Global Spine Journal最新文献

Study design: Narrative review of existing literature.

Objectives: Significant technological advancements in radiotherapy planning and delivery have enabled new radiotherapy techniques for the management of spine tumors. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive summary of these treatment techniques for practicing spine surgeons.

Methods: A narrative review of the existing literature on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and particle beam therapy (PBT) for the treatment of spine tumors was performed. The characteristics, implementation and evidence supporting these strategies in the management of primary spinal neoplasms were summarized.

Results: The clinical effectiveness of SBRT for the control and symptom palliation of metastatic spinal tumors are well demonstrated in multiple clinical trials. Risks such as fracture, radiculopathy and plexopathy exist after spine SBRT, necessitating an individualized approach in a well experienced multidisciplinary setting. SBRT should be considered a key component of a well-rounded treatment plan for metastatic spine tumors in combination with surgery, vertebral augmentation, and drug therapy, where indicated, to achieve optimal patient outcomes. Additionally, PBT and SBRT are also leading to promising results for primary spine tumors, though comparative effectiveness studies and prospective clinical trials are required to establish these modalities more formally as alternatives to conventionally fractionated photon radiotherapy.

Conclusions: SBRT and PBT are emerging as effective and well tolerated treatment options for primary and metastatic spine tumors. Additional investigation is needed to personalize these treatment options and further strengthen these approaches as key components in a multidisciplinary approach to the management of spinal neoplasms.

Study design: Narrative review.

Objectives: This article aims to provide a narrative review of the current state of research for liquid biopsy in spinal tumors and to discuss the potential application of liquid biopsy in the clinical management of patients with spinal tumors.

Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases, and the review was limited to articles of English language. All the relevant articles which were identified to be related to liquid biomarker study in spinal tumors, were studied in full text.

Results: Liquid biopsy has revolutionized the field of precision medicine by guiding personalized clinical management of cancer patients based on the liquid biomarker status. In recent years, more research has been done to investigate its potential utilization in patients with tumors from the spine. Herein, we review the liquid biomarkers that have been proposed in different spine malignancies including chordoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, astrocytoma and ependymoma. We also discuss the wide window of opportunity to utilize these liquid biomarkers in diagnosis, treatment response, monitoring, and detection of minimal residual disease in patients with spinal tumors.

Conclusions: Liquid biomarkers, especially blood-derived circulating tumor DNA, has a promising clinical utility as they are disease-specific, minimally invasive, and the procedure is repeatable. Prospective studies with larger populations are needed to fully establish its use in the setting of spinal tumors.

Study design: Narrative Review.

Objective: Contextualized by a narrative review of recent literature, we propose a wound complication prevention and management algorithm for spinal oncology patients. We highlight available strategies and motivate future research to identify optimal and individualized wound management for this population.

Methods: We conducted a search of recent studies (2010-2022) using relevant keywords to identify primary literature in support of current strategies for wound complication prevention and management following spine tumor surgery. When primary literature specific to spine tumor cases was not available, data were extrapolated from studies of other spine surgery populations. Results were compiled into a proposed clinical algorithm to guide practice considering available evidence.

Results: Based on available literature, we recommend individualized stratification of patients according to identifiable risk factors for wound complication and propose several interventions which might be employed preventatively, including intrawound antibiotic administration, negative pressure wound therapy, and primary flap closure of the surgical wound. Of these, the available evidence, weighing possible risks vs benefits, most strongly favors primary flap closure of surgical wounds, particularly for patients with multiple risk factors. A secondary algorithm to guide management of wound complications is also proposed.

Conclusions: Wound complications such as SSI and dehiscence remain a significant source of morbidity following spine tumor surgery. Triaging patients on an individualized basis according to risk factors for complication may aid in selecting appropriate prophylactic strategies to prevent these complications. Future research in this area is still needed to strengthen recommendations.

Study design: Systematic Review.

Objectives: Formalized terminology for pain experienced by spine cancer patients is lacking. The common descriptors of spine cancer pain as mechanical or non-mechanical is not exhaustive. Misdiagnosed spinal pain may lead to ineffective treatment recommendations for cancer patients.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of pain terminology that may be relevant to spinal oncology patients. We provide a comprehensive and unbiased summary of the existing evidence, not limited to the spine surgery literature, and subsequently consolidate these data into a practical, clinically relevant nomenclature for spine oncologists.

Results: Our literature search identified 3515 unique citations. Through title and abstract screening, 3407 citations were excluded, resulting in 54 full-text citations for review. Pain in cancer patients is typically described as nociceptive pain (somatic vs visceral), neurologic pain and treatment related pain.

Conclusions: We consolidate the terminology used in the literature and consolidated into clinically relevant nomenclature of biologic tumor pain, mechanical pain, radicular pain, neuropathic pain, and treatment related pain. This review helps standardize terminology for cancer-related pain which may help clinicians identify pain generators.

Study design: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: Scoring systems for metastatic disease of the spine are used to select patients for surgical treatment based on survival estimation, but it is unknown whether they can be used to predict the outcome of surgery. This study aims to investigate the association between two widely used prognostic scores and the neurologic function after surgery.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 204 patients with thoracolumbar metastases treated with decompressive surgery at Karolinska University Hospital (2001-2020). Modified Bauer and Tokuhashi scores were categorized based on surgical indication, and post-operative neurological function was assessed using the Frankel scale at two different post-surgery intervals.

Results: Modified Bauer scores ≥2 yielded higher late follow-up Frankel scores (3.9 ± 1.1) than scores <2 (3.5 ± 1.1), P = .03. Modified Tokuhashi scores ≥9 correlated with higher Frankel scores (4.5 ± .9) than scores <9 (3.5 ± 1.1), P < .0001. Both scoring systems positively predicted neurological outcomes at late follow-up, with odds ratios of 1.6 (P = .03) for Bauer and 9.2 (P < .0001) for Tokuhashi. However, only Tokuhashi predicted ambulatory function at late follow-up (P < .0001), demonstrating its utility in prognosticating post-surgical mobility.

Conclusion: Higher modified Bauer and Tokuhashi scores were associated with better neurologic function at last follow-up, as well as greater likelihood of being able to walk again. The Tokuhashi score was found to be more accurate than the modified Bauer score in predicting the neurological outcome after surgery.

Study design: Retrospective, cohort study.

Objectives: Hand function can be difficult to objectively assess perioperatively. In patients undergoing cervical spine surgery by a single-surgeon, we sought to: (1) use a hand dynamometer to report pre/postoperative grip strength, (2) distinguish grip strength changes in patients with radiculopathy-only vs myelopathy, and (3) assess predictors of grip strength improvement.

Methods: Demographic and operative data were collected for patients who underwent surgery 2015-2018. Hand dynamometer readings were pre/postoperatively at three follow-up time periods (0-3 m, 3-6 m, 6-12 m).

Results: 262 patients (mean age of 59 ± 14 years; 37% female) underwent the following operations: ACDF (80%), corpectomy (25%), laminoplasty (19%), and posterior cervical fusion (7%), with 81 (31%) patients undergoing multiple operations in a single anesthetic setting. Radiculopathy-only was seen in 128 (49%) patients, and myelopathy was seen 134 (51%) patients. 110 (42%) had improved grip strength by ≥10-lbs, including 69/128 (54%) in the radiculopathy-only group, and 41/134 (31%) in the myelopathy group. Those most likely to improve grip strength were patients undergoing ACDF (OR 2.53, P = .005). Patients less likely to improve grip strength were older (OR = .97, P = .003) and underwent laminoplasty (OR = .44, 95% CI .23, .85, P = .014). Patients undergoing surgery at the C2/3-C5/6 levels and C6/7-T1/2 levels both experienced improvement during the 0-3-month time range (C2-5: P = .035, C6-T2: P = .015), but only lower cervical patients experienced improvement in the 3-6-month interval (P = .030).

Conclusions: Grip strength significantly improved in 42% of patients. Patients with radiculopathy were more likely to improve than those with myelopathy. Patients undergoing surgery from the C2/3-C5/6 levels and the C6/7-T1/2 levels both significantly improved grip strength at 3-month postoperatively.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Objectives: Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) can be achieved with various techniques. Evidence supporting the long-term clinical advantages of one technique over another are inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the changes in sagittal parameters in the preoperative, intraoperative, and post-operative phase, (2) evaluate the radiographic maintenance of these parameters over time, and (3) compare the demographics and patient reported outcomes of patients undergoing various LIF techniques.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with degenerative spine disease undergoing single level anterior (ALIF), lateral (LLIF), posterior (PLIF), or transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion. Data collected included patient demographics and diagnosis at time of surgery. Upright lumbar radiographs taken pre-operatively, intra-operatively, and post-operatively were measured for lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), posterior disc height (PDH), and foraminal height (FH).

Results: 194 patients in a single center were included. PDH and FH increased intra-operatively following ALIF (P < .0001), PLIF (P < .0001), LLIF (P < .0001), and TLIF (P < .0001). SL also increased intra-operatively for ALIF (P = .002) and LLIF (P = .0007). Compared to intra-operative radiographs, PDH and FH decreased at latest post-operative phase for ALIF (P < .03), LLIF (P < .003), TLIF (P < .001), and PLIF (P < .005). SL decreased for ALIF (P = .0008), and TLIF (P = .02). LL did not change postoperatively across techniques. Patient reported outcomes improved post-surgically and disability index decreased, but neither differed between techniques.

Conclusion: LIF, regardless of technique, was shown to provide significant radiographic changes in PDH and FH. Techniques utilizing larger intervertebral cage sizes (ALIF/LLIF) improved SL. Single level LIF did not affect overall LL. No single technique displayed superior radiographic robustness over time.