Elizabethkingia spp. is a rare catalase and oxidase positive nonfermenting, Gram-negative Bacillus that has traditionally been linked to an array of illnesses in immunocompromised individuals. This case series reports seven cases of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica infections from a tertiary care teaching hospital. The subjects ranged in age from 23 to 75 years. Associated risk factors included a recent history of surgery, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, use of mechanical ventilation, and presence of an indwelling central line. All seven cases acquired infection in the intensive care unit, and the isolates were resistant to penicillin, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, and aminoglycosides and showed varied susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam, carbapenems, and fluoroquinolones.
{"title":"One year experience of an emerging nosocomial pathogen <i>Elizabethkingia meningoseptica</i> at a tertiary care hospital in Northern India: A case series.","authors":"Nikhil Raj, Vikas Ojha, Apurva Rautela, Vikramjeet Singh, Anupam Das, Manodeep Sen, Jyotsna Agarwal","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_73_23","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_73_23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Elizabethkingia spp</i>. is a rare catalase and oxidase positive nonfermenting, Gram-negative <i>Bacillus</i> that has traditionally been linked to an array of illnesses in immunocompromised individuals. This case series reports seven cases of <i>Elizabethkingia meningoseptica</i> infections from a tertiary care teaching hospital. The subjects ranged in age from 23 to 75 years. Associated risk factors included a recent history of surgery, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, use of mechanical ventilation, and presence of an indwelling central line. All seven cases acquired infection in the intensive care unit, and the isolates were resistant to penicillin, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, and aminoglycosides and showed varied susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam, carbapenems, and fluoroquinolones.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 2","pages":"112-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11245138/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141616356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Viscoelastic tests are now routinely used for coagulopathy correction in patients with cirrhosis. Thromboelastography (TEG®) and rotational thromboelastometry (RoTEM®) are the most widely studied tests in this population. However, they have not been compared with each other in critically ill patients with liver disease presenting with nonvariceal bleed. Hence, we aimed to compare these tests for coagulopathy correction in patients with liver disease presenting with nonvariceal bleeding.
Methods: Sixty adult patients with liver cirrhosis presented to the liver intensive care unit, presenting with a nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleed (diagnosed by doing upper GI endoscopy which revealed bleeding from a nonvariceal source) oral or nasal bleed were enrolled. The patients were allocated to the TEG® group (Group T) or RoTEM® group (Group R) depending on the immediate availability of the viscoelastic test. Coagulopathy correction was done in each group as per established protocols and the results were compared.
Results: There was a significant difference in the fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion between the groups. The TEG® group received more FFP when compared to the RoTEM® group (P = 0.001).
Conclusion: RoTEM®-based coagulopathy correction leads to lesser use of blood products with similar control of bleeding when compared to TEG, in critically ill patients with cirrhosis.
{"title":"Impact of coagulopathy assessment with thromboelastography and thromboelastometry on transfusion requirements in critically ill cirrhosis with nonvariceal bleeding: A prospective observational study.","authors":"Nimi Gopal, Shivali Panwar, Vandana Saluja, Neha Garg, Surbhi Gupta, Guresh Kumar, Rakhi Maiwall","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_65_23","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_65_23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Viscoelastic tests are now routinely used for coagulopathy correction in patients with cirrhosis. Thromboelastography (TEG<sup>®</sup>) and rotational thromboelastometry (RoTEM®) are the most widely studied tests in this population. However, they have not been compared with each other in critically ill patients with liver disease presenting with nonvariceal bleed. Hence, we aimed to compare these tests for coagulopathy correction in patients with liver disease presenting with nonvariceal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty adult patients with liver cirrhosis presented to the liver intensive care unit, presenting with a nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleed (diagnosed by doing upper GI endoscopy which revealed bleeding from a nonvariceal source) oral or nasal bleed were enrolled. The patients were allocated to the TEG<sup>®</sup> group (Group T) or RoTEM<sup>®</sup> group (Group R) depending on the immediate availability of the viscoelastic test. Coagulopathy correction was done in each group as per established protocols and the results were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in the fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion between the groups. The TEG<sup>®</sup> group received more FFP when compared to the RoTEM<sup>®</sup> group (<i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RoTEM<sup>®</sup>-based coagulopathy correction leads to lesser use of blood products with similar control of bleeding when compared to TEG, in critically ill patients with cirrhosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 2","pages":"67-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11245136/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141616352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-06-21DOI: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_71_23
Mohan Bilikallahalli Sannathimmappa, Yamini Marimuthu, Shayma Mohsin Mohammed Said Al Subhi, Faiza Awaidhan Mohammed Bakhit Al Bathari, Mariya Ibrahim Ahmed Al Balushi, Sara Ibrahim Rashid Al Ghammari, Elham Said Al-Risi, Salima Al-Maqbali, Vinod Nambiar, Mohammad Al-Shafaee
Background: This study aims to determine the prevalence of secondary bacterial infections (SBIs) in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) subjects and evaluate their antibiotic susceptibility. The study also sought to identify risk factors for the outcome of SBIs in COVID-19 subjects.
Methods: This single-center cross-sectional retrospective study was carried out at Sohar Hospital in Oman. The study examined hospitalized COVID-19 subjects diagnosed with SBIs during March 2020-December 2022. The relevant subjects' data were extracted from hospital electronic health records and analyzed using STATA version 14. The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was employed for analyzing categorical variables, and P < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.
Results: The research encompassed a total of 817 bacteria recovered from various clinical samples of 421 subjects. The older individuals (39.4%) and men (65.6%) experienced bacterial infections more frequently, with bloodstream and respiratory infections being the most common. Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) were responsible for a higher proportion (85.6%) of infections, with Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae being the most common pathogens. Subjects who underwent mechanical ventilation, received corticosteroid therapy, and who had underlying comorbidities, such as diabetes and chronic renal disease, were found to have higher mortality rates. Neutrophilia, elevated C-reactive protein, lymphocytopenia, decreased serum albumin level, sepsis, and pneumonia were found to be independent contributors to mortality.
Conclusions: SBI is common among COVID-19-hospitalized subjects. GNB were primarily linked to SBI. The severity and the likelihood of SBI increased in subjects undergoing medical interventions and immunosuppressive therapy.
{"title":"Incidence of secondary bacterial infections and risk factors for in-hospital mortality among coronavirus disease 2019 subjects admitted to secondary care hospital: A single-center cross-sectional retrospective study.","authors":"Mohan Bilikallahalli Sannathimmappa, Yamini Marimuthu, Shayma Mohsin Mohammed Said Al Subhi, Faiza Awaidhan Mohammed Bakhit Al Bathari, Mariya Ibrahim Ahmed Al Balushi, Sara Ibrahim Rashid Al Ghammari, Elham Said Al-Risi, Salima Al-Maqbali, Vinod Nambiar, Mohammad Al-Shafaee","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_71_23","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_71_23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to determine the prevalence of secondary bacterial infections (SBIs) in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) subjects and evaluate their antibiotic susceptibility. The study also sought to identify risk factors for the outcome of SBIs in COVID-19 subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center cross-sectional retrospective study was carried out at Sohar Hospital in Oman. The study examined hospitalized COVID-19 subjects diagnosed with SBIs during March 2020-December 2022. The relevant subjects' data were extracted from hospital electronic health records and analyzed using STATA version 14. The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was employed for analyzing categorical variables, and <i>P</i> < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The research encompassed a total of 817 bacteria recovered from various clinical samples of 421 subjects. The older individuals (39.4%) and men (65.6%) experienced bacterial infections more frequently, with bloodstream and respiratory infections being the most common. Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) were responsible for a higher proportion (85.6%) of infections, with <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> being the most common pathogens. Subjects who underwent mechanical ventilation, received corticosteroid therapy, and who had underlying comorbidities, such as diabetes and chronic renal disease, were found to have higher mortality rates. Neutrophilia, elevated C-reactive protein, lymphocytopenia, decreased serum albumin level, sepsis, and pneumonia were found to be independent contributors to mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SBI is common among COVID-19-hospitalized subjects. GNB were primarily linked to SBI. The severity and the likelihood of SBI increased in subjects undergoing medical interventions and immunosuppressive therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 2","pages":"94-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11245142/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141616353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Walking is a fundamental physical activity with significant health implications. Backward gait training (BGT) has emerged as a novel approach with potential benefits, yet its effects in comparison to traditional forward gait training (FGT) remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of BGT on body composition, cardiopulmonary fitness, and inflammatory and metabolic markers in adults. A comprehensive search across electronic databases was conducted following the Preferred Publishing Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing BGT with FGT in adults were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The analysis included a total of 379 male participants across the studies. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant changes in body composition and inflammatory marker outcomes, which included waist-to-height ratio (standardized mean difference [SMD]-1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]-1.89-0.48, I2 = 83%, P < 0.01), body mass index (SMD-0.55, 95% CI-0.77-0.32, I2= 0%, P < 0.01), and C-reactive protein (SMD-0.98, 95% CI-1.28-0.70, I2= 0%, P < 0.01). In addition, the qualitative review revealed potential enhancements in cardiopulmonary fitness and metabolic markers following BGT. While the results suggest potential benefits of BGT on body composition and inflammatory markers, the evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Further robust research with diverse populations, longer intervention periods, and comprehensive outcome assessments is essential to elucidate the true impact of BGT and its utility for promoting overall health and well-being in adults.
{"title":"Effectiveness of backward gait training on body composition, cardiopulmonary fitness, inflammation, and metabolic marker in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tuba Aysha, Saima Zaki, Md Farhan Alam, Saurabh Sharma, Saeed Mufleh Alnasser, Abdulkarim Saeed Alqahatn, Aqsa Mujaddadi, Ahmar Raza, Shibili Nuhmani","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_74_23","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_74_23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Walking is a fundamental physical activity with significant health implications. Backward gait training (BGT) has emerged as a novel approach with potential benefits, yet its effects in comparison to traditional forward gait training (FGT) remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of BGT on body composition, cardiopulmonary fitness, and inflammatory and metabolic markers in adults. A comprehensive search across electronic databases was conducted following the Preferred Publishing Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing BGT with FGT in adults were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The analysis included a total of 379 male participants across the studies. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant changes in body composition and inflammatory marker outcomes, which included waist-to-height ratio (standardized mean difference [SMD]-1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]-1.89-0.48, I2 = 83%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), body mass index (SMD-0.55, 95% CI-0.77-0.32, I2= 0%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and C-reactive protein (SMD-0.98, 95% CI-1.28-0.70, I2= 0%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). In addition, the qualitative review revealed potential enhancements in cardiopulmonary fitness and metabolic markers following BGT. While the results suggest potential benefits of BGT on body composition and inflammatory markers, the evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Further robust research with diverse populations, longer intervention periods, and comprehensive outcome assessments is essential to elucidate the true impact of BGT and its utility for promoting overall health and well-being in adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 2","pages":"101-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11245139/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141616342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-06-21DOI: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_3_24
Josef Finsterer
{"title":"Letter to the editor in response to \"S100B as a predictor of delirium in critically ill obstetric patients: A nested case-control study\".","authors":"Josef Finsterer","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_3_24","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_3_24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 2","pages":"115-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11245137/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141616355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-03-27DOI: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_53_23
Tanmay Katial, Soumya Shree, Keshabanand Mishra, Shivanand Mishra, Mohd Adil Mustajab, Mohit Gupta
Background: This study was done to compare single stage percutaneous dilation tracheostomy (PDT) and open surgical tracheostomy (ST) in critically ill patients.
Methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted on 60 critically ill patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU). The patients were randomized into ST or PDT group with 30 in each group. The duration of procedure and associated perioperative/postoperative complications were noted and compared.
Results: A total of 60 critically ill patients were included with 30 each in both groups. Compared to ST, PDT had significantly lesser mean duration of procedure (5 ± 1.64 vs. 21.33 ± 4.77 min, P < 0.0001) and comparable incidence of complications (3.33% vs. 20%, P = 0.103), which included 5-10 ml of bleeding (0% vs. 13.33%), cardiac arrest (0% vs. 3.33%), atrial fibrillation (3.33% vs. 0%), and tracheoesophageal fistula (0% vs. 3.33%).
Conclusion: PDT performed in the ICU is a quick, safe, and reliable procedure with comparable complications to ST.
背景:本研究比较了重症患者单段经皮扩张气管切开术(PDT)和开放手术气管切开术(ST):本研究旨在比较重症患者单段经皮扩张气管造口术(PDT)和开放手术气管造口术(ST):对重症监护室(ICU)收治的 60 名重症患者进行了随机对照研究。患者被随机分为 ST 组和 PDT 组,每组 30 人。研究人员记录并比较了手术持续时间和相关的围手术期/术后并发症:结果:共纳入 60 名重症患者,两组各 30 人。与 ST 相比,PDT 的平均手术时间明显较短(5 ± 1.64 对 21.33 ± 4.77 分钟,P < 0.0001),并发症发生率也相当(3.33% 对 20%,P = 0.103),其中包括 5-10 毫升的血浆。103),其中包括 5-10 毫升出血(0% vs. 13.33%)、心跳骤停(0% vs. 3.33%)、心房颤动(3.33% vs. 0%)和气管食管瘘(0% vs. 3.33%):结论:在重症监护室进行光动力疗法是一种快速、安全、可靠的治疗方法,其并发症与 ST 相似。
{"title":"Comparison of percutaneous single-stage dilatational tracheostomy and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Tanmay Katial, Soumya Shree, Keshabanand Mishra, Shivanand Mishra, Mohd Adil Mustajab, Mohit Gupta","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_53_23","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_53_23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was done to compare single stage percutaneous dilation tracheostomy (PDT) and open surgical tracheostomy (ST) in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled study was conducted on 60 critically ill patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU). The patients were randomized into ST or PDT group with 30 in each group. The duration of procedure and associated perioperative/postoperative complications were noted and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 critically ill patients were included with 30 each in both groups. Compared to ST, PDT had significantly lesser mean duration of procedure (5 ± 1.64 vs. 21.33 ± 4.77 min, <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and comparable incidence of complications (3.33% vs. 20%, <i>P</i> = 0.103), which included 5-10 ml of bleeding (0% vs. 13.33%), cardiac arrest (0% vs. 3.33%), atrial fibrillation (3.33% vs. 0%), and tracheoesophageal fistula (0% vs. 3.33%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PDT performed in the ICU is a quick, safe, and reliable procedure with comparable complications to ST.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"9-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073646/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140876395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Video laryngoscopes are commonly used along with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes for Nasotracheal intubation (NTI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview laryngoscopes during bougie-aided NTI with respect to intubation time, success rate, and hemodynamic changes during the procedure.
Methods: Forty-five American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II adult patients, with Mallampati grade 1-4, requiring NTI, were enrolled after taking written informed consent. ASA III/IV, restricted mouth opening, and body mass index >30 were excluded from the study. Patients were randomly allocated to intubate with one of the three laryngoscopes (McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview) and the anesthesiologists were well experienced with all of them. The primary outcome was intubation time and secondary outcomes included first attempt success rate, external laryngeal manipulation, Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade, and hemodynamic responses.
Results: The intubation time of McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview, was 86.87 ± 15.92, 82.87 ± 16.46, and 79.93 ± 14.53 (mean ± standard deviation) seconds, respectively, which is comparable with Truview being the shortest. CL grade 1 was obtained more in the Truview group (53.3%) compared to the other two groups, while CL grade 3 was obtained in 20% each in McCoy and Macintosh groups.
Conclusions: McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview laryngoscopes were comparable in performance during bougie-aided NTI, with Truview having the shortest intubation time and better visualization.
{"title":"Comparison of McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview laryngoscope for bougie-aided naso-tracheal intubation: A randomized controlled study.","authors":"Neha Singh, Chitta Ranjan Mohanty, Sangeeta Sahoo, Manisha Mund, Roncall Bhim Raju","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_49_23","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_49_23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Video laryngoscopes are commonly used along with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes for Nasotracheal intubation (NTI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview laryngoscopes during bougie-aided NTI with respect to intubation time, success rate, and hemodynamic changes during the procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II adult patients, with Mallampati grade 1-4, requiring NTI, were enrolled after taking written informed consent. ASA III/IV, restricted mouth opening, and body mass index >30 were excluded from the study. Patients were randomly allocated to intubate with one of the three laryngoscopes (McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview) and the anesthesiologists were well experienced with all of them. The primary outcome was intubation time and secondary outcomes included first attempt success rate, external laryngeal manipulation, Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade, and hemodynamic responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intubation time of McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview, was 86.87 ± 15.92, 82.87 ± 16.46, and 79.93 ± 14.53 (mean ± standard deviation) seconds, respectively, which is comparable with Truview being the shortest. CL grade 1 was obtained more in the Truview group (53.3%) compared to the other two groups, while CL grade 3 was obtained in 20% each in McCoy and Macintosh groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview laryngoscopes were comparable in performance during bougie-aided NTI, with Truview having the shortest intubation time and better visualization.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"3-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073636/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140876394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Insulin resistance is often implicated as a risk factor of cell-mediated immune dysfunction in sepsis patients and results in poor clinical outcome. However, it is unclear whether early insulin resistance is contributory to T-cell dysfunction and poor clinical outcome in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.
Methods: Adult patients with moderate-to-severe or critically ill COVID-19 infection were included in this study. Serum samples were collected at the time of diagnosis for fasting plasma glucose, serum insulin, serum cortisol, and serum glucagon measurements, and the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) score was calculated.
Results: One hundred and twenty-six subjects with a mean (standard deviation) age of 49.6 (16.3) years were recruited in this study, and 62.4% (78 of 125 patients) were male. HOMA-IR was a predictor of inhospital mortality with the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) (95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.61 [0.49-0.73]). With a cutoff value of 1.91, sensitivity was 75.5% and specificity was 45.2%. Higher serum insulin was associated with higher survival with AUROC (95% CI) of 0.65 (0.53-0.76), and the best cutoff was 7.15, with a sensitivity and specificity of 62.1% and 64.5%. Serum cortisol was also a predictor of inhospital mortality with an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.67 (0.56-0.77).
Conclusion: An independent association between baseline serum cortisol and poor outcome in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients was observed. Hyperglycemia and HOMA-IR can also predict poor outcome in these patients with some accuracy.
{"title":"Association between baseline insulin resistance and hospital mortality in moderate-to-severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients without diabetes mellitus: An observational study.","authors":"Tazeen Khan, Shilpa Naagar, Parvathy R Nair, Damarla Haritha, Preeti Yadav, Sudip Kumar Datta, Sulagna Bhattacharjee, Yashdeep Gupta, Dalim Kumar Baidya, Rahul Kumar Anand, Bikash Ranjan Ray, Shiba Ansari, Rajeshwari Subramaniam, Souvik Maitra","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_41_23","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_41_23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Insulin resistance is often implicated as a risk factor of cell-mediated immune dysfunction in sepsis patients and results in poor clinical outcome. However, it is unclear whether early insulin resistance is contributory to T-cell dysfunction and poor clinical outcome in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with moderate-to-severe or critically ill COVID-19 infection were included in this study. Serum samples were collected at the time of diagnosis for fasting plasma glucose, serum insulin, serum cortisol, and serum glucagon measurements, and the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) score was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty-six subjects with a mean (standard deviation) age of 49.6 (16.3) years were recruited in this study, and 62.4% (78 of 125 patients) were male. HOMA-IR was a predictor of inhospital mortality with the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) (95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.61 [0.49-0.73]). With a cutoff value of 1.91, sensitivity was 75.5% and specificity was 45.2%. Higher serum insulin was associated with higher survival with AUROC (95% CI) of 0.65 (0.53-0.76), and the best cutoff was 7.15, with a sensitivity and specificity of 62.1% and 64.5%. Serum cortisol was also a predictor of inhospital mortality with an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.67 (0.56-0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An independent association between baseline serum cortisol and poor outcome in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients was observed. Hyperglycemia and HOMA-IR can also predict poor outcome in these patients with some accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"26-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073644/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140876393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Early rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is characterized by valve regurgitation, leading to ventricular distention and possible elaboration of amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).
Methods: Thirty-one children with RHD were entered in the study. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all patients to assess the severity of the valve disease and cardiac function, thus will be classified into three groups: mild, moderate, and severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR), with and without left ventricular (LV) dilatation. At the time of echo, venous blood samples were drawn; thus, NT-proBNP levels were measured using sandwich immunoassay.
Results: The median NT-proBNP levels in mild, moderate, and severe MR were 32.34, 120.75, and 7094 pg/ml, respectively. The median NT-proBNP levels in patients with and without LV dilatation were 3045 and 30.82 pg/ml. There was a significant correlation between the severity of MR and NT-proBNP levels (P < 0.001), thus a significant correlation between LV dilatation and NT-proBNP levels (P = 0.013). A cutoff value of 2598.50 pg/ml was obtained with a sensitivity value of 90% and a specificity of 90.5% for NT-proBNP levels against severe MR. A cutoff value of 199.35 pg/ml was obtained with a sensitivity value of 73.3% and a specificity of 75% for NT-proBNP levels on LV dilatation. A cutoff value of 2598.50 pg/ml was obtained with a sensitivity value of 85.7% and a specificity of 79.2% for NT-proBNP levels against severe MR with LV dilatation.
Conclusion: There was a significant relationship between NT-proBNP levels and the severity of MR and LV dilatation in children with RHD.
{"title":"Predictor of mitral valve regurgitation severity and left ventricular dilatation using amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide marker in pediatric rheumatic heart disease.","authors":"Dyahris Koentartiwi, Kurniawan Taufiq Kadafi, Fiqi Isnaini Nurul Hikmah, Takhta Khalasha, Ardhanis Ramadhanti, Renny Suwarniaty","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_54_23","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_54_23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is characterized by valve regurgitation, leading to ventricular distention and possible elaboration of amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one children with RHD were entered in the study. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all patients to assess the severity of the valve disease and cardiac function, thus will be classified into three groups: mild, moderate, and severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR), with and without left ventricular (LV) dilatation. At the time of echo, venous blood samples were drawn; thus, NT-proBNP levels were measured using sandwich immunoassay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median NT-proBNP levels in mild, moderate, and severe MR were 32.34, 120.75, and 7094 pg/ml, respectively. The median NT-proBNP levels in patients with and without LV dilatation were 3045 and 30.82 pg/ml. There was a significant correlation between the severity of MR and NT-proBNP levels (<i>P</i> < 0.001), thus a significant correlation between LV dilatation and NT-proBNP levels (<i>P</i> = 0.013). A cutoff value of 2598.50 pg/ml was obtained with a sensitivity value of 90% and a specificity of 90.5% for NT-proBNP levels against severe MR. A cutoff value of 199.35 pg/ml was obtained with a sensitivity value of 73.3% and a specificity of 75% for NT-proBNP levels on LV dilatation. A cutoff value of 2598.50 pg/ml was obtained with a sensitivity value of 85.7% and a specificity of 79.2% for NT-proBNP levels against severe MR with LV dilatation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a significant relationship between NT-proBNP levels and the severity of MR and LV dilatation in children with RHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"43-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073640/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140878401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonitis may progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring endotracheal intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV). There are limited data on the optimum time of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients progressing to ARDS.
Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of all patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who progressed to ARDS requiring MV and undergone tracheostomy. We aimed to conduct a study to observe the impact of tracheostomy on the mortality of these patients and the impact of timing of tracheostomy on outcomes in these patients.
Results: Of the total 162 patients, 128 (79%) were male and 34 (21%) were female. Early group (≤14 days) comprised 37 patients, while 125 patients were included in late group (>14 days). A total of 91 (56%) patients died at the end of this period. Among the patients who died, 21were included in the early group, while the late group comprised the remaining 70 patients. On comparing the patients who died, the duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly different in the two groups (median [Q1-Q3]: 12 [11-13] vs. 23 [19-28] days, P < 0.001). The number of days to death also differed significantly between the two groups (median [Q1-Q3]: 28 [21-38] vs. 24 [14-30] days, P = 0.009).
Conclusion: Early tracheostomy is associated with significantly shorter length of ICU stay in COVID-19 patients that have progressed to ARDS. However, the timing of tracheostomy had no influence on the overall mortality rate in these patients.
{"title":"Tracheostomy timing and outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective observational study.","authors":"Sachin Pralhad Sasane, Madhavi Mahesh Telang, Zeyad Faroor Alrais, Wasim Shabbir Shaikh, Ghaya Zeyad Alrais, Khalid Ismail Khatib","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_39_23","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_39_23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonitis may progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring endotracheal intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV). There are limited data on the optimum time of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients progressing to ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational study of all patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who progressed to ARDS requiring MV and undergone tracheostomy. We aimed to conduct a study to observe the impact of tracheostomy on the mortality of these patients and the impact of timing of tracheostomy on outcomes in these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total 162 patients, 128 (79%) were male and 34 (21%) were female. Early group (≤14 days) comprised 37 patients, while 125 patients were included in late group (>14 days). A total of 91 (56%) patients died at the end of this period. Among the patients who died, 21were included in the early group, while the late group comprised the remaining 70 patients. On comparing the patients who died, the duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly different in the two groups (median [Q1-Q3]: 12 [11-13] vs. 23 [19-28] days, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The number of days to death also differed significantly between the two groups (median [Q1-Q3]: 28 [21-38] vs. 24 [14-30] days, <i>P</i> = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early tracheostomy is associated with significantly shorter length of ICU stay in COVID-19 patients that have progressed to ARDS. However, the timing of tracheostomy had no influence on the overall mortality rate in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073641/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140876399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}