首页 > 最新文献

International Journal of Audiology最新文献

英文 中文
Masseter and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in individuals with auditory neuropathy. 听觉神经病患者的颌下肌和颈前庭诱发肌源性电位
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2399788
R Kalaiyarasan,Sujeet Kumar Sinha
OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to explore the functional integrity of vestibulo-masseteric and sacculo-collic reflex pathways in individuals with Auditory Neuropathy (AN). The study also aimed at finding the correlation between mVEMP and cVEMP response parameters for AN and healthy individuals.DESIGNStandard group comparison research design.STUDY SAMPLEIndividuals with AN (n = 20); age-gender matched healthy individuals (n = 20) were recruited. Each participant underwent routine audiological evaluation; mVEMP and cVEMP testing. mVEMP and cVEMP were recorded using 500 Hz tone burst stimulus for all the participants.RESULTSMost of the AN individuals had no mVEMP (ipsilateral & contralateral - 60%; bilateral - 50%) and cVEMP (60%) responses. There was no significant association (p > 0.05) between the duration of AN with mVEMP and cVEMP findings. However, a significant correlation (p < 0.05) was found for EMG rectified amplitude of mVEMP and cVEMP in AN.CONCLUSIONThe results of this study suggested an impaired function of the vestibulomassteric and sacculocollic reflex pathways in individuals with AN. Vestibular evaluation should be included as a part of the regular test battery for individuals with AN.
目的本研究旨在探讨听觉神经病(AN)患者的前庭-体表和骶尾部-卷积反射通路的功能完整性。该研究还旨在发现听觉神经病患者和健康人的 mVEMP 和 cVEMP 反应参数之间的相关性。结果大多数 AN 患者没有 mVEMP(同侧和对侧 - 60%;双侧 - 50%)和 cVEMP(60%)反应。自闭症持续时间与 mVEMP 和 cVEMP 结果之间没有明显关联(p > 0.05)。结论:本研究结果表明,AN 患者的前庭马斯特和骶尾部反射通路功能受损。前庭评估应作为AN患者常规测试的一部分。
{"title":"Masseter and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in individuals with auditory neuropathy.","authors":"R Kalaiyarasan,Sujeet Kumar Sinha","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2399788","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2399788","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to explore the functional integrity of vestibulo-masseteric and sacculo-collic reflex pathways in individuals with Auditory Neuropathy (AN). The study also aimed at finding the correlation between mVEMP and cVEMP response parameters for AN and healthy individuals.DESIGNStandard group comparison research design.STUDY SAMPLEIndividuals with AN (n = 20); age-gender matched healthy individuals (n = 20) were recruited. Each participant underwent routine audiological evaluation; mVEMP and cVEMP testing. mVEMP and cVEMP were recorded using 500 Hz tone burst stimulus for all the participants.RESULTSMost of the AN individuals had no mVEMP (ipsilateral & contralateral - 60%; bilateral - 50%) and cVEMP (60%) responses. There was no significant association (p > 0.05) between the duration of AN with mVEMP and cVEMP findings. However, a significant correlation (p < 0.05) was found for EMG rectified amplitude of mVEMP and cVEMP in AN.CONCLUSIONThe results of this study suggested an impaired function of the vestibulomassteric and sacculocollic reflex pathways in individuals with AN. Vestibular evaluation should be included as a part of the regular test battery for individuals with AN.","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142192429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Microphone calibration estimation for mobile audiological tests with resonating bottles. 使用共振瓶进行移动听力测试的麦克风校准估算。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2395416
Maximilian Karl Scharf,Rainer Huber,Michael Schulte,Birger Kollmeier
OBJECTIVEAudiological tests on smartphones require consistent microphone recordings across device types with a reasonable standard uncertainty (2-3 Decibel (dB)) of the sound pressure level at the microphone. However, the calibration of smartphone microphones by the non-expert user is still an unsolved issue. We show that whistling on standardized glass bottles permits a coarse sound level calibration with an uncertainty that is smaller than the standard uncertainty of clinical audiograms (4.9dB) and enough for mobile health (mHealth) products.DESIGNWe define and test a calibration procedure with bottle-whistles for smartphones. The empirical sound pressure levels are used to calculate the mean and standard deviation of a single measurement.STUDY SAMPLETwo uncalibrated studies with a total of 30 participants, one calibrated study with 11 participants.RESULTSThe mean maximal sound pressure level of 330 ml Vichy-shape bottle-whistles at 50 cm distance is 92.8 ± 1.6dB sound pressure level (SPL). The sound pressure level variation of a single measurement is 3.0dB SPL.CONCLUSIONSIn comparison to other possible ways of level calibration estimates for smartphones (e.g. level of own voice, level of common environmental sounds), the current method appears to be robust in background noise and easily reproducible with glass bottles of defined dimensions.
目标智能手机的听力测试要求不同设备类型的传声器记录一致,传声器处的声压级具有合理的标准不确定性(2-3 分贝 (dB))。然而,非专业用户对智能手机麦克风的校准仍是一个尚未解决的问题。我们的研究表明,在标准化玻璃瓶上吹口哨可以实现粗声级校准,其不确定性小于临床听力图的标准不确定性(4.9 分贝),足以用于移动健康(mHealth)产品。结果330 毫升 Vichy 形瓶哨在 50 厘米距离内的平均最大声压级为 92.8 ± 1.6 分贝声压级 (SPL)。结论与其他可能的智能手机声级校准估算方法(如自己的声音声级、常见环境声音声级)相比,目前的方法似乎在背景噪声中很稳健,并且在使用规定尺寸的玻璃瓶时很容易再现。
{"title":"Microphone calibration estimation for mobile audiological tests with resonating bottles.","authors":"Maximilian Karl Scharf,Rainer Huber,Michael Schulte,Birger Kollmeier","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2395416","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2395416","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVEAudiological tests on smartphones require consistent microphone recordings across device types with a reasonable standard uncertainty (2-3 Decibel (dB)) of the sound pressure level at the microphone. However, the calibration of smartphone microphones by the non-expert user is still an unsolved issue. We show that whistling on standardized glass bottles permits a coarse sound level calibration with an uncertainty that is smaller than the standard uncertainty of clinical audiograms (4.9dB) and enough for mobile health (mHealth) products.DESIGNWe define and test a calibration procedure with bottle-whistles for smartphones. The empirical sound pressure levels are used to calculate the mean and standard deviation of a single measurement.STUDY SAMPLETwo uncalibrated studies with a total of 30 participants, one calibrated study with 11 participants.RESULTSThe mean maximal sound pressure level of 330 ml Vichy-shape bottle-whistles at 50 cm distance is 92.8 ± 1.6dB sound pressure level (SPL). The sound pressure level variation of a single measurement is 3.0dB SPL.CONCLUSIONSIn comparison to other possible ways of level calibration estimates for smartphones (e.g. level of own voice, level of common environmental sounds), the current method appears to be robust in background noise and easily reproducible with glass bottles of defined dimensions.","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":"39 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142192431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Developing effective communication skills in audiology using anonymous patient feedback. 利用匿名患者反馈,培养听力学方面的有效沟通技巧。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2399180
Patrick Bowers, Kelley Graydon

Objective: To explore the value of anonymous patient feedback for audiology students, examining alignment between student and patient judgments on communication skills and assessing how students utilise the feedback.

Design: This study utilised a mixed methods design, employing a Likert survey to collect patient and student ratings on professionalism, compassion, and listening and talking skills in clinical encounters. Semi-structured interviews investigated the student perspective of receiving patient feedback.

Study sample: 13 Audiology students and 31 patients who were placed at, or received care at an Audiology teaching clinic.

Results: Patients' ratings across all measures were higher on average when compared to students' self-ratings, only correlating significantly for the measure concerning students' talking skills. Five themes and one subtheme were identified: Emotional impacts, A worthwhile experience, Contrasting priorities, Patients retake centre stage, and Self-reflective learners (subtheme Self-doubt).

Conclusions: This study reveals that patient feedback led student Audiologists to report heightened seriousness in their interactions and increased attention on skills vital for patient-centred care. The process boosted students' confidence and reinforced awareness of the patient's perspective. Further research is needed to gauge the extent of these effects and explore the feasibility of implementing a large-scale patient feedback program in audiology training settings.

目的探讨匿名患者反馈意见对听力专业学生的价值,检查学生和患者对沟通技巧判断的一致性,并评估学生如何利用反馈意见:本研究采用混合方法设计,利用李克特调查收集患者和学生对临床接触中的专业精神、同情心、倾听和交谈技巧的评价。研究样本:13 名听力学专业学生和 31 名在听力学教学诊所实习或接受治疗的患者:结果:与学生的自我评分相比,患者在所有测量中的评分平均都较高,只有在有关学生说话技巧的测量中存在显著相关性。确定了五个主题和一个次主题:情感影响、一次有价值的经历、不同的优先事项、患者重新占据中心位置、自我反思的学习者(子主题自我怀疑):这项研究表明,患者的反馈意见使听力学专业的学生在互动中更加认真,并更加关注对以患者为中心的护理至关重要的技能。这一过程增强了学生的信心,提高了他们对患者视角的认识。还需要进一步的研究来评估这些影响的程度,并探索在听力培训环境中实施大规模患者反馈计划的可行性。
{"title":"Developing effective communication skills in audiology using anonymous patient feedback.","authors":"Patrick Bowers, Kelley Graydon","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2399180","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2399180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the value of anonymous patient feedback for audiology students, examining alignment between student and patient judgments on communication skills and assessing how students utilise the feedback.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study utilised a mixed methods design, employing a Likert survey to collect patient and student ratings on professionalism, compassion, and listening and talking skills in clinical encounters. Semi-structured interviews investigated the student perspective of receiving patient feedback.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>13 Audiology students and 31 patients who were placed at, or received care at an Audiology teaching clinic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' ratings across all measures were higher on average when compared to students' self-ratings, only correlating significantly for the measure concerning students' talking skills. Five themes and one subtheme were identified: Emotional impacts, A worthwhile experience, Contrasting priorities, Patients retake centre stage, and Self-reflective learners (subtheme Self-doubt).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals that patient feedback led student Audiologists to report heightened seriousness in their interactions and increased attention on skills vital for patient-centred care. The process boosted students' confidence and reinforced awareness of the patient's perspective. Further research is needed to gauge the extent of these effects and explore the feasibility of implementing a large-scale patient feedback program in audiology training settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142119740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and evaluation of a novel user-operated slider-based audiometry method. 开发和评估基于用户操作滑块的新型测听方法。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2396523
Chris Bang Sørensen, Adrian Bardhi, Ellen Raben Pedersen, Jesper Hvass Schmidt, Christos Sidiras, Jacob Nielsen

Objective: To evaluate a novel user-operated audiometry method allowing users full control in determining their pure-tone hearing thresholds.

Design: Comparative study. Participants were recruited from a hearing clinic after undergoing manual audiometry (six frequencies). They then performed test-retests of a new test (slider audiometry, eight frequencies) and completed the System Usability Scale questionnaire.

Study sample: 37 adult participants, including 30 hearing-impaired and seven normal-hearing individuals.

Results: Mean (SD) threshold differences for octave frequencies between 250 to 2000 Hz between manual and slider audiometry ranged from -7.8 (6.6) to -5.7 (6.5) dB and were significant. For 4000 and 8000 Hz mean differences were -0.3 (8.4) and 0.0 (9.7) dB and insignificant. Standard deviations ranged from 6.5 to 9.7 dB across six tested frequencies. Slider test-retest mean threshold differences ranged from -1.4 (4.7) to 0.3 (6.0) dB across eight tested frequencies, with standard deviations ranging from 4.1 to 8.5 dB. The average usability score for the slider audiometry was 88.3.

Conclusion: When compared to manual audiometry, the slider audiometry demonstrated validity at 4000 and 8000 Hz but found significantly lower thresholds for octave frequencies between 250 to 2000 Hz. Test-retests of the new method revealed small mean differences and acceptable SDs.

目的评估一种新型用户操作测听方法,该方法允许用户完全控制纯音听阈的测定:设计:比较研究。参与者在听力诊所接受人工测听(6 个频率)后被招募。研究样本:37 名成年参与者,其中包括 30 名听力受损者:研究样本:37 名成年参与者,包括 30 名听力受损者和 7 名听力正常者:手动测听与滑块测听在 250 至 2000 Hz 之间的倍频程阈值平均(标清)差异为 -7.8 (6.6) 至 -5.7 (6.5) dB,且差异显著。4000 和 8000 Hz 的平均差异为-0.3 (8.4) 和 0.0 (9.7) dB,差异不明显。六个测试频率的标准偏差在 6.5 到 9.7 分贝之间。在 8 个测试频率中,滑块测试-重测平均阈值差异范围为-1.4 (4.7) 到 0.3 (6.0) dB,标准偏差范围为 4.1 到 8.5 dB。滑块测听的平均可用性得分为 88.3.结论:结论:与人工测听法相比,滑块测听法在 4000 和 8000 Hz 频率下有效,但在 250 至 2000 Hz 之间的倍频程频率下阈值明显较低。新方法的重复测试显示,平均差较小,SD 值可接受。
{"title":"Development and evaluation of a novel user-operated slider-based audiometry method.","authors":"Chris Bang Sørensen, Adrian Bardhi, Ellen Raben Pedersen, Jesper Hvass Schmidt, Christos Sidiras, Jacob Nielsen","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2396523","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2396523","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate a novel user-operated audiometry method allowing users full control in determining their pure-tone hearing thresholds.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Comparative study. Participants were recruited from a hearing clinic after undergoing manual audiometry (six frequencies). They then performed test-retests of a new test (slider audiometry, eight frequencies) and completed the System Usability Scale questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>37 adult participants, including 30 hearing-impaired and seven normal-hearing individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean (SD) threshold differences for octave frequencies between 250 to 2000 Hz between manual and slider audiometry ranged from -7.8 (6.6) to -5.7 (6.5) dB and were significant. For 4000 and 8000 Hz mean differences were -0.3 (8.4) and 0.0 (9.7) dB and insignificant. Standard deviations ranged from 6.5 to 9.7 dB across six tested frequencies. Slider test-retest mean threshold differences ranged from -1.4 (4.7) to 0.3 (6.0) dB across eight tested frequencies, with standard deviations ranging from 4.1 to 8.5 dB. The average usability score for the slider audiometry was 88.3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When compared to manual audiometry, the slider audiometry demonstrated validity at 4000 and 8000 Hz but found significantly lower thresholds for octave frequencies between 250 to 2000 Hz. Test-retests of the new method revealed small mean differences and acceptable SDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142107102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stapedius reflex thresholds obtained in a free sound field as an indicator for over- and understimulation in cochlear implant listeners. 在自由声场中获得的镫骨反射阈值作为人工耳蜗听者过度刺激和刺激不足的指标。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2245141
Annett Franke-Trieger, Willy Mattheus, Josef Seebacher, Philipp Zelger, Thomas Zahnert, Marcus Neudert

Objective: The goal of this study was to determine open field stapedius reflex thresholds (oSRTs) in CI patients with fittings based on subjective loudness ratings. A further objective was to compare these oSRTs and those of eSRT-based fittings that are similar to the oSRTs of normal hearing.

Design: Impedance measurements of the ear drum were taken while subjects were wearing their audio processors. The stapedius reflex was elicited by electrical stimulation transmitted through the activated CI system in response to an acoustic stimulus presented in the free sound field.

Study sample: Subjects were 50 experienced CI users (n = 57 ears) with CI fittings based on subjective loudness scaling.

Results: A reference range for the oSRTs was defined that was identified in CI patients with eSRT-based fittings. Sound levels for stapedius reflex detection were inside the reference target range in 70% of the cases, below the reference range (i.e. down to 40 dB HL) in 20% of the cases, and above the reference range in 10% of the cases.

Conclusion: Stapedius reflex detection in a free sound field may help detect fittings with too high or too low stimulation levels that might reduce audiological performance.

研究目的本研究的目的是根据主观响度评分确定植入式人工耳蜗患者的开放场镫骨反射阈值(oSRTs)。另一个目的是比较这些 oSRTs 和基于 eSRT 的配件的 oSRTs,后者与正常听力的 oSRTs 相似:设计:在受试者佩戴音频处理器时进行耳鼓阻抗测量。研究样本:受试者为 50 名经验丰富的 CI 使用者(n = 57 耳),他们根据主观响度比例进行了 CI 安装:结果:确定了 oSRTs 的参考范围,并在使用基于 eSRT 的装配的 CI 患者中进行了识别。在 70% 的病例中,镫骨反射检测的声级在参考目标范围内,20% 的病例低于参考范围(即低至 40 dB HL),10% 的病例高于参考范围:结论:在自由声场中进行镫骨反射检测有助于检测出刺激水平过高或过低的配件,这些配件可能会降低听力表现。
{"title":"Stapedius reflex thresholds obtained in a free sound field as an indicator for over- and understimulation in cochlear implant listeners.","authors":"Annett Franke-Trieger, Willy Mattheus, Josef Seebacher, Philipp Zelger, Thomas Zahnert, Marcus Neudert","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2245141","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2245141","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to determine open field stapedius reflex thresholds (oSRTs) in CI patients with fittings based on subjective loudness ratings. A further objective was to compare these oSRTs and those of eSRT-based fittings that are similar to the oSRTs of normal hearing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Impedance measurements of the ear drum were taken while subjects were wearing their audio processors. The stapedius reflex was elicited by electrical stimulation transmitted through the activated CI system in response to an acoustic stimulus presented in the free sound field.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Subjects were 50 experienced CI users (<i>n</i> = 57 ears) with CI fittings based on subjective loudness scaling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A reference range for the oSRTs was defined that was identified in CI patients with eSRT-based fittings. Sound levels for stapedius reflex detection were inside the reference target range in 70% of the cases, below the reference range (i.e. down to 40 dB HL) in 20% of the cases, and above the reference range in 10% of the cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stapedius reflex detection in a free sound field may help detect fittings with too high or too low stimulation levels that might reduce audiological performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"695-702"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10510521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ear and hearing outcomes in Aboriginal infants living in an urban Australian area: the Djaalinj Waakinj birth cohort study. 生活在澳大利亚城市地区的土著婴儿的耳朵和听力状况:Djaalinj Waakinj 出生队列研究。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-11 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2252177
Tamara Veselinović, Sharon A Weeks, Valerie M Swift, Natasha R Morrison, June E Doyle, Holly J Richmond, Eman M A Alenezi, Karina F M Tao, Peter C Richmond, Robyn S M Choi, Wilhelmina H A M Mulders, Helen Goulios, Deborah Lehmann, Christopher G Brennan-Jones

Objective: Describe the ear and hearing outcomes in Aboriginal infants in an Australian urban area.

Design: Aboriginal infants enrolled in the Djaalinj Waakinj prospective cohort study had ear health screenings at ages 2-4, 6-8 and 12-18 months and audiological assessment at ∼12 months of age. Sociodemographic, environmental characteristics, otoscopy, otoacoustic emissions, tympanometry and visual reinforcement audiometry data were collected.

Study sample: 125 infants were enrolled in the study; 67 completed audiological assessment, 62, 54, and 58 of whom attended ear screenings at 2-4, 6-8 and 12-18 months.

Results: Of the children that attended the audiological assessment, 36.5%, 50% and 64.3% of infants had otitis media (OM) at 2-4, 6-8 and 12-18 months. Using a 10 dB correction factor, 44.8% of infants had hearing loss (HL) (≥ 25 dB HL) at ∼ 12 months of age. More males (X2=5.4 (1df, p = 0.02)) and infants with OM at audiological assessment (X2=5.8 (1df, p = 0.02)) had HL. More infants that used a pacifier at 12-18 months of age had HL (X2=4.7 (1df, p = 0.03)).

Conclusion: Aboriginal infants in an urban area have high rates of HL and OM, which requires early surveillance and timely treatment to reduce the medical and developmental impacts of OM and HL.

目标:描述澳大利亚城市地区原住民婴儿的耳朵和听力状况:描述澳大利亚城市地区土著婴儿的耳朵和听力状况:设计:参加 Djaalinj Waakinj 前瞻性队列研究的土著婴儿分别在 2-4、6-8 和 12-18 个月大时接受耳部健康检查,并在∼12 个月大时进行听力评估。研究样本:125 名婴儿参加了研究;67 名完成了听力评估,其中 62 名、54 名和 58 名分别在 2-4、6-8 和 12-18 个月时参加了耳部筛查:结果:在参加听力评估的儿童中,分别有 36.5%、50% 和 64.3% 的婴儿在 2-4、6-8 和 12-18 个月时患有中耳炎(OM)。根据 10 分贝校正系数,44.8% 的婴儿在 12 个月大时有听力损失(HL)(≥ 25 分贝 HL)。更多男性(X2=5.4(1df,p=0.02))和在听力评估时患有 OM 的婴儿(X2=5.8(1df,p=0.02))患有 HL。12-18个月大时使用安抚奶嘴的婴儿中患有HL的较多(X2=4.7 (1df, p = 0.03)):结论:城市地区的土著婴儿HL和OM发病率较高,需要早期监测和及时治疗,以减少OM和HL对医疗和发育的影响。
{"title":"Ear and hearing outcomes in Aboriginal infants living in an urban Australian area: the <i>Djaalinj Waakinj</i> birth cohort study.","authors":"Tamara Veselinović, Sharon A Weeks, Valerie M Swift, Natasha R Morrison, June E Doyle, Holly J Richmond, Eman M A Alenezi, Karina F M Tao, Peter C Richmond, Robyn S M Choi, Wilhelmina H A M Mulders, Helen Goulios, Deborah Lehmann, Christopher G Brennan-Jones","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2252177","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2252177","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe the ear and hearing outcomes in Aboriginal infants in an Australian urban area.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Aboriginal infants enrolled in the <i>Djaalinj Waakinj</i> prospective cohort study had ear health screenings at ages 2-4, 6-8 and 12-18 months and audiological assessment at ∼12 months of age. Sociodemographic, environmental characteristics, otoscopy, otoacoustic emissions, tympanometry and visual reinforcement audiometry data were collected.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>125 infants were enrolled in the study; 67 completed audiological assessment, 62, 54, and 58 of whom attended ear screenings at 2-4, 6-8 and 12-18 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the children that attended the audiological assessment, 36.5%, 50% and 64.3% of infants had otitis media (OM) at 2-4, 6-8 and 12-18 months. Using a 10 dB correction factor, 44.8% of infants had hearing loss (HL) (≥ 25 dB HL) at ∼ 12 months of age. More males (X<sup>2</sup>=5.4 (1df, p = 0.02)) and infants with OM at audiological assessment (X<sup>2</sup>=5.8 (1df, p = 0.02)) had HL. More infants that used a pacifier at 12-18 months of age had HL (X<sup>2</sup>=4.7 (1df, p = 0.03)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aboriginal infants in an urban area have high rates of HL and OM, which requires early surveillance and timely treatment to reduce the medical and developmental impacts of OM and HL.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"703-711"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10205953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and initial evaluation of the Hearing Aid Attribute and Feature Importance Evaluation (HAFIE) questionnaire. 助听器属性和功能重要性评估 (HAFIE) 问卷的开发和初步评估。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2253498
Hasan K Saleh, Paula Folkeard, Selina Liao, Susan Scollie

Objectives: To develop and validate a novel questionnaire aimed at providing a structured, evidence-based methodology for hearing aid recommendation and selection using self-reported importance ratings for different modern hearing aid features.

Design: The initial questionnaire items were created through a concept mapping approach that involved input from hearing aid users. Hearing care professional focus groups (n = 10) were conducted to assess questionnaire content and design, and to guide modifications. Validation of this initial 34-item version of the questionnaire was conducted using an anonymous online survey tool (Qualtrics). Exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the factor structure of the dataset, using principal axis factoring. Questionnaire reliability and inter-item correlation were assessed. Items with low factor loading and high cross-loading were removed.

Study sample: Two hundred and eighteen adult participants with a self-reported hearing loss (median age = 48 years, range = 18-95 years) completed the questionnaire.

Results: Analysis and item removal resulted in a 28-item questionnaire. Three factors were identified, dividing the hearing aid features into the subscales: "Advanced connectivity & streaming", "Physical attributes & usability", and "Sound quality & intelligibility".

Conclusion: This study has resulted in a patient-oriented questionnaire that allows clinicians to gather patient input in a structured manner.

目的:开发并验证一种新型问卷,旨在通过对不同现代助听器功能的自评重要性,为助听器推荐和选择提供结构化的循证方法:开发并验证一份新颖的调查问卷,旨在提供一种结构化的、以证据为基础的方法,通过对不同的现代助听器功能进行自我报告的重要性评级来推荐和选择助听器:设计:最初的问卷项目是通过概念映射法创建的,其中包括助听器用户的意见。听力保健专家焦点小组(n = 10)对问卷内容和设计进行了评估,并为问卷的修改提供了指导。使用匿名在线调查工具(Qualtrics)对最初的 34 项问卷进行了验证。探索性因子分析采用主轴因子法评估数据集的因子结构。对问卷的可靠性和项目间相关性进行了评估。研究样本:研究样本:218 名自述有听力损失的成年参与者(中位年龄 = 48 岁,范围 = 18-95岁)完成了问卷调查:结果:经过分析和删除项目,得出了 28 个项目的问卷。确定了三个因子,将助听器的功能分为几个子量表:结果:通过分析和删除项目,确定了 28 个项目的调查问卷,将助听器功能分为三个子量表:"高级连接和流媒体"、"物理属性和可用性 "以及 "音质和清晰度":这项研究产生了一份以患者为导向的问卷,使临床医生能够有条理地收集患者的意见。
{"title":"Development and initial evaluation of the Hearing Aid Attribute and Feature Importance Evaluation (HAFIE) questionnaire.","authors":"Hasan K Saleh, Paula Folkeard, Selina Liao, Susan Scollie","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2253498","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2253498","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a novel questionnaire aimed at providing a structured, evidence-based methodology for hearing aid recommendation and selection using self-reported importance ratings for different modern hearing aid features.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The initial questionnaire items were created through a concept mapping approach that involved input from hearing aid users. Hearing care professional focus groups (<i>n</i> = 10) were conducted to assess questionnaire content and design, and to guide modifications. Validation of this initial 34-item version of the questionnaire was conducted using an anonymous online survey tool (Qualtrics). Exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the factor structure of the dataset, using principal axis factoring. Questionnaire reliability and inter-item correlation were assessed. Items with low factor loading and high cross-loading were removed.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Two hundred and eighteen adult participants with a self-reported hearing loss (median age = 48 years, range = 18-95 years) completed the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis and item removal resulted in a 28-item questionnaire. Three factors were identified, dividing the hearing aid features into the subscales: \"Advanced connectivity & streaming\", \"Physical attributes & usability\", and \"Sound quality & intelligibility\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has resulted in a patient-oriented questionnaire that allows clinicians to gather patient input in a structured manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"712-721"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10592192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An association between auditory responsiveness of children and duration of entertainment screen time in the early years of life. 儿童的听觉反应与早年娱乐屏幕时间的持续时间之间的关联。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-26 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2260097
Josephine E Marriage, Mahmoud Keshavarzi, Brian C J Moore

Objective: To examine whether the responsiveness of young children to simple sounds was associated with entertainment screen time (EST), opportunities for social interaction, and social and communication skills.

Design: Parents completed a questionnaire covering, for years one and two, the number of times the child met with other children; the number of words the child spoke; and the daily amount of EST. Social, attention and communication skills were assessed.

Study sample: Participants were 118 children, aged 15 to 46 months. They were initially assessed behaviourally using simple sounds. Children who responded to such sounds were denoted the Responsive group. Children who did not were assessed using familiar songs and denoted the Unresponsive group.

Results: The two groups did not differ significantly in mean age or the number of opportunities to meet other children. The Unresponsive group had significantly fewer words than the Responsive group at 12 and 24 months and had significantly higher EST than the Responsive group for years 1 and 2. The Unresponsive group showed lower social, attention and communication skills than the Responsive group.

Conclusions: High EST was associated with poorer auditory and social skills. Hence, it may be wise to limit the EST of young children.

目的:研究幼儿对简单声音的反应是否与娱乐屏幕时间(EST)、社交互动机会以及社交和沟通技能有关。设计:父母完成了一份调查问卷,涵盖了第一年和第二年孩子与其他孩子见面的次数;孩子说的单词数;以及EST的每日量。对社交、注意力和沟通技能进行了评估。研究样本:参与者为118名15至46岁的儿童 月。他们最初使用简单的声音进行行为评估。对这些声音有反应的儿童被称为反应组。没有的儿童使用熟悉的歌曲进行评估,并表示为无反应组。结果:两组在平均年龄或与其他孩子见面的机会数量上没有显著差异。在12岁和24岁时,无反应组的单词明显少于有反应组 月,并且在第1年和第2年具有显著高于应答组的EST。无反应组的社交、注意力和沟通能力低于有反应组。结论:高EST与较差的听觉和社交技能有关。因此,限制幼儿的EST可能是明智的。
{"title":"An association between auditory responsiveness of children and duration of entertainment screen time in the early years of life.","authors":"Josephine E Marriage, Mahmoud Keshavarzi, Brian C J Moore","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2260097","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2260097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether the responsiveness of young children to simple sounds was associated with entertainment screen time (EST), opportunities for social interaction, and social and communication skills.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Parents completed a questionnaire covering, for years one and two, the number of times the child met with other children; the number of words the child spoke; and the daily amount of EST. Social, attention and communication skills were assessed.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Participants were 118 children, aged 15 to 46 months. They were initially assessed behaviourally using simple sounds. Children who responded to such sounds were denoted the Responsive group. Children who did not were assessed using familiar songs and denoted the Unresponsive group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups did not differ significantly in mean age or the number of opportunities to meet other children. The Unresponsive group had significantly fewer words than the Responsive group at 12 and 24 months and had significantly higher EST than the Responsive group for years 1 and 2. The Unresponsive group showed lower social, attention and communication skills than the Responsive group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High EST was associated with poorer auditory and social skills. Hence, it may be wise to limit the EST of young children.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"731-737"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41118373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risky listening behaviour to music via headphones and its determinants - 7.5 years OHRKAN cohort study. 通过耳机听音乐的危险行为及其决定因素——7.5年OHRKAN队列研究。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-28 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2261075
Susanne Senninger, Doris Gerstner, Jonas Huß, Antonia Stadler, Fabian Schreiber, Caroline Herr, Stefanie Heinze, Veronika Weilnhammer

Objective: To examine risky leisure noise exposure from listening to music via headphones and to identify potential determinants with special focus on portable listening devices (PLDs) among adolescents over a period of 7.5-years.

Design: Data were collected by questionnaires at four equidistant time points (O1-O4). Music exposure via headphones was calculated based on self-reported volume setting and listening duration. Exceeding 85 dB(A) equivalent for a 40-hour working week was defined as risky noise exposure. Determinants of risky headphone and PLD exposure were investigated using generalised estimating equations and accounting for missing data by multiple imputation.

Study sample: Closed cohort of 2148 students attending 9th grade of any secondary school type in Regensburg (Germany), during 2009 to 2011.

Results: Risky noise exposure from headphone usage was almost twice as high in wave O1 and O2 (at age 15 or 18) compared with 20-23-year-olds in O3 and O4. Risky exposure to headphones and PLDs were associated with younger age, low and medium education, single-parent household and smoking, whereas good self-rated hearing showed a protective effect. Additionally, not being born in Germany was associated with risky PLD exposure.

Conclusion: Before harmful behaviours become entrenched, starting preventive efforts at a young age is essential.

目的:在7.5岁以上的青少年中,调查通过耳机听音乐的风险休闲噪声暴露,并确定特别关注便携式听音设备(PLD)的潜在决定因素。设计:通过问卷调查在四个等距时间点(O1-O4)收集数据。通过耳机的音乐暴露是根据自我报告的音量设置和收听持续时间来计算的。超过85 每周工作40小时的dB(A)当量被定义为有风险的噪声暴露。使用广义估计方程和多重插补法对耳机和PLD暴露风险的决定因素进行了调查。研究样本:2009年至2011年,在雷根斯堡(德国),2148名就读于任何中学九年级的学生组成了封闭队列。结果:与20-23岁的O3和O4相比,使用耳机引起的O1和O2波的危险噪声暴露几乎是前者的两倍。危险接触耳机和PLD与年龄较小、受教育程度较低和中等、单亲家庭和吸烟有关,而良好的自评听力显示出保护作用。此外,非德国出生与PLD暴露风险相关。结论:在有害行为根深蒂固之前,从小就开始预防工作至关重要。
{"title":"Risky listening behaviour to music via headphones and its determinants - 7.5 years OHRKAN cohort study.","authors":"Susanne Senninger, Doris Gerstner, Jonas Huß, Antonia Stadler, Fabian Schreiber, Caroline Herr, Stefanie Heinze, Veronika Weilnhammer","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2261075","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2261075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine risky leisure noise exposure from listening to music via headphones and to identify potential determinants with special focus on portable listening devices (PLDs) among adolescents over a period of 7.5-years.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data were collected by questionnaires at four equidistant time points (O1-O4). Music exposure via headphones was calculated based on self-reported volume setting and listening duration. Exceeding 85 dB(A) equivalent for a 40-hour working week was defined as risky noise exposure. Determinants of risky headphone and PLD exposure were investigated using generalised estimating equations and accounting for missing data by multiple imputation.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Closed cohort of 2148 students attending 9<sup>th</sup> grade of any secondary school type in Regensburg (Germany), during 2009 to 2011.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Risky noise exposure from headphone usage was almost twice as high in wave O1 and O2 (at age 15 or 18) compared with 20-23-year-olds in O3 and O4. Risky exposure to headphones and PLDs were associated with younger age, low and medium education, single-parent household and smoking, whereas good self-rated hearing showed a protective effect. Additionally, not being born in Germany was associated with risky PLD exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Before harmful behaviours become entrenched, starting preventive efforts at a young age is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"738-746"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41127779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic review on the impact of auditory functioning and language proficiency on psychosocial difficulties in children and adolescents with hearing loss. 听力功能和语言能力对听力损失儿童和青少年心理社会困难影响的系统综述。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-27 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2261074
Tjeerd J de Jong, Marc P van der Schroeff, Luuk Stapersma, Jantien L Vroegop

Objective: Approximately 20% to 40% of children with hearing loss encounter psychosocial difficulties. This prevalence may be outdated, given the advancements in hearing technology and rehabilitation efforts to enhance the psychosocial well-being of these children. A systematic review of up-to-date literature can help to identify factors that may contribute to the children's psychosocial well-being.

Design/study sample: A systematic review was conducted. Original articles were identified through systematic searches in Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection. The quality of the papers was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and custom Reviewers' Criteria.

Results: A search was performed on 20 October 2022. A total of 1561 articles were identified, and 36 were included for review. Critical appraisal led to 24 good to fair quality articles, and 12 poor quality articles.

Conclusion: Children with hearing loss have a twofold risk of experiencing psychosocial difficulties compared to normal hearing peers. Estimates for functioning in social interactions, like speech perception (in noise) or language proficiency, have proven to be more adequate predictors for psychosocial difficulties than the degree of hearing loss. Our findings can be useful for identifying children at risk for difficulties and offering them earlier and more elaborate psychological interventions.

目的:大约20%至40%的听力损失儿童会遇到心理社会困难。考虑到听力技术的进步和为提高这些儿童的心理健康所做的康复努力,这种普遍性可能已经过时了。对最新文献进行系统综述有助于确定可能有助于儿童心理健康的因素。设计/研究样本:进行了系统综述。通过在Embase、Medline、PsychINFO和Web of Science核心收藏中的系统搜索,确定了原创文章。论文的质量使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表和自定义审稿人标准进行了评估。结果:于2022年10月20日进行了搜索。共鉴定了1561篇文章,其中36篇被纳入审查范围。批判性评价导致24篇质量良好至尚可的文章,12篇质量较差的文章。结论:与听力正常的同龄人相比,听力损失儿童经历心理社会困难的风险是正常儿童的两倍。对社交互动功能的估计,如言语感知(在噪音中)或语言熟练程度,已被证明比听力损失程度更能预测心理社会困难。我们的发现有助于识别有困难风险的儿童,并为他们提供更早、更详细的心理干预。
{"title":"A systematic review on the impact of auditory functioning and language proficiency on psychosocial difficulties in children and adolescents with hearing loss.","authors":"Tjeerd J de Jong, Marc P van der Schroeff, Luuk Stapersma, Jantien L Vroegop","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2261074","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2261074","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Approximately 20% to 40% of children with hearing loss encounter psychosocial difficulties. This prevalence may be outdated, given the advancements in hearing technology and rehabilitation efforts to enhance the psychosocial well-being of these children. A systematic review of up-to-date literature can help to identify factors that may contribute to the children's psychosocial well-being.</p><p><strong>Design/study sample: </strong>A systematic review was conducted. Original articles were identified through systematic searches in Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection. The quality of the papers was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and custom Reviewers' Criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A search was performed on 20 October 2022. A total of 1561 articles were identified, and 36 were included for review. Critical appraisal led to 24 good to fair quality articles, and 12 poor quality articles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Children with hearing loss have a twofold risk of experiencing psychosocial difficulties compared to normal hearing peers. Estimates for functioning in social interactions, like speech perception (in noise) or language proficiency, have proven to be more adequate predictors for psychosocial difficulties than the degree of hearing loss. Our findings can be useful for identifying children at risk for difficulties and offering them earlier and more elaborate psychological interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"675-685"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"54229028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International Journal of Audiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1