Pub Date : 2022-06-30DOI: 10.17846/cl.2022.15.1.24-39
Jozef Filo
FILO, Jozef. The Beginnings of the Pro-Anjou Attitude of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem in the Hungarian Kingdom in the Light of the Hospitallers’ Communication. The history of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem in the medieval Kingdom of Hungary is known in the nowadays Slovak public especially thanks to its participation in the well-known battle of Rozhanovce in 1312 alongside Charles I of Hungary (better known as Charles Robert). With this crucial help to the first Angevin Hungarian king, the Hospitallers most significantly proved their allegiance to the Anjou dynasty. This study focuses on tracing the beginnings of cooperation between the Hungarian Hospitallers and the Anjou dynasty before the battle of Rozhanovce, based on manifestations of the pro-Anjou attitude in the light of the Hospitallers’ forms of communication. Firstly, the paper examines the period of the reign of the last Arpadian king, Andrew III, when the Anjou dynasty was already trying to establish itself in the Kingdom of Hungary. The information on whether the Hospitallers stood on the side of Angevines or they did not, cannot be acquired from the extant written sources from the last decade of the 13th century. On the other hand, it can be stated that they cooperated with Andrew III, at least regarding property and legal matters. Furthermore, the study deals with the period of consolidation of the royal power in the Hungarian kingdom until the Battle of Rozhanovce. Based on several written sources, it can be stated that in the first decade of the 14th century, the Order of St. John in the Hungarian kingdom unequivocally joined the side of Charles I at latest in August 1303. Moreover, the presented sources are unique examples of symbolic, visual, written, but also personal manners of communication of the Hungarian Hospitallers at the turn of the 13th and 14th century.
{"title":"Počiatky proanjouovského postoja Rádu svätého Jána Jeruzalemského v Uhorsku vo svetle johanitskej komunikácie","authors":"Jozef Filo","doi":"10.17846/cl.2022.15.1.24-39","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17846/cl.2022.15.1.24-39","url":null,"abstract":"FILO, Jozef. The Beginnings of the Pro-Anjou Attitude of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem in the Hungarian Kingdom in the Light of the Hospitallers’ Communication. The history of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem in the medieval Kingdom of Hungary is known in the nowadays Slovak public especially thanks to its participation in the well-known battle of Rozhanovce in 1312 alongside Charles I of Hungary (better known as Charles Robert). With this crucial help to the first Angevin Hungarian king, the Hospitallers most significantly proved their allegiance to the Anjou dynasty. This study focuses on tracing the beginnings of cooperation between the Hungarian Hospitallers and the Anjou dynasty before the battle of Rozhanovce, based on manifestations of the pro-Anjou attitude in the light of the Hospitallers’ forms of communication. Firstly, the paper examines the period of the reign of the last Arpadian king, Andrew III, when the Anjou dynasty was already trying to establish itself in the Kingdom of Hungary. The information on whether the Hospitallers stood on the side of Angevines or they did not, cannot be acquired from the extant written sources from the last decade of the 13th century. On the other hand, it can be stated that they cooperated with Andrew III, at least regarding property and legal matters. Furthermore, the study deals with the period of consolidation of the royal power in the Hungarian kingdom until the Battle of Rozhanovce. Based on several written sources, it can be stated that in the first decade of the 14th century, the Order of St. John in the Hungarian kingdom unequivocally joined the side of Charles I at latest in August 1303. Moreover, the presented sources are unique examples of symbolic, visual, written, but also personal manners of communication of the Hungarian Hospitallers at the turn of the 13th and 14th century.","PeriodicalId":142049,"journal":{"name":"Konštantínove listy/Constantine's Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133345027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-31DOI: 10.17846/cl.2022.15.2.79-89
Pavel Krafl
{"title":"Konfraternity Konventu Panny Marie a sv. Karla Velikého na Novém Městě Pražském z doby předhusitské","authors":"Pavel Krafl","doi":"10.17846/cl.2022.15.2.79-89","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17846/cl.2022.15.2.79-89","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":142049,"journal":{"name":"Konštantínove listy/Constantine's Letters","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124904863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-31DOI: 10.17846/cl.2021.14.2.176-190
Ľubomír Hlad
{"title":"Homília Mons. Viliama Judáka prednesená na púti pri príležitosti slávnosti sv. Cyrila a Metoda dňa 5. júla 2020 v Nitre a jej prínos k rozvoju cyrilo-metodskej tradície","authors":"Ľubomír Hlad","doi":"10.17846/cl.2021.14.2.176-190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17846/cl.2021.14.2.176-190","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":142049,"journal":{"name":"Konštantínove listy/Constantine's Letters","volume":"55 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123079029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-31DOI: 10.17846/cl.2022.15.2.106-126
P. Ivanič
{"title":"Relics of St. Constantine-Cyril in Slovakia","authors":"P. Ivanič","doi":"10.17846/cl.2022.15.2.106-126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17846/cl.2022.15.2.106-126","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":142049,"journal":{"name":"Konštantínove listy/Constantine's Letters","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123269863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-31DOI: 10.17846/cl.2021.14.2.139-147
Ľubomír Kralčák
{"title":"Martin Hattala a jeho vklad do diskusie o historickom pomere medzi hlaholikou a cyrilikou","authors":"Ľubomír Kralčák","doi":"10.17846/cl.2021.14.2.139-147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17846/cl.2021.14.2.139-147","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":142049,"journal":{"name":"Konštantínove listy/Constantine's Letters","volume":"156-157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124044946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-31DOI: 10.17846/cl.2021.14.2.26-36
R. Jáger
{"title":"Guilt and Culpability in the Law of Great Moravia","authors":"R. Jáger","doi":"10.17846/cl.2021.14.2.26-36","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17846/cl.2021.14.2.26-36","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":142049,"journal":{"name":"Konštantínove listy/Constantine's Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131036776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-31DOI: 10.17846/cl.2022.15.2.170-194
Patrik Maturkanič, Ivana Tomanová Čergeťová, Aleksander Kobylarek, Jan Zimny
{"title":"Novoevangelizační pastorace v litoměřické diecéze ve stopách slovanských věrozvěstů Cyrila a Metoděje","authors":"Patrik Maturkanič, Ivana Tomanová Čergeťová, Aleksander Kobylarek, Jan Zimny","doi":"10.17846/cl.2022.15.2.170-194","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17846/cl.2022.15.2.170-194","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":142049,"journal":{"name":"Konštantínove listy/Constantine's Letters","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115945387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-31DOI: 10.17846/cl.2022.15.2.139-148
A. Kamenskikh, V. Kamenskikh
••• Abstract: KAMENSKIKH, Aleksey – KAMENSKIKH, Vasiliy. What Does It Mean to be «an Origenist»? A Case of Aleksey Khomyakov . The article discusses the hypothesis about alleged «Origenism» of Aleksey Khomyakov, one of the leaders of Slavophile movement in 19th-century Russia. Two versions of this hypothesis, “a strong” and “a weak” one, were offered by Basil (Vadim) Lourié in his works of 1994 and 2020. For clarification of this hypothesis’ “conceptual context” an attempt was made to discern and conceptualize two main approaches in studies on forms of intellectual heritage reception of Origen of Alexandria, first of all in Russia. The first approach can with some degree of convenience be called “realist”: Origenism within it is considered as some stable philosophical or theological position, interpreted in an extremely broad manner – as a kind of sharp platonization of Christianity, or as an attempt at free philosophizing within Christian tradition. In frameworks of this approach, reception of any element of Origenism by a later thinker intends him accept all the position, makes him an “Origenist” and a Platonist. Unlike this “realist” approach, the “nominalist” one assumes to consider intellectual heritage of Origen of Alexandria as a complex set of theological and philosophical hypotheses, peculiarities of style – and the personality of the Alexandrian thinker. This approach demands much more delicate treatment of the terms “Origenist” and “Origenism”. Applied to B. Lourié’s hypothesis about Aleksey Khomyakov’s Origenism, this distinguishing interprets “the strong” version of the hypothesis as “extremely realistic” and “the weak” version as a form of moderate realism, much more nuanced and historically correct. This version states the importance which had an image of Origen’s doctrine framed by August Neander in the second volume of his “General History of the Christian Religion and Church” (1843) for Khomyakov’s theological and philosophical views.
{"title":"What Does It Mean to be «an Origenist»? A Case of Aleksey Khomyakov","authors":"A. Kamenskikh, V. Kamenskikh","doi":"10.17846/cl.2022.15.2.139-148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17846/cl.2022.15.2.139-148","url":null,"abstract":"••• Abstract: KAMENSKIKH, Aleksey – KAMENSKIKH, Vasiliy. What Does It Mean to be «an Origenist»? A Case of Aleksey Khomyakov . The article discusses the hypothesis about alleged «Origenism» of Aleksey Khomyakov, one of the leaders of Slavophile movement in 19th-century Russia. Two versions of this hypothesis, “a strong” and “a weak” one, were offered by Basil (Vadim) Lourié in his works of 1994 and 2020. For clarification of this hypothesis’ “conceptual context” an attempt was made to discern and conceptualize two main approaches in studies on forms of intellectual heritage reception of Origen of Alexandria, first of all in Russia. The first approach can with some degree of convenience be called “realist”: Origenism within it is considered as some stable philosophical or theological position, interpreted in an extremely broad manner – as a kind of sharp platonization of Christianity, or as an attempt at free philosophizing within Christian tradition. In frameworks of this approach, reception of any element of Origenism by a later thinker intends him accept all the position, makes him an “Origenist” and a Platonist. Unlike this “realist” approach, the “nominalist” one assumes to consider intellectual heritage of Origen of Alexandria as a complex set of theological and philosophical hypotheses, peculiarities of style – and the personality of the Alexandrian thinker. This approach demands much more delicate treatment of the terms “Origenist” and “Origenism”. Applied to B. Lourié’s hypothesis about Aleksey Khomyakov’s Origenism, this distinguishing interprets “the strong” version of the hypothesis as “extremely realistic” and “the weak” version as a form of moderate realism, much more nuanced and historically correct. This version states the importance which had an image of Origen’s doctrine framed by August Neander in the second volume of his “General History of the Christian Religion and Church” (1843) for Khomyakov’s theological and philosophical views.","PeriodicalId":142049,"journal":{"name":"Konštantínove listy/Constantine's Letters","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114864004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：