Genetic Epidemiology最新文献

The main goal of fine-mapping is the identification of relevant genetic variants that have a causal effect on some trait of interest, such as the presence of a disease. From a statistical point of view, fine mapping can be seen as a variable selection problem. Fine-mapping methods are often challenging to apply because of the presence of linkage disequilibrium (LD), that is, regions of the genome where the variants interrogated have high correlation. Several methods have been proposed to address this issue. Here we explore the ‘Sum of Single Effects’ (SuSiE) method, applied to real data (summary statistics) from a genome-wide meta-analysis of the autoimmune liver disease primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Fine-mapping in this data set was previously performed using the FINEMAP program; we compare these previous results with those obtained from SuSiE, which provides an arguably more convenient and principled way of generating ‘credible sets’, that is set of predictors that are correlated with the response variable. This allows us to appropriately acknowledge the uncertainty when selecting the causal effects for the trait. We focus on the results from SuSiE-RSS, which fits the SuSiE model to summary statistics, such as z-scores, along with a correlation matrix. We also compare the SuSiE results to those obtained using a more recently developed method, h2-D2, which uses the same inputs. Overall, we find the results from SuSiE-RSS and, to a lesser extent, h2-D2, to be quite concordant with those previously obtained using FINEMAP. The resulting genes and biological pathways implicated are therefore also similar to those previously obtained, providing valuable confirmation of these previously reported results. Detailed examination of the credible sets identified suggests that, although for the majority of the loci (33 out of 56) the results from SuSiE-RSS seem most plausible, there are some loci (5 out of 56 loci) where the results from h2-D2 seem more compelling. Computer simulations suggest that, overall, SuSiE-RSS generally has slightly higher power, better precision, and better ability to identify the true number of causal variants in a region than h2-D2, although there are some scenarios where the power of h2-D2 is higher. Thus, in real data analysis, the use of complementary approaches such as both SuSiE and h2-D2 is potentially warranted.

Many statistical genetics analysis methods make use of GWAS summary statistics. Best statistical practice requires evaluating these methods in realistic simulation experiments. However, simulating summary statistics by first simulating individual genotype and phenotype data is extremely computationally demanding. This high cost may force researchers to conduct overly simplistic simulations that fail to accurately measure method performance. Alternatively, summary statistics can be simulated directly from their theoretical distribution. Although this is a common need among statistical genetics researchers, no software packages exist for comprehensive GWAS summary statistic simulation. We present GWASBrewer, an open source R package for direct simulation of GWAS summary statistics. We show that statistics simulated by GWASBrewer have the same distribution as statistics generated from individual level data, and can be produced at a fraction of the computational expense. Additionally, GWASBrewer can simulate standard error estimates, something that is typically not done when sampling summary statistics directly. GWASBrewer is highly flexible, allowing the user to simulate data for multiple traits connected by causal effects and with complex distributions of effect sizes. We demonstrate example uses of GWASBrewer for evaluating Mendelian randomization, polygenic risk score, and heritability estimation methods.

Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) aim to uncover genotype–phenotype relationships through a two-stage procedure: predicting gene expression from genotypes using an expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) data set, then testing the predicted expression for trait associations. Accurate gene expression prediction in stage 1 is crucial, as it directly impacts the power to identify associations in stage 2. Currently, the first stage of such studies is primarily conducted using linear models like elastic net regression, which fail to capture the nonlinear relationships inherent in biological systems. Deep learning methods have the potential to model such nonlinear effects, but have yet to demonstrably outperform linear methods at this task. To address this gap, we propose a new deep learning architecture to predict gene expression from genotypic variation across individuals. Our method utilizes a learnable input scaling layer in conjunction with a convolutional encoder to capture nonlinear effects and higher-order interactions without compromising on interpretability. We further augment this approach to allow for parameter sharing across multiple networks, enabling us to utilize prior information for individual variants in the form of functional annotations. Evaluations on real-world genomic data show that our method consistently outperforms elastic net regression across a large set of heritable genes. Furthermore, our model statistically significantly improved predictive performance by leveraging functional annotations, whereas elastic net regression failed to show equivalent gains when using the same information, suggesting that our method can capture nonlinear functional information beyond the capability of linear models.

Many complex disorders are impacted by the interplay of genetic and environmental factors. In gene-environment interactions (GxE), an individual's genetic and epigenetic makeup impacts the response to environmental exposures. Understanding GxE can impact health at the individual, community, and population levels. The rapid expansion of GxE research in biomedical studies for complex diseases raises many unique ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSIs) that have not been extensively explored and addressed. This review article builds on discussions originating from a workshop held by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) in January 2022, entitled: “Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Gene-Environment Interaction Research.” We expand upon multiple key themes to inform broad recommendations and general guidance for addressing some of the most unique and challenging ELSI in GxE research. Key takeaways include strategies and approaches for establishing sustainable community partnerships, incorporating social determinants of health and environmental justice considerations into GxE research, effectively communicating and translating GxE findings, and addressing privacy and discrimination concerns in all GxE research going forward. Additional guidelines, resources, approaches, training, and capacity building are required to further support innovative GxE research and multidisciplinary GxE research teams.