International Journal of Audiology最新文献

Objective: Our objective was to ascertain likely reasons for explaining variation in coverage rates for hearing aids (HAs) among various countries around the world.

Design: A retrospective analysis of past coverage rates and their association to demographic and economic variables of apriori logical consideration.

Study sample: Data was obtained on macroeconomic conditions from 37 countries in the OECD and estimated coverage rates for HAs using recent actual sales data.

Results: Two variables were identified with a very strong correlation (R = 0.97, R² = 0.95) to coverage rates. The first variable was the level of subsidy provided for the citizens to obtain HAs. The second variable was the GNI/capita which reflects the income available to citizens to make the purchase of HAs.

Conclusion: In countries where subsidy for HAs are made available through either public or private health service/insurance, an increase in coverage rates is likely to occur. The effect of subsidy is likely to surpass any effect of OTC HAs that has been demonstrated to date. Where and when feasible, subsidy presence and encouraging income generation among able citizens of a country should be sought in tandem - a complex interplay of improving coverage rates for HAs with economics.

Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the evidence about the prevalence of permanent hearing loss for children not identified from newborn hearing screening (NHS).

Design: Articles were grouped into three categories based on the methodological approach: (1) all participants received diagnostic testing, (2) otoacoustic emission (OAE) or pure tone screening was completed and those not passing were referred for a diagnostic test, and (3) data were retrieved from archival records. Study characteristics, prevalence, and contextual factors were synthesised and narratively described.

Study sample: 30 peer-reviewed articles.

Results: Prevalence of permanent hearing loss per 1,000 children ranged from 0.32 to 77.87 (M = 7.30; SD = 16.87). Variations in the criteria for inclusion contributed to prevalence differences. Prevalence was higher when unilateral and milder degrees of hearing loss were included, and older children had higher prevalence (M = 13.71; SD = 23.21) than younger children (M = 1.57; SD = 0.86).

Conclusion: There is scant research on prevalence of childhood hearing loss after NHS that utilised methods to accurately differentiate between permanent and temporary hearing loss. Rigorous research is needed on the prevalence of permanent childhood hearing loss to inform strategies for monitoring, identification, intervention, and management.

Objective: This study evaluated the diagnostic performances of a tablet-based hearing screening test by assisted-test and self-test modes.

Design/method: Measurements were performed with the SoTone tests in normal hearing and hearing-impaired adult participants using an Android tablet and calibrated Bluetooth headphones. The duration of assisted- and self-test modes were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted after calculations of sensitivity and specificity at 20, 30, and 35 dB HL cut-off values.

Study sample: 217 participants performed the tests. The effect of test mode (assisted versus self) was compared in a sample of 103 participants.

Results: Self-test duration (89 s) was significantly longer than the assisted-test duration (75 s) (p = 0.003, Wilcoxon test). For the 20, 30, and 35 dB HL cut-off values, sensitivity was between 92% and 96%, and specificity was between 79 and 90%. Concordance of results between assisted-test and self-test modes was excellent (Cohen's kappa = 0.81, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The SoTone hearing screening test is accurate for identifying the presence of a suspected hearing loss at 20 dB HL or more in adults. It can be used either in assisted-test or self-test modes.

Objective: This study assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychosocial health among individuals with different levels of hearing ability.

Design: For this cross-sectional study, adults completed an online digits-in-noise test and survey. Participants were categorised into "good", "insufficient", or "poor" hearing groups. Survey questions included topics on depression, anxiety, distress, somatisation, and loneliness levels. Multiple logistic, linear, and negative binomial regressions examined differences in psychosocial health between hearing groups. Moderation analyses identified vulnerable subgroups. Mediation analyses examined mediating effects of pandemic measures on hearing ability and psychosocial health.

Study sample: Eight-hundred and sixty-five adults with or without hearing impairment.

Results: Individuals with poor hearing had a higher odds of having elevated anxiety levels and had higher somatisation levels compared to participants with good hearing. Chronic diseases significantly moderated the relationship between poor hearing ability and loneliness. Difficulties with communicating through facemasks, 1.5 m distance, plastic screens, and during video calls significantly mediated the relationships between hearing ability, anxiety and somatisation.

Conclusions: Results highlight the elevated anxiety and somatisation levels experienced among individuals with hearing impairment during the COVID-19 pandemic. More awareness is needed of the negative impact pandemic measures can have on psychosocial health during future health crises.

Objective: To assess the utility of targeted surveillance for the identification of moderate to profound PCHI in babies who pass newborn hearing screening in England and have risk factors.

Design: Retrospective analysis.

Study sample: A total of 3,957,891 children born 01/04/2012-31/03/2018 in England.

Results: A total of 7148 PCHI cases were identified (1.81 per 1,000 babies). 6,707 followed an immediate referral from the screen (1 per 16 referrals), 51 followed targeted surveillance referral (1 per 540 referrals) and 390 without a referral. Audiology uptake was higher following an immediate referral (96.7% overall, 77.2% within NHSP-defined timescales) than following targeted surveillance (63.8% overall, 51.1% within 52 weeks of birth). The screening was 94.5% sensitive overall, with similar sensitivities for each of the risk factors. General linearised logistic regression models identified syndrome as the risk factor with the highest odds ratio (14.08 for all babies, 22.19 for babies without immediate referral). Close family history of hearing loss was the next highest (10.93 for all babies, 12.29 for babies without immediate referral).

Conclusion: The evidence for a targeted surveillance programme, based on risk factors, for babies in England who pass the newborn screen is not strong.

Objective: In automated hearing threshold determination procedures, prespecified response- time limits can be applied to evaluate whether a stimulus was truly heard by checking whether the test subject reacts to the onset and the offset of the stimuli within given time intervals. The influence of different response-time limits on the threshold of normal-hearing test subjects was investigated.

Design: Two-stage hearing threshold level measurements applying the ISO 8253-1 (2010) bracketing procedure were performed. Pre-tests at 125 Hz and 1000 Hz were carried out with maximum accepted response times of 600 ms, 1000 ms, and 1200 ms. Subsequently, thresholds were measured at the seven octaves between 125 Hz and 8000 Hz with maximum accepted response times of 600 ms and 1000 ms.

Study sample: 15 test subjects in pre-tests, 25 test subjects in the main study.

Results: Threshold levels determined with a maximum accepted response time of 1000 ms are 2.6 dB lower than those obtained with a maximum accepted response time of 600 ms (95% CI -1.6 dB to 6.9 dB). The threshold shift was similar at all frequencies.

Conclusions: Based on this study, response-time limits after both stimulus onset and offset of at least 1000 ms are recommended.

Objective: To validate measurement of predicted earmold wideband real-ear-to-coupler difference (wRECD) using an integrated pressure level (IPL) calibrated transducer and the incorporation of an acoustically measured tubing length correction.

Design: Unilateral earmold SPL wRECD using varied hearing aid tubing length and the proposed predicted earmold IPL wRECD measurement procedure were completed on all participants and compared.

Study sample: 22 normal hearing adults with normal middle ear status were recruited.

Results: There were no clinically significant differences between probe-microphone and predicted earmold IPL wRECD measurements between 500 and 2500 Hz. Above 5000 Hz, the predicted earmold IPL wRECD exceeded earmold SPL wRECDs due to lack of standing wave interference. Test-retest reliability of IPL wRECD measurement exceeded the reliability of earmold SPL wRECD measurement across all assessed frequencies, with the greatest improvements in the high frequencies. The acoustically measured tubing length correction largely accounted for acoustic effects of the participant's earmold.

Conclusions: IPL-based measurements provide a promising alternative to probe-microphone earmold wRECD procedures. Predicted earmold IPL wRECD is measured without probe-microphone placement, agrees well with earmold SPL wRECDs and is expected to extend the valid bandwidth of wRECD measurement.

Objective: Automated pure-tone audiometry is frequently used in teleaudiology and hearing screening. Given the high prevalence of age-related hearing loss, older adults are an important target population. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of automated audiometry in older adults, and to examine the influence of test frequency, age, sex, hearing and cognitive status.

Design and study sample: In a population-based study, two age-homogeneous samples of 70-year-olds (n = 238) and 85-year-olds (n = 114) were tested with automated audiometry in an office using circum-aural headphones and, around 4 weeks later, with manual audiometry conducted to clinical standards. The differences were analysed for individual frequencies (range: 0.25-8 kHz) and pure-tone averages.

Results: The mean difference varied across test frequencies and age groups, the overall figure being -0.7 dB (SD = 8.8, p < 0.001), and 68% to 94% of automated thresholds corresponded within ±10 dB of manual thresholds. The poorest accuracy was found at 8 kHz. Age, sex, hearing and cognitive status were not associated with the accuracy (ordinal regression analysis).

Conclusions: Automated audiometry seems to produce accurate assessments of hearing sensitivity in the majority of older adults, but with larger error margins than in younger populations, and is not affected by relevant patient factors associated with old age.

Objective: The study investigated the relationship between the strength of the medial olivocochlear reflex (measured via contralateral inhibition of otoacoustic emissions) and speech perception in noise (obtained from behavioural identification task) through meta-analyses.

Design: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of studies investigating the relationship in neurotypical adults was performed.

Study sample: The systematic search (in PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct and Google Scholar databases) revealed 21 eligible studies, which were critically appraised using the NIH tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Meta-analysis was performed on 17 studies (374 participants) with fair to good quality.

Results: The results revealed that the medial olivocochlear reflex accounts for less than 1% of the variations in speech perception in noise in neurotypical individuals. Sub-group analyses conducted to address a few methodological differences also revealed no discernible association between the two variables.

Conclusions: The results reveal no modulatory effect of the medial olivocochlear reflex assessed using contralateral inhibition of otoacoustic emission on the ability to perceive speech in noise. However, more data utilising alternative measures of medial olivocochlear reflex strength is necessary before drawing any conclusions about the role of the medial olivocochlear bundle in speech perception in noise.

Objective: The variability in outcomes among adult cochlear implant (CI) users poses challenges for clinicians in accurately predicting the benefits of the implant for individual candidates. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and confidence of clinicians in predicting speech perception outcomes for adult CI users one-year post-implantation.

Design: Participants were presented with comprehensive information on pre-implantation, one-month post-implantation, and six-month post-implantation data for 10 case studies. The cases encompassed a range of one-year post-implantation phoneme scores, from low performers (27%) to high performers (92%). Participants were tasked with predicting the speech perception outcomes for these cases one year after implantation.

Study sample: Forty-one clinicians completed the full outcome prediction survey.

Results: Our findings revealed a significant over-prediction of low performance by clinicians. Interestingly, clinicians tended to predict average performance (73-76% phoneme score) even when provided with information suggesting lower-than-average performance. Most clinicians expressed confidence in their predictions, irrespective of their accuracy.

Conclusions: Identifying signs of low performance, particularly in the early post-implantation period, can enable clinicians to implement early interventions. Further research into accurate outcome prediction is essential for managing expectations, providing counselling, increasing CI adoption, and optimising clinical care for both high and low performers.