Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program最新文献

Hormonal contraceptive therapy (estrogens and/or progestogens) includes different formulations associated with varying venous thromboembolism (VTE) risks. The thrombogenicity of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) is due at least in part to multiple changes in clotting factors and the vasculature and is dependent on both estrogen dose and type of progestin. Transdermal patch and vaginal ring users have similar or higher VTE risk as combined oral contraceptive users. Progestin-only agents have varying VTE risk. While depot medroxyprogesterone acetate appears to increase VTE risk, the levonorgestrel-based intrauterine system and low-dose progestin-only pills have no additional VTE risk. There are less data for the subdermal progestin-only implant. This article reviews contraceptive-related VTE risk by agent and by clinical scenario, including in patients with inherited thrombophilia, systemic lupus erythematosus with or without antiphospholipid antibodies or antiphospholipid syndrome, and sickle cell disease. Relevant clinical practice guidelines are reviewed. A multidisciplinary approach to counseling is needed for patient-focused decision-making.

The acute hepatic porphyrias (AHPs) are a family of rare genetic diseases associated with attacks of abdominal pain, vomiting, weakness, neuropathy, and other neurovisceral symptoms. Pathogenic variants in 1 of 4 enzymes of heme synthesis are necessary for the development of AHP, and the onset of acute attacks also requires the induction of δ-aminolevulinic acid synthase 1 (ALAS1), the first and rate-limiting step of heme synthesis in the liver. Givosiran is an RNA interference medication that inhibits hepatic ALAS1 and was designed to treat AHP. In 2019 the US Food and Drug Administration approved givosiran for AHP based on positive results from a phase 3 clinical trial of 94 patients with AHP who demonstrated a marked improvement in AHP attacks and a substantial decrease in δ-aminolevulinic acid and porphobilinogen, the primary disease markers of AHP. A long-term follow-up study demonstrated continued improvement in AHP attack rates, biochemical measures of disease, and quality of life. Real-world studies have also confirmed these results. Common side effects include injection site reactions, hyperhomocysteinemia, and abnormalities of liver and renal biochemistries. This article reviews the studies that led to givosiran approval, discusses real-world clinical data, and highlights remaining questions in the treatment of AHP.

In contrast to B-cell lymphoma, the advent of modern targeting drugs and immunotherapeutics has not led to major breakthroughs in the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) to date. Therefore, both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) continue to play a central role in the management of PTCL. Focusing on the most common entities (PTCL not otherwise specified, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, and ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma), we summarize evidence, indications, and points to consider for transplant strategies in PTCL by treatment line. Although cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are biologically and clinically distinct from the aforementioned PTCL, both disease groups appear to be susceptible to the graft-versus-lymphoma effects conferred by allogeneic HCT (alloHCT), setting the stage for alloHCT as a potentially curative treatment in otherwise incurable CTCL, such as mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome. Nevertheless, specific aspects regarding indication and prerequisites for alloHCT in CTCL need to be considered. Given the inherent toxicity of alloHCT and the significant risk of relapse after transplant, only intelligent strategies embedding alloHCT in current PTCL/CTCL treatment algorithms in terms of patient selection, timing, pretransplant preparation, and posttransplant maintenance provide optimal results. New targeted and cellular therapies, either complementary or competitive to HCT, are eagerly awaited in order to improve PTCL/CTCL outcomes.

The porphyrias are a group of disorders of heme biosynthesis, each characterized by an enzymatic defect in the heme biosynthetic pathway. Porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT) arises due to the inhibition of uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase (UROD) in the presence of hepatic iron and oxidative stress. Most patients with PCT have evidence of siderosis on liver biopsy, and the disease resolves with iron depletion. PCT manifests as skin fragility, blistering cutaneous lesions on sun-exposed areas, dark urine, and elevated plasma and urine porphyrins. Factors contributing to the development of PCT include alcohol use, hepatitis C virus infection, human immunodeficiency virus, estrogen use, UROD pathogenic variants, and hereditary hemochromatosis. Treatment includes therapeutic phlebotomy to decrease total body iron levels and low-dose hydroxychloroquine, which reduces hepatic porphyrin content. The following review explores the biology of PCT, the critical role of iron in disease pathogenesis, and our approach to the management of these patients.

TP53 is mutated in 10 to 15% of cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and is associated with a previous exposure to cytotoxic therapy, complex cytogenetic abnormalities, and a poor prognosis. Recent data have established the importance of TP53-mutant allele status, the determination of which requires specific genetic testing. Compared with monoallelic disease, multihit TP53-mutant AML/MDS is associated with chromosomal abnormalities and decreased overall survival. Most TP53 mutations are missense mutations that localize to the DNA binding domain. Hot-spot mutations involving residues R175, Y220, G245, R248, R273, or R282 represent approximately 35% of all TP53 missense mutations in AML/MDS. There is evidence that these hot-spot mutations may have dominant negative or gain-of-function properties. Here we review this evidence and discuss its potential impact on patient outcomes and clinical management.

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common symptom in adolescence, often leading to significant disruptions in daily life, such as school absences, shame caused by the stigma surrounding menstruation, and symptoms from iron deficiency. Further, HMB may be the first and/or only sign of an underlying bleeding disorder. Navigating the symptoms, effects, and treatments of HMB during adolescence requires a collaborative approach between the patient, caregivers, and healthcare providers. This work can be effectively and efficiently conducted in interdisciplinary clinics, where patients see hematology, gynecology, and adolescent providers. In these settings, healthcare providers exchange knowledge and expertise, after which they can reach a consensus for diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic intervention. Development and implementation of an interdisciplinary hematology and gynecology clinic can be challenging; however, the crucial rationale is that established clinics improve patient outcomes. Using an example interdisciplinary adolescent clinic, we outline the critical components needed to execute a successful clinic for adolescents with HMB and share key takeaways.

The treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been transformed over the past decade based on a better understanding of disease biology, especially regarding molecular genetic drivers and relevant signaling pathways. Agents focusing on B-cell receptor (in particular Bruton tyrosine kinase [BTK]) and apoptosis (BCL2) targets have replaced chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) as the treatment standard. BTK and BCL2 inhibitor-based therapy has consistently shown prolonged progression-free survival and in some instances even increased overall survival against CIT in frontline phase 3 trials. This improvement is particularly pronounced in high-risk CLL subgroups defined by unmutated IGHV, deletion 17p (17p-), and/or the mutation of TP53, making CIT in these subgroups essentially obsolete. Despite remarkable advances, these markers also retain a differential prognostic and predictive impact in the context of targeted therapies, mandating risk-stratification in frontline management. Furthermore, BTK- and BCL2-targeting agents differ in their adverse event profiles, requiring adjustment of treatment choice based on patient characteristics such as coexisting conditions, comedications, and delivery-of-care aspects.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a prevalent and serious complication among cancer patients, necessitating therapeutic anticoagulation for many individuals with brain metastases. Simultaneously, patients with brain metastases, particularly those with high-risk primary tumors, have an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Managing anticoagulation in these patients presents a dual challenge: preventing thromboembolism while avoiding hemorrhagic events. Here, we present our approach to anticoagulation for acute VTE in patients with brain metastases, based on the available evidence. We review potential risk factors for anticoagulation-associated ICH in this population and discuss strategies for managing acute VTE in patients with and without ICH.

The role of the hematologist in the management of vascular anomalies is evolving. Several vascular tumors and malformations are associated with complex coagulation derangements. Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma or tufted angiomas may present with a consumptive coagulopathy known as the Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon (KMP). The management of KMP is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality from this condition. Slow-flow vascular malformations (SFVM) are also frequently complicated by a coagulopathy requiring anticoagulation, especially during and after surgical procedures, and some of these conditions pose a high risk of venous thromboembolism. Pain in SFVM is also frequently responsive to anticoagulation as well. It is essential for a hematologist with expertise in vascular anomalies to assist in the management of these complex conditions as part of a multidisciplinary team to reduce morbidity and mortality. Through case-based discussions, we attempt to highlight the critical role of the hematologist in managing these anomalies.

High-dose melphalan supported by autologous transplantation has been the standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma for nearly 30 years. Several randomized clinical trials have reaffirmed the strong position of transplant in the era of triplets combining proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and dexamethasone. Although quadruplets are becoming the standard in transplantation programs, no data are currently available on the need for a transplant with new regimens incorporating anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. Outcomes remain heterogeneous, with different response depths and durations depending on the cytogenetics at diagnosis. The improvement of disease prognostication using sensitive and specific tools allows for adapting the strategy to initial and dynamic risks. This review examines which patients need a transplant, when transplantation is preferable, and why.