首页 > 最新文献

European urology oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Oncological Outcomes of Trimodal Therapy in Primary Versus Secondary Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. 原发性与继发性肌肉浸润性膀胱癌三模式治疗的肿瘤学结果:一项多中心回顾性研究。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.016
Garvey Mezepo, Zine-Eddine Khene, Jihane Boustani, François Kleinclauss, Magali Quivrin, Yasmine Neftah, Jeremy Mercier, Anne Sophie Bajeot, Celine Mardelli, Benjamin Pradere, Thomas Seisen, Yasser Hammoud, Elodie Bouvier, Hugo Jacquey, Loic Choffel, Thomas Palkowski, Jonathan Khalifa, Ahmed Benyoucef, David Pasquier, Carroline Brassart, Gauthier Marcq, Nazim Khalladi, Alexandre Coutte, Paul Sargos, Constance Huck, Morgan Rouprêt, Mathieu Roumiguie

Background and objective: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) may present de novo (primary MIBC [pMIBC]) or progress from non-muscle-invasive disease (secondary MIBC [sMIBC]). While sMIBC has been associated with adverse outcomes after radical cystectomy, its prognostic impact in patients undergoing trimodal therapy (TMT) is unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes between pMIBC and sMIBC in a multicenter cohort treated with bladder-preserving TMT.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including patients with MIBC treated with curative-intent TMT. Eligible patients had stage ≥T2 disease and completed TMT without discontinuation. Patients were classified as those having pMIBC (≥T2 at diagnosis) or sMIBC (progression after prior non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer [NMIBC]). The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival; the secondary endpoints were metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival, and treatment-related toxicity. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression.

Key findings and limitations: Among 294 patients (234 with pMIBC and 60 with sMIBC), the median age was 77 yr. The median follow-up was 34 mo for pMIBC and 24 mo for sMIBC. The 3-yr CSS rate was 78% for pMIBC and 79% for sMIBC. After adjustment for clinical covariates, sMIBC was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-2.13) and cancer-specific death (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.44-1.76). Toxicities were mostly of grade 1-2; grade ≥3 events were rare. Limitations include the retrospective design, a smaller sMIBC subgroup, and a relatively short follow-up.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Outcomes after TMT were broadly similar between pMIBC and sMIBC, although overall survival was lower in patients with secondary disease. A prior NMIBC history should therefore not preclude consideration of bladder-preserving therapy in appropriately selected patients.

背景和目的:肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)可能表现为新发(原发性MIBC [pMIBC])或非肌肉浸润性疾病(继发性MIBC [sMIBC])的进展。虽然sMIBC与根治性膀胱切除术后的不良结果相关,但其对接受三模治疗(TMT)患者的预后影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是比较pMIBC和sMIBC在一个多中心队列中接受保膀胱TMT治疗的结果。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,包括接受治疗目的TMT治疗的MIBC患者。符合条件的患者为≥T2期疾病,完成TMT治疗且未停药。患者分为pMIBC(诊断时≥T2)或sMIBC(既往非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌[NMIBC]后进展)。主要终点是无复发生存期;次要终点为无转移生存期、癌症特异性生存期(CSS)、总生存期和治疗相关毒性。生存率采用Kaplan-Meier法和多变量Cox回归进行评估。主要发现和局限性:294例患者(234例pMIBC和60例sMIBC)中位年龄为77岁。pMIBC和sMIBC的中位随访时间分别为34个月和24个月。3年的CSS率pMIBC为78%,sMIBC为79%。调整临床协变量后,sMIBC与复发风险增加(风险比[HR] 1.35, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.85-2.13)和癌症特异性死亡(风险比[HR] 0.88, 95% CI 0.44-1.76)无关。毒性以1 ~ 2级为主;≥3级事件罕见。局限性包括回顾性设计、较小的sMIBC亚组和相对较短的随访。结论和临床意义:尽管继发性疾病患者的总生存率较低,但pMIBC和sMIBC患者TMT后的结果大致相似。因此,既往的NMIBC病史不应排除在适当选择的患者中考虑保膀胱治疗。
{"title":"Oncological Outcomes of Trimodal Therapy in Primary Versus Secondary Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.","authors":"Garvey Mezepo, Zine-Eddine Khene, Jihane Boustani, François Kleinclauss, Magali Quivrin, Yasmine Neftah, Jeremy Mercier, Anne Sophie Bajeot, Celine Mardelli, Benjamin Pradere, Thomas Seisen, Yasser Hammoud, Elodie Bouvier, Hugo Jacquey, Loic Choffel, Thomas Palkowski, Jonathan Khalifa, Ahmed Benyoucef, David Pasquier, Carroline Brassart, Gauthier Marcq, Nazim Khalladi, Alexandre Coutte, Paul Sargos, Constance Huck, Morgan Rouprêt, Mathieu Roumiguie","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) may present de novo (primary MIBC [pMIBC]) or progress from non-muscle-invasive disease (secondary MIBC [sMIBC]). While sMIBC has been associated with adverse outcomes after radical cystectomy, its prognostic impact in patients undergoing trimodal therapy (TMT) is unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes between pMIBC and sMIBC in a multicenter cohort treated with bladder-preserving TMT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study including patients with MIBC treated with curative-intent TMT. Eligible patients had stage ≥T2 disease and completed TMT without discontinuation. Patients were classified as those having pMIBC (≥T2 at diagnosis) or sMIBC (progression after prior non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer [NMIBC]). The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival; the secondary endpoints were metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival, and treatment-related toxicity. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Among 294 patients (234 with pMIBC and 60 with sMIBC), the median age was 77 yr. The median follow-up was 34 mo for pMIBC and 24 mo for sMIBC. The 3-yr CSS rate was 78% for pMIBC and 79% for sMIBC. After adjustment for clinical covariates, sMIBC was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-2.13) and cancer-specific death (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.44-1.76). Toxicities were mostly of grade 1-2; grade ≥3 events were rare. Limitations include the retrospective design, a smaller sMIBC subgroup, and a relatively short follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Outcomes after TMT were broadly similar between pMIBC and sMIBC, although overall survival was lower in patients with secondary disease. A prior NMIBC history should therefore not preclude consideration of bladder-preserving therapy in appropriately selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146040529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Re: Stacy Loeb, Mariana Rangel Camacho, Tatiana Sanchez Nolasco, et al. Downstream Impact of Social Media Use and Variable Quality of Online Information About Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2025;8:1648-52. 回复:Stacy Loeb, Mariana Rangel Camacho, Tatiana Sanchez Nolasco等。社交媒体使用的下游影响和前列腺癌在线信息的可变质量。生物学报,2015;8:1648-52。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.019
Rodolfo Montironi, Gianluca Giannarini, Alessia Cimadamore, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Eamonn T Rogers, Liang Cheng
{"title":"Re: Stacy Loeb, Mariana Rangel Camacho, Tatiana Sanchez Nolasco, et al. Downstream Impact of Social Media Use and Variable Quality of Online Information About Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2025;8:1648-52.","authors":"Rodolfo Montironi, Gianluca Giannarini, Alessia Cimadamore, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Eamonn T Rogers, Liang Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146028971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health-related Quality of Life Outcomes of Salvage Metastasis-directed Treatment Versus Elective Nodal Treatment for Oligorecurrent Nodal Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the Phase 2, Open-label PEACE V-STORM Randomized Trial. 针对少复发淋巴结性前列腺癌的挽救性转移导向治疗与选择性淋巴结治疗的健康相关生活质量结果:对2期开放标签PEACE V-STORM随机试验的二次分析
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.01.001
Thomas Zilli, Shankar Siva, Sigmund Brabrand, Piet Dirix, Nick Liefhooghe, François-Xavier Otte, Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga, Wouter Everaerts, Mohamed Shelan, Antonio Conde-Moreno, Fernando López Campos, Alexandros Papachristofilou, Matthias Guckenberger, Marta Scorsetti, Almudena Zapatero, Ana-Elena Villafranca Iturre, Clara Eito, Felipe Couñago, Paolo Muto, Wim Duthoy, Nicolas Mach, Valérie Fonteyne, Daniel Moon, Kristian Thon, Carole Mercier, Vérane Achard, Karin Stellamans, Els Goetghebeur, Dries Reynders, Piet Ost

For prostate cancer patients with metachronous nodal oligorecurrences detected by positron emission tomography, the randomized phase 2 PEACE V-STORM trial (NCT03569241) demonstrated that, compared with metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), elective nodal pelvic radiotherapy (ENRT) in combination with 6 mo of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improved locoregional disease control and metastasis-free survival. In the 190 evaluable patients (MDT: 97 and ENRT: 93) of the 196 randomized in the study, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C-30 and QLQ-PR-25 questionnaires over a 4-yr period as a part of a statistically defined quality of life analysis. During a median follow-up of 50 mo (interquartile range 42-58), QLQ-C30 scores showed no significant differences between MDT and ENRT, except for worse physical functioning at month 24 in the ENRT group (mean decline -7.7 vs -1.3) and worse emotional functioning at month 12 in the MDT group (mean decline 5.8 vs -0.4, p = 0.034). No significant differences in QLQ-PR25 scores were observed, except slightly better bowel symptoms at 18 mo for ENRT, but with no difference before or after. The decline in sexual activity and increase in ADT-related symptoms during the first 6 mo were comparable between arms, returning to baseline by month 12. Consistent with physician-reported treatment-related adverse events, HRQoL analyses show no significant differences between ENRT and MDT.

对于正电子发射断层扫描检测到异时性淋巴结少复发的前列腺癌患者,随机2期PEACE V-STORM试验(NCT03569241)表明,与转移定向治疗(MDT)相比,选择性淋巴结盆腔放疗(ENRT)联合6个月的雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)改善了局部疾病控制和无转移生存。在196名随机纳入研究的可评估患者中,有190名(MDT: 97名,ENRT: 93名)采用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C-30和QLQ-PR-25问卷对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)进行了为期4年的评估,作为统计定义的生活质量分析的一部分。在平均50个月的随访期间(四分位数范围42-58),MDT和ENRT之间的QLQ-C30评分没有显著差异,除了ENRT组在第24个月的身体功能恶化(平均下降-7.7 vs -1.3)和MDT组在第12个月的情绪功能恶化(平均下降5.8 vs -0.4, p = 0.034)。除了ENRT治疗18个月时肠道症状略有改善外,QLQ-PR25评分无显著差异,但前后无差异。在前6个月期间,两组间性活动的减少和adt相关症状的增加具有可比性,到第12个月时恢复到基线水平。与医生报告的治疗相关不良事件一致,HRQoL分析显示ENRT和MDT之间没有显着差异。
{"title":"Health-related Quality of Life Outcomes of Salvage Metastasis-directed Treatment Versus Elective Nodal Treatment for Oligorecurrent Nodal Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the Phase 2, Open-label PEACE V-STORM Randomized Trial.","authors":"Thomas Zilli, Shankar Siva, Sigmund Brabrand, Piet Dirix, Nick Liefhooghe, François-Xavier Otte, Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga, Wouter Everaerts, Mohamed Shelan, Antonio Conde-Moreno, Fernando López Campos, Alexandros Papachristofilou, Matthias Guckenberger, Marta Scorsetti, Almudena Zapatero, Ana-Elena Villafranca Iturre, Clara Eito, Felipe Couñago, Paolo Muto, Wim Duthoy, Nicolas Mach, Valérie Fonteyne, Daniel Moon, Kristian Thon, Carole Mercier, Vérane Achard, Karin Stellamans, Els Goetghebeur, Dries Reynders, Piet Ost","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2026.01.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For prostate cancer patients with metachronous nodal oligorecurrences detected by positron emission tomography, the randomized phase 2 PEACE V-STORM trial (NCT03569241) demonstrated that, compared with metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), elective nodal pelvic radiotherapy (ENRT) in combination with 6 mo of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improved locoregional disease control and metastasis-free survival. In the 190 evaluable patients (MDT: 97 and ENRT: 93) of the 196 randomized in the study, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C-30 and QLQ-PR-25 questionnaires over a 4-yr period as a part of a statistically defined quality of life analysis. During a median follow-up of 50 mo (interquartile range 42-58), QLQ-C30 scores showed no significant differences between MDT and ENRT, except for worse physical functioning at month 24 in the ENRT group (mean decline -7.7 vs -1.3) and worse emotional functioning at month 12 in the MDT group (mean decline 5.8 vs -0.4, p = 0.034). No significant differences in QLQ-PR25 scores were observed, except slightly better bowel symptoms at 18 mo for ENRT, but with no difference before or after. The decline in sexual activity and increase in ADT-related symptoms during the first 6 mo were comparable between arms, returning to baseline by month 12. Consistent with physician-reported treatment-related adverse events, HRQoL analyses show no significant differences between ENRT and MDT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Contemporary or Traditional First-line Therapies: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium. 转移性非透明细胞肾癌患者接受现代或传统一线治疗的结果:来自国际转移性肾癌数据库联盟的结果。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.018
Kosuke Takemura, Jeffrey Graham, David Maj, Martin Zarba, J Connor Wells, Razane El Hajj Chehade, Marc Eid, Eddy Saad, Renee Maria Saliby, Jae-Lyun Lee, Frede Donskov, Benoit Beuselinck, Evon Jude, Rana R McKay, Naveen S Basappa, Sumanta K Pal, Camillo Porta, Neeraj Agarwal, Toni K Choueiri, Daniel Y C Heng

Background and objective: Real-world evidence on the effectiveness of first-line immuno-oncology (IO)-based combinations or cabozantinib (CABO) over traditional targeted therapies in metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is limited. This study aims to compare the outcomes of first-line therapies for metastatic nccRCC according to histologic subtypes, including papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), unclassified RCC, and chromophobe RCC with or without sarcomatoid dedifferentiation.

Methods: Using the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium, patients with metastatic nccRCC who received (1) IO plus vascular endothelial growth factor (IOVE) combination therapy, (2) IOIO doublet therapy, (3) CABO monotherapy, (4) sunitinib or pazopanib (SUN/PAZ) monotherapy, or (5) mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) monotherapy were included. Baseline patient characteristics, clinician assessment of objective response rates (ORRs), and overall survival (OS) were compared across first-line therapy regimens.

Key findings and limitations: The most common nccRCC histology was papillary found in 725 (47%), and sarcomatoid dedifferentiation was found in 236 (15%) of the 1551 patients included. Within the papillary RCC cohort, ORRs and median OS were, respectively, 31% and 33.2 mo for IOVE, 26% and 31.9 mo for IOIO, and 37% and 30.7 mo for CABO, as compared with 13% and 17.2 mo for SUN/PAZ and 3.4% and 13.1 mo for mTOR. Within the sarcomatoid dedifferentiation cohort, receipt of IOIO was associated with the highest ORR and the longest median OS (39.0% and 31.9 mo, respectively).

Conclusions and clinical implications: Distinct patient outcomes were observed across histologic subtypes. More histology-specific strategies are required given the differential activity of first-line therapy regimens against each nccRCC histology.

背景和目的:在转移性非透明细胞肾细胞癌(nccRCC)中,一线免疫肿瘤学(IO)联合治疗或卡博赞替尼(CABO)优于传统靶向治疗的有效性的实际证据有限。本研究旨在根据组织学亚型,包括乳头状肾细胞癌(RCC)、未分类肾细胞癌和伴或不伴肉瘤样去分化的厌色肾细胞癌(RCC),比较转移性nccRCC的一线治疗结果。方法:使用国际转移性肾癌数据库联盟,纳入接受(1)IO +血管内皮生长因子(IOVE)联合治疗,(2)IOIO双重治疗,(3)CABO单药治疗,(4)舒尼替尼或帕唑帕尼(SUN/PAZ)单药治疗,或(5)哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶点(mTOR)单药治疗的转移性nccRCC患者。基线患者特征、临床医生评估的客观缓解率(ORRs)和总生存期(OS)在一线治疗方案中进行了比较。主要发现和局限性:最常见的nccRCC组织学为乳头状,725例(47%),1551例患者中有236例(15%)发现肉瘤样去分化。在乳头状RCC队列中,love组的orr和中位OS分别为31%和33.2个月,IOIO组为26%和31.9个月,CABO组为37%和30.7个月,而SUN/PAZ组为13%和17.2个月,mTOR组为3.4%和13.1个月。在肉瘤样去分化队列中,接受IOIO与最高的ORR和最长的中位OS相关(分别为39.0%和31.9个月)。结论和临床意义:不同的组织学亚型观察到不同的患者结局。考虑到一线治疗方案对每种nccRCC组织的不同活性,需要更多的组织学特异性策略。
{"title":"Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Contemporary or Traditional First-line Therapies: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium.","authors":"Kosuke Takemura, Jeffrey Graham, David Maj, Martin Zarba, J Connor Wells, Razane El Hajj Chehade, Marc Eid, Eddy Saad, Renee Maria Saliby, Jae-Lyun Lee, Frede Donskov, Benoit Beuselinck, Evon Jude, Rana R McKay, Naveen S Basappa, Sumanta K Pal, Camillo Porta, Neeraj Agarwal, Toni K Choueiri, Daniel Y C Heng","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Real-world evidence on the effectiveness of first-line immuno-oncology (IO)-based combinations or cabozantinib (CABO) over traditional targeted therapies in metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is limited. This study aims to compare the outcomes of first-line therapies for metastatic nccRCC according to histologic subtypes, including papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), unclassified RCC, and chromophobe RCC with or without sarcomatoid dedifferentiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium, patients with metastatic nccRCC who received (1) IO plus vascular endothelial growth factor (IOVE) combination therapy, (2) IOIO doublet therapy, (3) CABO monotherapy, (4) sunitinib or pazopanib (SUN/PAZ) monotherapy, or (5) mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) monotherapy were included. Baseline patient characteristics, clinician assessment of objective response rates (ORRs), and overall survival (OS) were compared across first-line therapy regimens.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The most common nccRCC histology was papillary found in 725 (47%), and sarcomatoid dedifferentiation was found in 236 (15%) of the 1551 patients included. Within the papillary RCC cohort, ORRs and median OS were, respectively, 31% and 33.2 mo for IOVE, 26% and 31.9 mo for IOIO, and 37% and 30.7 mo for CABO, as compared with 13% and 17.2 mo for SUN/PAZ and 3.4% and 13.1 mo for mTOR. Within the sarcomatoid dedifferentiation cohort, receipt of IOIO was associated with the highest ORR and the longest median OS (39.0% and 31.9 mo, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Distinct patient outcomes were observed across histologic subtypes. More histology-specific strategies are required given the differential activity of first-line therapy regimens against each nccRCC histology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to Matthias May, Ingmar Wolff, Sabine Brookman-May, and Maximilian Burger's Letter to the Editor re: Paramananthan Mariappan, Jasmin Hart-Brooke, Rebecca Sparks, Tanya Lord-McKenzie. Bladder EpiCheck Triggered Photodynamic Diagnosis Biopsies Detect High-grade Bladder Cancer Recurrences Missed by White Light Cystoscopy. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.11.007. 回复Matthias May, Ingmar Wolff, Sabine Brookman-May和Maximilian Burger给编辑的信:Paramananthan Mariappan, Jasmin Hart-Brooke, Rebecca Sparks, Tanya Lord-McKenzie。膀胱上皮检查触发光动力诊断活检检测白光膀胱镜检查未发现的高级别膀胱癌复发。Eur Eur Eur Eur Eur。在出版社。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.11.007。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.017
Paramananthan Mariappan, Jasmin Hart-Brooke, Rebecca Sparks, Tanya Lord-McKenzie
{"title":"Reply to Matthias May, Ingmar Wolff, Sabine Brookman-May, and Maximilian Burger's Letter to the Editor re: Paramananthan Mariappan, Jasmin Hart-Brooke, Rebecca Sparks, Tanya Lord-McKenzie. Bladder EpiCheck Triggered Photodynamic Diagnosis Biopsies Detect High-grade Bladder Cancer Recurrences Missed by White Light Cystoscopy. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.11.007.","authors":"Paramananthan Mariappan, Jasmin Hart-Brooke, Rebecca Sparks, Tanya Lord-McKenzie","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Living with a Prostate Cancer Patient: Real-world Evidence from the Europa Uomo Prostate Cancer Partners in Europe Research Study. 与前列腺癌患者一起生活:来自欧洲研究研究中Europa Uomo前列腺癌合作伙伴的真实证据。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.014
Lionne D F Venderbos, Sebastiaan Remmers, André Deschamps, Irma Boogh, Tania Estape, Ernst-Günther Carl, Nuno Pereira Azevedo, Monique J Roobol

Background and objective: Partners of prostate cancer (PCa) patients may play an important role in the care process. Therefore, Europa Uomo initiated the Europa Uomo Prostate cancer Partners in Europe Research (EU-ProPER) study to study the partner's perspective. The study aims to assess the quality of life of partners of PCa patients, and the impact of a PCa diagnosis and its subsequent treatment on the partner.

Methods: Based on information of the PCa-partner program of the annual Dutch PCa Foundation meetings and expert input, a partner survey was developed. The survey includes themes on communication, relationship, social functioning, and general health (12-item Short Form Health Survey v2) of the partner, and the impact of urinary incontinence (UI) and sexual dysfunction (SD). The EU-ProPER survey was pretested in 16 partners and was available online in 17 languages.

Key findings and limitations: Between October 9 and Dec 31, 2023, 1135 partners completed the survey. The median age at completion was 68 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 62-73); it was 61 yr (IQR 55-67) at the time of diagnosis. Of the partners, 89% can openly talk about PCa to their partner and 73% feels that communication has not gotten worsen since the PCa diagnosis. Communication about UI and SD is more private. Regarding communication with health care professionals, PCa patients and partners are more often informed about UI (66%) than about intimacy/SD (20-24%). Most partners feel, however, that information about sexuality should be provided upfront to both the PCa patient and the partner (87%).

Conclusions and clinical implications: Europa Uomo has engaged an unprecedented number of partners of PCa patients. Communication is an important topic in which intimate topics such as UI and SD are more private. Communication with health care professionals about intimacy/sexuality is currently suboptimal and needs to be improved.

背景与目的:前列腺癌(PCa)患者的伴侣可能在护理过程中发挥重要作用。因此,Europa Uomo发起了Europa Uomo前列腺癌合作伙伴在欧洲研究(EU-ProPER)研究,以研究合作伙伴的观点。本研究旨在评估前列腺癌患者伴侣的生活质量,以及前列腺癌诊断及其后续治疗对伴侣的影响。方法:根据荷兰PCa基金会年度会议的PCa-partner计划信息和专家意见,制定了一项合作伙伴调查。调查的主题包括伴侣的沟通、关系、社会功能和一般健康(12项健康调查v2),以及尿失禁(UI)和性功能障碍(SD)的影响。EU-ProPER调查在16个合作伙伴中进行了预测试,并以17种语言在线提供。主要发现和局限性:在2023年10月9日至12月31日期间,1135名合作伙伴完成了调查。完成时的中位年龄为68岁(四分位数间距[IQR] 62-73);确诊时为61岁(IQR 55-67)。在伴侣中,89%的人可以公开地与伴侣谈论PCa, 73%的人认为自PCa诊断以来沟通并没有恶化。关于UI和SD的通信更加私密。在与卫生保健专业人员的沟通方面,PCa患者和伴侣更经常被告知UI(66%),而不是亲密/SD(20-24%)。然而,大多数伴侣认为,性行为的信息应该预先提供给PCa患者和伴侣(87%)。结论和临床意义:Europa Uomo为PCa患者提供了前所未有的合作伙伴。沟通是一个很重要的话题,其中UI和SD等亲密话题更加私密。与卫生保健专业人员就亲密关系/性行为的沟通目前是次优的,需要改进。
{"title":"Living with a Prostate Cancer Patient: Real-world Evidence from the Europa Uomo Prostate Cancer Partners in Europe Research Study.","authors":"Lionne D F Venderbos, Sebastiaan Remmers, André Deschamps, Irma Boogh, Tania Estape, Ernst-Günther Carl, Nuno Pereira Azevedo, Monique J Roobol","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Partners of prostate cancer (PCa) patients may play an important role in the care process. Therefore, Europa Uomo initiated the Europa Uomo Prostate cancer Partners in Europe Research (EU-ProPER) study to study the partner's perspective. The study aims to assess the quality of life of partners of PCa patients, and the impact of a PCa diagnosis and its subsequent treatment on the partner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on information of the PCa-partner program of the annual Dutch PCa Foundation meetings and expert input, a partner survey was developed. The survey includes themes on communication, relationship, social functioning, and general health (12-item Short Form Health Survey v2) of the partner, and the impact of urinary incontinence (UI) and sexual dysfunction (SD). The EU-ProPER survey was pretested in 16 partners and was available online in 17 languages.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Between October 9 and Dec 31, 2023, 1135 partners completed the survey. The median age at completion was 68 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 62-73); it was 61 yr (IQR 55-67) at the time of diagnosis. Of the partners, 89% can openly talk about PCa to their partner and 73% feels that communication has not gotten worsen since the PCa diagnosis. Communication about UI and SD is more private. Regarding communication with health care professionals, PCa patients and partners are more often informed about UI (66%) than about intimacy/SD (20-24%). Most partners feel, however, that information about sexuality should be provided upfront to both the PCa patient and the partner (87%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Europa Uomo has engaged an unprecedented number of partners of PCa patients. Communication is an important topic in which intimate topics such as UI and SD are more private. Communication with health care professionals about intimacy/sexuality is currently suboptimal and needs to be improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145951745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Best Practice in Preoperative Surgical Planning for Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A European Consensus Statement. 机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术术前手术计划的最佳实践:欧洲共识声明。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.008
Elizabeth Day, Anders Bjartell, Ashwin Sridhar, Bhavan Rai, Christian Wagner, Declan Cahill, Derya Tilki, Erdem Canda, Francesco Sanguedolce, Giorgio Gandaglia, Guillaume Ploussard, Jochen Walz, Roderick van den Bergh, Ruben De Groote, Tobias Gross, Prabhakar Rajan, Louise Dickinson, Zafer Tandogdu

Background and objective: The surgical plan in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) aims to achieve optimal perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes by recommending the extent of resection and use of function sparing techniques. However, there is a lack in high-level evidence on the optimal process to define the plan preoperatively. We therefore undertook a consensus exercise to develop the best practice statement to supplement evidence-based guidelines.

Methods: A consensus exercise was undertaken using a modified RAND/University of California Los Angeles approach. Consensus was a priori defined as ≥75% agreement/disagreement. A total of 101 statements were developed by the steering group based on a previously published systematic review and were reviewed in three rounds by 14 panellists.

Key findings and limitations: Overall, 73 statements reached consensus and 34 reached consensus across six domains. The process concluded that a preoperative surgical plan is essential prior to undertaking any RARP and will facilitate the optimal execution of surgery, as it provides the best available information to the surgeon to refine the technique and potentially improve oncological, functional, and perioperative outcomes.

Conclusions and clinical implications: The consensus statements draw out the best practices in the surgical planning process and can assist surgeons in standardising their approach. Gaps (areas of nonconsensus) have also been identified that can direct future work.

背景和目的:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的手术计划旨在通过推荐切除范围和功能保留技术的使用来实现最佳的围手术期、肿瘤和功能预后。然而,缺乏关于术前确定计划的最佳过程的高水平证据。因此,我们进行了协商一致的工作,制定最佳做法声明,以补充以证据为基础的指导方针。方法:采用改进的兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校方法进行共识练习。共识被先验地定义为≥75%的同意/不同意。指导小组根据以前发表的一份系统审查编写了101份声明,并由14名小组成员分三轮审查。主要发现和局限性:总体而言,73项声明达成共识,34项声明在六个领域达成共识。该过程得出结论,术前手术计划在进行任何RARP之前是必不可少的,它将促进手术的最佳执行,因为它为外科医生提供了最佳的可用信息,以改进技术,并可能改善肿瘤,功能和围手术期结果。结论和临床意义:共识声明勾勒出手术计划过程中的最佳实践,并可以帮助外科医生标准化他们的方法。还确定了可以指导未来工作的差距(未达成共识的领域)。
{"title":"Best Practice in Preoperative Surgical Planning for Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A European Consensus Statement.","authors":"Elizabeth Day, Anders Bjartell, Ashwin Sridhar, Bhavan Rai, Christian Wagner, Declan Cahill, Derya Tilki, Erdem Canda, Francesco Sanguedolce, Giorgio Gandaglia, Guillaume Ploussard, Jochen Walz, Roderick van den Bergh, Ruben De Groote, Tobias Gross, Prabhakar Rajan, Louise Dickinson, Zafer Tandogdu","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The surgical plan in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) aims to achieve optimal perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes by recommending the extent of resection and use of function sparing techniques. However, there is a lack in high-level evidence on the optimal process to define the plan preoperatively. We therefore undertook a consensus exercise to develop the best practice statement to supplement evidence-based guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consensus exercise was undertaken using a modified RAND/University of California Los Angeles approach. Consensus was a priori defined as ≥75% agreement/disagreement. A total of 101 statements were developed by the steering group based on a previously published systematic review and were reviewed in three rounds by 14 panellists.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Overall, 73 statements reached consensus and 34 reached consensus across six domains. The process concluded that a preoperative surgical plan is essential prior to undertaking any RARP and will facilitate the optimal execution of surgery, as it provides the best available information to the surgeon to refine the technique and potentially improve oncological, functional, and perioperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The consensus statements draw out the best practices in the surgical planning process and can assist surgeons in standardising their approach. Gaps (areas of nonconsensus) have also been identified that can direct future work.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145943031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of Causal and Noncausal Components of Screening on Prostate Cancer Mortality: A Mediation Analysis from the Dutch, Finnish, and Swedish Centers of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. 前列腺癌筛查的因果和非因果因素对死亡率的影响:来自荷兰、芬兰和瑞典欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究中心的中介分析。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.004
Sebastiaan Remmers, Kirsi Talala, Monique J Roobol, Jonas Hugosson, Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman, Daan Nieboer, Anssi Auvinen

Background and objective: The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has shown that prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening reduces prostate cancer (PCa)-specific mortality (PCSM). However, the mediating role of a stage shift and curative treatment in the causal pathway from screening to reduced PCSM has not been elucidated.

Methods: In the ERSPC trial, men were randomly allocated to either a screening arm, with regular PSA measurements, or a control arm. During 16-yr follow-up, 8046 men from Finland, 3701 from the Netherlands, and 1382 from Sweden were diagnosed with PCa and were aged 55-69 yr at the time of randomization. A directed acyclic graph was used to define the impact of screening on the PCa-specific restricted mean survival time (RMST) after randomization, mediated by risk group and treatment at diagnosis.

Key findings and limitations: The absolute increase in RMST over 16 yr for men in the screening arm versus the control arm was 0.13 yr (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.22) in Finland, 0.48 yr (95% CI 0.24-0.62) in the Netherlands, and 0.44 yr (95% CI 0.22-0.68) in Sweden. This effect was mainly attributable to risk group at diagnosis, and not through treatment at the time of diagnosis. A limitation of the study is that we only included the three largest ERSPC centers.

Conclusions and clinical implication: The reduced PCSM achieved by early PCa detection via PSA-based screening is caused by more favorable prognostic features and subsequent improved treatment outcomes. Our findings confirm that the observed results are a causal effect of screening.

背景与目的:欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)表明,基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的筛查可降低前列腺癌(PCa)特异性死亡率(PCSM)。然而,从筛查到减少PCSM的因果途径中,阶段转移和治疗的中介作用尚未阐明。方法:在ERSPC试验中,男性被随机分配到常规PSA测量的筛查组或对照组。在16年的随访中,8046名芬兰男性、3701名荷兰男性和1382名瑞典男性被诊断为前列腺癌,随机分组时年龄在55-69岁之间。使用有向无环图来定义随机化后筛查对pca特异性受限平均生存时间(RMST)的影响,由风险组和诊断时的治疗介导。主要发现和局限性:与对照组相比,筛查组16年以上男性RMST的绝对增加在芬兰为0.13年(95%可信区间[CI] 0.05-0.22),荷兰为0.48年(95% CI 0.24-0.62),瑞典为0.44年(95% CI 0.22-0.68)。这种影响主要归因于诊断时的风险组,而不是通过诊断时的治疗。这项研究的一个局限性是我们只包括了三个最大的ERSPC中心。结论和临床意义:通过基于psa的筛查早期发现前列腺癌所获得的PCSM降低是由于更有利的预后特征和随后改善的治疗结果。我们的研究结果证实,观察到的结果是筛查的因果效应。
{"title":"Effects of Causal and Noncausal Components of Screening on Prostate Cancer Mortality: A Mediation Analysis from the Dutch, Finnish, and Swedish Centers of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Sebastiaan Remmers, Kirsi Talala, Monique J Roobol, Jonas Hugosson, Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman, Daan Nieboer, Anssi Auvinen","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has shown that prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening reduces prostate cancer (PCa)-specific mortality (PCSM). However, the mediating role of a stage shift and curative treatment in the causal pathway from screening to reduced PCSM has not been elucidated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the ERSPC trial, men were randomly allocated to either a screening arm, with regular PSA measurements, or a control arm. During 16-yr follow-up, 8046 men from Finland, 3701 from the Netherlands, and 1382 from Sweden were diagnosed with PCa and were aged 55-69 yr at the time of randomization. A directed acyclic graph was used to define the impact of screening on the PCa-specific restricted mean survival time (RMST) after randomization, mediated by risk group and treatment at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The absolute increase in RMST over 16 yr for men in the screening arm versus the control arm was 0.13 yr (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.22) in Finland, 0.48 yr (95% CI 0.24-0.62) in the Netherlands, and 0.44 yr (95% CI 0.22-0.68) in Sweden. This effect was mainly attributable to risk group at diagnosis, and not through treatment at the time of diagnosis. A limitation of the study is that we only included the three largest ERSPC centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implication: </strong>The reduced PCSM achieved by early PCa detection via PSA-based screening is caused by more favorable prognostic features and subsequent improved treatment outcomes. Our findings confirm that the observed results are a causal effect of screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145932404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Re: Paramananthan Mariappan, Jasmin Hart-Brooke, Rebecca Sparks, Tanya Lord-McKenzie. Bladder EpiCheck Triggered Photodynamic Diagnosis Biopsies Detect High-grade Bladder Cancer Recurrences Missed by White Light Cystoscopy. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.11.007. 回复:Paramananthan Mariappan, Jasmin Hart-Brooke, Rebecca Sparks, Tanya Lord-McKenzie。膀胱上皮检查触发光动力诊断活检检测白光膀胱镜检查未发现的高级别膀胱癌复发。Eur Eur Eur Eur Eur。在出版社。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.11.007。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.014
Matthias May, Ingmar Wolff, Sabine Brookman-May, Maximilian Burger
{"title":"Re: Paramananthan Mariappan, Jasmin Hart-Brooke, Rebecca Sparks, Tanya Lord-McKenzie. Bladder EpiCheck Triggered Photodynamic Diagnosis Biopsies Detect High-grade Bladder Cancer Recurrences Missed by White Light Cystoscopy. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.11.007.","authors":"Matthias May, Ingmar Wolff, Sabine Brookman-May, Maximilian Burger","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stereotactic Radiation for Systemic Therapy-naïve Oligometastatic Kidney Cancer: Final Results of a Phase 2b Trial. 立体定向放射治疗系统性Therapy-naïve少转移性肾癌:2b期试验的最终结果。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.007
Raquibul Hannan, Ryan Assadi, Alana Christie, Varsha Puliyadi, Aurelie Garant, Hans Hammers, Waddah Arafat, Kevin Courtney, David Sher, Chul Ahn, Suzanne Cole, James Brugarolas, Robert Timmerman

Background and objective: Management of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (omRCC) remains undefined, especially in favorable- and intermediate-risk patients, in whom treatment de-escalation may reduce toxicity and preserve quality of life. This study aims to evaluate sequential stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) as first-line therapy in systemic therapy-naïve patients with omRCC.

Methods: A prospective, single-arm, phase 2b trial enrolled systemic therapy-naïve renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with three or fewer extracranial metastases, all treated with SAbR to all sites. The primary endpoint was to measure the percentage of patients with time to systemic therapy (TTST) >1 yr. Modified progression-free survival (mPFS) was defined as the earliest time of developing one of the following predefined criteria for local therapy escalation: more than three new metastases, more than six total metastases, local failure at an SAbR-treated site, brain metastases, or lesions not amenable to SAbR. The secondary endpoints included mPFS, progression-free survival on subsequent therapy, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), local control, toxicity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Key findings and limitations: Twenty-three patients received SAbR to 69 lesions. The median follow-up was 45 mo. TTST >1 yr was achieved in 91% of patients; the median TTST was 55.6 mo. The median mPFS was 40 mo. Local control was 100%. The 3-yr OS and CSS rates were 68.7% and 87.0%, respectively. One patient developed grade 3 colitis possibly related to SAbR, progressing to grade 5 following immunotherapy. HRQoL remained stable. Single-arm design limits causal inference and generalizability.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Sequential SAbR achieved durable disease control and was not associated with significant changes in patient-reported quality of life, supporting a survivorship-centered, de-escalation strategy that avoids early systemic therapy in selected omRCC patients.

背景和目的:寡转移性肾细胞癌(omRCC)的治疗仍不明确,特别是在有利和中等风险患者中,治疗降级可能降低毒性并保持生活质量。本研究旨在评估顺序立体定向消融放疗(SAbR)作为全身性therapy-naïve omRCC患者的一线治疗。方法:一项前瞻性,单臂,2b期试验,纳入系统性therapy-naïve肾细胞癌(RCC)患者,患者有三个或更少的颅外转移,所有患者均接受SAbR治疗。主要终点是测量患者接受全身治疗时间(TTST)的百分比。改良无进展生存期(mPFS)被定义为出现以下预先定义的局部治疗升级标准之一的最早时间:超过3个新转移,超过6个总转移,SAbR治疗部位局部失败,脑转移,或不适用于SAbR的病变。次要终点包括mPFS、后续治疗的无进展生存期、总生存期(OS)、癌症特异性生存期(CSS)、局部控制、毒性和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。主要发现和局限性:23例患者接受了69个病灶的SAbR治疗。中位随访时间为45个月。91%的患者达到了10年的TTST;中位TTST为55.6个月,中位mPFS为40个月,局部控制率为100%。3年OS和CSS率分别为68.7%和87.0%。1例患者发展为可能与SAbR相关的3级结肠炎,在免疫治疗后进展为5级。HRQoL保持稳定。单臂设计限制了因果推理和推广。结论和临床意义:序贯SAbR实现了持久的疾病控制,并且与患者报告的生活质量的显着变化无关,支持以生存为中心的降级策略,避免了对选定的omRCC患者进行早期全身治疗。
{"title":"Stereotactic Radiation for Systemic Therapy-naïve Oligometastatic Kidney Cancer: Final Results of a Phase 2b Trial.","authors":"Raquibul Hannan, Ryan Assadi, Alana Christie, Varsha Puliyadi, Aurelie Garant, Hans Hammers, Waddah Arafat, Kevin Courtney, David Sher, Chul Ahn, Suzanne Cole, James Brugarolas, Robert Timmerman","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.12.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Management of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (omRCC) remains undefined, especially in favorable- and intermediate-risk patients, in whom treatment de-escalation may reduce toxicity and preserve quality of life. This study aims to evaluate sequential stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) as first-line therapy in systemic therapy-naïve patients with omRCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-arm, phase 2b trial enrolled systemic therapy-naïve renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with three or fewer extracranial metastases, all treated with SAbR to all sites. The primary endpoint was to measure the percentage of patients with time to systemic therapy (TTST) >1 yr. Modified progression-free survival (mPFS) was defined as the earliest time of developing one of the following predefined criteria for local therapy escalation: more than three new metastases, more than six total metastases, local failure at an SAbR-treated site, brain metastases, or lesions not amenable to SAbR. The secondary endpoints included mPFS, progression-free survival on subsequent therapy, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), local control, toxicity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Twenty-three patients received SAbR to 69 lesions. The median follow-up was 45 mo. TTST >1 yr was achieved in 91% of patients; the median TTST was 55.6 mo. The median mPFS was 40 mo. Local control was 100%. The 3-yr OS and CSS rates were 68.7% and 87.0%, respectively. One patient developed grade 3 colitis possibly related to SAbR, progressing to grade 5 following immunotherapy. HRQoL remained stable. Single-arm design limits causal inference and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Sequential SAbR achieved durable disease control and was not associated with significant changes in patient-reported quality of life, supporting a survivorship-centered, de-escalation strategy that avoids early systemic therapy in selected omRCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European urology oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1