Aaron L Zebolsky, Nina Gallo, Travis Clarke, Jeffery A May, Raj D Dedhia, Anas Eid
A retrospective case-control study was performed to characterize the rate of missed follow-up appointments after facial trauma and identify associated risk factors.Follow-up appointments for facial trauma over a 3-month period at a single, safety net hospital were analyzed. Appointment-specific, sociodemographic, trauma, and management data were compared between cases (missed appointments) and controls (attended appointments). Univariate testing and multivariable logistic regression were employed.A total of 116 cases and 259 controls were identified, yielding a missed appointment rate of 30.9% (116/375). Missed appointments were significantly associated with initial clinic appointments compared to return visits (odds ratio [OR] 2.21 [1.38-3.54]), afternoon visits compared to morning (OR 3.14 [1.94-5.07]), lack of private health insurance (OR 2.91 [1.68-5.18]), and presence of midface fractures (OR 2.04 [1.28-3.27]). Missed appointments were negatively associated with mandible fractures (OR 0.56 [0.35-0.89]), surgical management (OR 0.48 [0.30-0.77]), and the presence of nonremovable hardware (OR 0.39 [0.23-0.64]). Upon multivariable logistic regression, missed appointments remained independently associated with afternoon visits (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.95 [1.12-3.4]), lack of private health insurance (aOR 2.73 [1.55-4.8]), and midface fractures (aOR 2.09 [1.21-3.59]).Nearly one-third of facial trauma patients missed follow-up appointments, with the greatest risk among those with afternoon appointments, lacking private health insurance, and with midface fractures.
{"title":"Risk Factors for Missed Follow-up Appointments among Facial Trauma Patients.","authors":"Aaron L Zebolsky, Nina Gallo, Travis Clarke, Jeffery A May, Raj D Dedhia, Anas Eid","doi":"10.1055/a-2325-5425","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2325-5425","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A retrospective case-control study was performed to characterize the rate of missed follow-up appointments after facial trauma and identify associated risk factors.Follow-up appointments for facial trauma over a 3-month period at a single, safety net hospital were analyzed. Appointment-specific, sociodemographic, trauma, and management data were compared between cases (missed appointments) and controls (attended appointments). Univariate testing and multivariable logistic regression were employed.A total of 116 cases and 259 controls were identified, yielding a missed appointment rate of 30.9% (116/375). Missed appointments were significantly associated with initial clinic appointments compared to return visits (odds ratio [OR] 2.21 [1.38-3.54]), afternoon visits compared to morning (OR 3.14 [1.94-5.07]), lack of private health insurance (OR 2.91 [1.68-5.18]), and presence of midface fractures (OR 2.04 [1.28-3.27]). Missed appointments were negatively associated with mandible fractures (OR 0.56 [0.35-0.89]), surgical management (OR 0.48 [0.30-0.77]), and the presence of nonremovable hardware (OR 0.39 [0.23-0.64]). Upon multivariable logistic regression, missed appointments remained independently associated with afternoon visits (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.95 [1.12-3.4]), lack of private health insurance (aOR 2.73 [1.55-4.8]), and midface fractures (aOR 2.09 [1.21-3.59]).Nearly one-third of facial trauma patients missed follow-up appointments, with the greatest risk among those with afternoon appointments, lacking private health insurance, and with midface fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140921816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A normal alar-columellar relationship is crucial for lower third finesse in rhinoplasty. Hanging columella is a common complaint in the alar-columellar relationship and membranous septum excision is frequently recommended for its correction. This paper focuses on the role of the membranous septum in achieving a normal alar-columellar relationship. It was aimed to present an algorithm that could be used for aberrancies in the alar-columellar relationship.Ninety-seven patients who underwent closed-approach rhinoplasty between January and December 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Routine tip plasty maneuvers were performed on all patients. Membrane septum excision was not performed in any of the cases. Standardized preoperative and postoperative 12-month lateral view photographs were scanned for hanging or retracted columella.Hanging columella was observed in seven patients preoperatively (n = 97). No hanging or retracted columella was observed postoperatively.Hanging columella can be successfully corrected with alternative surgical maneuvers without excision of the membranous septum in closed-approach rhinoplasty in appropriate cases. Complete preservation of the membranous septum does not cause hanging columella in the postoperative period.
{"title":"Role of Membranous Septum in the Alar-Columellar Relationship: Strategies in Closed-Approach Rhinoplasty.","authors":"Ayhan Işık Erdal, Bilge Kaan İsmail, Serhat Şibar","doi":"10.1055/a-2338-0701","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2338-0701","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A normal alar-columellar relationship is crucial for lower third finesse in rhinoplasty. Hanging columella is a common complaint in the alar-columellar relationship and membranous septum excision is frequently recommended for its correction. This paper focuses on the role of the membranous septum in achieving a normal alar-columellar relationship. It was aimed to present an algorithm that could be used for aberrancies in the alar-columellar relationship.Ninety-seven patients who underwent closed-approach rhinoplasty between January and December 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Routine tip plasty maneuvers were performed on all patients. Membrane septum excision was not performed in any of the cases. Standardized preoperative and postoperative 12-month lateral view photographs were scanned for hanging or retracted columella.Hanging columella was observed in seven patients preoperatively (<i>n</i> = 97). No hanging or retracted columella was observed postoperatively.Hanging columella can be successfully corrected with alternative surgical maneuvers without excision of the membranous septum in closed-approach rhinoplasty in appropriate cases. Complete preservation of the membranous septum does not cause hanging columella in the postoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141247681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marcin Jadczak, Sandra Krzywdzińska, Dariusz Jurkiewicz
A key component of a well-performed rhinoplasty is to obtain the proper, aesthetic shape of the nasal tip. Various surgical techniques have been developed to achieve this effect. In this work, the author wanted to focus not only on the satisfactory shape of the nose, but above all on its main role-functionality. In this article, the asymmetrical lateral crus steal (ALCS) technique is proposed, which in its assumption will enable narrowing, better defining and rotating of the nasal tip, and at the same time enhancing nasal patency. We present a retrospective analysis within the group of 267 patients who underwent primary open-approach rhinoplasty that included the ALCS technique. The mean follow-up time was 12 months. A total of 232 patients achieved very good postoperative results without observation of any serious complications related to breathing difficulties or asymmetry of the nasal tip shape. ALCS is a relatively simple surgical technique to perform. The use of the ALCS suture creates the possibility of proper profiling of the nasal tip while improving the respiratory functions of the nose.
{"title":"Asymmetrical Lateral Crus Steal in Geometric Tip Reshaping.","authors":"Marcin Jadczak, Sandra Krzywdzińska, Dariusz Jurkiewicz","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787723","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787723","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A key component of a well-performed rhinoplasty is to obtain the proper, aesthetic shape of the nasal tip. Various surgical techniques have been developed to achieve this effect. In this work, the author wanted to focus not only on the satisfactory shape of the nose, but above all on its main role-functionality. In this article, the asymmetrical lateral crus steal (ALCS) technique is proposed, which in its assumption will enable narrowing, better defining and rotating of the nasal tip, and at the same time enhancing nasal patency. We present a retrospective analysis within the group of 267 patients who underwent primary open-approach rhinoplasty that included the ALCS technique. The mean follow-up time was 12 months. A total of 232 patients achieved very good postoperative results without observation of any serious complications related to breathing difficulties or asymmetry of the nasal tip shape. ALCS is a relatively simple surgical technique to perform. The use of the ALCS suture creates the possibility of proper profiling of the nasal tip while improving the respiratory functions of the nose.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141418498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
One of the most common components of most dorsal preservation (DP) techniques is subdorsal septal excision. Whatever the instrument used for this procedure (piezoelectric, Rongeur, or long scissors), it is paramount to be able to determine the exact subdorsal point (SDoP) at which the osteotomy/ostectomy (or cartilage cut) has been reached. First, to avoid any unnecessary extension of the osteotomy that increases the risk of fracture spreading into the cribriform plate and a consequent cerebrospinal fluid leak; second, to be sure that the subdorsal cut is high enough and can be combined/unified with the planned radix osteotomy.In addition, transverse osteotomies are usually necessary in both preservation and structural rhinoplasties. Even though many surgeons are satisfied with their osteotomy lines, it sometimes proves difficult to be sure of their position, especially during a DP rhinoplasty when both the transverse lines have to go in the direction of the planned radix osteotomy.We have developed the Nasal Locator (NL) to precisely define various nasal points of interest, such as a subdorsal cut (cartilaginous or bony), or a transverse or medial osteotomy line. It ends in two tips. The lower tip is placed at the point we wish to determine (e.g., SDoP or a transverse osteotomy), while the upper tip is fixed a certain distance from it (in all three dimensions), showing its exact location.Our in-depth research of the literature and the market has not revealed any device similar in form and function to the NL.We have been using the NL for almost 2 years and are confident of its usefulness. It is easy to use, and practically no time is needed to become familiar with it. During surgery, it is needed for less than 30 seconds and is risk-free. It is fully sterilizable and can be used repeatedly.
{"title":"The Nasal Locator: An Innovative Instrument to Define the Exact Point of Osteotomy in Preservation or Structural Rhinoplasty.","authors":"George Mireas","doi":"10.1055/a-2330-3837","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2330-3837","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the most common components of most dorsal preservation (DP) techniques is subdorsal septal excision. Whatever the instrument used for this procedure (piezoelectric, Rongeur, or long scissors), it is paramount to be able to determine the exact subdorsal point (SDoP) at which the osteotomy/ostectomy (or cartilage cut) has been reached. First, to avoid any unnecessary extension of the osteotomy that increases the risk of fracture spreading into the cribriform plate and a consequent cerebrospinal fluid leak; second, to be sure that the subdorsal cut is high enough and can be combined/unified with the planned radix osteotomy.In addition, transverse osteotomies are usually necessary in both preservation and structural rhinoplasties. Even though many surgeons are satisfied with their osteotomy lines, it sometimes proves difficult to be sure of their position, especially during a DP rhinoplasty when both the transverse lines have to go in the direction of the planned radix osteotomy.We have developed the Nasal Locator (NL) to precisely define various nasal points of interest, such as a subdorsal cut (cartilaginous or bony), or a transverse or medial osteotomy line. It ends in two tips. The lower tip is placed at the point we wish to determine (e.g., SDoP or a transverse osteotomy), while the upper tip is fixed a certain distance from it (in all three dimensions), showing its exact location.Our in-depth research of the literature and the market has not revealed any device similar in form and function to the NL.We have been using the NL for almost 2 years and are confident of its usefulness. It is easy to use, and practically no time is needed to become familiar with it. During surgery, it is needed for less than 30 seconds and is risk-free. It is fully sterilizable and can be used repeatedly.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141075900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emre Ilhan, Diego Arancibia-Tagle, Hüseyin Özay, Jose Carlos Neves
The development of power instruments has led to great advances in rhinoplasty. It has helped to reduce operating time, minimize damage to the surrounding soft tissues, and allow precision bony modification compared with the use of manual rasps. Burrs help ensure precise results by (i) creating a smooth transition between the lateral nasal sidewall and the face, (ii) treating bony asymmetries, and (iii) producing homogeneous upper and middle thirds that softy translate into the upper lateral cartilages. The aim of this paper is to show applications of cylindrical burrs in rhinoplasty surgery to treat the dorsal upper and middle thirds as well as lateral sidewalls of the nose, regardless of whether the dorsal preservation or structure technique is used. This approach offers a safe, fast, and precise technique that can be used in conjunction with piezo osteotomy to obtain the optimal outcomes.
{"title":"Precision Rhinoplasty Cylindric Burrs-Sidewall Aesthetics.","authors":"Emre Ilhan, Diego Arancibia-Tagle, Hüseyin Özay, Jose Carlos Neves","doi":"10.1055/a-2318-1121","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2318-1121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of power instruments has led to great advances in rhinoplasty. It has helped to reduce operating time, minimize damage to the surrounding soft tissues, and allow precision bony modification compared with the use of manual rasps. Burrs help ensure precise results by (i) creating a smooth transition between the lateral nasal sidewall and the face, (ii) treating bony asymmetries, and (iii) producing homogeneous upper and middle thirds that softy translate into the upper lateral cartilages. The aim of this paper is to show applications of cylindrical burrs in rhinoplasty surgery to treat the dorsal upper and middle thirds as well as lateral sidewalls of the nose, regardless of whether the dorsal preservation or structure technique is used. This approach offers a safe, fast, and precise technique that can be used in conjunction with piezo osteotomy to obtain the optimal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-08-25DOI: 10.1055/a-2160-4998
Monica K Rossi Meyer, Sam P Most
Nasal obstruction is an exceedingly common problem and challenging to treat due to its multifactorial etiology. Therefore, measuring treatment outcomes of nasal obstruction can be equally complex yet vital to appropriately assessing symptom improvement or resolution. Both physiologic and anatomic assessments of the nasal airway exist in addition to validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which objectify subjective nasal obstruction and sinonasal symptoms. Correlation between objective and subjective treatment outcome measures is controversial with clinical guidelines favoring the use of PROMs for surgical treatment of nasal obstruction. In this review, the anatomic and physiologic measurements of the nasal airway and validated PROMs will be discussed, as well as the rationale for implementing PROMs into the rhinoplasty surgeon's practice.
{"title":"Quantifying the Subjective Experience of Nasal Obstruction: A Review.","authors":"Monica K Rossi Meyer, Sam P Most","doi":"10.1055/a-2160-4998","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2160-4998","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nasal obstruction is an exceedingly common problem and challenging to treat due to its multifactorial etiology. Therefore, measuring treatment outcomes of nasal obstruction can be equally complex yet vital to appropriately assessing symptom improvement or resolution. Both physiologic and anatomic assessments of the nasal airway exist in addition to validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which objectify subjective nasal obstruction and sinonasal symptoms. Correlation between objective and subjective treatment outcome measures is controversial with clinical guidelines favoring the use of PROMs for surgical treatment of nasal obstruction. In this review, the anatomic and physiologic measurements of the nasal airway and validated PROMs will be discussed, as well as the rationale for implementing PROMs into the rhinoplasty surgeon's practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"336-340"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10074148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-01-15DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778072
Zachary T Root, Aspen R Schneller, Thomas J Lepley, Zhenxing Wu, Kai Zhao
This article is an examination of computational fluid dynamics in the field of otolaryngology, specifically rhinology. The historical development and subsequent application of computational fluid dynamics continues to enhance our understanding of various sinonasal conditions and surgical planning in the field today. This article aims to provide a description of computational fluid dynamics, the methods for its application, and the clinical relevance of its results. Consideration of recent research and data in computational fluid dynamics demonstrates its use in nonhistological disease pathology exploration, accompanied by a large potential for surgical guidance applications. Additionally, this article defines in lay terms the variables analyzed in the computational fluid dynamic process, including velocity, wall shear stress, area, resistance, and heat flux.
{"title":"Computational Fluid Dynamics and Its Potential Applications for the ENT Clinician.","authors":"Zachary T Root, Aspen R Schneller, Thomas J Lepley, Zhenxing Wu, Kai Zhao","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1778072","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1778072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article is an examination of computational fluid dynamics in the field of otolaryngology, specifically rhinology. The historical development and subsequent application of computational fluid dynamics continues to enhance our understanding of various sinonasal conditions and surgical planning in the field today. This article aims to provide a description of computational fluid dynamics, the methods for its application, and the clinical relevance of its results. Consideration of recent research and data in computational fluid dynamics demonstrates its use in nonhistological disease pathology exploration, accompanied by a large potential for surgical guidance applications. Additionally, this article defines in lay terms the variables analyzed in the computational fluid dynamic process, including velocity, wall shear stress, area, resistance, and heat flux.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"323-330"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139471449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-11-28DOI: 10.1055/a-2218-7297
Giancarlo Ottaviano
Nasal obstruction is one of the main symptoms of different nasal pathologies. Many physiological and pathological conditions can produce nasal airflow impairment causing nasal obstruction and affecting patients' quality of life. There are different methods for the measurement of nasal obstruction, but in clinical practice the most common used are acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and peak nasal inspiratory flow. This review describes the fundamentals of acoustic rhinometry, its normal values, the different physiological and pathological conditions that can modify nasal patency, and the utility of this instrument for the measurement of nasal obstruction in clinical practice. Acoustic rhinometry is a simple test, so it is suitable for measurements in the pediatric population, i.e., for evaluating adenoid hypertrophy. Acoustic rhinometry normal values are available, unilaterally and bilaterally for pediatric and adult populations. Acoustic rhinometry has been demonstrated to be reproducible and even superior to rhinomanometry when measuring nasal modifications during challenges. It is possible to use acoustic rhinometry before and after nasal surgery. Measuring nasal cavities volume and cross-sectional area, acoustic rhinometry is particularly indicated in rhinosurgery, especially for the evaluation of spreader grafts. Brief considerations about the correlation between nasal symptoms, in particular the subjective sensation of nasal obstruction, and the acoustic rhinometry results as well as the correlation of acoustic rhinometry with other methods for the measurement of nasal obstruction are also reported. Objective and subjective evaluation of nasal obstruction gives different information that together optimizes the diagnosis and the treatment of rhinologic patients. Acoustic rhinometry alone or in combination of other instruments for the measurement of nasal obstruction or patency should be used regularly in every outpatient clinic that treats patients with nasal obstruction as there is an increasing need of evidence-based therapies.
{"title":"Nasal Patency Measurement: State of the Art of Acoustic Rhinometry.","authors":"Giancarlo Ottaviano","doi":"10.1055/a-2218-7297","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2218-7297","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nasal obstruction is one of the main symptoms of different nasal pathologies. Many physiological and pathological conditions can produce nasal airflow impairment causing nasal obstruction and affecting patients' quality of life. There are different methods for the measurement of nasal obstruction, but in clinical practice the most common used are acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and peak nasal inspiratory flow. This review describes the fundamentals of acoustic rhinometry, its normal values, the different physiological and pathological conditions that can modify nasal patency, and the utility of this instrument for the measurement of nasal obstruction in clinical practice. Acoustic rhinometry is a simple test, so it is suitable for measurements in the pediatric population, i.e., for evaluating adenoid hypertrophy. Acoustic rhinometry normal values are available, unilaterally and bilaterally for pediatric and adult populations. Acoustic rhinometry has been demonstrated to be reproducible and even superior to rhinomanometry when measuring nasal modifications during challenges. It is possible to use acoustic rhinometry before and after nasal surgery. Measuring nasal cavities volume and cross-sectional area, acoustic rhinometry is particularly indicated in rhinosurgery, especially for the evaluation of spreader grafts. Brief considerations about the correlation between nasal symptoms, in particular the subjective sensation of nasal obstruction, and the acoustic rhinometry results as well as the correlation of acoustic rhinometry with other methods for the measurement of nasal obstruction are also reported. Objective and subjective evaluation of nasal obstruction gives different information that together optimizes the diagnosis and the treatment of rhinologic patients. Acoustic rhinometry alone or in combination of other instruments for the measurement of nasal obstruction or patency should be used regularly in every outpatient clinic that treats patients with nasal obstruction as there is an increasing need of evidence-based therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"304-309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138451314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-01-15DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777850
Simon Snoeks, Enrique Velasco, Karel Talavera, Peter W Hellings
Impairment of nasal breathing is a highly prevalent and bothersome symptom that affects daily functioning and/or sleep quality. Those surgeons dealing with patients seeking rhinoplasty need to carefully analyze the preoperative nasal breathing capacity and predict the positive or even negative impact of rhino(septo)plasty on nasal breathing. Given the lack of correlation between the subjective feeling of suboptimal nasal breathing and the objective measurements of nasal flow and nasal resistance, a critical and mainly clinical evaluation of all anatomical, mucosal, and sensory mechanisms involved in nasal obstruction is mandatory. Indeed, thermo-, mechano-, and chemosensory receptors on the nasal mucosa, airflow, and respiratory dynamics might all contribute to the overall perception of nasal breathing capacity. In this review, we provide an overview of the factors determining suboptimal nasal breathing including different diagnostic and experimental tests that can be performed to evaluate nasal flow and nasal resistance and current limitations in our understanding of the problem of nasal breathing in an individual patient. An algorithm for the preoperative or diagnostic workup for nasal obstruction is included that might be useful as a guide for clinicians dealing with patients seeking nose surgery.
{"title":"Nasal Obstruction: Overview of Pathophysiology and Presentation of a Clinically Relevant Preoperative Plan for Rhino(Septo)plasty.","authors":"Simon Snoeks, Enrique Velasco, Karel Talavera, Peter W Hellings","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1777850","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1777850","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Impairment of nasal breathing is a highly prevalent and bothersome symptom that affects daily functioning and/or sleep quality. Those surgeons dealing with patients seeking rhinoplasty need to carefully analyze the preoperative nasal breathing capacity and predict the positive or even negative impact of rhino(septo)plasty on nasal breathing. Given the lack of correlation between the subjective feeling of suboptimal nasal breathing and the objective measurements of nasal flow and nasal resistance, a critical and mainly clinical evaluation of all anatomical, mucosal, and sensory mechanisms involved in nasal obstruction is mandatory. Indeed, thermo-, mechano-, and chemosensory receptors on the nasal mucosa, airflow, and respiratory dynamics might all contribute to the overall perception of nasal breathing capacity. In this review, we provide an overview of the factors determining suboptimal nasal breathing including different diagnostic and experimental tests that can be performed to evaluate nasal flow and nasal resistance and current limitations in our understanding of the problem of nasal breathing in an individual patient. An algorithm for the preoperative or diagnostic workup for nasal obstruction is included that might be useful as a guide for clinicians dealing with patients seeking nose surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"275-286"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139471534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-11-28DOI: 10.1055/a-2218-7060
Vasco R L S Abreu, João A Xavier
Nasal obstruction (NO) is a common clinical symptom characterized by a subjective sensation of insufficient airflow through the nasal cavity and may result from various factors, including changes in nasal anatomy, inflammatory conditions, tumoral lesions, and other etiologies. While a thorough medical history and physical examination can often identify its cause, imaging is usually necessary to fully understand the problem. Computed tomography (CT) is the primary imaging modality used to evaluate the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, allowing for the identification of potential causes and structural abnormalities. However, when soft tissue characterization is required, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is also useful. Understanding the anatomical and pathological basis of NO is crucial for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Imaging techniques provide valuable information for identifying the underlying causes of NO and guiding treatment decisions. This article reviews the normal anatomy of the nasal cavity and adjacent paranasal sinuses as well as the several conditions that may affect breathing comfort (tumors, inflammatory diseases, bony and cartilaginous anatomical variants, and "nonobstructive" mucosal thickenings), showing their normal presentation on CT and MRI.
{"title":"Imaging Nasal Obstruction: An Objective Evaluation for a Subjective Complaint.","authors":"Vasco R L S Abreu, João A Xavier","doi":"10.1055/a-2218-7060","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2218-7060","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nasal obstruction (NO) is a common clinical symptom characterized by a subjective sensation of insufficient airflow through the nasal cavity and may result from various factors, including changes in nasal anatomy, inflammatory conditions, tumoral lesions, and other etiologies. While a thorough medical history and physical examination can often identify its cause, imaging is usually necessary to fully understand the problem. Computed tomography (CT) is the primary imaging modality used to evaluate the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, allowing for the identification of potential causes and structural abnormalities. However, when soft tissue characterization is required, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is also useful. Understanding the anatomical and pathological basis of NO is crucial for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Imaging techniques provide valuable information for identifying the underlying causes of NO and guiding treatment decisions. This article reviews the normal anatomy of the nasal cavity and adjacent paranasal sinuses as well as the several conditions that may affect breathing comfort (tumors, inflammatory diseases, bony and cartilaginous anatomical variants, and \"nonobstructive\" mucosal thickenings), showing their normal presentation on CT and MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"294-303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138451311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}