Background: This study aimed to investigate the effects of sleep hygiene education on blood pressure and sleep quality in patients diagnosed with essential hypertension.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 138 patients with essential hypertension at a family practice center in southern Turkey. Participants completed Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and their blood pressure was measured during the initial visit. Patients randomly assigned to the intervention group received sleep hygiene education during the same session. To support adherence, these participants were asked to keep a sleep diary for 8 weeks. At the end of this period, both groups were reassessed using the PSQI and blood pressure measurements. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.
Results: In our study, completed with 129 participants, sociodemographic characteristics were similar across groups. In the intervention group, the mean reduction in PSQI score was 3.4 points (95% CI: 2.8-4.0; P < 0.001). Systolic blood pressure decreased by 9.7 mmHg (95% CI: 7-12.5; P < 0.001), and diastolic blood pressure decreased by 6.3 mmHg (95% CI: 4.2-8.4; P < 0.001). No significant changes were observed in the control group.
Conclusions: Sleep hygiene education delivered in a primary care setting significantly improved sleep quality and reduced blood pressure levels in patients with essential hypertension. This approach may also help prevent complications related to hypertension. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT07257237; registered on 20 November 2025).
背景:本研究旨在探讨睡眠卫生教育对原发性高血压患者血压和睡眠质量的影响。方法:对土耳其南部一家家庭医疗中心138例原发性高血压患者进行随机对照试验。参与者完成了匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI),并在首次访问期间测量了他们的血压。随机分配到干预组的患者在同一时段接受睡眠卫生教育。为了支持坚持,这些参与者被要求保持8周的睡眠日记。在这段时间结束时,两组都使用PSQI和血压测量重新评估。数据分析采用SPSS version 22。结果:在我们的研究中,129名参与者的社会人口学特征在各组之间是相似的。干预组PSQI评分平均降低3.4分(95% CI: 2.8-4.0; P < 0.001)。收缩压降低9.7 mmHg (95% CI: 7-12.5; P < 0.001),舒张压降低6.3 mmHg (95% CI: 4.2-8.4; P < 0.001)。对照组未见明显变化。结论:在初级保健环境中进行睡眠卫生教育可显著改善原发性高血压患者的睡眠质量并降低血压水平。这种方法也可能有助于预防高血压相关的并发症。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov(标识符:NCT07257237;注册于2025年11月20日)。
{"title":"The effect of sleep hygiene education on sleep quality and blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension in a family practice center: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ozturk G Tutu, Veli Bilen, Cahit Ozer","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf110","DOIUrl":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf110","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effects of sleep hygiene education on blood pressure and sleep quality in patients diagnosed with essential hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 138 patients with essential hypertension at a family practice center in southern Turkey. Participants completed Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and their blood pressure was measured during the initial visit. Patients randomly assigned to the intervention group received sleep hygiene education during the same session. To support adherence, these participants were asked to keep a sleep diary for 8 weeks. At the end of this period, both groups were reassessed using the PSQI and blood pressure measurements. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, completed with 129 participants, sociodemographic characteristics were similar across groups. In the intervention group, the mean reduction in PSQI score was 3.4 points (95% CI: 2.8-4.0; P < 0.001). Systolic blood pressure decreased by 9.7 mmHg (95% CI: 7-12.5; P < 0.001), and diastolic blood pressure decreased by 6.3 mmHg (95% CI: 4.2-8.4; P < 0.001). No significant changes were observed in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sleep hygiene education delivered in a primary care setting significantly improved sleep quality and reduced blood pressure levels in patients with essential hypertension. This approach may also help prevent complications related to hypertension. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT07257237; registered on 20 November 2025).</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Juan Pedro Alonso, Javier Roberti, Natalí Ini, Andrea Falaschi, Lía Bosio, Marina Guglielmino, Erica Negri, Belén Peralta-Roca, Ana Paula Rodríguez, Inés Suárez-Anzorena, Viviana Rodríguez, Ezequiel García-Elorrio, Facundo Jorro-Barón
Background: Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly among older adults and individuals with chronic conditions. Early detection at the primary healthcare (PHC) level is essential to prevent unnecessary hospitalizations, ensure timely treatment, and reduce antibiotic misuse. This qualitative process evaluation examines the implementation of a collaborative quality improvement initiative aimed at enhancing early detection of ARIs in PHC settings in Mendoza, Argentina.
Methods: The intervention, which included the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2), a triage system, and portable pulse oximeters, sought to recognize early clinical deterioration due to ARIs among adults with suspected or confirmed respiratory COVID-19 in PHC. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 healthcare professionals to explore facilitators and barriers to implementation.
Results: The intervention's adaptability and design quality were praised, enabling tailored implementation and structured workflows. However, leadership engagement was limited, hindering coordination and resource allocation. Available resources and organizational incentives were insufficient, leading to high workloads and low motivation. External policies lacked formal mandates, reducing perceived legitimacy. Resistance to change and self-efficacy issues limited adoption. Despite these challenges, the intervention improved clinical decision-making and team collaboration, highlighting its potential when supported by strong leadership, adequate resources, and stakeholder involvement.
Conclusion: Findings emphasize the need for formative assessments, tailored strategies to address contextual challenges, and non-economic incentives to enhance implementation success. This study provides valuable insights for optimizing the integration of interventions in resource-constrained settings, particularly during public health crises.
{"title":"Qualitative process evaluation of a collaborative quality improvement initiative for timely detection of acute respiratory infections in primary care: insights from Argentina during the COVID-19 era.","authors":"Juan Pedro Alonso, Javier Roberti, Natalí Ini, Andrea Falaschi, Lía Bosio, Marina Guglielmino, Erica Negri, Belén Peralta-Roca, Ana Paula Rodríguez, Inés Suárez-Anzorena, Viviana Rodríguez, Ezequiel García-Elorrio, Facundo Jorro-Barón","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly among older adults and individuals with chronic conditions. Early detection at the primary healthcare (PHC) level is essential to prevent unnecessary hospitalizations, ensure timely treatment, and reduce antibiotic misuse. This qualitative process evaluation examines the implementation of a collaborative quality improvement initiative aimed at enhancing early detection of ARIs in PHC settings in Mendoza, Argentina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The intervention, which included the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2), a triage system, and portable pulse oximeters, sought to recognize early clinical deterioration due to ARIs among adults with suspected or confirmed respiratory COVID-19 in PHC. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 healthcare professionals to explore facilitators and barriers to implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention's adaptability and design quality were praised, enabling tailored implementation and structured workflows. However, leadership engagement was limited, hindering coordination and resource allocation. Available resources and organizational incentives were insufficient, leading to high workloads and low motivation. External policies lacked formal mandates, reducing perceived legitimacy. Resistance to change and self-efficacy issues limited adoption. Despite these challenges, the intervention improved clinical decision-making and team collaboration, highlighting its potential when supported by strong leadership, adequate resources, and stakeholder involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings emphasize the need for formative assessments, tailored strategies to address contextual challenges, and non-economic incentives to enhance implementation success. This study provides valuable insights for optimizing the integration of interventions in resource-constrained settings, particularly during public health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145855168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bianca T Strooij, Marije T Te Winkel, Sharon Remmelzwaal, Pauline Slottje, Petra J M Elders, Karlijn J Joling, Irene G M van Valkengoed, Hein P J van Hout, Marieke T Blom, Otto R Maarsingh
Background: Continuity of care (CoC) is linked to better outcomes. Particularly, older adults and those with chronic conditions, like type 2 diabetes (T2D) and dementia, may benefit from CoC. Individuals with a migration background (MB) face challenges in accessing adequate healthcare. Our aim was to study associations between MB and personal continuity of general practitioner (GP) care among older adults, and in subgroups with T2D and dementia.
Methods: Observational cohort study (2013-8) based on electronic records from 48 Dutch general practices linked to data from Statistics Netherlands. We specifically compared adults who migrated to the Netherlands to those without MB. The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI; low/medium/high) was used to measure CoC. We used multilevel ordinal regression to estimate associations between MB and CoC, adjusted for follow-up time/age/gender/comorbidity/income/practice.
Results: 46 663 individuals aged ≥50 years were included: 72.9% with no MB, 5.7% with Surinamese, 4.3% Moroccan, 2.7% Turkish, 5.1% European, and 9.3% other MB. Compared with those without MB, persons with a Moroccan MB had lower odds of having moderate or high CoC [odds ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89], and persons with a European MB had higher odds of having moderate or high CoC (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07-1.26). Persons with a Moroccan MB in the T2D subgroup had lower odds of having moderate or high CoC (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.89). No differences were found in the dementia subgroup.
Conclusions: This study reveals inequalities in personal continuity of GP care by MB in the Netherlands. Interventions to improve CoC should actively incorporate MB groups to promote equitable CoC.
背景:护理的连续性(CoC)与更好的结果相关。特别是老年人和慢性疾病患者,如2型糖尿病(T2D)和痴呆症,可能受益于CoC。具有移民背景的个人在获得适当的医疗保健方面面临挑战。我们的目的是研究老年人群以及T2D和痴呆亚组中MB与个人全科医生(GP)护理连续性之间的关系。方法:观察性队列研究(2013-8)基于48个荷兰全科诊所的电子记录,这些记录与荷兰统计局的数据相关。我们特别比较了移民到荷兰的成年人和没有MB的成年人。使用赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数(HHI;低/中/高)来测量CoC。我们使用多水平有序回归来估计MB和CoC之间的关联,并根据随访时间/年龄/性别/合并症/收入/实践进行调整。结果:纳入年龄≥50岁的46 663人:72.9%无MB, 5.7%苏里南MB, 4.3%摩洛哥MB, 2.7%土耳其MB, 5.1%欧洲MB和9.3%其他MB。与没有MB的人相比,摩洛哥MB患者患中度或高度CoC的几率较低[比值比(or) 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89],欧洲MB患者患中度或高度CoC的几率较高(or 1.16, 95% CI 1.07-1.26)。T2D亚组摩洛哥MB患者出现中度或高CoC的几率较低(or 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.89)。在痴呆亚组中没有发现差异。结论:本研究揭示了荷兰MB在全科医生护理的个人连续性方面的不平等。改善CoC的干预措施应积极纳入MB群体,以促进公平的CoC。
{"title":"Continuity of care for all? Associations between migration background and personal continuity among persons aged 50 and older in Dutch primary care: a registry-based observational study.","authors":"Bianca T Strooij, Marije T Te Winkel, Sharon Remmelzwaal, Pauline Slottje, Petra J M Elders, Karlijn J Joling, Irene G M van Valkengoed, Hein P J van Hout, Marieke T Blom, Otto R Maarsingh","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf111","DOIUrl":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf111","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuity of care (CoC) is linked to better outcomes. Particularly, older adults and those with chronic conditions, like type 2 diabetes (T2D) and dementia, may benefit from CoC. Individuals with a migration background (MB) face challenges in accessing adequate healthcare. Our aim was to study associations between MB and personal continuity of general practitioner (GP) care among older adults, and in subgroups with T2D and dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational cohort study (2013-8) based on electronic records from 48 Dutch general practices linked to data from Statistics Netherlands. We specifically compared adults who migrated to the Netherlands to those without MB. The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI; low/medium/high) was used to measure CoC. We used multilevel ordinal regression to estimate associations between MB and CoC, adjusted for follow-up time/age/gender/comorbidity/income/practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>46 663 individuals aged ≥50 years were included: 72.9% with no MB, 5.7% with Surinamese, 4.3% Moroccan, 2.7% Turkish, 5.1% European, and 9.3% other MB. Compared with those without MB, persons with a Moroccan MB had lower odds of having moderate or high CoC [odds ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89], and persons with a European MB had higher odds of having moderate or high CoC (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07-1.26). Persons with a Moroccan MB in the T2D subgroup had lower odds of having moderate or high CoC (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.89). No differences were found in the dementia subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals inequalities in personal continuity of GP care by MB in the Netherlands. Interventions to improve CoC should actively incorporate MB groups to promote equitable CoC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12823272/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ralph T H Leijenaar, Céline Buurman, Jesse Jansen, Jochen W L Cals
Background: Unnecessary vitamin tests are among the most frequently mentioned low-value care practices among Dutch general practitioners (GPs). Understanding drivers for vitamin testing from a GP's perspective is key for developing effective interventions.
Objectives: This study explored GPs' perspectives on drivers of vitamin D and B12 testing, focusing on potential differences between GPs in practices with high and low testing rates, using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B) behavioural science framework.
Methods: Laboratory data from 57 primary care centres (PCCs) in the South of the Netherlands (2016-2019) identified the 15 PCCs with the lowest and highest vitamin testing rates. Thirty GPs, one per PCC, were purposively sampled to ensure variation in testing rate and background. Semi-structured interviews (May-July 2020) covered general perceptions, as well as social, cognitive, and motivational factors. Interviews were analysed by mapping factors driving vitamin testing to the COM-B model.
Results: Several medical and non-medical factors affecting vitamin D and B12 test ordering in general practice were identified, which could be linked to all three COM-B components at the GP (e.g. education), patient (e.g. informational material), and service level (e.g. laboratory forms).
Conclusion: Education, feedback on testing behaviour, evidence-based patient informational material, clear evidence-based guidelines, and modification of laboratory request forms by adding test costs and indications of at-risk groups were identified by participants as promising strategies to reduce unnecessary vitamin testing.
{"title":"Factors driving vitamin D and B12 testing in Dutch primary care from the general practitioners' perspective: a qualitative interview study.","authors":"Ralph T H Leijenaar, Céline Buurman, Jesse Jansen, Jochen W L Cals","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unnecessary vitamin tests are among the most frequently mentioned low-value care practices among Dutch general practitioners (GPs). Understanding drivers for vitamin testing from a GP's perspective is key for developing effective interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored GPs' perspectives on drivers of vitamin D and B12 testing, focusing on potential differences between GPs in practices with high and low testing rates, using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B) behavioural science framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Laboratory data from 57 primary care centres (PCCs) in the South of the Netherlands (2016-2019) identified the 15 PCCs with the lowest and highest vitamin testing rates. Thirty GPs, one per PCC, were purposively sampled to ensure variation in testing rate and background. Semi-structured interviews (May-July 2020) covered general perceptions, as well as social, cognitive, and motivational factors. Interviews were analysed by mapping factors driving vitamin testing to the COM-B model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several medical and non-medical factors affecting vitamin D and B12 test ordering in general practice were identified, which could be linked to all three COM-B components at the GP (e.g. education), patient (e.g. informational material), and service level (e.g. laboratory forms).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Education, feedback on testing behaviour, evidence-based patient informational material, clear evidence-based guidelines, and modification of laboratory request forms by adding test costs and indications of at-risk groups were identified by participants as promising strategies to reduce unnecessary vitamin testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145958718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Avi Goodman, Aidan G Cashin, Isha Mishra, Mia Ryan, Jennifer McBride, Steven Marsh, Tianle Xie, Gustavo Batista, Oyungerel Byambasuren, James H McAuley, Rodrigo R N Rizzo
Background: Back pain is the leading musculoskeletal reason for visits in general practice. Time constraints on consultations affect diagnostic decisions and the delivery of evidence-based care. This study explored patient and general practitioner (GP) perspectives on digital tools to support decision-making in back pain management.
Methods: We conducted separate focus groups between June and August 2024 with people experiencing back pain and with registered Australian GPs. We analyzed data using thematic analysis with an inductive approach.
Results: We interviewed 23 participants: 13 with back pain and 10 GPs. Patients appreciated digital decision-support tools for increasing knowledge and clarifying persistent questions after consultations. GPs, in contrast, emphasized red flag screening, symptom monitoring, and time savings. Shared concerns included information trustworthiness, lack of personalization, and cost, while facilitators included integration into practice management systems and GP endorsement.
Conclusions: Our findings highlight opportunities to integrate digital decision-support tools at multiple points in GPs' workflows-before, during, and after consultations-to address the needs of both patients with back pain and GPs. When used before consultations, such tools can help patients prepare by increasing their knowledge, supporting more productive discussions, informing decisions about whether a visit is necessary, and assisting GPs in identifying potential red flags. During consultations, the tools can provide clinicians with updates on current evidence and supply educational resources or prescriptions, particularly for evidence-based lifestyle interventions. After consultations, they can support follow-up by monitoring the patient's condition and addressing any persistent questions that may arise.
{"title":"\"A tool to support, not replace\": patient and general practitioner perceptions of digital decision support tools for back pain.","authors":"Avi Goodman, Aidan G Cashin, Isha Mishra, Mia Ryan, Jennifer McBride, Steven Marsh, Tianle Xie, Gustavo Batista, Oyungerel Byambasuren, James H McAuley, Rodrigo R N Rizzo","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf098","DOIUrl":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf098","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Back pain is the leading musculoskeletal reason for visits in general practice. Time constraints on consultations affect diagnostic decisions and the delivery of evidence-based care. This study explored patient and general practitioner (GP) perspectives on digital tools to support decision-making in back pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted separate focus groups between June and August 2024 with people experiencing back pain and with registered Australian GPs. We analyzed data using thematic analysis with an inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 23 participants: 13 with back pain and 10 GPs. Patients appreciated digital decision-support tools for increasing knowledge and clarifying persistent questions after consultations. GPs, in contrast, emphasized red flag screening, symptom monitoring, and time savings. Shared concerns included information trustworthiness, lack of personalization, and cost, while facilitators included integration into practice management systems and GP endorsement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight opportunities to integrate digital decision-support tools at multiple points in GPs' workflows-before, during, and after consultations-to address the needs of both patients with back pain and GPs. When used before consultations, such tools can help patients prepare by increasing their knowledge, supporting more productive discussions, informing decisions about whether a visit is necessary, and assisting GPs in identifying potential red flags. During consultations, the tools can provide clinicians with updates on current evidence and supply educational resources or prescriptions, particularly for evidence-based lifestyle interventions. After consultations, they can support follow-up by monitoring the patient's condition and addressing any persistent questions that may arise.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12754595/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145862511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cherry Chu, Dorsa Ghahramani, Trish Rawn, Victoria Burton, Lindsay Bevan, Brooklyn Reidner, Noah Ivers, Jennifer Shuldiner, Mina Tadrous
Background: Academic detailing (AD), a one-on-one evidence-based educational outreach strategy for healthcare providers, has been effective in improving prescribing behavior. However, its impact on diabetes care outcomes in Canada remains underexplored.
Objective: We aimed to compare prescribing and care patterns for type 2 diabetes between physicians who received AD and those who did not.
Methods: We conducted a population-based matched cohort study in Ontario, Canada, using health administrative databases. We included primary care physicians with active billing from September 2020 to September 2022. Each AD physician was matched to a maximum four controls based on index year, region, sex, years in practice, and proportion of patients with diabetes. We assessed monthly clinical outcomes for 12 months pre and 18 months postintervention using mixed-effects models.
Results: The cohort included 372 AD and 1450 control physicians, with balanced demographics. At baseline, AD physicians saw fewer patients (1292 vs. 1526) but delivered more appointments per patient (4.2 vs. 3.0). Both groups had 15% of patients with diabetes. Post-intervention, biosimilar insulin use increased more sharply in the AD group (9.0% vs. 5.6% monthly). AD physicians consistently had higher B12 testing among metformin users (76.5% vs. 60.0%) and greater use of SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists (40.1% vs. 31.5%). A1C control (<8%) remained similar across groups (∼80%). Time × group differences were significant for all outcomes (P < 0.001) except B12 testing (P = 0.790) and A1C levels (P = 0.815).
Conclusions: The AD group saw greater improvements in diabetes prescribing post-intervention. Engaging physicians in AD could enhance diabetes care quality.
背景:学术细节(AD)是针对医疗保健提供者的一对一循证教育推广策略,已有效改善处方行为。然而,它对加拿大糖尿病护理结果的影响仍未得到充分探讨。目的:我们旨在比较接受AD治疗和未接受AD治疗的2型糖尿病医生的处方和护理模式。方法:我们在加拿大安大略省使用卫生管理数据库进行了一项基于人群的匹配队列研究。我们纳入了2020年9月至2022年9月期间活跃计费的初级保健医生。每位AD医生根据指标年份、地区、性别、执业年数和糖尿病患者比例最多匹配4名对照。我们使用混合效应模型评估干预前12个月和干预后18个月的每月临床结果。结果:该队列包括372名AD医生和1450名对照医生,人口统计学平衡。在基线时,AD医生看到的患者较少(1292对1526),但每个患者的预约次数较多(4.2对3.0)。两组都有15%的患者患有糖尿病。干预后,AD组的生物类似药胰岛素使用量急剧增加(每月9.0% vs 5.6%)。AD医生在二甲双胍使用者中始终有较高的B12检测(76.5% vs. 60.0%),更多地使用SGLT2抑制剂或GLP-1受体激动剂(40.1% vs. 31.5%)。结论:AD组干预后糖尿病处方改善更大。让医生参与AD可以提高糖尿病护理质量。
{"title":"Effectiveness of an academic detailing service to support appropriate prescribing and care in patients with type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Cherry Chu, Dorsa Ghahramani, Trish Rawn, Victoria Burton, Lindsay Bevan, Brooklyn Reidner, Noah Ivers, Jennifer Shuldiner, Mina Tadrous","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf101","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic detailing (AD), a one-on-one evidence-based educational outreach strategy for healthcare providers, has been effective in improving prescribing behavior. However, its impact on diabetes care outcomes in Canada remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to compare prescribing and care patterns for type 2 diabetes between physicians who received AD and those who did not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based matched cohort study in Ontario, Canada, using health administrative databases. We included primary care physicians with active billing from September 2020 to September 2022. Each AD physician was matched to a maximum four controls based on index year, region, sex, years in practice, and proportion of patients with diabetes. We assessed monthly clinical outcomes for 12 months pre and 18 months postintervention using mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 372 AD and 1450 control physicians, with balanced demographics. At baseline, AD physicians saw fewer patients (1292 vs. 1526) but delivered more appointments per patient (4.2 vs. 3.0). Both groups had 15% of patients with diabetes. Post-intervention, biosimilar insulin use increased more sharply in the AD group (9.0% vs. 5.6% monthly). AD physicians consistently had higher B12 testing among metformin users (76.5% vs. 60.0%) and greater use of SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists (40.1% vs. 31.5%). A1C control (<8%) remained similar across groups (∼80%). Time × group differences were significant for all outcomes (P < 0.001) except B12 testing (P = 0.790) and A1C levels (P = 0.815).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AD group saw greater improvements in diabetes prescribing post-intervention. Engaging physicians in AD could enhance diabetes care quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mary Cronin, Aisling Jennings, Nicola Cornally, Irene Hartigan, Séan O'Dowd, Marieke Perry, Suzanne Timmons, Kieran Walsh, Tony Foley
Background: Timely diagnosis of dementia is a public health priority, with general practitioners (GPs) central to symptom recognition and assessment. The emergence of biomarkers and anti-amyloid therapies makes accurate, timely diagnosis more critical than ever, introducing new complexities for general practice. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are vital tools to support clinical decision-making, but their applicability to the general practice setting is uncertain.
Objectives: This scoping review analyses how international CPGs define and support the GP's role in the dementia diagnostic process.
Methods: Following the Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework, five electronic databases and multiple grey literature sources were searched for dementia CPGs published between 2019 and 2025. Guideline quality was assessed using selected domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument (AGREE II).
Results: Fifteen CPGs from a range of healthcare systems were included. Only two were specifically developed for general practice. While most CPGs positioned GPs as key to timely diagnosis, the recommendations were predominantly developed from a secondary-care perspective and failed to address the fundamental barrier of limited consultation time. Furthermore, practical guidance for GPs on integrating new biomarkers and anti-amyloid therapies was almost absent.
Conclusions: A disconnect exists between CPG recommendations and the realities of general practice, rendering much of the guidance aspirational rather than actionable. To be effective, future guidelines must ensure recommendations are feasible, address resource constraints, and establish clear pathways for the new biological era of dementia care. Without this, general practice will remain ill-equipped to meet the growing challenges of dementia diagnosis and management.
{"title":"The role of general practitioners in dementia diagnosis: a scoping review of clinical practice guidelines.","authors":"Mary Cronin, Aisling Jennings, Nicola Cornally, Irene Hartigan, Séan O'Dowd, Marieke Perry, Suzanne Timmons, Kieran Walsh, Tony Foley","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf103","DOIUrl":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely diagnosis of dementia is a public health priority, with general practitioners (GPs) central to symptom recognition and assessment. The emergence of biomarkers and anti-amyloid therapies makes accurate, timely diagnosis more critical than ever, introducing new complexities for general practice. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are vital tools to support clinical decision-making, but their applicability to the general practice setting is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review analyses how international CPGs define and support the GP's role in the dementia diagnostic process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework, five electronic databases and multiple grey literature sources were searched for dementia CPGs published between 2019 and 2025. Guideline quality was assessed using selected domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument (AGREE II).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen CPGs from a range of healthcare systems were included. Only two were specifically developed for general practice. While most CPGs positioned GPs as key to timely diagnosis, the recommendations were predominantly developed from a secondary-care perspective and failed to address the fundamental barrier of limited consultation time. Furthermore, practical guidance for GPs on integrating new biomarkers and anti-amyloid therapies was almost absent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A disconnect exists between CPG recommendations and the realities of general practice, rendering much of the guidance aspirational rather than actionable. To be effective, future guidelines must ensure recommendations are feasible, address resource constraints, and establish clear pathways for the new biological era of dementia care. Without this, general practice will remain ill-equipped to meet the growing challenges of dementia diagnosis and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12823279/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Uzair Shabbir, Ray O'Connor, Joe MacDonagh, Andrew O'Regan
Background: General practice across Europe faces a workforce crisis, with a projected shortfall of up to 1660 general practitioners in Ireland by 2028. While policy interventions have been proposed, a gap remains between the Irish health system's strategic objectives and the day-to-day realities experienced by general practitioners.
Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of Irish general practitioners in addressing recruitment and retention challenges in general practice. Specific objectives include identifying solutions and the supports necessary for sustainable future general practice.
Methods: A qualitative study design was employed, utilizing semi-structured online interviews with general practitioners recruited through a network affiliated with a university. Thematic analysis was conducted by four experienced researchers. Data collection continued until thematic saturation was achieved.
Results: Three primary themes emerged: (i) Towards a More Effective Health Service-participants emphasized the necessity for a whole-system approach to address recruitment and retention shortfalls; (ii) Role Clarification, Boundary Setting, and Support-participants highlighted the need for role reallocation within multidisciplinary teams to allow them to focus on complex cases; and (iii) Practice-Level Response-digital infrastructure improvements and administrative task reallocation were identified as key strategies to reduce workload and enhance patient care.
Conclusion: To address the general practice workforce crisis, systemic reforms, expanded multidisciplinary teams, and practice-level adaptations are needed. The findings reflect the importance of general practitioner involvement in healthcare planning and policy development. These insights will inform targeted policy interventions in Ireland and in healthcare systems facing similar workforce challenges.
{"title":"Addressing systemic workforce challenges in general practice-a qualitative study of general practitioners in Ireland.","authors":"Uzair Shabbir, Ray O'Connor, Joe MacDonagh, Andrew O'Regan","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf094","DOIUrl":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf094","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practice across Europe faces a workforce crisis, with a projected shortfall of up to 1660 general practitioners in Ireland by 2028. While policy interventions have been proposed, a gap remains between the Irish health system's strategic objectives and the day-to-day realities experienced by general practitioners.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of Irish general practitioners in addressing recruitment and retention challenges in general practice. Specific objectives include identifying solutions and the supports necessary for sustainable future general practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study design was employed, utilizing semi-structured online interviews with general practitioners recruited through a network affiliated with a university. Thematic analysis was conducted by four experienced researchers. Data collection continued until thematic saturation was achieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three primary themes emerged: (i) Towards a More Effective Health Service-participants emphasized the necessity for a whole-system approach to address recruitment and retention shortfalls; (ii) Role Clarification, Boundary Setting, and Support-participants highlighted the need for role reallocation within multidisciplinary teams to allow them to focus on complex cases; and (iii) Practice-Level Response-digital infrastructure improvements and administrative task reallocation were identified as key strategies to reduce workload and enhance patient care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To address the general practice workforce crisis, systemic reforms, expanded multidisciplinary teams, and practice-level adaptations are needed. The findings reflect the importance of general practitioner involvement in healthcare planning and policy development. These insights will inform targeted policy interventions in Ireland and in healthcare systems facing similar workforce challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12686944/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145707883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rebekah Bernard, Phillip B Shaffer, Sharon L D'Souza, Elana Pearl Ben-Joseph, Carmen M Kavali
Introduction: Nurse practitioner (NP) organizations have advocated for expanding the NP scope of practice as a means of meeting the increasing demand for primary care services. Florida enacted the NP unsupervised practice of medicine (UPM) as part of House Bill 607 in July 2020, with the stipulation that autonomous NPs practice within primary care. The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which autonomous NPs in Florida have limited their scope of practice to primary care.
Methods: We obtained a database of the population of autonomous NPs in Florida on 27 August 2024 from the Florida Department of Health, which contained a total of 11 925 NPs. Between November 2024 and February 2025, we randomly sampled 464 autonomous NPs across the state of Florida, ultimately reaching 328 autonomous NP practices.
Results: Of the 328 autonomous NP practices reached, 128 NPs were working in primary care, and 6 NPs were working in non-clinical roles. The remaining 194 autonomous NPs were working clinically in non-primary care settings, with the top five most common being (i) cosmetic and non-standard medical/surgical practices such as antiaging, IV hydration, vitamin infusions, hormonal therapy, and supplements (n = 53), (ii) psychiatry/addiction medicine (n = 53), (iii) emergency/urgent care (n = 20), (iv) inpatient medicine (n = 13), and (v) cardiology (n = 9).
Conclusions: Our study provides strong evidence that many autonomous NPs in Florida have established specialty practices and other services not within the legal scope of practice of Florida law. Stricter enforcement of NP practice within the scope of training and legislation is needed.
{"title":"Autonomous nurse practitioners in Florida frequently practice outside their legal scope of primary care: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Rebekah Bernard, Phillip B Shaffer, Sharon L D'Souza, Elana Pearl Ben-Joseph, Carmen M Kavali","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nurse practitioner (NP) organizations have advocated for expanding the NP scope of practice as a means of meeting the increasing demand for primary care services. Florida enacted the NP unsupervised practice of medicine (UPM) as part of House Bill 607 in July 2020, with the stipulation that autonomous NPs practice within primary care. The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which autonomous NPs in Florida have limited their scope of practice to primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained a database of the population of autonomous NPs in Florida on 27 August 2024 from the Florida Department of Health, which contained a total of 11 925 NPs. Between November 2024 and February 2025, we randomly sampled 464 autonomous NPs across the state of Florida, ultimately reaching 328 autonomous NP practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 328 autonomous NP practices reached, 128 NPs were working in primary care, and 6 NPs were working in non-clinical roles. The remaining 194 autonomous NPs were working clinically in non-primary care settings, with the top five most common being (i) cosmetic and non-standard medical/surgical practices such as antiaging, IV hydration, vitamin infusions, hormonal therapy, and supplements (n = 53), (ii) psychiatry/addiction medicine (n = 53), (iii) emergency/urgent care (n = 20), (iv) inpatient medicine (n = 13), and (v) cardiology (n = 9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study provides strong evidence that many autonomous NPs in Florida have established specialty practices and other services not within the legal scope of practice of Florida law. Stricter enforcement of NP practice within the scope of training and legislation is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145862566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Strengthening prenatal bonding during pregnancy may enhance postpartum mother-infant bonding and improve maternal-infant interactions. This study aimed to examine the effect of Bonding-Based Support provided during the perinatal period on prenatal bonding, early period mother-infant bonding indicators, and maternal bonding.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 70 primigravidae with low prenatal bonding scores (intervention group: n = 34; control group: n = 36). In addition to standard hospital care, the intervention group received a "Bonding-Based Support Program," designed to enhance maternal-infant bonding. This hybrid intervention included video-based online training during pregnancy and face-to-face counselling and support immediately after birth. Data were collected using the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS), the Maternal Attachment Inventory (MAI), and the Early Period Mother-Infant Bonding Indicators Assessment Scale.
Results: Pre-test scores from the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS) and its sub-dimensions (Attachment Quality and Time Spent on Attachment) showed no significant differences between groups. However, post-test MAAS scores and sub-dimensions were significantly higher in the intervention group. Significant improvements were also observed in the intervention group on the Early Period Mother-Infant Bonding Indicators Assessment Scale. Moreover, maternal bonding assessed by the Maternal Attachment Inventory was significantly better in the intervention group compared to the control.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that providing Bonding-Based Support during the early perinatal period has a positive impact on maternal bonding, as shown by both self-reported measures and observational indicators. This highlights the potential of targeted bonding support programmes to promote early and sustained maternal-infant connections.
{"title":"Investigation of the effect of bonding-based support given during the perinatal period on maternal bonding.","authors":"Ozge Karakaya Suzan, Nursan Cinar","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf093","DOIUrl":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf093","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Strengthening prenatal bonding during pregnancy may enhance postpartum mother-infant bonding and improve maternal-infant interactions. This study aimed to examine the effect of Bonding-Based Support provided during the perinatal period on prenatal bonding, early period mother-infant bonding indicators, and maternal bonding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 70 primigravidae with low prenatal bonding scores (intervention group: n = 34; control group: n = 36). In addition to standard hospital care, the intervention group received a \"Bonding-Based Support Program,\" designed to enhance maternal-infant bonding. This hybrid intervention included video-based online training during pregnancy and face-to-face counselling and support immediately after birth. Data were collected using the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS), the Maternal Attachment Inventory (MAI), and the Early Period Mother-Infant Bonding Indicators Assessment Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-test scores from the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS) and its sub-dimensions (Attachment Quality and Time Spent on Attachment) showed no significant differences between groups. However, post-test MAAS scores and sub-dimensions were significantly higher in the intervention group. Significant improvements were also observed in the intervention group on the Early Period Mother-Infant Bonding Indicators Assessment Scale. Moreover, maternal bonding assessed by the Maternal Attachment Inventory was significantly better in the intervention group compared to the control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings indicate that providing Bonding-Based Support during the early perinatal period has a positive impact on maternal bonding, as shown by both self-reported measures and observational indicators. This highlights the potential of targeted bonding support programmes to promote early and sustained maternal-infant connections.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145848992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}