Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-06-10DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2025.2515061
Amir Hadanny, Shai Efrati
Introduction: Persistent post-concussion syndrome (PCS) following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) represents a growing global health challenge that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Despite advances in acute concussion management, there remains a critical need for effective, evidence-based treatments for chronic PCS, as current interventions show limited success in addressing both symptoms and underlying pathophysiology.
Areas covered: In this review, the authors examine recent advances in PCS pathophysiology, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic interventions. The authors evaluate epidemiological trends, advanced neuroimaging findings, validated biomarkers, and emerging treatment modalities such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy, neuromodulation techniques, and biomarker-guided therapeutic approaches.
Expert opinion: Integration of recent evidence suggests a paradigm shift toward personalized, multimodal treatment approaches for PCS, combining targeted physiological interventions with symptom-specific therapies. Future management strategies should focus on early identification of at-risk patients and implementation of evidence-based treatment protocols that address both neurobiological and psychological aspects of recovery.
{"title":"Persistent post-concussion syndrome: pathophysiology, diagnosis, current and evolving treatment strategies.","authors":"Amir Hadanny, Shai Efrati","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2515061","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2515061","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Persistent post-concussion syndrome (PCS) following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) represents a growing global health challenge that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Despite advances in acute concussion management, there remains a critical need for effective, evidence-based treatments for chronic PCS, as current interventions show limited success in addressing both symptoms and underlying pathophysiology.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this review, the authors examine recent advances in PCS pathophysiology, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic interventions. The authors evaluate epidemiological trends, advanced neuroimaging findings, validated biomarkers, and emerging treatment modalities such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy, neuromodulation techniques, and biomarker-guided therapeutic approaches.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Integration of recent evidence suggests a paradigm shift toward personalized, multimodal treatment approaches for PCS, combining targeted physiological interventions with symptom-specific therapies. Future management strategies should focus on early identification of at-risk patients and implementation of evidence-based treatment protocols that address both neurobiological and psychological aspects of recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"959-971"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144247198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-05-15DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2025.2506462
Kevin Bigaut, Judicaelle Didierjean, Jerome de Seze
Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disorder driven by both inflammatory and neurodegenerative processes. While disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have significantly improved prognosis, robust treatment switching criteria remain essential to balance efficacy and safety over the disease course.
Areas covered: This review examines historical and current criteria for escalating DMTs from moderate- to high-efficacy therapies (HET). The authors summarize emerging clinical, imaging, and biological markers that inform decision-making and explore strategies for de-escalation, including DMT discontinuation and innovative approaches such as exit and bridge therapies.
Expert opinion: Recent advances in MS management emphasize earlier initiation of HET and more stringent switching criteria. Although innovative monitoring tools - including clinical evaluations, imaging, biological markers, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) - enhance disease assessment, they require further validation, standardization, and broader accessibility. Similarly, de-escalation criteria need additional research to optimize patient selection.
{"title":"An update on the evaluation of treatment switching criteria in multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Kevin Bigaut, Judicaelle Didierjean, Jerome de Seze","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2506462","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2506462","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disorder driven by both inflammatory and neurodegenerative processes. While disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have significantly improved prognosis, robust treatment switching criteria remain essential to balance efficacy and safety over the disease course.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines historical and current criteria for escalating DMTs from moderate- to high-efficacy therapies (HET). The authors summarize emerging clinical, imaging, and biological markers that inform decision-making and explore strategies for de-escalation, including DMT discontinuation and innovative approaches such as exit and bridge therapies.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Recent advances in MS management emphasize earlier initiation of HET and more stringent switching criteria. Although innovative monitoring tools - including clinical evaluations, imaging, biological markers, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) - enhance disease assessment, they require further validation, standardization, and broader accessibility. Similarly, de-escalation criteria need additional research to optimize patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"911-928"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143960307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-06-29DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2025.2515068
Ravi Rajmohan, April Wen, Claire Henchcliffe
Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease leading to motor and non-motor disabilities. Broadly accessible fluid- or tissue-based biomarkers will complement neuroimaging and may allow earlier identification and more precise tracking.
Areas covered: The authors have reviewed the recent advances from original full-text English-language articles that were indexed in the PubMed database between June 2023 and June 2024. Articles were identified using the PubMed MESH terms 'Parkinson's Disease' AND 'biomarkers' that focused on using a fluid or tissue-based biomarker to distinguish participants with PD from healthy controls or other conditions. The most promising new biomarkers are those measuring α-synuclein from cerebrospinal fluid or skin biopsy. A significant limitation of these studies is their reliance on a clinical diagnosis of PD, mostly without neuropathological confirmation.
Expert opinion: Mounting evidence supports the validity of CSF and skin biopsy-based detection of α-synuclein for the distinction of PD from healthy controls, although not yet from the spectrum of α-synucleinopathies nor from non-α-synuclein forms of parkinsonism. Nonetheless, the potential to detect individuals who will develop PD may revolutionize our ability to test potential preventive interventions before motor symptoms develop. Machine-learning approaches offer promising strategies for efficient identification and validation of novel biomarkers.
{"title":"Recent advances in fluid and tissue-based biomarkers for use in Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Ravi Rajmohan, April Wen, Claire Henchcliffe","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2515068","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2515068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease leading to motor and non-motor disabilities. Broadly accessible fluid- or tissue-based biomarkers will complement neuroimaging and may allow earlier identification and more precise tracking.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The authors have reviewed the recent advances from original full-text English-language articles that were indexed in the PubMed database between June 2023 and June 2024. Articles were identified using the PubMed MESH terms 'Parkinson's Disease' AND 'biomarkers' that focused on using a fluid or tissue-based biomarker to distinguish participants with PD from healthy controls or other conditions. The most promising new biomarkers are those measuring α-synuclein from cerebrospinal fluid or skin biopsy. A significant limitation of these studies is their reliance on a clinical diagnosis of PD, mostly without neuropathological confirmation.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Mounting evidence supports the validity of CSF and skin biopsy-based detection of α-synuclein for the distinction of PD from healthy controls, although not yet from the spectrum of α-synucleinopathies nor from non-α-synuclein forms of parkinsonism. Nonetheless, the potential to detect individuals who will develop PD may revolutionize our ability to test potential preventive interventions before motor symptoms develop. Machine-learning approaches offer promising strategies for efficient identification and validation of novel biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"951-958"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144198561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-06-29DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2025.2524102
Jamil H Muradov, Hannah Reid, Ellen Parker, Jackie Phinney, David B Clarke, Alon Friedman, Mark A MacLean
Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of long-term disability. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) signaling constitutes an important target for pharmacological treatment options.
Methods: The authors have systematically reviewed primary clinical literature reporting on FDA-approved NMDAR antagonist treatment in TBI, based on a set of pre-defined eligibility criteria. Risk of bias assessment was performed using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) recommendations. Patient characteristics, treatment conditions, and outcomes were reported according to PRISMA guidelines.
Results: This review of five clinical literature databases identified 32 eligible studies. Of 1,827 included patients, the majority (74.8%) experienced severe TBI (weighted mean baseline GCS 6.35). Amantadine (24 studies) variably influenced functional recovery and was linked to adverse effects. Ketamine (five studies) variably lowered intracranial pressure and suppressed spreading depolarization. Memantine and dextromethorphan (2 and 1 studies, respectively) showed favorable safety profiles, though data were limited. Across controlled studies, there was a 0.46 (95% CI: 0.16-0.76) weighted mean difference between control and intervention, favoring NMDAR antagonist treatment.
Conclusions: Future trials should incorporate mechanism-driven biomarkers and must expand research on safe, well-tolerated drugs to improve efficacy and mitigate adverse effects.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024539051.
外伤性脑损伤(TBI)是导致长期残疾的主要原因。n -甲基- d -天冬氨酸受体(NMDAR)信号是药物治疗选择的重要靶点。方法:作者基于一套预先定义的资格标准,系统地回顾了fda批准的NMDAR拮抗剂治疗TBI的主要临床文献。偏倚风险评估采用苏格兰校际指南网络(SIGN)建议。根据PRISMA指南报告患者特征、治疗条件和结果。结果:本综述从5个临床文献数据库中筛选出32项符合条件的研究。在纳入的1827例患者中,大多数(74.8%)经历了严重的TBI(加权平均基线GCS为6.35)。金刚烷胺(24项研究)不同程度地影响功能恢复,并与不良反应有关。氯胺酮(5项研究)不同程度地降低了颅内压并抑制了去极化扩散。美金刚和右美沙芬(分别有2项和1项研究)显示出良好的安全性,尽管数据有限。在对照研究中,对照组和干预之间的加权平均差异为0.46 (95% CI: 0.16-0.76),有利于NMDAR拮抗剂治疗。结论:未来的试验应纳入机制驱动的生物标志物,并必须扩大对安全、耐受性良好的药物的研究,以提高疗效并减轻不良反应。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024539051。
{"title":"N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor antagonist treatment in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of the clinical studies.","authors":"Jamil H Muradov, Hannah Reid, Ellen Parker, Jackie Phinney, David B Clarke, Alon Friedman, Mark A MacLean","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2524102","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2524102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of long-term disability. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) signaling constitutes an important target for pharmacological treatment options.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors have systematically reviewed primary clinical literature reporting on FDA-approved NMDAR antagonist treatment in TBI, based on a set of pre-defined eligibility criteria. Risk of bias assessment was performed using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) recommendations. Patient characteristics, treatment conditions, and outcomes were reported according to PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review of five clinical literature databases identified 32 eligible studies. Of 1,827 included patients, the majority (74.8%) experienced severe TBI (weighted mean baseline GCS 6.35). Amantadine (24 studies) variably influenced functional recovery and was linked to adverse effects. Ketamine (five studies) variably lowered intracranial pressure and suppressed spreading depolarization. Memantine and dextromethorphan (2 and 1 studies, respectively) showed favorable safety profiles, though data were limited. Across controlled studies, there was a 0.46 (95% CI: 0.16-0.76) weighted mean difference between control and intervention, favoring NMDAR antagonist treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future trials should incorporate mechanism-driven biomarkers and must expand research on safe, well-tolerated drugs to improve efficacy and mitigate adverse effects.<b>PROSPERO registration number</b>: CRD42024539051.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"991-1006"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144527034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-06-13DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2025.2516097
Don L Goldenberg
Introduction: Long COVID is a condition characterized by persistent unexplained symptoms following COVID-19 infection. These symptoms are not related to another disease or organ damage and are similar to those in fibromyalgia and myslgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).
Areas covered: The similar clinical and pathophysiological features and management of long COVID, fibromyalgia and ME/CFS are explored from the unifying framework of central sensitivity syndromes. The article is based on a literature search utilizing PubMed for content published between 2021 and 1 May 2025, using search terms: long COVID, long COVID syndrome, post-COVID-19, post-acute SARS-CoV-2, fibromyalgia, ME/CFS, post-exertional malaise and central sensitization.
Expert opinion: Once long COVID is redefined to exclude patients with well-defined organ disease, it fits best as a model of central sensitization. Long COVID is a single syndrome, rather than many distinct diseases. Optimal management of long COVID and similar central sensitivity syndromes should include personalized care with a primary care led-multidisciplinary team.
{"title":"The pivotal role of central sensitization in long COVID, fibromyalgia and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.","authors":"Don L Goldenberg","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2516097","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2516097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long COVID is a condition characterized by persistent unexplained symptoms following COVID-19 infection. These symptoms are not related to another disease or organ damage and are similar to those in fibromyalgia and myslgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The similar clinical and pathophysiological features and management of long COVID, fibromyalgia and ME/CFS are explored from the unifying framework of central sensitivity syndromes. The article is based on a literature search utilizing PubMed for content published between 2021 and 1 May 2025, using search terms: long COVID, long COVID syndrome, post-COVID-19, post-acute SARS-CoV-2, fibromyalgia, ME/CFS, post-exertional malaise and central sensitization.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Once long COVID is redefined to exclude patients with well-defined organ disease, it fits best as a model of central sensitization. Long COVID is a single syndrome, rather than many distinct diseases. Optimal management of long COVID and similar central sensitivity syndromes should include personalized care with a primary care led-multidisciplinary team.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"973-989"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144283092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Familial Dysautonomia (FD) is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disease caused by a single point mutation in the ELP1 gene, leading to a deficiency in the Elongator Protein 1. Management has traditionally focused on symptomatic supportive care and prevention of complications. However, promising disease-modifying treatments are now being developed to correct the underlying splicing defect in ELP1.
Areas covered: The authors searched PubMed, GoogleScholar, and clinicaltrials.gov for all types of studies regarding the genetic basis of FD and recent advances in the development of disease-modifying therapies, including publications available through November 2025.
Expert opinion: Experimental evidence indicates that boosting ELP1 protein levels could halt disease progression. Several small molecules and genetic therapies have shown the ability to enhance wild-type ELP1 mRNA and protein expression in animal models. An ongoing N-of-1 clinical trial is evaluating the intrathecal administration of an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) designed to correct the splicing defect in an individual with FD. Combining small molecules, such as optimized potent oral kinetin derivatives, with intrathecal antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and intravitreal gene therapy using viral vectors presents a synergistic therapeutic approach to elevate ELP1 levels. Assessing the efficacy and safety of these targeted strategies will require innovative, well-designed clinical trials.
{"title":"Advances in the treatment of familial dysautonomia: what does the future hold?","authors":"Margarita Grobocopatel Marra, Mechteld Kuijpers, Horacio Kaufmann, Alejandra Gonzalez-Duarte","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2525400","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2525400","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Familial Dysautonomia (FD) is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disease caused by a single point mutation in the <i>ELP1</i> gene, leading to a deficiency in the Elongator Protein 1. Management has traditionally focused on symptomatic supportive care and prevention of complications. However, promising disease-modifying treatments are now being developed to correct the underlying splicing defect in <i>ELP1</i>.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The authors searched PubMed, GoogleScholar, and clinicaltrials.gov for all types of studies regarding the genetic basis of FD and recent advances in the development of disease-modifying therapies, including publications available through November 2025.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Experimental evidence indicates that boosting ELP1 protein levels could halt disease progression. Several small molecules and genetic therapies have shown the ability to enhance wild-type ELP1 mRNA and protein expression in animal models. An ongoing N-of-1 clinical trial is evaluating the intrathecal administration of an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) designed to correct the splicing defect in an individual with FD. Combining small molecules, such as optimized potent oral kinetin derivatives, with intrathecal antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and intravitreal gene therapy using viral vectors presents a synergistic therapeutic approach to elevate ELP1 levels. Assessing the efficacy and safety of these targeted strategies will require innovative, well-designed clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"939-949"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144527033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-06-29DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2025.2524103
Yuming Hu, Xiaoyan Peng, Xuefeng Wang
Introduction: The prevention and treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) remains difficult. Rapid seizure termination and effective management of fatal complications are the keys to improving prognosis.
Areas covered: This review is based on the current literature related to SRSE published in the PubMed database from 2000-March 2025 using the keywords 'SRSE' and 'drug treatment.' The purpose of this article is to shed new light and perspective on the treatment of SRSE.
Expert opinion: SRSE treatment should first target the primary disease that causes SRSE. As the primary disease improves, the frequency of attacks gradually decreases. However, persistent epileptic seizures can cause brain damage and functional disorders, thereby altering the evolution of the primary disease. Therefore, the quick termination of epileptic seizures in patients and the proper management of fatal complications are important measures that can improve patient prognosis. Ketamine, a KD and combination therapy are the most common treatments. Although no consensus has been established, these treatments are generally successful. Neuromodulation, new antiepileptic drugs and surgery are also promising therapeutic areas. However, most reports include individual cases or case series, and thus these drugs and methods should be used with caution.
{"title":"Therapeutic approaches for super-refractory status epilepticus: an update of the literature.","authors":"Yuming Hu, Xiaoyan Peng, Xuefeng Wang","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2524103","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2524103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prevention and treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) remains difficult. Rapid seizure termination and effective management of fatal complications are the keys to improving prognosis.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review is based on the current literature related to SRSE published in the PubMed database from 2000-March 2025 using the keywords 'SRSE' and 'drug treatment.' The purpose of this article is to shed new light and perspective on the treatment of SRSE.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>SRSE treatment should first target the primary disease that causes SRSE. As the primary disease improves, the frequency of attacks gradually decreases. However, persistent epileptic seizures can cause brain damage and functional disorders, thereby altering the evolution of the primary disease. Therefore, the quick termination of epileptic seizures in patients and the proper management of fatal complications are important measures that can improve patient prognosis. Ketamine, a KD and combination therapy are the most common treatments. Although no consensus has been established, these treatments are generally successful. Neuromodulation, new antiepileptic drugs and surgery are also promising therapeutic areas. However, most reports include individual cases or case series, and thus these drugs and methods should be used with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"929-937"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144527035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-30DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2025.2508777
Nail Benallegue, Fabien Rollot, David-Axel Laplaud
Introduction: Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) differs from adult MS in its clinical characteristics and disease course. POMS exhibits a heightened inflammatory activity with higher relapse rates and lesion load, alongside less early physical disability but more pronounced cognitive impairment and impaired brain growth.
Areas covered: This review examines treatment strategy in POMS based on safety and efficacy data from observational studies and randomized controlled trials. This article is based on a literature search conducted using MEDLINE and Google Scholar for the period of 2000 to 2024.
Expert opinion: High-efficacy therapies, including fingolimod, natalizumab, and anti-CD20 therapies, have demonstrated superior disease control and disability prevention. Early initiation of HET is increasingly recommended to optimize outcomes and preserve quality of life.Low/moderate-efficacy therapies, such as interferons, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate should be reserved for patients with mild disease. While long-term safety data, personalized prognostic markers and de-escalation strategies are still needed, high-efficacy therapies provide a promising standard of care, especially given enhanced neuroinflammatory activity in POMS. Future research should prioritize strategies to balance disease control with adverse effects (AEs), accounting for aging and individual disease trajectories, to improve long-term quality of life in POMS patients.
{"title":"Optimizing treatment for pediatric multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Nail Benallegue, Fabien Rollot, David-Axel Laplaud","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2508777","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2508777","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) differs from adult MS in its clinical characteristics and disease course. POMS exhibits a heightened inflammatory activity with higher relapse rates and lesion load, alongside less early physical disability but more pronounced cognitive impairment and impaired brain growth.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines treatment strategy in POMS based on safety and efficacy data from observational studies and randomized controlled trials. This article is based on a literature search conducted using MEDLINE and Google Scholar for the period of 2000 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>High-efficacy therapies, including fingolimod, natalizumab, and anti-CD20 therapies, have demonstrated superior disease control and disability prevention. Early initiation of HET is increasingly recommended to optimize outcomes and preserve quality of life.Low/moderate-efficacy therapies, such as interferons, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate should be reserved for patients with mild disease. While long-term safety data, personalized prognostic markers and de-escalation strategies are still needed, high-efficacy therapies provide a promising standard of care, especially given enhanced neuroinflammatory activity in POMS. Future research should prioritize strategies to balance disease control with adverse effects (AEs), accounting for aging and individual disease trajectories, to improve long-term quality of life in POMS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"819-855"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144181952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-06-05DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2025.2510408
Andrew C Stanfield, Andrew G McKechanie
Introduction: Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is the most frequent inherited form of intellectual disability and a common cause of autism spectrum disorders and other neurodevelopmental conditions. It is commonly associated with hyperarousal, anxiety, and behavioral difficulties such as agitation, self-injurious behavior, and aggression.
Areas covered: This narrative review covers the physical, cognitive, and behavioral phenotype associated with FXS and the evidence for pharmacological interventions for behavioral difficulties, including those prescribed on the basis of symptoms and those aimed at the pathophysiological mechanisms of FXS ('targeted' interventions). Consideration is then given to the evidence for novel targeted treatments currently in later stages of clinical development.
Expert opinion: The first-line management of behavioral difficulties are non-pharmacological interventions, and there are only a few studies in FXS to guide pharmacological approaches. Identification and management of anxiety and ADHD, which contribute to behavioral difficulties, are important steps before considering antipsychotic treatment for agitation, aggression, or self-injurious behavior. The evidence for repurposed targeted treatments remains based on small RCTs or open-label studies; therapeutic trials of these interventions therefore need close monitoring. Multiple novel medications are in clinical development; genetic therapies remain preclinical but are likely to be important in the coming years.
{"title":"Behavioural difficulties in fragile X syndrome: current pharmacological options and potential future developments.","authors":"Andrew C Stanfield, Andrew G McKechanie","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2510408","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2510408","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is the most frequent inherited form of intellectual disability and a common cause of autism spectrum disorders and other neurodevelopmental conditions. It is commonly associated with hyperarousal, anxiety, and behavioral difficulties such as agitation, self-injurious behavior, and aggression.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This narrative review covers the physical, cognitive, and behavioral phenotype associated with FXS and the evidence for pharmacological interventions for behavioral difficulties, including those prescribed on the basis of symptoms and those aimed at the pathophysiological mechanisms of FXS ('targeted' interventions). Consideration is then given to the evidence for novel targeted treatments currently in later stages of clinical development.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The first-line management of behavioral difficulties are non-pharmacological interventions, and there are only a few studies in FXS to guide pharmacological approaches. Identification and management of anxiety and ADHD, which contribute to behavioral difficulties, are important steps before considering antipsychotic treatment for agitation, aggression, or self-injurious behavior. The evidence for repurposed targeted treatments remains based on small RCTs or open-label studies; therapeutic trials of these interventions therefore need close monitoring. Multiple novel medications are in clinical development; genetic therapies remain preclinical but are likely to be important in the coming years.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"857-867"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144215379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-14DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2025.2506463
Stefania Chiappini, Gaia Sampogna, Antonio Ventriglio, Giulia Menculini, Valerio Ricci, Mauro Pettorruso, Umberto Volpe, Giovanni Martinotti
{"title":"Clinical Insights and Strategies to Managing Depression Subtypes Associated with Tobacco dependence: A Response to the Letter to the Editor.","authors":"Stefania Chiappini, Gaia Sampogna, Antonio Ventriglio, Giulia Menculini, Valerio Ricci, Mauro Pettorruso, Umberto Volpe, Giovanni Martinotti","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2506463","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2506463","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"883-884"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143993061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}