International Journal of Gynecological Cancer最新文献

Objective: The association between sarcopenia and prognosis in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer remains unclear. This study investigated whether sarcopenia is a prognostic factor in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.

Methods: A total of 52 patients diagnosed with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer who had undergone non-platinum chemotherapy at our institution formed our study population. Body composition and clinicopathological data of these patients were collected retrospectively. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans obtained at the time of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer diagnosis were used to measure the cross-sectional area of skeletal muscles at L3 level. These values were corrected for height to calculate the skeletal muscle index, and accordingly sarcopenia was defined. Overall survival was defined as the primary outcome of the study. The impact of sarcopenia on overall survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models with inverse probability weighting of treatment based on propensity scores and log-rank tests.

Results: The median patient age was 63 years (IQR: 53-71). The most common International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage was stage III (50%) and the most common histology was serous or adenocarcinoma (67.3%). The optimal cut-off value of skeletal muscle index was 35.6 cm²/m², which was calculated using the data of 21 patients with sarcopenia and 31 without sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.06-3.49; p=0.03). Subgroup analysis based on patient attributes and prognostic factors suggested a consistent prognostic impact of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was identified as a significant risk factor, particularly in patients who had higher CA125 levels (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.07 to 5.69; p=0.034) and a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (HR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.02 to 8.31; p=0.045).

Conclusion: Sarcopenia significantly shortened the overall survival of patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.

Objective: To evaluate the correlation between socioeconomic and healthcare factors and cervical cancer mortality rates, as well as the accessibility to prevention and treatment across Brazilian states and macroregions. The aim is to highlight the multifaceted challenge of addressing cervical cancer mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed public data from the Brazilian National Institute of Cancer (INCA), the National Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), and the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Data were collected on indicators such as the Human Development Index (HDI), physician density, average household income, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage, Pap smear screening rates, radiotherapy machine density, and non-White population rates by state and macroregion across Brazil. Spearman's rank correlation test and simple linear regression analysis were employed.

Results: Cervical cancer mortality rates are statistically lower in women with health insurance, positive self-perception of health, located in states with a higher HDI, per capita household income, density of physicians, and radiotherapy machines per 1000 inhabitants. In contrast, mortality rates proportionally increase according to poverty levels, as expected, and rates of non-White population. Considering public health, HDI scores significantly affected Pap smear test coverage, the number of radiotherapy machines, and HPV vaccine uptake. The North and the Southeast regions have, respectively, the lowest and the highest socioeconomic indicators, proportional to their mortality rates. No significant correlation was found between mortality rates and HPV vaccine or Pap smear coverage.

Conclusions: Cervical cancer mortality in Brazil is significantly influenced by socioeconomic and healthcare disparities. This study provides a data-driven basis for public health strategies that address both medical and social determinants of health.

Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the proactive or real-time assessment of patient reported outcomes in studies involving patients with ovarian cancer undergoing systemic therapy.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched (from database inception until February 2022), and prospective ovarian cancer studies (experimental or observational) that incorporated patient reported outcomes, including quality of life, were included. The primary objective was to assess the ratio of studies incorporating real-time use of patient reported outcomes among those studies performing patient reported outcomes. A secondary objective was to describe the patient reported outcome reporting. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist was followed. Descriptive statistics were used.

Results: 3071 articles were screened, with 117 included in the final analysis. Studies were published between 1990 and 2022, and consisted of 35 735 patients (median 140 patients per study; interquartile range 58-415). Median time from patient enrollment initiation to study publication was 7 years (range 1-15). Most studies were experimental/clinical trials (n=93, 79%) followed by observational (n=23, 20%). Therapeutic strategies were assessed in 98% (91/93) of experimental studies, most frequently chemotherapy (n=53, 58%), followed by antiangiogenics or poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (n=8, 9%, each). Patient reported outcomes were the primary endpoint in 7.5% (7/93) and 83% (19/23) of experimental and observational studies, respectively. The ratio of real-time patient reported outcomes assessment/evaluation was 0.9% (1/117).

Conclusions: Completion of patient reported outcome questionnaires involves time and effort for patients with ovarian cancer. Responses to these questionnaires were only assessed in real time in <1% of analyzed studies. Efforts should be made to incorporate proactive assessment of patient reported outcomes to optimize patient care and safety.

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a group of rare but highly curable pregnancy-related tumors, especially in low-risk cases. However, around 25% of patients with GTN develop either resistant or recurrent disease after initial chemotherapy. To enhance the understanding of the mechanisms driving treatment failures and to develop more personalized and effective therapeutic strategies, this review explored diverse factors influencing low-risk GTN prognosis. These factors include FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) risk score, histology, patient age, pregnancy type, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels, disease duration, tumor characteristics, metastasis, Doppler ultrasonography, and consolidation chemotherapy. Additionally, the review examined independent risk determinants for disease recurrence and resistance to single-agent chemotherapy in patients with low-risk GTN. In most previous studies on the risk factors related to low-risk GTN, resistance and recurrence have typically been examined independently, despite their overlapping and interrelated nature. Furthermore, they often involve small sample sizes, suffer from methodological shortcomings, and exhibit limited statistical power.Studies utilizing multivariate analysis have shown that independent risk determinants for resistance to first-line treatment include FIGO score, metastatic disease, pre-treatment hCG level, interval between antecedent pregnancy and GTN diagnosis, tumor size, uterine artery pulsatility index (UAPI), choriocarcinoma, lung metastases, lung nodule size, and clearance hCG quartile. The independent predictive factors associated with recurrence include lung metastases, lung nodule size, interval between antecedent pregnancy and chemotherapy, interval from first chemotherapy to hCG normalization, post-delivery low-risk GTN, number of chemotherapy courses to achieve hCG normalization, and number of consolidation chemotherapy cycles. However, while these identified predictive factors offer valuable guidance, the variability in definitions and populations across studies may have implications for the generalizability of their findings. A comprehensive approach using clear definitions and taking into account multiple predictive factors may be necessary for accurately assessing the risk of resistance and recurrence in patients with low-risk GTN.

Objective: Treatment of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas relies on surgery and chemotherapy, potentially followed by bevacizumab and/or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). The modeled CA-125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM) is a pragmatic indicator of tumor primary chemosensitivity. Although it is well established that BRCA mutations are associated with platinum sensitivity, the relationship between BRCA status and KELIM score has yet to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the interactions between BRCA and KELIM, and their respective prognostic values.

Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 743 patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas included in a French nationwide registry (NCT03275298) treated with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by surgery. We analyzed the interactions between BRCA and KELIM, and their impacts on progression-free survival and overall survival.

Results: BRCA-mutated (BRCAm) patients had higher standardized KELIM than BRCA-wild type (BRCAwt) tumors (median 1.16 vs 1.06, respectively; p=0.001). The prognostic value of the KELIM score was independent of BRCA in multivariate analyses. KELIM score and BRCA could be combined to define three prognostic groups: (1) an unfavorable prognostic group with both BRCAwt and unfavorable KELIM (median progression-free survival 12.0 months); (2) an intermediate prognostic group with either BRCAm and unfavorable KELIM, or BRCAwt and favorable KELIM (median progression-free survival of 16.0 and 18.8 months, respectively; HR 0.64 compared with the unfavorable group, p<0.001); and (3) a favorable prognostic group with both BRCAm and favorable KELIM (median progression-free survival 28.8 months; HR 0.37 compared with the unfavorable group, p<0.001).

Conclusions: The KELIM score provides complementary prognostic information with respect to BRCA, and discriminates different prognoses within BRCAm or BRCAwt patients. Patients with both BRCAwt/unfavorable KELIM have a poor prognosis, underscoring the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies.

Objective: To investigate the prevalence and patterns of social media use among gynecologic oncologists for professional and academic purposes.

Methods: A prospective online survey between November and December 2022 targeted gynecologic oncology practitioners (gynecologic oncologists, surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation/clinical oncologists, and onco-pathologists/pathologists). The survey, distributed via various social media platforms, included 40 questions to capture qualitative and quantitative data on social media use.

Results: Of 131 respondents from 32 countries, 106 (80.9%) were gynecologic oncologists and affiliated with academic institutions (84.7%). Facebook (n=110, 83.9%), Twitter (n= 108, 82.4%), and Instagram (n=100, 76.3%) were the most used platforms. Respondents used social media to stay updated (n=101, 77.1%), network (n=97, 74%), learn about conferences and webinars (n=97, 74%), and engage in academic discussions (n=84, 64.1%). Following the COVID-19 pandemic, 100/129 (77.5%) reported increased social media use. However, only 32 (24.4%) used it to connect with patients, and concerns were raised about privacy and the need for separate professional and personal accounts. A quarter of respondents hesitated to share their opinions on social media due to the fear of controversy, with 26 (20%) experiencing cyberbullying, yet 120/130 (92.3%) believed it enabled junior professionals to express their views. Concerns about differentiating valid content, information reliability, and the professional perception of sourcing knowledge from social media were noted. Gender, age, specialty, and income level influenced patterns of social media use, with variations in preferences for platforms, content engagement, and purposes, highlighting a complex landscape of social media interaction among gynecologic oncologists.

Conclusion: While the use of social media among gynecologic oncologists is prevalent, particularly for academic and professional development, challenges such as cyberbullying, privacy concerns, and the need for formal training in social media navigation persist. Tailored training programs and guidelines could enhance social media's effective and ethical use in this field, promoting a safe environment for professional expression and engagement.

Objective: Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy worldwide. While common prognostic factors are identified, the impact of serum lipoproteins remains controversial. This retrospective cohort study aims to investigate the association between specific lipoprotein levels and prognosis.

Methods: Clinical data of 420 participants with epithelial ovarian cancer registered at Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, between January 2014 and April 2021 were included. Cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to assess prognosis, estimated by hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A novel prognostic model incorporating lipoproteins was developed for evaluating the prognosis. Meta-analysis was applied to assess the impact of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) on prognosis.

Results: Among 420 patients, those in advanced stages exhibited higher low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (p=0.008) and lower high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (p<0.001), with no significant differences in total cholesterol or triglyceride levels. Elevated LDL-C level was significantly associated with worse overall survival (HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.15 to 2.58; p=0.010) and progression free survival (HR 1.94; 95% CI 1.46 to 2.58; p<0.001), whereas higher HDL-C level was linked to better overall survival (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.85; p=0.004) and progression free survival (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.81; p<0.001). A novel prognostic model, low density lipoprotein cholesterol-high density lipoprotein cholesterol-fibrinogen-lactate dehydrogenase-prealbumin-Fe-stage (LH-FLPFS), was established to enhance prognostic predictive efficacy. The meta-analysis further suggested that higher LDL-C level was associated with worse overall survival (HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.39 to 2.38; p<0.001).

Conclusions: In this study, preoperative LDL-C and HDL-C levels emerged as potential prognostic factors for ovarian cancer. Establishment of a novel prognostic model, LH-FLPFS, holds promise for significantly improving prognostic predictive efficacy.