{"title":"Plain language summary and patient perspective of the 2020 lung cancer screening recommendations by the US Preventive Services Task Force.","authors":"Rachel Jenkins, Joanne Walker, Upal Basu Roy, Jill Feldman","doi":"10.2217/fon-2022-1235","DOIUrl":"10.2217/fon-2022-1235","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9146317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-05DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2355078
Antoine Mouawad, Sofia Habib, Marc Boutros, Fouad Attieh, Hampig Raphaël Kourie
Aim: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a very aggressive type of cancer, in which targeted therapies have not yet been fully utilized. KRAS wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma tumors are associated with different genomic alterations in comparison to KRAS mutated pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Objective: This systematic review aims to provide a one-stop summary of all these alterations, their proposed targeted treatment and their effect on disease progression. Methods: An electronic search strategy was elaborated in the PubMed database between 2020 and January 2024. Results: 21 studies were included, and we found that the most frequent targetable genomic alterations in KRAS wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma were BRAF, EGFR, FGFR, MSI-H/dMMR, Her2/ERBB2 amplification, BRCA1/2 and other HRDs, and gene fusions like ALK, NTRK and NRG1.
{"title":"How to find a needle in a haystack: a systematic review on targeting KRAS wild-type pancreatic cancer.","authors":"Antoine Mouawad, Sofia Habib, Marc Boutros, Fouad Attieh, Hampig Raphaël Kourie","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2024.2355078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2024.2355078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a very aggressive type of cancer, in which targeted therapies have not yet been fully utilized. <i>KRAS</i> wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma tumors are associated with different genomic alterations in comparison to <i>KRAS</i> mutated pancreatic adenocarcinoma. <b>Objective:</b> This systematic review aims to provide a one-stop summary of all these alterations, their proposed targeted treatment and their effect on disease progression. <b>Methods:</b> An electronic search strategy was elaborated in the PubMed database between 2020 and January 2024. <b>Results:</b> 21 studies were included, and we found that the most frequent targetable genomic alterations in <i>KRAS</i> wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma were <i>BRAF</i>, <i>EGFR</i>, <i>FGFR</i>, <i>MSI-H/dMMR</i>, <i>Her2/ERBB2</i> amplification, <i>BRCA1/2</i> and other HRDs, and gene fusions like <i>ALK</i>, <i>NTRK</i> and <i>NRG1</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141300404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-03DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2340960
Fabio Catalano, Matteo Brunelli, Alessio Signori, Pasquale Rescigno, Sebastiano Buti, Luca Galli, Massimiliano Spada, Cristina Masini, Francesca Galuppini, Valerio Gaetano Vellone, Gabriele Gaggero, Marco Maruzzo, Sara Merler, Francesca Vignani, Alessia Cavo, Davide Bimbatti, Michele Milella, Angelo Paolo Dei Tos, Marta Sbaraglia, Veronica Murianni, Alessandra Damassi, Malvina Cremante, Michele Maffezzoli, Miguel Angel Llaja Obispo, Giuseppe Luigi Banna, Giuseppe Fornarini, Sara Elena Rebuzzi
Introduction: The Meet-URO 18 study is a multicentric study of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab in the second-line and beyond, categorized as responders (progression-free survival ≥ 12 months) and non-responders (progression-free survival < 3 months). Areas covered: The current study includes extensive immunohistochemical analysis of T-lineage markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD8/CD4 ratio), macrophages (CD68), ph-mTOR, CD15 and CD56 expression on tumor cells, and PD-L1 expression, on an increased sample size including 161 tumor samples (113 patients) compared with preliminary presented data. Responders' tumor tissue (n = 90; 55.9%) was associated with lower CD4 expression (p = 0.014), higher CD56 expression (p = 0.046) and higher CD8/CD4 ratio (p = 0.030). Expert opinion/commentary: The present work suggests the regulatory role of a subpopulation of T cells on antitumor response and identifies CD56 as a putative biomarker of immunotherapy efficacy.
{"title":"Analyses of tumor microenvironment in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving immunotherapy (Meet-URO 18 study).","authors":"Fabio Catalano, Matteo Brunelli, Alessio Signori, Pasquale Rescigno, Sebastiano Buti, Luca Galli, Massimiliano Spada, Cristina Masini, Francesca Galuppini, Valerio Gaetano Vellone, Gabriele Gaggero, Marco Maruzzo, Sara Merler, Francesca Vignani, Alessia Cavo, Davide Bimbatti, Michele Milella, Angelo Paolo Dei Tos, Marta Sbaraglia, Veronica Murianni, Alessandra Damassi, Malvina Cremante, Michele Maffezzoli, Miguel Angel Llaja Obispo, Giuseppe Luigi Banna, Giuseppe Fornarini, Sara Elena Rebuzzi","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2024.2340960","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2024.2340960","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The Meet-URO 18 study is a multicentric study of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab in the second-line and beyond, categorized as <i>responders</i> (progression-free survival ≥ 12 months) and <i>non-responders</i> (progression-free survival < 3 months). <b>Areas covered:</b> The current study includes extensive immunohistochemical analysis of T-lineage markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD8/CD4 ratio), macrophages (CD68), ph-mTOR, CD15 and CD56 expression on tumor cells, and PD-L1 expression, on an increased sample size including 161 tumor samples (113 patients) compared with preliminary presented data. <i>Responders</i>' tumor tissue (n = 90; 55.9%) was associated with lower CD4 expression (<i>p</i> = 0.014), higher CD56 expression (<i>p</i> = 0.046) and higher CD8/CD4 ratio (<i>p</i> = 0.030). <b>Expert opinion/commentary:</b> The present work suggests the regulatory role of a subpopulation of T cells on antitumor response and identifies CD56 as a putative biomarker of immunotherapy efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141300398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-12-14DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0602
Tony Mok, Pasi A Jänne, Makoto Nishio, Silvia Novello, Martin Reck, Conor Steuer, Yi-Long Wu, Ronan Fougeray, Pang-Dian Fan, Jie Meng, David W Sternberg, Stephen Esker, Helena A Yu
After disease progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who are then treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) obtain only limited clinical benefit with transient responses. Therapies with greater efficacy and tolerable safety profiles are needed in this setting. The receptor tyrosine kinase HER3 is widely expressed in NSCLC, and increased expression is associated with poor treatment outcomes. In the U31402-A-U102 phase I trial, HER3-DXd showed promising antitumor activity with manageable safety in heavily pre-treated patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC across a range of tumor HER3 expression levels and EGFR TKI resistance mechanisms. HERTHENA-Lung02 is the first phase III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HER3-DXd versus PBC in patients with progression on a third-generation EGFR TKI. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05338970 (clinicaltrials.gov); 2021-005879-40 (EudraCT Number).
{"title":"HERTHENA-Lung02: phase III study of patritumab deruxtecan in advanced <i>EGFR</i>-mutated NSCLC after a third-generation EGFR TKI.","authors":"Tony Mok, Pasi A Jänne, Makoto Nishio, Silvia Novello, Martin Reck, Conor Steuer, Yi-Long Wu, Ronan Fougeray, Pang-Dian Fan, Jie Meng, David W Sternberg, Stephen Esker, Helena A Yu","doi":"10.2217/fon-2023-0602","DOIUrl":"10.2217/fon-2023-0602","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After disease progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, patients with <i>EGFR</i>-mutated NSCLC who are then treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) obtain only limited clinical benefit with transient responses. Therapies with greater efficacy and tolerable safety profiles are needed in this setting. The receptor tyrosine kinase HER3 is widely expressed in NSCLC, and increased expression is associated with poor treatment outcomes. In the U31402-A-U102 phase I trial, HER3-DXd showed promising antitumor activity with manageable safety in heavily pre-treated patients with <i>EGFR</i>-mutated NSCLC across a range of tumor HER3 expression levels and EGFR TKI resistance mechanisms. HERTHENA-Lung02 is the first phase III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HER3-DXd versus PBC in patients with progression on a third-generation EGFR TKI. <b>Clinical Trial Registration:</b> NCT05338970 (clinicaltrials.gov); 2021-005879-40 (EudraCT Number).</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"969-980"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138800828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-01-10DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0604
Xavier Leleu, Hans C Lee, Jeffrey A Zonder, Margaret Macro, Karthik Ramasamy, Cyrille Hulin, Jiri Silar, Matyas Kuhn, Kaili Ren, Nawal Bent-Ennakhil, Dasha Cherepanov, Dawn Marie Stull, Evangelos Terpos
Aim: We pooled data from three observational studies (INSIGHT MM, UVEA-IXA and REMIX) to investigate the real-world effectiveness of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Materials & methods: INSIGHT MM was a prospective study conducted in countries across Europe, Asia and North/Latin America while UVEA-IXA and REMIX were multicenter, retrospective/prospective studies conducted in Europe. Patients who had received IRd as ≥2nd line of therapy were analyzed. Primary outcomes were time-to-next treatment (TTNT) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Overall, 564 patients were included (median follow-up: 18.5 months). Median TTNT and PFS were 18.4 and 19.9 months; both outcomes were numerically longer for earlier versus later lines. Median treatment duration was 14.0 months. Overall response rate was 64.6%. No new safety concerns were noted. Conclusion: The effectiveness of IRd in routine practice appears similar to the efficacy observed in TOURMALINE-MM1. IRd benefit in earlier versus later lines was consistent with previous reports.
{"title":"INSURE: a pooled analysis of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory myeloma in routine practice.","authors":"Xavier Leleu, Hans C Lee, Jeffrey A Zonder, Margaret Macro, Karthik Ramasamy, Cyrille Hulin, Jiri Silar, Matyas Kuhn, Kaili Ren, Nawal Bent-Ennakhil, Dasha Cherepanov, Dawn Marie Stull, Evangelos Terpos","doi":"10.2217/fon-2023-0604","DOIUrl":"10.2217/fon-2023-0604","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> We pooled data from three observational studies (INSIGHT MM, UVEA-IXA and REMIX) to investigate the real-world effectiveness of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory myeloma. <b>Materials & methods:</b> INSIGHT MM was a prospective study conducted in countries across Europe, Asia and North/Latin America while UVEA-IXA and REMIX were multicenter, retrospective/prospective studies conducted in Europe. Patients who had received IRd as ≥2nd line of therapy were analyzed. Primary outcomes were time-to-next treatment (TTNT) and progression-free survival (PFS). <b>Results:</b> Overall, 564 patients were included (median follow-up: 18.5 months). Median TTNT and PFS were 18.4 and 19.9 months; both outcomes were numerically longer for earlier versus later lines. Median treatment duration was 14.0 months. Overall response rate was 64.6%. No new safety concerns were noted. <b>Conclusion:</b> The effectiveness of IRd in routine practice appears similar to the efficacy observed in TOURMALINE-MM1. IRd benefit in earlier versus later lines was consistent with previous reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"935-950"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139402579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-02-14DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0814
Peter J Goebell, Rutika Raina, Stephanie Chen, Sanika Rege, Ruchit Shah, Jamie Partridge Grossman, A Reginald Waldeck
Aim: To characterize real-world patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and treating physicians and evaluate treatment trends and baseline concordance versus guidelines internationally. Materials & methods: Retrospective, cross-sectional data from the Ipsos Global Oncology Monitor database 2018-2020 were used for descriptive analysis of mHSPC patients, treating physicians and treatment utilization. Results: Among the 6198 mHSPC patients from five countries, the most common treatment was either androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy or first-generation androgen receptor inhibitor + ADT. Second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor use was only initiating but increasing over the study period. Conclusion: Despite contemporaneous guidelines recommending treatment intensification of ADT in combination with novel antihormonals or docetaxel, 76.1% of reported mHSPC patients received non-guideline-concordant care.
{"title":"Real-world treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in the USA, Europe and Asia.","authors":"Peter J Goebell, Rutika Raina, Stephanie Chen, Sanika Rege, Ruchit Shah, Jamie Partridge Grossman, A Reginald Waldeck","doi":"10.2217/fon-2023-0814","DOIUrl":"10.2217/fon-2023-0814","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To characterize real-world patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and treating physicians and evaluate treatment trends and baseline concordance versus guidelines internationally. <b>Materials & methods:</b> Retrospective, cross-sectional data from the Ipsos Global Oncology Monitor database 2018-2020 were used for descriptive analysis of mHSPC patients, treating physicians and treatment utilization. <b>Results:</b> Among the 6198 mHSPC patients from five countries, the most common treatment was either androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy or first-generation androgen receptor inhibitor + ADT. Second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor use was only initiating but increasing over the study period. <b>Conclusion:</b> Despite contemporaneous guidelines recommending treatment intensification of ADT in combination with novel antihormonals or docetaxel, 76.1% of reported mHSPC patients received non-guideline-concordant care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"903-918"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139729387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-02-22DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0565
Andrea M Gross, Colette Achée, Sarah E Hart, Lindsay Brewer, Andrea Baldwin, Pamela L Wolters, Brigitte C Widemann
What is this summary about?: This summary describes a publication about a study called SPRINT. The SPRINT study included 50 children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and plexiform neurofibroma (PN) that could not be removed with surgery. PNs are tumors that grow along nerves and can cause various problems for children, such as pain, changes to appearance, and muscle weakness. In SPRINT, the study team wanted to learn whether a medication called selumetinib was able to shrink the PN caused by NF1 (also known as NF1-related PN), and if shrinking PNs helped relieve children of the problems caused by it. To assess how selumetinib might help, children had scans to measure the size of their PN, completed questionnaires, and had a variety of other tests done by their doctor. Their caregivers also completed questionnaires about their child. The children took selumetinib capsules twice a day on an empty stomach.
What were the results?: The results showed that selumetinib was able to shrink the PN for most children (68%). The results also showed that the problems caused by the children's PNs mostly improved while on selumetinib treatment. SPRINT also showed that the side effects of selumetinib were mainly mild and could be managed by doctors.
What do the results mean?: Before SPRINT, there were not many treatment options for children with NF1 and PN as there were no medications that had been shown to shrink PN, and surgery was not always possible. SPRINT showed that this medication shrinks most PNs and could help children with NF1 and PN. In April 2020, selumetinib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) because of the results of SPRINT. Selumetinib was the first and, as of February 2024, is the only medicine that can be prescribed by doctors to help children with NF1-related PN. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01362803 (SPRINT) (ClinicalTrials.gov).
{"title":"Selumetinib for children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and plexiform neurofibromas: A plain language summary of SPRINT.","authors":"Andrea M Gross, Colette Achée, Sarah E Hart, Lindsay Brewer, Andrea Baldwin, Pamela L Wolters, Brigitte C Widemann","doi":"10.2217/fon-2023-0565","DOIUrl":"10.2217/fon-2023-0565","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>What is this summary about?: </strong>This summary describes a publication about a study called SPRINT. The SPRINT study included 50 children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and plexiform neurofibroma (PN) that could not be removed with surgery. PNs are tumors that grow along nerves and can cause various problems for children, such as pain, changes to appearance, and muscle weakness. In SPRINT, the study team wanted to learn whether a medication called selumetinib was able to shrink the PN caused by NF1 (also known as NF1-related PN), and if shrinking PNs helped relieve children of the problems caused by it. To assess how selumetinib might help, children had scans to measure the size of their PN, completed questionnaires, and had a variety of other tests done by their doctor. Their caregivers also completed questionnaires about their child. The children took selumetinib capsules twice a day on an empty stomach.</p><p><strong>What were the results?: </strong>The results showed that selumetinib was able to shrink the PN for most children (68%). The results also showed that the problems caused by the children's PNs mostly improved while on selumetinib treatment. SPRINT also showed that the side effects of selumetinib were mainly mild and could be managed by doctors.</p><p><strong>What do the results mean?: </strong>Before SPRINT, there were not many treatment options for children with NF1 and PN as there were no medications that had been shown to shrink PN, and surgery was not always possible. SPRINT showed that this medication shrinks most PNs and could help children with NF1 and PN. In April 2020, selumetinib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) because of the results of SPRINT. Selumetinib was the first and, as of February 2024, is the only medicine that can be prescribed by doctors to help children with NF1-related PN. <b>Clinical Trial Registration</b>: NCT01362803 (SPRINT) (ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":"20 14","pages":"877-890"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141310517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-02-23DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0977
John M Kirkwood, Michele Del Vecchio, Jeffrey Weber, Christoph Hoeller, Jean-Jacques Grob, Peter Mohr, Carmen Loquai, Caroline Dutriaux, Vanna Chiarion-Sileni, Jacek Mackiewicz, Piotr Rutkowski, Petr Arenberger, Gaelle Quereux, Tarek M Meniawy, Paolo A Ascierto, Alexander M Menzies, Piyush Durani, Maurice Lobo, Federico Campigotto, Brian Gastman, Georgina V Long
What is this summary about?: In this article, we summarize results from the ongoing phase 3 CheckMate 76K clinical study published online in Nature Medicine in October 2023. The study goal was to learn whether nivolumab works as an adjuvant therapy (that is, helps to keep cancer from coming back when it is given after surgery) for stage 2 melanoma (skin cancer) that has not spread to other parts of the body. Nivolumab is an immunotherapy that activates a person's immune system so it can destroy cancer cells. In melanoma, staging describes the severity of the cancer. Melanoma staging ranges from 0 (very thin and confined to the upper layer of the skin) to 4 (spread to distant parts of the body), with earlier stages removed by surgery. The people in this study had stage 2 melanoma that had not spread to the lymph nodes or other organs in the body.
How was the study designed?: People 12 years and older with stage 2 melanoma that had not spread and had been removed by surgery were included in CheckMate 76K. People were randomly assigned to receive either nivolumab (526 patients) or placebo (264 patients). A placebo resembles the test medicine but does not contain any active medicines. The researchers assessed whether people who received nivolumab lived longer without their cancer returning and/or spreading to other parts of their bodies (compared with placebo) and if nivolumab was well tolerated.
What were the results?: Researchers found that people who received nivolumab were 58% less likely to have their cancer return and 53% less likely of having their cancer spread to distant parts of their body, compared with placebo. These reductions in risk with nivolumab were seen in different subgroups of people with a range of characteristics, and regardless of how deep the melanoma had gone into the skin. People taking nivolumab had more side effects than those taking placebo, but most were mild to moderate and manageable.
What do the results mean?: Results from CheckMate 76K support the benefit of using nivolumab as a treatment option for people with stage 2 melanoma post-surgery.
{"title":"Plain language summary of the CheckMate 76K study results: nivolumab given after stage 2B/2C melanoma is removed by surgery.","authors":"John M Kirkwood, Michele Del Vecchio, Jeffrey Weber, Christoph Hoeller, Jean-Jacques Grob, Peter Mohr, Carmen Loquai, Caroline Dutriaux, Vanna Chiarion-Sileni, Jacek Mackiewicz, Piotr Rutkowski, Petr Arenberger, Gaelle Quereux, Tarek M Meniawy, Paolo A Ascierto, Alexander M Menzies, Piyush Durani, Maurice Lobo, Federico Campigotto, Brian Gastman, Georgina V Long","doi":"10.2217/fon-2023-0977","DOIUrl":"10.2217/fon-2023-0977","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>What is this summary about?: </strong>In this article, we summarize results from the ongoing phase 3 CheckMate 76K clinical study published online in <i>Nature Medicine</i> in October 2023. The study goal was to learn whether nivolumab works as an adjuvant therapy (that is, helps to keep cancer from coming back when it is given after surgery) for stage 2 melanoma (skin cancer) that has not spread to other parts of the body. Nivolumab is an immunotherapy that activates a person's immune system so it can destroy cancer cells. In melanoma, staging describes the severity of the cancer. Melanoma staging ranges from 0 (very thin and confined to the upper layer of the skin) to 4 (spread to distant parts of the body), with earlier stages removed by surgery. The people in this study had stage 2 melanoma that had not spread to the lymph nodes or other organs in the body.</p><p><strong>How was the study designed?: </strong>People 12 years and older with stage 2 melanoma that had not spread and had been removed by surgery were included in CheckMate 76K. People were randomly assigned to receive either nivolumab (526 patients) or placebo (264 patients). A placebo resembles the test medicine but does not contain any active medicines. The researchers assessed whether people who received nivolumab lived longer without their cancer returning and/or spreading to other parts of their bodies (compared with placebo) and if nivolumab was well tolerated.</p><p><strong>What were the results?: </strong>Researchers found that people who received nivolumab were 58% less likely to have their cancer return and 53% less likely of having their cancer spread to distant parts of their body, compared with placebo. These reductions in risk with nivolumab were seen in different subgroups of people with a range of characteristics, and regardless of how deep the melanoma had gone into the skin. People taking nivolumab had more side effects than those taking placebo, but most were mild to moderate and manageable.</p><p><strong>What do the results mean?: </strong>Results from CheckMate 76K support the benefit of using nivolumab as a treatment option for people with stage 2 melanoma post-surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"959-968"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139930799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-01-08DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0271
Gary D Steinberg, Neal D Shore, Joan Palou Redorta, Matthew D Galsky, Jens Bedke, Ja Hyeon Ku, Michal Kretkowski, Hailong Hu, Konstantin Penkov, Jennifer J Vermette, Jamal C Tarazi, Alison E Randall, Kristen J Pierce, Daniel Saltzstein, Thomas B Powles
Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is the standard of care for patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). BCG in combination with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors may yield greater anti-tumor activity compared with either agent alone. CREST is a phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the subcutaneous PD-1 inhibitor sasanlimab in combination with BCG for patients with BCG-naive high-risk NMIBC. Eligible participants are randomized to receive sasanlimab plus BCG (induction ± maintenance) or BCG alone for up to 25 cycles within 12 weeks of TURBT. The primary outcome is event-free survival. Secondary outcomes include additional efficacy end points and safety. The target sample size is around 1000 participants.
{"title":"CREST: phase III study of sasanlimab and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-naïve high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Gary D Steinberg, Neal D Shore, Joan Palou Redorta, Matthew D Galsky, Jens Bedke, Ja Hyeon Ku, Michal Kretkowski, Hailong Hu, Konstantin Penkov, Jennifer J Vermette, Jamal C Tarazi, Alison E Randall, Kristen J Pierce, Daniel Saltzstein, Thomas B Powles","doi":"10.2217/fon-2023-0271","DOIUrl":"10.2217/fon-2023-0271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is the standard of care for patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). BCG in combination with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors may yield greater anti-tumor activity compared with either agent alone. CREST is a phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the subcutaneous PD-1 inhibitor sasanlimab in combination with BCG for patients with BCG-naive high-risk NMIBC. Eligible participants are randomized to receive sasanlimab plus BCG (induction ± maintenance) or BCG alone for up to 25 cycles within 12 weeks of TURBT. The primary outcome is event-free survival. Secondary outcomes include additional efficacy end points and safety. The target sample size is around 1000 participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"891-901"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139377461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}