Adherents trust, at first no protected by law positive in Indonesia, with birth Decision Court Constitution No. 97/PU-XIV/2016 related Constitution Administration population. This thing give positive impact for adherents trust namely, protection and recognition by Indonesian law to adherents devotee trust, one related with recording marriage. Valid something marriage from adherents trust implications for rights civil law on child status as well as problem inheritance later. Destination from study this for knowing validity from marriage devotee trust in Bangka Regency based on law positive as well as fulfillment rights civil for adherents trust. Study this conducted with use method law juridical empirical through researching materials References as well as studies cases that develop in the community adherents trust. The results of the research produced in Bangka Regency are still there is marriage from devotee unreliable trust registered so that result in they no get rights civil law, such as right for get inheritance. Study this is very important conducted because still there is adherents trust whose marriage not yet legitimate nationally so that no protected rights civil from the parties, so that study this is very important done.
{"title":"FULFILLMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS FOR BELIEFS IN BANGKA DISTRICT","authors":"Rafiqa Sari, Tiara Ramadhani, D. Darwance","doi":"10.30652/rlj.v7i1.8103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v7i1.8103","url":null,"abstract":"Adherents trust, at first no protected by law positive in Indonesia, with birth Decision Court Constitution No. 97/PU-XIV/2016 related Constitution Administration population. This thing give positive impact for adherents trust namely, protection and recognition by Indonesian law to adherents devotee trust, one related with recording marriage. Valid something marriage from adherents trust implications for rights civil law on child status as well as problem inheritance later. Destination from study this for knowing validity from marriage devotee trust in Bangka Regency based on law positive as well as fulfillment rights civil for adherents trust. Study this conducted with use method law juridical empirical through researching materials References as well as studies cases that develop in the community adherents trust. The results of the research produced in Bangka Regency are still there is marriage from devotee unreliable trust registered so that result in they no get rights civil law, such as right for get inheritance. Study this is very important conducted because still there is adherents trust whose marriage not yet legitimate nationally so that no protected rights civil from the parties, so that study this is very important done.","PeriodicalId":138193,"journal":{"name":"Riau Law Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122289508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AbstractThe personal judges of the Constitutional Court are the main pillars for realizing the independence and impartiality of the Constitutional Court. The composition of the nine judges at the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, proposed three people by each state institution namely the People's Representative Council (DPR), the President, and the Supreme Court (MA). The involvement of the three state institutions in the mechanism for filling the positions of Constitutional Justices has the potential to trigger a conflict of interest (especially in the DPR and the President) which has an impact on the credibility and independence of the appointed Constitutional Justices. The research is doctrinal research by conceptual approach and statute approach. Results study explains that the dynamics of politics in Indonesia do not mature so that the guardian of Constitutional Court judges is threatened. Therefore, to avoid this offense, it is necessary to form an ad hoc committee in the process of selecting candidate judges for the Constitutional Court as a form of implementing independence. AbstrakPersonal hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi merupakan pilar utama untuk mewujudkan independensi dan imparsialitas Mahkamah Konstitusi. Komposisi sembilan hakim pada Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, diajukan tiga orang oleh masing-masing lembaga negara yakni Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR), Presiden, dan Mahkamah Agung (MA). Keterlibatan ketiga lembaga negara tersebut dalam mekanisme pengisian jabatan hakim konstitusi, berpotensi akan memicu terjadi konflik kepentingan (terutama di DPR dan Presiden) yang berdampak pada kredibilitas dan independensi hakim konstitusi yang ditetapkan. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif (doctrinal research) dengan pendekatan analitis (conceptual approach), pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach). Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa dinamika perpolitikan di Indonesia tidak kunjung dewasa sehingga terancamnya marwah hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi. Oleh sebab itu, menghindarkan ketersinggungan tersebut maka perlunya membentukan panitia ad hoc dalam proses pemilihan calon hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai bentuk implementasi independensi.
摘要宪法法院人事法官是实现宪法法院独立公正的主要支柱。印度尼西亚共和国宪法法院九名法官的组成，由人民代表委员会(DPR)、总统和最高法院(MA)三个国家机构提出。这三个国家机构参与宪法法官职位的填补机制有可能引发利益冲突(特别是在民主人民共和国和总统之间)，从而影响被任命的宪法法官的可信度和独立性。本研究采用概念方法和法规方法进行理论研究。结果研究解释，印尼的政治动态不成熟，宪法法院法官的监护人受到威胁。因此，为了避免这种行为，有必要在宪法法院法官候选人的选拔过程中成立特别委员会，以实现宪法法院的独立性。【摘要】个人哈金Mahkamah Konstitusi merupakan pilar utama untuk mewujudkan independensi dan imparsialitas Mahkamah Konstitusi。印度尼西亚国家元首，diajukan tiga orang oleh masing-masing lembaga negara yakni Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR)，总统，dan Mahkamah Agung (MA)。Keterlibatan ketiga lembaga negara tersebut dalam mekanisme pengisan jabatan hakim konstitui, berpotensi akan memicu terjadi konflik kettingan (terutama di DPR and Presiden) yang berdampak pada kredibilitas dan independensi hakim konstitui yang ditetapkan。Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif(理论研究)dengan pendekatan analitis(概念方法)，pendekatan undang-undang(法规方法)。我是印尼的政治领袖，我是印尼的政治领袖，我是印尼的政治领袖，我是印尼的政治领袖，我是印尼的政治领袖。Oleh sebab itu, menghindarkan keteringgungan tersebut maka perlunya membentukan panitia特别dalam propropemilihan calon hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai bentuk实施独立。
{"title":"PENGISIAN JABATAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI BERDASARKAN KAJIAN TERHADAP KREDIBILITAS DAN INDEPENDENSI HAKIM","authors":"Alsyam Alsyam","doi":"10.30652/rlj.v7i1.8088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v7i1.8088","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe personal judges of the Constitutional Court are the main pillars for realizing the independence and impartiality of the Constitutional Court. The composition of the nine judges at the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, proposed three people by each state institution namely the People's Representative Council (DPR), the President, and the Supreme Court (MA). The involvement of the three state institutions in the mechanism for filling the positions of Constitutional Justices has the potential to trigger a conflict of interest (especially in the DPR and the President) which has an impact on the credibility and independence of the appointed Constitutional Justices. The research is doctrinal research by conceptual approach and statute approach. Results study explains that the dynamics of politics in Indonesia do not mature so that the guardian of Constitutional Court judges is threatened. Therefore, to avoid this offense, it is necessary to form an ad hoc committee in the process of selecting candidate judges for the Constitutional Court as a form of implementing independence. AbstrakPersonal hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi merupakan pilar utama untuk mewujudkan independensi dan imparsialitas Mahkamah Konstitusi. Komposisi sembilan hakim pada Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, diajukan tiga orang oleh masing-masing lembaga negara yakni Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR), Presiden, dan Mahkamah Agung (MA). Keterlibatan ketiga lembaga negara tersebut dalam mekanisme pengisian jabatan hakim konstitusi, berpotensi akan memicu terjadi konflik kepentingan (terutama di DPR dan Presiden) yang berdampak pada kredibilitas dan independensi hakim konstitusi yang ditetapkan. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif (doctrinal research) dengan pendekatan analitis (conceptual approach), pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach). Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa dinamika perpolitikan di Indonesia tidak kunjung dewasa sehingga terancamnya marwah hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi. Oleh sebab itu, menghindarkan ketersinggungan tersebut maka perlunya membentukan panitia ad hoc dalam proses pemilihan calon hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai bentuk implementasi independensi. ","PeriodicalId":138193,"journal":{"name":"Riau Law Journal","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132494447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEARIFAN LOKAL MASYARAKAT ADAT DI KABUPATEN PELALAWAN","authors":"Maryati Bachtiar, Evi Deliana","doi":"10.30652/rlj.v7i1.7951","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v7i1.7951","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":138193,"journal":{"name":"Riau Law Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127628761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
F. Ferawati, Erdianto Erdianto, Tengku Arif Hidayat
{"title":"PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA MELALUI NILAI KEARIFAN LOKAL MASYARAKAT INUMAN DALAM RANGKA OPTIMALISASI TUJUAN PEMIDANAAN","authors":"F. Ferawati, Erdianto Erdianto, Tengku Arif Hidayat","doi":"10.30652/rlj.v7i1.7961","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v7i1.7961","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":138193,"journal":{"name":"Riau Law Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115683888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AbstractFraud in the context of online transactions can occur despite consumer precautions. This article discusses consumer fraud practices in online transactions and prevention methods using a normative legal research method and statute and conceptual approach. The main findings of this article are that consumers play a crucial role in preventing online transaction fraud, such as verifying the website or online store before conducting transactions, not providing sensitive personal information, and reporting fraudulent activities to authorities. The impact of consumer understanding of their role and responsibility in preventing online transaction fraud is the potential reduction of fraudulent cases and protection of consumers from financial losses and misuse of personal information. This article aims to increase consumer awareness of the importance of taking preventive measures to prevent online transaction fraud.AbstrakPenipuan dalam konteks transaksi online dapat terjadi meskipun konsumen telah melakukan tindakan pencegahan. Artikel ini membahas praktik penipuan dalam transaksi online oleh konsumen dan cara mencegahnya dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pendekatan statute dan conceptual approach. Temuan utama tulisan ini adalah bahwa konsumen memiliki peran penting dalam mencegah praktik penipuan dalam transaksi online, seperti melakukan verifikasi terhadap situs atau toko online sebelum melakukan transaksi, tidak memberikan informasi pribadi yang sensitif, dan melaporkan tindakan penipuan kepada pihak berwenang. Dampak dari pemahaman konsumen terhadap peran dan tanggung jawab mereka dalam mencegah praktik penipuan dalam transaksi online adalah dapat mengurangi jumlah kasus penipuan online yang terjadi dan melindungi konsumen dari kerugian finansial dan informasi pribadi yang dapat disalahgunakan. Artikel ini diharapkan dapat meningkatkan kesadaran konsumen tentang pentingnya melakukan tindakan preventif untuk mencegah praktik penipuan dalam transaksi online.
尽管消费者采取了预防措施，但在线交易环境中的欺诈仍可能发生。本文运用规范的法律研究方法和法规与概念的方法探讨了网络交易中的消费者欺诈行为及其预防方法。本文的主要发现是，消费者在防止在线交易欺诈方面发挥着至关重要的作用，例如在进行交易之前核实网站或在线商店，不提供敏感的个人信息，以及向当局报告欺诈活动。消费者了解自己在防止网上交易欺诈方面的角色和责任，对减少欺诈案件和保护消费者免受经济损失和个人信息滥用的影响。本文旨在提高消费者对采取预防措施防止网上交易欺诈的重要性的认识。摘要:penipuan dalam konteks transaksi online dapat terjadi meskipun konsumen telah melakukan tindakan penegahan。本文提出了一种新的研究方法，即建立一种新的研究方法，即建立一种新的研究方法。Temuan utama tulisan ini adalah bahwa konsumen memoriliki perting dalam menmenegah praktik penipuan dalam transaksi online, perperti melakukan verifikasi terhadap sitau toko online sebelum melakukan transaksi, tidak memberkan informasi pribadi sensitif, dan melaporkan tindakan penipuan kepada pihak berwenang。当pak dari pemahaman konsumen terhadap peran dan tanggung jawab merka dalam menmenegah praktik penipuan dalam transaksi在线adalah dapat mengurangi jumlah kasus penipuan在线yang terjadi dan melindungi konsumen dari kerugian金融信息pribadi yang dapat disalahgunakan。Artikel ini diharapkan dapat meningkatkan kesadaran konsumen tentenya melakukan tindakan prevent untuk menmenegah praktik penipan dalam transaksi online。
{"title":"PERAN DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB KONSUMEN UNTUK MENCEGAH PRAKTIK PENIPUAN DALAM TRANSAKSI ONLINE DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN","authors":"Martha Hasanah Rustam, Hamler Hamler, Tat Marlina, Duwi Handoko, Rahmad Alamsyah","doi":"10.30652/rlj.v7i1.8050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v7i1.8050","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractFraud in the context of online transactions can occur despite consumer precautions. This article discusses consumer fraud practices in online transactions and prevention methods using a normative legal research method and statute and conceptual approach. The main findings of this article are that consumers play a crucial role in preventing online transaction fraud, such as verifying the website or online store before conducting transactions, not providing sensitive personal information, and reporting fraudulent activities to authorities. The impact of consumer understanding of their role and responsibility in preventing online transaction fraud is the potential reduction of fraudulent cases and protection of consumers from financial losses and misuse of personal information. This article aims to increase consumer awareness of the importance of taking preventive measures to prevent online transaction fraud.AbstrakPenipuan dalam konteks transaksi online dapat terjadi meskipun konsumen telah melakukan tindakan pencegahan. Artikel ini membahas praktik penipuan dalam transaksi online oleh konsumen dan cara mencegahnya dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pendekatan statute dan conceptual approach. Temuan utama tulisan ini adalah bahwa konsumen memiliki peran penting dalam mencegah praktik penipuan dalam transaksi online, seperti melakukan verifikasi terhadap situs atau toko online sebelum melakukan transaksi, tidak memberikan informasi pribadi yang sensitif, dan melaporkan tindakan penipuan kepada pihak berwenang. Dampak dari pemahaman konsumen terhadap peran dan tanggung jawab mereka dalam mencegah praktik penipuan dalam transaksi online adalah dapat mengurangi jumlah kasus penipuan online yang terjadi dan melindungi konsumen dari kerugian finansial dan informasi pribadi yang dapat disalahgunakan. Artikel ini diharapkan dapat meningkatkan kesadaran konsumen tentang pentingnya melakukan tindakan preventif untuk mencegah praktik penipuan dalam transaksi online.","PeriodicalId":138193,"journal":{"name":"Riau Law Journal","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123268773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zulfikar Jayakusuma, Maria Maya Lestari, Nurahim Rasudin
{"title":"KEARIFAN LOKAL MASYARAKAT PESISIR PANTAI YANG BERPOTENSI BLUE ECONOMY DALAM RANGKA PENCAPAIAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS DI PULAU RUPAT KABUPATEN BENGKALIS","authors":"Zulfikar Jayakusuma, Maria Maya Lestari, Nurahim Rasudin","doi":"10.30652/rlj.v7i1.7965","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v7i1.7965","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":138193,"journal":{"name":"Riau Law Journal","volume":"672 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132397019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"PENGATURAN KAMPANYE PILKADA SEBAGAI SARANA PENDIDIKAN POLITIK","authors":"Gunawan Arifin, Saharuddin Djohas, I. S","doi":"10.30652/rlj.v7i1.7977","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v7i1.7977","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":138193,"journal":{"name":"Riau Law Journal","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114368110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Sharia Court is a judicial institution within the scope of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia which has important position in the Indonesian judicial system. The authority of the Syar'iyah Court is regulated through the Qanun of the Province of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (Article 1 point 15 of Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh). The limitations of the qanun that regulate the authority of the Sharia Court raises its own problems for judges to decide cases. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate and identify the characteristics of the decisions of the Sharia Court in the Province of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. This research is a normative legal research with a descriptive-analytic. The results show that the characteristics of the decisions of the Syar'iyah Court in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia are in the form of the decisions of the Syar'iyah courts, the types of cases that are decided at the Syar'iyah courts, and on the basis of legal considerations in the decisions of the Sharia Courts. The characteristics of the decisions of the Sharia Court in these three aspects are not found in other court decisions in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. Jinayat cases are characteristic of the types of cases that are decided at the Sharia court. This type of Jinayat case shows the development of the concept of the Unitary State in the implementation of regional autonomy. The basis for legal considerations in the decision of the Sharia Court are facts (events and law), trial facts, sources of law and statutory regulations.
{"title":"THE CHARACTERISTIC OF SYAR’IYAH COURT DECISION INTO UNITARY STATE OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA ( SYAR’IYAH COURT REGIONAL CASES OF NANGGROE ACEH DARUSSALAM PROVINCE)","authors":"Delfina Gusman","doi":"10.30652/rlj.v7i1.8073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v7i1.8073","url":null,"abstract":"The Sharia Court is a judicial institution within the scope of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia which has important position in the Indonesian judicial system. The authority of the Syar'iyah Court is regulated through the Qanun of the Province of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (Article 1 point 15 of Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh). The limitations of the qanun that regulate the authority of the Sharia Court raises its own problems for judges to decide cases. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate and identify the characteristics of the decisions of the Sharia Court in the Province of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. This research is a normative legal research with a descriptive-analytic. The results show that the characteristics of the decisions of the Syar'iyah Court in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia are in the form of the decisions of the Syar'iyah courts, the types of cases that are decided at the Syar'iyah courts, and on the basis of legal considerations in the decisions of the Sharia Courts. The characteristics of the decisions of the Sharia Court in these three aspects are not found in other court decisions in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. Jinayat cases are characteristic of the types of cases that are decided at the Sharia court. This type of Jinayat case shows the development of the concept of the Unitary State in the implementation of regional autonomy. The basis for legal considerations in the decision of the Sharia Court are facts (events and law), trial facts, sources of law and statutory regulations. ","PeriodicalId":138193,"journal":{"name":"Riau Law Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131410793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Pemulihan Ekonomi Pasca Pandemi Covid-19","authors":"Sukamarriko Andrikasmi","doi":"10.30652/rlj.v6i2.7945","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v6i2.7945","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":138193,"journal":{"name":"Riau Law Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134359916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Wiralogam Company with Citi9 Property Indonesia made an Operational Cooperation Agreement (KSO) for the development of the Tenaru 9 Project. Where in this agreement Wiralogam Company made a loan of IDR. 12.000.000.000,00 (two billion rupiah) to Citi9 Property Company Indonesia through the Notarial Deed of Agreement. However, there was a legal dispute where the owner of Wiralogam without the knowledge of the occurrence of retroactive notarial deed becomes under the hand. This resulted in alleged losses in which Wiralogam Company borrowed money with collateral in the form of land and shop houses covering an area of 20,450m2 (square) and it was as if the cancellation of the cooperation agreement was under the pretext of PT. Wiralogam failed to repay the debt based on what was agreed. This study uses legal research methodswitha statutory approach (status approach), conceptual approach (conceptual approach), and case approach (case approach). The results of this study explain that the application of the agreement under the hands and the date back without the knowledge of Wiralogam Company is an unlawful act on a contract which is contrary to the freedom to contract based on good faith as regulated in Article 1338 paragraph (3) BW. However, the legal protection that must be carried out by PT. Wiralogam as the aggrieved party is to unilaterally cancel through the court on the basis of fundamental losses. Therefore, after the cancellation, a lawsuit against the law must be carried out on the contract as well as abuse of circumstances based on defects of will and deception on the basis of Article 1321 BW
Wiralogam公司与Citi9 Property Indonesia就Tenaru 9项目的开发达成了运营合作协议(KSO)。在该协议中，维拉罗甘公司提供了一笔印尼盾的贷款。12.000.000.000,00(20亿印尼盾)通过公证协议授予Citi9 Property Company Indonesia。但是，在不知道追溯公证契约发生的情况下，Wiralogam的所有者成为了当事人，这是一场法律纠纷。这导致了所谓的损失，即Wiralogam公司以土地和商店房屋的形式抵押借款，面积为20,450平方米(平方)，似乎以PT为借口取消了合作协议。Wiralogam未能根据协议偿还债务。本研究采用法律研究方法，包括法定方法(状态方法)、概念方法(概念方法)和案例方法(案例方法)。本研究的结果解释说，在Wiralogam公司不知情的情况下，在手上和日期下适用协议是一种非法的合同行为，违反了《英国法典》第1338条第(3)款规定的基于诚信的合同自由。然而，作为受害方的PT. Wiralogam必须履行的法律保护，是以基本损失为基础，通过法院单方面撤销。因此，在合同解除后，必须根据《合同法》第1321条的规定，对合同以及基于意志缺陷和欺骗的滥用情形提起诉讼
{"title":"Kepastian Hukum Pembatalan Akta Notariil Menjadi Akta Di Bawah Tangan Pada Perjanjian Kerjasama","authors":"A. Pratama, M. Takim, Rifkah Romiza Romiza","doi":"10.30652/rlj.v6i2.7956","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v6i2.7956","url":null,"abstract":"Wiralogam Company with Citi9 Property Indonesia made an Operational Cooperation Agreement (KSO) for the development of the Tenaru 9 Project. Where in this agreement Wiralogam Company made a loan of IDR. 12.000.000.000,00 (two billion rupiah) to Citi9 Property Company Indonesia through the Notarial Deed of Agreement. However, there was a legal dispute where the owner of Wiralogam without the knowledge of the occurrence of retroactive notarial deed becomes under the hand. This resulted in alleged losses in which Wiralogam Company borrowed money with collateral in the form of land and shop houses covering an area of 20,450m2 (square) and it was as if the cancellation of the cooperation agreement was under the pretext of PT. Wiralogam failed to repay the debt based on what was agreed. This study uses legal research methodswitha statutory approach (status approach), conceptual approach (conceptual approach), and case approach (case approach). The results of this study explain that the application of the agreement under the hands and the date back without the knowledge of Wiralogam Company is an unlawful act on a contract which is contrary to the freedom to contract based on good faith as regulated in Article 1338 paragraph (3) BW. However, the legal protection that must be carried out by PT. Wiralogam as the aggrieved party is to unilaterally cancel through the court on the basis of fundamental losses. Therefore, after the cancellation, a lawsuit against the law must be carried out on the contract as well as abuse of circumstances based on defects of will and deception on the basis of Article 1321 BW","PeriodicalId":138193,"journal":{"name":"Riau Law Journal","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115122619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：