporting the percentage of C&A with ICD/DSM-defined depressive disorders who developed BD during follow-up. Data extraction, random-effects meta-analysis, between-study heterogeneity analysis, quality assessment, sub-group analyses, and meta-regressions were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine studies were included, including 72,371 individuals (mean age=13.9 years, 57.1% females); 14.7% of C&A with a depressive disorder developed BD after 20.4-288 months: 9.5% developed BD-I (95% CI=4.7 to 18.1); 7.7% developed BD-II (95% CI=3.2% to 17.3%); 19.8% (95% CI=9.9% to 35.6%) of C&A admitted into the hospital with a depressive disorder developed BD. Studies using the DSM (21.6%, 95% CI=20.2% to 23.1%) and studies evaluating C&A with a major depressive disorder only (19.8%, 95% CI=16.8% to 23.1%) found higher rates of development of BD. Younger age at baseline, a history of hospitalization and recruitment from specialized clinics were associated with an increased risk of developing BD at follow-up. Quality of included studies was good in 76.9% of studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a substantial risk of developing BD in C&A with depressive disorders. This is particularly the case for C&A with MDD, DSM-diagnosed depressive disorders, and C&A admitted into the hospital. Research exploring additional predictors and preventive interventions is crucial.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e16"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822963/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142946902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Martin Bernstorff, Lasse Hansen, Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen, Andreas Aalkjær Danielsen, Søren Dinesen Østergaard
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is twice as prevalent among individuals with mental illness compared to the general population. Prevention strategies exist but require accurate risk prediction. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model for predicting incident CVD among patients with mental illness using routine clinical data from electronic health records.
Methods: A cohort study was conducted using data from 74,880 patients with 1.6 million psychiatric service contacts in the Central Denmark Region from 2013 to 2021. Two machine learning models (XGBoost and regularised logistic regression) were trained on 85% of the data from six hospitals using 234 potential predictors. The best-performing model was externally validated on the remaining 15% of patients from another three hospitals. CVD was defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral arterial disease.
Results: The best-performing model (hyperparameter-tuned XGBoost) demonstrated acceptable discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84 on the training set and 0.74 on the validation set. It identified high-risk individuals 2.5 years before CVD events. For the psychiatric service contacts in the top 5% of predicted risk, the positive predictive value was 5%, and the negative predictive value was 99%. The model issued at least one positive prediction for 39% of patients who developed CVD.
Conclusions: A machine learning model can accurately predict CVD risk among patients with mental illness using routinely collected electronic health record data. A decision support system building on this approach may aid primary CVD prevention in this high-risk population.
{"title":"Predicting cardiovascular disease in patients with mental illness using machine learning.","authors":"Martin Bernstorff, Lasse Hansen, Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen, Andreas Aalkjær Danielsen, Søren Dinesen Østergaard","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.1","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is twice as prevalent among individuals with mental illness compared to the general population. Prevention strategies exist but require accurate risk prediction. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model for predicting incident CVD among patients with mental illness using routine clinical data from electronic health records.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study was conducted using data from 74,880 patients with 1.6 million psychiatric service contacts in the Central Denmark Region from 2013 to 2021. Two machine learning models (XGBoost and regularised logistic regression) were trained on 85% of the data from six hospitals using 234 potential predictors. The best-performing model was externally validated on the remaining 15% of patients from another three hospitals. CVD was defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral arterial disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best-performing model (hyperparameter-tuned XGBoost) demonstrated acceptable discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84 on the training set and 0.74 on the validation set. It identified high-risk individuals 2.5 years before CVD events. For the psychiatric service contacts in the top 5% of predicted risk, the positive predictive value was 5%, and the negative predictive value was 99%. The model issued at least one positive prediction for 39% of patients who developed CVD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A machine learning model can accurately predict CVD risk among patients with mental illness using routinely collected electronic health record data. A decision support system building on this approach may aid primary CVD prevention in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e12"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822960/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142946908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-27DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1799
Alexandra Doncarli, Virginie Demiguel, Camille Le Ray, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Elodie Lebreton, Gisèle Apter, Julie Boudet-Berquier, Catherine Crenn-Hebert, Marie-Noëlle Vacheron, Nolwenn Regnault, Sarah Tebeka
Background: Postpartum anxiety (PPA) symptoms have harmful effects on child development and mother-infant interactions. Accordingly, in-depth knowledge of associated risk factors is crucial for prevention policies. This study aimed to estimate PPA symptom prevalence at 2 months and to identify associated risk factors in a representative sample of all women who gave birth in France in 2021, and in two subgroups: women with no postpartum depression (PPD) symptoms, and those with no history of mental health care.
Methods: Among the 12,723 women included in the representative French national perinatal survey 2021ENP, 7,133 completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) self-administered questionnaire - including three anxiety-specific items (EPDS-3A) - at 2 months postpartum. We estimated the adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) of PPA symptoms using Poisson regression models with robust variance.
Results: PPA symptom prevalence at 2 months was 27.6% (95% CI [26.5-28.8]). Associated risk factors were: age ≤ 34 years (maximum aPR = 1.38 [1.22-1.58] obtained for persons aged 25-29 years vs. 35-39 years), poorer health literacy (1.15 [1.07-1.23]), a history of medical termination of pregnancy (1.32 [1.05-1.68]), psychological (1.31 [1.17-1.47]) or psychiatric (1.42 [1.24-1.63]) care history since adolescence, nulliparity (1.23 [1.12-1.35]), no weight gain or loss (1.29 [1.03-1.61] vs. 9-15 kg gain) or gain ≥23 kg (1.20 [1.00-1.43]) during pregnancy, ≥3 pregnancy-related emergency consultations (1.16 [1.03-1.31] vs. none), poor/good support during pregnancy, (1.16 [1.00-1.34] and 1.15 [1.05-1.26], respectively, vs. very good), sadness (1.52 [1.36-1.69]), anhedonia (1.48 [1.27-1.72]), or both (1.99 [1.79-2.21]) during pregnancy, not at all/not very satisfied with pain management during childbirth (1.16 [1.01-1.32] vs. quite/very satisfied). Similar risk factors were found in the 'no PPD symptoms' and 'no history of mental health care' subgroups.
Conclusions: Estimated PPA symptom prevalence at 2 months in our study sample was 27.6%. The risk factors we identified may guide future prevention policies.
{"title":"Prevalence of anxiety symptoms and associated factors at 2 months postpartum, results from a 2021 French national prospective cohort study.","authors":"Alexandra Doncarli, Virginie Demiguel, Camille Le Ray, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Elodie Lebreton, Gisèle Apter, Julie Boudet-Berquier, Catherine Crenn-Hebert, Marie-Noëlle Vacheron, Nolwenn Regnault, Sarah Tebeka","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1799","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1799","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postpartum anxiety (PPA) symptoms have harmful effects on child development and mother-infant interactions. Accordingly, in-depth knowledge of associated risk factors is crucial for prevention policies. This study aimed to estimate PPA symptom prevalence at 2 months and to identify associated risk factors in a representative sample of all women who gave birth in France in 2021, and in two subgroups: women with no postpartum depression (PPD) symptoms, and those with no history of mental health care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among the 12,723 women included in the representative French national perinatal survey 2021ENP, 7,133 completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) self-administered questionnaire - including three anxiety-specific items (EPDS-3A) - at 2 months postpartum. We estimated the adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) of PPA symptoms using Poisson regression models with robust variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PPA symptom prevalence at 2 months was 27.6% (95% CI [26.5-28.8]). Associated risk factors were: age ≤ 34 years (maximum aPR = 1.38 [1.22-1.58] obtained for persons aged 25-29 years vs. 35-39 years), poorer health literacy (1.15 [1.07-1.23]), a history of medical termination of pregnancy (1.32 [1.05-1.68]), psychological (1.31 [1.17-1.47]) or psychiatric (1.42 [1.24-1.63]) care history since adolescence, nulliparity (1.23 [1.12-1.35]), no weight gain or loss (1.29 [1.03-1.61] vs. 9-15 kg gain) or gain ≥23 kg (1.20 [1.00-1.43]) during pregnancy, ≥3 pregnancy-related emergency consultations (1.16 [1.03-1.31] vs. none), poor/good support during pregnancy, (1.16 [1.00-1.34] and 1.15 [1.05-1.26], respectively, vs. very good), sadness (1.52 [1.36-1.69]), anhedonia (1.48 [1.27-1.72]), or both (1.99 [1.79-2.21]) during pregnancy, not at all/not very satisfied with pain management during childbirth (1.16 [1.01-1.32] vs. quite/very satisfied). Similar risk factors were found in the 'no PPD symptoms' and 'no history of mental health care' subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Estimated PPA symptom prevalence at 2 months in our study sample was 27.6%. The risk factors we identified may guide future prevention policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":"67 1","pages":"e89"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733619/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142893260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-27DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1802
Jorge Lopez-Castroman, Antonio Artés-Rodríguez, Philippe Courtet, Cecile Hanon, Tomasz Gondek, Enrique Baca-García, Umberto Volpe
{"title":"The growing need to integrate digital mental health into psychiatric and medical education.","authors":"Jorge Lopez-Castroman, Antonio Artés-Rodríguez, Philippe Courtet, Cecile Hanon, Tomasz Gondek, Enrique Baca-García, Umberto Volpe","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1802","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1802","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":"67 1","pages":"e90"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733613/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142893262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1804
Alison T Rossier, Brian Hallahan
Background: While omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have shown promise as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, the overall consensus about their efficacy across studies is still lacking and findings to date are inconclusive. No clinical trials or systematic reviews have yet examined if omega-3 PUFAs are associated with differential levels of efficacy at various stages of psychosis.
Method: A systematic bibliographic search of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect of omega-3 PUFAs as a monotherapy or adjunctive therapy versus a control group in adults and children at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis, experiencing a first-episode psychosis (FEP), or diagnosed with an established psychotic disorder was conducted. Participants' clinical symptoms were evaluated using total and subscale scores on validated psychometric scales.
Results: No beneficial effect of omega-3 PUFAs treatment was found in comparison with that of placebo (G = -0.26, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.03, p = 0.08). Treatment of omega-3 PUFAs did not prove any significant improvement in psychopathology in UHR (G = -0.09, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.27, p = 0.63), FEP (G = -1.20, 95% CI -5.63 to 3.22, p = 0.59), or schizophrenia patients (G = -0.17, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.03, p = 0.10).
Conclusion: These findings confirm previous evidence that disputes the original reported findings of the beneficial effect of omega-3 PUFAs in schizophrenia. Furthermore, accumulative evidence of the use of omega-3 as a preventive treatment option in UHR is not supported, suggesting that the need for future studies in this line of research should not be promoted.
背景:虽然omega-3多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFAs)作为精神分裂症和其他精神疾病的辅助治疗已经显示出希望,但关于其疗效的总体共识在研究中仍然缺乏,迄今为止的发现也不确定。目前还没有临床试验或系统评价研究omega-3 PUFAs是否与不同精神病阶段的不同疗效水平有关。方法:对随机双盲安慰剂对照试验(rct)进行系统的文献检索,研究omega-3 PUFAs作为单一疗法或辅助疗法与对照组在精神病超高风险(UHR)、经历首发精神病(FEP)或确诊为精神病的成人和儿童中进行的效果。在有效的心理测量量表上使用总分和亚量表评分来评估参与者的临床症状。结果:与安慰剂相比,未发现omega-3 PUFAs治疗的有益效果(G = -0.26, 95% CI -0.55至0.03,p = 0.08)。omega-3 PUFAs治疗未证明对UHR (G = -0.09, 95% CI -0.45至0.27,p = 0.63)、FEP (G = -1.20, 95% CI -5.63至3.22,p = 0.59)或精神分裂症患者(G = -0.17, 95% CI -0.38至-0.03,p = 0.10)的精神病理有任何显著改善。结论:这些发现证实了先前的证据,这些证据与最初报道的omega-3 PUFAs对精神分裂症有益的发现存在争议。此外,在UHR中使用omega-3作为一种预防性治疗选择的累积证据并不支持,这表明不应该促进这方面研究的未来研究。
{"title":"The therapeutic effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on symptom severity of psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Alison T Rossier, Brian Hallahan","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1804","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1804","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have shown promise as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, the overall consensus about their efficacy across studies is still lacking and findings to date are inconclusive. No clinical trials or systematic reviews have yet examined if omega-3 PUFAs are associated with differential levels of efficacy at various stages of psychosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic bibliographic search of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect of omega-3 PUFAs as a monotherapy or adjunctive therapy versus a control group in adults and children at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis, experiencing a first-episode psychosis (FEP), or diagnosed with an established psychotic disorder was conducted. Participants' clinical symptoms were evaluated using total and subscale scores on validated psychometric scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No beneficial effect of omega-3 PUFAs treatment was found in comparison with that of placebo (<i>G</i> = -0.26, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.08). Treatment of omega-3 PUFAs did not prove any significant improvement in psychopathology in UHR (<i>G</i> = -0.09, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.27, <i>p</i> = 0.63), FEP (<i>G</i> = -1.20, 95% CI -5.63 to 3.22, <i>p</i> = 0.59), or schizophrenia patients (<i>G</i> = -0.17, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings confirm previous evidence that disputes the original reported findings of the beneficial effect of omega-3 PUFAs in schizophrenia. Furthermore, accumulative evidence of the use of omega-3 as a preventive treatment option in UHR is not supported, suggesting that the need for future studies in this line of research should not be promoted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":"67 1","pages":"e88"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733620/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142853183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}