International Journal of Gynecological Cancer最新文献

Cervical cancer remains a major global health burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where access to advanced imaging and treatment is often limited. While magnetic resonance imaging is considered the gold standard for loco-regional staging, recent evidence supports transvaginal/transrectal ultrasound as an accurate and cost-effective alternative when performed by trained sonographers and clinicians. Its portability and affordability make ultrasound particularly valuable in resource-constrained settings. In this paper, we present a pragmatic diagnostic and clinical strategy for managing cervical cancer in contexts where magnetic resonance imaging, sentinel lymph node mapping, and radiotherapy are not available. Building on a structured checklist of ultrasound-based parameters, we propose simple, tailored pathways to guide decisions regarding upfront surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pelvic exenteration, or palliative chemotherapy and supportive care. The approach emphasizes accurate staging through transvaginal/transrectal ultrasound combined with transabdominal scanning, allowing identification of tumor size, local extension, lymph node status, and clear contraindications to surgery. By promoting ultrasound as a reliable tool for loco-regional staging and treatment planning, we aim to improve access to cervical cancer care in low- and middle-income countries and to lay the groundwork for future prospective multi-center studies.

Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the proactive or real-time assessment of patient reported outcomes in studies involving patients with ovarian cancer undergoing systemic therapy.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched (from database inception until February 2022), and prospective ovarian cancer studies (experimental or observational) that incorporated patient reported outcomes, including quality of life, were included. The primary objective was to assess the ratio of studies incorporating real-time use of patient reported outcomes among those studies performing patient reported outcomes. A secondary objective was to describe the patient reported outcome reporting. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist was followed. Descriptive statistics were used.

Results: 3071 articles were screened, with 117 included in the final analysis. Studies were published between 1990 and 2022, and consisted of 35 735 patients (median 140 patients per study; interquartile range 58-415). Median time from patient enrollment initiation to study publication was 7 years (range 1-15). Most studies were experimental/clinical trials (n=93, 79%) followed by observational (n=23, 20%). Therapeutic strategies were assessed in 98% (91/93) of experimental studies, most frequently chemotherapy (n=53, 58%), followed by antiangiogenics or poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (n=8, 9%, each). Patient reported outcomes were the primary endpoint in 7.5% (7/93) and 83% (19/23) of experimental and observational studies, respectively. The ratio of real-time patient reported outcomes assessment/ evaluation was 0.9% (1/117).

Conclusions: Completion of patient reported outcome questionnaires involves time and effort for patients with ovarian cancer. Responses to these questionnaires were only assessed in real time in <1% of analyzed studies. Efforts should be made to incorporate proactive assessment of patient reported outcomes to optimize patient care and safety.

Objective: Epithelioid and myxoid types represent uterine leiomyosarcoma variants, and their clinico-pathologic characteristics and survival outcomes have been under-studied because of their rarity. The objective of this study was to assess clinico-pathologic characteristics and survival associated with uterine leiomyosarcoma variants.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study queried the Commission-on-Cancer's National Cancer Database. The study population included 7410 patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma, including conventional, epithelioid, and myxoid types, who had primary hysterectomy from 2010 to 2022. Demographic characteristics were assessed using descriptive analysis; overall survival was assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Results: Epithelioid and myxoid types were reported in 478 (6.5%) and 327 (4.4%) patients, respectively. The proportion of the epithelioid variant increased from 5.5% in 2010-2014 to 7.8% in 2019-2022 (p = .005). The epithelioid type was associated with higher rates of lympho-vascular space invasion (33.1% vs 22.0%-23.7%) and nodal metastasis (6.9% vs 3.4%-3.6%), whereas the myxoid type was associated with a higher rate of stage I disease (64.5% vs 56.1%-58.7%) (all, p < .05). Compared with the conventional type, the epithelioid type was associated with improved overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 to 0.99) including stage I (aHR 0.75, 95%CI 0.60 to 0.93) and stage III (aHR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.91) disease; the myxoid type was also associated with improved overall survival (aHR 0.68, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.82) including stage I (aHR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.82) and stage IV (aHR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.88) disease. Across all three types, larger tumor size, lympho-vascular invasion, and higher stage were associated with decreased overall survival, with the survival impact of larger tumor size being more prominent in variants. For stage II to IV epithelioid type, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival (aHR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.64).

Conclusions: The results of this cohort study suggest that uterine leiomyosarcoma variants (epithelioid and myxoid) exhibit distinct histopathologic characteristics and survival compared with the conventional type. These data also endorse the importance of accurate diagnosis, research inclusion criteria, and development of collaborative networks.

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, with rising incidence and high recurrence rates. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) benefit patients with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors, but options remain limited for those with mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) disease. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), a genomic instability phenotype, has emerged as a therapeutic target. Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are being investigated in endometrial cancer, with studies exploring whether HRD predicts response, particularly in combination with ICIs or chemotherapy. This review examines HRD in endometrial cancer, focusing on its molecular basis, clinical implications, and emerging therapeutic strategies. HRD occurs in a sub-set of endometrial cancers, particularly non-endometrioid sub-types, and is linked to genomic instability and platinum sensitivity. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular classification has improved understanding of HRD prevalence across sub-types. HRD testing remains challenging due to a lack of standardization, with current methods including genomic-scar assays, next-generation sequencing, and functional assays. Clinical trials, such as DUO-E and RUBY-2, suggest that PARPi combined with ICIs or chemotherapy may improve outcomes in pMMR tumors, whereas PARPi monotherapy offers limited benefits. Resistance to PARPi is common, driven by the restoration of homologous recombination repair, replication fork stabilization, and drug efflux. HRD is a promising biomarker and therapeutic target in endometrial cancer. Evidence supports the integration of PARPi for select populations, although further research is needed to refine testing, optimize patient selection, and overcome resistance. Future trials should prioritize predictive biomarkers and novel combinations to maximize the benefits of PARPi in HRD endometrial cancer.

Objective: We sought to describe the oncologic outcomes of isolated serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas compared to an intraepithelial carcinoma found concurrently with microscopic high-grade serous carcinoma among patients with hereditary predisposition to ovarian cancer who underwent risk-reducing surgery.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 32 high-risk patients with BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C/D, BRIP1, or PALB2 pathogenic variants who were diagnosed with either isolated serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma or concurrent serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and microscopic high-grade serous carcinoma following risk-reducing surgery between January 2006 and December 2023. Our population included patients who underwent surgery at our institution as well as those who had surgery elsewhere, but sought second opinions, follow-up care, or treatment at our institution. Data were gathered from medical and pathologic records, and pathologic specimens were re-reviewed by a gynecologic pathologist. Standard statistical methods were used to describe oncologic outcomes per group.

Results: Among 32 patients in the cohort, we found that 68.7% had a pathologic diagnosis of an incidental serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma, while 31.3% had a pathologic diagnosis of microscopic high-grade serous carcinoma with associated serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma. Notably, two patients (9%) with isolated serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma developed primary peritoneal carcinoma within a median of 29 months after surgery. One-third of patients with microscopic cancer experienced recurrence despite receiving standard staging surgery and chemotherapy for early-stage disease. Most of the patients in the cohort were older at the time of risk-reducing surgery than recommended for their pathologic variant.

Conclusions: The study supports the critical need for timely risk-reducing surgery in high-risk populations, as well as a comprehensive pathologic examination along with vigilant post-operative surveillance. Consensus guidelines for management of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma are necessary to identify a group of patients at higher risk of progression to primary peritoneal carcinoma and optimize patient care.