Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-11DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102795
Christian Marth, Richard G Moore, Mariusz Bidziński, Vanda Salutari, Özden Altundağ, Maria Jesús Rubio, Tally Levy, Alison Stillie, Christof Vulsteke, Ralf Witteler, Kazuya Ariyoshi, Xiaohua Wu, Sophia Frentzas, André Mattar, Brian M Slomovitz, Stephanie Lheureux, Xiaojun Chen, Kosei Hasegawa, Manuel Magallanes, Chel Hun Choi, Mariia Shalkova, Diego Lucas Kaen, Karen Cadoo, Lili Yao, Jodi McKenzie, Chinyere E Okpara, Robin Meng, Robert Orlowski, Lucy Gilbert, Vicky Makker
Objective: The phase 3 ENGOT-en9/LEAP-001 trial (NCT03884101) comparing first-line lenvatinib+pembrolizumab with carboplatin+paclitaxel did not meet pre-specified statistical criteria for overall survival or progression-free survival in participants with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer. We report results after an additional year of follow-up (overall median 54.5 [range; 46.5-69.0] months).
Methods: Eligible participants were adult females with stage III to IV or recurrent, histologically confirmed endometrial cancer. Measurable or non-measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and radiographically apparent disease per blinded independent central review was required. Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to lenvatinib+pembrolizumab or chemotherapy (paclitaxel+carboplatin). The primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included objective response rate per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review and safety.
Results: The median overall survival (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 30.9 (range; 25.4-37.6) months with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab versus 29.4 (range; 26.2-34.8) months with chemotherapy in mismatch repair-proficient endometrial cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.21), 37.9 (range; 32.2-43.0) versus 32.3 (range; 27.2-35.7) months in all-comers (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.09), and not reached in either treatment group in mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.93]). Corresponding results for progression-free survival were 9.6 (range; 8.2-11.9) versus 10.2 (range; 8.4-10.5) months (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.22), 12.5 (range; 10.3-15.1) versus 10.2 (range; 8.4-10.4) months (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.10]), and 31.8 (22.5 to not reached) versus 9.0 (range; 8.2-17.1) months (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.93). Objective response rates were 50.6% versus 54.7%, 55.7% versus 55.5%, and 72.0% versus 58.0%, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. The results were consistent with those at the final analysis.
Conclusions: The mismatch repair-proficient, all-comer, and mismatch repair-deficient populations continued to demonstrate antitumor activity for lenvatinib+pembrolizumab after an additional year of follow-up. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the exploratory nature of the analysis.
目的:在晚期/复发性子宫内膜癌患者中,比较一线lenvatinib+pembrolizumab与卡铂+紫杉醇的3期ENGOT-en9/ leap001试验(NCT03884101)没有达到预先规定的总生存或无进展生存的统计标准。我们报告了额外一年随访后的结果(总中位54.5[范围;46.5-69.0]个月)。方法:符合条件的参与者是III期至IV期或复发,组织学证实的子宫内膜癌的成年女性。需要根据实体肿瘤应答评价标准(RECIST) 1.1版可测量或不可测量的疾病和根据独立盲法中心评价的放射学上明显的疾病。参与者按1:1随机分配至lenvatinib+pembrolizumab或化疗(紫杉醇+卡铂)组。通过盲法独立中心评价,主要终点是RECIST 1.1版的总生存期和无进展生存期。次要终点包括经盲法独立中心评价的RECIST 1.1版客观缓解率和安全性。结果:lenvatinib+pembrolizumab组的中位总生存期(95%置信区间[CI])为30.9(范围;25.4-37.6)个月,而化疗组的错配修复精通子宫内膜癌的中位总生存期为29.4(范围;26.2-34.8)个月(风险比[HR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.82至1.21),37.9(范围;32.2-43.0)对32.3(范围;27.2-35.7)个月(HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77 - 1.09),而错配修复缺陷子宫内膜癌两组均未达到(HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 - 0.93)。相应的无进展生存期结果为9.6(范围8.2-11.9)vs 10.2(范围8.4-10.5)个月(HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.83 - 1.22), 12.5(范围10.3-15.1)vs 10.2(范围8.4-10.4)个月(HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77 - 1.10), 31.8(22.5 -未达到)vs 9.0(范围8.2-17.1)个月(HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.93)。客观缓解率分别为50.6%对54.7%、55.7%对55.5%、72.0%对58.0%。没有发现新的安全信号。结果与最终分析结果一致。结论:在额外一年的随访后,精通错配修复、所有患者和错配修复缺陷人群继续表现出lenvatinib+pembrolizumab的抗肿瘤活性。由于分析的探索性,这些结果应谨慎解释。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.govNCT03884101。
{"title":"First-line lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer: 1-Year follow-up after final analysis of the ENGOT-en9/LEAP-001 phase 3 trial.","authors":"Christian Marth, Richard G Moore, Mariusz Bidziński, Vanda Salutari, Özden Altundağ, Maria Jesús Rubio, Tally Levy, Alison Stillie, Christof Vulsteke, Ralf Witteler, Kazuya Ariyoshi, Xiaohua Wu, Sophia Frentzas, André Mattar, Brian M Slomovitz, Stephanie Lheureux, Xiaojun Chen, Kosei Hasegawa, Manuel Magallanes, Chel Hun Choi, Mariia Shalkova, Diego Lucas Kaen, Karen Cadoo, Lili Yao, Jodi McKenzie, Chinyere E Okpara, Robin Meng, Robert Orlowski, Lucy Gilbert, Vicky Makker","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102795","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102795","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The phase 3 ENGOT-en9/LEAP-001 trial (NCT03884101) comparing first-line lenvatinib+pembrolizumab with carboplatin+paclitaxel did not meet pre-specified statistical criteria for overall survival or progression-free survival in participants with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer. We report results after an additional year of follow-up (overall median 54.5 [range; 46.5-69.0] months).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants were adult females with stage III to IV or recurrent, histologically confirmed endometrial cancer. Measurable or non-measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and radiographically apparent disease per blinded independent central review was required. Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to lenvatinib+pembrolizumab or chemotherapy (paclitaxel+carboplatin). The primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included objective response rate per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall survival (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 30.9 (range; 25.4-37.6) months with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab versus 29.4 (range; 26.2-34.8) months with chemotherapy in mismatch repair-proficient endometrial cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.21), 37.9 (range; 32.2-43.0) versus 32.3 (range; 27.2-35.7) months in all-comers (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.09), and not reached in either treatment group in mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.93]). Corresponding results for progression-free survival were 9.6 (range; 8.2-11.9) versus 10.2 (range; 8.4-10.5) months (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.22), 12.5 (range; 10.3-15.1) versus 10.2 (range; 8.4-10.4) months (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.10]), and 31.8 (22.5 to not reached) versus 9.0 (range; 8.2-17.1) months (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.93). Objective response rates were 50.6% versus 54.7%, 55.7% versus 55.5%, and 72.0% versus 58.0%, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. The results were consistent with those at the final analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mismatch repair-proficient, all-comer, and mismatch repair-deficient populations continued to demonstrate antitumor activity for lenvatinib+pembrolizumab after an additional year of follow-up. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the exploratory nature of the analysis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT03884101.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"36 1","pages":"102795"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-20DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102746
Hyun-Woong Cho, Suk-Joon Chang, Myong Cheol Lim, Ji Hyun Kim, Sang-Yoon Park, Jung-Yun Lee, Dong Hoon Suh, Jae-Yun Song, Min Chul Choi, Mi Kyung Kim, Hee-Seung Kim, Aurore Carrot, Benoit You
Objective: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) administered during interval cytoreductive surgery has shown survival benefits in advanced ovarian cancer. However, predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection for HIPEC are lacking. We evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of the modeled CA125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM), a surrogate marker of tumor chemosensitivity, in relation to the benefit of HIPEC.
Methods: This pooled analysis included patients from the KOV-HIPEC-01 phase III trial and the KGOG3042 cohort study. KELIM values were estimated using CA125 kinetics during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by KELIM score as favorable (≥1.0) or unfavorable (<1.0). The impact of HIPEC on progression free survival and overall survival was evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.
Results: KELIM was assessable in 213 patients. In those with an unfavorable KELIM score, HIPEC significantly improved progression free survival (20.04 vs 10.25 months; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.71) and overall survival (not reached vs 45.5 months; HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.73). No significant benefit from HIPEC was observed in patients with a favorable KELIM score. Subgroup analyses revealed that the benefit of HIPEC in patients with an unfavorable KELIM was more pronounced in those with high-grade serous carcinoma, BRCA1/2 wild-type status, age >60 years, and stage IV disease.
Conclusions: HIPEC may provide survival benefit primarily in patients with an unfavorable KELIM score. KELIM may be a clinically useful biomarker to guide patient selection for HIPEC during interval cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer.
目的:在间歇细胞减少手术期间给予腹腔高温化疗(HIPEC)已显示出晚期卵巢癌的生存益处。然而,指导患者选择HIPEC的预测性生物标志物缺乏。我们评估了模型CA125消除率常数K (KELIM)的预后和预测价值,KELIM是肿瘤化疗敏感性的替代标志物,与HIPEC的益处有关。方法:本汇总分析纳入了kv - hipec -01 III期试验和KGOG3042队列研究的患者。在新辅助化疗期间使用CA125动力学估计KELIM值。根据KELIM评分将患者分为有利(≥1.0)和不利(结果:213例患者可评估KELIM)。在KELIM评分不理想的患者中,HIPEC显著改善了无进展生存期(20.04 vs 10.25个月;HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 ~ 0.71)和总生存期(未达到vs 45.5个月;HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12 ~ 0.73)。在KELIM评分良好的患者中,没有观察到HIPEC的显著益处。亚组分析显示,HIPEC对不良KELIM患者的益处在高级别浆液性癌、BRCA1/2野生型、年龄60岁和IV期疾病患者中更为明显。结论:HIPEC可能主要对KELIM评分不理想的患者提供生存益处。KELIM可能是一个临床有用的生物标志物,指导晚期卵巢癌患者在间隔期细胞减少手术中选择HIPEC。
{"title":"Utility of CA125 KELIM in predicting benefit from hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: pooled analysis of KGOG3042 and KOV-HIPEC-01.","authors":"Hyun-Woong Cho, Suk-Joon Chang, Myong Cheol Lim, Ji Hyun Kim, Sang-Yoon Park, Jung-Yun Lee, Dong Hoon Suh, Jae-Yun Song, Min Chul Choi, Mi Kyung Kim, Hee-Seung Kim, Aurore Carrot, Benoit You","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102746","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102746","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) administered during interval cytoreductive surgery has shown survival benefits in advanced ovarian cancer. However, predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection for HIPEC are lacking. We evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of the modeled CA125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM), a surrogate marker of tumor chemosensitivity, in relation to the benefit of HIPEC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pooled analysis included patients from the KOV-HIPEC-01 phase III trial and the KGOG3042 cohort study. KELIM values were estimated using CA125 kinetics during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by KELIM score as favorable (≥1.0) or unfavorable (<1.0). The impact of HIPEC on progression free survival and overall survival was evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>KELIM was assessable in 213 patients. In those with an unfavorable KELIM score, HIPEC significantly improved progression free survival (20.04 vs 10.25 months; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.71) and overall survival (not reached vs 45.5 months; HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.73). No significant benefit from HIPEC was observed in patients with a favorable KELIM score. Subgroup analyses revealed that the benefit of HIPEC in patients with an unfavorable KELIM was more pronounced in those with high-grade serous carcinoma, BRCA1/2 wild-type status, age >60 years, and stage IV disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HIPEC may provide survival benefit primarily in patients with an unfavorable KELIM score. KELIM may be a clinically useful biomarker to guide patient selection for HIPEC during interval cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"36 1","pages":"102746"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145556832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Surgical resection of a hepato-gastric recurrence of a high-grade serous ovarian cancer.","authors":"Giulio Ricotta, Elodie Gauroy, Mathilde Del, Gwenaël Ferron, Emmanuel Cuellar, Alejandra Martinez","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101896","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101896","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"101896"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144158574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: To ascertain outcome differences between human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated and non-HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma within an integrated healthcare system.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patients aged 18 to 90 years diagnosed with invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma from 2011 to 2017 using our institution's cancer registry. Demographic and clinical variables were abstracted from records. Five-year overall survival and progression-free survival were assessed for HPV-associated and non-HPV-associated cancer types. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests compared categorical, while Wilcoxon rank-sum tests analyzed continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier curves compared 5-year survival between groups.
Results: Among 144 patients, 34 (24%) had non-HPV-associated and 110 (76%) had HPV-associated cancers. Patients with non-HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma had worse 5-year progression-free survival (72% vs 88%, p = .03) and overall survival (75% vs 92%, p < .01). Non-HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma was more likely to be diagnosed at older ages (median 54 years vs 42 years, p < .01). A high percentage of early-stage diagnoses were observed (74% of non-HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma and 86% of HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma were diagnosed at stage I).
Conclusions: While 5-year survival was worse in non-HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma, differences were less pronounced than previously reported, potentially due to the high percentage of early-stage diagnoses, suggesting that stage remains the most important prognostic factor.
{"title":"Survival in human papillomavirus and non-human papillomavirus-associated invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma: outcomes in a large, integrated healthcare system.","authors":"Grace Williams, Ameek Bindra, Deanna Fink, Miranda Ritterman Weintraub, Christine Garcia","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102683","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102683","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To ascertain outcome differences between human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated and non-HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma within an integrated healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined patients aged 18 to 90 years diagnosed with invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma from 2011 to 2017 using our institution's cancer registry. Demographic and clinical variables were abstracted from records. Five-year overall survival and progression-free survival were assessed for HPV-associated and non-HPV-associated cancer types. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests compared categorical, while Wilcoxon rank-sum tests analyzed continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier curves compared 5-year survival between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 144 patients, 34 (24%) had non-HPV-associated and 110 (76%) had HPV-associated cancers. Patients with non-HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma had worse 5-year progression-free survival (72% vs 88%, p = .03) and overall survival (75% vs 92%, p < .01). Non-HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma was more likely to be diagnosed at older ages (median 54 years vs 42 years, p < .01). A high percentage of early-stage diagnoses were observed (74% of non-HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma and 86% of HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma were diagnosed at stage I).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While 5-year survival was worse in non-HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma, differences were less pronounced than previously reported, potentially due to the high percentage of early-stage diagnoses, suggesting that stage remains the most important prognostic factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"102683"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145318231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-12DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102728
Schawanya K Rattanapitoon, Nav La, Nathkapach K Rattanapitoon
{"title":"Correspondence on \"Psychophysical and social impact of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in China: a cross-sectional study\" by Ha Xinyu et al.","authors":"Schawanya K Rattanapitoon, Nav La, Nathkapach K Rattanapitoon","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102728","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102728","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"102728"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145426739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102780
Ka Chun Leung, Frank Chi Sing Wong
{"title":"Reply to Correspondence on \"Retrospective study of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced surgically inoperable endometrial carcinoma\" by Leung et al.","authors":"Ka Chun Leung, Frank Chi Sing Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102780","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102780","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"102780"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145633272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-11DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102790
Lois J Eva, Marilyn Boo, Susan M Bigby, Lynn Sadler
Objective: To inform follow-up protocols, we investigated differences in incidence, number, and timing of recurrence by site between human papillomavirus (HPV)-Independent and HPV-associated vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.
Methods: A retrospective clinicopathological single-institution cohort study was conducted of 471 patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma between 1990 and 2020. Tumors were classified as HPV-independent or HPV-associated, and the number, site, and time to recurrence were compared. Kaplan-Meier curves were developed for recurrence-free survival by stage, disease-specific survival by recurrence site, and cumulative incidence of recurrence for each tumor type.
Results: A total of 471 consecutive vulvar squamous cell carcinomas were identified during the study period; 251 HPV-independent and 208 HPV-associated, with 12 tumors unable to be classified. The median follow-up time was 41 months (range; 0-326). The median time to first recurrence was 22 months for HPV-independent and 43.5 months for HPV-associated (p = .014). In all-stage cancers, any type of recurrence occurred in 38.2% HPV-independent and 8.7% HPV-associated cases (p < .001). The cumulative recurrence rate (any site) for HPV-independent tumors at 5 years was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37% to 52%) and 7% (95% CI 4% to 13%) for HPV-associated tumors. Local recurrence occurred in 29.5% of HPV-independent and 7.7% HPV-associated cases (p < .001), groin recurrence in 14.3% of HPV-independent and 1.4% of HPV-associated cases (p < .001), and distant recurrence in 8.4% of HPV-independent and 2.4% of HPV-associated cases (p = .006). HPV- independent tumors had a significantly higher number of multiple recurrences (18.7% vs 1.9%, p < .001). Following a first local recurrence, disease-specific survival was 86% (95% CI 33% to 98%) at both 3 and 5 years for HPV-associated tumors, compared with 61% (95% CI 47% to 73%) at 3 years and 48% (95% CI 33% to 62%) at 5 years for HPV-independent tumors.
Conclusions: HPV-independent tumors have a 4.4-fold increased risk of any type of recurrence, with the first recurrence occurring 21 months earlier and with ongoing lifelong risk. Surveillance could be tailored by HPV status, extended for HPV-independent and reduced or patient-initiated for HPV-associated tumors.
目的:研究不依赖人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)的外阴鳞状细胞癌和HPV相关的外阴鳞状细胞癌在不同部位的发病率、数量和复发时间的差异,为随访方案提供信息。方法:对1990年至2020年471例外阴鳞状细胞癌患者进行回顾性临床病理单机构队列研究。将肿瘤分为hpv非依赖型和hpv相关型,比较肿瘤的数量、部位和复发时间。Kaplan-Meier曲线绘制了不同分期的无复发生存率、不同复发部位的疾病特异性生存率以及每种肿瘤类型的累积复发率。结果:在研究期间共发现471例连续外阴鳞状细胞癌;251例与hpv无关,208例与hpv相关,12例肿瘤无法分类。中位随访时间为41个月(范围:0-326)。hpv独立组到首次复发的中位时间为22个月,hpv相关组为43.5个月(p = 0.014)。在所有分期的癌症中,任何类型的复发发生在38.2%的hpv无关病例和8.7%的hpv相关病例中(p < 0.001)。不依赖hpv的肿瘤5年累积复发率(任何部位)为44%(95%可信区间[CI] 37%至52%),hpv相关肿瘤为7%(95%可信区间[CI] 4%至13%)。29.5%的hpv独立病例和7.7%的hpv相关病例出现局部复发(p < 0.001), 14.3%的hpv独立病例和1.4%的hpv相关病例出现腹股沟复发(p < 0.001), 8.4%的hpv独立病例和2.4%的hpv相关病例出现远处复发(p = 0.006)。HPV非依赖型肿瘤的多次复发率明显高于HPV非依赖型肿瘤(18.7% vs 1.9%, p < 0.001)。首次局部复发后,hpv相关肿瘤3年和5年的疾病特异性生存率为86% (95% CI 33%至98%),而hpv非依赖性肿瘤3年和5年的疾病特异性生存率分别为61% (95% CI 47%至73%)和48% (95% CI 33%至62%)。结论:hpv非依赖性肿瘤任何类型复发的风险增加4.4倍,首次复发发生在21个月前,并且具有持续的终身风险。监测可以根据HPV状态进行调整,扩展到HPV非依赖性和减少或患者发起的HPV相关肿瘤。
{"title":"Patterns of recurrence and implications for follow-up in human papillomavirus-associated versus human papillomavirus-independent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Lois J Eva, Marilyn Boo, Susan M Bigby, Lynn Sadler","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102790","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102790","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To inform follow-up protocols, we investigated differences in incidence, number, and timing of recurrence by site between human papillomavirus (HPV)-Independent and HPV-associated vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective clinicopathological single-institution cohort study was conducted of 471 patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma between 1990 and 2020. Tumors were classified as HPV-independent or HPV-associated, and the number, site, and time to recurrence were compared. Kaplan-Meier curves were developed for recurrence-free survival by stage, disease-specific survival by recurrence site, and cumulative incidence of recurrence for each tumor type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 471 consecutive vulvar squamous cell carcinomas were identified during the study period; 251 HPV-independent and 208 HPV-associated, with 12 tumors unable to be classified. The median follow-up time was 41 months (range; 0-326). The median time to first recurrence was 22 months for HPV-independent and 43.5 months for HPV-associated (p = .014). In all-stage cancers, any type of recurrence occurred in 38.2% HPV-independent and 8.7% HPV-associated cases (p < .001). The cumulative recurrence rate (any site) for HPV-independent tumors at 5 years was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37% to 52%) and 7% (95% CI 4% to 13%) for HPV-associated tumors. Local recurrence occurred in 29.5% of HPV-independent and 7.7% HPV-associated cases (p < .001), groin recurrence in 14.3% of HPV-independent and 1.4% of HPV-associated cases (p < .001), and distant recurrence in 8.4% of HPV-independent and 2.4% of HPV-associated cases (p = .006). HPV- independent tumors had a significantly higher number of multiple recurrences (18.7% vs 1.9%, p < .001). Following a first local recurrence, disease-specific survival was 86% (95% CI 33% to 98%) at both 3 and 5 years for HPV-associated tumors, compared with 61% (95% CI 47% to 73%) at 3 years and 48% (95% CI 33% to 62%) at 5 years for HPV-independent tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HPV-independent tumors have a 4.4-fold increased risk of any type of recurrence, with the first recurrence occurring 21 months earlier and with ongoing lifelong risk. Surveillance could be tailored by HPV status, extended for HPV-independent and reduced or patient-initiated for HPV-associated tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"36 1","pages":"102790"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145668259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-31DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102778
Adéla Richtárová, Martina Borčinová, Kristýna Hlinecká, Pavel Dundr, Filip Frühauf, Zdeňka Lisá, Veronika Vaisová, Michal Mára
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of Tru-Cut biopsy as a complementary diagnostic tool in the pre-operative evaluation of sonographically atypical myometrial lesions in patients scheduled for uterine surgery. Secondary objectives included determining the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of Tru-Cut biopsy in pre-operative tumor characterization and patient's perceived peri-procedural pain.
Methods: In this pilot study, all consecutive patients aged ≥18 years with atypical myometrial lesions based on ultrasonography referred to our institution's Centre of Minimally Invasive Surgery between June 2022 and June 2023 underwent pre-operative trans-vaginal or trans-cervical ultrasound-guided Tru-Cut biopsy, followed by surgical treatment. Samples were considered adequate if histologic tumor typing was possible. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by comparing Tru-Cut biopsy histology with final post-operative histology.
Results: Of 39 patients who underwent Tru-Cut biopsy, 27 (69.2%) were diagnosed with conventional leiomyoma, 9 (23.1%) with benign atypical myometrial lesion, 1 (2.6%) with smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential, and 2 (5.1%) had inadequate samples. The median pain score immediately post-Tru-Cut biopsy was 4 (interquartile range; 3-5), with no pain reported 24 hours later. Complications occurred in 2 patients (5.2%): 1 required hospitalization for collapse and another underwent laparoscopic intervention for abdominal bleeding. Among the 37 adequate samples, Tru-Cut biopsy findings were concordant with final histology in 34 cases (diagnostic accuracy 91.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 78.7 to 97.2). Tru-Cut biopsy sensitivity and specificity were 88.9% (95% CI 56.5 to 98.0) and 92.9% (95% CI 77.4 to 98.0), respectively.
Conclusions: This pilot study indicates that Tru-Cut biopsy is a feasible, safe, and accurate method for pre-operative assessment of atypical myometrial lesions, providing histologically adequate samples for diagnostic evaluation. Larger studies are warranted to validate these results.
{"title":"Pre-surgical Tru-Cut biopsy of sonographically atypical myometrial lesions: A prospective pilot study.","authors":"Adéla Richtárová, Martina Borčinová, Kristýna Hlinecká, Pavel Dundr, Filip Frühauf, Zdeňka Lisá, Veronika Vaisová, Michal Mára","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102778","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102778","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of Tru-Cut biopsy as a complementary diagnostic tool in the pre-operative evaluation of sonographically atypical myometrial lesions in patients scheduled for uterine surgery. Secondary objectives included determining the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of Tru-Cut biopsy in pre-operative tumor characterization and patient's perceived peri-procedural pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pilot study, all consecutive patients aged ≥18 years with atypical myometrial lesions based on ultrasonography referred to our institution's Centre of Minimally Invasive Surgery between June 2022 and June 2023 underwent pre-operative trans-vaginal or trans-cervical ultrasound-guided Tru-Cut biopsy, followed by surgical treatment. Samples were considered adequate if histologic tumor typing was possible. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by comparing Tru-Cut biopsy histology with final post-operative histology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 39 patients who underwent Tru-Cut biopsy, 27 (69.2%) were diagnosed with conventional leiomyoma, 9 (23.1%) with benign atypical myometrial lesion, 1 (2.6%) with smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential, and 2 (5.1%) had inadequate samples. The median pain score immediately post-Tru-Cut biopsy was 4 (interquartile range; 3-5), with no pain reported 24 hours later. Complications occurred in 2 patients (5.2%): 1 required hospitalization for collapse and another underwent laparoscopic intervention for abdominal bleeding. Among the 37 adequate samples, Tru-Cut biopsy findings were concordant with final histology in 34 cases (diagnostic accuracy 91.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 78.7 to 97.2). Tru-Cut biopsy sensitivity and specificity were 88.9% (95% CI 56.5 to 98.0) and 92.9% (95% CI 77.4 to 98.0), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study indicates that Tru-Cut biopsy is a feasible, safe, and accurate method for pre-operative assessment of atypical myometrial lesions, providing histologically adequate samples for diagnostic evaluation. Larger studies are warranted to validate these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"36 1","pages":"102778"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-05DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102782
Houssein El Hajj, Phuong Lien Tran, Virginie Collin-Bund, Henri Azais, Guillaume Babin, Francois Margueritte, Yohan Kerbage, Frederic Guyon, Sarah Betrian, Thomas Dabreteau, Cherif Akladios, Sébastien Gouy, Philippe Morice, Elise Deluche, Camille Grysole
Objective: To assess the knowledge, practices, and referral patterns of health care professionals and fertility preservation specialists regarding fertility preservation in gynecologic oncology in France.
Methods: In this cross sectional study, an electronic questionnaire was distributed between June 2023 and January 2024 to health care professionals in metropolitan and overseas territories. It included sections on demographics, fertility preservation practices, and technical knowledge, with tailored sections for physicians who are specialists and non-specialists in reproductive medicine.
Results: Sixty-four professionals participated (mean experience: 12 years); 65.6% (42/64) were gynecologic surgeons, and 18.8% (12/64) were specialists in reproductive medicine. Among non-specialists (52/64), 82.7% (43/52) routinely discussed fertility with patients of childbearing age, and 94.2% (49/52) had referred patients for fertility preservation. The mean knowledge score was 1.4/6. Only 23.1% (12/52) reported having written materials for patients, and 65.4% (34/52) indicated that no fertility specialist was present at multidisciplinary meetings. All reproductive medicine specialists (n = 12) reported access to oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation, but 83.3% (10/12) believed patients were under-referred. They emphasized the need for systematic discussions of fertility preservation in multidisciplinary settings and highlighted risks associated with ovarian stimulation and tissue reimplantation. The upper age limit for oocyte cryopreservation was generally under 40 years. Pregnancy outcomes following fertility preservation were limited, primarily in cases of borderline ovarian tumors.
Conclusions: Fertility preservation is recognized as a critical component of gynecologic oncology care, but significant gaps remain in knowledge, referrals, and integration into multidisciplinary care. Strengthening collaboration between oncology and fertility teams, standardizing care pathways, and enhancing education for health care providers are essential steps to improving access and outcomes for patients.
{"title":"Fertility preservation in gynecologic oncology: evaluating knowledge, practices, and barriers among French healthcare providers.","authors":"Houssein El Hajj, Phuong Lien Tran, Virginie Collin-Bund, Henri Azais, Guillaume Babin, Francois Margueritte, Yohan Kerbage, Frederic Guyon, Sarah Betrian, Thomas Dabreteau, Cherif Akladios, Sébastien Gouy, Philippe Morice, Elise Deluche, Camille Grysole","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102782","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102782","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the knowledge, practices, and referral patterns of health care professionals and fertility preservation specialists regarding fertility preservation in gynecologic oncology in France.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross sectional study, an electronic questionnaire was distributed between June 2023 and January 2024 to health care professionals in metropolitan and overseas territories. It included sections on demographics, fertility preservation practices, and technical knowledge, with tailored sections for physicians who are specialists and non-specialists in reproductive medicine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four professionals participated (mean experience: 12 years); 65.6% (42/64) were gynecologic surgeons, and 18.8% (12/64) were specialists in reproductive medicine. Among non-specialists (52/64), 82.7% (43/52) routinely discussed fertility with patients of childbearing age, and 94.2% (49/52) had referred patients for fertility preservation. The mean knowledge score was 1.4/6. Only 23.1% (12/52) reported having written materials for patients, and 65.4% (34/52) indicated that no fertility specialist was present at multidisciplinary meetings. All reproductive medicine specialists (n = 12) reported access to oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation, but 83.3% (10/12) believed patients were under-referred. They emphasized the need for systematic discussions of fertility preservation in multidisciplinary settings and highlighted risks associated with ovarian stimulation and tissue reimplantation. The upper age limit for oocyte cryopreservation was generally under 40 years. Pregnancy outcomes following fertility preservation were limited, primarily in cases of borderline ovarian tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fertility preservation is recognized as a critical component of gynecologic oncology care, but significant gaps remain in knowledge, referrals, and integration into multidisciplinary care. Strengthening collaboration between oncology and fertility teams, standardizing care pathways, and enhancing education for health care providers are essential steps to improving access and outcomes for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"36 1","pages":"102782"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Gliomatosis peritonei (GP) is a rare condition characterized by peritoneal implants of mature glial tissue, macroscopically resembling peritoneal carcinomatosis. It is usually associated with ovarian mature or immature teratoma. To describe the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of cases with GP.
Methods: Multi-center retrospective study of patients diagnosed with ovarian teratoma and GP between 2000 and 2023. Non-gynecological GP cases were excluded.
Results: Overall, 23 patients were included. Median age was 25 years (range; 10-38). Median ovarian tumor size was 19 cm (range; 6-35). The main symptom was abdominal pain (n = 13). Histology was mature teratoma in 13% (n = 3), and immature teratoma in 87% (n = 20) of cases, of which 90% (n = 18) was pure teratomas and 10% (n = 2) was mixed with yolk sac tumor. Overall, 60% were grade 3. Fertility-sparing surgery was performed in 87% (n = 20, of them 18 underwent unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and 2 cystectomy ± further biopsies) without macroscopic residual disease in 91% (n = 21), and 78% (n = 18) were diagnosed at stage I. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given in 7 cases, only with grade 2 or more. Twelve women relapsed after a median of 43 months. However, only 2 relapses had immature teratoma components. Three patients had a second relapse after a median of 9 months. Over a median follow-up of 81 months (range; 7-270), the entire cohort remained alive and 3 live births were reported.
Conclusions: GP is mostly associated with high-grade early-stage immature teratoma in young patients. Resection of peritoneal implants is crucial for the accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment planning. Relapses are mostly mature, therefore, offering fertility-sparing treatment in pre-menopausal cases could be considered.
{"title":"Gliomatosis peritonei with ovarian teratoma: an international multicenter case series.","authors":"Majdi Imterat, Nicolò Bizzarri, Shira Stern, Giacomo Guidi, Benny Brandt, Massimo Criscione, Liat Matan, Davide Arrigo, Tal Keidar Haran, Carolina Sassu, Diana Prus, Matteo Bruno, Tamar Perri, Anna Fagotti","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102720","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102720","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gliomatosis peritonei (GP) is a rare condition characterized by peritoneal implants of mature glial tissue, macroscopically resembling peritoneal carcinomatosis. It is usually associated with ovarian mature or immature teratoma. To describe the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of cases with GP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multi-center retrospective study of patients diagnosed with ovarian teratoma and GP between 2000 and 2023. Non-gynecological GP cases were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 23 patients were included. Median age was 25 years (range; 10-38). Median ovarian tumor size was 19 cm (range; 6-35). The main symptom was abdominal pain (n = 13). Histology was mature teratoma in 13% (n = 3), and immature teratoma in 87% (n = 20) of cases, of which 90% (n = 18) was pure teratomas and 10% (n = 2) was mixed with yolk sac tumor. Overall, 60% were grade 3. Fertility-sparing surgery was performed in 87% (n = 20, of them 18 underwent unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and 2 cystectomy ± further biopsies) without macroscopic residual disease in 91% (n = 21), and 78% (n = 18) were diagnosed at stage I. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given in 7 cases, only with grade 2 or more. Twelve women relapsed after a median of 43 months. However, only 2 relapses had immature teratoma components. Three patients had a second relapse after a median of 9 months. Over a median follow-up of 81 months (range; 7-270), the entire cohort remained alive and 3 live births were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GP is mostly associated with high-grade early-stage immature teratoma in young patients. Resection of peritoneal implants is crucial for the accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment planning. Relapses are mostly mature, therefore, offering fertility-sparing treatment in pre-menopausal cases could be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"36 1","pages":"102720"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145556801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}