Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2024-08-29DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2397068
Marcin Masalski, Krzysztof Morawski
Objective: To develop a methodologically uniform digits-in-noise (DIN) test in 17 different languages.
Design: The DIN test was developed for Android devices as an extension to the open-access Hearing Test™ app, available on the Google Play store. It utilised professionally recorded female speech, speech-shaped noise, a digit scoring method and a variable step size. The test was adaptively optimised and evaluated as the results of tests taken online by users of the app became available.
Study sample: Optimisation using 35,534 ears, evaluation using 6012 ears.
Results: Optimisation improved the slopes of the psychometric functions for all languages by an average of 6.8%/dB. Evaluation included calculation of normative speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and estimation of test-retest standard deviations. Normative values for SRTs ranged from -14.2 dB SNR (95% CI -14.3 to -14.0) for Chinese to -11.2 dB SNR (95% CI -11.3 to -11.1) for Japanese, with reliability estimates ranging from 0.48 dB (95% CI 0.36-0.64) for Portuguese to 0.91 dB (95% CI 0.73-1.21) for Romanian.
Conclusions: The optimisation of each language version was confirmed by the improvement in the slopes of the psychometric functions. The normative values obtained from the test evaluation were in agreement with literature data.
Trial registration: Science Support Centre of Wroclaw Medical University BW-59/2020.
目标用 17 种不同的语言开发一种方法统一的噪声中数字(DIN)测试:DIN测试是为安卓设备开发的,是对谷歌Play商店中开放的Hearing Test™应用程序的扩展。它采用了专业录制的女性语音、语音噪声、数字评分法和可变步长。随着应用程序用户在线测试结果的公布,该测试进行了自适应优化和评估:研究样本:使用 35534 只耳朵进行优化,使用 6012 只耳朵进行评估:结果:优化后,所有语言的心理测量函数斜率平均提高了 6.8%/dB。评估包括计算标准语音接收阈值 (SRT) 和估计测试-再测试标准偏差。SRT 的标准值从中文的 -14.2 dB SNR(95% CI -14.3 至 -14.0)到日文的 -11.2 dB SNR(95% CI -11.3 至 -11.1)不等,可靠性估计值从葡萄牙文的 0.48 dB(95% CI 0.36 至 0.64)到罗马尼亚文的 0.91 dB(95% CI 0.73 至 1.21)不等:心理测量函数斜率的改善证实了每种语言版本的优化。从测试评估中获得的标准值与文献数据一致:试验注册:弗罗茨瓦夫医科大学科学支持中心 BW-59/2020。
{"title":"The multilingual digits-in-noise (DIN) test: development and evaluation.","authors":"Marcin Masalski, Krzysztof Morawski","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2397068","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2397068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a methodologically uniform digits-in-noise (DIN) test in 17 different languages.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The DIN test was developed for Android devices as an extension to the open-access Hearing Test<sup>™</sup> app, available on the Google Play store. It utilised professionally recorded female speech, speech-shaped noise, a digit scoring method and a variable step size. The test was adaptively optimised and evaluated as the results of tests taken online by users of the app became available.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Optimisation using 35,534 ears, evaluation using 6012 ears.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Optimisation improved the slopes of the psychometric functions for all languages by an average of 6.8%/dB. Evaluation included calculation of normative speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and estimation of test-retest standard deviations. Normative values for SRTs ranged from -14.2 dB SNR (95% CI -14.3 to -14.0) for Chinese to -11.2 dB SNR (95% CI -11.3 to -11.1) for Japanese, with reliability estimates ranging from 0.48 dB (95% CI 0.36-0.64) for Portuguese to 0.91 dB (95% CI 0.73-1.21) for Romanian.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimisation of each language version was confirmed by the improvement in the slopes of the psychometric functions. The normative values obtained from the test evaluation were in agreement with literature data.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Science Support Centre of Wroclaw Medical University BW-59/2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1193-1203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142107104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-03-15DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2025.2473050
Yağız Korkut, Mustafa Yüksel
Objectives: This study investigates the short-term effects of degraded auditory input on the right ear advantage (REA) and the REA following long-term exposure to vocoder-processed sounds, which simulate cochlear implant (CI) hearing. Vocoder processing allows normal hearing individuals to experience CI-like hearing conditions, enabling an exploration of how modifications to auditory input influence the REA.
Design: A repeated-measures design was employed. Twenty-two normal-hearing participants completed dichotic word recognition tests under three auditory conditions: bilateral normal hearing, short-term vocoder-processed hearing, and long-term vocoder-processing hearing. REA was assessed after one month of training with vocoder-processed words to simulate long-term exposure.
Study sample: The study included 22 normal-hearing participants aged 19-28 years. All participants had normal hearing and no history of auditory or neurological disorders.
Results: REA significantly decreased under the short-term vocoder condition compared to the normal hearing condition (p < 0.001). However, after long-term training, REA significantly improved (p < 0.001), and this improvement approached normal hearing levels (p = 0.28).
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that short-term exposure to vocoder-processed auditory input disrupts the REA, but extended training can restore it. These results provide insights into cortical plasticity and its role in auditory adaptation, with potential implications for developing rehabilitation strategies for CI users.
研究目的本研究调查了降级听觉输入对右耳优势(REA)的短期影响,以及长期接触声码器处理声音(模拟人工耳蜗(CI)听力)后的右耳优势。声码器处理可让听力正常的人体验到类似 CI 的听力条件,从而探索听觉输入的改变如何影响 REA:设计:采用重复测量设计。22名听力正常的参与者在三种听觉条件下完成了二分法单词识别测试:双侧正常听力、短期词汇编码器处理听力和长期词汇编码器处理听力。在进行一个月的词汇处理训练后,对 REA 进行评估,以模拟长期接触词汇处理的情况:研究包括 22 名听力正常的参与者,年龄在 19-28 岁之间。所有参与者听力正常,无听觉或神经系统疾病史:结果:与正常听力条件相比,短期声码器条件下的 REA 明显下降(p p p = 0.28):我们的研究结果表明,短期暴露于经过声码器处理的听觉输入会破坏 REA,但长时间的训练可以恢复 REA。这些结果为了解大脑皮层的可塑性及其在听觉适应中的作用提供了见解,对为人工耳蜗使用者制定康复策略具有潜在的意义。
{"title":"Right ear advantage in cochlear implant simulation: short- and long-term effects.","authors":"Yağız Korkut, Mustafa Yüksel","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2473050","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2473050","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates the short-term effects of degraded auditory input on the right ear advantage (REA) and the REA following long-term exposure to vocoder-processed sounds, which simulate cochlear implant (CI) hearing. Vocoder processing allows normal hearing individuals to experience CI-like hearing conditions, enabling an exploration of how modifications to auditory input influence the REA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A repeated-measures design was employed. Twenty-two normal-hearing participants completed dichotic word recognition tests under three auditory conditions: bilateral normal hearing, short-term vocoder-processed hearing, and long-term vocoder-processing hearing. REA was assessed after one month of training with vocoder-processed words to simulate long-term exposure.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>The study included 22 normal-hearing participants aged 19-28 years. All participants had normal hearing and no history of auditory or neurological disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>REA significantly decreased under the short-term vocoder condition compared to the normal hearing condition (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, after long-term training, REA significantly improved (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and this improvement approached normal hearing levels (<i>p</i> = 0.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that short-term exposure to vocoder-processed auditory input disrupts the REA, but extended training can restore it. These results provide insights into cortical plasticity and its role in auditory adaptation, with potential implications for developing rehabilitation strategies for CI users.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1121-1128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143634029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-03-15DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2025.2477035
Christine L Brown, Marlene Bagatto
Objective: To describe the development and implementation of a management pathway for infants and young children identified with permanent unilateral hearing loss within an early hearing detection and intervention program in Ontario, Canada.
Design: An integrated knowledge translation approach was used to synthesise knowledge and generate a product: an updated clinical practice guideline. Current unilateral hearing loss guidelines were combined with the results of a scoping literature review focusing on technology options and outcomes for children with limited usable hearing unilaterally.
Collaborators: Five paediatric audiologists partnered with two researchers to develop the knowledge product. A draft was provided to 75 audiologists who provide amplification services and was subsequently tailored to support clinical uptake by incorporating the audiologists' comments.
Results: The updated clinical practice guideline describes a care pathway for children with unilateral hearing loss. Tools and graphics were developed as part of the integrated knowledge translation approach. Following standardised, competency-based training, the co-created guideline was implemented.
Conclusions: Through an integrated knowledge translation approach, an updated unilateral hearing loss clinical practice guideline was co-created and implemented. The guideline provides information for the management of infants and young children with permanent unilateral hearing loss to support the operationalisation of current evidence-informed care.
{"title":"The development of a clinical practice guideline for the audiological management of infants and young children with permanent unilateral hearing loss using an integrated knowledge translation approach.","authors":"Christine L Brown, Marlene Bagatto","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2477035","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2477035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the development and implementation of a management pathway for infants and young children identified with permanent unilateral hearing loss within an early hearing detection and intervention program in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An integrated knowledge translation approach was used to synthesise knowledge and generate a product: an updated clinical practice guideline. Current unilateral hearing loss guidelines were combined with the results of a scoping literature review focusing on technology options and outcomes for children with limited usable hearing unilaterally.</p><p><strong>Collaborators: </strong>Five paediatric audiologists partnered with two researchers to develop the knowledge product. A draft was provided to 75 audiologists who provide amplification services and was subsequently tailored to support clinical uptake by incorporating the audiologists' comments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The updated clinical practice guideline describes a care pathway for children with unilateral hearing loss. Tools and graphics were developed as part of the integrated knowledge translation approach. Following standardised, competency-based training, the co-created guideline was implemented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through an integrated knowledge translation approach, an updated unilateral hearing loss clinical practice guideline was co-created and implemented. The guideline provides information for the management of infants and young children with permanent unilateral hearing loss to support the operationalisation of current evidence-informed care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1155-1163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143634030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-03-23DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2025.2478523
T Guyonnet-Hencke, O Portoles, M de Vries, E Koderman, A Winkler, J Goodall, P Desain, J Thielen, M Schulte, A J Beynon, M van Kesteren
Objective: The current 'gold standard' of audiometry relies on subjective behavioural responses, which is impractical and unreliable for certain groups such as children, individuals with severe disabilities, or the disabled elderly. This study aims to validating blindly a novel electroencephalography (EEG) technique to estimate audiometric thresholds quickly.
Design: Air-conduction audiometric thresholds at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, and 8000 Hz at 5 dB resolution were measured using three different systems: the novel EEG system, conventional pure-tone audiometry (PTA), and an automated behavioural test with the same stimulus properties as in the EEG test. EEG data were collected for 15 min from 32 semi-dry EEG electrodes. Later, the EEG system was trimmed to 8 electrodes and 7.5 min of data with satisfactory results. EEG and PTA thresholds were estimated blindly.
Study sample: Audiometric thresholds were estimated from 10 elderly patients with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss and five normal hearing young adults at both ears.
Results: Correlation and regression analysis validated the hearing thresholds derived from both EEG configurations relative to the behavioural hearing thresholds - Spearman's correlation of 0.78 between PTA and 8-electrode 7.5-min EEG data.
Conclusions: The results of this study open the door to rapid and objective hearing threshold estimation with EEG.
目的:目前的听力测量“黄金标准”依赖于主观行为反应,这对于某些群体,如儿童、严重残疾的个人或残疾的老年人,是不切实际和不可靠的。本研究旨在验证一种新的脑电图(EEG)技术,以快速估计听力阈值。设计:采用三种不同的系统测量5 dB分辨率下250、500、1000、2000、4000和8000hz的空气传导听力学阈值:新型脑电图系统、传统纯音听力学(PTA)和与脑电图测试具有相同刺激特性的自动行为测试。采集32个半干电极15 min的脑电数据。随后,将EEG系统精简为8个电极和7.5 min的数据,结果令人满意。盲法估计EEG和PTA阈值。研究样本:对10名老年非对称感音神经性听力损失患者和5名听力正常的年轻人的双耳听力阈值进行了估计。结果:相关分析和回归分析验证了两种EEG配置得出的听力阈值与行为听力阈值的相关性——PTA与8电极7.5 min EEG数据之间的Spearman相关系数为0.78。结论:本研究结果为脑电图快速客观估计听阈打开了大门。
{"title":"Rapid cortical auditory evoked potentials audiometry.","authors":"T Guyonnet-Hencke, O Portoles, M de Vries, E Koderman, A Winkler, J Goodall, P Desain, J Thielen, M Schulte, A J Beynon, M van Kesteren","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2478523","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2478523","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current 'gold standard' of audiometry relies on subjective behavioural responses, which is impractical and unreliable for certain groups such as children, individuals with severe disabilities, or the disabled elderly. This study aims to validating blindly a novel electroencephalography (EEG) technique to estimate audiometric thresholds quickly.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Air-conduction audiometric thresholds at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, and 8000 Hz at 5 dB resolution were measured using three different systems: the novel EEG system, conventional pure-tone audiometry (PTA), and an automated behavioural test with the same stimulus properties as in the EEG test. EEG data were collected for 15 min from 32 semi-dry EEG electrodes. Later, the EEG system was trimmed to 8 electrodes and 7.5 min of data with satisfactory results. EEG and PTA thresholds were estimated blindly.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Audiometric thresholds were estimated from 10 elderly patients with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss and five normal hearing young adults at both ears.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlation and regression analysis validated the hearing thresholds derived from both EEG configurations relative to the behavioural hearing thresholds - Spearman's correlation of 0.78 between PTA and 8-electrode 7.5-min EEG data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study open the door to rapid and objective hearing threshold estimation with EEG.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1182-1192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143691947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-31DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2025.2577704
Nethra R Kumar, Geetha Chinnaraj, Saransh Jain
Objectives: This systematic review examines spectro-temporal resolution ability in children with cochlear implants (cCI). The objective is to summarise the articles that assess the spectro-temporal resolution ability, its relationship with speech perception, and associated factors in cCI.
Design: A systematic review.
Study sample: A total of 193 articles were reviewed, and seven articles were selected for the systematic review that assessed spectro-temporal resolution ability in cCI. All seven studies used the Spectro-Temporal Modulated Ripple Test (SMRT) to assess spectro-temporal resolution ability.
Results: The results consistently showed that cCI demonstrated lower SMRT thresholds than children with normal hearing. A significant correlation was found between SMRT thresholds and speech perception scores. Factors associated with spectro-temporal resolution included chronological age, age at implantation, duration of implantation, cognitive ability, and the effect of training.
Conclusion: SMRT can be used to assess young children, as it shows a significant correlation with speech perception scores. Even though the results of SMRT thresholds and their correlation with speech perception were consistent, variations in the results were present across studies, which may have been due to demographic and technological factors.
{"title":"Spectro-temporal resolution abilities in children with cochlear implants: a systematic review.","authors":"Nethra R Kumar, Geetha Chinnaraj, Saransh Jain","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2577704","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2025.2577704","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review examines spectro-temporal resolution ability in children with cochlear implants (cCI). The objective is to summarise the articles that assess the spectro-temporal resolution ability, its relationship with speech perception, and associated factors in cCI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>A total of 193 articles were reviewed, and seven articles were selected for the systematic review that assessed spectro-temporal resolution ability in cCI. All seven studies used the Spectro-Temporal Modulated Ripple Test (SMRT) to assess spectro-temporal resolution ability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results consistently showed that cCI demonstrated lower SMRT thresholds than children with normal hearing. A significant correlation was found between SMRT thresholds and speech perception scores. Factors associated with spectro-temporal resolution included chronological age, age at implantation, duration of implantation, cognitive ability, and the effect of training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SMRT can be used to assess young children, as it shows a significant correlation with speech perception scores. Even though the results of SMRT thresholds and their correlation with speech perception were consistent, variations in the results were present across studies, which may have been due to demographic and technological factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145421256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-25DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2025.2573030
Lucinda Kootstra, Marian B A Rodenburg-Vlot, Marc P van der Schroeff, Jantien L Vroegop
Objective: In this study we investigated whether speech recognition in noise improves with age in children with hearing loss using hearing aids (HA) or cochlear implants (CI). Secondly, we identified the audiological factors that predict these abilities.
Design: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Dutch Digit-In-Noise (DIN) test results from our clinical population of children rehabilitated with HAs (N = 163) or CIs (N = 83). Participants were aged between 6 and 18 years, had stable hearing loss and an open-set phoneme recognition in quiet > 50% at 65 dB SPL.
Study sample: We included 242 measurements from HA users and 190 from CI users. All had at least 1 year of device experience and were using their daily program.
Results: Two linear mixed models were created for HA and CI users. A significant effect of age on speech in noise performance was observed for both groups. For HA users, pure tone average was another significant predictor, for CI users = the modality. Children with bilateral CIs had a significantly better DIN SRT compared to those with unilateral or bimodal rehabilitation.
Conclusions: Age and audiological factors, such as pure tone average and modality, significantly predict speech-in-noise performance in children using HAs or CIs.
{"title":"Exploring age-dependent speech recognition in noise for children with hearing loss: insights from hearing Aid or cochlear Implant rehabilitation.","authors":"Lucinda Kootstra, Marian B A Rodenburg-Vlot, Marc P van der Schroeff, Jantien L Vroegop","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2573030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2025.2573030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study we investigated whether speech recognition in noise improves with age in children with hearing loss using hearing aids (HA) or cochlear implants (CI). Secondly, we identified the audiological factors that predict these abilities.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of the Dutch Digit-In-Noise (DIN) test results from our clinical population of children rehabilitated with HAs (N = 163) or CIs (N = 83). Participants were aged between 6 and 18 years, had stable hearing loss and an open-set phoneme recognition in quiet > 50% at 65 dB SPL.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>We included 242 measurements from HA users and 190 from CI users. All had at least 1 year of device experience and were using their daily program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two linear mixed models were created for HA and CI users. A significant effect of age on speech in noise performance was observed for both groups. For HA users, pure tone average was another significant predictor, for CI users = the modality. Children with bilateral CIs had a significantly better DIN SRT compared to those with unilateral or bimodal rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age and audiological factors, such as pure tone average and modality, significantly predict speech-in-noise performance in children using HAs or CIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145370322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Conduct a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) to identify interventions related to the diagnosis and management of SSNHL. Results from this review will inform the development of the World Health Organisation (WHO) Package for Ear and Hearing Care Interventions (PEHCI).
Design: We searched for clinical practice guidelines, published from 2014 onwards, across four databases and websites for audiology/otolaryngology professional organisations, that report recommendations on diagnosis and management of SSNHL. We assessed the quality of the clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II tool. All review processes were performed by two independent reviewers.
Sample: Following the screening and quality appraisal, we identified three high-quality clinical practice guidelines relevant to SSNHL.
Results: Specific interventions focused on the (1) diagnosis of SSNHL with clinical tests, (2) management of SSNHL with patient education, medical management with steroid use with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (when warranted), and (3) follow-up in terms of outcomes assessment with clinical tests and accompanied by rehabilitation when warranted.
Conclusions: The clinical practice guidelines detailed recommendations on the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients with SSNHL. The interventions derived from these guidelines will inform the selection of interventions for inclusion in the WHO PEHCI.
{"title":"Interventions for sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review and quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines.","authors":"Lauren K Dillard, Pallavi Mishra, Carolina Der, Mohamed Elrakhawy, Ashok Jagasia, Shelly Chadha","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2571797","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2571797","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Conduct a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) to identify interventions related to the diagnosis and management of SSNHL. Results from this review will inform the development of the World Health Organisation (WHO) Package for Ear and Hearing Care Interventions (PEHCI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We searched for clinical practice guidelines, published from 2014 onwards, across four databases and websites for audiology/otolaryngology professional organisations, that report recommendations on diagnosis and management of SSNHL. We assessed the quality of the clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II tool. All review processes were performed by two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>Following the screening and quality appraisal, we identified three high-quality clinical practice guidelines relevant to SSNHL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Specific interventions focused on the (1) diagnosis of SSNHL with clinical tests, (2) management of SSNHL with patient education, medical management with steroid use with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (when warranted), and (3) follow-up in terms of outcomes assessment with clinical tests and accompanied by rehabilitation when warranted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical practice guidelines detailed recommendations on the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients with SSNHL. The interventions derived from these guidelines will inform the selection of interventions for inclusion in the WHO PEHCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145370258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2025.2569927
Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi, Catherine Killan, Sara Rafiee, Derek J Hoare, Nicola Wray, Paul Bateman
Objective: To assess the validity, reliability and readability of four AI chatbots for hearing-health information.
Design and study sample: Three audiologists created 100 questions covering adult hearing loss, paediatric hearing, hearing aids, tinnitus and cochlear implants (20 each). Questions were submitted twice to ChatGPT-3.5, Bing AI, Gemini and Perplexity. Answers were scored for factual accuracy and completeness on a five-point Global Quality Score. Validity was defined using low (score = 5) and high (score ≥ 4) thresholds. Internal consistency was estimated with Cronbach's α; readability with the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). All scoring was completed independently by two blinded reviewers; discrepancies were resolved by consensus.
Results: Under the low threshold ChatGPT-3.5 and Perplexity were most valid (84% and 79%); high-threshold validity fell to 37% and 34%. Perplexity had the highest overall reliability (α = 0.83) yet α dropped below 0.70 for cochlear-implant, tinnitus and hearing-aid questions. 84% percent of outputs were "Difficult"/"Very Difficult" and 68% read at college level.
Conclusions: AI chatbots deliver generally accurate hearing-health content, but high-threshold accuracy, domain-specific reliability and readability remain suboptimal. They should supplement, not replace the professional counselling. Continued optimisation and external validation are needed before routine clinical recommendation.
{"title":"Validity, reliability, and readability of Artificial Intelligence chatbots as public sources of information on hearing loss: a comparative evaluation of ChatGPT, Bing, Gemini, and Perplexity.","authors":"Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi, Catherine Killan, Sara Rafiee, Derek J Hoare, Nicola Wray, Paul Bateman","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2569927","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2569927","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the validity, reliability and readability of four AI chatbots for hearing-health information.</p><p><strong>Design and study sample: </strong>Three audiologists created 100 questions covering adult hearing loss, paediatric hearing, hearing aids, tinnitus and cochlear implants (20 each). Questions were submitted twice to ChatGPT-3.5, Bing AI, Gemini and Perplexity. Answers were scored for factual accuracy and completeness on a five-point Global Quality Score. Validity was defined using low (score = 5) and high (score ≥ 4) thresholds. Internal consistency was estimated with Cronbach's α; readability with the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). All scoring was completed independently by two blinded reviewers; discrepancies were resolved by consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under the low threshold ChatGPT-3.5 and Perplexity were most valid (84% and 79%); high-threshold validity fell to 37% and 34%. Perplexity had the highest overall reliability (α = 0.83) yet α dropped below 0.70 for cochlear-implant, tinnitus and hearing-aid questions. 84% percent of outputs were \"Difficult\"/\"Very Difficult\" and 68% read at college level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI chatbots deliver generally accurate hearing-health content, but high-threshold accuracy, domain-specific reliability and readability remain suboptimal. They should supplement, not replace the professional counselling. Continued optimisation and external validation are needed before routine clinical recommendation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145354622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-15DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2025.2573033
Helen Gurteen, Melinda Toomey, Lana Wilson, Bronwyn Franco, Yuanyuan Gu, Chyrisse Heine, Sabrina Lenzen, Piers Dawes
Objective: This study investigated the impact of cognitive function on the administration of the hearTest automated hearing test in older adults. The relationship between Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score and three hearTest metrics (false response rate, standard deviation of response time, and test duration) was analysed.
Design: A cross-sectional correlational design was used. Testing was conducted in participants' homes or retirement villages.
Study sample: One hundred and five older adults (aged 67-97 years) receiving home-based aged care with MoCA scores ranging between 5 (possible dementia) and 30 (healthy cognition).
Results: There was no relationship between MoCA score and false response rate (r = -0.12, CI = -0.42 to 0.06, p = 0.22) or standard deviation of response time (r = -0.11, CI = -0.33 to 0.04, p = 0.27). There was a moderate sized correlation between MoCA score and test duration (r = -0.31, CI = - 0.49 to - 0.15, p = 0.001), indicating longer test duration with lower MoCA scores.
Conclusions: hearTest performance is not impacted by cognitive ability in a population of older adults that included people living with dementia. However, additional test time may be needed for hearTest administration for individuals with cognitive impairment.
目的:本研究探讨认知功能对老年人使用心脏测试自动听力测试的影响。分析蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评分与三项心脏测试指标(假反应率、反应时间标准差和测试持续时间)的关系。设计:采用横断面相关设计。测试在参与者的家中或退休村进行。研究样本:105名老年人(67-97岁)接受以家庭为基础的老年护理,MoCA评分在5分(可能的痴呆)到30分(健康认知)之间。结果:MoCA评分与假反应率(r = -0.12, CI = -0.42 ~ 0.06, p = 0.22)、反应时间标准差(r = -0.11, CI = -0.33 ~ 0.04, p = 0.27)无相关性。MoCA评分与测试持续时间之间存在中等程度的相关性(r = -0.31, CI = - 0.49至- 0.15,p = 0.001),表明测试持续时间越长,MoCA评分越低。结论:在包括痴呆症患者在内的老年人中,心脏测试结果不受认知能力的影响。然而,对于有认知障碍的个体,可能需要额外的测试时间。
{"title":"The impact of cognition on hearTest administration in older adults receiving home care.","authors":"Helen Gurteen, Melinda Toomey, Lana Wilson, Bronwyn Franco, Yuanyuan Gu, Chyrisse Heine, Sabrina Lenzen, Piers Dawes","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2573033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2025.2573033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the impact of cognitive function on the administration of the hearTest automated hearing test in older adults. The relationship between Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score and three hearTest metrics (false response rate, standard deviation of response time, and test duration) was analysed.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional correlational design was used. Testing was conducted in participants' homes or retirement villages.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>One hundred and five older adults (aged 67-97 years) receiving home-based aged care with MoCA scores ranging between 5 (possible dementia) and 30 (healthy cognition).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no relationship between MoCA score and false response rate (<i>r</i> = -0.12, CI = -0.42 to 0.06, <i>p</i> = 0.22) or standard deviation of response time (<i>r</i> = -0.11, CI = -0.33 to 0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.27). There was a moderate sized correlation between MoCA score and test duration (<i>r</i> = -0.31, CI = - 0.49 to - 0.15, <i>p</i> = 0.001), indicating longer test duration with lower MoCA scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>hearTest performance is not impacted by cognitive ability in a population of older adults that included people living with dementia. However, additional test time may be needed for hearTest administration for individuals with cognitive impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145299999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}