Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90108-6.00015-6
Colin Chalk
Radial neuropathy is the third most common upper limb mononeuropathy after median and ulnar neuropathies. Muscle weakness, particularly wrist drop, is the main clinical feature of most cases of radial neuropathy, and an understanding of the radial nerve's anatomy generally makes localizing the lesion straightforward. Electrodiagnosis can help confirm a diagnosis of radial neuropathy and may help with more precise localization of the lesion. Nerve imaging with ultrasound or magnetic resonance neurography is increasingly used in diagnosis and is important in patients lacking a history of major arm or shoulder trauma. Radial neuropathy most often occurs in the setting of trauma, although many other uncommon causes have been described. With traumatic lesions, the prognosis for recovery is generally good, and for patients with persistent deficits, rehabilitation and surgical techniques may allow substantial functional improvement.
{"title":"Radial neuropathy.","authors":"Colin Chalk","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-323-90108-6.00015-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/B978-0-323-90108-6.00015-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radial neuropathy is the third most common upper limb mononeuropathy after median and ulnar neuropathies. Muscle weakness, particularly wrist drop, is the main clinical feature of most cases of radial neuropathy, and an understanding of the radial nerve's anatomy generally makes localizing the lesion straightforward. Electrodiagnosis can help confirm a diagnosis of radial neuropathy and may help with more precise localization of the lesion. Nerve imaging with ultrasound or magnetic resonance neurography is increasingly used in diagnosis and is important in patients lacking a history of major arm or shoulder trauma. Radial neuropathy most often occurs in the setting of trauma, although many other uncommon causes have been described. With traumatic lesions, the prognosis for recovery is generally good, and for patients with persistent deficits, rehabilitation and surgical techniques may allow substantial functional improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140856066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90820-7.00006-9
Mamatha Pasnoor, Gil I Wolfe, Richard J Barohn
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare neuromuscular junction disorder that is characterized by fatigable weakness of muscles. People with MG experience various clinical manifestations based on the muscles involved. MG can be autoimmune, paraneoplastic, congenital, medication-related, or transient in the neonatal period due to the passive placental transfer of antibodies from mothers with MG. Acetylcholine receptor antibodies are seen in the majority of patients with MG. However, other antibodies have been discovered in the last 20 years, including muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) and lipoprotein-related peptide 4 (LRP4), and are now available through commercial testing. More recently, a handful of other antibodies have been associated with MG; however, they are not presently available for routine testing. A disease classification system has been developed by the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) and is commonly used worldwide. A number of objective and subjective outcome measures have been developed and validated over the years and have been proven useful for both clinical and research purposes, serving as primary and secondary outcome measures in most clinical trials. A growing number of therapies are available for both acute and chronic management of MG, with several new mechanistic approaches under investigation. An international consensus guidance for the management of MG was first published in 2016 and updated in 2020.
{"title":"Myasthenia gravis.","authors":"Mamatha Pasnoor, Gil I Wolfe, Richard J Barohn","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-323-90820-7.00006-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90820-7.00006-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare neuromuscular junction disorder that is characterized by fatigable weakness of muscles. People with MG experience various clinical manifestations based on the muscles involved. MG can be autoimmune, paraneoplastic, congenital, medication-related, or transient in the neonatal period due to the passive placental transfer of antibodies from mothers with MG. Acetylcholine receptor antibodies are seen in the majority of patients with MG. However, other antibodies have been discovered in the last 20 years, including muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) and lipoprotein-related peptide 4 (LRP4), and are now available through commercial testing. More recently, a handful of other antibodies have been associated with MG; however, they are not presently available for routine testing. A disease classification system has been developed by the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) and is commonly used worldwide. A number of objective and subjective outcome measures have been developed and validated over the years and have been proven useful for both clinical and research purposes, serving as primary and secondary outcome measures in most clinical trials. A growing number of therapies are available for both acute and chronic management of MG, with several new mechanistic approaches under investigation. An international consensus guidance for the management of MG was first published in 2016 and updated in 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90820-7.00005-7
Sophie N M Binks, Sarosh R Irani
The autoimmune channelopathies represent a rapidly evolving scientific and clinical domain. The description of channels, expressed on neurons and glia, as targets of autoantibodies in neuromyelitis optica, autoimmune encephalitis, and related syndromes have revolutionized many areas of neurologic practice. To date, tens of surface antibody specificities have been described, a number that is likely to continue to increase. A central paradigm for all these disorders is that of pathogenic autoantibodies which target extracellular epitopes accessible for binding in vivo. Hence, in these disorders, the autoantibodies are causative diagnostic tools, and provide valuable reagents to model the diseases. Their production by B-lineage cells provides opportunities to study and modulate their production. Across these syndromes, early recognition and treatment are critical since most respond to immunotherapies. Yet, several unmet medical needs persist within treated patient populations, and widespread clinical under-recognition remains a challenge. In this review, we summarize the neuroscience and immunologic basis of autoantibody-mediated central nervous system channelopathies, the molecular effects of the autoantibodies, clinical phenotypes, and treatment approaches. We describe progress since the inauguration of the field through to open questions and potential future directions.
{"title":"Autoantibody-mediated central nervous system channelopathies.","authors":"Sophie N M Binks, Sarosh R Irani","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-323-90820-7.00005-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90820-7.00005-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The autoimmune channelopathies represent a rapidly evolving scientific and clinical domain. The description of channels, expressed on neurons and glia, as targets of autoantibodies in neuromyelitis optica, autoimmune encephalitis, and related syndromes have revolutionized many areas of neurologic practice. To date, tens of surface antibody specificities have been described, a number that is likely to continue to increase. A central paradigm for all these disorders is that of pathogenic autoantibodies which target extracellular epitopes accessible for binding in vivo. Hence, in these disorders, the autoantibodies are causative diagnostic tools, and provide valuable reagents to model the diseases. Their production by B-lineage cells provides opportunities to study and modulate their production. Across these syndromes, early recognition and treatment are critical since most respond to immunotherapies. Yet, several unmet medical needs persist within treated patient populations, and widespread clinical under-recognition remains a challenge. In this review, we summarize the neuroscience and immunologic basis of autoantibody-mediated central nervous system channelopathies, the molecular effects of the autoantibodies, clinical phenotypes, and treatment approaches. We describe progress since the inauguration of the field through to open questions and potential future directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-99209-1.00022-3
Marc Engelen, Stephan Kemp, Florian Eichler
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) is a peroxisomal disorder caused by mutations in the ABCD1 gene and characterized by impaired very long-chain fatty acid beta-oxidation. Clinically, male patients develop adrenal failure and progressive myelopathy in adulthood, although the age of onset and rate of progression are highly variable. In addition, 40% of male patients develop a leukodystrophy (cerebral ALD) before the age of 18 years. Women with ALD also develop myelopathy, but generally at a later age than men and with slower progression. Adrenal failure and leukodystrophy are exceedingly rare in women. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), or more recently autologous HCT with ex vivo lentivirally transfected bone marrow, halts the leukodystrophy. Unfortunately, there is no curative treatment for the myelopathy. In this chapter, clinical spectrum of ALD is discussed in detail.
{"title":"Adrenoleukodystrophy.","authors":"Marc Engelen, Stephan Kemp, Florian Eichler","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-323-99209-1.00022-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99209-1.00022-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) is a peroxisomal disorder caused by mutations in the ABCD1 gene and characterized by impaired very long-chain fatty acid beta-oxidation. Clinically, male patients develop adrenal failure and progressive myelopathy in adulthood, although the age of onset and rate of progression are highly variable. In addition, 40% of male patients develop a leukodystrophy (cerebral ALD) before the age of 18 years. Women with ALD also develop myelopathy, but generally at a later age than men and with slower progression. Adrenal failure and leukodystrophy are exceedingly rare in women. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), or more recently autologous HCT with ex vivo lentivirally transfected bone marrow, halts the leukodystrophy. Unfortunately, there is no curative treatment for the myelopathy. In this chapter, clinical spectrum of ALD is discussed in detail.</p>","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142345537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90120-8.00016-2
Edward P Esposito, Ian C Han, Thomas V Johnson
Leading causes of blindness worldwide include neurodegenerative diseases of the retina, which cause irreversible loss of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptors, and optic neuropathies, which result in retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death. Because photoreceptor and RGCs do not spontaneously regenerate in mammals, including humans, vision loss from these conditions is, at present, permanent. Recent advances in gene and cell-based therapies have provided new hope to patients affected by these conditions. This chapter reviews the current state and future of these approaches to treating ocular neurodegenerative disease. Gene therapies for retinal degeneration and optic neuropathies primarily focus on correcting known pathogenic mutations that cause inherited conditions to halt progression. There are multiple retinal and optic neuropathy gene therapies in clinical trials, and one retinal gene therapy is approved in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia. Cell-based therapies are mutation agnostic and have the potential to repopulate neurons regardless of the underlying etiology of degeneration. While photoreceptor cell replacement is nearing a human clinical trial, RPE transplantation is currently in phase I/II clinical trials. RGC replacement faces numerous logistical challenges, but preclinical research has laid the foundation for functional repair of optic neuropathies to be feasible.
{"title":"Gene and cell-based therapies for retinal and optic nerve disease.","authors":"Edward P Esposito, Ian C Han, Thomas V Johnson","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-323-90120-8.00016-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90120-8.00016-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leading causes of blindness worldwide include neurodegenerative diseases of the retina, which cause irreversible loss of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptors, and optic neuropathies, which result in retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death. Because photoreceptor and RGCs do not spontaneously regenerate in mammals, including humans, vision loss from these conditions is, at present, permanent. Recent advances in gene and cell-based therapies have provided new hope to patients affected by these conditions. This chapter reviews the current state and future of these approaches to treating ocular neurodegenerative disease. Gene therapies for retinal degeneration and optic neuropathies primarily focus on correcting known pathogenic mutations that cause inherited conditions to halt progression. There are multiple retinal and optic neuropathy gene therapies in clinical trials, and one retinal gene therapy is approved in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia. Cell-based therapies are mutation agnostic and have the potential to repopulate neurons regardless of the underlying etiology of degeneration. While photoreceptor cell replacement is nearing a human clinical trial, RPE transplantation is currently in phase I/II clinical trials. RGC replacement faces numerous logistical challenges, but preclinical research has laid the foundation for functional repair of optic neuropathies to be feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142345472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-99209-1.00007-7
Xavier Ayrignac
Inherited white matter disorders include a wide range of disorders of various origins with distinct genetic, pathophysiologic, and metabolic backgrounds. Although most of these diseases have nonspecific clinical and radiologic features, some display distinct clinical and/or imaging (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI) characteristics that might suggest the causative gene. Recent advances in genetic testing allow assessing gene panels that include several hundred genes; however, an MRI-based diagnostic approach is important to narrow the choice of candidate genes, particularly in countries where these techniques are not available. Indeed, white matter disorders with prominent posterior fossa involvement present specific MRI (and clinical) phenotypes that can directly orient the diagnosis. This chapter describes the main genetic disorders with posterior fossa involvement and discusses diagnostic strategies.
{"title":"Disorders with prominent posterior fossa involvement.","authors":"Xavier Ayrignac","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-323-99209-1.00007-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99209-1.00007-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inherited white matter disorders include a wide range of disorders of various origins with distinct genetic, pathophysiologic, and metabolic backgrounds. Although most of these diseases have nonspecific clinical and radiologic features, some display distinct clinical and/or imaging (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI) characteristics that might suggest the causative gene. Recent advances in genetic testing allow assessing gene panels that include several hundred genes; however, an MRI-based diagnostic approach is important to narrow the choice of candidate genes, particularly in countries where these techniques are not available. Indeed, white matter disorders with prominent posterior fossa involvement present specific MRI (and clinical) phenotypes that can directly orient the diagnosis. This chapter describes the main genetic disorders with posterior fossa involvement and discusses diagnostic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142345543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-99209-1.00016-8
David Jakabek, Joga Chaganti, Bruce James Brew
Leukoencephalopathy from infectious agents may have a rapid course, such as human simplex virus encephalitis; however, in many diseases, it may take months or years before diagnosis, such as in subacute sclerosing panencephalitis or Whipple disease. There are wide geographic distributions and susceptible populations, including both immunocompetent and immunodeficient patients. Many infections have high mortality rates, such as John Cunningham virus and subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, although others have effective treatments if suspected and treated early, such as herpes simplex encephalitis. This chapter will describe viral, bacterial, and protozoal infections, which predominantly cause leukoencephalopathy. We focus on the clinical presentation of these infectious agents briefly covering epidemiology and subtypes of infections. Next, we detail current pathophysiologic mechanisms causing white matter injury. Diagnostic and confirmatory tests are discussed. We cover predominantly MRI imaging features of leukoencephalopathies, and in addition, summarize the common imaging features. Additionally, we detail how imaging features may be used to narrow the differential of a leukoencephalopathy clinical presentation. Lastly, we present an outline of common treatment approaches where available.
{"title":"Infectious leukoencephalopathies.","authors":"David Jakabek, Joga Chaganti, Bruce James Brew","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-323-99209-1.00016-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99209-1.00016-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leukoencephalopathy from infectious agents may have a rapid course, such as human simplex virus encephalitis; however, in many diseases, it may take months or years before diagnosis, such as in subacute sclerosing panencephalitis or Whipple disease. There are wide geographic distributions and susceptible populations, including both immunocompetent and immunodeficient patients. Many infections have high mortality rates, such as John Cunningham virus and subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, although others have effective treatments if suspected and treated early, such as herpes simplex encephalitis. This chapter will describe viral, bacterial, and protozoal infections, which predominantly cause leukoencephalopathy. We focus on the clinical presentation of these infectious agents briefly covering epidemiology and subtypes of infections. Next, we detail current pathophysiologic mechanisms causing white matter injury. Diagnostic and confirmatory tests are discussed. We cover predominantly MRI imaging features of leukoencephalopathies, and in addition, summarize the common imaging features. Additionally, we detail how imaging features may be used to narrow the differential of a leukoencephalopathy clinical presentation. Lastly, we present an outline of common treatment approaches where available.</p>","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142345548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90120-8.00001-0
Selene Ingusci, Bonnie L Hall, William F Goins, Justus B Cohen, Joseph C Glorioso
Brain diseases with a known or suspected genetic basis represent an important frontier for advanced therapeutics. The central nervous system (CNS) is an intricate network in which diverse cell types with multiple functions communicate via complex signaling pathways, making therapeutic intervention in brain-related diseases challenging. Nevertheless, as more information on the molecular genetics of brain-related diseases becomes available, genetic intervention using gene therapeutic strategies should become more feasible. There remain, however, several significant hurdles to overcome that relate to (i) the development of appropriate gene vectors and (ii) methods to achieve local or broad vector delivery. Clearly, gene delivery tools must be engineered for distribution to the correct cell type in a specific brain region and to accomplish therapeutic transgene expression at an appropriate level and duration. They also must avoid all toxicity, including the induction of inflammatory responses. Over the last 40 years, various types of viral vectors have been developed as tools to introduce therapeutic genes into the brain, primarily targeting neurons. This review describes the most prominent vector systems currently approaching clinical application for CNS disorders and highlights both remaining challenges as well as improvements in vector designs that achieve greater safety, defined tropism, and therapeutic gene expression.
{"title":"Viral vectors for gene delivery to the central nervous system.","authors":"Selene Ingusci, Bonnie L Hall, William F Goins, Justus B Cohen, Joseph C Glorioso","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-323-90120-8.00001-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90120-8.00001-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain diseases with a known or suspected genetic basis represent an important frontier for advanced therapeutics. The central nervous system (CNS) is an intricate network in which diverse cell types with multiple functions communicate via complex signaling pathways, making therapeutic intervention in brain-related diseases challenging. Nevertheless, as more information on the molecular genetics of brain-related diseases becomes available, genetic intervention using gene therapeutic strategies should become more feasible. There remain, however, several significant hurdles to overcome that relate to (i) the development of appropriate gene vectors and (ii) methods to achieve local or broad vector delivery. Clearly, gene delivery tools must be engineered for distribution to the correct cell type in a specific brain region and to accomplish therapeutic transgene expression at an appropriate level and duration. They also must avoid all toxicity, including the induction of inflammatory responses. Over the last 40 years, various types of viral vectors have been developed as tools to introduce therapeutic genes into the brain, primarily targeting neurons. This review describes the most prominent vector systems currently approaching clinical application for CNS disorders and highlights both remaining challenges as well as improvements in vector designs that achieve greater safety, defined tropism, and therapeutic gene expression.</p>","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142345482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90820-7.00013-6
David Beeson
The neuromuscular junction is a prototypic synapse that has been extensively studied and provides a model for smaller and less accessible central synapses. Central to transmission at the neuromuscular synapse is the muscle acetylcholine receptor cation channel. Studies of the genetic disorders affecting the neuromuscular junction, termed congenital myasthenic syndromes, have illustrated how impaired signal transmission may be caused by a variety of mutations both within the ion channel itself and by the context of the ion channel within the synapse. Thus, multiple pathogenic mutations are also identified in proteins affecting the clustering, location, and density of the receptor within the overall synaptic structure. Disease severity ranges from death in childhood to mild disability throughout life. In addition, in utero, fetal akinesia due to impaired neuromuscular transmission may cause developmental abnormalities. Early studies identified mutations in the genes encoding the acetylcholine receptor subunits that impair ion channel gating or reduce the number of endplate receptors or a combination of the two, giving rise to "slow channel," "fast channel," or deficiency syndromes. Subsequently, it became clear that myasthenic syndromes also stem from mutations in proteins involved in neurotransmitter release, the formation and maintenance of the neuromuscular synapse, or glycosylation. This chapter describes the patient phenotypes, the diverse range of molecular mechanisms for synaptic dysfunction, and the corresponding therapeutic strategies, including drug combinations, that can be tailored to the many subtypes.
{"title":"Congenital myasthenic syndromes.","authors":"David Beeson","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-323-90820-7.00013-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90820-7.00013-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The neuromuscular junction is a prototypic synapse that has been extensively studied and provides a model for smaller and less accessible central synapses. Central to transmission at the neuromuscular synapse is the muscle acetylcholine receptor cation channel. Studies of the genetic disorders affecting the neuromuscular junction, termed congenital myasthenic syndromes, have illustrated how impaired signal transmission may be caused by a variety of mutations both within the ion channel itself and by the context of the ion channel within the synapse. Thus, multiple pathogenic mutations are also identified in proteins affecting the clustering, location, and density of the receptor within the overall synaptic structure. Disease severity ranges from death in childhood to mild disability throughout life. In addition, in utero, fetal akinesia due to impaired neuromuscular transmission may cause developmental abnormalities. Early studies identified mutations in the genes encoding the acetylcholine receptor subunits that impair ion channel gating or reduce the number of endplate receptors or a combination of the two, giving rise to \"slow channel,\" \"fast channel,\" or deficiency syndromes. Subsequently, it became clear that myasthenic syndromes also stem from mutations in proteins involved in neurotransmitter release, the formation and maintenance of the neuromuscular synapse, or glycosylation. This chapter describes the patient phenotypes, the diverse range of molecular mechanisms for synaptic dysfunction, and the corresponding therapeutic strategies, including drug combinations, that can be tailored to the many subtypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90820-7.09999-7
Michael J Aminoff, François Boller, Dick F Swaab
{"title":"Foreword.","authors":"Michael J Aminoff, François Boller, Dick F Swaab","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-323-90820-7.09999-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90820-7.09999-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}