Histopathology最新文献

The accurate diagnosis of haematolymphoid malignancies is crucial for effective cancer care, but major obstacles to diagnosis exist in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This article explores the global applicability of current haematolymphoid classification systems, which are predominantly derived from data generated in high-income countries (HICs). Although disproportionately burdened with poor cancer outcomes, LMICs are generally faced with limited diagnostic resources, suboptimal access to therapeutics, and inadequate healthcare infrastructure. The article highlights the challenges faced by LMICs, including inconsistent access to high-quality pathology services, limited availability of advanced diagnostic techniques, and a lack of population-based cancer registry data. It also discusses the progress made in narrowing the gap between LMICs and HICs, such as the introduction of resource-adapted classifications, improved guidance on essential diagnostic tools, and strengthening of in-country professional pathology networks. Innovative diagnostic approaches, including gene expression profiling and machine learning, represent potential solutions for improving the diagnostic accuracy in LMICs, but addressable gaps remain. Recommendations are suggested for sustainable investments in diagnostic infrastructure, capacity-building, and population-based cancer registries to enhance the global applicability of haematolymphoid classification systems and improve outcomes for patients in LMICs.

Introduction and objectives: Fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is a new imaging modality capable of generating digital microscopic resolution scans of fresh surgical specimens, and holds potential as an alternative to frozen section (FS) analysis for intra-operative assessment of surgical margins. Previously, we described the LaserSAFE technique as an application of FCM for margin assessment in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the Histolog® scanner. This study describes the accuracy and inter-rater agreement of FCM imaging compared to corresponding paraffin-embedded analysis (PA) among four blinded pathologists for the presence of positive surgical margins (PSM).

Materials and methods: RARP specimens from patients enrolled in the control arm of the NeuroSAFE PROOF study (NCT03317990) were analysed from April 2022 to February 2023. Prostate specimens were imaged using the Histolog® scanner before formalin fixation and PA. Four trained assessors, blinded to PA, reviewed and analysed FCM images of the posterolateral prostatic surface.

Results: A total of 31 prostate specimens were included in the study. PA per lateral side of the prostate identified 11 instances of positive margins. Among the four histopathologists included in our study, FCM achieved a sensitivity of 73-91 and specificity of 94-100% for the presence of PSM. Fleiss' Kappa for inter-rater agreement on PSM was 0.78 (95% confidence interval = 0.64-0.92), indicating substantial agreement.

Conclusion: This blinded analysis of FCM versus PA among histopathologists with different experience levels demonstrated high accuracy and substantial inter-rater agreement for diagnosing PSM. This supports the role of the FCM as an alternative to FS.

The mature splenic B-cell lymphomas are an enigmatic group of lymphoid neoplasms that have long caused significant difficulty for the practicing pathologist due to overlapping diagnostic features among entities and the decreasing availability of splenic tissue for assessment. While some entities have highly characteristic and specific clinicopathological features (e.g. hairy cell leukaemia), others are substantially more difficult to recognise (e.g. splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma). At the same time, classification systems have been evolving, resulting in multiple changes to the boundaries among these entities and even the existence of some entities in their own right. Moreover, unbiased multi-omic interrogation (whole genome/transcriptome sequencing, methylome) of the splenic B-cell lymphomas over the past decade has given us significant insights into the underling biology of these neoplasms. We present a clinicopathological perspective on the historical, current and future state of the diagnosis and classification of splenic B-cell lymphomas integrating multi-omic data and highlighting areas of focus for the field in order to continue to strive to improve patient outcomes through accurate diagnosis.

Here we review the 'what and how' of molecular techniques used in the context of haematopathological diagnostics of both lymphoid and myeloid neoplasms. Keeping in mind that the required resources for molecular testing are not universally available, we will not only discuss novel and emerging techniques that allow more high-throughput and sophisticated analyses of lymphoid and myeloid neoplasms, but also the more classical, low-cost alternatives and even some workarounds for molecular testing approaches. In this review we also address other key aspects around molecular techniques for haematopatholgy diagnostics, including preanalytics, data interpretation, and data management, bioinformatics, and interlaboratory precision and performance evaluation.

B-acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) is a haematological disease resulting from haematopoietic system dysfunction, leading to the unchecked growth of immature B lymphoblasts. The disease's complexity is underscored by the spectrum of genetic aberrations that underlie B-ALL entities, necessitating advanced genetic analyses for precise classification and risk determination. Prior to the adoption of next-generation sequencing into standard diagnostic practices, up to 30% of B-ALL cases were not assigned to specific entities due to the limitations of traditional diagnostic methods. The advent of comprehensive genomic analysis, especially whole-genome transcriptome sequencing, has significantly enhanced our understanding of B-ALL's molecular heterogeneity, paving the way for the exploration of novel, tailored treatment strategies. Furthermore, recent technological innovations, such as optical genome mapping, methylation profiling, and single-cell sequencing, have propelled forward the fields of cancer research and B-ALL management. These innovations introduce novel diagnostic approaches and prognostic markers, facilitating a deeper, more nuanced understanding of individual patient disease profiles. This review focuses on the latest diagnostic standards and assays for B-ALL, the importance of new technologies and biomarkers in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, and the expected role of innovative advancements in the future diagnosis and treatment of B-ALL.

Aims: CIC-rearranged sarcomas (CRS) are clinically aggressive undifferentiated round cell sarcomas (URCS), commonly driven by CIC::DUX4. Due to the repetitive nature of DUX4 and the variability of the fusion breakpoints, CIC::DUX4 fusion may be missed by molecular testing. Immunohistochemical (IHC) stains have been studied as surrogates for the CIC::DUX4 fusion. We aim to assess the performance of DUX4 IHC in the work-up of CRS and its expression in non-CRS round cell or epithelioid neoplasms.

Methods and results: Cases of molecularly confirmed CRS (n = 48) and non-CRS (n = 105) were included. CRS cases consisted of 35 females and 13 males, with ages ranging from less than 1 year to 67 years (median = 41 years). Among the molecularly confirmed non-CRS cases, C-terminal DUX4 expression was investigated in Ewing sarcomas (38 cases), alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas (18 cases), desmoplastic small round cell tumours (12 cases) and synovial sarcomas (n = five), as well as in non-mesenchymal neoplasms such as SMARCA4/SMARCB1-deficient tumours (n = five), carcinomas of unknown primary (n = three) and haematolymphoid neoplasms (four cases). DUX4 IHC was considered positive when strong nuclear expression was detected in more than 50% of neoplastic cells. When used as a surrogate for the diagnosis of CRS, the sensitivity and specificity of DUX4 IHC was 98 and 100%, respectively. Only one CRS case was negative for DUX4 IHC and harboured a CIC::FOXO4 fusion.

Conclusions: DUX4 IHC is a highly sensitive and specific surrogate marker for the presence of CIC::DUX4 fusion, demonstrating its utility in establishing a diagnosis of CRS.

Aims: Although turmeric is commonly ingested and well tolerated, there is increasing evidence that over-the-counter turmeric supplements can cause drug-induced liver injury. We sought to thoroughly characterise clinicopathological features of patients for whom liver injury was attributed clinically to turmeric supplements.

Methods and results: We identified 11 patients via retrospective pathology archive review: 10 females (91%) and one male, with a median age of 58 years (range = 37-66 years). Six patients (55%) were asymptomatic with abnormal liver function tests, while five patients (45%) presented with malaise and/or jaundice. Ten patients (91%) showed predominant transaminase abnormalities, while one exhibited predominant alkaline phosphatase elevation. Histologically, biopsies showed acute hepatitis (eight cases, 73%, including five pan-lobular and three zone 3-predominant inflammation), scattered lobular aggregates of histiocytes (two; 18%) and a chronic hepatitis pattern of injury (one; 9%). Mild bile duct injury was present in five biopsies (45%). All patients stopped ingesting turmeric supplements after presenting with liver injury, and four patients additionally received steroid therapy; liver function tests normalised in all patients. Roussel Uclaf causality assessment method (RUCAM) analysis estimated the likelihood of turmeric supplement-associated liver injury to be probable (eight cases) and possible (three).

Conclusions: Histological features in the 'possible' cases were consistent with drug-induced injury, highlighting the added benefit of histological analysis relative to RUCAM analysis isolation. This study underscores the need to obtain a full history of over-the-counter medications and supplements when investigating aetiologies for liver injury, including supplements purportedly containing innocuous compounds such as turmeric.

Aims: Since 2020 there has been an increase in the number of polyps removed from patients scoped for the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) of England. General cellular pathology workload also continues to increase disproportionately ahead of consultant pathologist numbers in the United Kingdom. The Optical Diagnosis initiative for BCSP patients has not yet, and may not be, implemented at every hospital in England. The following study therefore aimed to determine whether only a certain number of removed polyps need to be histologically assessed to consistently guide a BCSP patient's post-polypectomy management, and whether all remaining smaller polyps beyond that number could then be discarded.

Methods: This retrospective study considered all BCSP specimens/cases submitted to the Cellular Pathology department of a large English teaching hospital from 2016 to 2024. Only cases with six or more resected polyps, for which the endoscopic report stated individual sizes, were included in the final study cohort.

Results: Of the 8066 BCSP cases submitted to the aforementioned department, there were six or more polyps for 345 cases. Analysis of the final study cohort of 135 cases showed that assessment of the seven largest polyps measured endoscopically was sufficient to correctly guide follow-up management of the BCSP patient as per the 2020 British Society of Gastroenterology post-polypectomy guidelines.

Conclusions: When colonoscopy of a BCSP patient leads to removal of multiple polyps, only the seven largest polyps need to be assessed histologically and the remaining smaller polyps could be discarded with no impact to the patient's BCSP-related management.