Understanding how human activity impacts natural systems is crucial for maintaining ecosystem health and the services these provide for societies. Phenotypic plasticity - the regulated expression of different phenotypes by a single genotype - is the most effective response to increase resistance or resilience of phenotypes to rapidly changing environments. Here, we review the mechanisms that underlie phenotypic plasticity in animals. Understanding the regulatory mechanisms is important because these determine the time course of establishment and persistence of alternative phenotypes. We propose that regulation of trans- and intergenerational plasticity, developmental plasticity and reversible acclimation involves (i) environmental information acquisition, (ii) signal integration, and (iii) translation of environmental information to alter phenotypes. We provide a high-level overview of each of these stages with the aim of summarising current knowledge and making it accessible to a broader audience who are not necessarily expert in neuroendocrine and molecular biology. Information acquisition occurs primarily by sensors that transduce environmental information (e.g. temperature, light, chemicals, etc.) to the central nervous system. An exception is AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) that senses cellular energy levels and interacts locally and with neuroendocrine systems to adjust anabolic and catabolic metabolism. Signal integration is achieved primarily by neural and endocrine mechanisms. The major players are the autonomic nervous system, the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal/interrenal (HPA/I), the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid (HPT), and the hypothalamus-pituitary-somatotrophic (HPS) axes, which receive environmental information from the brain and transmit it via hormone signalling. Phenotypic effects of these major axes can be directly to the target tissues, or via epigenetically modified gene expression programs. DNA methylation, histone modifications, and microRNAs are the principal epigenetic processes, of which the first two are regulated by neuroendocrine signalling. Importantly, all of these processes (AMPK, neuroendocrine, epigenetic) interact with each other so that regulation occurs in a network-like manner rather than by individual regulators alone. Nonetheless, an appreciation of individual mechanisms is an essential starting point that can guide future research into more complex interactions to advance understanding of the evolution and ecological importance of plasticity.
For the vast majority of the evolutionary history of Homo sapiens, a range of natural environments defined the parameters within which selection shaped human biology. Although human-induced alterations to the terrestrial biosphere have been evident for over 10,000 years, the pace and scale of change has accelerated dramatically since the onset of the Industrial Revolution in the late 18th century. Industrialisation has profoundly transformed our various natural habitats, driving rapid urban expansion, increasing reliance on fossil fuel energy and causing environmental contamination, ecosystem degradation and biodiversity loss. Today, most of the world's population resides in highly industrialised urban areas. These new primary human habitats differ fundamentally from our ancestral natural habitats, creating novel environmental challenges while, simultaneously, lacking key natural features linked to health and function. Although the adaptive capacity of humans has enabled survival in diverse and fluctuating environmental conditions, this capacity is limited. It is possible that the rapid industrialisation of our habitat is outpacing our adaptive capacity and is imposing selective pressures that threaten our evolutionary fitness. A growing body of observational and experimental evidence suggests that industrialisation negatively impacts key biological functions essential for survival and reproduction and, therefore, evolutionary fitness. Specifically, environmental contamination arising directly from industrial activities (e.g. air, noise and light pollution, microplastic accumulation) is linked to impaired reproductive, immune, cognitive and physical function. Chronic activation of the stress response systems, which further impairs these biological functions, also appears more pronounced in industrialised areas. Here, we consider whether the rapid and extensive environmental shifts of the Anthropocene have compromised the fitness of Homo sapiens. We begin by contrasting contemporary and ancestral human habitats before assessing the effects of these changes on core biological functions that underpin evolutionary fitness. We then ask whether industrialisation has created a mismatch between our primarily nature-adapted biology and the novel challenges imposed by contemporary industrialised environments - a possibility that we frame through the lens of the Environmental Mismatch Hypothesis. Finally, we explore experimental approaches to test this hypothesis and discuss the broader implications of such a mismatch.