European urology oncology最新文献

Background and objective: Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUCa) ranks as the costliest cancer to treat per patient due to frequent interventions and expensive follow-ups. Investigating first-line therapies, combinations such as enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab (EV + P) and gemcitabine/cisplatin + nivolumab exhibit significant overall survival benefits compared with the standard treatment (SoC; gemcitabine/cisplatin). Here, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis for mUCa.

Methods: We developed a Markov model from a payer perspective, filtering clinical data from the phase 3 Checkmate-901 and EV302/Keynote-A39 trials. Monte Carlo simulation was used to identify the optimal treatment from a socioeconomic perspective in Germany and the USA. Finally, we compared the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of each modality at different willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds.

Key findings and limitations: At a lifetime horizon, SoC, gemcitabine/cisplatin + nivolumab, and EV + P were associated with average costs of €163 424 (USA: $458 006), €206 853 (USA: $597 802), and €401 170 (USA: $1 228 455), and gained quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 1.21, 1.71, and 2.31, respectively. The ICERs of the newer strategies were €87 340 (USA: $281 142; gemcitabine/cisplatin + nivolumab) and €216 140 (USA: $700 448; EV + P). At a commonly used WTP threshold of €/$100 000, gemcitabine/cisplatin + nivolumab would be the optimal strategy in Germany, while EV + P would require a price reduction of 46% (USA: 82%) to be cost effective.

Conclusions and clinical implications: QALYs nearly double with EV + P compared with the current SoC; yet, current costs may not be justified from a strict socioeconomic perspective. Despite its lower oncological benefit, gemcitabine/cisplatin + nivolumab should be considered for first-line therapy due to favorable cost effectiveness, especially in Europe. Establishing individual risk factors is essential for optimizing therapeutic response and treatment costs in the future.

Patient summary: This report presents a cost-effectiveness analysis of emerging treatment options for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The combination of enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab emerged as the most effective treatment; however, it also proved to be the costliest. From a purely socioeconomic standpoint, the combination of gemcitabine/cisplatin and nivolumab represents a cost-effective alternative at least in Germany.

Background and objective: Although prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to diagnose and stage prostate cancer (PCa), the biologic and clinical significance of MRI visibility of the disease is unclear. Our aim was to examine the existing knowledge regarding the molecular correlates of MRI visibility of PCa.

Methods: The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were queried through November 2023. We defined MRI-visible and MRI-invisible lesions based on the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, and compared these based on the genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic characteristics.

Key findings and limitations: From 2015 individual records, 25 were selected for qualitative data synthesis. Current evidence supports the polygenic nature of MRI visibility, primarily influenced by genes related to stroma, adhesion, and cellular organization. Several gene signatures related to MRI visibility were associated with oncologic outcomes, which support that tumors appearing as PI-RADS 4-5 lesions harbor lethal disease. Accordingly, MRI-invisible tumors detected by systematic biopsies were, generally, less aggressive and had a more favorable prognosis; however, some MRI-invisible tumors harbored molecular features of biologically aggressive PCa. Among the commercially available prognostic gene panels, only Decipher was strongly associated with MRI visibility.

Conclusions and clinical implications: High PI-RADS score is associated with biologically and clinically aggressive PCa molecular phenotypes, and could potentially be used as a biomarker. However, MRI-invisible lesions can harbor adverse features, advocating the continued use of systemic biopsies. Further research to refine the integration of imaging data to prognostic assessment is warranted.

Patient summary: Magnetic resonance imaging visibility of prostate cancer is a polygenic trait. Higher Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores are associated with features of biologically and clinically aggressive cancer.

Background and objective: Urinary tumor DNA (utDNA) profiling identifies mutations associated with urothelial carcinoma and can be used to detect minimal residual disease (MRD). We evaluate the utility of utDNA profiling to predict treatment failure in bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive high-grade (HG) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treated with nadofaragene firadenovec.

Methods: Urine was collected from participants prior to induction (n = 32) and at their 3-mo evaluation (n = 18) in the parallel-arm, phase 2 study (NCT01687244) of nadofaragene firadenovec. The UroAmp MRD assay (Convergent Genomics, South San Francisco, CA, USA) was used to perform utDNA testing. Risk of HG NMIBC recurrence was determined using two algorithm versions, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was assessed using a Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Key findings and limitations: TP53, TERT, PIK3CA, ARID1A, PLEKHS1, ELF3, and ERBB2 were the most prevalently mutated genes. With pretreatment urine, the validated MRD algorithm resulted in 12-mo RFS of 56% for negative and 22% for positive patients (p = 0.097). The experimental, enhanced algorithm classified two additional patients as positive, giving RFS of 71% for negative and 20% for positive patients (p = 0.012). With 3-mo urine, both algorithms gave RFS of 100% for negative and 38% for positive patients (p = 0.038). Longitudinal utDNA testing classified patients as negative (7%), complete responders (13%), partial responders (27%), unresponsive (20%), and expanding (33%).

Conclusions and clinical implications: Urinary MRD testing after nadofaragene firadenovec induction provided statistically significant prognostication of recurrence among phase 2 trial participants.

Patient summary: By analyzing urine-borne tumor DNA, we can help determine which patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer are at the greatest risk of recurrence when receiving second-line therapy.

Background and objective: In PROpel (NCT03732820), olaparib + abiraterone resulted in a statistically significant radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) benefit and numerically prolonged overall survival (OS) versus placebo + abiraterone in first-line (1L) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Here, we report post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses in patients with asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic or symptomatic disease at baseline.

Methods: Patients were randomised 1:1 to olaparib (300 mg b.i.d.) or placebo with abiraterone (1000 mg o.d.) + prednisone/prednisolone (5 mg b.i.d.). For this post hoc exploratory analysis, patients with a Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) item 3 score of <4 and no opiate use were classified as asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic; those with a BPI-SF item 3 score of ≥4 and/or opiate use were classified as symptomatic. Subgroup analyses included investigator-assessed rPFS, OS, objective response rate, time to second progression or death, health-related quality of life, and safety.

Key findings and limitations: The median rPFS in asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients (n = 560) was 27.6 mo for olaparib + abiraterone versus 19.1 mo for placebo + abiraterone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.76). For symptomatic patients (n = 183), equivalent values were 14.1 versus 13.8 mo (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.54-1.13). At the final planned OS analysis, the median OS in asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients was not reached for olaparib + abiraterone versus 39.5 mo for placebo + abiraterone (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.00). For symptomatic patients, equivalent values were 22.9 versus 22.8 mo (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.58-1.16). Other outcomes showed no meaningful differences between the subgroups.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Olaparib + abiraterone provided efficacy benefits in 1L mCRPC patients with either asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic or symptomatic disease. A larger benefit occurred in asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients.

Patient summary: PROpel, a phase 3 clinical trial, looked at whether combining olaparib with abiraterone delays the progression of patients' cancer compared with placebo plus abiraterone. Patients with or without pain symptoms associated with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were eligible for enrolment into the trial. Results showed that olaparib plus abiraterone reduced the risk of disease progression and death, with a larger benefit observed in patients without or with mild pain symptoms than in those with pain symptoms.

Background and objective: An array of treatment-related toxicities result from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa), compromising function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Exercise has been demonstrated to counter a number of these adverse effects including decreased HRQoL; however, when exercise should be initiated is less clear. This study aims to examine whether commencing exercise when ADT is initiated rather than later during treatment is more effective in countering adverse effects on HRQoL.

Methods: Men with PCa (48-84 yr) initiating ADT were randomised to immediate exercise (IMEX; n = 54) or delayed exercise (DEL; n = 48) for 12 mo. IMEX consisted of 6 mo of supervised resistance/aerobic/impact exercise commenced at the initiation of ADT with 6 mo of follow-up. DEL consisted of 6 mo of usual care followed by 6 mo of the same exercise programme. HRQoL was assessed using the Short Form-36 at baseline and 6 and 12 mo. Intention to treat was utilised for the analyses that included group × time repeated-measures analysis of variance using log transformed data.

Key findings and limitations: There were a significant group × time interaction for the physical functioning domain (p = 0.045) and physical component summary score (p = 0.005), and a significant time effect for bodily pain (p < 0.001) and vitality domains (p < 0.001), with HRQoL maintained in IMEX and declining in DEL at 6 mo. Exercise in DEL reversed declines in vitality and in the physical component summary score, with no differences at 12 mo compared with baseline. Limitations include treatment alterations during the intervention.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Concurrently initiating exercise and ADT in patients with PCa preserves HRQoL, whereas exercise initiated while on established ADT regimens reverses declines in some HRQoL domains.

Patient summary: To avoid initial treatment-related adverse effects on health-related quality of life, exercise medicine should be initiated at the start of treatment.

Although high-level evidence is currently lacking, noninferiority randomised controlled trials in predefined risk groups in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer are under way to scientifically prove the safety of urinary biomarker-guided follow-up. To facilitate recommendations for clinical use, it is essential to comply with the EU certification for in vitro diagnostics and to demonstrate cost effectiveness.

Background and objective: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists and agonists are cornerstone treatments in prostate cancer. However, evidence regarding the comparative cardiovascular safety of these drugs from clinical trials is inconclusive. The objective of this study was to systematically assess the risk of adverse cardiovascular events of GnRH antagonists compared with GnRH agonists across real-world evidence studies.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science (2008-2023). We included real-world evidence studies comparing the risk of cardiovascular outcomes of GnRH antagonists with those of GnRH agonists among patients with prostate cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of effect estimates across studies at a low or moderate risk of bias, assessed via the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, using random-effect models.

Key findings and limitations: Among ten included studies, four were classified as having a moderate and six as having a serious risk of bias. Across three studies at a moderate risk of bias in the primary analysis, degarelix was associated with an increased risk (pooled relative risk [RR]: 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.51) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). An augmented risk was observed in two studies among patients with a history of cardiovascular disease (pooled RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.11-1.56) compared with one study among patients without a history of cardiovascular disease (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.83-1.59).

Conclusions and clinical implications: Real-world evidence studies indicate that degarelix, compared with GnRH agonists, is associated with a modest increased risk of MACEs, particularly among patients with a history of cardiovascular disease. However, residual confounding due to the treatment of high-risk patients with degarelix may account for these findings. Additional large studies with detailed data on tumor characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors are needed to confirm these findings.

Patient summary: In this systematic evaluation of evidence among patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in routine care, degarelix was associated with higher cardiovascular adverse outcomes than gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.

Background and objective: Active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) is the standard of care for low-grade disease, but there is limited guidance on tailoring protocols for stable patients. We investigated long-term outcomes for patients without initial progression and risk factors for upgrade.

Methods: Men on AS with Gleason grade group (GG) 1 PCa on three serial biopsies, ≥5 yr without progression, and ≥10 yr of follow-up were included. Outcomes were upgrade (GG ≥2), major upgrade (GG ≥3), progression to treatment, metastasis, PCa-specific survival, and overall survival. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the associations between patient characteristics and risk of upgrade.

Key findings and limitations: A total of 774 men met the inclusion criteria. At 10, 12, and 15 yr, upgrade-free survival rates were 56%, 45%, and 21%; major upgrade-free survival rates were 88%, 83%, and 61%; treatment-free survival rates were 86%, 83%, and 73%; metastasis-free survival rates were 99%, 99%, and 98%; and overall survival rates were 98%, 96%, and 95%, respectively. PCa-specific survival was 100% at 15 yr. On a multivariable analysis, year of diagnosis, age, body mass index (BMI), and biopsy core positivity were associated with upgrade (all p < 0.01), whereas age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density were associated with major upgrade.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Patients without progression for 5 yr on AS had modest rates of upgrade and low rates of metastasis, and mortality at 15 yr of follow-up. Year of diagnosis, older age, increased BMI, and increased biopsy core positivity were associated with upgrade, whereas older age and greater PSA density were associated with an increased risk of major upgrade. A subset of these patients may benefit from deintensification of AS protocols.

Patient summary: There are little reported data or clinical guidelines for patients with PCa who are stable for many years on active surveillance (AS). We show, in a large cohort, that PCa patients without progression for 5 yr on AS have modest rates of upgrade and very low rates of metastasis, and mortality rates at 15 yr of follow-up, and that older age, increased body mass index, and increased PCa volume are associated with an increased likelihood of future upgrade. This study supports continued AS in this patient population and deintensification in select patients.