Objective: To explore the effectiveness of HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein in detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and predicting disease outcomes in HPV 16/18-positive patients.
Methods: The present study was a cross-sectional study with a 2-year follow up. We collected 915 cervical exfoliated cell samples from patients who tested positive for HPV 16/18 in gynecologic clinics of three tertiary hospitals in Beijing from March 2021 to October 2022 for HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein testing. Subsequently, 2-year follow up of 408 patients with baseline histologic CIN1 or below were used to investigate the predictive role of HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein in determining HPV persistent infection and disease progression.
Results: The positivity rate of the HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein assay was 42.06% (249/592) in the inflammation/CIN 1 group and 85.45% (277/324) in the CIN2+ group. For CIN2+ detection, using the HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein assay combined with HPV 16/18 testing, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 85.45%, 57.94%, 52.57%, and 87.95%, respectively. During the 2-year follow up, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for predicting persistent HPV infection were 48.44%, 58.21%, 34.64%, and 71.18% in the baseline inflammation and CIN1 group.
Conclusions: As a triage method for high-grade CIN screening in HPV 16/18-positive patients, HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein demonstrated a relatively high NPV, making it suitable for clinical use in triaging HPV 16/18-positive cases and potentially reducing the colposcopic referral rate. HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein exhibited a preferably predictive value in determining HPV infection outcomes and disease progression.
Objective: The aim of the present study was to explore the relationship between the size of cesarean scar diverticulum (CSD) measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and adverse events during dilatation and curettage (D&C) procedure in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).
Methods: The MRI of 197 CSP patients from October 2019 to August 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The volume, area, and depth of CSD, residual myometrium thickness (RMT), and gestational sac diameter were recorded and tested for correlation with intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), and operation time and for any association with the intraoperative adverse events (intraoperative massive hemorrhage [39 cases] and D&C procedure failure [15 cases]). The Spearman test was used to characterize the correlation between the five MRI variables and both the EBL and operation time. The correlation between the five MRI variables and intraoperative adverse events was evaluated with student's t test and Mann-Whitney U test. Diagnostic power of the MRI variables was evaluated by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Results: The volume, area, and depth of CSD and gestational sac diameter were positively correlated with both EBL and operation time, with the CSD volume having the highest correlation with them (r = 0.543 and 0.461, respectively). Conversely, the RMT displayed a negative correlation with the EBL and operation time. All five MRI variables were significantly associated with both intraoperative massive hemorrhage and D&C failure (all P < 0.001). The CSD volume demonstrated the highest AUC for diagnosing intraoperative massive hemorrhage and D&C failure at 0.893 (95% CI: 0.82-0.92) and 0.901 (95% CI: 0.85-0.94), respectively. The optimal cutoff values for CSD volume in predicting massive hemorrhage and D&C failure were determined to be 5.41 and 8.92 cm3, respectively, with corresponding sensitivities/specificities of 92.31/74.68 and 93.33/82.42, respectively.
Conclusion: Quantifying the size of CSD based on preoperative MRI could aid in evaluating risk during D&C in CSP patients, with CSD volume possessing higher diagnostic efficacy than the other four MRI indicators.
Objective: Excessive weight gain, obesity, or insufficient weight gain during pregnancy can adversely affect both the mother and her offspring. This study aims to investigate the relationship between pregnant women's self-perception and beliefs and their body weight management during pregnancy.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey involving 350 pregnant women in Changsha City was conducted from July to September 2023. Instruments included a sociodemographic data sheet, protective motivation questionnaire for pregnancy body quality management, and scales measuring body image, anxiety, self-efficacy, and social support. Univariate analysis and multiple linear regression were employed to identify factors influencing protective motivation for body quality management during pregnancy.
Results: The average score of the protective motivation questionnaire was 124 (SD = 13.07), suggesting a need for enhanced weight management. Key factors influencing protective motivation included household income, cooperation with healthcare workers, sources of pregnancy information, midnight snacking habits, prepregnancy exercise, body image, and self-efficacy (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: The study highlights significant factors influencing pregnant women's motivation for body quality management. These include economic status, healthcare collaboration, information accessibility, lifestyle habits, and psychological factors. The findings underscore the need for healthcare professionals to integrate these factors into pregnancy care programs to improve body quality management.