The MiT subfamily of transcription factors includes TFE3, TFEB, TFEC and MITF. Gene fusions involving two of these transcription factors have been well characterized in two subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC): TFE3-rearranged RCC (also known as Xp11 translocation RCC) and TFEB-rearranged RCC (which typically harbour a t(6;11)(p21;q12) translocation). TFE3 and TFEB have overlapping functional activity, which explains why these two subtypes of translocation RCC have many morphologic similarities and express similar downstream targets. Therefore, these two neoplasms are grouped together under the heading of ‘MiT family translocation RCC’. TFE3-rearranged PEComas and TFEB-amplified RCC are more recently described related neoplasms harbouring alterations in these same genes. This review summarizes our current knowledge of these molecularly defined neoplasms, and differential diagnostic considerations.
{"title":"MiT family translocation carcinomas of the kidney and related entities","authors":"Pedram Argani","doi":"10.1111/his.15560","DOIUrl":"10.1111/his.15560","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The MiT subfamily of transcription factors includes TFE3, TFEB, TFEC and MITF. Gene fusions involving two of these transcription factors have been well characterized in two subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC): <i>TFE3</i>-rearranged RCC (also known as Xp11 translocation RCC) and <i>TFEB</i>-rearranged RCC (which typically harbour a t(6;11)(p21;q12) translocation). TFE3 and TFEB have overlapping functional activity, which explains why these two subtypes of translocation RCC have many morphologic similarities and express similar downstream targets. Therefore, these two neoplasms are grouped together under the heading of ‘MiT family translocation RCC’. <i>TFE3</i>-rearranged PEComas and <i>TFEB</i>-amplified RCC are more recently described related neoplasms harbouring alterations in these same genes. This review summarizes our current knowledge of these molecularly defined neoplasms, and differential diagnostic considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13219,"journal":{"name":"Histopathology","volume":"88 1","pages":"193-213"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/his.15560","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145742320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Histopathology parameters are generally critical for the management of prostate cancer. Current practice is focussed on accuracy, precision, reproducibility, standardization and completeness of this data collection. This review discusses issues with this reporting practice and suggests a simpler alternative approach focussed on the clinical utility of pathology data and effective communication of the histopathology ‘message’. The principles of prostate cancer detection and management are significantly different from those of other cancers. These differences could have important implications for the histopathological diagnosis and reporting of prostate cancer. Management decisions are often based on pathology data from nontargeted prostate biopsies that are subject to significant sampling error, which precludes accurate determination of tumour size and grade. In contrast to other solid tumours, definitive tumour size, grade, and stage are available only in the minority of patients who have undergone complete tumour excision (radical prostatectomy). The availability of a serum marker (prostate-specific antigen) for monitoring patients after prostate biopsy or prostatectomy would also significantly impact the clinical utility of histopathological data in these specimens. While it is necessary to report all mandatory data items, pathologists should focus their resources on data that are of clinical significance in an individual case. A pragmatic approach to prostate biopsy reporting with less emphasis on precise determination of tumour extent and grade is recommended.
{"title":"Personalized prostate pathology reporting: Focus on communication and clinical utility","authors":"Murali Varma, Lawrence D True","doi":"10.1111/his.70000","DOIUrl":"10.1111/his.70000","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Histopathology parameters are generally critical for the management of prostate cancer. Current practice is focussed on accuracy, precision, reproducibility, standardization and completeness of this data collection. This review discusses issues with this reporting practice and suggests a simpler alternative approach focussed on the clinical utility of pathology data and effective communication of the histopathology ‘message’. The principles of prostate cancer detection and management are significantly different from those of other cancers. These differences could have important implications for the histopathological diagnosis and reporting of prostate cancer. Management decisions are often based on pathology data from nontargeted prostate biopsies that are subject to significant sampling error, which precludes accurate determination of tumour size and grade. In contrast to other solid tumours, definitive tumour size, grade, and stage are available only in the minority of patients who have undergone complete tumour excision (radical prostatectomy). The availability of a serum marker (prostate-specific antigen) for monitoring patients after prostate biopsy or prostatectomy would also significantly impact the clinical utility of histopathological data in these specimens. While it is necessary to report all mandatory data items, pathologists should focus their resources on data that are of clinical significance in an individual case. A pragmatic approach to prostate biopsy reporting with less emphasis on precise determination of tumour extent and grade is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":13219,"journal":{"name":"Histopathology","volume":"88 1","pages":"53-64"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/his.70000","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145742393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Urine cytology has long been a challenging diagnostic modality due to its low sensitivity for low-grade urothelial neoplasms and high interobserver variability. The introduction of The Paris System (TPS) in 2016 marked a pivotal shift towards standardisation, with a primary focus on detecting high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). This review evaluates the impact of TPS on diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility. It also highlights the system's limitations, including issues with nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio estimation, cellular degeneration, and the underrepresentation of HGUC variants. The second edition of TPS (TPS 2.0) addresses many of these concerns, offering refined criteria and visual aids. However, further improvements are needed, particularly in the integration of molecular diagnostics and artificial intelligence.
{"title":"The Paris system for reporting urinary cytology: what worked and what still needs to be improved","authors":"Eva M Wojcik","doi":"10.1111/his.70038","DOIUrl":"10.1111/his.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urine cytology has long been a challenging diagnostic modality due to its low sensitivity for low-grade urothelial neoplasms and high interobserver variability. The introduction of The Paris System (TPS) in 2016 marked a pivotal shift towards standardisation, with a primary focus on detecting high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). This review evaluates the impact of TPS on diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility. It also highlights the system's limitations, including issues with nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio estimation, cellular degeneration, and the underrepresentation of HGUC variants. The second edition of TPS (TPS 2.0) addresses many of these concerns, offering refined criteria and visual aids. However, further improvements are needed, particularly in the integration of molecular diagnostics and artificial intelligence.</p>","PeriodicalId":13219,"journal":{"name":"Histopathology","volume":"88 1","pages":"131-136"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/his.70038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145742353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle R Downes, Theodorus H van der Kwast, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Liang Cheng
Bladder cancer grading provides important prognostic information to clinicians, and the assigned grade is used as a variable in risk stratification models. There have been multiple proposed grading schemes over the last century, with the most widely utilized in contemporary practice being the World Health Organization (WHO) 1973 and 2004 schemes, with WHO 2004 used almost exclusively in North America, and dual grading using both 2004 and 1973 is in widespread use in Europe. Recently, there has been increased interest in hybrid grading schemes for papillary bladder cancer. These combine features from both aforementioned schemes and have demonstrated prognostic performance that exceeds WHO 2004 and WHO 1973. In this article, we review the historical background and new concepts in bladder cancer grading, highlight the opinions and perspectives of clinicians and pathologists, and assess the challenges along with evidence for and against different grading schemes. We discuss the potential contribution of hybrid 3-tier grading of bladder cancer and how this could impact the classification of papillary urothelial neoplasms and shape future grading scheme proposals.
{"title":"Grading of bladder cancer: updates, controversies and practical solutions","authors":"Michelle R Downes, Theodorus H van der Kwast, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Liang Cheng","doi":"10.1111/his.15559","DOIUrl":"10.1111/his.15559","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bladder cancer grading provides important prognostic information to clinicians, and the assigned grade is used as a variable in risk stratification models. There have been multiple proposed grading schemes over the last century, with the most widely utilized in contemporary practice being the World Health Organization (WHO) 1973 and 2004 schemes, with WHO 2004 used almost exclusively in North America, and dual grading using both 2004 and 1973 is in widespread use in Europe. Recently, there has been increased interest in hybrid grading schemes for papillary bladder cancer. These combine features from both aforementioned schemes and have demonstrated prognostic performance that exceeds WHO 2004 and WHO 1973. In this article, we review the historical background and new concepts in bladder cancer grading, highlight the opinions and perspectives of clinicians and pathologists, and assess the challenges along with evidence for and against different grading schemes. We discuss the potential contribution of hybrid 3-tier grading of bladder cancer and how this could impact the classification of papillary urothelial neoplasms and shape future grading scheme proposals.</p>","PeriodicalId":13219,"journal":{"name":"Histopathology","volume":"88 1","pages":"86-107"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/his.15559","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145742343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jeanne M Dsouza, Erolcan Sayar, Michael T Schweizer, Stephanie Harmon, Colm Morrissey, Himisha Beltran, Peter S Nelson, Liang Cheng, Chien-Kuang Cornelia Ding, Michael C Haffner
Metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) is characterized by molecular and phenotypic heterogeneity. With increasing guideline-driven use of metastatic biopsies, more mPC specimens are being evaluated in surgical pathology. However, unlike localized prostate cancer, no standardized framework currently exists to guide the diagnostic workup of metastatic biopsies or reliably determine phenotypic subtypes. While many mPCs retain conventional acinar features, a growing subset exhibits phenotypic plasticity – including loss of prostate epithelial identity and emergence of neuroendocrine or other divergent lineages. This phenotypic diversity often occurs in castration-resistant prostate cancer as a mechanism of resistance to chronic androgen receptor pathway inhibition and is characterized by genomic alterations and epigenetic reprogramming. This review outlines the histologic and molecular spectrum of mPC and proposes a practical, pathology-informed diagnostic approach integrating morphologic assessment and immunohistochemistry. Adoption of a standardized diagnostic framework and multidisciplinary integration will be useful for employing precision oncology in advanced mPC.
{"title":"Molecular subtypes of metastatic prostate cancer: from pathophysiology to diagnosis","authors":"Jeanne M Dsouza, Erolcan Sayar, Michael T Schweizer, Stephanie Harmon, Colm Morrissey, Himisha Beltran, Peter S Nelson, Liang Cheng, Chien-Kuang Cornelia Ding, Michael C Haffner","doi":"10.1111/his.70033","DOIUrl":"10.1111/his.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) is characterized by molecular and phenotypic heterogeneity. With increasing guideline-driven use of metastatic biopsies, more mPC specimens are being evaluated in surgical pathology. However, unlike localized prostate cancer, no standardized framework currently exists to guide the diagnostic workup of metastatic biopsies or reliably determine phenotypic subtypes. While many mPCs retain conventional acinar features, a growing subset exhibits phenotypic plasticity – including loss of prostate epithelial identity and emergence of neuroendocrine or other divergent lineages. This phenotypic diversity often occurs in castration-resistant prostate cancer as a mechanism of resistance to chronic androgen receptor pathway inhibition and is characterized by genomic alterations and epigenetic reprogramming. This review outlines the histologic and molecular spectrum of mPC and proposes a practical, pathology-informed diagnostic approach integrating morphologic assessment and immunohistochemistry. Adoption of a standardized diagnostic framework and multidisciplinary integration will be useful for employing precision oncology in advanced mPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13219,"journal":{"name":"Histopathology","volume":"88 1","pages":"24-39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/his.70033","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145742351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Felix Bremmer, Fleur Webster, Gedske Daugaard, Robert J. Hamilton, Muhammad T. Idrees, Chia-Sui Kao, Kosuke Miyai, Maria Rosaria Raspollini, John R. Srigley, Satish Tickoo, Asli Yilmaz, Thomas Wagner, Daniel M. Berney
To summarise the content and significance of the recently published second edition International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) histopathology dataset for testicular germ cell tumours, covering the Orchiectomy specimen dataset. We highlight key updates from the first editions, including alignment with the 5th edition World Health Organization (WHO) Classification, revised staging criteria, clarified core data elements versus non-core elements and the evidentiary basis underpinning these changes. A review of the ICCR 2nd edition dataset for Orchiectomy specimens of primary testicular tumours was performed, focusing on their development by an international expert committee using a consensus-based approach. Core (required) and non-core (recommended) data elements were identified along with the level of evidence supporting each, following National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) criteria. Changes from the first edition were extracted by comparing dataset content and notes, informed by up-to-date literature through July 2024. The 2nd edition Orchiectomy dataset provides an integrated, harmonised framework for reporting testicular germ cell tumours. The dataset incorporates the WHO 5th Edition Classification of Urinary and Male Genital Tumours. Pathological staging criteria have been updated to align with the 8th edition Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) definitions. The second edition of this dataset includes changes to align the dataset with the WHO Classification of Tumours, Urinary and Male Genital Tumours, 5th edition, 2022. The ICCR dataset includes the 5th edition Corrigenda, July 2024. It was agreed that this dataset is not suitable for non-germ cell tumours, with the hope that a new dataset, especially for sex-cord stromal tumours, would be developed. The 2nd edition Orchiectomy dataset represents an authoritative, up-to-date standard for pathology reporting of primary testicular germ cell tumours. By incorporating the WHO 5th edition classifications, current TNM staging and the latest evidence on prognostic factors, this dataset facilitates uniform reporting and prognostication. The ICCR dataset underscores core data required for patient management decisions (e.g., adjuvant therapy in Stage I disease, post-chemotherapy management) while providing flexibility through non-core elements for additional useful information. Adoption of this internationally vetted dataset will enhance consistency, assist multidisciplinary treatment planning and align pathology reports with modern consensus guidelines and classifications. The dataset can be used in both high-resource and limited-resource settings without compromising the essential reporting standards.
{"title":"Second edition ICCR dataset for testicular germ cell tumours: a reporting guide for histopathological diagnosis of orchiectomy specimens","authors":"Felix Bremmer, Fleur Webster, Gedske Daugaard, Robert J. Hamilton, Muhammad T. Idrees, Chia-Sui Kao, Kosuke Miyai, Maria Rosaria Raspollini, John R. Srigley, Satish Tickoo, Asli Yilmaz, Thomas Wagner, Daniel M. Berney","doi":"10.1111/his.70041","DOIUrl":"10.1111/his.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<p>To summarise the content and significance of the recently published second edition International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) histopathology dataset for testicular germ cell tumours, covering the Orchiectomy specimen dataset. We highlight key updates from the first editions, including alignment with the 5th edition World Health Organization (WHO) Classification, revised staging criteria, clarified core data elements versus non-core elements and the evidentiary basis underpinning these changes. A review of the ICCR 2nd edition dataset for Orchiectomy specimens of primary testicular tumours was performed, focusing on their development by an international expert committee using a consensus-based approach. Core (required) and non-core (recommended) data elements were identified along with the level of evidence supporting each, following National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) criteria. Changes from the first edition were extracted by comparing dataset content and notes, informed by up-to-date literature through July 2024. The 2nd edition Orchiectomy dataset provides an integrated, harmonised framework for reporting testicular germ cell tumours. The dataset incorporates the WHO 5th Edition Classification of Urinary and Male Genital Tumours. Pathological staging criteria have been updated to align with the 8th edition Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) definitions. The second edition of this dataset includes changes to align the dataset with the WHO Classification of Tumours, Urinary and Male Genital Tumours, 5th edition, 2022. The ICCR dataset includes the 5th edition Corrigenda, July 2024. It was agreed that this dataset is not suitable for non-germ cell tumours, with the hope that a new dataset, especially for sex-cord stromal tumours, would be developed. The 2nd edition Orchiectomy dataset represents an authoritative, up-to-date standard for pathology reporting of primary testicular germ cell tumours. By incorporating the WHO 5th edition classifications, current TNM staging and the latest evidence on prognostic factors, this dataset facilitates uniform reporting and prognostication. The ICCR dataset underscores core data required for patient management decisions (e.g., adjuvant therapy in Stage I disease, post-chemotherapy management) while providing flexibility through non-core elements for additional useful information. Adoption of this internationally vetted dataset will enhance consistency, assist multidisciplinary treatment planning and align pathology reports with modern consensus guidelines and classifications. The dataset can be used in both high-resource and limited-resource settings without compromising the essential reporting standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":13219,"journal":{"name":"Histopathology","volume":"88 1","pages":"252-264"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/his.70041","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145742374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jeanne M Dsouza, Erolcan Sayar, Michael T Schweizer, Stephanie Harmon, Colm Morrissey, Himisha Beltran, Peter S Nelson, Liang Cheng, Chien-Kuang Cornelia Ding, Michael C Haffner, João Lobo, Andres M Acosta
The cover image is based on the reviews Molecular subtypes of metastatic prostate cancer: from pathophysiology to diagnosis by Jeanne M Dsouza et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/his.70033 and Advances in non-germ cell tumours of the testis: focus on new molecular developments in sex cord-stromal tumours by João Lobo and Andres M Acosta, https://doi.org/10.1111/his.70006.