Pub Date : 2026-02-05DOI: 10.1177/21925682261424530
Christopher Sollenberger, Albert Q Wu, Zachary Hoglund, Varun G Kathawate, William Welch, Ali Ozturk, John Shin, Brendan F Judy
Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectivesTo compare 1-year postoperative outcomes and complication rates between single-level lumbar laminectomy and hemilaminectomy using a large, multicenter, propensity-matched dataset.MethodsWe queried the TriNetX global health research network (≥160 million patients) for adults undergoing single-level lumbar decompression between January 2005 and July 2025. Cohorts were defined by CPT codes: laminectomy and hemilaminectomy, with qualifying diagnoses of lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, or radiculopathy. Patients with fusion, prior lumbar surgery, or non-degenerative pathology were excluded. Outcomes included new postoperative events within 1 year: mortality, weakness, pain, sensory loss, cauda equina syndrome, radiculopathy, foot drop, CSF leak, and surgical-site infection. Propensity-score matching balanced demographics and comorbidities. Cox proportional hazards models, Kaplan-Meier curves, and relative risks were calculated.ResultsOf 167,177 patients, 80,440 underwent laminectomy and 86,737 hemilaminectomy. After matching, 50,853 patients per cohort were analyzed. One-year mortality was similar (0.57% vs 0.49%, HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.01-1.42; P = 0.045). Laminectomy conferred significantly higher risks of CSF leak (1.41% vs 1.00%; RR 1.41), surgical-site infection (1.45% vs 1.00%; RR 1.45), cauda equina syndrome (0.36% vs 0.22%; RR 1.62), and persistent weakness (4.12% vs 3.67%; RR 1.12). Persistent radiculopathy was modestly less frequent after laminectomy (10.5% vs 12.0%; RR 0.87). Other outcomes, including pain and foot drop, were comparable.ConclusionsHemilaminectomy was associated with lower perioperative complication rates compared to laminectomy, while laminectomy provided a modest reduction in persistent radiculopathy. These findings highlight a tradeoff between safety and decompressive efficacy, emphasizing the importance of patient-specific surgical selection.
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的通过一个大型、多中心、倾向匹配的数据集,比较单节段腰椎椎板切除术和半椎板切除术的1年术后结局和并发症发生率。方法:我们查询了TriNetX全球健康研究网络(≥1.6亿患者)在2005年1月至2025年7月期间接受单节段腰椎减压术的成年人。通过CPT代码定义队列:椎板切除术和半椎板切除术,诊断为腰椎间盘突出、椎管狭窄、脊椎滑脱或神经根病。排除融合、既往腰椎手术或非退行性病理的患者。结果包括1年内新的术后事件:死亡率、虚弱、疼痛、感觉丧失、马尾综合征、神经根病、足下垂、脑脊液泄漏和手术部位感染。倾向得分匹配平衡人口统计学和合并症。计算Cox比例风险模型、Kaplan-Meier曲线和相对风险。结果167,177例患者中,80,440例行椎板切除术,86,737例行半椎板切除术。匹配后,每个队列分析50,853例患者。一年死亡率相似(0.57% vs 0.49%, HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.01-1.42; P = 0.045)。椎板切除术导致脑脊液泄漏(1.41% vs 1.00%; RR 1.41)、手术部位感染(1.45% vs 1.00%; RR 1.45)、马尾综合征(0.36% vs 0.22%; RR 1.62)和持续虚弱(4.12% vs 3.67%; RR 1.12)的风险显著增加。椎板切除术后持续性神经根病的发生率略低(10.5% vs 12.0%; RR 0.87)。其他结果,包括疼痛和足下垂,具有可比性。结论与椎板切除术相比,椎板切除术的围手术期并发症发生率较低,而椎板切除术可适度减少持续性神经根病。这些发现强调了安全性和减压效果之间的权衡,强调了患者特异性手术选择的重要性。
{"title":"Comparative Outcomes of Single-Level Lumbar Laminectomy versus Hemilaminectomy: A Retrospective TriNetX Analysis.","authors":"Christopher Sollenberger, Albert Q Wu, Zachary Hoglund, Varun G Kathawate, William Welch, Ali Ozturk, John Shin, Brendan F Judy","doi":"10.1177/21925682261424530","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682261424530","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectivesTo compare 1-year postoperative outcomes and complication rates between single-level lumbar laminectomy and hemilaminectomy using a large, multicenter, propensity-matched dataset.MethodsWe queried the TriNetX global health research network (≥160 million patients) for adults undergoing single-level lumbar decompression between January 2005 and July 2025. Cohorts were defined by CPT codes: laminectomy and hemilaminectomy, with qualifying diagnoses of lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, or radiculopathy. Patients with fusion, prior lumbar surgery, or non-degenerative pathology were excluded. Outcomes included new postoperative events within 1 year: mortality, weakness, pain, sensory loss, cauda equina syndrome, radiculopathy, foot drop, CSF leak, and surgical-site infection. Propensity-score matching balanced demographics and comorbidities. Cox proportional hazards models, Kaplan-Meier curves, and relative risks were calculated.ResultsOf 167,177 patients, 80,440 underwent laminectomy and 86,737 hemilaminectomy. After matching, 50,853 patients per cohort were analyzed. One-year mortality was similar (0.57% vs 0.49%, HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.01-1.42; <i>P</i> = 0.045). Laminectomy conferred significantly higher risks of CSF leak (1.41% vs 1.00%; RR 1.41), surgical-site infection (1.45% vs 1.00%; RR 1.45), cauda equina syndrome (0.36% vs 0.22%; RR 1.62), and persistent weakness (4.12% vs 3.67%; RR 1.12). Persistent radiculopathy was modestly less frequent after laminectomy (10.5% vs 12.0%; RR 0.87). Other outcomes, including pain and foot drop, were comparable.ConclusionsHemilaminectomy was associated with lower perioperative complication rates compared to laminectomy, while laminectomy provided a modest reduction in persistent radiculopathy. These findings highlight a tradeoff between safety and decompressive efficacy, emphasizing the importance of patient-specific surgical selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682261424530"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875885/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146124715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Study DesignBasic Science Study.ObjectivesTo determine the impact of rod composition and bending method on metal debris production during fatigue testing of posterolateral lumbar fusion constructs.MethodsPosterolateral lumbar fusion constructs were embedded into Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMW-PE) blocks and subject to fatigue testing, following a modified ASTM F1717-21 protocol including cycles of compression with novel axial rotation. Variations in constructs included rod bending methods of pre-bent (PB) and surgeon-bent (SB) and rod compositions of titanium alloy (Ti) or cobalt chromium alloy (CC). Constructs were wrapped in lactated ringer solution-soaked cotton, which was dissolved and analyzed for metal particulate using inductively coupled mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).ResultsMetal debris produced by surgeon-bent cobalt chromium and pre-bent cobalt chromium constructs did not have significant differences in quantity or quality. Pre-bent cobalt chromium alloy rods produced a larger amount of chromium and cobalt metal debris than pre-bent titanium alloy rods.ConclusionsWe find that cobalt chromium alloy rods produce more metal debris than titanium alloy rods. We find no evidence that rod bending method affects metal debris quality or quantity. In considering factors that impact susceptibility to corrosion and metallosis, our data supports that rod composition, but not bending method, contributes significantly to metal debris production.
{"title":"The Effects of Rod Bending Method and Metal Type on Fatigue Strength and Corrosion in Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion.","authors":"Samantha Corman, Yumeng Gao, Nicole DeVries Watson, Doug Fredericks, Catherine Olinger","doi":"10.1177/21925682261422665","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682261422665","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignBasic Science Study.ObjectivesTo determine the impact of rod composition and bending method on metal debris production during fatigue testing of posterolateral lumbar fusion constructs.MethodsPosterolateral lumbar fusion constructs were embedded into Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMW-PE) blocks and subject to fatigue testing, following a modified ASTM F1717-21 protocol including cycles of compression with novel axial rotation. Variations in constructs included rod bending methods of pre-bent (PB) and surgeon-bent (SB) and rod compositions of titanium alloy (Ti) or cobalt chromium alloy (CC). Constructs were wrapped in lactated ringer solution-soaked cotton, which was dissolved and analyzed for metal particulate using inductively coupled mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).ResultsMetal debris produced by surgeon-bent cobalt chromium and pre-bent cobalt chromium constructs did not have significant differences in quantity or quality. Pre-bent cobalt chromium alloy rods produced a larger amount of chromium and cobalt metal debris than pre-bent titanium alloy rods.ConclusionsWe find that cobalt chromium alloy rods produce more metal debris than titanium alloy rods. We find no evidence that rod bending method affects metal debris quality or quantity. In considering factors that impact susceptibility to corrosion and metallosis, our data supports that rod composition, but not bending method, contributes significantly to metal debris production.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682261422665"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875886/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146124751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.1177/21925682261422212
Ahmad Shafi Antar
{"title":"Letter to \"Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cost and Patient-Centered Outcomes in the United States\".","authors":"Ahmad Shafi Antar","doi":"10.1177/21925682261422212","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682261422212","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682261422212"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875889/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146118754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.1177/21925682261423475
Mitchell K Ng, Leonidas E Mastrokostas, Paul G Mastrokostas, Anton J Cristofoli, Matthew W Xie, Gregorio Baek, Sean Inzerillo, Luke B Schwartz, Rajendra Singh, Mohamed Said, Matthew Meade, Afshin E Razi, Andrew P Alvarez, Jeffrey A Rihn, Mark F Kurd, Ian David Kaye, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Gregory D Schroeder, Christopher K Kepler, Thomas D Cha
Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo update national estimates of in-hospital mortality after lumbar fusion, characterize when deaths occur during hospitalization, and identify independent predictors of mortality.MethodsAdult (≥18 years) lumbar fusion hospitalizations in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2022 were analyzed. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital-day timing of death and survivor-decedent comparisons of comorbidity and perioperative complication profiles. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors (P < 0.05).ResultsAmong 1,181,465 weighted admissions, mortality was 0.11% (1290 deaths) and occurred early (approximately 50% within 7 days; >90% by ∼ 30 days). Decedents more often underwent multilevel fusion (67.8% vs 38.8%, P < 0.001), were aged ≥75 years (41.5% vs 16.5%, P < 0.001), and had higher comorbidity burden (mean Elixhauser count 3.92 vs 2.15, P < 0.001). Independent predictors included age ≥75 years (OR 4.49, P = 0.003), multilevel fusion (OR 2.09, P < 0.001), congestive heart failure (OR 4.46, P < 0.001), coagulopathy (OR 3.44, P < 0.001), neurologic disorders (OR 9.27, P < 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (OR 1.61, P = 0.031), and higher comorbidity count (per-point OR 1.16, P = 0.010). Female sex (OR 0.72, P = 0.022) and highest income quartile (OR 0.58, P = 0.009) were protective.ConclusionsIn-hospital mortality after lumbar fusion is uncommon but concentrates early and disproportionately affects older, medically complex patients undergoing multilevel procedures, supporting preoperative counseling, front-loaded perioperative risk stratification, and heightened early postoperative vigilance.
研究设计回顾性队列研究。目的更新腰椎融合术后住院死亡率的全国估计,确定住院期间发生死亡的特征,并确定死亡率的独立预测因素。方法分析2016 - 2022年全国住院患者样本(NIS)中成人(≥18岁)腰椎融合术住院情况。主要终点是住院死亡率。次要结局包括住院日死亡时间、合并症和围手术期并发症的生存-死亡比较。多变量logistic回归确定了独立预测因子(P < 0.05)。结果在1,181,465例加权入院患者中,死亡率为0.11%(1290例死亡),发生在早期(约50%发生在7天内,90%发生在~ 30天内)。死者多行多节段融合(67.8% vs 38.8%, P < 0.001),年龄≥75岁(41.5% vs 16.5%, P < 0.001),合并症负担较高(平均Elixhauser计数3.92 vs 2.15, P < 0.001)。独立预测因素包括年龄≥75岁(OR 4.49, P = 0.003)、多段融合(OR 2.09, P < 0.001)、充血性心力衰竭(OR 4.46, P < 0.001)、凝血功能障碍(OR 3.44, P < 0.001)、神经系统疾病(OR 9.27, P < 0.001)、外周血管疾病(OR 1.61, P = 0.031)和较高的合并症计数(per point OR 1.16, P = 0.010)。女性性别(OR 0.72, P = 0.022)和最高收入四分位数(OR 0.58, P = 0.009)具有保护作用。结论腰椎融合术后院内死亡并不常见,但主要集中在早期且不成比例地影响年龄较大、医学复杂的多节段手术患者,支持术前咨询、术前围手术期风险分层和术后早期提高警惕。
{"title":"In-Hospital Mortality After Lumbar Fusion is Rare But Occurs Early: A Nationwide Analysis of Risk Factors, 2016-2022.","authors":"Mitchell K Ng, Leonidas E Mastrokostas, Paul G Mastrokostas, Anton J Cristofoli, Matthew W Xie, Gregorio Baek, Sean Inzerillo, Luke B Schwartz, Rajendra Singh, Mohamed Said, Matthew Meade, Afshin E Razi, Andrew P Alvarez, Jeffrey A Rihn, Mark F Kurd, Ian David Kaye, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Gregory D Schroeder, Christopher K Kepler, Thomas D Cha","doi":"10.1177/21925682261423475","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682261423475","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo update national estimates of in-hospital mortality after lumbar fusion, characterize when deaths occur during hospitalization, and identify independent predictors of mortality.MethodsAdult (≥18 years) lumbar fusion hospitalizations in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2022 were analyzed. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital-day timing of death and survivor-decedent comparisons of comorbidity and perioperative complication profiles. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors (<i>P</i> < 0.05).ResultsAmong 1,181,465 weighted admissions, mortality was 0.11% (1290 deaths) and occurred early (approximately 50% within 7 days; >90% by ∼ 30 days). Decedents more often underwent multilevel fusion (67.8% vs 38.8%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), were aged ≥75 years (41.5% vs 16.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and had higher comorbidity burden (mean Elixhauser count 3.92 vs 2.15, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Independent predictors included age ≥75 years (OR 4.49, <i>P</i> = 0.003), multilevel fusion (OR 2.09, <i>P</i> < 0.001), congestive heart failure (OR 4.46, <i>P</i> < 0.001), coagulopathy (OR 3.44, <i>P</i> < 0.001), neurologic disorders (OR 9.27, <i>P</i> < 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (OR 1.61, <i>P</i> = 0.031), and higher comorbidity count (per-point OR 1.16, <i>P</i> = 0.010). Female sex (OR 0.72, <i>P</i> = 0.022) and highest income quartile (OR 0.58, <i>P</i> = 0.009) were protective.ConclusionsIn-hospital mortality after lumbar fusion is uncommon but concentrates early and disproportionately affects older, medically complex patients undergoing multilevel procedures, supporting preoperative counseling, front-loaded perioperative risk stratification, and heightened early postoperative vigilance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682261423475"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12872424/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146118764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.1177/21925682261424224
Sara Edman, Jessica Lindberg, Pedram Tabatabaei, Catharina Parai, Olof Westin, Oskar Hemmingsson, Sead Crnalic, Johan Wänman
Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveSpinal metastases are common in patients with breast cancer, and accurate estimation of postoperative survival is crucial for selecting appropriate candidates for metastasis surgery. This study investigated the association between breast cancer subtype, according to the St. Gallen classification, and survival after surgery for spinal metastases with the aim of improving prognostic assessment and supporting informed patient counselling.MethodsThis study included 110 patients with breast cancer who underwent surgery for spinal metastases identified from the Swedish Spine Register and the Swedish National Quality Register of Breast Cancer. Patients were categorized in terms of the breast cancer subtype according to the St. Gallen classification. Postoperative survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and a Cox proportional hazards model.Results: The overall median survival following spinal surgery was 25 months (95% CI 19-31), while the median postoperative survival by subtype was 39 months (95% CI 28-50) for luminal A patients, 20 months (95% CI 9-31) for luminal B patients, and 48 months (95% CI 20-76) for luminal B/HER2+ patients. The median survival was not reached for the nonluminal HER2+ group, whereas patients with triple-negative breast cancer had a median survival of only 5 months (95% CI 4-6). The St. Gallen subtype was significantly associated with postoperative survival according to univariable (P<0.001) and multivariable analyses (P = 0.011).ConclusionsBreast cancer subtype according to the St. Gallen classification was significantly associated with survival after surgery for spinal metastases. These findings indicate that the St. Gallen classification may serve as a valuable prognostic tool in the metastatic spine setting. Incorporation of molecular subtype information may improve estimation of postoperative survival and support informed patient counselling, expectation management, and individualized surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer spinal metastases.
研究设计回顾性队列研究。目的:在乳腺癌患者中,气道转移是很常见的,准确估计术后生存率对于选择合适的转移手术患者至关重要。根据St. Gallen分类,本研究调查了乳腺癌亚型与脊柱转移术后生存率之间的关系,目的是改善预后评估和支持知情的患者咨询。方法本研究纳入了110例在瑞典脊柱登记和瑞典国家乳腺癌质量登记中确认的因脊柱转移而接受手术的乳腺癌患者。根据St. Gallen分类,将患者按乳腺癌亚型进行分类。术后生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier估计和Cox比例风险模型。结果:脊柱手术后的总中位生存期为25个月(95% CI 19-31),而腔道A患者的中位术后生存期为39个月(95% CI 28-50),腔道B患者的中位术后生存期为20个月(95% CI 9-31),腔道B/HER2+患者的中位术后生存期为48个月(95% CI 20-76)。非腔内HER2+组的中位生存期未达到,而三阴性乳腺癌患者的中位生存期仅为5个月(95% CI 4-6)。St. Gallen亚型与术后生存显著相关(PP = 0.011)。结论根据St. Gallen分类的乳腺癌亚型与脊柱转移术后生存率显著相关。这些发现表明,St. Gallen分类可以作为转移性脊柱设置的有价值的预后工具。结合分子亚型信息可以提高对乳腺癌脊柱转移患者术后生存的估计,并支持知情的患者咨询、期望管理和个体化手术决策。
{"title":"The St. Gallen Classification of Breast Cancer Subtype and Its Association with Survival After Surgery for Spinal Metastases.","authors":"Sara Edman, Jessica Lindberg, Pedram Tabatabaei, Catharina Parai, Olof Westin, Oskar Hemmingsson, Sead Crnalic, Johan Wänman","doi":"10.1177/21925682261424224","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682261424224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveSpinal metastases are common in patients with breast cancer, and accurate estimation of postoperative survival is crucial for selecting appropriate candidates for metastasis surgery. This study investigated the association between breast cancer subtype, according to the St. Gallen classification, and survival after surgery for spinal metastases with the aim of improving prognostic assessment and supporting informed patient counselling.MethodsThis study included 110 patients with breast cancer who underwent surgery for spinal metastases identified from the Swedish Spine Register and the Swedish National Quality Register of Breast Cancer. Patients were categorized in terms of the breast cancer subtype according to the St. Gallen classification. Postoperative survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and a Cox proportional hazards model.Results: The overall median survival following spinal surgery was 25 months (95% CI 19-31), while the median postoperative survival by subtype was 39 months (95% CI 28-50) for luminal A patients, 20 months (95% CI 9-31) for luminal B patients, and 48 months (95% CI 20-76) for luminal B/HER2+ patients. The median survival was not reached for the nonluminal HER2+ group, whereas patients with triple-negative breast cancer had a median survival of only 5 months (95% CI 4-6). The St. Gallen subtype was significantly associated with postoperative survival according to univariable (<i>P</i><0.001) and multivariable analyses (<i>P</i> = 0.011).ConclusionsBreast cancer subtype according to the St. Gallen classification was significantly associated with survival after surgery for spinal metastases. These findings indicate that the St. Gallen classification may serve as a valuable prognostic tool in the metastatic spine setting. Incorporation of molecular subtype information may improve estimation of postoperative survival and support informed patient counselling, expectation management, and individualized surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer spinal metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682261424224"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12872430/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146118834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.1177/21925682261423935
Vishwathsen Karthikeyan, Jefferson R Wilson, Aditya Vedantam
{"title":"Response to Letter to Editor for Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cost and Patient-Centered Outcomes in the United States.","authors":"Vishwathsen Karthikeyan, Jefferson R Wilson, Aditya Vedantam","doi":"10.1177/21925682261423935","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682261423935","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682261423935"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875888/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146118837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1177/21925682251414155
Alexander M Ballatori, Shane Shahrestani, Andy Ton, Xiao T Chen, Zorica Buser, Jeffrey Wang
{"title":"Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding \"New-Onset Psychiatric Disorders After Lumbar Fusion: Predictors, Timing, and Risk Stratification\".","authors":"Alexander M Ballatori, Shane Shahrestani, Andy Ton, Xiao T Chen, Zorica Buser, Jeffrey Wang","doi":"10.1177/21925682251414155","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682251414155","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251414155"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867717/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1177/21925682251414153
Matin Sarshivi, Mohammad Zare, Hossein Zare
{"title":"Letter to the Editor Regarding \"New-Onset Psychiatric Disorders After Lumbar Fusion: Predictors, Timing, and Risk Stratification\".","authors":"Matin Sarshivi, Mohammad Zare, Hossein Zare","doi":"10.1177/21925682251414153","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682251414153","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251414153"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867727/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1177/21925682261422708
Jens P Te Velde, Hester Zijlstra, Daniël de Reus, Robertus J B Pierik, Amanda S Xi, Ganesh M Shankar, Barend J van Royen, Diederik H R Kempen, Joseph H Schwab, Daniel G Tobert
Study DesignRetrospective multicenter cohort study.ObjectivesSpine surgery for multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with an increased intraoperative blood loss. Therefore, this study aims to examine prognostic factors for higher intraoperative blood loss in spine surgery for patients with MM.MethodsIn total, 158 adult patients with MM undergoing spine surgery between May 2001 and December 2021 were included. The main outcome for intraoperative blood loss was the Bleeding Index (BI), next to the visually estimated blood loss (EBL). Two separate multivariable generalized linear models (GLMs) were utilized to assess the associations between the predictors and these two outcomes.ResultsThe average BI was 4.4 and average EBL was 750 mL. Compared to corpectomy with stabilization, other types of surgery (decompression with stabilization, sole decompression, sole stabilization) were associated with a lower expected BI, ranging from a 26.5% to 39% decrease. A cervical location of surgery was associated with a 40.3% reduction of expected BI compared to a lumbar location (P = 0.006). Lower platelet count (P = 0.003) and longer duration of surgery (P < 0.001) were associated with a higher expected BI. For EBL, ECOG score, surgery type, and duration of surgery were found as independent predictors.ConclusionsThis study identified lower platelet count, type of surgery, location of operated spinal levels, and a longer duration of surgery as independent predictors of higher intraoperative BI in MBD-related spine surgery. These outcomes can be relevant for preoperative screening, shared decision making, and perioperative blood transfusion deliberation or planning.
{"title":"Prognostic Factors for High Intraoperative Blood Loss for Multiple Myeloma-Related Bone Disease in the Spine.","authors":"Jens P Te Velde, Hester Zijlstra, Daniël de Reus, Robertus J B Pierik, Amanda S Xi, Ganesh M Shankar, Barend J van Royen, Diederik H R Kempen, Joseph H Schwab, Daniel G Tobert","doi":"10.1177/21925682261422708","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682261422708","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective multicenter cohort study.ObjectivesSpine surgery for multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with an increased intraoperative blood loss. Therefore, this study aims to examine prognostic factors for higher intraoperative blood loss in spine surgery for patients with MM.MethodsIn total, 158 adult patients with MM undergoing spine surgery between May 2001 and December 2021 were included. The main outcome for intraoperative blood loss was the Bleeding Index (BI), next to the visually estimated blood loss (EBL). Two separate multivariable generalized linear models (GLMs) were utilized to assess the associations between the predictors and these two outcomes.ResultsThe average BI was 4.4 and average EBL was 750 mL. Compared to corpectomy with stabilization, other types of surgery (decompression with stabilization, sole decompression, sole stabilization) were associated with a lower expected BI, ranging from a 26.5% to 39% decrease. A cervical location of surgery was associated with a 40.3% reduction of expected BI compared to a lumbar location (<i>P</i> = 0.006). Lower platelet count (<i>P</i> = 0.003) and longer duration of surgery (<i>P</i> < 0.001) were associated with a higher expected BI. For EBL, ECOG score, surgery type, and duration of surgery were found as independent predictors.ConclusionsThis study identified lower platelet count, type of surgery, location of operated spinal levels, and a longer duration of surgery as independent predictors of higher intraoperative BI in MBD-related spine surgery. These outcomes can be relevant for preoperative screening, shared decision making, and perioperative blood transfusion deliberation or planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682261422708"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867737/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}