Objective: To determine the regional impact of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MRDOs) and Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) among a tertiary care hospital and surrounding facilities including long-term care facilities (LTCFs).
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Methods: Patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital from July 2019 to July 2021 were recruited if their clinically collected cultures grew the following pathogens: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance, Carbapenem-resistant Enterobaterales, Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, and C. difficile. Patient characteristics including admission and discharge pathway were collected. For the isolates of MRSA, ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (E. coli), and C. difficile, a molecular epidemiological analysis was conducted, utilizing the PCR-based Open-Reading Frame Typing (POT) method.
Results: Three hundred-five patients were identified with a total of 332 culture specimens of the target pathogens. The top three were 132 MRSA isolates (43.3%, out of 305), 97 ESBL E. coli (31.8%), and 32 ESBL Enterobacterales (non-E. coli) (10.5%). The target pathogens were more detectable within 3 days among patients admitted from LTCFs or other hospitals than those admitted from home (Odds Ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 2.8-7.6, p-value < 0.001). The molecular epidemiological analysis suggested the transmissions of MRSA, ESBL E. coli and C. difficile occurred 52 out of 111 patients within the in-hospital environment, and 7 out of 128 within the prehospital environment, respectively.
Conclusions: MDROs/C. difficile transmission is prevalent within a tertiary care hospital and further complicated by its inter-facility transmission across surrounding LTCFs and hospitals in Japan.
{"title":"Transmission of MRSA, ESBL <i>E. coli</i>, and <i>C. difficile</i> within a tertiary care hospital and across surrounding facilities in Japan: a molecular epidemiological study with the PCR-based Open-reading frame typing.","authors":"Hiroki Saito, Satoshi Miike, Tatsuya Ohno, Momoko Anzai, Fumimasa Kasai, Akiko Hosoyama, Tomomi Takakura, Yosuke Tanaka, Shigeki Fujitani","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.178","DOIUrl":"10.1017/ice.2024.178","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the regional impact of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MRDOs) and <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> (<i>C. difficile</i>) among a tertiary care hospital and surrounding facilities including long-term care facilities (LTCFs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital from July 2019 to July 2021 were recruited if their clinically collected cultures grew the following pathogens: Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA), Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacterales, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> with difficult-to-treat resistance, Carbapenem-resistant Enterobaterales, Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, and <i>C. difficile</i>. Patient characteristics including admission and discharge pathway were collected. For the isolates of MRSA, ESBL-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>), and <i>C. difficile</i>, a molecular epidemiological analysis was conducted, utilizing the PCR-based Open-Reading Frame Typing (POT) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred-five patients were identified with a total of 332 culture specimens of the target pathogens. The top three were 132 MRSA isolates (43.3%, out of 305), 97 ESBL <i>E. coli</i> (31.8%), and 32 ESBL Enterobacterales (non-<i>E. coli</i>) (10.5%). The target pathogens were more detectable within 3 days among patients admitted from LTCFs or other hospitals than those admitted from home (Odds Ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 2.8-7.6, p-value < 0.001). The molecular epidemiological analysis suggested the transmissions of MRSA, ESBL <i>E. coli</i> and <i>C. difficile</i> occurred 52 out of 111 patients within the in-hospital environment, and 7 out of 128 within the prehospital environment, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDROs/<i>C. difficile</i> transmission is prevalent within a tertiary care hospital and further complicated by its inter-facility transmission across surrounding LTCFs and hospitals in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717480/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Claire E Ciarkowski, Hannah N Imlay, Chloe Bryson-Cahn, Jeannie D Chan, Whitney Hartlage, Adam L Hersh, John B Lynch, Natalia Martinez-Paz, Emily S Spivak, Hannah Hardin, Andrea T White, Chaorong Wu, Valerie M Vaughn, Zahra Kassamali Escobar
Background: Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) treatment is a common form of antibiotic overuse and diagnostic error. Antibiotic stewardship using the inappropriate diagnosis of urinary tract infection (ID-UTI) measure has reduced ASB treatment in diverse hospitals. However, critical access hospitals (CAHs) have differing resources that could impede stewardship. We aimed to determine if stewardship including the ID-UTI measure could reduce ASB treatment in CAHs.
Methods: From October 2022 to July 2023, ten CAHs participated in an Intensive Quality Improvement Cohort (IQIC) program including 3 interventions to reduce ASB treatment: 1) learning labs (ie, didactics with shared learning), 2) mentoring, and 3) data-driven performance reports including hospital peer comparison based on the ID-UTI measure. To assess effectiveness of the IQIC program, change in the ID-UTI measure (ie, percentage of patients treated for a UTI who had ASB) was compared to two non-equivalent control outcomes (antibiotic duration and unjustified fluoroquinolone use).
Results: Ten CAHs abstracted a total of 608 positive urine culture cases. Over the cohort period, the percentage of patients treated for a UTI who had ASB declined (aOR per month = 0.935, 95% CI: 0.873, 1.001, P = 0.055) from 28.4% (range across hospitals, 0%-63%) in the first to 18.6% (range, 0%-33%) in the final month. In contrast, antibiotic duration and unjustified fluoroquinolone use were unchanged (P = 0.768 and 0.567, respectively).
Conclusions: The IQIC intervention, including learning labs, mentoring, and performance reports using the ID-UTI measure, was associated with a non-significant decrease in treatment of ASB, while control outcomes (duration and unjustified fluoroquinolone use) did not change.
{"title":"Antimicrobial stewardship to reduce overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in critical access hospitals: measuring a quality improvement intervention.","authors":"Claire E Ciarkowski, Hannah N Imlay, Chloe Bryson-Cahn, Jeannie D Chan, Whitney Hartlage, Adam L Hersh, John B Lynch, Natalia Martinez-Paz, Emily S Spivak, Hannah Hardin, Andrea T White, Chaorong Wu, Valerie M Vaughn, Zahra Kassamali Escobar","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.171","DOIUrl":"10.1017/ice.2024.171","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) treatment is a common form of antibiotic overuse and diagnostic error. Antibiotic stewardship using the inappropriate diagnosis of urinary tract infection (ID-UTI) measure has reduced ASB treatment in diverse hospitals. However, critical access hospitals (CAHs) have differing resources that could impede stewardship. We aimed to determine if stewardship including the ID-UTI measure could reduce ASB treatment in CAHs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2022 to July 2023, ten CAHs participated in an Intensive Quality Improvement Cohort (IQIC) program including 3 interventions to reduce ASB treatment: 1) learning labs (ie, didactics with shared learning), 2) mentoring, and 3) data-driven performance reports including hospital peer comparison based on the ID-UTI measure. To assess effectiveness of the IQIC program, change in the ID-UTI measure (ie, percentage of patients treated for a UTI who had ASB) was compared to two non-equivalent control outcomes (antibiotic duration and unjustified fluoroquinolone use).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten CAHs abstracted a total of 608 positive urine culture cases. Over the cohort period, the percentage of patients treated for a UTI who had ASB declined (aOR per month = 0.935, 95% CI: 0.873, 1.001, <i>P</i> = 0.055) from 28.4% (range across hospitals, 0%-63%) in the first to 18.6% (range, 0%-33%) in the final month. In contrast, antibiotic duration and unjustified fluoroquinolone use were unchanged (<i>P</i> = 0.768 and 0.567, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IQIC intervention, including learning labs, mentoring, and performance reports using the ID-UTI measure, was associated with a non-significant decrease in treatment of ASB, while control outcomes (duration and unjustified fluoroquinolone use) did not change.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790331/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Inappropriate antibiotic use in infants can have multiple adverse effects and contribute to the development of bacteria resistant to antimicrobials. Antimicrobial stewardship programs can reduce unnecessary antibiotic use in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an antimicrobial stewardship program implemented in 2017 in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at The Children's Hospital Iceland.
Materials and methods: The study included all infants who were admitted to the NICU during the study period (January 1st 2012-October 31st 2020). Data was collected from hospital records. Three periods were defined: preimplementation (2012-2014), peri-implementation (2015-2016) and postimplementation (2017-October 2020). Antibiotic use was quantified using days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 bed days (BD). For statistical analysis the pre- and postimplementation periods were compared.
Results: Antibiotics were administered in 38.6% (1372) of admissions to the NICU during the study period. Antimicrobial use per year decreased from 584.6 to 317.1 DOT/1000 BD per year (P < 0.001). Use of broad-spectrum antibiotics decreased significantly. The average number of BD per month decreased from 297.8 to 220.9 BD/month (P = 0.0096). There were no significant changes in the length of stay for each infant or the proportion of readmissions or retreatment.
Conclusion: Increased awareness of appropriate use of antimicrobials in the NICU led to shorter treatments and less use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. No increase in adverse effects such as readmissions or retreatment was observed.
{"title":"Improved use of antibiotics following implementation of antimicrobial stewardship in a neonatal intensive care unit.","authors":"Arna Yr Karelsdottir, Thorunn Oskarsdottir, Olof Eir Hoffritz, Thordur Thorkelsson, Asgeir Haraldsson, Valtyr Thors","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.151","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inappropriate antibiotic use in infants can have multiple adverse effects and contribute to the development of bacteria resistant to antimicrobials. Antimicrobial stewardship programs can reduce unnecessary antibiotic use in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an antimicrobial stewardship program implemented in 2017 in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at The Children's Hospital Iceland.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included all infants who were admitted to the NICU during the study period (January 1<sup>st</sup> 2012-October 31<sup>st</sup> 2020). Data was collected from hospital records. Three periods were defined: preimplementation (2012-2014), peri-implementation (2015-2016) and postimplementation (2017-October 2020). Antibiotic use was quantified using days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 bed days (BD). For statistical analysis the pre- and postimplementation periods were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Antibiotics were administered in 38.6% (1372) of admissions to the NICU during the study period. Antimicrobial use per year decreased from 584.6 to 317.1 DOT/1000 BD per year (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Use of broad-spectrum antibiotics decreased significantly. The average number of BD per month decreased from 297.8 to 220.9 BD/month (<i>P</i> = 0.0096). There were no significant changes in the length of stay for each infant or the proportion of readmissions or retreatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased awareness of appropriate use of antimicrobials in the NICU led to shorter treatments and less use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. No increase in adverse effects such as readmissions or retreatment was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Clyde D Ford, Bert K Lopansri, Bradley D Hunter, Jacob Wilkes, Julie Asch, Daanish Hoda
Objective: To better delineate multiplexed gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panel (MGPP) diagnostic and therapeutic stewardship for patients undergoing treatment for acute leukemia including indications and benefits of testing, optimal timing, and interpretation of results.
Study design: We retrieved all MGPP ordered on 662 consecutive patients admitted with newly diagnosed acute leukemia between June 2015 and May 2024.
Setting: Regional referral center for acute leukemia.
Results: Fifty-one (17%) of 305 MGPP obtained on the 198 patients who underwent testing identified at least one and 4 (1%) more than one diarrheagenic pathogen. The probability of a positive result was greater if obtained as an outpatient [20/52(38%)], but was not related to type of leukemia, sex, or age. Among the positive results, the pathogens identified included Clostridioides difficile (78% of tests), norovirus (16%), diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (6%), adenovirus 40/41 (4%), and Giardia lamblia (4%). The results of 30 of the 305 tests resulted in a change in treatment (28 C. difficile, 2 G. lamblia). For the MGPP C. difficile results with an accompanying toxin determination, this included treatment following 16/19 tests with a positive toxin result and 11/19 with a negative. Actionable results other than C. difficile were rarely seen in the inpatient population.
Conclusions: MGPP testing is most useful when administered as an outpatient and of little benefit for inpatients with hospital-onset diarrhea. Since MGPP is sensitive and does not distinguish between colonization and causes of diarrhea, caution is needed in interpretation of results, especially for toxin-negative C. difficile.
{"title":"Multiplexed gastrointestinal PCR panels for the evaluation of diarrhea in patients with acute leukemia.","authors":"Clyde D Ford, Bert K Lopansri, Bradley D Hunter, Jacob Wilkes, Julie Asch, Daanish Hoda","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better delineate multiplexed gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panel (MGPP) diagnostic and therapeutic stewardship for patients undergoing treatment for acute leukemia including indications and benefits of testing, optimal timing, and interpretation of results.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We retrieved all MGPP ordered on 662 consecutive patients admitted with newly diagnosed acute leukemia between June 2015 and May 2024.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Regional referral center for acute leukemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one (17%) of 305 MGPP obtained on the 198 patients who underwent testing identified at least one and 4 (1%) more than one diarrheagenic pathogen. The probability of a positive result was greater if obtained as an outpatient [20/52(38%)], but was not related to type of leukemia, sex, or age. Among the positive results, the pathogens identified included <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> (78% of tests), norovirus (16%), diarrheagenic <i>Escherichia coli</i> (6%), adenovirus 40/41 (4%), and <i>Giardia lamblia</i> (4%). The results of 30 of the 305 tests resulted in a change in treatment (28 <i>C. difficile</i>, 2 <i>G. lamblia</i>). For the MGPP <i>C. difficile</i> results with an accompanying toxin determination, this included treatment following 16/19 tests with a positive toxin result and 11/19 with a negative. Actionable results other than <i>C. difficile</i> were rarely seen in the inpatient population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MGPP testing is most useful when administered as an outpatient and of little benefit for inpatients with hospital-onset diarrhea. Since MGPP is sensitive and does not distinguish between colonization and causes of diarrhea, caution is needed in interpretation of results, especially for toxin-negative <i>C. difficile</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142604374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Integrating an industrial hygienist into the infection prevention and control program.","authors":"Angelique Dains, Spencer Baker, Takaaki Kobayashi, Stephanie Holley, Daniel Diekema, Karen Brust","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.123","DOIUrl":"10.1017/ice.2024.123","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142590821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lyn-Li Lim, Kang Wei Esther Lim, Michael J Malloy, Ann Bull, Judith Brett, Leon J Worth
Objective: We aimed to describe the incidence, pathogens, and antimicrobial susceptibility of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in adult intensive care units (ICU).
Design: State surveillance data from 2011 to 2022 were analyzed to identify patient and device days and CLABSI events. Pathogen data were analyzed to determine the most common organisms and patterns of antimicrobial resistance grouped into 3-year time epochs.
Setting: Adult ICU in Victoria, Australia.
Participants: Healthcare organizations participating in CLABSI state surveillance.
Results: 608 events were reported over 751,350 device days. Overall, CLABSI incidence was 0.81 per 1,000 central-line days, with a 49.3% rate reduction from 2011 to 2022 (1.39 to 0.70 per 1,000 central-line days). Overall device utilization ratio was 0.57, with a 15.4% reduction from 2011 to 2022 (0.67 vs 0.56). Of 690 pathogens, the most common by rank order were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS), Candida species, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis. The proportion of CNS-causing events increased by 69.0% from 2011 to 2022; this trend was not observed for other organisms. For every increase in epoch, a 33% decrease in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), 4% increase in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and 12% increase in ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli pathogens were observed.
Conclusions: We demonstrate a decreasing incidence of CLABSI in Victorian adult ICU and an increasing burden of infections due to CNS. No significant time trend increases in antimicrobial-resistant organisms, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, and ceftriaxone-resistant E. coli were observed. These findings are relevant for identifying priorities for CLABSI prevention in Victorian adult ICU.
{"title":"Antimicrobial-resistant central line-associated bloodstream infections in adult intensive care units: findings from an Australian surveillance network, 2011-2022.","authors":"Lyn-Li Lim, Kang Wei Esther Lim, Michael J Malloy, Ann Bull, Judith Brett, Leon J Worth","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.132","DOIUrl":"10.1017/ice.2024.132","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to describe the incidence, pathogens, and antimicrobial susceptibility of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in adult intensive care units (ICU).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>State surveillance data from 2011 to 2022 were analyzed to identify patient and device days and CLABSI events. Pathogen data were analyzed to determine the most common organisms and patterns of antimicrobial resistance grouped into 3-year time epochs.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Adult ICU in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Healthcare organizations participating in CLABSI state surveillance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>608 events were reported over 751,350 device days. Overall, CLABSI incidence was 0.81 per 1,000 central-line days, with a 49.3% rate reduction from 2011 to 2022 (1.39 to 0.70 per 1,000 central-line days). Overall device utilization ratio was 0.57, with a 15.4% reduction from 2011 to 2022 (0.67 vs 0.56). Of 690 pathogens, the most common by rank order were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS), <i>Candida</i> species, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>. The proportion of CNS-causing events increased by 69.0% from 2011 to 2022; this trend was not observed for other organisms. For every increase in epoch, a 33% decrease in methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> (MRSA), 4% increase in vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus faecium</i>, and 12% increase in ceftriaxone-resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i> pathogens were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrate a decreasing incidence of CLABSI in Victorian adult ICU and an increasing burden of infections due to CNS. No significant time trend increases in antimicrobial-resistant organisms, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant <i>E. faecium</i>, and ceftriaxone-resistant <i>E. coli</i> were observed. These findings are relevant for identifying priorities for CLABSI prevention in Victorian adult ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142590805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maryza Graham, Victoria Hornidge, Gillian Yap, Allen Cheng, Anjali Dhulia, Beena Kumar
{"title":"Sustainability of a customized electronic duplicate order alert for microbiology tests: assessment of alert fatigue 12 to 36 months after implementation.","authors":"Maryza Graham, Victoria Hornidge, Gillian Yap, Allen Cheng, Anjali Dhulia, Beena Kumar","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.183","DOIUrl":"10.1017/ice.2024.183","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142590823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Daniel J Livorsi, Vignesh T Packiam, Qianyi Shi, Steven Y Alberding, Knute D Carter, James A Brown, James B Mason, Jeffrey P Weiss, Ryan L Steinberg
Objective: Post-procedural antimicrobial prophylaxis is not recommended by professional guidelines but is commonly prescribed. We sought to reduce use of post-procedural antimicrobials after common endoscopic urologic procedures.
Design: A before-after, quasi-experimental trial with a baseline (July 2020-June 2022), an implementation (July 2022), and an intervention period (August 2022-July 2023).
Setting: Three participating medical centers.
Intervention: We assessed the effect of a bundled intervention on excess post-procedural antimicrobial use (ie, antimicrobial use on post-procedural day 1) after three types of endoscopic urologic procedures: ureteroscopy and transurethral resection of bladder tumor or prostate. The intervention consisted of education, local champion(s), and audit-and-feedback of data on the frequency of post-procedural antimicrobial-prescribing.
Results: 1,272 procedures were performed across all 3 sites at baseline compared to 525 during the intervention period; 644 (50.6%) patients received excess post-procedural antimicrobials during the baseline period compared to 216 (41.1%) during the intervention period. There was no change in the use of post-procedural antimicrobials at sites 1 and 2 between the baseline and intervention periods. At site 3, the odds of prescribing a post-procedural antimicrobial significantly decreased during the intervention period relative to the baseline time trend (0.09; 95% CI 0.02-0.45). There was no significant increase in post-procedural unplanned visits at any of the sites.
Conclusions: Implementation of a bundled intervention was associated with reduced post-procedural antimicrobial use at one of three sites, with no increase in complications. These findings demonstrate both the safety and challenge of guideline implementation for optimal perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.This trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04196777.
{"title":"A pilot intervention trial to reduce the use of post-procedural antimicrobials after common endourologic surgeries.","authors":"Daniel J Livorsi, Vignesh T Packiam, Qianyi Shi, Steven Y Alberding, Knute D Carter, James A Brown, James B Mason, Jeffrey P Weiss, Ryan L Steinberg","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.172","DOIUrl":"10.1017/ice.2024.172","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Post-procedural antimicrobial prophylaxis is not recommended by professional guidelines but is commonly prescribed. We sought to reduce use of post-procedural antimicrobials after common endoscopic urologic procedures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A before-after, quasi-experimental trial with a baseline (July 2020-June 2022), an implementation (July 2022), and an intervention period (August 2022-July 2023).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three participating medical centers.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>We assessed the effect of a bundled intervention on excess post-procedural antimicrobial use (<i>ie</i>, antimicrobial use on post-procedural day 1) after three types of endoscopic urologic procedures: ureteroscopy and transurethral resection of bladder tumor or prostate. The intervention consisted of education, local champion(s), and audit-and-feedback of data on the frequency of post-procedural antimicrobial-prescribing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,272 procedures were performed across all 3 sites at baseline compared to 525 during the intervention period; 644 (50.6%) patients received excess post-procedural antimicrobials during the baseline period compared to 216 (41.1%) during the intervention period. There was no change in the use of post-procedural antimicrobials at sites 1 and 2 between the baseline and intervention periods. At site 3, the odds of prescribing a post-procedural antimicrobial significantly decreased during the intervention period relative to the baseline time trend (0.09; 95% CI 0.02-0.45). There was no significant increase in post-procedural unplanned visits at any of the sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a bundled intervention was associated with reduced post-procedural antimicrobial use at one of three sites, with no increase in complications. These findings demonstrate both the safety and challenge of guideline implementation for optimal perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.This trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04196777.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717473/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142590801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dara Simcha Petel, Sandra Isabel, Kyong-Soon Lee, Joseph Yuk Ting, David A Kaufman, Pablo Jose Sanchez, Sarah Khan, Kathryn Timberlake, James Wright, Michelle Science
Late-onset sepsis (LOS) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) causes significant morbidity and mortality, yet guidance on empiric management is limited. We surveyed NICUs across Canada and the United States regarding their empiric antimicrobial regimens for LOS, thereby identifying large practice variations and high rates of empiric vancomycin use.
新生儿重症监护室(NICU)中的晚发败血症(LOS)会导致严重的发病率和死亡率,但有关经验性治疗的指导却很有限。我们对加拿大和美国的新生儿重症监护室进行了调查,了解他们对 LOS 的经验性抗菌药物治疗方案,从而发现了很大的实践差异和万古霉素的高使用率。
{"title":"Empiric antibiotic prescribing practices for gram-positive coverage of late-onset sepsis in neonatal intensive care units in North America.","authors":"Dara Simcha Petel, Sandra Isabel, Kyong-Soon Lee, Joseph Yuk Ting, David A Kaufman, Pablo Jose Sanchez, Sarah Khan, Kathryn Timberlake, James Wright, Michelle Science","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.176","DOIUrl":"10.1017/ice.2024.176","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Late-onset sepsis (LOS) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) causes significant morbidity and mortality, yet guidance on empiric management is limited. We surveyed NICUs across Canada and the United States regarding their empiric antimicrobial regimens for LOS, thereby identifying large practice variations and high rates of empiric vancomycin use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717478/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142590819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Scott C Roberts, Trini A Mathew, Windy D Tanner, Richard A Martinello
{"title":"What can building information modeling do for you? A perspective on integration into infection prevention and control programs for patient safety.","authors":"Scott C Roberts, Trini A Mathew, Windy D Tanner, Richard A Martinello","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.179","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.179","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142576125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}