International Journal of Gynecological Cancer最新文献

Objective: This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to compare survival outcomes and adverse events between early and late initiation of niraparib maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.

Methods: We included patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer who showed a complete or partial response to frontline platinum-based chemotherapy and received niraparib maintenance therapy between October 2019 and December 2022. The primary endpoint was the HR for progression-free survival based on the median initiation interval, which was defined as the duration between the completion of chemotherapy and commencement of maintenance therapy. The secondary endpoint was the comparison of progression-free survival at another time point that determined the interval that maximized the difference between the survival curves of the two groups using the Contal and O'Quigley method.

Results: This analysis included 146 patients who received niraparib maintenance therapy. The median age was 58 years (IQR 50-63.3). The median initiation interval was 8.4 (IQR 5.7-8.9) weeks. After adjusting for prognostic factors for progression-free survival identified through multivariable analysis, early initiation (≤8 weeks) of niraparib was associated with significantly better progression-free survival (HR=0.57; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.99; p=0.047). Furthermore, the initiation interval that maximized the difference in progression-free survival was 6 weeks. Multivariable analysis revealed that early initiation (≤6 weeks) of niraparib significantly increased progression-free survival (HR=0.37; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.76; p=0.007). The rate of treatment discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events was higher (12.5% versus. 2.8%; p=0.036) in patients receiving niraparib within 6 weeks than those treated later, with no significant effect in those initiating treatment within 8 weeks.

Conclusion: Early initiation of niraparib maintenance therapy within 8 weeks of chemotherapy completion improved progression-free survival, with further benefits observed with treatment within 6 weeks in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.

Objective: Imaging for staging ovarian cancer is important to determine the extent of disease. The primary objective of this study was to compare gated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography coupled with computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) and standard CT scan with intravenous contrast to diagnose thoracic involvement in patients with advanced ovarian cancer prior to treatment. The secondary objective was to estimate changes in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and clinical management resulting from gated PET/CT.

Methods: The IMAGE trial is a non-randomized phase II clinical trial comparing standard CT scanning with gated PET/CT in diagnosing thoracic involvement in a non-selected group of patients with suspected ovarian cancer on a contrast CT scan. Three sets of PET images were obtained comprising an ungated 2 min whole body image, a static 7.5 min image of the upper abdomen and thorax, and a gated end-expiratory image over the upper abdomen and thorax. Images were evaluated for specificity, sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, and the proportion of patients with changes in FIGO stage and subsequent clinical management was compared between imaging techniques.

Results: A total of 84 patients were enrolled based on a standard CT scan, 67 of whom were eligible for gated PET/CT scans. Diagnostic accuracy with gated PET/CT was more than 80% for lesions in lung, liver, extra-abdominal sites, and pleura, but less than 50% for extra-abdominal lymph nodes. Compared with CT scan at baseline, 46% of patients who had 7.5 min gated PET/CT had disease upstaged from stage III to IV, and 8% had disease downstaged from stage IV to III. However, this led to a change of management in only 5% of patients.

Conclusions: Gated PET/CT enables upstaging; however, in our institution it altered clinical management only in a minority of patients.

Trial registration number: NCT02258165.

Objective: To evaluate the lymphatic-specific morbidity (specifically, lower extremity lymphedema) associated with laparoscopic management of early-stage endometrial cancer using the sentinel lymph node (SLN) algorithm by type of actual nodal assessment.

Methods: An ambispective study was conducted on consecutive patients surgically treated for apparent early-stage endometrial cancer who underwent laparoscopic staging according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network SLN algorithm at a single institution from January 2020 to August 2023. Data on patient characteristics, surgical details, and post-operative complications were collected. Lymphedema screening was performed using a validated questionnaire.

Results: A total of 239 patients were analyzed, with a questionnaire response rate of 85.4%. The study population was grouped based on actual surgical staging: hysterectomy+SLN (54.8%), hysterectomy+systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy (27.2%), and hysterectomy only (18%). The prevalence of lymphedema was significantly lower in the hysterectomy+SLN group compared with the hysterectomy+systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy group (21.4% vs 44.6%, p=0.003). Multivariable analysis showed a threefold increase in the risk of lymphedema for the hysterectomy+systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy group compared with the hysterectomy+SLN group: OR 3.11 (95% CI 1.47 to 6.58). No significant associations were found between lymphedema and other patient or tumor characteristics.

Conclusion: In the setting of a laparoscopic approach for early-stage endometrial cancer surgery, SLN mapping is associated with a significant reduction in lymphatic complications compared with a systematic lymph node dissection. Our findings provide additional evidence endorsing the adoption of SLN mapping during minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer. This technique ensures comparable diagnostic accuracy and also minimizes complications.

Objective: To analyze the association between the prognostic nutritional index and surgical morbidity in women with gynecologic cancers.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of women with ovarian, endometrial, or cervical cancer who underwent surgery between January 2013 and December 2020 at a cancer center. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records. The prognostic nutritional index was calculated during the immediate pre-operative period. Binomial logistic regression was conducted to identify the association of the prognostic nutritional index with the outcome of surgical complications after Clavien-Dindo classification, adjusting for confounding variables.

Results: A total of 1000 women were included: 114 (11.4%) were diagnosed with cervical cancer, 551 (55.1%) with ovarian cancer, and 335 (33.5%) with endometrial cancer. Patients with a prognostic nutritional index >40 had a decreased possibility of surgical complications (OR=0.39, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.52); basal blood hemoglobin, volume of surgical bleeding, operative time, and length of hospital stay were also explanatory factors. The prognostic nutritional index has a significant effect on patients with endometrial and cervical cancer, but conversely is not significant in patients with ovarian cancer.

Conclusion: The prognostic nutritional index is associated with surgical morbidity in endometrial and cervical cancers and thus can be a useful tool for predicting morbidity and guide pre-operative interventions in patients with gynecological cancers.

Background: There are no approved treatments specifically for low grade serous ovarian cancer; current standard of care treatment options are limited in efficacy and tolerability. The combination of avutometinib with defactinib has demonstrated efficacy and a consistent safety profile in two clinical trials in recurrent low grade serous ovarian cancer, and a lower discontinuation rate due to adverse events compared with historical rates for standard of care.

Primary objective: To compare the progression free survival of the combination of avutometinib with defactinib versus investigator's choice of treatment in patients with recurrent low grade serous ovarian cancer.

Study hypothesis: Combination treatment with avutometinib-defactinib will significantly improve progression free survival compared with investigator's choice of treatment in patients with recurrent low grade serous ovarian cancer.

Trial design: GOG-3097/ENGOT-ov81/GTG-UK/RAMP 301 is a phase 3, randomized, international, open label study designed to compare avutometinib with defactinib versus investigator's choice of treatment in patients with recurrent low grade serous ovarian cancer who have progressed on a previous platinum based therapy. On confirmation of disease progression using a blinded independent central review, patients on the investigator's choice of treatment arm may cross over to the avutometinib-defactinib arm.

Major inclusion/exclusion criteria: Patients must have recurrent low grade serous ovarian cancer (KRAS mutant or wild-type) and have documented progression (radiographic or clinical) or recurrence of low grade serous ovarian cancer after at least one platinum based chemotherapy regimen. Unlimited additional previous lines of therapy are allowed, including previous MEK/RAF inhibitor. Patients will be excluded if they have co-existing high grade ovarian cancer or had previous treatment with avutometinib, defactinib, or any other FAK inhibitor.

Primary endpoint: Progression free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, blinded-independent central review.

Sample size: Approximately 270 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either the combination avutometinib with defactinib arm (n~135) or the investigator's choice of treatment arm (n~135).

Estimated dates for completing accrual and presenting results: The estimated primary completion date of RAMP 301 is 2028, and the estimated study completion date is 2031.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06072781.

Objective: Ovarian cancer is characterized by late-stage diagnoses and poor prognosis. We aimed to identify factors that can inform prevention and early detection of ovarian cancer.

Methods: We used a data-driven machine learning approach to identify predictors of epithelial ovarian cancer from 2920 input features measured 12.6 years (IQR 11.9 to 13.3 years) before diagnoses. Analyses included 221 732 female participants in the UK Biobank without a history of cancer. During the follow-up 1441 women developed ovarian cancer. For factors that contributed to model prediction, we used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the association with ovarian cancer, with evidence for causality tested by Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses in the Ovarian Cancer Genetics Consortium (25 509 cases).

Results: Greater parity and ever-use of oral contraception were associated with lower ovarian cancer risk (ever vs never OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.84). After adjustment for established risk factors, greater height, weight, and greater red blood cell distribution width were associated with increased ovarian cancer risk, while higher aspartate aminotransferase levels and mean corpuscular volume were associated with lower risk. MR analyses confirmed observational associations with anthropometric/adiposity traits (eg, body fat percentage per standard deviation (SD); OR inverse-variance weighted (OR_IVW) 1.28, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.46) and aspartate aminotransferase (OR_IVW 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.98). MR also provided genetic evidence for a protective association of higher total serum protein on ovarian cancer, higher lymphocyte count on serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer, and greater forced expiratory volume in 1 s on serous ovarian cancer among other findings.

Conclusions: This study shows that certain risk factors for ovarian cancer are modifiable, suggesting that weight reduction and interventions to reduce the number of ovulations may provide potential for future prevention. We also identified blood biomarkers associated with ovarian cancer years before diagnoses, warranting further investigation.