International Journal of Audiology最新文献

Objective: This study aimed to gather opinions and establish consensus among audiologists and patients on supporting individuals with mental health concerns in audiology settings.

Design: Utilising a modified electronic Delphi survey, a panel of 25 experts engaged in three rounds of data collection over 12 weeks. Participants provided open-text responses in Round 1 describing "clinical practices that can be employed to support to patients presenting with mental health concerns", and the research team combined these with relevant clinical practices from literature searches. In subsequent rounds, panellists then rated their level of agreement with the combined list of statements; individually (Round 2) and again after seeing the panel's collated responses (Round 3).

Study sample: Panel experts included 11 patients (adults with hearing loss; M_age 73.8 years) and 14 audiologists (with M 11.8 years of experience working in audiology).

Results: Consensus was met for 123 items categorised into: Detection, Education, Effective Communication, Provision of Emotional Support, Personal Qualities and Attitudes of the Audiologist, Interventions, Connecting the Patient to Additional Support Services, Normal Processes that are Especially Important in these Cases, and Organisational Considerations.

Conclusions: The study highlights the diversity of approaches audiologists can employ to support patients with mental health concerns.

Objective: To explore the value of anonymous patient feedback for audiology students, examining alignment between student and patient judgments on communication skills and assessing how students utilise the feedback.

Design: This study utilised a mixed methods design, employing a Likert survey to collect patient and student ratings on professionalism, compassion, and listening and talking skills in clinical encounters. Semi-structured interviews investigated the student perspective of receiving patient feedback.

Study sample: 13 Audiology students and 31 patients who were placed at, or received care at an Audiology teaching clinic.

Results: Patients' ratings across all measures were higher on average when compared to students' self-ratings, only correlating significantly for the measure concerning students' talking skills. Five themes and one subtheme were identified: Emotional impacts, A worthwhile experience, Contrasting priorities, Patients retake centre stage, and Self-reflective learners (subtheme Self-doubt).

Conclusions: This study reveals that patient feedback led student Audiologists to report heightened seriousness in their interactions and increased attention on skills vital for patient-centred care. The process boosted students' confidence and reinforced awareness of the patient's perspective. Further research is needed to gauge the extent of these effects and explore the feasibility of implementing a large-scale patient feedback program in audiology training settings.

Objective: To evaluate a novel user-operated audiometry method allowing users full control in determining their pure-tone hearing thresholds.

Design: Comparative study. Participants were recruited from a hearing clinic after undergoing manual audiometry (six frequencies). They then performed test-retests of a new test (slider audiometry, eight frequencies) and completed the System Usability Scale questionnaire.

Study sample: 37 adult participants, including 30 hearing-impaired and seven normal-hearing individuals.

Results: Mean (SD) threshold differences for octave frequencies between 250 to 2000 Hz between manual and slider audiometry ranged from -7.8 (6.6) to -5.7 (6.5) dB and were significant. For 4000 and 8000 Hz mean differences were -0.3 (8.4) and 0.0 (9.7) dB and insignificant. Standard deviations ranged from 6.5 to 9.7 dB across six tested frequencies. Slider test-retest mean threshold differences ranged from -1.4 (4.7) to 0.3 (6.0) dB across eight tested frequencies, with standard deviations ranging from 4.1 to 8.5 dB. The average usability score for the slider audiometry was 88.3.

Conclusion: When compared to manual audiometry, the slider audiometry demonstrated validity at 4000 and 8000 Hz but found significantly lower thresholds for octave frequencies between 250 to 2000 Hz. Test-retests of the new method revealed small mean differences and acceptable SDs.

Objective: The goal of this study was to determine open field stapedius reflex thresholds (oSRTs) in CI patients with fittings based on subjective loudness ratings. A further objective was to compare these oSRTs and those of eSRT-based fittings that are similar to the oSRTs of normal hearing.

Design: Impedance measurements of the ear drum were taken while subjects were wearing their audio processors. The stapedius reflex was elicited by electrical stimulation transmitted through the activated CI system in response to an acoustic stimulus presented in the free sound field.

Study sample: Subjects were 50 experienced CI users (n = 57 ears) with CI fittings based on subjective loudness scaling.

Results: A reference range for the oSRTs was defined that was identified in CI patients with eSRT-based fittings. Sound levels for stapedius reflex detection were inside the reference target range in 70% of the cases, below the reference range (i.e. down to 40 dB HL) in 20% of the cases, and above the reference range in 10% of the cases.

Conclusion: Stapedius reflex detection in a free sound field may help detect fittings with too high or too low stimulation levels that might reduce audiological performance.

Objective: Describe the ear and hearing outcomes in Aboriginal infants in an Australian urban area.

Design: Aboriginal infants enrolled in the Djaalinj Waakinj prospective cohort study had ear health screenings at ages 2-4, 6-8 and 12-18 months and audiological assessment at ∼12 months of age. Sociodemographic, environmental characteristics, otoscopy, otoacoustic emissions, tympanometry and visual reinforcement audiometry data were collected.

Study sample: 125 infants were enrolled in the study; 67 completed audiological assessment, 62, 54, and 58 of whom attended ear screenings at 2-4, 6-8 and 12-18 months.

Results: Of the children that attended the audiological assessment, 36.5%, 50% and 64.3% of infants had otitis media (OM) at 2-4, 6-8 and 12-18 months. Using a 10 dB correction factor, 44.8% of infants had hearing loss (HL) (≥ 25 dB HL) at ∼ 12 months of age. More males (X²=5.4 (1df, p = 0.02)) and infants with OM at audiological assessment (X²=5.8 (1df, p = 0.02)) had HL. More infants that used a pacifier at 12-18 months of age had HL (X²=4.7 (1df, p = 0.03)).

Conclusion: Aboriginal infants in an urban area have high rates of HL and OM, which requires early surveillance and timely treatment to reduce the medical and developmental impacts of OM and HL.