Pub Date : 2025-04-03DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2444
Shi Han Ang, Siddarth Venkateswaran, Mahir Bakulkumar Goda, Kuhanesan N C Naidu, Ganesh Kudva Kundadak, Mythily Subramaniam
Background: Suicide remains a major risk factor for individuals suffering from schizophrenia and its prodromal state (i.e., Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis). However, less is known about the prevalence of suicidal behaviour among the adolescent and youth UHR population, a demographic vulnerable to the psychosocial and environmental risk factors of suicide. This review aims to synthesise existing literature on the prevalence of suicidal ideation and behaviour in the adolescent and youth at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis (UHR), and the associations between suicidal behaviour and its correlates.
Methods: The databases PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were accessed up to July 2024. A meta-analysis of prevalence was subsequently performed for lifetime suicidal ideation, lifetime non-suicidal self-injury, lifetime suicidal attempt, and current suicidal ideation. A narrative review was also carried out for the correlates of suicidal behaviour amongst adolescents and youth in the UHR population.
Results: Studies were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed a high prevalence of lifetime suicidal ideation (58%), lifetime non-suicidal self-injury (37%), lifetime suicidal attempt (25%), and current (2 week) suicidal ideation (56%). The narrative review revealed that a personal transition to psychosis and a positive family history of psychosis were associated with suicidal attempts, while depression was associated with both suicidal attempts and suicidal ideation.
Conclusion: The prevalence of suicidal ideation and behaviour among UHR adolescents and youth is high and comparable to that of the general UHR population. Existing measures that mitigate suicide risk in the general UHR population should be adopted for the youth context.
背景:自杀仍然是精神分裂症及其前驱状态(即精神病超高风险)患者的主要危险因素。然而,对于青少年和青少年UHR人群中自杀行为的流行情况知之甚少,这是一个易受自杀心理社会和环境风险因素影响的人群。这篇综述的目的是综合现有的关于自杀意念和行为在青少年和精神病超高风险(UHR)青少年中的流行程度的文献,以及自杀行为及其相关因素之间的联系。方法:检索截至2024年7月的PsycINFO、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Scopus等数据库。随后对终生自杀意念、终生非自杀性自伤、终生自杀企图和当前自杀意念的流行率进行了荟萃分析。还对难民专员办事处人口中青少年和青年自杀行为的相关因素进行了叙述审查。结果:本meta分析纳入了研究。荟萃分析显示,终生自杀意念(58%)、终生非自杀性自伤(37%)、终生自杀企图(25%)和当前(2周)自杀意念(56%)的患病率很高。叙述性回顾显示,个人向精神病的过渡和积极的精神病家族史与自杀企图有关,而抑郁症与自杀企图和自杀意念都有关。结论:UHR青少年和青年中自杀意念和行为的流行率很高,与一般UHR人群相当。应在青少年情况下采用减轻一般高危人群自杀风险的现有措施。
{"title":"Prevalence of suicidal behaviour in adolescents and youth at ultra-high risk for psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shi Han Ang, Siddarth Venkateswaran, Mahir Bakulkumar Goda, Kuhanesan N C Naidu, Ganesh Kudva Kundadak, Mythily Subramaniam","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2444","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2444","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide remains a major risk factor for individuals suffering from schizophrenia and its prodromal state (i.e., Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis). However, less is known about the prevalence of suicidal behaviour among the adolescent and youth UHR population, a demographic vulnerable to the psychosocial and environmental risk factors of suicide. This review aims to synthesise existing literature on the prevalence of suicidal ideation and behaviour in the adolescent and youth at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis (UHR), and the associations between suicidal behaviour and its correlates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were accessed up to July 2024. A meta-analysis of prevalence was subsequently performed for lifetime suicidal ideation, lifetime non-suicidal self-injury, lifetime suicidal attempt, and current suicidal ideation. A narrative review was also carried out for the correlates of suicidal behaviour amongst adolescents and youth in the UHR population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studies were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed a high prevalence of lifetime suicidal ideation (58%), lifetime non-suicidal self-injury (37%), lifetime suicidal attempt (25%), and current (2 week) suicidal ideation (56%). The narrative review revealed that a personal transition to psychosis and a positive family history of psychosis were associated with suicidal attempts, while depression was associated with both suicidal attempts and suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of suicidal ideation and behaviour among UHR adolescents and youth is high and comparable to that of the general UHR population. Existing measures that mitigate suicide risk in the general UHR population should be adopted for the youth context.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e56"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090029/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143771813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-02DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2443
Thomas Fovet, Kevin D'Ovidio, Marion Eck, Imane Benradia, Stéphane Duhem, Camille Lancelevée, Pierre Thomas, Marielle Wathelet, Ali Amad
Background: The mental health of incarcerated individuals is a widely recognized public health issue, but little is known about the mental health status of the incarcerated individuals upon release. This study aimed to measure the prevalence of psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders (SUDs) among incarcerated men scheduled to be released from jail soon.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional national survey from September 2020 to September 2022 across 26 jails (selected at random) in France. Each participant was interviewed within 30 days prior to their release via a structured questionnaire, including the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview.
Results: A total of 579 individuals were included in the analysis (participation rate: 66.2%). The prevalence of mood disorders, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, and psychotic episodes were 30.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.1%-34.6%), 28.7% (95% CI: 25.1%-32.5%), 11.1% (95% CI: 8.8%-13.9%), and 10.5% (95% CI: 8.3%-13.3%), respectively. Additionally, almost half of the individuals had an SUD, and dual disorders were identified in 21.9% (95% CI: 18.8%-25.5%) of the cases. The analysis of mental health care pathways raised questions about access to certain types of care, such as full-time psychiatric hospitalization while in prison, as well as questions about the continuity of care upon release.
Conclusions: This study shows that the mental health of incarcerated men who are scheduled to be released soon is precarious. Complex mental health problems, particularly dual disorders, are common and require better coordination between mental health care systems in prisons and the community.
{"title":"Psychiatric disorders and mental health care among incarcerated men: A prerelease cross-sectional study in France.","authors":"Thomas Fovet, Kevin D'Ovidio, Marion Eck, Imane Benradia, Stéphane Duhem, Camille Lancelevée, Pierre Thomas, Marielle Wathelet, Ali Amad","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2443","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2443","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mental health of incarcerated individuals is a widely recognized public health issue, but little is known about the mental health status of the incarcerated individuals upon release. This study aimed to measure the prevalence of psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders (SUDs) among incarcerated men scheduled to be released from jail soon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional national survey from September 2020 to September 2022 across 26 jails (selected at random) in France. Each participant was interviewed within 30 days prior to their release <i>via</i> a structured questionnaire, including the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 579 individuals were included in the analysis (participation rate: 66.2%). The prevalence of mood disorders, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, and psychotic episodes were 30.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.1%-34.6%), 28.7% (95% CI: 25.1%-32.5%), 11.1% (95% CI: 8.8%-13.9%), and 10.5% (95% CI: 8.3%-13.3%), respectively. Additionally, almost half of the individuals had an SUD, and dual disorders were identified in 21.9% (95% CI: 18.8%-25.5%) of the cases. The analysis of mental health care pathways raised questions about access to certain types of care, such as full-time psychiatric hospitalization while in prison, as well as questions about the continuity of care upon release.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that the mental health of incarcerated men who are scheduled to be released soon is precarious. Complex mental health problems, particularly dual disorders, are common and require better coordination between mental health care systems in prisons and the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e66"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188331/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143763235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maximilien Redon, Jordan Virolle, François Montastruc, Simon Taïb, Alexis Revet, Julien Da Costa, Etienne Very
Background: Catatonia in psychotic patients presents unique challenges. While antipsychotics are the cornerstone of schizophrenia treatment, their use in catatonic patients is sometimes discouraged for fear of worsening the signs. Reports on the successful use of second-generation antipsychotics have been published. We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines to describe the outcomes of antipsychotic-treated catatonic events.
Methods: We searched Medline and Web of Science databases from 2000 to 2023 using search terms including "catatonia" and "antipsychotic agents" for all original peer-reviewed articles, including clinical trials, observational studies, and case-reports. We included antipsychotic-treated catatonic events and extracted data on patient characteristics, pharmacological context, agent involved, and treatment outcomes for each antipsychotic trial.
Results: After screening 6,219 records, 79 full-text articles were included. Among them, we identified 175 antipsychotic trials (in 110 patients). Only 41.1% of the patients benefited from a previous benzodiazepine trial. Antipsychotic use was considered beneficial in 60.0% of the trials, neutral in 29.1%, and harmful in 10.9%. Trials tended to be reported as beneficial for amisulpride, clozapine, and risperidone, equivocal for aripiprazole and olanzapine, and mostly detrimental for haloperidol and quetiapine. Psychotic disorders were the most common underlying etiology (65.8%).
Conclusions: Antipsychotics could be an option in the treatment of catatonia in psychotic patients. However, with few exceptions, we found non-beneficial outcomes with all second-generation antipsychotics in varying proportions in this largest review to date. Although olanzapine is widely used, it is associated with mitigated reported outcomes.
背景:精神病患者的紧张症呈现出独特的挑战。虽然抗精神病药物是精神分裂症治疗的基石,但由于担心症状恶化,有时不鼓励在紧张性精神病患者中使用抗精神病药物。关于成功使用第二代抗精神病药物的报告已经发表。我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行了系统评价,以描述抗精神病药物治疗的紧张性事件的结果。方法:我们在Medline和Web of Science数据库中检索2000年至2023年的所有原始同行评审文章,检索词包括“紧张症”和“抗精神病药物”,包括临床试验、观察性研究和病例报告。我们纳入了抗精神病药物治疗的紧张性事件,并提取了每个抗精神病药物试验的患者特征、药理学背景、涉及的药物和治疗结果的数据。结果:经筛选6219条记录,纳入79篇全文文章。其中,我们确定了175项抗精神病药物试验(110例患者)。只有41.1%的患者从之前的苯二氮卓类药物试验中获益。60.0%的试验认为抗精神病药物的使用是有益的,29.1%为中性,10.9%为有害的。试验倾向于报告对氨硫pride、氯氮平和利培酮有利,对阿立哌唑和奥氮平模棱两可,对氟哌啶醇和喹硫平大多有害。精神障碍是最常见的潜在病因(65.8%)。结论:抗精神病药物可作为精神病患者治疗紧张症的一种选择。然而,除了少数例外,我们发现所有第二代抗精神病药物的非有益结果在这一迄今为止最大的综述中有不同的比例。虽然奥氮平被广泛使用,但它与报道的预后减轻有关。
{"title":"The use of antipsychotics in the treatment of catatonia: a systematic review.","authors":"Maximilien Redon, Jordan Virolle, François Montastruc, Simon Taïb, Alexis Revet, Julien Da Costa, Etienne Very","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.9","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catatonia in psychotic patients presents unique challenges. While antipsychotics are the cornerstone of schizophrenia treatment, their use in catatonic patients is sometimes discouraged for fear of worsening the signs. Reports on the successful use of second-generation antipsychotics have been published. We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines to describe the outcomes of antipsychotic-treated catatonic events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline and Web of Science databases from 2000 to 2023 using search terms including \"catatonia\" and \"antipsychotic agents\" for all original peer-reviewed articles, including clinical trials, observational studies, and case-reports. We included antipsychotic-treated catatonic events and extracted data on patient characteristics, pharmacological context, agent involved, and treatment outcomes for each antipsychotic trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening 6,219 records, 79 full-text articles were included. Among them, we identified 175 antipsychotic trials (in 110 patients). Only 41.1% of the patients benefited from a previous benzodiazepine trial. Antipsychotic use was considered beneficial in 60.0% of the trials, neutral in 29.1%, and harmful in 10.9%. Trials tended to be reported as beneficial for amisulpride, clozapine, and risperidone, equivocal for aripiprazole and olanzapine, and mostly detrimental for haloperidol and quetiapine. Psychotic disorders were the most common underlying etiology (65.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antipsychotics could be an option in the treatment of catatonia in psychotic patients. However, with few exceptions, we found non-beneficial outcomes with all second-generation antipsychotics in varying proportions in this largest review to date. Although olanzapine is widely used, it is associated with mitigated reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e48"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041727/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143691142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-24DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2440
Jonas Denduyver, Johan Detraux, Justien Weydts, Marc De Hert
Background: It is widely known that people with a severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) are more at risk of poor physical health outcomes because of disparities in healthcare access and provision. Less is known about the quality of end-of-life (EoL) care in people with SPMI who have a life-limiting disease.
Methods: A comprehensive and systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL electronic databases (from inception to November 2023) was conducted, without language restriction, for reviews on EoL care and/or palliative sedation for people with SPMI and a life-limiting disease. A critical appraisal of the selected reviews was performed. Data were analyzed according to the four principles of biomedical ethics.
Results: Ten reviews were included. These show that people with SPMI are at risk of suboptimal EoL care. Stigma among healthcare professionals, lack of integrated care policies, absence of advanced care planning, and insufficient expertise and training in palliative care of psychiatrists have been identified as key challenges to the provision of adequate EoL care for people with SPMI. No data were found about palliative sedation.
Conclusions: To optimize palliative and EoL care for SPMI patients with a life-limiting disease, a policy of coordinated and integrated mental and physical healthcare is needed. Moreover, education and training initiatives to reduce stigma and discrimination among all healthcare workers and to enhance palliative care skills in psychiatrists should be offered. Finally, more research is needed on EoL particularly on palliative sedation for people with SPMI and a life-limiting disease.
背景:众所周知,患有严重和持续性精神疾病(SPMI)的人由于医疗保健可及性和提供方面的差异,更容易出现不良的身体健康结果。对于患有限制生命的疾病的SPMI患者的生命末期(EoL)护理质量知之甚少。方法:在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus和CINAHL电子数据库(从成立到2023年11月)中进行全面、系统的文献检索,不受语言限制,对SPMI和限制性疾病患者的EoL护理和/或姑息性镇静进行综述。对选定的审查进行了严格的评估。根据生物医学伦理学的四项原则对数据进行分析。结果:纳入10篇综述。这些结果表明,患有SPMI的人有接受次优EoL护理的风险。医疗保健专业人员的耻辱感,缺乏综合护理政策,缺乏先进的护理计划,以及精神科医生在姑息治疗方面的专业知识和培训不足,已被确定为为SPMI患者提供适当的EoL护理的主要挑战。未发现有关姑息性镇静的资料。结论:为优化伴有限制生命疾病的SPMI患者的姑息治疗和EoL护理,需要制定协调和综合的身心保健政策。此外,应提供教育和培训举措,以减少对所有卫生保健工作者的羞辱和歧视,并提高精神科医生的姑息治疗技能。最后,需要对EoL进行更多的研究,特别是对患有SPMI和限制生命的疾病的人进行姑息性镇静。
{"title":"End-of-life care for people with severe and persistent mental illness and a life-limiting disease: An umbrella review.","authors":"Jonas Denduyver, Johan Detraux, Justien Weydts, Marc De Hert","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2440","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2440","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is widely known that people with a severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) are more at risk of poor physical health outcomes because of disparities in healthcare access and provision. Less is known about the quality of end-of-life (EoL) care in people with SPMI who have a life-limiting disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive and systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL electronic databases (from inception to November 2023) was conducted, without language restriction, for reviews on EoL care and/or palliative sedation for people with SPMI and a life-limiting disease. A critical appraisal of the selected reviews was performed. Data were analyzed according to the four principles of biomedical ethics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten reviews were included. These show that people with SPMI are at risk of suboptimal EoL care. Stigma among healthcare professionals, lack of integrated care policies, absence of advanced care planning, and insufficient expertise and training in palliative care of psychiatrists have been identified as key challenges to the provision of adequate EoL care for people with SPMI. No data were found about palliative sedation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To optimize palliative and EoL care for SPMI patients with a life-limiting disease, a policy of coordinated and integrated mental and physical healthcare is needed. Moreover, education and training initiatives to reduce stigma and discrimination among all healthcare workers and to enhance palliative care skills in psychiatrists should be offered. Finally, more research is needed on EoL particularly on palliative sedation for people with SPMI and a life-limiting disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e49"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041735/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143691089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-20DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2417
Sabine Weber, Daniel König, Thomas Waldhoer, Brendon Stubbs, Theresa Lichtenstein, Armin Trojer, Lea Sommer, Benjamin Vyssoki, Melanie Trimmel, Fabian Friedrich, Stephan Listabarth
Background: The prevalence of alcohol use disorder among older adults is increasing, with this population being particularly vulnerable to alcohol's detrimental effects. While knowledge of preventative factors is scarce, physical activity has emerged as a potential modifiable protective factor. This study aimed to examine associations between alcohol consumption and physical activity in a large-scale, multi-national prospective study of the older adult population.
Methods: Longitudinal data from the SHARE study on physical activity, alcohol consumption, demographic, socioeconomic, and health variables, were analyzed in older adults. Individual-level data were examined using logistic regression models. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal models were calculated to account for potential latency in the association between physical activity and alcohol consumption.
Results: The study included 3133 participants from 13 countries. Higher physical activity levels were significantly associated with higher alcohol consumption in cross-sectional (p = 0.0004) and longitudinal analyses (p = 0.0045) over a median follow-up of 6 years. While the presence of depressive symptoms and higher educational attainment were associated with higher alcohol consumption, female sex and persons with lower perceived health showed lower frequency of alcohol consumption. Additionally, the country of residence also proved to be a relevant factor for alcohol consumption.
Conclusions: Higher levels of physical activity showed an association with higher alcohol consumption in older adults. Future research should investigate whether this association is causal and underpinned by neurobiological, social, or methodological factors.
{"title":"Physical activity in older adults as a predictor of alcohol consumption - a longitudinal analysis of 3133 individuals in the SHARE study.","authors":"Sabine Weber, Daniel König, Thomas Waldhoer, Brendon Stubbs, Theresa Lichtenstein, Armin Trojer, Lea Sommer, Benjamin Vyssoki, Melanie Trimmel, Fabian Friedrich, Stephan Listabarth","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2417","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2417","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of alcohol use disorder among older adults is increasing, with this population being particularly vulnerable to alcohol's detrimental effects. While knowledge of preventative factors is scarce, physical activity has emerged as a potential modifiable protective factor. This study aimed to examine associations between alcohol consumption and physical activity in a large-scale, multi-national prospective study of the older adult population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal data from the SHARE study on physical activity, alcohol consumption, demographic, socioeconomic, and health variables, were analyzed in older adults. Individual-level data were examined using logistic regression models. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal models were calculated to account for potential latency in the association between physical activity and alcohol consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 3133 participants from 13 countries. Higher physical activity levels were significantly associated with higher alcohol consumption in cross-sectional (<i>p</i> = 0.0004) and longitudinal analyses (<i>p</i> = 0.0045) over a median follow-up of 6 years. While the presence of depressive symptoms and higher educational attainment were associated with higher alcohol consumption, female sex and persons with lower perceived health showed lower frequency of alcohol consumption. Additionally, the country of residence also proved to be a relevant factor for alcohol consumption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher levels of physical activity showed an association with higher alcohol consumption in older adults. Future research should investigate whether this association is causal and underpinned by neurobiological, social, or methodological factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e47"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041726/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143663057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-12DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.31
Daiyan Zhang, Maria Semkovska
Background: Depression affects twice as many women as men. Risk factors for depression certainly impact this difference, but their strong interconnectedness challenges the assessment of standalone contributions. Network models allow the identification of systematic independent relationships between individual symptoms and risk factors. This study aimed to evaluate whether the extended networks of depressive symptoms, cognitive functions, and leisure activities in like-sex twins differ depending on gender or zygosity.
Methods: Twins, including 2,040 women (918 monozygotic and 1,122 dizygotic) and 1,712 men (730 monozygotic and 982 dizygotic), were selected from the Danish Twin Registry for having, along with their like-sex co-twin, completed measures of depressive symptoms, cognition, and leisure activities (physical, intellectual, and social). Network models were estimated and compared at three levels: co-twins to each other within groups defined by gender and zygosity; monozygotic to dizygotic twins within the same gender, and between genders.
Results: No significant differences were observed when co-twins were compared to each other, regardless of the pair's zygosity or gender, nor when monozygotic twins were compared to dizygotic twins within gender. However, the gendered networks differed significantly in global strength, structure, and partial correlations between specific depressive symptoms and risk factors, all indicating stronger connectedness in women relative to men.
Conclusions: Environmental factors appear to best explain between-gender network differences. Women's networks showed significantly stronger associations both among depressive symptoms and between depressive symptoms and risk factors (i.e., decreased cognition and leisure activities). Longitudinal research is needed to determine the causality and directionality of these relationships.
{"title":"Gender differences in like-sex middle-aged twins: an extended network analysis of depressive symptoms, cognitive functions and leisure activities.","authors":"Daiyan Zhang, Maria Semkovska","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.31","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.31","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression affects twice as many women as men. Risk factors for depression certainly impact this difference, but their strong interconnectedness challenges the assessment of standalone contributions. Network models allow the identification of systematic independent relationships between individual symptoms and risk factors. This study aimed to evaluate whether the extended networks of depressive symptoms, cognitive functions, and leisure activities in like-sex twins differ depending on gender or zygosity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twins, including 2,040 women (918 monozygotic and 1,122 dizygotic) and 1,712 men (730 monozygotic and 982 dizygotic), were selected from the Danish Twin Registry for having, along with their like-sex co-twin, completed measures of depressive symptoms, cognition, and leisure activities (physical, intellectual, and social). Network models were estimated and compared at three levels: co-twins to each other within groups defined by gender and zygosity; monozygotic to dizygotic twins within the same gender, and between genders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed when co-twins were compared to each other, regardless of the pair's zygosity or gender, nor when monozygotic twins were compared to dizygotic twins within gender. However, the gendered networks differed significantly in global strength, structure, and partial correlations between specific depressive symptoms and risk factors, all indicating stronger connectedness in women relative to men.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Environmental factors appear to best explain between-gender network differences. Women's networks showed significantly stronger associations both among depressive symptoms and between depressive symptoms and risk factors (i.e., decreased cognition and leisure activities). Longitudinal research is needed to determine the causality and directionality of these relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e46"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041731/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143604427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-05DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10
Juan Pablo Chart-Pascual, Javier Goena, Francisco Lara, María Montero Torres, Julen Marin Napal, Rodrigo Muñoz, Cielo García Montero, Oscar Fraile Martínez, Miguel Ángel Ortega, Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Ana González Pinto, Javier Quintero, Melchor Alvarez-Mon, Miguel Ángel Álvarez-Mon
Background: Antidepressants are essential in managing depression, including treatment-resistant cases. Public perceptions of these medications, shaped by social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter), can influence treatment adherence and outcomes. This study explores public attitudes toward antidepressants through sentiment and topic modeling analysis of tweets in English and Spanish from 2007 to 2022.
Methods: Tweets mentioning antidepressants approved for depression were collected. The analysis focused on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and glutamatergic drugs. Sentiment analysis and topic modeling were conducted to identify trends, concerns, and emotions in discussions across both languages.
Results: A total of 1,448,674 tweets were analyzed (1,013,128 in English and 435,546 in Spanish). SSRIs were the most mentioned antidepressants (27.9% in English, 58.91% in Spanish). Pricing and availability were key concerns in English tweets, while Spanish tweets highlighted availability, efficacy, and sexual side effects. Glutamatergic drugs, especially esketamine, gained attention (15.61% in English, 25.23% in Spanish), evoking emotions such as fear, sadness, and anger. Temporal analysis showed significant increases in discussions, with peaks in 2012 and 2021 for SSRIs in Spanish, and exponential growth from 2018 to 2021 for glutamatergic drugs. Emotional tones varied across languages, reflecting cultural differences.
Conclusions: Social media platforms like X provide valuable insights into public perceptions of antidepressants, highlighting cultural variations in attitudes. Understanding these perceptions can help clinicians address concerns and misconceptions, fostering informed treatment decisions. The limitations of social media data call for careful interpretation, emphasizing the need for continued research to improve pharmacovigilance and public health strategies.
{"title":"Understanding social media discourse on antidepressants: unsupervised and sentiment analysis using X.","authors":"Juan Pablo Chart-Pascual, Javier Goena, Francisco Lara, María Montero Torres, Julen Marin Napal, Rodrigo Muñoz, Cielo García Montero, Oscar Fraile Martínez, Miguel Ángel Ortega, Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Ana González Pinto, Javier Quintero, Melchor Alvarez-Mon, Miguel Ángel Álvarez-Mon","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antidepressants are essential in managing depression, including treatment-resistant cases. Public perceptions of these medications, shaped by social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter), can influence treatment adherence and outcomes. This study explores public attitudes toward antidepressants through sentiment and topic modeling analysis of tweets in English and Spanish from 2007 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tweets mentioning antidepressants approved for depression were collected. The analysis focused on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and glutamatergic drugs. Sentiment analysis and topic modeling were conducted to identify trends, concerns, and emotions in discussions across both languages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,448,674 tweets were analyzed (1,013,128 in English and 435,546 in Spanish). SSRIs were the most mentioned antidepressants (27.9% in English, 58.91% in Spanish). Pricing and availability were key concerns in English tweets, while Spanish tweets highlighted availability, efficacy, and sexual side effects. Glutamatergic drugs, especially esketamine, gained attention (15.61% in English, 25.23% in Spanish), evoking emotions such as fear, sadness, and anger. Temporal analysis showed significant increases in discussions, with peaks in 2012 and 2021 for SSRIs in Spanish, and exponential growth from 2018 to 2021 for glutamatergic drugs. Emotional tones varied across languages, reflecting cultural differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social media platforms like X provide valuable insights into public perceptions of antidepressants, highlighting cultural variations in attitudes. Understanding these perceptions can help clinicians address concerns and misconceptions, fostering informed treatment decisions. The limitations of social media data call for careful interpretation, emphasizing the need for continued research to improve pharmacovigilance and public health strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e51"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041734/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143556404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-05DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.28
Victor M Tang, Bernard Le Foll, Zafiris J Daskalakis, An-Li Wang, Leslie Buckley, Daniel M Blumberger, Daphne Voineskos
Background: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a devastating condition with frequent suicidality, contributing to overdose deaths. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is used to treat major depressive disorder (MDD) and is effective in treating suicidal ideation. We piloted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial of bilateral rTMS for patients with OUD and MDD experiencing suicidality.
Methods: Sequential bilateral TBS was delivered guided by structural neuroimaging: continuous TBS to the right then intermittent TBS to the left DLPFC, daily (20 treatments). The primary objective was to determine the feasibility of this population. The primary clinical outcome was the scale for suicidal ideation (SSI), secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms and opioid cue-induced craving. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04785456.
Results: Eighty-seven individuals were pre-screened. The most common reasons for ineligibility included being unreachable by the study team, difficulty with scheduling/travel requirements, and medical/psychiatric instability. Six participants (5:1 M:F) were enrolled (3/arm), four had a fentanyl use history; two completed per protocol (1/arm). Of the participants with follow-up data, SSI scores decreased in 2/3 in the sham arm and 2/2 in the active arm; depression and opioid craving scores decreased in all participants.
Conclusion: We present the first data piloting a structural neuroimaging-guided, multi-session rTMS treatment course in outpatients with suicidality and OUD in the current North American context. Recruitment and retention were the main challenges given the highly unstable medical and psychosocial context of this patient population. Future trials should consider a suitable environment to improve the feasibility of delivering this treatment.
{"title":"Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of suicidality in opioid use disorder: a pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Victor M Tang, Bernard Le Foll, Zafiris J Daskalakis, An-Li Wang, Leslie Buckley, Daniel M Blumberger, Daphne Voineskos","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.28","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.28","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a devastating condition with frequent suicidality, contributing to overdose deaths. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is used to treat major depressive disorder (MDD) and is effective in treating suicidal ideation. We piloted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial of bilateral rTMS for patients with OUD and MDD experiencing suicidality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sequential bilateral TBS was delivered guided by structural neuroimaging: continuous TBS to the right then intermittent TBS to the left DLPFC, daily (20 treatments). The primary objective was to determine the feasibility of this population. The primary clinical outcome was the scale for suicidal ideation (SSI), secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms and opioid cue-induced craving. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04785456.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven individuals were pre-screened. The most common reasons for ineligibility included being unreachable by the study team, difficulty with scheduling/travel requirements, and medical/psychiatric instability. Six participants (5:1 M:F) were enrolled (3/arm), four had a fentanyl use history; two completed per protocol (1/arm). Of the participants with follow-up data, SSI scores decreased in 2/3 in the sham arm and 2/2 in the active arm; depression and opioid craving scores decreased in all participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present the first data piloting a structural neuroimaging-guided, multi-session rTMS treatment course in outpatients with suicidality and OUD in the current North American context. Recruitment and retention were the main challenges given the highly unstable medical and psychosocial context of this patient population. Future trials should consider a suitable environment to improve the feasibility of delivering this treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e63"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188329/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143556402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-05DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.27
Maria Serra-Navarro, Derek Clougher, Vincenzo Oliva, Clàudia Valenzuela-Pascual, Michele De Prisco, María Florencia Forte, Marina Garriga, Brisa Solé, Jose Sánchez-Moreno, Norma Verdolini, Giulia Menculini, Alfonso Tortorella, Miquel Bernardo, J Antoni Ramos-Quiroga, Anabel Martinez-Aran, Eduard Vieta, Silvia Amoretti, Carla Torrent
Introduction: Impairment in both psychosocial functioning and neurocognition (NC) performance is present in bipolar disorder (BD) yet the role of sex differences in these deficits remains unclear. The present systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether males and females with BD demonstrate differences in psychosocial functioning and NC performance.
Methods: The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception until November 20, 2023.
Results: Twenty studies published between 2005 and 2023 with a total sample size of 2286 patients with BD were included. A random effects meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant result with a small effect (SMD = 0.313) for sex differences in verbal learning and memory as well as visual learning and memory (SMD = 0.263). Females outperformed males in both domains. No significant sex differences were observed for any other NC outcome or psychosocial functioning. High heterogeneity and differences in assessment scales used should be considered when interpreting these findings, given their potential impact on results.
Conclusions: Future research should adopt a more homogenous, standardized approach using longitudinal designs to gain a clearer insight into sex differences in this population. This approach so may increase the use of preventative therapeutic options to address the difficult clinical challenge of reaching cognitive and functional recovery.
{"title":"Sex differences in psychosocial functioning and neurocognition in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Maria Serra-Navarro, Derek Clougher, Vincenzo Oliva, Clàudia Valenzuela-Pascual, Michele De Prisco, María Florencia Forte, Marina Garriga, Brisa Solé, Jose Sánchez-Moreno, Norma Verdolini, Giulia Menculini, Alfonso Tortorella, Miquel Bernardo, J Antoni Ramos-Quiroga, Anabel Martinez-Aran, Eduard Vieta, Silvia Amoretti, Carla Torrent","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.27","DOIUrl":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.27","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Impairment in both psychosocial functioning and neurocognition (NC) performance is present in bipolar disorder (BD) yet the role of sex differences in these deficits remains unclear. The present systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether males and females with BD demonstrate differences in psychosocial functioning and NC performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception until November 20, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies published between 2005 and 2023 with a total sample size of 2286 patients with BD were included. A random effects meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant result with a small effect (SMD = 0.313) for sex differences in verbal learning and memory as well as visual learning and memory (SMD = 0.263). Females outperformed males in both domains. No significant sex differences were observed for any other NC outcome or psychosocial functioning. High heterogeneity and differences in assessment scales used should be considered when interpreting these findings, given their potential impact on results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future research should adopt a more homogenous, standardized approach using longitudinal designs to gain a clearer insight into sex differences in this population. This approach so may increase the use of preventative therapeutic options to address the difficult clinical challenge of reaching cognitive and functional recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e45"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041736/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143556403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}