Background: Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) is a recognized alternative treatment to surgery for patients with dysfunctional right ventricular outflow tracts. Patient selection is essential to avoid serious complications from attempted treatment, such as rupture or dissection, especially of the calcified outflow tracts. We describe a case with an unexpected rupture of a calcified homograft valve and main pulmonary artery, which was treated successfully by emergency implantation of a self-expanding Venus P-Valve (Venus MedTech, Hangzhou, China) without the need for pre-stenting with a covered stent.
Case details: A 13-year-old boy had two previous operations of tetralogy of Fallot, one a total repair and the other a homograft valved conduit for pulmonary regurgitation. He presented with dyspnea and severe right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (RVOTO) and had a calcified outflow tract and main pulmonary artery. In the catheter laboratory, a non-compliant balloon dilation resulted in a contained rupture of the conduit. The patient remained hemodynamically stable, and the rupture was treated with a self-expandable Venus P-Valve without the need for a covered stent combined with a balloon-expandable valve or a further surgical procedure.
Discussion: Preprocedural evaluation with an inflating balloon is necessary to examine tissue compliance and determine suitability for PPVI. However, this condition is accompanied by a risk of conduit rupture. Risk factors of this complication are calcification and homograft use. These ruptures are mostly controlled with a prophylactic or therapeutic covered stent, with a low rate of requiring surgery. However, there are severe ruptures which lead to hemothorax and death. In the available literature, there was no similar reported case of conduit rupture, which a self-expandable Pulmonary valve stent has managed. It seems that fibrosis and collagen tissue around the heart, formed after open surgeries, can contribute to the control of bleeding in these cases.
Conclusion (clinical learning point): The suitability of patients for the PPVI procedure should be examined more carefully, specifically patients with homograft and calcification in their conduit. Furthermore, conduit rupture might be manageable with self-expandable artificial pulmonary valves, specifically in previously operated patients, and the applicability of this hypothesis is worth examining in future research.
{"title":"Rupture of a calcified right ventricle to pulmonary artery homograft by balloon dilation- emergency rescue by venus P-Valve.","authors":"Hojjat Mortezaeian, Ata Firouzi, Pouya Ebrahimi, Mohsen Anafje, Peyman Bashghareh, Phuoc Doung, Shakeel Qureshi","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00702-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12245-024-00702-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) is a recognized alternative treatment to surgery for patients with dysfunctional right ventricular outflow tracts. Patient selection is essential to avoid serious complications from attempted treatment, such as rupture or dissection, especially of the calcified outflow tracts. We describe a case with an unexpected rupture of a calcified homograft valve and main pulmonary artery, which was treated successfully by emergency implantation of a self-expanding Venus P-Valve (Venus MedTech, Hangzhou, China) without the need for pre-stenting with a covered stent.</p><p><strong>Case details: </strong>A 13-year-old boy had two previous operations of tetralogy of Fallot, one a total repair and the other a homograft valved conduit for pulmonary regurgitation. He presented with dyspnea and severe right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (RVOTO) and had a calcified outflow tract and main pulmonary artery. In the catheter laboratory, a non-compliant balloon dilation resulted in a contained rupture of the conduit. The patient remained hemodynamically stable, and the rupture was treated with a self-expandable Venus P-Valve without the need for a covered stent combined with a balloon-expandable valve or a further surgical procedure.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Preprocedural evaluation with an inflating balloon is necessary to examine tissue compliance and determine suitability for PPVI. However, this condition is accompanied by a risk of conduit rupture. Risk factors of this complication are calcification and homograft use. These ruptures are mostly controlled with a prophylactic or therapeutic covered stent, with a low rate of requiring surgery. However, there are severe ruptures which lead to hemothorax and death. In the available literature, there was no similar reported case of conduit rupture, which a self-expandable Pulmonary valve stent has managed. It seems that fibrosis and collagen tissue around the heart, formed after open surgeries, can contribute to the control of bleeding in these cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion (clinical learning point): </strong>The suitability of patients for the PPVI procedure should be examined more carefully, specifically patients with homograft and calcification in their conduit. Furthermore, conduit rupture might be manageable with self-expandable artificial pulmonary valves, specifically in previously operated patients, and the applicability of this hypothesis is worth examining in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363450/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142107141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-26DOI: 10.1186/s12245-024-00684-4
Ze-Rui Li, Yi-Chiao Cheng, Zhi-Jie Hong
Background: The indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence test has become a standard test in surgical procedures, facilitating the assessment of blood perfusion in real-time. While its utility in emergency surgeries for evaluating anastomotic blood supply is well-established, its application in trauma cases, especially those involving mesenteric hematoma, remains underexplored. Herein, we present a case to illustrate the efficacy of the ICG fluorescence test in such scenarios.
Case presentation: A 51-year-old man with uncontrolled hypertension suffered blunt abdominal trauma following a motor vehicle accident. We used the intra-operative ICG fluorescence test to chart the surgical plan for the patient. A combination of diagnostic laparoscopy with ICG fluorescence testing effectively excluded bowel ischemia, leading to the avoidance of intestinal resection and the need for a temporary ostomy. The patient resumed enteral nutrition.
Conclusions: Our case underscores the efficacy of ICG fluorescence testing in assessing bowel viability and guiding surgical strategies in trauma patients with mesenteric hematoma. By facilitating real-time visualization of blood perfusion, ICG testing enables the adoption of conservative treatments in patients who would traditionally require more invasive surgical interventions, with minimal effect on operation time and cost.
{"title":"Diagnostic laparoscopy with indocyanine green fluorescence test for the evaluation of intestinal perfusion in abdominal blunt injury: a case report.","authors":"Ze-Rui Li, Yi-Chiao Cheng, Zhi-Jie Hong","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00684-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12245-024-00684-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence test has become a standard test in surgical procedures, facilitating the assessment of blood perfusion in real-time. While its utility in emergency surgeries for evaluating anastomotic blood supply is well-established, its application in trauma cases, especially those involving mesenteric hematoma, remains underexplored. Herein, we present a case to illustrate the efficacy of the ICG fluorescence test in such scenarios.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 51-year-old man with uncontrolled hypertension suffered blunt abdominal trauma following a motor vehicle accident. We used the intra-operative ICG fluorescence test to chart the surgical plan for the patient. A combination of diagnostic laparoscopy with ICG fluorescence testing effectively excluded bowel ischemia, leading to the avoidance of intestinal resection and the need for a temporary ostomy. The patient resumed enteral nutrition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our case underscores the efficacy of ICG fluorescence testing in assessing bowel viability and guiding surgical strategies in trauma patients with mesenteric hematoma. By facilitating real-time visualization of blood perfusion, ICG testing enables the adoption of conservative treatments in patients who would traditionally require more invasive surgical interventions, with minimal effect on operation time and cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11345953/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-26DOI: 10.1186/s12245-024-00682-6
Guyu Zhang, Tao Wang, Le An, ChenChen Hang, XingSheng Wang, Fei Shao, Rui Shao, Ziren Tang
Background: In sepsis, the relationship between lymphocyte counts and patient outcomes is complex. Lymphocytopenia and lymphocytosis significantly influence survival, illustrating the dual functionality of lymphocytes in responding to infections. This study investigates this complex interaction, focusing on how variations in lymphocyte counts correlate with all-cause hospital mortality among sepsis patients.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from two extensive critical care databases: the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV 2.0 (MIMIC-IV 2.0) from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD), which was Multi-center database from over 200 hospitals across the United States conducted by Philips eICU Research Institute. We included adult patients aged 18 years and older who met the Sepsis-3 criteria, characterized by documented or suspected infection and a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 or higher. Sepsis patients were categorized into quartiles based on lymphocyte counts. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality in the hospital, with 90 and 60-day all-cause mortality as the secondary outcomes. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regressions were utilized to assess lymphocyte counts' impact on hospital mortality. An adjusted restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was performed to elucidate this relationship further. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to explore the association across various comorbidity groups among sepsis and septic shock patients.
Results: Our study included 37,054 patients, with an observed in-hospital mortality rate of 16.6%. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models showed that lymphocyte counts were independently associated with in-hospital mortality (HR = 1.04, P < 0.01; HR = 1.06, P < 0.01). RCS regression analysis revealed a U-shaped relationship between lymphocyte levels and hospital mortality risk in sepsis and septic shock patients (P for overall < 0.001, P for nonliner < 0.01; P for overall = 0.002, P for nonliner = 0.014). Subgroup analyses revealed that elevated lymphocyte counts correlated with increased hospital mortality among sepsis patients with liver disease and requiring renal replacement therapy (P for overall = 0.021, P for nonliner = 0.158; P for overall = 0.025, P for nonliner = 0.759). These findings suggest that lymphocytes may have enhanced prognostic value in specific subsets of critically ill sepsis patients.
Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that lymphocyte counts are a significant independent predictor of hospital mortality in sepsis and septic shock patients. We observed a U-shaped association between lymphocyte levels and mortality risk, indicating that high and low counts are linked to increased mortality. This result highlights t
{"title":"U-shaped correlation of lymphocyte count with all-cause hospital mortality in sepsis and septic shock patients: a MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD database study.","authors":"Guyu Zhang, Tao Wang, Le An, ChenChen Hang, XingSheng Wang, Fei Shao, Rui Shao, Ziren Tang","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00682-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12245-024-00682-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In sepsis, the relationship between lymphocyte counts and patient outcomes is complex. Lymphocytopenia and lymphocytosis significantly influence survival, illustrating the dual functionality of lymphocytes in responding to infections. This study investigates this complex interaction, focusing on how variations in lymphocyte counts correlate with all-cause hospital mortality among sepsis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from two extensive critical care databases: the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV 2.0 (MIMIC-IV 2.0) from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD), which was Multi-center database from over 200 hospitals across the United States conducted by Philips eICU Research Institute. We included adult patients aged 18 years and older who met the Sepsis-3 criteria, characterized by documented or suspected infection and a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 or higher. Sepsis patients were categorized into quartiles based on lymphocyte counts. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality in the hospital, with 90 and 60-day all-cause mortality as the secondary outcomes. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regressions were utilized to assess lymphocyte counts' impact on hospital mortality. An adjusted restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was performed to elucidate this relationship further. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to explore the association across various comorbidity groups among sepsis and septic shock patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 37,054 patients, with an observed in-hospital mortality rate of 16.6%. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models showed that lymphocyte counts were independently associated with in-hospital mortality (HR = 1.04, P < 0.01; HR = 1.06, P < 0.01). RCS regression analysis revealed a U-shaped relationship between lymphocyte levels and hospital mortality risk in sepsis and septic shock patients (P for overall < 0.001, P for nonliner < 0.01; P for overall = 0.002, P for nonliner = 0.014). Subgroup analyses revealed that elevated lymphocyte counts correlated with increased hospital mortality among sepsis patients with liver disease and requiring renal replacement therapy (P for overall = 0.021, P for nonliner = 0.158; P for overall = 0.025, P for nonliner = 0.759). These findings suggest that lymphocytes may have enhanced prognostic value in specific subsets of critically ill sepsis patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that lymphocyte counts are a significant independent predictor of hospital mortality in sepsis and septic shock patients. We observed a U-shaped association between lymphocyte levels and mortality risk, indicating that high and low counts are linked to increased mortality. This result highlights t","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346189/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1186/s12245-024-00685-3
María Del Carmen Cardós-Alonso, Lucía Otero-Varela, María Redondo, Miriam Uzuriaga, Myriam González, Tatiana Vazquez, Alberto Blanco, Salvador Espinosa, Ana María Cintora-Sanz
Introduction: Mass casualty incidents (MCI) are unforeseeable and complex events that occur worldwide, therefore enhancing the training that medical first responders (MFRs) receive is fundamental to strengthening disaster preparedness and response. In recent years, extended reality (XR) technology has been introduced as a new approach and promising teaching technique for disaster medicine education.
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of XR simulation as a tool to train MFRs in MCIs, and to explore the perception and experience of participants to these new forms of training.
Design: Systematic review.
Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the "Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses" (PRISMA) statement. Four databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and LILACs) using a comprehensive search strategy to identify relevant articles, and MetaQAT was used as a study quality assessment tool. Data from included studies was not pooled for meta-analysis due to heterogeneity. Extracted data was synthesised in a narrative, semi-quantitative manner.
Results: A total of 18 studies were included from 8 different countries. Studies encompassed a variety of participants (e.g., nurses, paramedics, physicians), interventions (virtual, mixed and augmented reality), comparators (comparison between two groups and single groups with pre-post evaluation), and outcomes (effectiveness and MFR perception). The synthesis of data indicated that XR was an effective tool for prehospital MCI training by means of improved triage accuracy, triage time, treatment accuracy, performance correctness and/or knowledge acquired. These XR systems were well perceived by MFRs, who expressed their interest and satisfaction towards this learning experience and emphasized its usefulness and relevance.
Conclusion: This research supports the usefulness and significance of XR technology that allows users to enhance their skills and confidence when facing forthcoming disasters. The findings summarize recommendations and suggestions for the implementation, upgrade and/or assessment of this novel and valuable teaching method.
{"title":"Extended reality training for mass casualty incidents: a systematic review on effectiveness and experience of medical first responders.","authors":"María Del Carmen Cardós-Alonso, Lucía Otero-Varela, María Redondo, Miriam Uzuriaga, Myriam González, Tatiana Vazquez, Alberto Blanco, Salvador Espinosa, Ana María Cintora-Sanz","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00685-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12245-024-00685-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mass casualty incidents (MCI) are unforeseeable and complex events that occur worldwide, therefore enhancing the training that medical first responders (MFRs) receive is fundamental to strengthening disaster preparedness and response. In recent years, extended reality (XR) technology has been introduced as a new approach and promising teaching technique for disaster medicine education.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of XR simulation as a tool to train MFRs in MCIs, and to explore the perception and experience of participants to these new forms of training.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the \"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses\" (PRISMA) statement. Four databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and LILACs) using a comprehensive search strategy to identify relevant articles, and MetaQAT was used as a study quality assessment tool. Data from included studies was not pooled for meta-analysis due to heterogeneity. Extracted data was synthesised in a narrative, semi-quantitative manner.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 studies were included from 8 different countries. Studies encompassed a variety of participants (e.g., nurses, paramedics, physicians), interventions (virtual, mixed and augmented reality), comparators (comparison between two groups and single groups with pre-post evaluation), and outcomes (effectiveness and MFR perception). The synthesis of data indicated that XR was an effective tool for prehospital MCI training by means of improved triage accuracy, triage time, treatment accuracy, performance correctness and/or knowledge acquired. These XR systems were well perceived by MFRs, who expressed their interest and satisfaction towards this learning experience and emphasized its usefulness and relevance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research supports the usefulness and significance of XR technology that allows users to enhance their skills and confidence when facing forthcoming disasters. The findings summarize recommendations and suggestions for the implementation, upgrade and/or assessment of this novel and valuable teaching method.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342566/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142046599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-05DOI: 10.1186/s12245-024-00671-9
Arif Alper Cevik, Elif Dilek Cakal, James Kwan, Simon Chu, Sithembile Mtombeni, Venkataraman Anantharaman, Nicholas Jouriles, David Teng Kuan Peng, Andrew Singer, Peter Cameron, James Ducharme, Abraham Wai, David Edwin Manthey, Cherri Hobgood, Terrence Mulligan, Edgardo Menendez, Juliusz Jakubaszko
Background: The International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) published its model curriculum for medical student education in emergency medicine in 2009. Because of the evolving principles of emergency medicine and medical education, driven by societal, professional, and educational developments, there was a need for an update on IFEM recommendations. The main objective of the update process was creating Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) and providing tier-based recommendations.
Method: A consensus methodology combining nominal group and modified Delphi methods was used. The nominal group had 15 members representing eight countries in six regions. The process began with a review of the 2009 curriculum by IFEM Core Curriculum and Education Committee (CCEC) members, followed by a three-phase update process involving survey creation [The final survey document included 55 items in 4 sections, namely, participant & context information (16 items), intended learning outcomes (6 items), principles unique to emergency medicine (20 items), and content unique to emergency medicine (13 items)], participant selection from IFEM member countries and survey implementation, and data analysis to create the recommendations.
Results: Out of 112 invitees (CCEC members and IFEM member country nominees), 57 (50.9%) participants from 27 countries participated. Eighteen (31.6%) participants were from LMICs, while 39 (68.4%) were from HICs. Forty-four (77.2%) participants have been involved with medical students' emergency medicine training for more than five years in their careers, and 56 (98.2%) have been involved with medical students' training in the last five years. Thirty-five (61.4%) participants have completed a form of training in medical education. The exercise resulted in the formulation of tiered ILO recommendations. Tier 1 ILOs are recommended for all medical schools, Tier 2 ILOs are recommended for medical schools based on perceived local healthcare system needs and/or adequate resources, and Tier 3 ILOs should be considered for medical schools based on perceived local healthcare system needs and/or adequate resources.
Conclusion: The updated IFEM ILO recommendations are designed to be applicable across diverse educational and healthcare settings. These recommendations aim to provide a clear framework for medical schools to prepare graduates with essential emergency care capabilities immediately after completing medical school. The successful distribution and implementation of these recommendations hinge on support from faculty and administrators, ensuring that future healthcare professionals are well-prepared for emergency medical care.
{"title":"IFEM model curriculum: emergency medicine learning outcomes for undergraduate medical education.","authors":"Arif Alper Cevik, Elif Dilek Cakal, James Kwan, Simon Chu, Sithembile Mtombeni, Venkataraman Anantharaman, Nicholas Jouriles, David Teng Kuan Peng, Andrew Singer, Peter Cameron, James Ducharme, Abraham Wai, David Edwin Manthey, Cherri Hobgood, Terrence Mulligan, Edgardo Menendez, Juliusz Jakubaszko","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00671-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12245-024-00671-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) published its model curriculum for medical student education in emergency medicine in 2009. Because of the evolving principles of emergency medicine and medical education, driven by societal, professional, and educational developments, there was a need for an update on IFEM recommendations. The main objective of the update process was creating Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) and providing tier-based recommendations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A consensus methodology combining nominal group and modified Delphi methods was used. The nominal group had 15 members representing eight countries in six regions. The process began with a review of the 2009 curriculum by IFEM Core Curriculum and Education Committee (CCEC) members, followed by a three-phase update process involving survey creation [The final survey document included 55 items in 4 sections, namely, participant & context information (16 items), intended learning outcomes (6 items), principles unique to emergency medicine (20 items), and content unique to emergency medicine (13 items)], participant selection from IFEM member countries and survey implementation, and data analysis to create the recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 112 invitees (CCEC members and IFEM member country nominees), 57 (50.9%) participants from 27 countries participated. Eighteen (31.6%) participants were from LMICs, while 39 (68.4%) were from HICs. Forty-four (77.2%) participants have been involved with medical students' emergency medicine training for more than five years in their careers, and 56 (98.2%) have been involved with medical students' training in the last five years. Thirty-five (61.4%) participants have completed a form of training in medical education. The exercise resulted in the formulation of tiered ILO recommendations. Tier 1 ILOs are recommended for all medical schools, Tier 2 ILOs are recommended for medical schools based on perceived local healthcare system needs and/or adequate resources, and Tier 3 ILOs should be considered for medical schools based on perceived local healthcare system needs and/or adequate resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The updated IFEM ILO recommendations are designed to be applicable across diverse educational and healthcare settings. These recommendations aim to provide a clear framework for medical schools to prepare graduates with essential emergency care capabilities immediately after completing medical school. The successful distribution and implementation of these recommendations hinge on support from faculty and administrators, ensuring that future healthcare professionals are well-prepared for emergency medical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302100/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141893368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-29DOI: 10.1186/s12245-024-00666-6
Nina Fischer, Xinfei Miao, Danielle Weck, Jacob Matalon, Cameron C Neeki, Troy Pennington, Fanglong Dong, Sarkis Arabian, Michael M Neeki
Background: The recent global pandemic due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 resulted in a high rate of multi-organ failure and mortality in a large patient population across the world. As such, a possible correlation between acute kidney injury (AKI) and increased mortality rate in these patients has been suggested in literature.
Methods: This is a two-year retrospective study of critically ill adult patients infected with COVID-19 that were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) on ventilatory support. Two groups of patients were identified in this study, those who were directly admitted to the ICU or those who were initially admitted to the Medical Floor and were later transferred to the ICU due to either worsening respiratory status or change in their hemodynamic conditions. Within each group, three subgroups were created based on the status of AKI, namely, those who did not develop AKI, those who developed AKI, and those who with previous history of dialysis dependent AKI.
Results: The AKI subgroup had the highest mortality rate in the ICU and Floor patients. Of note, those patients who were directly admitted to the Floor and were later transferred to the ICU for worsening conditions also experienced a higher mortality rate if they had developed AKI during their course of hospital stay.
Conclusions: This study identified a statistically significant higher mortality in patients who developed AKI than those who did not develop AKI among critically ill patients.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT05964088. Date of registration: July 24 2023.
背景:最近由严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒-2引起的全球大流行导致全球大量患者出现多器官功能衰竭,死亡率居高不下。因此,有文献认为急性肾损伤(AKI)与这些患者的死亡率增加之间可能存在关联:这是一项为期两年的回顾性研究,研究对象是感染 COVID-19 并进入重症监护室(ICU)接受呼吸机支持治疗的成年重症患者。本研究确定了两组患者,一组是直接入住重症监护室的患者,另一组是最初入住内科楼层,后因呼吸状况恶化或血液动力学状况改变而转入重症监护室的患者。在每组患者中,根据 AKI 状态分为三个亚组,即未发生 AKI 者、发生 AKI 者和既往有透析依赖性 AKI 病史者:AKI 亚组的重症监护室和楼层患者死亡率最高。值得注意的是,那些直接入住楼层病房,后因病情恶化转入重症监护室的患者,如果在住院期间发生了 AKI,死亡率也会更高:本研究发现,在危重病人中,发生 AKI 的病人死亡率明显高于未发生 AKI 的病人:试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov 注册号 NCT05964088。注册日期:2023 年 7 月 24 日:2023年7月24日。
{"title":"Mortality and morbidity associated with new onset acute kidney injury in critically ill COVID-19 infection patients.","authors":"Nina Fischer, Xinfei Miao, Danielle Weck, Jacob Matalon, Cameron C Neeki, Troy Pennington, Fanglong Dong, Sarkis Arabian, Michael M Neeki","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00666-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12245-024-00666-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recent global pandemic due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 resulted in a high rate of multi-organ failure and mortality in a large patient population across the world. As such, a possible correlation between acute kidney injury (AKI) and increased mortality rate in these patients has been suggested in literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a two-year retrospective study of critically ill adult patients infected with COVID-19 that were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) on ventilatory support. Two groups of patients were identified in this study, those who were directly admitted to the ICU or those who were initially admitted to the Medical Floor and were later transferred to the ICU due to either worsening respiratory status or change in their hemodynamic conditions. Within each group, three subgroups were created based on the status of AKI, namely, those who did not develop AKI, those who developed AKI, and those who with previous history of dialysis dependent AKI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AKI subgroup had the highest mortality rate in the ICU and Floor patients. Of note, those patients who were directly admitted to the Floor and were later transferred to the ICU for worsening conditions also experienced a higher mortality rate if they had developed AKI during their course of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified a statistically significant higher mortality in patients who developed AKI than those who did not develop AKI among critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT05964088. Date of registration: July 24 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11287854/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141792467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-25DOI: 10.1186/s12245-024-00660-y
Ahmed Hasanin, Filippo Sanfilippo, Martin W Dünser, Hassan M Ahmed, Laurent Zieleskiewicz, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Maha Mostafa
Acute circulatory shock is a life-threatening emergency requiring an efficient and timely management plan, which varies according to shock etiology and pathophysiology. Specific guidelines have been developed for each type of shock; however, there is a need for a clear timeline to promptly implement initial life-saving interventions during the early phase of shock recognition and management. A simple, easily memorable bundle of interventions could facilitate standardized management with clear targets and specified timeline. The authors propose the "MINUTES" acronym which summarizes essential interventions which should be performed within the first 30 min following shock recognition. All the interventions in the MINUTES bundle are suitable for any patient with undifferentiated shock. In addition to the acronym, we suggest a timeline for each step, balancing the feasibility and urgency of each intervention. The MINUTES acronym includes seven sequential steps which should be performed in the first 30 min following shock recognition: Maintain "ABCs", INfuse vasopressors and/or fluids (to support hemodynamic/perfusion) and INvestigate with simple blood tests, Ultrasound to detect the type of shock, Treat the underlying Etiology, and Stabilize organ perfusion.
{"title":"The MINUTES bundle for the initial 30 min management of undifferentiated circulatory shock: an expert opinion.","authors":"Ahmed Hasanin, Filippo Sanfilippo, Martin W Dünser, Hassan M Ahmed, Laurent Zieleskiewicz, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Maha Mostafa","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00660-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12245-024-00660-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute circulatory shock is a life-threatening emergency requiring an efficient and timely management plan, which varies according to shock etiology and pathophysiology. Specific guidelines have been developed for each type of shock; however, there is a need for a clear timeline to promptly implement initial life-saving interventions during the early phase of shock recognition and management. A simple, easily memorable bundle of interventions could facilitate standardized management with clear targets and specified timeline. The authors propose the \"MINUTES\" acronym which summarizes essential interventions which should be performed within the first 30 min following shock recognition. All the interventions in the MINUTES bundle are suitable for any patient with undifferentiated shock. In addition to the acronym, we suggest a timeline for each step, balancing the feasibility and urgency of each intervention. The MINUTES acronym includes seven sequential steps which should be performed in the first 30 min following shock recognition: Maintain \"ABCs\", INfuse vasopressors and/or fluids (to support hemodynamic/perfusion) and INvestigate with simple blood tests, Ultrasound to detect the type of shock, Treat the underlying Etiology, and Stabilize organ perfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270766/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141758510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-18DOI: 10.1186/s12245-024-00676-4
João Isuk Suh, Daiane Leite da Roza, Filipe Matheus Cadamuro, Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson, Talita Rojas Sanches, Lúcia Andrade
Background: Trauma and emergency surgery are major causes of morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine whether serum levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine are associated with aging and mortality.
Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in a surgical critical care unit. We included 90 patients who were admitted for postoperative care, because of major trauma, or both. We collected demographic and clinical variables, as well as serum levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine.
Results: For patients in the > 60-year age group, the use of vasoactive drugs was found to be associated with an undetectable epinephrine level (OR [95% CI] = 6.36 [1.12, 36.08]), p = 0.05). For the patients with undetectable epinephrine levels, the in-hospital mortality was higher among those with a norepinephrine level ≥ 2006.5 pg/mL (OR [95% CI] = 4.00 [1.27, 12.58]), p = 0.03).
Conclusions: There is an association between age and mortality. Undetectable serum epinephrine, which is more common in older patients, could contribute to poor outcomes. The use of epinephrine might improve the clinical prognosis in older surgical patients with shock.
{"title":"Catecholamine concentration as a predictor of mortality in emergency surgical patients.","authors":"João Isuk Suh, Daiane Leite da Roza, Filipe Matheus Cadamuro, Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson, Talita Rojas Sanches, Lúcia Andrade","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00676-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12245-024-00676-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma and emergency surgery are major causes of morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine whether serum levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine are associated with aging and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in a surgical critical care unit. We included 90 patients who were admitted for postoperative care, because of major trauma, or both. We collected demographic and clinical variables, as well as serum levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For patients in the > 60-year age group, the use of vasoactive drugs was found to be associated with an undetectable epinephrine level (OR [95% CI] = 6.36 [1.12, 36.08]), p = 0.05). For the patients with undetectable epinephrine levels, the in-hospital mortality was higher among those with a norepinephrine level ≥ 2006.5 pg/mL (OR [95% CI] = 4.00 [1.27, 12.58]), p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is an association between age and mortality. Undetectable serum epinephrine, which is more common in older patients, could contribute to poor outcomes. The use of epinephrine might improve the clinical prognosis in older surgical patients with shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264696/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141723546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-18DOI: 10.1186/s12245-024-00665-7
Natalija Aleksandrova, Jonas De Rop, Frederic Camu, Ives Hubloue, Katleen Devue
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe hypersensitivity reaction characterized by cutaneous rash, lymphadenopathy, fever, eosinophilia, leukocytosis, and life-threatening organ dysfunctions. We describe the case of a 26 year old patient admitted to the Emergency Department for DRESS syndrome after sulfasalazine treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in the right knee. Whole body computer tomography showed multiple neck, chest, and abdominal lymphadenopathy with splenomegaly, massive ascites and severe hepatic cytolysis. Serology results for Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), influenza, measles, rubella, hepatitis A and B were negative. The histologic analysis of skin, lymph node and bone marrow biopsies could not indicate a classical Hodgkin's Disease or iatrogenic immunodeficiency/EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD), Hodgkin type. The relatively small caliber of the CD30 + immunoreactive blastoid cells in the lymph nodes suggested reactive immunoblasts rather than Hodgkin cells. The morphologic aspects of the lymph node biopsies with predominance of T-cells were compatible with the diagnosis of a sulfasalazine-induced DRESS syndrome as the patient had a high RegiSCAR score for DRESS. [DRESS Syndrome Foundation: Diagnosis and Treatment. (2023)] The patient's complex clinical course, marked by two hospital admissions, highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing DRESS. This case underscores the need for individualized care, close patient monitoring, and further research to better understand DRESS's underlying mechanisms and optimal therapeutic strategies.
{"title":"A diagnostic dilemma: distinguishing a sulfasalazine induced DRESS hypersensitivity syndrome from a CD30 + lymphoma in a young patient.","authors":"Natalija Aleksandrova, Jonas De Rop, Frederic Camu, Ives Hubloue, Katleen Devue","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00665-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12245-024-00665-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe hypersensitivity reaction characterized by cutaneous rash, lymphadenopathy, fever, eosinophilia, leukocytosis, and life-threatening organ dysfunctions. We describe the case of a 26 year old patient admitted to the Emergency Department for DRESS syndrome after sulfasalazine treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in the right knee. Whole body computer tomography showed multiple neck, chest, and abdominal lymphadenopathy with splenomegaly, massive ascites and severe hepatic cytolysis. Serology results for Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), influenza, measles, rubella, hepatitis A and B were negative. The histologic analysis of skin, lymph node and bone marrow biopsies could not indicate a classical Hodgkin's Disease or iatrogenic immunodeficiency/EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD), Hodgkin type. The relatively small caliber of the CD30 + immunoreactive blastoid cells in the lymph nodes suggested reactive immunoblasts rather than Hodgkin cells. The morphologic aspects of the lymph node biopsies with predominance of T-cells were compatible with the diagnosis of a sulfasalazine-induced DRESS syndrome as the patient had a high RegiSCAR score for DRESS. [DRESS Syndrome Foundation: Diagnosis and Treatment. (2023)] The patient's complex clinical course, marked by two hospital admissions, highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing DRESS. This case underscores the need for individualized care, close patient monitoring, and further research to better understand DRESS's underlying mechanisms and optimal therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11256461/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141723545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Disaster preparedness is one of the critical strategies for effectively managing disasters and has been an area of high focus in the healthcare sector over the past few decades. The current Indian medical undergraduate curriculum does not describe any novel methods for disaster preparedness training. There is a need for a better understanding of novel teaching-learning methods and modes for administering disaster preparedness training among Indian medical students.
Objectives: Describe the undergraduate medical students' baseline knowledge and confidence level of disaster preparedness. Compare undergraduate medical students' knowledge scores and confidence levels on disaster preparedness after online and onsite delivery of the disaster preparedness module.
Methods: In this educational interventional study, 103 medical students were divided into two groups and subjected to an online or onsite session of the validated disaster preparedness module (based on the COVID-19 pandemic), encompassing a simulation-based tabletop exercise. Baseline testing was done for 52 participants in the online group and 51 in the onsite group of the study. Post-intervention, they were assessed with single-response type MCQs for knowledge and Likert scale-based questions for confidence scores. The pretest and posttest scores were collected, and the data were analysed using two-tailed t-tests for paired analysis of within-group (online group or onsite group) and heteroscedastic analysis of between-group datasets.
Results: One hundred and three participants completed the exercise-52 participants were from the online group, and 51 were from the onsite group. After the intervention, there was a statistically significant increase in knowledge and confidence in both online and onsite groups. There is, however, no significant difference in the 'percentage change' in 'knowledge' or 'confidence' between the groups.
Conclusions: Our study indicates that the disaster preparedness module, delivered online and onsite, improves knowledge and confidence among undergraduate medical students. However, there is no superiority between one mode of delivery and the other. We conclude that online training can facilitate disaster preparedness training as a corollary to the prescribed traditional training methods for undergraduate medical students in India.
{"title":"Comparing online and onsite simulation modules for improving knowledge and confidence in disaster preparedness among undergraduate medical students.","authors":"Vimal Krishnan S, Aaditya Katyal, Soumya S Nair, Kirtana Raghurama Nayak","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00667-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12245-024-00667-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disaster preparedness is one of the critical strategies for effectively managing disasters and has been an area of high focus in the healthcare sector over the past few decades. The current Indian medical undergraduate curriculum does not describe any novel methods for disaster preparedness training. There is a need for a better understanding of novel teaching-learning methods and modes for administering disaster preparedness training among Indian medical students.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Describe the undergraduate medical students' baseline knowledge and confidence level of disaster preparedness. Compare undergraduate medical students' knowledge scores and confidence levels on disaster preparedness after online and onsite delivery of the disaster preparedness module.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this educational interventional study, 103 medical students were divided into two groups and subjected to an online or onsite session of the validated disaster preparedness module (based on the COVID-19 pandemic), encompassing a simulation-based tabletop exercise. Baseline testing was done for 52 participants in the online group and 51 in the onsite group of the study. Post-intervention, they were assessed with single-response type MCQs for knowledge and Likert scale-based questions for confidence scores. The pretest and posttest scores were collected, and the data were analysed using two-tailed t-tests for paired analysis of within-group (online group or onsite group) and heteroscedastic analysis of between-group datasets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and three participants completed the exercise-52 participants were from the online group, and 51 were from the onsite group. After the intervention, there was a statistically significant increase in knowledge and confidence in both online and onsite groups. There is, however, no significant difference in the 'percentage change' in 'knowledge' or 'confidence' between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study indicates that the disaster preparedness module, delivered online and onsite, improves knowledge and confidence among undergraduate medical students. However, there is no superiority between one mode of delivery and the other. We conclude that online training can facilitate disaster preparedness training as a corollary to the prescribed traditional training methods for undergraduate medical students in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11256551/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141723547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}