International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics最新文献

Objectives: We assessed the prevalence of the use of new anti-seizure medications and valproate in the female population over two decades.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cross-sectional study of medical records of children and adolescents (4 - 19 years old) with newly diagnosed epilepsy in a tertiary clinical center in Serbia from 1997 to 1999 and 2017 to 2019.

Results: The statistical analysis revealed significant changes in the treatment of generalized and focal seizures and all etiologies of epilepsy. Valproate use in the adolescent girl population decreased significantly from 2017 to 2019.

Conclusion: The prescription pattern of the initial anti-seizure medication changed significantly over the two decades. The results correspond to current guidelines and recommendations.

A 60-year-old man was treated with a regimen of controlled-release tacrolimus (2 mg once daily), everolimus (0.5 mg twice daily), methylprednisolone (4 mg once daily), and mizoribine (100 mg twice daily) as an anti-rejection regimen following living-donor kidney transplantation. One year after transplantation, the recipient was admitted to Mie University Hospital (day X; admission date) to treat coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia. The latest trough concentrations of tacrolimus and everolimus before admission (day X-65) were 4.5 ng/mL and 4.4 ng/mL, respectively. Since tacrolimus concentration was 4.2 ng/mL on day X+3, the dose was adjusted to 1.5 mg once daily to reach the target concentration of 3.0 ng/mL due to the introduction of remdesivir. After starting remdesivir on day X+4, the increased trough concentrations of tacrolimus on day X+6 (6.9 ng/mL) and everolimus on day X+7 (9.2 ng/mL) were observed, which resulted in dose reduction of tacrolimus (0.5 mg once daily) and discontinuation of everolimus. After discontinuation of remdesivir on day X+9, dose titration of controlled-release tacrolimus and restart of everolimus (0.5 mg twice daily) were performed from day X+15. The dose of controlled-release tacrolimus was titrated and fixed to 2 mg once daily at discharge (day X+21). There was no toxicity due to immunosuppressive agents during hospitalization. This case report indicated that remdesivir might interact with cytochrome P450 3A4 substrates, such as tacrolimus and everolimus, and elevate their blood concentrations under high inflammatory conditions.

Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics, investigate relative bioavailability, and provide data for potential additional bioequivalence trials between generic fidaxomicin (test (T) formulation) and the original brand (reference (R) formulation) in healthy Chinese subjects.

Materials and methods: An open, randomized, single-dose, cross-over study was conducted in 18 healthy Chinese subjects. The subjects randomly received T or R formulations and the alternative formulations were received after a 14-day wash-out period. Blood and fecal samples were collected and tested by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental model. Relative bioavailability considering commonly established bioequivalence criteria was assessed.

Results: C_max were 3.58 ± 2.74 ng/mL and 6.01 ± 3.93 ng/mL, and AUC_0-∞ were 35.71 ± 18.68 h×ng/mL and 52.15 ± 31.31 h×ng/mL for the T and R formulations, respectively. The t_max of both formulations was 5.00 hours. The cumulative fecal excretion rate (Fe_0-96h/F) of fidaxomicin and its main active metabolite OP-1118 were similar for both formulations. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CI) of AUC_0-t, AUC_0-∞, and C_max were not completely within the range of 80.00 - 125.00%. Significant within-subject and inter-subject coefficients of variation (> 30%) were found.

Conclusion: Despite the differences in exposure, PK characteristics and fecal recovery of the two formulations were similar, suggesting that an effective concentration of the generic fidaxomicin could be achieved locally in the gastrointestinal tract. Fidaxomicin was a highly viable drug, thus providing reference for future clinical study design.

Objective: Nutritional and inflammatory marker ratios are known to predict response to chemotherapy in breast cancer, but whether they predict adverse effects caused by chemotherapy remains unclear. We investigated whether nutritional and inflammatory marker ratios before starting FEC therapy (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) predict grade 4 neutropenia as a serious adverse effect.

Materials and methods: 61 patients with breast cancer who started FEC therapy for the first time as preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy were studied. Relevant nutritional and inflammatory marker ratios were compared between patients who developed grade 4 neutropenia (n = 44) and those who did not (n = 17).

Results: In univariate analysis, occurrence of neutropenia was related significantly (p < 0.05) to pre-FEC-therapy white blood cell count, platelet count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and modified Glasgow prognostic score. Analysis using cutoff values obtained from receiver operating characteristic curves showed that LMR, NLR, and PLR predicted grade 4 neutropenia. However, multivariate logistic regression analysis identified no independent factor associated with grade 4 neutropenia. A post-hoc power analysis revealed an inadequate sample size.

Conclusion: Inflammatory marker ratios, especially PLR, may predict grade 4 neutropenia caused by FEC therapy for breast cancer. Although multivariate analysis identified no independent predictive markers in this study due to inadequate sample size, further prospective large-scale research is needed to examine the usefulness of nutritional and inflammatory marker ratios for predicting adverse effects.

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic profiles of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and salicylic acid (SA) after administration of two different formulations of aspirin under fasting and fed conditions.

Materials and methods: The study was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, 2-arm crossover study conducted at a single center. Healthy subjects were randomized to receive 300 mg of aspirin in either a 15-mL oral solution (pre-packaged vial containing powder and solvent that are combined at the time of administration) or a single solid tablet to be chewed and swallowed with 150 mL of water. Treatment visits were separated by a 10-day wash-out period.

Results: At 3 minutes, ASA concentrations for the oral solution fed state and fasting state arms exceeded those for the chewed tablet (fed 299 vs. 139 ng/mL; fasting 356 vs. 204 ng/mL). Compared to the chewed tablet, the mean plasma ASA concentration was 74% greater with the oral solution under fasting conditions, and 115% greater under fed conditions. Similarly, at 3 minutes, the mean SA plasma concentration with the oral solution under fed and fasting conditions exceeded those for the chewed tablet (fed 310 vs. 160 ng/mL; fasting 330 vs. 185 ng/mL). Under fasting conditions, the mean plasma ASA AUC_0-last, with the oral solutions was 168,076.8 min.ng/mL compared to 163,726.3 min.ng/mL with the chewed tablet. Under fed conditions, the mean plasma ASA AUC_0-last, with the oral solutions was 179,116.7 min.ng/mL compared to 164,704.3 min.ng/mL with the chewed tablet.

Conclusion: This phase 1 study showed that use of an aspirin oral solution provided more rapid exposure to higher plasma concentration levels of ASA and SA than chewing a solid tablet.