HAND最新文献

Background: Considerable evidence supports corticosteroid injection as an effective treatment for trigger finger. One common side effect, the flare reaction, is a well-documented phenomenon of increased pain following steroid injections. Its incidence and intensity may be related to steroid composition. The purpose of this study was to determine whether betamethasone and methylprednisolone injections for trigger fingers have differing intensity of pain or incidence flare reaction.

Methods: Patients with symptomatic trigger finger were recruited during their hand surgery visits. Patients were randomized into 2 treatment groups: betamethasone (40 mg) and methylprednisolone (6 mg) mixed with lidocaine 1%. Treatment group assignment was blinded to the patients and investigators. Visual analog scale pain measurements were taken prior to injection, 5 minutes postinjection, and daily thereafter for 7 days.

Results: Sixty-four patients were randomized into the 2 treatment groups. Patients in the betamethasone group reported slightly higher baseline pain compared with the methylprednisolone group, but lower pain on day 1. None of the following days showed a statistically significant difference.

Conclusions: The incidence of flare and severe flare reactions of betamethasone injections for trigger finger management was roughly double that of methylprednisolone, but this difference was not statistically significant. Further studies are required to evaluate the relative course of nonflare postinjection pain for different corticosteroid injections for trigger finger injections.

Background: Upper extremity injuries account for 36.5% of presentations to the emergency department in the United States. This study seeks to determine current rates of upper extremity injuries that present to the emergency department and the injury characteristics of patients requiring admission.

Methods: National Electronic Injury Surveillance System was queried for a 10-year period for upper extremity injuries. Further analysis was done to evaluate specific patient demographics, injury characteristics, and mechanisms of injury of those patients who were admitted to the hospital.

Results: Between 2012 and 2021, 39 160 365 persons are estimated to have presented to 100 United States emergency departments for managing upper extremity injuries, accounting for 28.8% of total presentations. A total of 12 662 041 upper extremity patients were pediatric (32.3%). Admissions occurred in 4.6% of presentations. The most common presenting diagnosis was laceration (24.9%), while the most common admission diagnosis was fracture (49.7%). The majority had injuries involving their forearms (19.9%). The most common injury-associated consumer product group was stairs, ramps, landings, and floors at 28.5%. Of the 445 644 patients, those estimated to have been injured by stairs, ramps, landings, and floors adults were 429 435 or 96.4%. The most common injury-associated product in pediatric populations was playground equipment (23.6%), of which 53.7% was from monkey bars and other climbing apparatuses.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates an overall increase in admissions for upper extremity injuries in the setting of similar rates of overall upper extremity injuries with fractures and forearm being the most common diagnosis and body part involved, respectively.

Level of evidence: IV; Database.

Background: Perilunate injuries of carpal bones are uncommon, high-energy injuries that necessitate early diagnosis and appropriate management to prevent progressive carpal instability and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. A much more uncommon mechanism that starts from the lunotriquetral ligament and proceeds radially in an opposite direction than the classic mechanism may cause a reverse or ulnar-sided perilunate dislocation (PLD). The purposes were: (1) to present an uncommon case of greater arc reverse (ulnar-sided) perilunate fracture-dislocation (REPLFD); and (2) to conduct a systematic review (SR) to evaluate the current evidence on reverse perilunate injuries (REPLIs).

Methods: A novel pattern of injury of REPLFD with fractures of the ulnar styloid, triquetrum, and capitate is presented. A SR was conducted with primary outcome measures of the type of injury (pathoanatomy of lesions) and pathomechanics. Secondary outcome measures were choice of surgery and outcome on follow-up.

Results: The Murad's tool and modified Coleman Methodology Score revealed poor methodological quality of the available literature on REPLI. Evidence is lacking in the mechanism of injury and treatment of REPLI, especially regarding REPLFD.

Conclusions: The SR revealed poor methodological quality of the available literature and exposes that not all PLDs can be explained by the current existing pathomechanical injury classifications. However, following the management principles of perilunate injuries, REPLI tends to have good functional results with no major complications.

Level of evidence: Level V.

Background: The annual volume of carpal tunnel release (CTR) in the United States has been estimated to be 577 000 per year. Our objectives were to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for revision CTR within 1 year of primary CTR.

Methods: We identified all adult patients undergoing primary CTR from October 2015 to September 2019 in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. We used the CPT modifier codes to determine laterality of index and revision procedures. We estimated multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models to evaluate risk factors for revision CTR within 1 year.

Results: Of the 80 423 primary CTR procedures, 178 (0.22%) underwent a revision CTR within 1 year of the index surgery. The mean (SD) age of the entire cohort was 58.69 (14.43) years, 61.1% were women, 73.2% were non-Hispanic white, 42.9% were covered through private insurance, and 9.5% had diabetes mellitus. Workers' compensation insurance (odds ratio [OR] = 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.98, P = .02) and simultaneous bilateral CTR (OR = 14.91, 95% CI, 9.62-23.12, P < .001) were associated with revision CTR within 1 year of the index procedure. No models demonstrated an association between endoscopic technique or surgeon volume and revision CTR.

Conclusions: The incidence of revision CTR within 1 year was lower than that previously reported. Patients covered by workers' compensation and those undergoing simultaneous bilateral CTR had higher likelihood of a revision CTR within 1 year, whereas endoscopic technique and surgeon volume were not associated with revision CTR within 1 year.

Background: Patients with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are often admitted by the emergency department for intravenous antibiotic therapy and surgical drainage of abscesses if necessary. As part of the initial diagnostic workup, blood cultures are routinely drawn at our institution in patients with SSTIs. This study seeks to identify the utility of performing blood cultures in patients with upper extremity abscesses as it relates to the number of incision and drainage (I&D) procedures performed, patient readmission rates, and length of hospital stay.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of 314 patients aged 18 to 89 years who underwent 1 or more I&D procedures of upper extremity abscesses were included in the study. Patient demographic data, comorbidities, laboratory values, wound and blood culture results, number of I&D procedures performed, length of stay, and readmission rates were evaluated.

Results: Increasing age and white blood count were associated with an increased number of I&Ds performed. Obtaining blood cultures, whether positive or negative, was associated with increased length of stay. There was no association between obtaining blood cultures and number of procedures performed on multivariable analysis. Positive blood cultures were associated with increased readmission rates.

Conclusions: Routinely obtaining blood cultures in patients with upper extremity abscesses may not be beneficial. Obtaining blood cultures is not associated with an increased number of I&D procedures or readmission rates. Furthermore, obtaining blood cultures, regardless of positivity, is associated with increased lengths of hospital stay.

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disease that results in long-term hyperglycemia. Among the many long-term complications associated with diabetes, manifestations in the hand include Dupuytren's contracture, trigger finger, compressive neuropathies, and infections. These conditions can have a profound impact on a patient's quality of life, highlighting the importance of timely recognition and treatment of these manifestations. This review aims to provide updated information regarding the incidence and outcomes of these clinical manifestations in the diabetic versus nondiabetic population. A systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was performed. The literature search included the use of PubMed and Ovid databases to find relevant articles that were then selected based on an inclusion criterion that required level 4 evidence. Diabetes mellitus results in an increased incidence of Dupuytren's contracture, trigger finger, carpal tunnel syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome, and hand infections. Dupuytren's, trigger finger, and carpal tunnel syndrome all had similar outcomes, while diabetic patients had worse outcomes related to infections. There was a lack of data regarding the effect of diabetes on cubital tunnel syndrome. Future studies should be performed to analyze the effects of diabetes mellitus on hand manifestations, particularly regarding the outcomes of diabetic patients with cubital tunnel syndrome.

Background: The objective of this study was to understand the frequency and types of complications, and the associated postoperative outcomes within the first 5 years of practice after hand and upper extremity surgery fellowship.

Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of all patients seen and surgically treated by a single surgeon at a single institution from August 2014 to September 2019. This corresponded to the first 5 years of practice after fellowship. Data collected included patient demographics, perioperative data, complication type, and outcome of the complication (better/same/worse than preoperative status). Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system and a unique, self-derived system.

Results: In total, 3301 surgeries were performed during the first 5 years of practice. The overall complication rate was 7.9% (261 complications from 239 patients). The 30-day complication rate was 5.2% (171/3301). Eleven (4.2%) of the 261 complications occurred intraoperatively. The total number of complications significantly declined during the first 5 years of practice as follows: 74, 71, 46, 37, and 33 (P = .010, R² = .92). Hand and wrist were the most frequent anatomic locations involved and bone pathology was the predominant indication.

Conclusion: The overall surgical complication rate for hand and upper extremity surgery was 7.9%, with a 30-day complication rate of 5.2% (171/3301). The rate of complications after fellowship declined over the first 5 years of independent practice. Superficial infections were the most common complication. More than 90% of patients ultimately improved after addressing the complication.

Level of evidence: IV.

Background: Preoperative anemia has been shown to be associated with complications after numerous orthopedic procedures. No studies to our knowledge have examined its impact on outcomes after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fracture (DRF). We hypothesized that patients with preoperative anemia would have increased likelihood of adverse outcomes, and likelihood would increase with severity of anemia.

Methods: A total of 14 136 patients underwent ORIF for DRF over 2012-2021, identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were classified by World Health Organization criteria as nonanemic (hematocrit >36% for women, >39% for men), mildly anemic (hematocrit 33%-36% for women, 33%-39% for men), or moderately to severely anemic (hematocrit <33% for women or men). Multivariable regressions adjusted for age, sex, race, and comorbidities statistically different between anemic and nonanemic patients were used to examine the effect of anemia on postoperative outcomes.

Results: Mildly anemic patients had significantly longer length of stay and were significantly more likely to experience readmission and sepsis (P < .05 all). Moderately to severely anemic patients had significantly longer length of stay and were significantly more likely to experience readmission, postoperative transfusion, septic shock, and any adverse event (P < .05 all).

Conclusions: Preoperative anemia is associated with increased likelihood of adverse outcomes after ORIF for DRF, and likelihood increases with severity of anemia. Surgeons should monitor patients for preoperative anemia and endeavor to identify the source of and, if safe and possible, correct the anemia preoperatively or manage and educate patients postoperatively.

Background: As racial/ethnic disparities in management of distal radius fractures (DRFs) have not been well elucidated in the literature, this study sought to evaluate the correlation of race/ethnicity on surgical versus nonsurgical management of DRFs in a Medicare population.

Methods: The PearlDiver Standard Analytical Files Medicare claims database was used to identify patients ≥65 years old with isolated DRF. Patients with polytrauma or surgery performed for upper extremity neoplasm were excluded. Surgical versus nonsurgical management was compared based on demographics, comorbidity (Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, ECI), race/ethnicity, and whether the fracture was open or closed. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to assess for independent predictors.

Results: Of 54 564 isolated DRFs identified, surgery was performed for 20 663 (37.9%). On multivariable analysis, patients were independently less likely to receive surgical management if they were: older (relative to 65- to 69-year-olds, incrementally decreasing by age bracket up to >85 years where odds ratio [OR] was 0.27, P < .001), higher ECI (per 2 increase OR: 0.96, P < .001), and closed fractures (OR: 0.35, P < .001). For race/ethnicity: black (OR: 0.64, P < .001), Hispanic (OR: 0.71, P < .001), and Asian (OR: 0.60, P < .001) patients were less likely to undergo surgery.

Conclusions: While age, comorbidities, and fracture type are known to affect surgical decision-making for DRF, race/ethnicity has not previously been reported, and its independent prediction of nonsurgical management for several groups points to a disparity in surgical decision-making/access to care. This highlights the need for increased attention to initiatives that seek to provide equitable care to all patients.

Level of evidence: Level III-Retrospective review of national database.

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to diagnose and assess the extent of partial distal biceps injuries. The aim of this study was to report on the accuracy of MRI and the effect of injury history and study timing on its performance.

Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent surgical treatment of partial thickness distal biceps tears at a single center by multiple surgeons was performed. Inclusion criteria consisted of the performance of a preoperative MRI and documentation of the intraoperatively visualized extent of the tear, and 68 patients met the criteria for inclusion. A chart review was completed to evaluate the symptom duration, injury history, and tear extent.

Results: All patients had distal biceps tears of greater than 50% intraoperatively. However, MRI did not indicate any tearing in 20 (29%) patients, and its sensitivity for high-grade tear was 44%. Magnetic resonance imaging was significantly less likely to be read as high-grade tears in patients with insidious onset of their symptoms in comparison with patients who reported a traumatic onset (27% vs 55%, P = .024). However, the time from symptom onset to MRI did not significantly correlate with diagnosis of a high-grade tear on MRI (r = -0.15, P = .21).

Conclusions: These results indicate that MRI can underreport partial distal biceps tear extent, and this more commonly occurs in patients with insidious onset of pain.