Pub Date : 2025-04-01DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2486304
Leonidas Mavroeidis, Foteini Kalofonou, Ruth Casey, Andrea Napolitano, Ramesh Bulusu, Robin L Jones
Introduction: A subset of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) lacks the common mutations in KIT/PDGFRa genes. This is a rare and heterogeneous group of challenging GISTs due to their diversity and absence of sensitivity to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib.
Areas covered: In this manscript, we review the pathogenesis, natural history, diagnostic features and management of KIT/PDGFRa wild-type (WT) GISTs, including SDH-deficient GISTs, GISTs with mutations in the RAS/RAF pathway, and quadruple WT GISTs which lack mutations in either KIT/PDGFRa and SDH genes or components of the RAS/RAF pathway, and syndromic GISTs as well as GISTs with rare KIT/PDGFRa mutations.
Expert opinion: Patients should be managed in reference centers. There has been progress in the understanding of the biology of these GISTs, and promising therapeutic targets have been identified. In SDH-deficient GISTs, the TKI olverembatinib has shown encouraging clinical activity but requires further clinical validation, while the HIF2a inhibitor bezultifan and temozolomide alone or in combination with the death receptor agonist 5 are under clinical investigation. Targeting the RAS/RAF pathway in RAS/RAF-mutated GISTs warrants evaluation in clinical trials. Rare molecular alterations in quadruple WT GISTs require investigation for their oncogenic potential. Collaborative research and patient advocacy is critical for these extremely rare tumors.
{"title":"Identifying and managing rare subtypes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.","authors":"Leonidas Mavroeidis, Foteini Kalofonou, Ruth Casey, Andrea Napolitano, Ramesh Bulusu, Robin L Jones","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2486304","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2486304","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A subset of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) lacks the common mutations in <i>KIT/PDGFRa</i> genes. This is a rare and heterogeneous group of challenging GISTs due to their diversity and absence of sensitivity to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this manscript, we review the pathogenesis, natural history, diagnostic features and management of <i>KIT/PDGFRa</i> wild-type (WT) GISTs, including SDH-deficient GISTs, GISTs with mutations in the RAS/RAF pathway, and quadruple WT GISTs which lack mutations in either <i>KIT/PDGFRa</i> and <i>SDH</i> genes or components of the RAS/RAF pathway, and syndromic GISTs as well as GISTs with rare <i>KIT/PDGFRa</i> mutations.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Patients should be managed in reference centers. There has been progress in the understanding of the biology of these GISTs, and promising therapeutic targets have been identified. In SDH-deficient GISTs, the TKI olverembatinib has shown encouraging clinical activity but requires further clinical validation, while the HIF2a inhibitor bezultifan and temozolomide alone or in combination with the death receptor agonist 5 are under clinical investigation. Targeting the RAS/RAF pathway in RAS/RAF-mutated GISTs warrants evaluation in clinical trials. Rare molecular alterations in quadruple WT GISTs require investigation for their oncogenic potential. Collaborative research and patient advocacy is critical for these extremely rare tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"549-561"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143742693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-05-01DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2493867
Abdulsalam I Aliyu, Ryo Katsumata, Hans Törnblom, Magnus Simrén
Introduction: Measurement of gastrointestinal (GI) transit is increasingly becoming a valuable tool in understanding the pathophysiology of symptoms of many digestive diseases, including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The objective of this article is to review the relevance of GI transit abnormalities for symptoms of IBS. These abnormalities relate to gastric emptying, small bowel transit, and colonic transit (whole gut transit).
Areas covered: The article briefly describes the current methods of assessment, factors that influence the result of these methods and the relationship of abnormalities of GI transit with symptoms that have been reported in IBS patients. Finally, a recommendation to guide the application of transit studies in IBS in both clinical practice and research is provided.
Expert opinion: Gastrointestinal transit is relevant to symptoms of bowel habits (stool frequency and form) and the relevance for other GI symptoms in IBS is not straightforward and needs further characterization. Intervention studies in IBS that incorporate objective measures of gut transit alongside symptom evaluation are warranted. Incorporating artificial intelligence into the methods of measuring transit could improve accuracy and simplify the measurements.
{"title":"Gastrointestinal transit abnormalities in irritable bowel syndrome and their relation to symptoms.","authors":"Abdulsalam I Aliyu, Ryo Katsumata, Hans Törnblom, Magnus Simrén","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2493867","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2493867","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Measurement of gastrointestinal (GI) transit is increasingly becoming a valuable tool in understanding the pathophysiology of symptoms of many digestive diseases, including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The objective of this article is to review the relevance of GI transit abnormalities for symptoms of IBS. These abnormalities relate to gastric emptying, small bowel transit, and colonic transit (whole gut transit).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The article briefly describes the current methods of assessment, factors that influence the result of these methods and the relationship of abnormalities of GI transit with symptoms that have been reported in IBS patients. Finally, a recommendation to guide the application of transit studies in IBS in both clinical practice and research is provided.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Gastrointestinal transit is relevant to symptoms of bowel habits (stool frequency and form) and the relevance for other GI symptoms in IBS is not straightforward and needs further characterization. Intervention studies in IBS that incorporate objective measures of gut transit alongside symptom evaluation are warranted. Incorporating artificial intelligence into the methods of measuring transit could improve accuracy and simplify the measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"447-454"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143960771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-04-25DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2495080
Kenneth S H Chok, Tiffany Y T Joeng, Darren M C Poon
Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer. Photon radiotherapy shows efficacy in treating HCC but carries risks of high exit dose and radiation-induced liver disease. Additionally, HCCs with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) have a poor prognosis and are associated with higher risk of death. In recent years, proton beam therapy (PBT) has emerged as a novel treatment with the ability to downstage HCC for liver transplant (LT).
Areas covered: This review will provide an overview of dosimetric benefits of PBT, efficacy of PBT in treating HCC, downstaging HCC-PVTT for LT, and a comparison of PBT with other non-surgical techniques. A search of PubMed until 3 September 2024 was conducted using free search and the following keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, proton beam therapy, portal vein tumor thrombosis, local ablative therapy, trans-arterial chemoembolization, stereotactic body radiotherapy, Y-90 radioembolization.
Expert opinion: Various clinical trials using PBT have shown promising tumor local control and overall survival rates. PBT is mostly safe and efficacious for downstaging HCC-PVTT for LT. PBT has also been shown to be non-inferior to various other treatment modalities. Future research should focus on combinations of PBT with other modalities.
{"title":"Proton beam therapy in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Kenneth S H Chok, Tiffany Y T Joeng, Darren M C Poon","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2495080","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2495080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer. Photon radiotherapy shows efficacy in treating HCC but carries risks of high exit dose and radiation-induced liver disease. Additionally, HCCs with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) have a poor prognosis and are associated with higher risk of death. In recent years, proton beam therapy (PBT) has emerged as a novel treatment with the ability to downstage HCC for liver transplant (LT).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review will provide an overview of dosimetric benefits of PBT, efficacy of PBT in treating HCC, downstaging HCC-PVTT for LT, and a comparison of PBT with other non-surgical techniques. A search of PubMed until 3 September 2024 was conducted using free search and the following keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, proton beam therapy, portal vein tumor thrombosis, local ablative therapy, trans-arterial chemoembolization, stereotactic body radiotherapy, Y-90 radioembolization.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Various clinical trials using PBT have shown promising tumor local control and overall survival rates. PBT is mostly safe and efficacious for downstaging HCC-PVTT for LT. PBT has also been shown to be non-inferior to various other treatment modalities. Future research should focus on combinations of PBT with other modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"495-504"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143992287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-04-10DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2488887
Richard K Russell, Andrew Fagbemi, Jalil Benyacoub, Maria E Capobianco, Laura E Wells, Rita Shergill-Bonner, Preeti Sharma, Minal Patel
Introduction: This systematic literature review (SLR) aims to compare the clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes associated with specialized and standard nutritional formulas for the treatment of mild-to-moderate pediatric Crohn's disease.
Methods: Search strategies were applied across MEDLINE, Cochrane and Web of Science (January 2000-October 2023) and recent congress proceedings (January 2021-October 2023). PRISMA-P guidelines were followed. Quality assessment evaluated risk of bias.
Results: Twenty-three unique studies met the inclusion criteria. Nineteen studies (754 patients) evaluated specialized formula, 10 assessed standard formula (246 patients). Mucosal healing (7 studies), induction (20 studies) and maintenance of remission (9 studies) were reported over various timeframes. High proportions of patients who received specialized formula achieved mucosal healing (63-89% 8 weeks; 25-74% 10 weeks), and remission (50-100% 8 weeks). Specialized formula sustained remission (34-62.5% 6 months and 24-87.5% 1 year). Results were not directly comparable with standard formula due to significant heterogeneity in study methodology, patient populations, and remission definition.
Conclusions: The evidence predominantly supports the benefits of specialized formula in inducing mucosal healing, remission, and sustaining positive outcomes across multiple timepoints. Direct comparison of nutritional interventions is required to further support the findings of this SLR.Protocol registration: PROSPERO CRD42023472370.
本系统文献综述(SLR)旨在比较专业和标准营养配方治疗轻度至中度儿童克罗恩病的临床、人文和经济结果。方法:检索策略应用于MEDLINE、Cochrane和Web of Science(2000年1月- 2023年10月)和最近的国会会议论文集(2021年1月- 2023年10月)。遵循PRISMA-P指南。质量评价评价偏倚风险。结果:23项独特的研究符合纳入标准。19项研究(754例患者)评估了专业配方,10项研究(246例患者)评估了标准配方。粘膜愈合(7项研究)、诱导(20项研究)和维持缓解(9项研究)在不同的时间框架内进行了报道。接受专门配方治疗的患者粘膜愈合的比例较高(63-89%,8周);10周25-74%),缓解(8周50-100%)。特殊配方持续缓解(6个月34-62.5%,1年24-87.5%)。由于研究方法、患者群体和缓解定义的显著异质性,结果不能与标准公式直接比较。结论:证据主要支持专用配方在诱导粘膜愈合、缓解和维持多个时间点的积极结果方面的益处。需要对营养干预措施进行直接比较,以进一步支持该SLR的研究结果。协议注册:PROSPERO CRD42023472370。
{"title":"Specialized and standard nutritional formulas for the dietary management of pediatric patients with Crohn's disease: a systematic literature review.","authors":"Richard K Russell, Andrew Fagbemi, Jalil Benyacoub, Maria E Capobianco, Laura E Wells, Rita Shergill-Bonner, Preeti Sharma, Minal Patel","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2488887","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2488887","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic literature review (SLR) aims to compare the clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes associated with specialized and standard nutritional formulas for the treatment of mild-to-moderate pediatric Crohn's disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search strategies were applied across MEDLINE, Cochrane and Web of Science (January 2000-October 2023) and recent congress proceedings (January 2021-October 2023). PRISMA-P guidelines were followed. Quality assessment evaluated risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three unique studies met the inclusion criteria. Nineteen studies (754 patients) evaluated specialized formula, 10 assessed standard formula (246 patients). Mucosal healing (7 studies), induction (20 studies) and maintenance of remission (9 studies) were reported over various timeframes. High proportions of patients who received specialized formula achieved mucosal healing (63-89% 8 weeks; 25-74% 10 weeks), and remission (50-100% 8 weeks). Specialized formula sustained remission (34-62.5% 6 months and 24-87.5% 1 year). Results were not directly comparable with standard formula due to significant heterogeneity in study methodology, patient populations, and remission definition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evidence predominantly supports the benefits of specialized formula in inducing mucosal healing, remission, and sustaining positive outcomes across multiple timepoints. Direct comparison of nutritional interventions is required to further support the findings of this SLR.<b>Protocol registration:</b> PROSPERO CRD42023472370.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"455-465"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143803003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-03-25DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2482980
Robert B Varley, James C Lee
Introduction: The management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has evolved substantially over the past decade, with the emergence of new advanced therapies presenting unprecedented challenges in clinical decision-making. While these therapies provide patients with more opportunities to get better, biomarkers to guide their use remain elusive.
Areas covered: This article highlights the challenges associated with biomarker discovery, interpretation, and application in IBD - based on literature review, first-hand experience of biomarker discovery, and personal opinion. We highlight problems including the misinterpretation of predictive capabilities, lack of independent validation, and reverse causation in retrospective studies, and explain why associations with clinical parameters or seropositivity to microbial antigens often fail to meet the rigorous performance metrics required for clinical utility. The relative need for different biomarkers is also discussed - particularly in light of recent evidence from the PROFILE trial, which emphasizes the considerably greater risk posed by uncontrolled disease than by the potential side-effects of medications.
Expert opinion: Despite multiple challenges, the potential of biomarkers for precision medicine in IBD remains promising, particularly in combination with other clinical and biochemical parameters. Further research into combinatorial biomarker approaches is needed, but must be combined with learning how to communicate results that are inherently uncertain.
{"title":"Misinterpretation and misapplication of biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease: how do we avoid this?","authors":"Robert B Varley, James C Lee","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2482980","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2482980","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has evolved substantially over the past decade, with the emergence of new advanced therapies presenting unprecedented challenges in clinical decision-making. While these therapies provide patients with more opportunities to get better, biomarkers to guide their use remain elusive.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article highlights the challenges associated with biomarker discovery, interpretation, and application in IBD - based on literature review, first-hand experience of biomarker discovery, and personal opinion. We highlight problems including the misinterpretation of predictive capabilities, lack of independent validation, and reverse causation in retrospective studies, and explain why associations with clinical parameters or seropositivity to microbial antigens often fail to meet the rigorous performance metrics required for clinical utility. The relative need for different biomarkers is also discussed - particularly in light of recent evidence from the PROFILE trial, which emphasizes the considerably greater risk posed by uncontrolled disease than by the potential side-effects of medications.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Despite multiple challenges, the potential of biomarkers for precision medicine in IBD remains promising, particularly in combination with other clinical and biochemical parameters. Further research into combinatorial biomarker approaches is needed, but must be combined with learning how to communicate results that are inherently uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"359-363"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974923/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143662677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-03-27DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2483995
Ahmed Hashim, Bernardo Stefanini, Fabio Piscaglia
{"title":"Thinking outside the box: unconventional artificial intelligence algorithms in the detection and management of liver cirrhosis.","authors":"Ahmed Hashim, Bernardo Stefanini, Fabio Piscaglia","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2483995","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2483995","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"443-445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143691444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-02-27DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2471874
Madunil A Niriella, Pathum Premaratna, Mananjala Senanayake, Senerath Kodisinghe, Uditha Dassanayake, Anuradha Dassanayake, Dileepa S Ediriweera, H Janaka de Silva
Background: We assessed the use of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT-3.5 and Gemini against human experts as sources of patient information.
Research design and methods: We compared the accuracy, completeness and quality of freely accessible, baseline, general-purpose LLM-generated responses to 20 frequently asked questions (FAQs) on liver disease, with those from two gastroenterologists, using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Three independent gastroenterologists blindly rated each response.
Results: The expert and AI-generated responses displayed high mean scores across all domains, with no statistical difference between the groups for accuracy [H(2) = 0.421, p = 0.811], completeness [H(2) = 3.146, p = 0.207], or quality [H(2) = 3.350, p = 0.187]. We found no statistical difference between rank totals in accuracy [H(2) = 5.559, p = 0.062], completeness [H(2) = 0.104, p = 0.949], or quality [H(2) = 0.420, p = 0.810] between the three raters (R1, R2, R3).
Conclusion: Our findings outline the potential of freely accessible, baseline, general-purpose LLMs in providing reliable answers to FAQs on liver disease.
背景:我们评估了ChatGPT-3.5和Gemini等大型语言模型(llm)与人类专家作为患者信息来源的使用情况。研究设计和方法:使用Kruskal-Wallis测试,我们比较了免费获取的、基线的、通用的法学硕士生成的关于肝病的20个常见问题(FAQs)的回答与两位胃肠病学家的回答的准确性、完整性和质量。三位独立的胃肠病学家盲目地给每个回答打分。结果:专家和人工智能生成的回答在所有领域都显示出很高的平均得分,两组之间在准确性[H(2) = 0.421, p = 0.811]、完整性[H(2) = 3.146, p = 0.207]或质量[H(2) = 3.350, p = 0.187]方面没有统计学差异。我们发现三个评分者(R1, R2, R3)在排序总数的准确性[H(2) = 5.559, p = 0.062]、完整性[H(2) = 0.104, p = 0.949]和质量[H(2) = 0.420, p = 0.810]方面没有统计学差异。结论:我们的研究结果概述了免费获取的、基线的、通用的法学硕士在为肝病常见问题提供可靠答案方面的潜力。
{"title":"The reliability of freely accessible, baseline, general-purpose large language model generated patient information for frequently asked questions on liver disease: a preliminary cross-sectional study.","authors":"Madunil A Niriella, Pathum Premaratna, Mananjala Senanayake, Senerath Kodisinghe, Uditha Dassanayake, Anuradha Dassanayake, Dileepa S Ediriweera, H Janaka de Silva","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2471874","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2471874","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We assessed the use of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT-3.5 and Gemini against human experts as sources of patient information.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We compared the accuracy, completeness and quality of freely accessible, baseline, general-purpose LLM-generated responses to 20 frequently asked questions (FAQs) on liver disease, with those from two gastroenterologists, using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Three independent gastroenterologists blindly rated each response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expert and AI-generated responses displayed high mean scores across all domains, with no statistical difference between the groups for accuracy [H(2) = 0.421, <i>p</i> = 0.811], completeness [H(2) = 3.146, <i>p</i> = 0.207], or quality [H(2) = 3.350, <i>p</i> = 0.187]. We found no statistical difference between rank totals in accuracy [H(2) = 5.559, <i>p</i> = 0.062], completeness [H(2) = 0.104, <i>p</i> = 0.949], or quality [H(2) = 0.420, <i>p</i> = 0.810] between the three raters (R1, R2, R3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings outline the potential of freely accessible, baseline, general-purpose LLMs in providing reliable answers to FAQs on liver disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"437-442"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143476091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-03-10DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2476541
A Dalbeni, F Cattazzo, L A Natola, M Zoncapè, D Faccincani, B Stefanini, F Ravaioli, R Villani, A Auriemma, D Sacerdoti
Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major global health concern, as it is the most common primary liver cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality.
Areas covered: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly shifted the treatment paradigm, offering promising survival outcomes. However, the controlled conditions of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) often fail to reflect real-world complexities, emphasizing the necessity for strong real-world evidence (RWE). RWE, in most cases derived from observational studies, provides critical insights into the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of systemic therapies across diverse populations and settings. The authors searched MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Scopus for full-text published articles in any language from the inception to 30 June 2024.This review evaluates RWE on systemic therapies for advanced HCC, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) like sorafenib and lenvatinib, ICIs such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab, and combination therapies like atezolizumab/bevacizumab and durvalumab/tremelimumab.
Expert opinion: Studies reveal discrepancies in treatment efficacy and adverse event profiles between RCTs and routine clinical practice, underscoring the need for individualized treatment strategies. RWE highlights the influence of liver disease etiology, liver function, and tumor burden on treatment outcomes, guiding therapy selection.
{"title":"What can real-world data teach us about treating patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma?","authors":"A Dalbeni, F Cattazzo, L A Natola, M Zoncapè, D Faccincani, B Stefanini, F Ravaioli, R Villani, A Auriemma, D Sacerdoti","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2476541","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2476541","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major global health concern, as it is the most common primary liver cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly shifted the treatment paradigm, offering promising survival outcomes. However, the controlled conditions of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) often fail to reflect real-world complexities, emphasizing the necessity for strong real-world evidence (RWE). RWE, in most cases derived from observational studies, provides critical insights into the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of systemic therapies across diverse populations and settings. The authors searched MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Scopus for full-text published articles in any language from the inception to 30 June 2024.This review evaluates RWE on systemic therapies for advanced HCC, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) like sorafenib and lenvatinib, ICIs such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab, and combination therapies like atezolizumab/bevacizumab and durvalumab/tremelimumab.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Studies reveal discrepancies in treatment efficacy and adverse event profiles between RCTs and routine clinical practice, underscoring the need for individualized treatment strategies. RWE highlights the influence of liver disease etiology, liver function, and tumor burden on treatment outcomes, guiding therapy selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"389-398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143556225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2486299
Thomas M Attard, Ajay Bansal, Caitlin E Lawson, Nicole Stoecklein, Michele H Maddux
Introduction: Transition of care (TOC) is a process that must be planned and executed in a coordinated manner factoring patient, family, disease, and healthcare system. Among youth with gastrointestinal hereditary polyposis syndromes (HPS), poorly planned TOC can have devastating consequences from poor engagement in necessary medical care. This results in increased risk of cancer and related mortality. This review aims to emphasize unique aspects of HPS relevant to TOC, related barriers/challenges, and outline current best practice recommendations.
Areas covered: A review was undertaken of transition-focused practice guidelines among youth with chronic conditions, as well as literature from major pediatric gastroenterology societies on the ideal approach for managing polyposis syndromes. Literature from PubMed and Medline, including conference abstracts and proceedings, was reviewed and in the absence of empirically supported evidence, recommendations reflect the opinion of the author experts involved in the care of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with HPS.
Expert opinion: Effective TOC requires a structured, patient-centered, individualized process that includes early engagement, incremental education, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Given the unique aspects of HPS, including complex psychosocial and medical needs, there is urgent need for research toward evidence-based strategies enhancing continuity, and mitigating socio-cultural and financial barriers to care.
{"title":"Transition of care in pediatric hereditary polyposis: the why, how and to whom.","authors":"Thomas M Attard, Ajay Bansal, Caitlin E Lawson, Nicole Stoecklein, Michele H Maddux","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2486299","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2486299","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transition of care (TOC) is a process that must be planned and executed in a coordinated manner factoring patient, family, disease, and healthcare system. Among youth with gastrointestinal hereditary polyposis syndromes (HPS), poorly planned TOC can have devastating consequences from poor engagement in necessary medical care. This results in increased risk of cancer and related mortality. This review aims to emphasize unique aspects of HPS relevant to TOC, related barriers/challenges, and outline current best practice recommendations.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A review was undertaken of transition-focused practice guidelines among youth with chronic conditions, as well as literature from major pediatric gastroenterology societies on the ideal approach for managing polyposis syndromes. Literature from PubMed and Medline, including conference abstracts and proceedings, was reviewed and in the absence of empirically supported evidence, recommendations reflect the opinion of the author experts involved in the care of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with HPS.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Effective TOC requires a structured, patient-centered, individualized process that includes early engagement, incremental education, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Given the unique aspects of HPS, including complex psychosocial and medical needs, there is urgent need for research toward evidence-based strategies enhancing continuity, and mitigating socio-cultural and financial barriers to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"527-535"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143751860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic condition characterized by abnormal immune responses and intestinal inflammation. Emerging evidence highlights the vital role of gut microbiota in IBD's onset and progression. Recent advances have shaped diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, increasingly focusing on microbiome-based personalized care. Methodology: this review covers studies from 2004 to 2024, reflecting the surge in research on luminal microbial ecology in IBD. Human studies were prioritized, with select animal studies included for mechanistic insights. Only English-language, peer-reviewed articles - clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses - were considered. Studies without clinical validation were excluded unless offering essential insights. Searches were conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.
Areas covered: we explore mechanisms for managing IBD-related microbiota, including microbial markers for diagnosis and novel therapies such as fecal microbiota transplantation, metabolite-based treatments, and precision microbiome modulation. Additionally, we review technologies and diagnostic tools used to analyze gut microbiota composition and function in clinical settings. Emerging data supporting personalized therapeutic strategies based on individual microbial profiles are discussed.
Expert opinion: Standardized microbiome research integration into clinical practice will enhance precision in IBD care, signaling a shift toward microbiota-based personalized medicine.
炎症性肠病(IBD),包括克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎,是一种以免疫反应异常和肠道炎症为特征的慢性疾病。新出现的证据强调了肠道微生物群在IBD发病和进展中的重要作用。最近的进展已经形成了诊断和治疗策略,越来越多地关注基于微生物组的个性化护理。方法:本综述涵盖了2004年至2024年的研究,反映了IBD肠道微生物生态学研究的激增。优先考虑人类研究,并选择动物研究以获得机制见解。只考虑了英文的、同行评议的文章——临床试验、系统评价和荟萃分析。没有临床验证的研究被排除,除非提供必要的见解。使用PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science进行搜索。涉及领域:我们探索ibd相关微生物群管理机制,包括用于诊断的微生物标记物和新的治疗方法,如粪便微生物群移植、基于代谢物的治疗和精确的微生物群调节。此外,我们回顾了用于分析临床环境中肠道微生物群组成和功能的技术和诊断工具。新兴数据支持个性化的治疗策略,基于个人微生物档案进行了讨论。专家意见:将标准化的微生物组研究整合到临床实践中,将提高IBD护理的准确性,标志着向基于微生物组的个性化医疗的转变。
{"title":"Recent developments in managing luminal microbial ecology in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: from evidence to microbiome-based diagnostic and personalized therapy.","authors":"Erica Bonazzi, Caterina De Barba, Greta Lorenzon, Daria Maniero, Luisa Bertin, Brigida Barberio, Federica Facciotti, Flavio Caprioli, Franco Scaldaferri, Fabiana Zingone, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2495087","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2495087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic condition characterized by abnormal immune responses and intestinal inflammation. Emerging evidence highlights the vital role of gut microbiota in IBD's onset and progression. Recent advances have shaped diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, increasingly focusing on microbiome-based personalized care. Methodology: this review covers studies from 2004 to 2024, reflecting the surge in research on luminal microbial ecology in IBD. Human studies were prioritized, with select animal studies included for mechanistic insights. Only English-language, peer-reviewed articles - clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses - were considered. Studies without clinical validation were excluded unless offering essential insights. Searches were conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>we explore mechanisms for managing IBD-related microbiota, including microbial markers for diagnosis and novel therapies such as fecal microbiota transplantation, metabolite-based treatments, and precision microbiome modulation. Additionally, we review technologies and diagnostic tools used to analyze gut microbiota composition and function in clinical settings. Emerging data supporting personalized therapeutic strategies based on individual microbial profiles are discussed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Standardized microbiome research integration into clinical practice will enhance precision in IBD care, signaling a shift toward microbiota-based personalized medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"563-576"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143959851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}