首页 > 最新文献

Evaluation & the Health Professions最新文献

英文 中文
Factors Influencing the Reporting of Notifiable Conduct in Health Professionals in Australia. 影响澳大利亚卫生专业人员应通报行为报告的因素。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-08-17 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251368457
Deepti Bhasin, Karl Kilian Konrad Wiener

Objective: Notification of misconduct is a requirement by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulatory Agency. The study focuses on examining the factors that influence the intention to report misconduct by applying the Theory of planned behavior model. Method: The quantitative online survey study using vignettes and questionnaires examined one hundred and seventy-two regulated health professionals on factors that may impact the willingness to report on notifiable conduct. Results: The findings indicate that clinicians were more inclined to report on sexual misconduct and alcohol misuse conduct, however, they did not report on clinicians' competencies. Perceived behavior control, descriptive norms, and subjective norms predicted intention to report notifiable conduct, while attitude was not a predictor. Clinicians with a higher reporting intention were more likely to engage in actual reporting behavior. The behavioral pattern of reporting notifiable conduct did not differ among the three health professional groups. Conclusion: The findings identify important factors that assist clinicians in their decision-making when reporting observed misconduct. Awareness of these factors reduces health care related misconduct. That is, organizations are encouraged to develop specific programs that facilitate clinicians' decision making by educating and refreshing their knowledge of the factors impacting their intention to report misconducts.

目的:澳大利亚卫生从业人员监管机构要求对不当行为进行通报。本研究运用计划行为理论模型,探讨影响不当行为报告意愿的因素。方法:定量在线调查研究使用小短文和问卷调查了172名受监管的卫生专业人员对可能影响报告应通报行为意愿的因素。结果:研究结果表明,临床医生更倾向于报告不当性行为和酒精滥用行为,然而,他们没有报告临床医生的能力。感知行为控制、描述性规范和主观规范预测报告应通报行为的意图,而态度不是预测因素。具有较高报告意向的临床医生更有可能参与实际报告行为。报告应通报行为的行为模式在三个卫生专业人员群体之间没有差异。结论:研究结果确定了帮助临床医生在报告观察到的不当行为时做出决策的重要因素。认识到这些因素可以减少与卫生保健有关的不当行为。也就是说,鼓励组织制定具体的计划,通过教育和刷新他们对影响他们报告不当行为意图的因素的知识,促进临床医生的决策。
{"title":"Factors Influencing the Reporting of Notifiable Conduct in Health Professionals in Australia.","authors":"Deepti Bhasin, Karl Kilian Konrad Wiener","doi":"10.1177/01632787251368457","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787251368457","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Notification of misconduct is a requirement by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulatory Agency. The study focuses on examining the factors that influence the intention to report misconduct by applying the Theory of planned behavior model. <b>Method:</b> The quantitative online survey study using vignettes and questionnaires examined one hundred and seventy-two regulated health professionals on factors that may impact the willingness to report on notifiable conduct. <b>Results:</b> The findings indicate that clinicians were more inclined to report on sexual misconduct and alcohol misuse conduct, however, they did not report on clinicians' competencies. Perceived behavior control, descriptive norms, and subjective norms predicted intention to report notifiable conduct, while attitude was not a predictor. Clinicians with a higher reporting intention were more likely to engage in actual reporting behavior. The behavioral pattern of reporting notifiable conduct did not differ among the three health professional groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> The findings identify important factors that assist clinicians in their decision-making when reporting observed misconduct. Awareness of these factors reduces health care related misconduct. That is, organizations are encouraged to develop specific programs that facilitate clinicians' decision making by educating and refreshing their knowledge of the factors impacting their intention to report misconducts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787251368457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144872200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mapping Longitudinal Dynamics of Learning Communities Dealing With Dutch Healthy Weight Approaches: An Updated Causal Loop Diagram. 绘制纵向动态的学习社区处理荷兰健康体重方法:一个更新的因果循环图。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-08-14 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251368438
Maud J J Ter Bogt, Kirsten E Bevelander, Iris E Scholte, Tessa Huttenhuis, Allia C de Rooij, Gerard R M Molleman, Maria E T C van den Muijsenbergh, Gerdine A J Fransen

Learning communities (LCs) stimulate the learning and cross-sectoral collaboration that are essential in multidisciplinary challenges, such as healthy weight approaches (HWAs). Previous research on two multidisciplinary LCs about HWAs devised a causal loop diagram (CLD) identifying dynamics (i.e., mechanisms) that describe the functioning of LCs during their starting phase (first 6 months after LC start). As LCs are likely to develop over project phases, this study aimed to ascertain whether and how the LC system dynamics were perceived to develop over time. Qualitative interviews conducted with the LC members at a second juncture were processed to be able to update the initial CLD. The updated diagram indeed illustrated how the multidisciplinary LCs were perceived to develop. The CLD became more extensive and consequently further explained three aspects: the complexity and interrelatedness of group dynamics, gaining insights through exchange, and conditions to execute actions. To ensure adequate group dynamics, learning, and action execution, LC stakeholders can regularly use the CLD as a blueprint to identify solutions for LC bottlenecks, such as members limitedly arranging the LC jointly. Future research is needed to investigate whether such developments are caused by different LC project phases and/or by the number of LC meetings and reflections.

学习社区(LCs)促进学习和跨部门协作,这对于健康体重方法等多学科挑战至关重要。先前对两种多学科的关于HWAs的LCs的研究设计了一个因果循环图(CLD),确定了描述LCs开始阶段(LCs开始后的前6个月)功能的动力学(即机制)。由于LC可能在项目阶段发展,本研究旨在确定LC系统动力学是否以及如何随着时间的推移而发展。我们在第二个关键时刻与立法会成员进行了定性访谈,以便能够更新最初的立法会报告。更新后的图表确实说明了多学科LCs是如何发展的。CLD变得更加广泛,因此进一步解释了三个方面:群体动态的复杂性和相互关联性,通过交流获得洞察力,以及执行行动的条件。为了确保充分的团队动态、学习和行动执行,LC利益相关者可以定期使用CLD作为蓝图,以确定LC瓶颈的解决方案,例如成员有限地共同安排LC。未来的研究需要调查这种发展是由不同的LC项目阶段和/或LC会议和反思的数量引起的。
{"title":"Mapping Longitudinal Dynamics of Learning Communities Dealing With Dutch Healthy Weight Approaches: An Updated Causal Loop Diagram.","authors":"Maud J J Ter Bogt, Kirsten E Bevelander, Iris E Scholte, Tessa Huttenhuis, Allia C de Rooij, Gerard R M Molleman, Maria E T C van den Muijsenbergh, Gerdine A J Fransen","doi":"10.1177/01632787251368438","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787251368438","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Learning communities (LCs) stimulate the learning and cross-sectoral collaboration that are essential in multidisciplinary challenges, such as healthy weight approaches (HWAs). Previous research on two multidisciplinary LCs about HWAs devised a causal loop diagram (CLD) identifying dynamics (i.e., mechanisms) that describe the functioning of LCs during their starting phase (first 6 months after LC start). As LCs are likely to develop over project phases, this study aimed to ascertain whether and how the LC system dynamics were perceived to develop over time. Qualitative interviews conducted with the LC members at a second juncture were processed to be able to update the initial CLD. The updated diagram indeed illustrated how the multidisciplinary LCs were perceived to develop. The CLD became more extensive and consequently further explained three aspects: the complexity and interrelatedness of group dynamics, gaining insights through exchange, and conditions to execute actions. To ensure adequate group dynamics, learning, and action execution, LC stakeholders can regularly use the CLD as a blueprint to identify solutions for LC bottlenecks, such as members limitedly arranging the LC jointly. Future research is needed to investigate whether such developments are caused by different LC project phases and/or by the number of LC meetings and reflections.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787251368438"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144845073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How is Tobacco Use Addressed at US Substance Use Disorder Treatment Facilities? The Importance of Financial Support for Tobacco Cessation Treatment. 美国物质使用障碍治疗机构如何解决烟草使用问题?财政支持对戒烟治疗的重要性。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-08-11 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251362506
Steve Sussman, Eric Shanazari, Leah Meza, Myriam Forster, Artur Galimov

Persons in substance use disorders (SUD) treatment report a high prevalence of tobacco use. Often neglected in SUD treatment, some recent state-level policies mandated screening and offering tobacco use treatment or referral. We interviewed 85 providers from 68 SUD treatment facilities across 20 US states, assessed providers' estimates of tobacco use prevalence in their facilities, their perceptions on types of nicotine-containing products used by their service users, tobacco policies that were implemented at their facilities, and whether treatment (counseling or pharmacologic treatment) was offered. Prevalence estimates replicate prior findings; however, the variability of the types of nicotine-containing products used was greater than what has been reported in prior studies (cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and modern oral nicotine products). According to providers, 44 (64.7%) of the facilities offered tobacco cessation treatment, and 49 (72.1%) offered FDA-approved pharmacologic adjuncts. Treatment centers in our sample in states mandating assessment/treatment of tobacco use were relatively less likely to offer tobacco cessation treatment (52.8% vs. 78.1%), whereas facilities that accepted insurance as a payment option were more likely to provide these services (77.6% vs. 31.6%). These data suggest that policy mandates may be less effective than financial incentives at promoting tobacco use cessation in SUD facilities.

接受药物使用障碍(SUD)治疗的人报告烟草使用率很高。在SUD治疗中经常被忽视,最近一些州一级的政策强制筛查并提供烟草使用治疗或转诊。我们采访了来自美国20个州68家SUD治疗机构的85名提供者,评估了提供者对其设施中烟草使用流行程度的估计,他们对服务用户使用的含尼古丁产品类型的看法,他们设施中实施的烟草政策,以及是否提供治疗(咨询或药物治疗)。患病率估计重复了先前的发现;然而,使用的含尼古丁产品类型的可变性比先前研究(香烟、电子烟和现代口服尼古丁产品)中报道的要大。据供应商称,44家(64.7%)提供戒烟治疗,49家(72.1%)提供fda批准的药物辅助治疗。在我们的样本中,强制评估/治疗烟草使用的州的治疗中心提供戒烟治疗的可能性相对较小(52.8%对78.1%),而接受保险作为支付选项的设施更有可能提供这些服务(77.6%对31.6%)。这些数据表明,在促进SUD设施中戒烟方面,政策规定可能不如财政激励有效。
{"title":"How is Tobacco Use Addressed at US Substance Use Disorder Treatment Facilities? The Importance of Financial Support for Tobacco Cessation Treatment.","authors":"Steve Sussman, Eric Shanazari, Leah Meza, Myriam Forster, Artur Galimov","doi":"10.1177/01632787251362506","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787251362506","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Persons in substance use disorders (SUD) treatment report a high prevalence of tobacco use. Often neglected in SUD treatment, some recent state-level policies mandated screening and offering tobacco use treatment or referral. We interviewed 85 providers from 68 SUD treatment facilities across 20 US states, assessed providers' estimates of tobacco use prevalence in their facilities, their perceptions on types of nicotine-containing products used by their service users, tobacco policies that were implemented at their facilities, and whether treatment (counseling or pharmacologic treatment) was offered. Prevalence estimates replicate prior findings; however, the variability of the types of nicotine-containing products used was greater than what has been reported in prior studies (cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and modern oral nicotine products). According to providers, 44 (64.7%) of the facilities offered tobacco cessation treatment, and 49 (72.1%) offered FDA-approved pharmacologic adjuncts. Treatment centers in our sample in states mandating assessment/treatment of tobacco use were relatively less likely to offer tobacco cessation treatment (52.8% vs. 78.1%), whereas facilities that accepted insurance as a payment option were more likely to provide these services (77.6% vs. 31.6%). These data suggest that policy mandates may be less effective than financial incentives at promoting tobacco use cessation in SUD facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787251362506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144816084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Planning for New Threats to Online Research Data Validity: The Issue of Computer-Using Agents. 规划对在线研究数据有效性的新威胁:计算机使用代理的问题。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-08-07 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251367407
Jon Agley

Increasing numbers of research studies are completed entirely online, often using "crowdsourcing" platforms to recruit participants, such as Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) or Prolific. Over time, crowdsourced data collection has faced multiple threats to validity including bots, inattention, and misrepresentation. Fortunately, research and development of quality control techniques has resulted in approaches to conducting credible research using crowdsourcing platforms. However, advances in large language models (LLMs), particularly computer-using agents (CUAs), such as OpenAI's "Operator," may pose novel threats to the validity of crowdsourced research data in the future. This brief report explores how and why that might be the case and encourages further discussion of this issue.

越来越多的研究完全在线完成,通常使用“众包”平台招募参与者,例如亚马逊的Mechanical Turk (MTurk)或多产(高产)。随着时间的推移,众包数据收集面临着多种有效性威胁,包括机器人、注意力不集中和虚假陈述。幸运的是,质量控制技术的研究和发展已经产生了使用众包平台进行可信研究的方法。然而,大型语言模型(llm)的进步,特别是计算机使用代理(CUAs),如OpenAI的“操作员”,可能会对未来众包研究数据的有效性构成新的威胁。这份简短的报告探讨了如何以及为什么会出现这种情况,并鼓励进一步讨论这个问题。
{"title":"Planning for New Threats to Online Research Data Validity: The Issue of Computer-Using Agents.","authors":"Jon Agley","doi":"10.1177/01632787251367407","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787251367407","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing numbers of research studies are completed entirely online, often using \"crowdsourcing\" platforms to recruit participants, such as Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) or Prolific. Over time, crowdsourced data collection has faced multiple threats to validity including bots, inattention, and misrepresentation. Fortunately, research and development of quality control techniques has resulted in approaches to conducting credible research using crowdsourcing platforms. However, advances in large language models (LLMs), particularly computer-using agents (CUAs), such as OpenAI's \"Operator,\" may pose novel threats to the validity of crowdsourced research data in the future. This brief report explores how and why that might be the case and encourages further discussion of this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787251367407"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144793893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unidimensional or Multidimensional? Understanding Burnout of Counseling Trainees Using Item Response Theory. 单维还是多维?用项目反应理论了解辅导学员的职业倦怠。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-28 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251361481
Byeolbee Um, Junhee Park

This study aimed to investigate the construct of burnout in counseling trainees using item response theory. The psychometric properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey for Students (MBI-GS(S)) were examined with a sample of counseling trainees (N = 246). Based on the graded response model, the results supported only the three-factor solution of counseling trainees' burnout and provided little evidence for general burnout as a potential construct. Specific item-level information from multidimensional item response theory analysis is also presented, including item discrimination parameters, item difficulty location parameters, test information, and reliability. Implications for assessing and addressing counseling trainees' burnout in terms of educating future mental health professionals are discussed.

本研究旨在运用项目反应理论探讨心理咨询学员的职业倦怠结构。以246名辅导学员为样本,对Maslach学生职业倦怠量表(MBI-GS)的心理测量特征进行检验。基于分级反应模型的研究结果仅支持辅导学员倦怠的三因素解,对一般倦怠作为潜在构念的证据不足。通过多维题项反应理论分析,给出了具体的题项层次信息,包括题项判别参数、题项难度定位参数、测试信息和信度。本文讨论了心理咨询学员倦怠的评估和处理对未来心理健康专业人员的教育意义。
{"title":"Unidimensional or Multidimensional? Understanding Burnout of Counseling Trainees Using Item Response Theory.","authors":"Byeolbee Um, Junhee Park","doi":"10.1177/01632787251361481","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787251361481","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the construct of burnout in counseling trainees using item response theory. The psychometric properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey for Students (MBI-GS(S)) were examined with a sample of counseling trainees (<i>N</i> = 246). Based on the graded response model, the results supported only the three-factor solution of counseling trainees' burnout and provided little evidence for general burnout as a potential construct. Specific item-level information from multidimensional item response theory analysis is also presented, including item discrimination parameters, item difficulty location parameters, test information, and reliability. Implications for assessing and addressing counseling trainees' burnout in terms of educating future mental health professionals are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787251361481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144729070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Received Social Support Scale for Persons With Mental Illness: Psychometric Properties, Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version. 心理疾病患者接受社会支持量表:土耳其语版的心理测量特性、效度和信度。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-18 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251361540
Emine Nur Celik, Dilek Avci

This methodological study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Received Social Support Scale for Persons with Mental Illness (rSSS-MI), developed by Chronister et al. (2022), by adapting it into Turkish. The study consisted of 274 people who applied to the psychiatry outpatient clinic of a state hospital between April 2023 and April 2024. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form, the Received Social Support Scale for Persons with Mental Illness, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. The Turkish version of the rSSS-MI demonstrated a 3-factor structure consisting of 21-items, and the items' factor loadings ranged from 0.82 to 0.96. The goodness of fit indices were χ2/df = 3.335, GFI = 0.823, NFI = 0.933, TLI = 0.944, IFI = 0.952, CFI = 0.952, RMSEA = 0.092, and SRMR = 0.024. Additionally, Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the rSSS-MI was calculated as 0.98, and item-total score correlation coefficients were between 0.80 and 0.92. These findings indicate that the Turkish version of the rSSS-MI is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

本方法学研究旨在评估由Chronister等人(2022)开发的精神疾病患者获得的社会支持量表(rSSS-MI)的效度和可靠性,并将其改编为土耳其语。这项研究包括274名在2023年4月至2024年4月期间申请到一家州立医院精神病学门诊的人。数据采用个人信息表、精神疾病患者接受社会支持量表和多维感知社会支持量表收集。土耳其版rSSS-MI量表具有21个题项的3因子结构,题项的因子负荷量在0.82 ~ 0.96之间。拟合优度指标为χ2/df = 3.335, GFI = 0.823, NFI = 0.933, TLI = 0.944, IFI = 0.952, CFI = 0.952, RMSEA = 0.092, SRMR = 0.024。此外,计算出rSSS-MI的Cronbach's alpha系数为0.98,项目总分相关系数在0.80 ~ 0.92之间。这些发现表明,土耳其版本的rSSS-MI是一个有效和可靠的测量工具。
{"title":"Received Social Support Scale for Persons With Mental Illness: Psychometric Properties, Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version.","authors":"Emine Nur Celik, Dilek Avci","doi":"10.1177/01632787251361540","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787251361540","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This methodological study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Received Social Support Scale for Persons with Mental Illness (rSSS-MI), developed by Chronister et al. (2022), by adapting it into Turkish. The study consisted of 274 people who applied to the psychiatry outpatient clinic of a state hospital between April 2023 and April 2024. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form, the Received Social Support Scale for Persons with Mental Illness, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. The Turkish version of the rSSS-MI demonstrated a 3-factor structure consisting of 21-items, and the items' factor loadings ranged from 0.82 to 0.96. The goodness of fit indices were χ2/df = 3.335, GFI = 0.823, NFI = 0.933, TLI = 0.944, IFI = 0.952, CFI = 0.952, RMSEA = 0.092, and SRMR = 0.024. Additionally, Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the rSSS-MI was calculated as 0.98, and item-total score correlation coefficients were between 0.80 and 0.92. These findings indicate that the Turkish version of the rSSS-MI is a valid and reliable measurement tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787251361540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144658842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Version of the Mental Health Quality of Life Questionnaire. 土耳其版心理健康生活质量问卷的心理测量学评价。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-18 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251362213
Eda Altinoz, Dilek Avci

Although there is growing interest in assessing the quality of life (QoL) in mental health services, there is currently no specific measurement tool for mental disorders in Turkey. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric features of the Turkish version of the Mental Health Quality of Life Questionnaire (MHQoL). This methodological study was conducted with 310 patients diagnosed with mental disorders between October 2022 and June 2023. The MHQoL includes a descriptive system (MHQoL-7D) of seven items representing distinct dimensions- self-image, independence, mood, relationships, daily activities, physical health, and future- alongside a visual analog scale measuring general psychological well-being (MHQoL-VAS). Turkish MHQoL yielded a one-factor structure with 7 items and factor loadings ranging from 0.426 to 0.727. Goodness-of-fit indexes of the MHQoL were found to be χ2/df = 1.212, SRMR = 0.026, RMSEA = 0.026, GFI = 0.985, AGFI = 0.969, CFI = 0.995, IFI = 0.995, and TLI = 0.991. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was measured at 0.792, with item-total correlation coefficients from 0.378 to 0.609. Turkish MHQoL is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating QoL in individuals with mental health challenges.

尽管人们对评估精神卫生服务中的生活质量越来越感兴趣,但土耳其目前没有针对精神障碍的具体衡量工具。本研究旨在评估土耳其版心理健康生活质量问卷(MHQoL)的心理测量特征。该方法学研究在2022年10月至2023年6月期间对310名诊断为精神障碍的患者进行了研究。MHQoL包括一个描述系统(MHQoL- 7d),由七个项目组成,代表不同的维度——自我形象、独立性、情绪、人际关系、日常活动、身体健康和未来——以及一个测量一般心理健康的视觉模拟量表(MHQoL- vas)。土耳其MHQoL为单因子结构,因子负荷范围为0.426 ~ 0.727。MHQoL的拟合优度指标为χ2/df = 1.212, SRMR = 0.026, RMSEA = 0.026, GFI = 0.985, AGFI = 0.969, CFI = 0.995, IFI = 0.995, TLI = 0.991。Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.792,项目-总量相关系数为0.378 ~ 0.609。土耳其MHQoL是评估心理健康挑战个体生活质量的可靠和有效的工具。
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Version of the Mental Health Quality of Life Questionnaire.","authors":"Eda Altinoz, Dilek Avci","doi":"10.1177/01632787251362213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787251362213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although there is growing interest in assessing the quality of life (QoL) in mental health services, there is currently no specific measurement tool for mental disorders in Turkey. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric features of the Turkish version of the Mental Health Quality of Life Questionnaire (MHQoL). This methodological study was conducted with 310 patients diagnosed with mental disorders between October 2022 and June 2023. The MHQoL includes a descriptive system (MHQoL-7D) of seven items representing distinct dimensions- self-image, independence, mood, relationships, daily activities, physical health, and future- alongside a visual analog scale measuring general psychological well-being (MHQoL-VAS). Turkish MHQoL yielded a one-factor structure with 7 items and factor loadings ranging from 0.426 to 0.727. Goodness-of-fit indexes of the MHQoL were found to be χ2/df = 1.212, SRMR = 0.026, RMSEA = 0.026, GFI = 0.985, AGFI = 0.969, CFI = 0.995, IFI = 0.995, and TLI = 0.991. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was measured at 0.792, with item-total correlation coefficients from 0.378 to 0.609. Turkish MHQoL is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating QoL in individuals with mental health challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787251362213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144658841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Comprehensive Simulation Study to Evaluate the Effect Size and Study Length Relationship in Single-Group Interrupted Time Series Analysis. 评价单组中断时间序列分析中效应大小和研究时间关系的综合模拟研究。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-15 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251361514
Ariel Linden

Single-group interrupted time-series analysis (ITSA) is a popular non-experimental study design in healthcare research. However, little guidance is available to inform the power requirements of ITSA studies under most common usages. We performed simulations to estimate the number of time periods (ranging from 10 to 100) required for percentage increases in level and trend (from baseline), to achieve statistical significance (p < 0.05, p < 0.01) with >80% and >90% power, when autocorrelation ranges from -0.90 to 0.90, and the intervention is introduced at 33%, 50% and 67% of the time series. Larger effect sizes were required for shorter studies, as well as with increasing autocorrelation, and when the intervention was introduced earlier or later than halfway in the time series. The required effect sizes were generally lower for estimating a change in the level of the time series as compared with the change in the trend, but the opposite was true when the number of time periods was larger. Simulations of studies with 10 time periods consistently produced unreliable estimates. The tables created from these analyses as well as a new community-contributed Stata package called POWER_ITSA will guide healthcare researchers in determining the most efficient way to achieve anticipated treatment effects in single-group ITSA studies.

单组中断时间序列分析(ITSA)是医疗保健研究中常用的一种非实验研究设计。但是,在大多数常见的用法下,几乎没有指导信息技术安全管理局研究的功率要求。我们进行了模拟,以估计水平和趋势(从基线)百分比增加所需的时间段数(范围从10到100),当自相关范围为-0.90至0.90,并且在33%,50%和67%的时间序列中引入干预时,>的功率为80%,>的功率为90%,达到统计显著性(p < 0.05, p < 0.01)。对于较短的研究,以及随着自相关性的增加,以及当干预措施在时间序列的半程之前或之后引入时,需要更大的效应量。与趋势变化相比,估计时间序列水平变化所需的效应量通常较低,但当时间段数量较大时,情况正好相反。对10个时间段的模拟研究始终得出不可靠的估计。从这些分析中创建的表格以及一个新的社区贡献的Stata包POWER_ITSA将指导医疗保健研究人员确定在单组ITSA研究中实现预期治疗效果的最有效方法。
{"title":"A Comprehensive Simulation Study to Evaluate the Effect Size and Study Length Relationship in Single-Group Interrupted Time Series Analysis.","authors":"Ariel Linden","doi":"10.1177/01632787251361514","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787251361514","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single-group interrupted time-series analysis (ITSA) is a popular non-experimental study design in healthcare research. However, little guidance is available to inform the power requirements of ITSA studies under most common usages. We performed simulations to estimate the number of time periods (ranging from 10 to 100) required for percentage increases in level and trend (from baseline), to achieve statistical significance (<i>p</i> < 0.05, <i>p</i> < 0.01) with >80% and >90% power, when autocorrelation ranges from -0.90 to 0.90, and the intervention is introduced at 33%, 50% and 67% of the time series. Larger effect sizes were required for shorter studies, as well as with increasing autocorrelation, and when the intervention was introduced earlier or later than halfway in the time series. The required effect sizes were generally lower for estimating a change in the level of the time series as compared with the change in the trend, but the opposite was true when the number of time periods was larger. Simulations of studies with 10 time periods consistently produced unreliable estimates. The tables created from these analyses as well as a new community-contributed Stata package called <i>POWER_ITSA</i> will guide healthcare researchers in determining the most efficient way to achieve anticipated treatment effects in single-group ITSA studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787251361514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144636645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary - A Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Program Evaluation: Considerations for a Community-Engaged Approach. 评论-项目评估定性研究的综合:对社区参与方法的考虑。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251357596
Mimi M Kim, Roland J Thorpe, Keith E Whitfield

Qualitative research methodologies offer critical contextual insights into community-engaged program evaluations, addressing limitations in solely quantitative approaches. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are inherently rigorous, their design does not consider nuanced contextual factors and lived experiences that are valuable to understanding a program's impact on community and health outcomes within diverse populations. In this theoretical discussion, we posit that qualitative methods, particularly when grounded in a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) framework, foster trust and collaboration, yielding richer, more community-specific data to enhance program evaluation. We also provide evidence-based, practical consideration for conducting qualitative research for community-engaged program evaluations. We explore various qualitative approaches and their application in program evaluations. We highlight the iterative nature of qualitative data analysis and emphasize the importance of qualitative methodological rigor - including coding, triangulation, and member checking - to ensure the program evaluation's community value, credibility, and deeper contextual evaluation. Ultimately, we underscore the value of integrating qualitative methods throughout a program's lifecycle for comprehensive assessments, improved program effectiveness, and enhanced equity.

定性研究方法为社区参与的项目评估提供了关键的背景见解,解决了单独定量方法的局限性。虽然随机对照试验(rct)本质上是严格的,但它们的设计并没有考虑细微的背景因素和生活经历,而这些因素和经历对于理解项目对不同人群的社区和健康结果的影响是有价值的。在这一理论讨论中,我们假设定性方法,特别是基于社区参与性研究(CBPR)框架的方法,可以促进信任和合作,产生更丰富、更具体的社区数据,以加强项目评估。我们还为社区参与项目评估的定性研究提供了基于证据的实际考虑。我们探索各种定性方法及其在项目评估中的应用。我们强调定性数据分析的迭代性质,并强调定性方法严谨性的重要性——包括编码、三角测量和成员检查——以确保项目评估的社区价值、可信度和更深层次的上下文评估。最后,我们强调在整个项目生命周期中整合定性方法的价值,以进行全面评估、改进项目有效性和增强公平性。
{"title":"Commentary - A Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Program Evaluation: Considerations for a Community-Engaged Approach.","authors":"Mimi M Kim, Roland J Thorpe, Keith E Whitfield","doi":"10.1177/01632787251357596","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787251357596","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Qualitative research methodologies offer critical contextual insights into community-engaged program evaluations, addressing limitations in solely quantitative approaches. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are inherently rigorous, their design does not consider nuanced contextual factors and lived experiences that are valuable to understanding a program's impact on community and health outcomes within diverse populations. In this theoretical discussion, we posit that qualitative methods, particularly when grounded in a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) framework, foster trust and collaboration, yielding richer, more community-specific data to enhance program evaluation. We also provide evidence-based, practical consideration for conducting qualitative research for community-engaged program evaluations. We explore various qualitative approaches and their application in program evaluations. We highlight the iterative nature of qualitative data analysis and emphasize the importance of qualitative methodological rigor - including coding, triangulation, and member checking - to ensure the program evaluation's community value, credibility, and deeper contextual evaluation. Ultimately, we underscore the value of integrating qualitative methods throughout a program's lifecycle for comprehensive assessments, improved program effectiveness, and enhanced equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787251357596"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144599874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Stakeholder Involvement in Intervention Implementation Studies: Systematic Evidence Synthesis With an Evidence Gap Map Approach. 探索利益相关者在干预实施研究中的参与:基于证据缺口图方法的系统证据合成。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-06-26 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251352837
Kristina Arnahoutova, Sabina De Geest, Juliane Mielke, Annette Boaz, Helene Schoemans, Sabine Valenta

Stakeholder involvement (SI) is essential for effective and sustainable intervention implementation, yet practical guidance is lacking. This study mapped SI use in implementation science studies, identified gaps, and proposed a practical framework for improved SI planning. Using an evidence gap map approach, this study built on Mielke et al.'s (2022) methodology, which identified implementation studies from 2015-2020. The search was updated to include studies from 2021-2023 from PubMed, using the same search strategy and inclusion criteria. Data extraction followed the Guidance for Reporting on Involvement of Patients and the Public reporting checklist. From 10,184 studies, a random sample of 2,005 was screened, adding 162 implementation science studies to Mielke et al.'s 110, totaling 272 studies for SI analysis. SI was reported in 89% of studies, but often lacked depth and strategic planning. Stakeholders were mainly engaged during the preparatory phase. Most studies involved micro- and meso-level stakeholders, rarely including macro-level stakeholders. Few described stakeholder selection or preparation. SI was mostly consultative, via interviews, surveys, and focus groups, with limited active collaboration. SI processes and costs were rarely evaluated. Our findings underscore the need for structured, comprehensive SI planning and offer practical recommendations to strengthen SI efforts in implementation research.

利益相关者参与(SI)对于有效和可持续的干预实施至关重要,但缺乏实际指导。本研究绘制了科学探究在实施科学研究中的应用,确定了差距,并提出了一个改进科学探究计划的实用框架。本研究采用证据差距图方法,以Mielke等人(2022)的方法为基础,确定了2015-2020年的实施研究。使用相同的搜索策略和纳入标准,更新了PubMed中2021-2023年的研究。数据提取遵循《患者参与报告指南》和《公众报告清单》。从10184项研究中,随机筛选出2005项,在Mielke等人的110项研究基础上增加162项实施科学研究,共计272项研究用于SI分析。89%的研究报告了SI,但往往缺乏深度和战略规划。持份者主要在筹备阶段参与。大多数研究涉及微观和中观层面的利益相关者,很少涉及宏观层面的利益相关者。很少有人描述利益相关者的选择或准备。SI主要是咨询,通过访谈,调查和焦点小组,有限的积极合作。SI过程和成本很少被评估。我们的研究结果强调了结构化、全面的科学探究计划的必要性,并提供了切实可行的建议,以加强科学探究在实施研究中的努力。
{"title":"Exploring Stakeholder Involvement in Intervention Implementation Studies: Systematic Evidence Synthesis With an Evidence Gap Map Approach.","authors":"Kristina Arnahoutova, Sabina De Geest, Juliane Mielke, Annette Boaz, Helene Schoemans, Sabine Valenta","doi":"10.1177/01632787251352837","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787251352837","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stakeholder involvement (SI) is essential for effective and sustainable intervention implementation, yet practical guidance is lacking. This study mapped SI use in implementation science studies, identified gaps, and proposed a practical framework for improved SI planning. Using an evidence gap map approach, this study built on Mielke et al.'s (2022) methodology, which identified implementation studies from 2015-2020. The search was updated to include studies from 2021-2023 from PubMed, using the same search strategy and inclusion criteria. Data extraction followed the Guidance for Reporting on Involvement of Patients and the Public reporting checklist. From 10,184 studies, a random sample of 2,005 was screened, adding 162 implementation science studies to Mielke et al.'s 110, totaling 272 studies for SI analysis. SI was reported in 89% of studies, but often lacked depth and strategic planning. Stakeholders were mainly engaged during the preparatory phase. Most studies involved micro- and meso-level stakeholders, rarely including macro-level stakeholders. Few described stakeholder selection or preparation. SI was mostly consultative, via interviews, surveys, and focus groups, with limited active collaboration. SI processes and costs were rarely evaluated. Our findings underscore the need for structured, comprehensive SI planning and offer practical recommendations to strengthen SI efforts in implementation research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787251352837"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144505308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Evaluation & the Health Professions
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1