International Journal of Gynecological Cancer最新文献

Objectives: We have previously shown that DNA based, single test molecular classification by next generation sequencing (NGS) (Proactive Molecular risk classifier for Endometrial cancer (ProMisE) NGS) is highly concordant with the original ProMisE classifier and maintains prognostic value in endometrial cancer. Our aim was to validate ProMisE NGS in an independent cohort and assess the performance of ProMisE NGS in real world clinical practice to address if there were any practical challenges or learning points for implementation.

Methods: We evaluated DNA extracted from an external research cohort of 211 endometrial cancer cases diagnosed in 2016 from Germany, Switzerland, and Austria, across seven European centers, comparing standard molecular classification (NGS for POLE status, immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair and p53) with ProMisE NGS (NGS for POLE and TP53, microsatellite instability assay) for concordance metrics and Kaplan-Meier survival statistics across molecular subtypes. In parallel, we assessed all patients who had undergone a new NGS based molecular classification test (n=334) comparing molecular subtype assignment with the original ProMisE classifier.

Results: A total of 545 endometrial cancers were compared. Prognostic differences in progression free, disease specific, and overall survival between the four molecular subtypes were observed for the NGS classifier, recapitulating the survival curves of original ProMisE. In 28 of 545 (5%) discordant cases (8/211 (4%) in the validation set, 20/334 (6%) in the real world cohort), molecular subtype was able to be definitively assigned in all, based on review of the histopathological features and/or additional immunohistochemistry. DNA based molecular classification identified twice as many 'multiple classifier' endometrial cancers; 37 of 545 (7%) compared with 20 of 545 (4%) with original ProMisE.

Conclusion: External validation confirmed that single test, DNA based molecular classification was highly concordant (95%) with original ProMisE classification, with prognostic value maintained, representing an acceptable alternative for clinical practice. Careful consideration of reasons for discordance and knowledge of how to correctly assign multiple classifier endometrial cancers is imperative for implementation.

Objective: This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to compare survival outcomes and adverse events between early and late initiation of niraparib maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.

Methods: We included patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer who showed a complete or partial response to frontline platinum-based chemotherapy and received niraparib maintenance therapy between October 2019 and December 2022. The primary endpoint was the HR for progression-free survival based on the median initiation interval, which was defined as the duration between the completion of chemotherapy and commencement of maintenance therapy. The secondary endpoint was the comparison of progression-free survival at another time point that determined the interval that maximized the difference between the survival curves of the two groups using the Contal and O'Quigley method.

Results: This analysis included 146 patients who received niraparib maintenance therapy. The median age was 58 years (IQR 50-63.3). The median initiation interval was 8.4 (IQR 5.7-8.9) weeks. After adjusting for prognostic factors for progression-free survival identified through multivariable analysis, early initiation (≤8 weeks) of niraparib was associated with significantly better progression-free survival (HR=0.57; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.99; p=0.047). Furthermore, the initiation interval that maximized the difference in progression-free survival was 6 weeks. Multivariable analysis revealed that early initiation (≤6 weeks) of niraparib significantly increased progression-free survival (HR=0.37; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.76; p=0.007). The rate of treatment discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events was higher (12.5% versus. 2.8%; p=0.036) in patients receiving niraparib within 6 weeks than those treated later, with no significant effect in those initiating treatment within 8 weeks.

Conclusion: Early initiation of niraparib maintenance therapy within 8 weeks of chemotherapy completion improved progression-free survival, with further benefits observed with treatment within 6 weeks in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.

Objectives: Maintenance therapies, including poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and/or bevacizumab, have substantially improved the prognosis of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Owing to the variability in treatment strategies across Europe, a Delphi study was conducted among European experts to understand the heterogeneity of clinical practice and identify key factors driving maintenance treatment decisions for advanced ovarian cancer.

Methods: A pragmatic literature review was conducted to identify key questions regarding maintenance treatment strategies in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Utilizing a Delphi methodology, consensus was assessed among a panel of 16 experts using a questionnaire based on results of the pragmatic literature review.

Results: Panelists agreed that BRCA mutation and homologous recombination status should be assessed in parallel at diagnosis, and that first-line platinum chemotherapy may be initiated concurrently. There was a consensus that alternative homologous recombination deficiency tests are acceptable provided they are clinically validated. Panelists agreed that Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and CA-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM) scores can help assess tumor chemosensitivity and guide treatment-related decisions. Panelists defined high-risk disease as International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV disease or stage III with residual disease after initial/interval cytoreduction. Risk of disease progression was a key determinant of choice between PARP inhibitor, bevacizumab, or both in combination, as maintenance therapy in advanced ovarian cancer.

Conclusions: Key drivers for selecting advanced ovarian cancer maintenance treatments include tumor mutational status as a key biomarker and clinician perception of the risk for early disease progression.

Objective: There are no data, and thus no consensus, on the optimal duration of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy for exceptional responders (here defined as progression-free for 5 years or longer) with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The current licence is to continue PARP inhibitors until progression or toxicity; however, international practice varies considerably. The risks of late progression and late-onset myeloid malignancies, defined as occurring beyond 5 years of PARP inhibition, are unknown. This study aims to examine the practice patterns and opinions regarding the management and surveillance protocols of exceptional responders with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Methods: An online international survey of experts from June 2023 to June 2024 was carried out, disseminated at Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup meetings and by Chairs of Cooperative Groups.

Results: 210 responses were received from 26 countries including Australia (27 respondents), Germany (24), the UK (21), the Netherlands (16), France (13), Spain (12), Canada (12), Italy (11), Japan (11), and other countries (63). Most respondents did not have institutional or trials group guidelines regarding duration of PARP inhibitors (154, 73.3%). For the minority with guidelines, recommendations varied: 1 year (2), 2 years (13), 3 years (4), and indefinite treatment (22). Individual practice varied considerably for those without guidelines: most (116, 76.3%) recommended ≥5 years of PARP inhibition, of which 73 (48.0%) recommended indefinite PARP inhibition. Sixty-six respondents (31.4%) reported having patients with late progression and 46 (22.0%) had cases with late-onset myeloid malignancies. Surveillance practices varied widely across all respondents.

Conclusions: This international survey highlights the diverse practice variations and disparate views on the optimal duration of maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors in platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The responses suggest a notable risk of late progression and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia among exceptional responders which needs confirmation. Detailed individual patient data is required to draw more reliable conclusions; another study is underway addressing this.

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) is increasingly used for surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.

Objective: To estimate the effect and cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an SLN algorithm for surgical staging in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial carcinoma compared with lymphadenectomy.

Methods: We performed a model-based, cost-effectiveness analysis using primary data from a tertiary referral hospital that included 829 patients with endometrial carcinoma undergoing surgical staging. We quantified the health and economic outcomes from two time periods, before and after implementation of the SLN algorithm by robotic surgery. Costs were measured directly from the hospital's financial department, while long-term health outcomes were estimated using self-reported lymphedema and health-related quality-of-life among survivors. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate uncertainty.

Results: We projected that the SLN implementation period, predominately reflecting use of robotic SLN, simultaneously improved health outcomes (0.08 incremental quality-adjusted life-years) and lowered costs (US$1051) compared with the prior period involving robotic or open lymphadenectomy. SLN remained more beneficial and less costly across key sensitivity analyses-namely, varying the cost of the robotic platform, surgical equipment, number of yearly robotic procedures, percentage of robotic procedures versus percentage of laparotomies, length of stay, and lymphedema development. After 1000 simulations of the model, SLN implementation provided greater health benefits for lower costs (ie, cost saving) in 89% of simulations.

Conclusion: Implementation of an SLN algorithm in the staging of intermediate- and high-risk endometrial carcinoma improved health outcomes for lower costs compared with lymphadenectomy. Cost-effectiveness could further improve by continuing to increase the proportion of robotic procedures.

Objectives: In patients undergoing interval tumor reductive surgery, a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may limit available tumor for homologous recombination deficiency testing. The objective of this study was to assess whether the chemotherapy response score predicts homologous recombination status.

Methods: We identified patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (diagnosed January 2019 to 20 June 2023) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, underwent interval surgery, and for whom a chemotherapy response score was reported (1=no or minimal tumor response, 2=appreciable tumor response, 3=complete or near complete response with no residual tumor). Comparisons were made using ANOVAs or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and χ² or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.

Results: The cohort consisted of 234 patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent interval surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of those who underwent germline genetic testing, 22% (51/232) had a pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and of those with tumors sent for testing, 65% were found to have homologous recombination deficiency (66/146). With increasing chemotherapy response scores, a higher likelihood of a complete gross resection was observed (50% (chemotherapy response score, CRS 1) vs 77% (CRS 2) vs 88% (CRS 3), p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, CRS 2 (adjusted odds ratio=3.28, 95% CI 1.12 to 9.60, p=0.03) and CRS 3 (5.83, 1.79 to 18.93, p=0.003) were independently associated with homologous recombination deficiency compared with CRS 1.

Conclusion: A positive response to chemotherapy at the time of interval tumor reductive surgery defined by the chemotherapy response score was associated with homologous recombination status and the likelihood of achieving a complete gross resection.