Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program最新文献

Ischemic priapism is a common but underrecognized morbidity affecting about 33% of adult men with sickle cell disease (SCD). The onset of priapism occurs in the prepubertal period and tends to be recurrent with increasing age. Significantly, priapism is associated with an unrecognized high burden of mental duress and sexual dysfunctions. The diagnosis of priapism is clinical. Many episodes of priapism will resolve spontaneously, but when an episode lasts longer than 4 hours, the episode is considered a urologic emergency requiring quick intervention with either corporal aspiration or shunt surgery. Only 3 randomized clinical trials (stilbesterol, ephedrine or etilefrine, and sildenafil) have been conducted for secondary priapism prevention in SCD. All 3 trials were limited with small sample sizes, selection biases, and inconclusive results after completion. The current molecular understanding of the pathobiology of priapism suggests a relative nitric oxide (NO) deficiency secondary to chronic hemolysis in SCD and associated phosphodiesterase type 5 dysregulation. We posit an increase in NO levels will restore the normal homeostatic relationship between voluntary erection and detumescence. Currently, 2 randomized phase 2 trials (1 double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and 1 open-label, single-arm intervention) are being conducted for secondary priapism prevention in men at high risk for recurrent priapism (NCT03938454 and NCT05142254). We review the epidemiology and pathobiology of priapism, along with mechanistic therapeutic approaches for secondary prevention of priapism in SCD.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) often represents the only curative treatment for various malignant and nonmalignant disorders. Initially, the only suitable donors were considered human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched or partially matched relatives. The founding of international unrelated donor and umbilical cord blood registries expanded unrelated donor options and access for patients. In the absence of a matched sibling donor (MSD) with 13% to 51% availability, the current consensus recommends use of a matched unrelated donor (MUD) at HLA-A, B, C, and DRB1 with consideration of matching at HLA-DPB1 and -DQB1. MUD donor availability (donor willing and available to donate) ranges from 29% to 78% with African American patients on the lower end and white non-Hispanic patients with the highest likelihood of a match. Recent studies comparing donor to no-donor treatment options in malignant disease consistently point to substantially better outcomes following alloHCT. In the absence of an MSD or MUD, alternative donor choices turn to haploidentical related (Haplo), mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD), and umbilical cord blood (UCB). Novel strategies for alloHCT, including the use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based graft vs host disease prophylaxis, have expanded the safety and effectiveness of transplant procedures across HLA barriers using Haplo and MMUD. The less restrictive matching requirements for UCB transplant are well documented and allow for transplant across multiply mismatched HLA alleles. When all donor options are considered, nearly all patients have an available donor. Here we discuss the likelihood of donor availability, complete HLA match by available donor type, and current controversies warranting future research.

Von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common inherited bleeding disorder (IBD), disproportionately affects females, given the hemostatic challenges they may encounter throughout their lifetimes. Despite this, research about VWD remains grossly underrepresented, particularly compared to hemophilia, which is historically diagnosed in males. Structural sexism, stigmatization of menstrual bleeding, delayed diagnosis, and a lack of timely access to care result in an increased frequency of bleeding events, iron deficiency, iron deficiency anemia, and a decreased quality of life. However, we are only beginning to recognize and acknowledge the magnitude of the burden of this disease. With an increasing number of studies documenting the experiences of women with IBDs and recent international guidelines suggesting changes to optimal management, a paradigm shift in recognition and treatment is taking place. Here, we present a fictional patient case to illustrate one woman's history of bleeding. We review the evidence describing the impact of VWD on quality of life, normalization of vaginal bleeding, diagnostic delays, and the importance of access to multidisciplinary care. Furthermore, we discuss considerations around reproductive decision-making and the intergenerational nature of bleeding, which often renders patients as caregivers. Through incorporating the patient perspective, we argue for an equitable and compassionate path to overcome decades of silence, misrecognition, and dismissal. This path moves toward destigmatization, open dialogue, and timely access to specialized care.

Pregnancy in women with sickle cell disease (SCD) is fraught with complications, some of which are life-threatening. Managing pregnancy in these women can be challenging, especially with poor resources, which is often the case in low-income countries. In Nigeria, for instance, up to 90% of patients pay out of pocket for medical care due to the poorly developed health insurance system, and this worsens the morbidity and mortality associated with this condition. We describe a pragmatic approach to routinely managing pregnant women with SCD in the antenatal period, showing the feasibility of effective management of these high-risk pregnancies in limited-resource settings. We also present the case of a pregnant Nigerian woman with SCD who has intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and acute chest syndrome (ACS), conditions that are life-threatening for the fetus and the mother, respectively, and require prompt intervention. We highlight how we successfully managed this woman in a cost-effective manner by employing relatively inexpensive tests for diagnosis and treating her effectively with oxygen, appropriate antibiotics and manual exchange blood transfusion for the ACS, and finger pulse oximeters to monitor oxygen saturation. We explore pathophysiological concepts to IUGR in women with SCD and briefly discuss the appropriate mode of delivery, including the options for pain relief in labor.

Growing recognition that the ovary is an end organ in sickle cell disease (SCD), advances in SCD treatment and cure, and innovations in assisted reproductive technologies invite progressive challenges in fertility care for women with SCD. The reproductive life span of women with SCD may be reduced because ovarian reserve declines more rapidly in people with SCD compared to unaffected people. Some young women have diminished ovarian reserve, a risk factor for infertility. Referrals for fertility preservation may be offered and anticipatory guidance about when to seek infertility care provided. For a subset of people with SCD, this information is also applicable when pursuing in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing to avoid implantation of an embryo with SCD. Here we explore the dimensions of SCD-related fertility care illustrated by the case of a 28-year-old woman with hemoglobin SS disease who initially presented for a hematology consultation for preconception counseling. This case highlights the complexity of preconception SCD management and care and the need to partner with patients to help align pregnancy hopes with SCD treatment and the many associated uncertainties.

Curative therapies for sickle cell disease include allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and gene-modified autologous stem cell transplantation. HSCT has been used for 30 years with success measured by engraftment, symptom control, graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) risk, organ toxicity, and immune reconstitution. While human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling donor (MSD) transplants have excellent outcomes, alternate donor transplants (unrelated/haploidentical) are just beginning to overcome GVHD and engraftment hurdles to match MSD. Gene therapy, a newly developed treatment, is undergoing careful evaluation in many trials with varying approaches. The risk/benefit ratio to the patient in relation to outcomes, toxicities, and mortality risk drives eligibility for curative interventions. Consequently, eligibility criteria for MSD transplants can be less stringent, especially in the young. Posttransplant outcome analysis after the "cure" with respect to organ function recovery is essential. While established damage such as stroke is irreversible, transplant can help stabilize (pulmonary function), prevent further deterioration (stroke), improve (neurocognition), and protect unaffected organs. Tracking organ functions postintervention uniformly between clinical trials and for adequate duration is essential to answer safety and efficacy questions related to curative therapies. Age-appropriate application/outcome analyses of such therapies will be the ultimate goal in overcoming this disease.

The outcome for adolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has improved, mostly based on the use of pediatric-inspired intensive protocols. Due to increasing disease resistance and treatment-related toxicity with age, further improvements are now expected from the expanding knowledge of ALL biology, more accurate risk stratification, and the early introduction of targeted small molecules and immunotherapy. In the last decade, the rate of AYA with B-cell precursor ALL with undetermined genetic drivers ("B-other") has shrunk from 40% to fewer than 10%. The high-risk subgroup of Philadelphia-like ALL is the most frequent entity diagnosed in this age range, offering a multitude of potentially actionable targets. The timely and accurate identification of these targets remains challenging, however. Early minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring has become a standard of care for the risk stratification and identification of patients likely to benefit from an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Recently approved immunotherapies are moving frontline to eradicate MRD, to improve the outcome of high-risk patients, and, eventually, to reduce treatment burden. Comprehensive care programs dedicated to AYA with cancer aim at improving inclusion in specific clinical trials and at giving access to appropriate psychosocial support, fertility preservation, and survivorship programs.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a heterogeneous disease, both clinically and biologically. The biological behavior and development of FL is a culmination of complex multistep processes underpinned by genetic and nongenetic determinants. Epigenetic deregulation through recurrent genetic alterations is now a recognized major biological hallmark of FL, alongside the t(14;18) translocation. In parallel, there is a strong interplay between the lymphoma B cells and the immune microenvironment, with the microenvironment serving as a critical enabler by creating a tumor-supportive niche and modulating the immune response to favor survival of the malignant B cells. A further layer of complexity arises from the biological heterogeneity that occurs between patients and within an individual, both over the course of the disease and at different sites of disease involvement. Altogether, taking the first steps to bridge the understanding of these various biological components and how to evaluate these clinically may aid and inform future strategies, including logical therapeutic interventions, risk stratification, therapy selection, and disease monitoring.

TP53 mutations impair the cellular response to genotoxic stress and drive intrinsic resistance to conventional cytotoxic therapies. Clinical outcomes in patients with TP53-mutated myeloid malignancies are poor and marked by high-risk clinical features, such as complex karyotype and prior exposure to leukemogenic therapies, and short survival due to a high risk of relapse after allogeneic transplantation. TP53 mutations are thus included as adverse markers in clinical prognostic models, including European LeukemiaNet recommendations and the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Recent data indicate that the TP53 allelic state, co-occurring somatic mutations, and the position of the TP53 mutation within the clonal hierarchy define genetic heterogeneity among TP53-mutated MDS and acute myeloid leukemia that may influence clinical outcomes, thereby informing the selection of patients most suitable for transplantation. Further, novel therapeutic methods such as antibody-based agents (monoclonals or dual-affinity retargeting antibodies), cellular therapies (natural killer cells, chimeric antigen receptor T cells), or targeted agents (eprenetapopt) may offer opportunities to modify the approach to pretransplant conditioning or posttransplant maintenance and improve clinical outcomes.

Chronic phase CML (CP-CML) patients who are resistant to 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have limited therapeutic options and are at significant risk for progression to the blast phase. Ponatinib has been the drug of choice in this setting for the past decade, but when given at full dose (45 mg/d), the risk of serious vascular occlusive events is substantial. Lower doses mitigate this risk but also reduce the efficacy. Emerging data suggest that a high dose of ponatinib is important to achieve response, but a lower dose is usually sufficient to maintain response, introducing a safer therapeutic pathway for many patients. The recent development and approval of the novel allosteric ABL1 inhibitor, asciminib, for CP-CML patients with resistant disease provides another potentially safe and effective option in this setting. These recent therapeutic advances mean that for most resistant CP-CML patients who have failed 2 or more TKIs, 2 excellent options are available for consideration-dose modified ponatinib and asciminib. Patients harboring the T315I mutation are also candidates for either ponatinib or asciminib, but in this setting, higher doses are critical to success. Lacking randomized comparisons of ponatinib and asciminib, the best choice for each clinical circumstance is often difficult to determine. Here we review emerging evidence from recent trials and make some tentative suggestions about which drug is preferable and at what dose in different clinical settings using case studies to illustrate the key issues to consider.