首页 > 最新文献

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics最新文献

英文 中文
Global prevalence and risk factors of obstetric violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 产科暴力的全球流行率和风险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.16145
Sevil Hakimi, Leila Allahqoli, Maryam Alizadeh, Meryem Ozdemir, Hamid Soori, Esin Ceber Turfan, Neriman Sogukpinar, Ibrahim Alkatout

Background: Obstetric violence (OBV), defined as mistreatment or abuse during childbirth, is a pervasive global issue, albeit with regional differences, affecting women's physical and emotional well-being.

Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the prevalence of OBV to identify risk factors associated with OBV and to make suggestions for improving maternal healthcare practices and policies.

Search strategy: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched four electronic databases for studies published over 10 years up to 31 January 2024: Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS). The search was conducted among English language papers using a carefully curated set of keywords.

Selection criteria: We conducted a comprehensive review, including all observational reporting data on the prevalence of and risk factors associated with OBV, irrespective of geographical location. The studies included in the review were required to be published in peer-reviewed. journals and available in the English language.

Data collection and analysis: The data of the studies were summarized in an Excel file (version 19) and analyzed using R (version 4.2.3). A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the pooled prevalence of and identify risk factors associated with OBV.

Main results: The global prevalence of OBV estimated based on 25 studies, calculated with a random-effects model, was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.70; I2 = 99.5%). The most prevalent subdomain of OBV was non-consented care (37%; 95% CI 0.23-0.50; I2 = 99.7%). The following factors were found to be significantly associated with OBV: the presence of a midwife as skilled personnel beside the woman during childbirth (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI] = 0.4 [0.2-0.9]), which might reduce the likelihood of OBV; middle and high levels of income (OR [95% CI] = 0.5 [0.2-0.7]), which might also reduce the likelihood of OBV; and vaginal delivery (OR [95% CI] = 2.08 [1.1-3.08]), which is liable to increase the likelihood of OBV.

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the considerable prevalence and multifaceted nature of OBV, underscoring the urgent need for interventions at multiple levels to address this pervasive issue and ensure respectful, safe, and dignified maternal healthcare for all women.

{"title":"Global prevalence and risk factors of obstetric violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sevil Hakimi, Leila Allahqoli, Maryam Alizadeh, Meryem Ozdemir, Hamid Soori, Esin Ceber Turfan, Neriman Sogukpinar, Ibrahim Alkatout","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16145","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric violence (OBV), defined as mistreatment or abuse during childbirth, is a pervasive global issue, albeit with regional differences, affecting women's physical and emotional well-being.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the prevalence of OBV to identify risk factors associated with OBV and to make suggestions for improving maternal healthcare practices and policies.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched four electronic databases for studies published over 10 years up to 31 January 2024: Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS). The search was conducted among English language papers using a carefully curated set of keywords.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive review, including all observational reporting data on the prevalence of and risk factors associated with OBV, irrespective of geographical location. The studies included in the review were required to be published in peer-reviewed. journals and available in the English language.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>The data of the studies were summarized in an Excel file (version 19) and analyzed using R (version 4.2.3). A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the pooled prevalence of and identify risk factors associated with OBV.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The global prevalence of OBV estimated based on 25 studies, calculated with a random-effects model, was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.70; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.5%). The most prevalent subdomain of OBV was non-consented care (37%; 95% CI 0.23-0.50; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.7%). The following factors were found to be significantly associated with OBV: the presence of a midwife as skilled personnel beside the woman during childbirth (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI] = 0.4 [0.2-0.9]), which might reduce the likelihood of OBV; middle and high levels of income (OR [95% CI] = 0.5 [0.2-0.7]), which might also reduce the likelihood of OBV; and vaginal delivery (OR [95% CI] = 2.08 [1.1-3.08]), which is liable to increase the likelihood of OBV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the considerable prevalence and multifaceted nature of OBV, underscoring the urgent need for interventions at multiple levels to address this pervasive issue and ensure respectful, safe, and dignified maternal healthcare for all women.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142970763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gluten-free diet during pregnancy and pregnancy outcome: A retrospective cohort study.
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.16130
Johanna Kristiina Reijonen, Kati Maaria Hannele Tihtonen, Tiina Hannele Luukkaala, Jukka Tapio Uotila

Objective: A gluten-free diet (GFD) is becoming increasingly popular, especially among young females, and including those without diagnosed celiac disease (CD). Whether a GFD is appropriate during pregnancy remains unclear. Our primary aim was to evaluate the association of a GFD and neonatal birthweight and incidence of large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA). Secondarily, we sought associations with other obstetric outcomes.

Methods: The data was collected retrospectively from the Tampere University Hospital database. The study period was from January 2015 to April 2021. The diet information was obtained from self-reported questionnaires. All women following a GFD were included. A total of 79 had CD and 291 followed a GFD without CD diagnosis. The latter are referred to here as people without CD avoiding gluten (PWAG). A total of 456 omnivores were randomly chosen to constitute a control group. Outcomes were analyzed by comparing gluten-free groups to a control group.

Results: The median birth weight was higher in the GFD group compared to the controls (3533 vs. 3440 g, P < 0.003), but the incidences of SGA or LGA did not differ between the study groups. The incidence of pregnancy complications was comparable between the groups. Induction of labor was more frequent (aOR 1.52; 95% CI: 1.12-2.08), and the duration of labor was longer (aOR1.56; 95% CI: 1.18-2.06) in the GFD group, especially among PWAG. However, no difference in the cesarean section rate were found between the groups.

Conclusion: In the present retrospective cohort study, a GFD did not appear to be associated with adverse pregnancy or neonatal outcomes.

{"title":"Gluten-free diet during pregnancy and pregnancy outcome: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Johanna Kristiina Reijonen, Kati Maaria Hannele Tihtonen, Tiina Hannele Luukkaala, Jukka Tapio Uotila","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16130","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A gluten-free diet (GFD) is becoming increasingly popular, especially among young females, and including those without diagnosed celiac disease (CD). Whether a GFD is appropriate during pregnancy remains unclear. Our primary aim was to evaluate the association of a GFD and neonatal birthweight and incidence of large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA). Secondarily, we sought associations with other obstetric outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data was collected retrospectively from the Tampere University Hospital database. The study period was from January 2015 to April 2021. The diet information was obtained from self-reported questionnaires. All women following a GFD were included. A total of 79 had CD and 291 followed a GFD without CD diagnosis. The latter are referred to here as people without CD avoiding gluten (PWAG). A total of 456 omnivores were randomly chosen to constitute a control group. Outcomes were analyzed by comparing gluten-free groups to a control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median birth weight was higher in the GFD group compared to the controls (3533 vs. 3440 g, P < 0.003), but the incidences of SGA or LGA did not differ between the study groups. The incidence of pregnancy complications was comparable between the groups. Induction of labor was more frequent (aOR 1.52; 95% CI: 1.12-2.08), and the duration of labor was longer (aOR1.56; 95% CI: 1.18-2.06) in the GFD group, especially among PWAG. However, no difference in the cesarean section rate were found between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the present retrospective cohort study, a GFD did not appear to be associated with adverse pregnancy or neonatal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142948963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impacts of Ramadan fasting during pregnancy on pregnancy and birth outcomes: An umbrella review.
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.16127
Abdullah Al-Taiar, Md Estiar Rahman, May Salama, Ali H Ziyab, Wilfried Karmaus
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite a large number of primary research studies, and systematic and narrative reviews, there is no consensus on the impact of fasting during Ramadan while pregnant on pregnancy and birth outcomes. Currently, there is no evidence-based guideline for Muslim women regarding Ramadan fasting during pregnancy and clinicians cannot provide firm recommendations.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the current evidence regarding the impact of Ramadan fasting during pregnancy on pregnancy and birth outcomes.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>We conducted an umbrella review of all systematic and narrative reviews examining the impacts of fasting during Ramadan while pregnant on pregnancy and birth outcomes by searching PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Registry of Systematic Reviews databases between November 2023 and February 2024.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included all systematic and narrative reviews examining the impacts of Ramadan fasting on pregnancy and birth outcomes. The primary outcome was the change in birth weight, gestational age at birth, fetal growth indices, and Apgar score as well as the risk of delivery by cesarean section and the risks of gestational diabetes and pre-eclampsia.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We summarized the data using narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics as appropriate. This study was registered with PROSPERO, ID: CRD42023478819.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Out of 943 published reports identified across all database searches, 13 systematic and narrative reviews were included, of which three were systematic reviews with meta-analysis, six were systematic reviews without meta-analysis, and the remaining four were narrative reviews. There is no sufficient evidence that Ramadan fasting during pregnancy may reduce gestational age at birth or increase the risk of preterm birth (PTB). There is little evidence to support the hypothesis that maternal Ramadan fasting may reduce birth weight or increase the risk of low birth weight (LBW). Systematic reviews showed pooled estimates of odds ratios ranging between 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-1.44) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.72-1.37) for PTB, and between 1.05 (95% CI 0.87-1.26) and 1.37 (95% CI 0.74-2.53) for LBW. There is no sufficient evidence that Ramadan fasting during pregnancy may increase the risk of delivery by cesarean section, gestational diabetes, or the risk of pre-eclampsia. None of the reviews reported evidence regarding the impacts of fasting during pregnancy on rare but clinically significant pregnancy and birth outcomes such as stillbirth, miscarriage, congenital anomalies, or neonatal deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is little evidence that Ramadan fasting during pregnancy can negatively impact pregnancy and birth outcomes. Primary research studies on this issue suffered from significant methodologic limitations and systematic reviews showed s
{"title":"Impacts of Ramadan fasting during pregnancy on pregnancy and birth outcomes: An umbrella review.","authors":"Abdullah Al-Taiar, Md Estiar Rahman, May Salama, Ali H Ziyab, Wilfried Karmaus","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16127","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Despite a large number of primary research studies, and systematic and narrative reviews, there is no consensus on the impact of fasting during Ramadan while pregnant on pregnancy and birth outcomes. Currently, there is no evidence-based guideline for Muslim women regarding Ramadan fasting during pregnancy and clinicians cannot provide firm recommendations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;To review the current evidence regarding the impact of Ramadan fasting during pregnancy on pregnancy and birth outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Search strategy: &lt;/strong&gt;We conducted an umbrella review of all systematic and narrative reviews examining the impacts of fasting during Ramadan while pregnant on pregnancy and birth outcomes by searching PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Registry of Systematic Reviews databases between November 2023 and February 2024.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Selection criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;We included all systematic and narrative reviews examining the impacts of Ramadan fasting on pregnancy and birth outcomes. The primary outcome was the change in birth weight, gestational age at birth, fetal growth indices, and Apgar score as well as the risk of delivery by cesarean section and the risks of gestational diabetes and pre-eclampsia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Data collection and analysis: &lt;/strong&gt;We summarized the data using narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics as appropriate. This study was registered with PROSPERO, ID: CRD42023478819.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main results: &lt;/strong&gt;Out of 943 published reports identified across all database searches, 13 systematic and narrative reviews were included, of which three were systematic reviews with meta-analysis, six were systematic reviews without meta-analysis, and the remaining four were narrative reviews. There is no sufficient evidence that Ramadan fasting during pregnancy may reduce gestational age at birth or increase the risk of preterm birth (PTB). There is little evidence to support the hypothesis that maternal Ramadan fasting may reduce birth weight or increase the risk of low birth weight (LBW). Systematic reviews showed pooled estimates of odds ratios ranging between 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-1.44) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.72-1.37) for PTB, and between 1.05 (95% CI 0.87-1.26) and 1.37 (95% CI 0.74-2.53) for LBW. There is no sufficient evidence that Ramadan fasting during pregnancy may increase the risk of delivery by cesarean section, gestational diabetes, or the risk of pre-eclampsia. None of the reviews reported evidence regarding the impacts of fasting during pregnancy on rare but clinically significant pregnancy and birth outcomes such as stillbirth, miscarriage, congenital anomalies, or neonatal deaths.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;There is little evidence that Ramadan fasting during pregnancy can negatively impact pregnancy and birth outcomes. Primary research studies on this issue suffered from significant methodologic limitations and systematic reviews showed s","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142948964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Complex cesarean section: Surgical approach to reduce the risks of intraoperative complications and postpartum hemorrhage.
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.16094
Albaro Jose Nieto-Calvache, Diana Ramasauskaite, Jose Miguel Palacios-Jaraquemada, Ahmed M Hussein, Eric Jauniaux, Akaninyene Eseme Bernard Ubom, Luisa F Rivera-Torres, Ines Nunes, Dietmar Schlembach, Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya, Alison Wright

The incidence of cesarean section is dramatically increasing worldwide, whereas the training opportunities for obstetrician/gynecologists to manage complex cesarean section appear to be decreasing. This may be attributed to changing working hours directives and the increasing use of laparoscopy for gynecological surgical procedures, including in gynecological oncology. Various situations can create surgical difficulties during a cesarean section; however, two of the most frequent are complications from previous cesarean (myometrial defects, with or without placental intrusion and peritoneal adhesions) and the high risk of postpartum hemorrhage (uterine overdistension, abnormal placentation, uterine fibroids). Careful surgical dissection, with safe mobilization of the bladder and exposure of the anterior and lateral surfaces of the uterus, are pivotal steps for resolving the technical difficulties inherent in performing a complex cesarean section. We propose a standardized surgical protocol for women at risk of complex cesarean, including the antenatal identification of increased surgical risk, paramedian access to the pelvis, bladder dissection and mobilization, and the selection of a bleeding control strategy, considering uterine anatomy and the arterial pedicles involved in blood loss, which should be tailored to the individual case. We propose preoperative surgical planning to include consideration of the most common situations encountered during a complex cesarean, which facilitates anticipating an appropriate response for common possible scenarios, and can be adapted for low-, middle-, and high-resource settings. This protocol also highlights the importance of self-evaluation, continuous learning, and improvement activities within surgical teams.

{"title":"Complex cesarean section: Surgical approach to reduce the risks of intraoperative complications and postpartum hemorrhage.","authors":"Albaro Jose Nieto-Calvache, Diana Ramasauskaite, Jose Miguel Palacios-Jaraquemada, Ahmed M Hussein, Eric Jauniaux, Akaninyene Eseme Bernard Ubom, Luisa F Rivera-Torres, Ines Nunes, Dietmar Schlembach, Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya, Alison Wright","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16094","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The incidence of cesarean section is dramatically increasing worldwide, whereas the training opportunities for obstetrician/gynecologists to manage complex cesarean section appear to be decreasing. This may be attributed to changing working hours directives and the increasing use of laparoscopy for gynecological surgical procedures, including in gynecological oncology. Various situations can create surgical difficulties during a cesarean section; however, two of the most frequent are complications from previous cesarean (myometrial defects, with or without placental intrusion and peritoneal adhesions) and the high risk of postpartum hemorrhage (uterine overdistension, abnormal placentation, uterine fibroids). Careful surgical dissection, with safe mobilization of the bladder and exposure of the anterior and lateral surfaces of the uterus, are pivotal steps for resolving the technical difficulties inherent in performing a complex cesarean section. We propose a standardized surgical protocol for women at risk of complex cesarean, including the antenatal identification of increased surgical risk, paramedian access to the pelvis, bladder dissection and mobilization, and the selection of a bleeding control strategy, considering uterine anatomy and the arterial pedicles involved in blood loss, which should be tailored to the individual case. We propose preoperative surgical planning to include consideration of the most common situations encountered during a complex cesarean, which facilitates anticipating an appropriate response for common possible scenarios, and can be adapted for low-, middle-, and high-resource settings. This protocol also highlights the importance of self-evaluation, continuous learning, and improvement activities within surgical teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Informed consent and ethical issues pertaining to female sterilization-Scoping review.
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.16100
Sharol Malekobane Maila, Camille Castelyn, Sumaiya Adam
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Female sterilization, a safe, permanent method of contraception that blocks the fallopian tubes, has been in use since the 19th century. The procedure necessitates informed consent, a critical step that has been marred by reports of forced sterilization since World War II. These incidents often stem from inadequate consent processes where ethical principles are overlooked or deliberately flouted. The persistent issue of forced sterilization, primarily attributable to a flawed informed consent process, highlights significant ethical concerns.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review aimed to identify the ethical challenges associated with the informed consent process for female sterilization, including instances of forced sterilization.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>The review employed a comprehensive electronic search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Central, targeting literature published in English between January 2000 and December 2021. The search strategy utilized key terms related to informed consent, ethical issues, and female sterilization, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) methodology for database search and screening.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>The search resulted in the inclusion of 55 published articles for this review. Studies were selected if they focused on informed consent for female sterilization and reported on forced or coerced sterilization involving mentally competent women aged 18 years and older. Exclusions were made for studies on women younger than 18 years, those related to emergency procedures, and non-English language publications.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>A two-stage screening process was used to assess the relevance of the identified studies, with independent reviewers evaluating titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data were extracted using a predefined tool, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. The analysis focused on summarizing the ethical issues identified and recommendations for improving the consent process.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The review identified vulnerable populations, particularly women reliant on the state or government for health care, as being at higher risk of forced sterilization. Cases of sterilization without consent, under coercion, sedation, or through inducements/incentives have been reported. Recommendations from international obstetrics and gynecology societies, health organizations, human rights bodies, and local governments have been issued in an attempt to improve the consent process. Notably, the United States implemented a Medicaid consent form in the 1970s, which has yet to be revised, attracting significant criticism for some of its components. Meanwhile, low- and middle-income countries lack standardized tools to add
{"title":"Informed consent and ethical issues pertaining to female sterilization-Scoping review.","authors":"Sharol Malekobane Maila, Camille Castelyn, Sumaiya Adam","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16100","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Female sterilization, a safe, permanent method of contraception that blocks the fallopian tubes, has been in use since the 19th century. The procedure necessitates informed consent, a critical step that has been marred by reports of forced sterilization since World War II. These incidents often stem from inadequate consent processes where ethical principles are overlooked or deliberately flouted. The persistent issue of forced sterilization, primarily attributable to a flawed informed consent process, highlights significant ethical concerns.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;This scoping review aimed to identify the ethical challenges associated with the informed consent process for female sterilization, including instances of forced sterilization.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Search strategy: &lt;/strong&gt;The review employed a comprehensive electronic search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Central, targeting literature published in English between January 2000 and December 2021. The search strategy utilized key terms related to informed consent, ethical issues, and female sterilization, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) methodology for database search and screening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Selection criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;The search resulted in the inclusion of 55 published articles for this review. Studies were selected if they focused on informed consent for female sterilization and reported on forced or coerced sterilization involving mentally competent women aged 18 years and older. Exclusions were made for studies on women younger than 18 years, those related to emergency procedures, and non-English language publications.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Data collection and analysis: &lt;/strong&gt;A two-stage screening process was used to assess the relevance of the identified studies, with independent reviewers evaluating titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data were extracted using a predefined tool, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. The analysis focused on summarizing the ethical issues identified and recommendations for improving the consent process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main results: &lt;/strong&gt;The review identified vulnerable populations, particularly women reliant on the state or government for health care, as being at higher risk of forced sterilization. Cases of sterilization without consent, under coercion, sedation, or through inducements/incentives have been reported. Recommendations from international obstetrics and gynecology societies, health organizations, human rights bodies, and local governments have been issued in an attempt to improve the consent process. Notably, the United States implemented a Medicaid consent form in the 1970s, which has yet to be revised, attracting significant criticism for some of its components. Meanwhile, low- and middle-income countries lack standardized tools to add","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.16108
Irene Porcari, Mariachiara Bosco, Pier Carlo Zorzato, Simone Garzon, Stefano Uccella
{"title":"Response: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.","authors":"Irene Porcari, Mariachiara Bosco, Pier Carlo Zorzato, Simone Garzon, Stefano Uccella","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16108","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142927002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative clinical and incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for pelvic inflammatory disease in southern Brazil.
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.16114
Michele S Savaris, Thais V Xavier, Gabriela Ecco, Artur C Rhoden, Leandro T Cavazzola, Ricardo F Savaris

Objective: This paper evaluates the accuracy of C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocyte count, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for diagnosing tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) and assessing the cost-effectiveness of different treatment regimens for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), with and without TOA.

Method: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 1, 2003, and December 30, 2021, including women aged 13-80 years diagnosed with PID. The analysis focused on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of different treatment regimens.

Results: C-reactive protein, leukocyte count, and NLR were found to be statistically significant markers for diagnosing TOA. Out of 907 PID cases, 705 achieved clinical cure with initial treatment. The most cost-effective treatment for mild PID without TOA was ceftriaxone combined with azithromycin, which was considered less costly and more effective in the cost-effectiveness analysis. For severe PID with TOA, ampicillin combined with gentamicin and clindamycin was more cost-effective compared to ampicillin with sulbactam plus doxycycline, given a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$213.57 for a 4.2% increase in cure rate.

Conclusion: The study's findings support the use of CRP, leukocyte count, and NLR as diagnostic tools for TOA. Ceftriaxone combined with azithromycin is recommended as the first-line treatment for mild PID at our institution due to its cost-effectiveness. For TOA, ampicillin combined with gentamicin and clindamycin is a cost-effective option if the healthcare system's willingness to pay exceeds US$213.57 for a 4.2% increase in cure rate, contributing valuable insights for PID treatment strategies from a hospital's perspective. The average time of hospital admission for TOA was 3 days. After discharge, patients received oral doxycycline until completing 14 days of treatment.

{"title":"Comparative clinical and incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for pelvic inflammatory disease in southern Brazil.","authors":"Michele S Savaris, Thais V Xavier, Gabriela Ecco, Artur C Rhoden, Leandro T Cavazzola, Ricardo F Savaris","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper evaluates the accuracy of C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocyte count, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for diagnosing tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) and assessing the cost-effectiveness of different treatment regimens for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), with and without TOA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 1, 2003, and December 30, 2021, including women aged 13-80 years diagnosed with PID. The analysis focused on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of different treatment regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>C-reactive protein, leukocyte count, and NLR were found to be statistically significant markers for diagnosing TOA. Out of 907 PID cases, 705 achieved clinical cure with initial treatment. The most cost-effective treatment for mild PID without TOA was ceftriaxone combined with azithromycin, which was considered less costly and more effective in the cost-effectiveness analysis. For severe PID with TOA, ampicillin combined with gentamicin and clindamycin was more cost-effective compared to ampicillin with sulbactam plus doxycycline, given a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$213.57 for a 4.2% increase in cure rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study's findings support the use of CRP, leukocyte count, and NLR as diagnostic tools for TOA. Ceftriaxone combined with azithromycin is recommended as the first-line treatment for mild PID at our institution due to its cost-effectiveness. For TOA, ampicillin combined with gentamicin and clindamycin is a cost-effective option if the healthcare system's willingness to pay exceeds US$213.57 for a 4.2% increase in cure rate, contributing valuable insights for PID treatment strategies from a hospital's perspective. The average time of hospital admission for TOA was 3 days. After discharge, patients received oral doxycycline until completing 14 days of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use and knowledge of the two FIGO systems for nongestational abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: A multinational survey.
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.16138
Francisco J Ruiloba, Ally Murji, Qinjie Tian, Sarah Maheux-Lacroix, Goknur Topcu, Priyankur Roy, Akaninyene Eseme Ubom, Malcolm G Munro

Objective: To evaluate the worldwide use of FIGO's two systems for the classification of causes and contributors to nongestational abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years by obstetrics and gynecology professionals worldwide, to identify knowledge gaps, and explore barriers to implementation.

Methods: An electronic survey was developed by members of FIGO's Menstrual Disorders and Related Health Impacts (MDRHI) Committee to assess knowledge of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and the two FIGO AUB systems among obstetricians and gynecologists. The survey was conducted online from February 28 to June 30, 2023, and comprised demographic questions, educational content inquiries, and a knowledge assessment. Available in English, Spanish, French, and Mandarin, the survey was disseminated through representatives of the World Association of Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynecology (WATOG), as well as through digital platforms and trainee-focused Facebook groups.

Results: Out of 1317 initial participants from 65 countries, 1114 completed the survey. The highest representation was from China (42.6%), where both trainees and clinicians participated. Participation varied across FIGO regions, with Asia-Oceania contributing the most (n = 602) and North America the least (n = 62). Most participants were in hospital-based residency programs (73.9%), graduating around 2012 with 3 years of postgraduate medical education. Nearly 70% reported being familiar with FIGO systems, while over 93% were familiar with PALM-COEIN. About one-third reported frequent use of FIGO systems by faculty, except among French-speaking respondents. Higher composite FIGO systems knowledge scores correlated with familiarity with FIGO AUB systems and PALM COEIN. Language did not significantly affect scores.

Conclusion: FIGO's systems for nongestational AUB are widely used but gaps persist. Targeted strategies focusing on faculty development and research are needed to improve awareness and proficiency. This study highlights the necessity for interventions in medical education to enhance trainees' understanding and utilization of standardized nomenclature.

{"title":"Use and knowledge of the two FIGO systems for nongestational abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: A multinational survey.","authors":"Francisco J Ruiloba, Ally Murji, Qinjie Tian, Sarah Maheux-Lacroix, Goknur Topcu, Priyankur Roy, Akaninyene Eseme Ubom, Malcolm G Munro","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16138","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the worldwide use of FIGO's two systems for the classification of causes and contributors to nongestational abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years by obstetrics and gynecology professionals worldwide, to identify knowledge gaps, and explore barriers to implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey was developed by members of FIGO's Menstrual Disorders and Related Health Impacts (MDRHI) Committee to assess knowledge of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and the two FIGO AUB systems among obstetricians and gynecologists. The survey was conducted online from February 28 to June 30, 2023, and comprised demographic questions, educational content inquiries, and a knowledge assessment. Available in English, Spanish, French, and Mandarin, the survey was disseminated through representatives of the World Association of Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynecology (WATOG), as well as through digital platforms and trainee-focused Facebook groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1317 initial participants from 65 countries, 1114 completed the survey. The highest representation was from China (42.6%), where both trainees and clinicians participated. Participation varied across FIGO regions, with Asia-Oceania contributing the most (n = 602) and North America the least (n = 62). Most participants were in hospital-based residency programs (73.9%), graduating around 2012 with 3 years of postgraduate medical education. Nearly 70% reported being familiar with FIGO systems, while over 93% were familiar with PALM-COEIN. About one-third reported frequent use of FIGO systems by faculty, except among French-speaking respondents. Higher composite FIGO systems knowledge scores correlated with familiarity with FIGO AUB systems and PALM COEIN. Language did not significantly affect scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FIGO's systems for nongestational AUB are widely used but gaps persist. Targeted strategies focusing on faculty development and research are needed to improve awareness and proficiency. This study highlights the necessity for interventions in medical education to enhance trainees' understanding and utilization of standardized nomenclature.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142927004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring glycemic variability and time in range: Emerging indicators of at-risk pregnancy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.16140
Vishwani Khurana, Aruna Nigam, Arpita De

Objective: This study compares ambulatory glycemic profile and glycemic variability between pregnant women diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving pharmacotherapy and healthy pregnant women without diabetes and assesses their correlation with fetal outcome.

Method: This was a case-control study involving 60 pregnant women (40 with T2DM and 20 healthy controls) in the third trimester of pregnancy. A flash glucose monitor device was applied over the upper arm to obtain the ambulatory glucose profile. Various glycemic parameters were analyzed and correlated with fetal outcomes among the two groups.

Results: A total of 720 days of glucose data, comprising 69 120 data points, were analyzed. This included 46 080 glucose values from the T2DM group and 23 040 from the healthy control group. Mean glucose levels in the T2DM group were 23.75% higher compared to the controls. All measures of glycemic variability were significantly elevated in the T2DM group, including mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) (52.85 mg/dL vs. 35.72 mg/dL, P = 0.036) and standard deviation (22.84 mg/dL vs. 14.00 mg/dL, P = 0.029). A MAGE >55 mg/dL was associated with adverse fetal outcomes, such as large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants, neonatal hypoglycemia, and stillbirth. In the T2DM group, poor outcomes were also linked to a higher time above range (TAR) (13.39% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.0001). The LGA subgroup exhibited an elevated TAR (15.2%) compared to those with normal outcomes.

Conclusion: Pregnant women with T2DM exhibit higher glycemic variability compared to healthy pregnant women. A MAGE >55 mg/dL was associated with adverse fetal outcomes, and elevated TAR significantly influenced these outcomes.

{"title":"Exploring glycemic variability and time in range: Emerging indicators of at-risk pregnancy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.","authors":"Vishwani Khurana, Aruna Nigam, Arpita De","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16140","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compares ambulatory glycemic profile and glycemic variability between pregnant women diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving pharmacotherapy and healthy pregnant women without diabetes and assesses their correlation with fetal outcome.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a case-control study involving 60 pregnant women (40 with T2DM and 20 healthy controls) in the third trimester of pregnancy. A flash glucose monitor device was applied over the upper arm to obtain the ambulatory glucose profile. Various glycemic parameters were analyzed and correlated with fetal outcomes among the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 720 days of glucose data, comprising 69 120 data points, were analyzed. This included 46 080 glucose values from the T2DM group and 23 040 from the healthy control group. Mean glucose levels in the T2DM group were 23.75% higher compared to the controls. All measures of glycemic variability were significantly elevated in the T2DM group, including mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) (52.85 mg/dL vs. 35.72 mg/dL, P = 0.036) and standard deviation (22.84 mg/dL vs. 14.00 mg/dL, P = 0.029). A MAGE >55 mg/dL was associated with adverse fetal outcomes, such as large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants, neonatal hypoglycemia, and stillbirth. In the T2DM group, poor outcomes were also linked to a higher time above range (TAR) (13.39% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.0001). The LGA subgroup exhibited an elevated TAR (15.2%) compared to those with normal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnant women with T2DM exhibit higher glycemic variability compared to healthy pregnant women. A MAGE >55 mg/dL was associated with adverse fetal outcomes, and elevated TAR significantly influenced these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the editor: Comparing the coagulation and platelet parameters of women with premature ovarian insufficiency with those of age-matched controls: A case-control study.
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.16142
Cengiz Beyan
{"title":"Letter to the editor: Comparing the coagulation and platelet parameters of women with premature ovarian insufficiency with those of age-matched controls: A case-control study.","authors":"Cengiz Beyan","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16142","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1