Heart最新文献

Background: In patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR), delayed surgical intervention is associated with poor outcomes, particularly in advanced stages. This study aimed to assess whether earlier tricuspid valve (TV) surgery provides a survival benefit in patients with moderate to severe TR who are considered at low to intermediate risk of adverse clinical or surgical outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 10 016 patients diagnosed with moderate to severe TR between 2008 and 2020. Patients were stratified using the the Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcomes (TRIO) Score (for general health risk) and TRI-SCORE (for perioperative risk). We focused on patients deemed at low or intermediate risk by these scores, comparing the all-cause mortality of those who underwent TV surgery to those managed medically.

Results: Among 8874 patients categorised as low or intermediate risk, 871 (9.8%) underwent TV surgery. Patients in the surgical group were younger and had a higher prevalence of RV enlargement and RV dysfunction compared to those in the medical treatment group. During a mean follow-up of 5.2 years, surgical patients had a lower risk of death (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.50) compared with medically managed patients after adjusting for confounders. This association persisted in patients who underwent isolated TV surgery. However, the potential for residual confounding in this non-randomised analysis should be considered.

Conclusions: TV surgery was associated with higher survival rates in patients with moderate to severe TR and low to intermediate prognostic risk. However, the observational nature of the study means that uncontrolled confounding cannot be excluded. These findings warrant further investigation in randomised studies.

Background: Pathological mechanisms of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) are heterogeneous, with an unknown impact on prognosis, and often remain unrecognised in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic impact of pathological findings by invasive coronary angiography (ICA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and coronary function testing in MINOCA.

Methods: Studies published until August 2023 were searched on PubMed and SCOPUS and included if reporting the prevalence of patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries (NObs-CA; 1-49% coronary stenosis) versus normal coronary arteries (NCA; 0% coronary stenosis) by ICA, pathological findings by OCT, and/or coronary vasomotor tests in MINOCA. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. The pooled prevalence of pathological findings was estimated with random-effects models. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs of all-cause death, MI and the composite of both in patients with NObs-CA versus NCA were calculated at short-term (<1 month), 1-year and long-term follow-up (> 1 year).

Results: Forty-five studies including 17 539 patients were analysed. The pooled prevalence of NObs-CA at ICA was 53% (95% CI 0.47 to 0.60). OCT showed acute pathological findings in 62% (95% CI 0.44 to 0.78) of patients and coronary vasomotor tests were positive in 49% (95% CI 0.31 to 0.67). NObs-CA compared with NCA was associated with an increased 1-year risk of all-cause death or MI (RR=1.49 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.90)) and MI alone (RR=1.80 (95% CI 1.26 to 2.59)), whereas the risk of all-cause death was comparable. Similar results were seen at long-term, but not at short-term follow-up.

Conclusions: Stratification of MINOCA into NObs-CA versus NCA has prognostic value. OCT and vasospasm testing, often informative about the pathological mechanism of MINOCA, should be part of an invasive diagnostic algorithm.

Prospero registration number: CRD42023468183.

Background: Resveratrol, a dietary supplement that intervenes in cellular metabolism, has been shown to reduce aortic growth rate in a mouse model of Marfan syndrome (MFS), a condition associated in humans with life-threatening aortic complications, often preceded by aortic dilatation. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the effects of resveratrol on aortic growth rate in patients with MFS .

Methods: In this investigator-initiated, single-arm open-label multicentre trial, we analysed resveratrol treatment in adults aged 18-50 years with MFS. The primary endpoint was the change in estimated annual aortic growth at five predefined levels in the thoracic aorta after 1 year of resveratrol treatment, evaluated using a linear mixed model. Aortic diameters were measured by cardiac MRI at three time points to analyse the annual aortic expansion rate before and after initiation of treatment. Additionally, annual aortic growth was compared with growth in a previously conducted losartan randomised clinical trial.

Results: 898 patients were screened of which 19% (168/898) patients met the inclusion criteria.36% (61/168) patients signed informed consent and 93% (57/61) aged 37±9 years, of which 28 males (49%) were included in the final analysis of the study. 46% (26/57) had undergone aortic root replacement prior to the study. Aortic root diameters remained stable after 1.2±0.3 years of resveratrol administration. A trend towards a decrease in estimated growth rate (mm/year) was observed in the aortic root (from 0.39±0.06 to -0.13±0.23, p=0.072), ascending aorta (from 0.40±0.05 to -0.01±0.18, p=0.072) and distal descending aorta (from 0.32±0.04 to 0.01±0.14, p=0.072).

Conclusion: Resveratrol treatment for 1 year may stabilise the aortic growth rate in adult patients with MFS. However, a subsequent randomised clinical trial with a longer follow-up duration and a larger study cohort is needed to establish an actual long-term beneficial effect of this dietary supplement in patients with MFS.

Trial registration number: NL66127.018.18.

Background: Significant secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is known to be associated with worse prognosis. However, data focusing specifically on moderate SMR and associated risk factors are lacking. In the present study, clinical and echocardiographic parameters associated with outcomes were evaluated in a large cohort of patients with moderate SMR.

Methods: Patients with moderate SMR were retrospectively included and stratified by New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and specific aetiology (atrial SMR (aSMR) or ventricular SMR (vSMR)) with a further classification of vSMR based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40% or <40%. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and the secondary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) events.

Results: Of the total 1061 patients with moderate SMR (age 69±11 years, 59% male) included, 854 (80%) were in NYHA class I-II and 207 (20%) were in NYHA class III-IV. Regarding the aetiology, 352 (33%) had aSMR and 709 (67%) had vSMR, of which 329 (46%) had LVEF ≥40% and 380 (54%) had LVEF <40%. During a median follow-up of 82 (IQR 55-115) months, 397 (37%) died and 539 (51%) patients had HF events or died. On multivariable analysis, NYHA class III-IV (HR 1.578; 95% CI 1.244 to 2.002, p<0.001) and SMR aetiology were independently associated with both endpoints. Specifically, compared to aSMR, vSMR with LVEF ≥40% had a HR of 1.528 (95% CI 1.108 to 2.106, p=0.010) and vSMR with LVEF <40% had a HR of 1.960 (95% CI 1.434 to 2.679, p<0.001). To further support these findings, patients were matched for (1) NYHA class and (2) SMR aetiology by propensity scores including age, sex, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal function, left atrial volume index, NYHA class (only for SMR aetiology matching), LVEF, SMR aetiology (only for NYHA class matching), tricuspid regurgitation severity and right ventricular pulmonary artery coupling index. After matching, NYHA class and SMR aetiology remained associated with both outcomes (for both: log rank p<0.050).

Conclusion: In patients with moderate SMR, distinction in SMR aetiology and assessment of symptoms are important independent determinants of outcome.

Background: Oxygen therapy is commonly administered to patients with acute cardiovascular conditions during hospitalisation. Both hypoxaemia and hyperoxia can cause harm, making it essential to maintain oxygen saturation (SpO₂) within a target range. Traditionally, oxygen administration is manually controlled by nursing staff, guided by intermittent pulse oximetry readings. This study aimed to compare standard manual oxygen administration with automated oxygen administration (AOA) using the O2matic device.

Methods: In this randomised controlled trial, 60 patients admitted to a cardiac department with an acute cardiovascular condition requiring oxygen therapy were randomised to either standard care (manual oxygen administration) or AOA via the O2matic device. The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent within the desired SpO₂ range (92%-96% or 94%-98%) over 24 hours.

Results: Patients had a mean age of 75.8±12.4 years, with an average SpO₂ of 93%. Those in the AOA group (n=25) spent significantly more time within the target SpO₂ range (median 87.0% vs 60.6%, p<0.001) compared with the standard care group (n=28). Time spent below the desired SpO₂ range was significantly lower in the AOA group (7.9% vs 33.6%, p<0.001). No significant differences in time spent above the desired SpO₂ range were observed between the two groups.

Conclusions: AOA with the O2matic device is superior to standard manual control in maintaining SpO₂ within the target range in patients hospitalised with acute cardiovascular conditions. The automated systems significantly reduce the time spent in hypoxaemia without increasing hyperoxia.

Trial registration number: NCT05452863.

Background: New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) increases ischaemic stroke risk, yet factors influencing this risk remain unclear. We sought to identify factors associated with 1-year ischaemic stroke risk, compare the CHA₂DS₂-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75 years, Diabetes, previous Stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA), Vascular disease, Age 65-74 years, Sex category) and ATRIA (Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation) scores' predictive abilities for ischaemic stroke, and assess oral anticoagulation (OAC) dispensing at discharge in patients with POAF.

Methods: This nationwide cohort study used prospectively collected data from four mandatory Swedish national registries. All first-time isolated CABG patients who developed POAF during 2007-2020 were included. Multivariable logistic models were used to identify ischaemic stroke predictors and C-statistics to assess the predictive abilities of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc and ATRIA scores in patients without OAC. OAC dispensing patterns were described based on stroke-associated factors.

Results: In total, 10 435 patients with POAF were identified. Out of those not receiving OAC (n=6903), 3.1% experienced an ischaemic stroke within 1 year. Advancing age (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.86 per 10-year increase, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.38), prior ischaemic stroke (aOR 18.56, 95% CI 10.05 to 34.28 at 60 years, aOR 5.95, 95% CI 3.78 to 9.37 at 80 years, interaction p<0.001), myocardial infarction (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.10) and heart failure (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.21) were independently associated with ischaemic stroke. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.72 (0.69-0.76) and 0.74 (0.70-0.78) for CHA₂DS₂-VASc and ATRIA, respectively (p=0.021). Altogether, 71.0% of patients with a stroke risk >2%/year, according to the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, were not discharged on OAC.

Conclusions: Prior ischaemic stroke, advancing age, history of heart failure and myocardial infarction were associated with 1-year ischaemic stroke risk in patients with POAF after CABG. CHA₂DS₂-VASc and ATRIA scores predicted stroke risk with similar accuracy as in non-surgical atrial fibrillation cohorts. OAC dispense at discharge does not seem to reflect individual stroke risk.

Background: The diagnostic performance of non-invasive imaging techniques for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with a history of myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention has not been comprehensively evaluated. This meta-analysis assesses the diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography (CCTA), CCTA combined with CT perfusion (CCTA+CTP), cardiac MRI (CMR) and single-photon emission CT (SPECT) compared with invasive reference standards.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from 2005 to September 2022 for prospective, blinded studies including populations with ≥50% prior CAD.

Results: We identified 18 studies encompassing 3265 patients, with obstructive CAD present in 64%. The per-patient sensitivity of CCTA (0.95; 95% CI 0.92 to 0.98), CCTA+CTP (0.93; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.98) and CMR (0.91; 95% CI 0.86 to 0.94) was high, while SPECT showed lower sensitivity (0.63; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.73). SPECT had higher specificity compared with CCTA (0.66; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.76 vs 0.37; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.46), but was comparable to CCTA+CTP (0.59; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.69) and CMR (0.69; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.81). The area under the curve for SPECT was the lowest (0.70; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.87), while CCTA (0.91; 95% CI 0.86 to 0.98), CCTA+CTP (0.89; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.00) and CMR (0.91; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.00) showed similar high values.

Conclusions: In patients with prior CAD, CCTA, CCTA+CTP and CMR demonstrated high diagnostic performance, whereas SPECT had lower sensitivity. These findings can guide the selection of non-invasive imaging techniques in this high-risk population.

Prospero registration number: CRD42022322348.