Genetic Epidemiology最新文献

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have provided an abundance of information about the genetic variants and their loci that are associated to complex traits and diseases. However, due to linkage disequilibrium (LD) and noncoding regions of loci, it remains a challenge to pinpoint the causal genes. Gene network-based approaches, paired with network diffusion methods, have been proposed to prioritize causal genes and to boost statistical power in GWAS based on the assumption that trait-associated genes are clustered in a gene network. Due to the difficulty in mapping trait-associated variants to genes in GWAS, this assumption has never been directly or rigorously tested empirically. On the other hand, whole exome sequencing (WES) data focuses on the protein-coding regions, directly identifying trait-associated genes. In this study, we tested the assumption by leveraging the recently available exome-based association statistics from the UK Biobank WES data along with two types of networks. We found that almost all trait-associated genes were significantly more proximal to each other than randomly selected genes within both networks. These results support the assumption that trait-associated genes are clustered in gene networks, which can be further leveraged to boost the power of GWAS such as by introducing less stringent p value thresholds.

Gene–environment (GxE) interactions play a crucial role in understanding the complex etiology of various traits, but assessing them using observational data can be challenging due to unmeasured confounders for lifestyle and environmental risk factors. Mendelian randomization (MR) has emerged as a valuable method for assessing causal relationships based on observational data. This approach utilizes genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) with the aim of providing a valid statistical test and estimation of causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounders. MR has gained substantial popularity in recent years largely due to the success of genome-wide association studies. Many methods have been developed for MR; however, limited work has been done on evaluating GxE interaction. In this paper, we focus on two primary IV approaches: the two-stage predictor substitution and the two-stage residual inclusion, and extend them to accommodate GxE interaction under both the linear and logistic regression models for continuous and binary outcomes, respectively. Comprehensive simulation study and analytical derivations reveal that resolving the linear regression model is relatively straightforward. In contrast, the logistic regression model presents a considerably more intricate challenge, which demands additional effort.

Phenotypic heterogeneity at genomic loci encoding drug targets can be exploited by multivariable Mendelian randomization to provide insight into the pathways by which pharmacological interventions may affect disease risk. However, statistical inference in such investigations may be poor if overdispersion heterogeneity in measured genetic associations is unaccounted for. In this work, we first develop conditional F statistics for dimension-reduced genetic associations that enable more accurate measurement of phenotypic heterogeneity. We then develop a novel extension for two-sample multivariable Mendelian randomization that accounts for overdispersion heterogeneity in dimension-reduced genetic associations. Our empirical focus is to use genetic variants in the GLP1R gene region to understand the mechanism by which GLP1R agonism affects coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. Colocalization analyses indicate that distinct variants in the GLP1R gene region are associated with body mass index and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Multivariable Mendelian randomization analyses that were corrected for overdispersion heterogeneity suggest that bodyweight lowering rather than T2D liability lowering effects of GLP1R agonism are more likely contributing to reduced CAD risk. Tissue-specific analyses prioritized brain tissue as the most likely to be relevant for CAD risk, of the tissues considered. We hope the multivariable Mendelian randomization approach illustrated here is widely applicable to better understand mechanisms linking drug targets to diseases outcomes, and hence to guide drug development efforts.

Individual probabilistic assessments on the risk of cancer, primary or secondary, will not be understood by most patients. That is the essence of our arguments in this paper. Greater understanding can be achieved by extensive, intensive, and detailed counseling. But since probability itself is a concept that easily escapes our everyday intuition—consider the famous Monte Hall paradox—then it would also be wise to advise patients and potential patients, to not put undue weight on any probabilistic assessment. Such assessments can be of value to the epidemiologist in the investigation of different potential etiologies describing cancer evolution or to the clinical trialist as a way to maximize design efficiency. But to an ordinary individual we cannot anticipate that these assessments will be correctly interpreted.

Advancements in high-throughput genomic technologies have revolutionized the field of disease biomarker identification by providing large-scale genomic data. There is an increasing focus on understanding the relationships among diverse patient groups with distinct disease subtypes and characteristics. Complex diseases exhibit both heterogeneity and shared genomic factors, making it essential to investigate these patterns to accurately detect markers and comprehensively understand the diseases. Integrative analysis has emerged as a promising approach to address this challenge. However, existing studies have been limited by ignoring the adjacency structure of genomic measurements, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and DNA methylations. In this study, we propose a structured integrative analysis method that incorporates a spline type penalty to accommodate this adjacency structure. We utilize a fused lasso type penalty to identify both heterogeneity and commonality across the groups. Extensive simulations demonstrate its superiority compared to several direct competing methods. The analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas melanoma data with DNA methylation measurements and GENEVA diabetes data with SNP measurements exhibit that the proposed analysis lead to meaningful findings with better prediction performance and higher selection stability.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have led to rapid growth in detecting genetic variants associated with various phenotypes. Owing to a great number of publicly accessible GWAS summary statistics, and the difficulty in obtaining individual-level genotype data, many existing gene-based association tests have been adapted to require only GWAS summary statistics rather than individual-level data. However, these association tests are restricted to unrelated individuals and thus do not apply to family samples directly. Moreover, due to its flexibility and effectiveness, the linear mixed model has been increasingly utilized in GWAS to handle correlated data, such as family samples. However, it remains unknown how to perform gene-based association tests in family samples using the GWAS summary statistics estimated from the linear mixed model. In this study, we show that, when family size is negligible compared to the total sample size, the diagonal block structure of the kinship matrix makes it possible to approximate the correlation matrix of marginal Z scores by linkage disequilibrium matrix. Based on this result, current methods utilizing summary statistics for unrelated individuals can be directly applied to family data without any modifications. Our simulation results demonstrate that this proposed strategy controls the type 1 error rate well in various situations. Finally, we exemplify the usefulness of the proposed approach with a dental caries GWAS data set.

The use of polygenic risk score (PRS) models has transformed the field of genetics by enabling the prediction of complex traits and diseases based on an individual's genetic profile. However, the impact of genotype–environment interaction (GxE) on the performance and applicability of PRS models remains a crucial aspect to be explored. Currently, existing genotype–environment interaction polygenic risk score (GxE PRS) models are often inappropriately used, which can result in inflated type 1 error rates and compromised results. In this study, we propose novel GxE PRS models that jointly incorporate additive and interaction genetic effects although also including an additional quadratic term for nongenetic covariates, enhancing their robustness against model misspecification. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate that our proposed models outperform existing models in terms of controlling type 1 error rates and enhancing statistical power. Furthermore, we apply the proposed models to real data, and report significant GxE effects. Specifically, we highlight the impact of our models on both quantitative and binary traits. For quantitative traits, we uncover the GxE modulation of genetic effects on body mass index by alcohol intake frequency. In the case of binary traits, we identify the GxE modulation of genetic effects on hypertension by waist-to-hip ratio. These findings underscore the importance of employing a robust model that effectively controls type 1 error rates, thus preventing the occurrence of spurious GxE signals. To facilitate the implementation of our approach, we have developed an innovative R software package called GxEprs, specifically designed to detect and estimate GxE effects. Overall, our study highlights the importance of accurate GxE modeling and its implications for genetic risk prediction, although providing a practical tool to support further research in this area.

This research focuses on the interval estimation of the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome using the summary data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) method while accounting for the winner's curse caused by the selection of single nucleotide polymorphism instruments. This issue is understudied and is important as the point estimate is biased. Since Fieller's theorem and its variations are not suitable for constructing a confidence interval, we use the box method. This box method is known to be conservative and thus provides a lower bound on the coverage level. To assess the performance of the box method, we use simulation studies and compare it with the support interval we proposed earlier and the Wald interval derived from the SMR method. All three methods are applied to a study of causal genes for Alzheimer's disease. Overall, the box method presents an alternative for constructing interval estimates for a causal effect while addressing the winner's curse issue.

Mendelian randomization (MR) has become a popular tool for inferring causality of risk factors on disease. There are currently over 45 different methods available to perform MR, reflecting this extremely active research area. It would be desirable to have a standard simulation environment to objectively evaluate the existing and future methods. We present simmrd, an open-source software for performing simulations to evaluate the performance of MR methods in a range of scenarios encountered in practice. Researchers can directly modify the simmrd source code so that the research community may arrive at a widely accepted framework for researchers to evaluate the performance of different MR methods.

Rare-variants (RVs) genetic association studies enable researchers to uncover the variation in phenotypic traits left unexplained by common variation. Traditional single-variant analysis lacks power; thus, researchers have developed various methods to aggregate the effects of RVs across genomic regions to study their collective impact. Some existing methods utilize a static delineation of genomic regions, often resulting in suboptimal effect aggregation, as neutral subregions within the test region will result in an attenuation of signal. Other methods use varying windows to search for signals but often result in long regions containing many neutral RVs. To pinpoint short genomic regions enriched for disease-associated RVs, we developed a novel method, DYNamic Aggregation TEsting (DYNATE). DYNATE dynamically and hierarchically aggregates smaller genomic regions into larger ones and performs multiple testing for disease associations with a controlled weighted false discovery rate. DYNATE's main advantage lies in its strong ability to identify short genomic regions highly enriched for disease-associated RVs. Extensive numerical simulations demonstrate the superior performance of DYNATE under various scenarios compared with existing methods. We applied DYNATE to an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis study and identified a new gene, EPG5, harboring possibly pathogenic mutations.