Pub Date : 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.014
Samuel O. Igbinedion MD
{"title":"Fiducial markers in esophageal and rectal cancer therapy: potential benefits and financial considerations","authors":"Samuel O. Igbinedion MD","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"101 3","pages":"Pages 578-579"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143520747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.045
Todd A. Brenner MD, Jianing Li MD, Venkata S. Akshintala MD
{"title":"Response","authors":"Todd A. Brenner MD, Jianing Li MD, Venkata S. Akshintala MD","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.045","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.045","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"101 3","pages":"Pages 693-694"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143520767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-28DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2025.02.030
Manuel Barrera, Lucas De la Noi, José Miguel González, Javier Chahuán
{"title":"Unmasking the Pain: Cytomegalovirus Gastric Infection Revealed Through Unusual Gastric Lesions.","authors":"Manuel Barrera, Lucas De la Noi, José Miguel González, Javier Chahuán","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.02.030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.02.030","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143536781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-28DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2025.02.041
Suchapa Arayakarnkul, Jacquelin Blomker, Amir Sultan Seid, Iman Afraz, Nicole Theis-Mahon, Natalie Wilson, Rahul Karna, Mohammad Bilal
Background and aims: Cholecystectomy (CCY) is considered the gold standard intervention for acute cholecystitis (AC). However, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) can be performed in patients unfit for surgery. Interval CCY after EUS-GBD is typically not performed as the formation of cholecystoenteric fistula increases the technical complexity of CCY. We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the outcomes of interval CCY following EUS-GBD.
Methods: We conducted a literature search of multiple electronic databases for studies reporting on outcomes of interval CCY following EUS-GBD. Primary outcomes were pooled proportions of technical success of interval CCY, and surgical techniques (rate of open, laparoscopic, and conversion from laparoscopic to open). Secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs). A meta-analysis of proportion was performed using the random-effects model. I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.
Results: Of 1001 citations, 15 studies with 707 patients were included. The pooled proportion of successful interval CCY was 32.9% (confidence interval (CI): 11.8-53.9%; I2 99%). Surgical techniques included laparoscopic CCY in 76.2% (CI: 61.5-91.0%; I2 82%), open CCY in 14.5% (CI: 4.2-24.8%; I2 82%), while 14% (CI: 4.1-23.8%; I2 77%) were converted from laparoscopic to open CCY. The pooled proportion of overall AEs was 13.2% (CI: 4.3-22.1%; I2 61%), including postoperative infection in 7.6% (CI: 0.7-14.6%; I2 65%). There was no procedure-related mortality.
Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that interval CCY is technically feasible and safe after EUS-GBD. Endoscopists should still consider the local surgical expertise and recommendations before performing EUS-GBD in patients who could eventually become surgical candidates afterward.
{"title":"Outcomes of Interval Cholecystectomy Following Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Gallbladder Drainage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Suchapa Arayakarnkul, Jacquelin Blomker, Amir Sultan Seid, Iman Afraz, Nicole Theis-Mahon, Natalie Wilson, Rahul Karna, Mohammad Bilal","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.02.041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.02.041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Cholecystectomy (CCY) is considered the gold standard intervention for acute cholecystitis (AC). However, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) can be performed in patients unfit for surgery. Interval CCY after EUS-GBD is typically not performed as the formation of cholecystoenteric fistula increases the technical complexity of CCY. We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the outcomes of interval CCY following EUS-GBD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search of multiple electronic databases for studies reporting on outcomes of interval CCY following EUS-GBD. Primary outcomes were pooled proportions of technical success of interval CCY, and surgical techniques (rate of open, laparoscopic, and conversion from laparoscopic to open). Secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs). A meta-analysis of proportion was performed using the random-effects model. I<sup>2</sup> statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1001 citations, 15 studies with 707 patients were included. The pooled proportion of successful interval CCY was 32.9% (confidence interval (CI): 11.8-53.9%; I<sup>2</sup> 99%). Surgical techniques included laparoscopic CCY in 76.2% (CI: 61.5-91.0%; I<sup>2</sup> 82%), open CCY in 14.5% (CI: 4.2-24.8%; I<sup>2</sup> 82%), while 14% (CI: 4.1-23.8%; I<sup>2</sup> 77%) were converted from laparoscopic to open CCY. The pooled proportion of overall AEs was 13.2% (CI: 4.3-22.1%; I<sup>2</sup> 61%), including postoperative infection in 7.6% (CI: 0.7-14.6%; I<sup>2</sup> 65%). There was no procedure-related mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that interval CCY is technically feasible and safe after EUS-GBD. Endoscopists should still consider the local surgical expertise and recommendations before performing EUS-GBD in patients who could eventually become surgical candidates afterward.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143537077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-28DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2025.02.034
Xiaohui Zhuang, Guohong Liu, Hui Zhou, Lei Li
{"title":"A case of acute phlegmonous gastritis combined with eosinophilic gastroenteritis.","authors":"Xiaohui Zhuang, Guohong Liu, Hui Zhou, Lei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.02.034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.02.034","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143537064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号