Future oncology最新文献

What is this summary about?: This summary describes the results from the TALAPRO-2 research study (also known as a clinical trial). The TALAPRO-2 study tested the combination of two medicines called talazoparib plus enzalutamide. This combination of medicines was used as the first treatment for adult patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The combination of talazoparib plus enzalutamide was compared with a placebo plus enzalutamide.

What is metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer?: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is a type of cancer that starts in the prostate and has spread to other parts of the body. Castration-resistant means that the cancer continues to grow even when testosterone levels in the blood are reduced to very low levels. Taking medicines to lower testosterone levels in the blood is a standard treatment for men with advanced prostate cancer.

What are the aims of the talapro-2 trial?: TALAPRO-2 looked at if combining talazoparib plus enzalutamide would increase the length of time patients lived before their cancer got worse or they died compared with a placebo plus enzalutamide. Researchers looked at how treatment affected the size and number of tumors and the length of time before patients needed to change to a new cancer medicine. Researchers also looked at any side effects patients had during the study.

What are the key takeaways?: A total of 805 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer took part in the study. Compared with patients who took a placebo plus enzalutamide, the group of patients who took talazoparib plus enzalutamide had a 37% reduced risk of their cancer getting worse or dying. Some patients had tumors that at the start of the study could be measured with scans. Sixty-two percent of patients who took talazoparib plus enzalutamide had their tumors decrease or shrink to the point that they could no longer be seen on scans versus 44% of patients who took a placebo plus enzalutamide. Patients who took talazoparib plus enzalutamide were more likely to have a longer time before they needed to change to a new cancer medicine. The most common side effects of talazoparib plus enzalutamide were low levels of red blood cells (66% of patients) and neutrophils (36% of patients), and excessive tiredness or exhaustion (34% of patients).Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03395197 (TALAPRO-2) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

What is this summary about?: This is a summary describing the results from a phase 3 clinical trial called SUNLIGHT. The study looked at treatment with orally administered trifluridine/tipiracil plus intravenously administered bevacizumab in people with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that is refractory to treatment.This study included people whose cancer had grown or spread beyond its original location after no more than two previous treatments. People in the study received either the combination of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab or they received trifluridine/tipiracil alone. The aims of the study were to see how long people lived after treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab compared with trifluridine/tipiracil alone and to find out how well the combination of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab worked at slowing down the spread of the cancer. Researchers also looked at side effects from taking the medicines and at how treatment affected people's physical functioning.

What are the key takeaways?: People in the combination group lived longer (a median of 10.8 months) than people who received trifluridine/tipiracil alone (7.5 months). In addition, the time it took for the cancer to worsen was longer for those who received the combination treatment (a median of 5.6 months) compared with those who received trifluridine/tipiracil alone (2.4 months). People's physical functioning took longer to worsen with combination therapy (a median of 9.3 months) than it did with trifluridine/tipiracil alone (6.3 months), as measured by the impact of treatment on people's ability to carry out daily living activities. The most common side effects in both treatment groups were low levels of white blood cells, known as neutrophils (neutropenia), nausea, and low levels of healthy red blood cells (anemia).

What were the main conclusions reported by the researchers?: The results from the study suggest that treatment with oral trifluridine/tipiracil plus intravenous (IV) bevacizumab could help people with refractory mCRC live longer and maintain good physical functioning, and it could slow the worsening of their cancer.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04737187 (SUNLIGHT) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

What is this summary about?: This is a summary of two studies that looked at the safety and effectiveness of a potential new treatment, N-803 (Anktiva), in combination with a standard treatment bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) for people with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).One study was a Phase 1b study that tested increasing doses of N-803 in combination with the same dose of BCG in people with NMIBC who had never received BCG previously (BCG-naive). The other study is a Phase 2/3 study of N-803 and BCG in people with NMIBC whose cancer wasn't eliminated by BCG alone (BCGunresponsive).

What happened in the studies?: In the Phase 1b study, the nine participants were split into three groups of 3 participants who received a dose of 100, 200, or 400 μg N-803 along with a standard 50 mg dose of BCG. In the Phase 2/3 study, one group (cohort A) of participants with carcinoma in situ (CIS) disease and another group (cohort B) with papillary disease were treated with 400 μg N-803 plus 50 mg BCG. There was also a cohort C that received only 400 μg N-803. Treatments were delivered directly into the bladder once a week for 6 weeks in a row.

What were the key takeaways?: N-803 plus BCG eliminated NMIBC in all nine BCG-naive participants and the effects were long-lasting, with participants remaining NMIBC-free for a range of 8.3 to 9.2 years.As reported in 2022, cancer was eliminated in 58 of 82 (71%) participants with BCG-unresponsive CIS disease and the effect was also long-lasting. Importantly, approximately 90% of the successfully treated participants avoided surgical removal of the bladder. In cohort B participants with papillary disease, 40 of 72 (55.4%) were cancer-free 12 months after treatment. N-803 used alone was only effective in 2 of 10 participants. In both studies, the combination of N-803 and BCG was found to be associated with very few adverse events.Based on results from the Phase 2/3 study, the U.S. Food and Drug Association (FDA) approved the use of N-803 plus BCG for the treatment of BCG-unresponsive bladder CIS with or without Ta/T1 papillary disease.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02138734 (Phase 1b study), NCT03022825 (Phase 2/3 study).

What is this summary about?: This is a summary of a research study called revised STARS. The STARS study involved people with non-small-cell lung cancer, also known as NSCLC. The cancer was less than 5 cm in size and had not spread to other parts of the body (known as stage 1 cancer). The study compared the effectiveness of surgery versus a type of radiotherapy treatment, called stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (also known as SABR) as a treatment for people with NSCLC. Researchers wanted to find out how likely people were to be alive after treatment or if their cancer had grown or spread to other parts of their body (also known as progressed).

What were the results?: The study found that the long term outcomes were similar between SABR and surgery. People with NSCLC were as likely to be alive 3 years after treatment with SABR compared to surgery.

What do the results of the study mean?: SABR may be an alternative to surgery for people with stage 1 NSCLC which is less than 5 cm in size and has not spread to other parts of the bodyClinical Trial Registration: NCT02357992 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

A consensus regarding subsequent therapeutic strategies for patients with platinum- and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi)-resistant ovarian cancer is lacking. These patients typically receive non-platinum-based chemotherapy; however, survival outcomes remain poor. Compared with chemotherapy alone, combination therapy with novel target agents can provide additional benefits to these patients. Oregovomab, an investigational murine monoclonal antibody against CA-125, has shown promising efficacy in a phase II study in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Herein, we described the rationale and design of OPERA/KGOG 3065/APGOT-OV6, a multicenter, investigator-initiated, two-cohort, single-arm phase II trial, aimed at examining the efficacy of oregovomab plus non-platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with PARPi/platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. The primary end point was the objective response rate, according to RECIST 1.1.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05407584 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy have a high risk of recurrence even with neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab. Sacituzumab govitecan, a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate with a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload, improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in patients with pre-treated metastatic TNBC. Moreover, preclinical data suggest that topoisomerase I inhibitors may enhance the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors through activation of the cGAS-STING pathway. Here we describe the international randomized phase III AFT-65/ASCENT-05/OptimICE-RD trial, which evaluates the efficacy and safety of sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician's choice (pembrolizumab ± capecitabine) among patients with early-stage TNBC with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05633654 (ClinicalTrials.gov)Other Study ID Number(s): Gilead Study ID: GS-US-595-6184Registration date: 1 December 2022Study start date: 12 December 2022Recruitment status: Recruiting.

Aim: To describe real-world biomarker testing, treatment and survival in stage IA-IIIC non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Electronic records of USA-based patients in the CancerLinQ Discovery^® database with stage IA-IIIC NSCLC (diagnosed between 2014 and 2018) were screened; a curated cohort of 14,452 records was identified for further analysis. Results: Of 3121 (21.6%) patients who had EGFR testing, 493 (15.8%) were EGFR-mutation positive. Of 974 patients who underwent surgical resection, 513 (52.7%) received adjuvant therapy. A quarter of patients with EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC received targeted adjuvant therapy. Conclusion: Approximately a fifth of patients underwent EGFR testing; biomarker testing is important to ensure optimal outcomes for patients with stage I-III NSCLC.

The 7th Symposium on Primary Breast Cancer in Older Women, hosted by the University of Nottingham in association with the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG), was held in the Jubilee Conference Centre in Nottingham on 1 March 2024. With the theme of 'involving the caregivers', topics included: barriers to clinical trial participation among older women, the use of geriatric assessment tools to tailor treatments to individual patient's level of frailty and interventions such as medication review and de-prescription to reduce toxicity and increase compliance with treatment.The symposium began with an upbeat introduction from the symposium chair, Kwok-Leung Cheung (Professor of Breast Surgery and Medical Education, University of Nottingham, Consultant Breast Surgeon, Royal Derby Hospital; UK National Representative, SIOG). Cheung welcomed attendees and contributors from a wide range of disciplines including surgeons, geriatricians, clinical nurse specialists, pharmacists and patient representatives.Cheung outlined how this biennial symposium, the only one of its kind to focus on primary breast cancer in older women, had grown in both size and ambition since its inception in 2010. For the first time, this year's proceedings included a dedicated multidisciplinary team discussion of geriatric breast cancer cases submitted by delegates.The main theme of the day's proceedings "involving the caregivers" was also emphasized in the introductory comments.