International journal of obstetric anesthesia最新文献

Background

Intra-operative pain during Caesarean delivery (PDCD) is the leading cause of successful litigation against obstetric anaesthesiologists. PDCD may require conversion to general anaesthesia (GA). The aim of this analysis is to assess our incidence of PDCD and associated GA conversion.

Methods

Data were collected from electronic patient records. Data included baseline demographics, incidence of PDCD and rates of GA conversion, proportion of PDCD cases attributable to failed epidural (EA) or spinal anaesthesia (SA), and level of sensory and motor blockade in cases of PDCD. Results were audited against current standards set by the Royal College of Anaesthetists ‘rates of PDCD should be <5% for category 4, <15% for categories 2-3, and <20 % for category 1 CD ’ and that ‘rates of conversion to GA due to neuraxial complications should be <1% for category 4, <5% for categories 2-3 and <15% for category 1 patients’.

Results

During the 12-month study period, 2,429 patients underwent CD, of whom 52 (2.1%) experienced PDCD. The incidence of PDCD was 3.1% (41/1,309) for category 1-3 patients, while 1% (11/1,120) of category 4 patients experienced PDS. Of the 52 patients with PDCD, 17 patients required GA (33%). SA was used in 24/52 (47%) cases and EA in 28/52 (53%) cases. The median level of sensory block in patients with PDCD was located at the T4 dermatome, the median level of motor block was Bromage level 2.

Conclusions

PDCD occurred in 2.1% of CD, one-third required conversion to GA. Most patients experiencing PDCD met current motor and sensory blockade criteria.

The peripartum management of obstetric patients with Chiari type I malformation remains a challenge due to the degree of cerebellar tonsillar herniation and a paucity of published evidence. There is concern about neuraxial anaesthetic blocks and uncertainty regarding the optimum mode of delivery.

We systematically searched the literature for the obstetric management of patients with Chiari type I malformation, independent of publication date and language. We also searched our local hospital database from December 2009 to December 2022 for all deliveries to patients with this condition. We identified 137 cases comprising 103 deliveries described in 40 publications that met our inclusion criteria; 34 deliveries were identified in our local database. There were 84 spontaneous vaginal deliveries, 52 caesarean deliveries, and one delivery by unknown modality. Sixty neuraxial blocks were performed; approximately half of these were epidural procedures for labour analgesia. Six patients had new or worsened symptoms following delivery, but it is unclear whether these were related to their Chiari malformation. We identified no cases with brainstem herniation or severe symptoms.

We discuss our findings in relation to other published literature and address the concerns described. Our review reveals the use of a variety of modes of delivery and anaesthetic techniques and that most patients suffered no neurological complication. We conclude there is no of evidence to avoid any one approach to labour analgesia, delivery and anaesthesia. We propose a holistic, individualised and patient-centred approach with an appraisal of the risks and benefits to support shared-decision making.

Background

Patient satisfaction and quality of recovery (QoR) are important patient-reported outcomes and quality metrics. The relationship between these two outcomes is complex, with studies showing a weak correlation between them in the non-obstetric population. We sought to evaluate the correlation between patient satisfaction and QoR scores in the obstetric population after caesarean delivery. As secondary aims, we aimed to determine the influence of urgency of procedure and mode of anaesthetic on patient satisfaction and QoR scores as well as determining drivers of satisfaction and dissatisfaction.

Methods

Women were invited to complete the Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Caesarean Section (MSCS) and Obstetric Quality of Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11) questionnaires at 24 h after caesarean delivery. Correlations were analysed using Spearman’s rank tests. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.

Results

Data were collected from 300 women. There was a significant but weak positive correlation between ObsQoR-11 and MSCS scores (r = 0.31, P < 0.001). Correlation was significantly influenced by mode of anaesthesia (P < 0.001) and urgency of procedure (P = 0.005), with greater satisfaction amongst patients receiving spinal anaesthesia and those undergoing scheduled caesarean deliveries for a given QoR score. Quality of communication, interactions with staff and aspects of the postpartum physical environment were significant determinants of satisfaction and dissatisfaction.

Conclusion

Maternal satisfaction and obstetric QoR are distinct entities with a weak correlation between the two variables. Urgency of procedure and mode of anaesthesia are significant predictors of the correlation between satisfaction and quality of recovery scores. Many of the drivers of satisfaction were modifiable including quality of communication and a comfortable physical space for postpartum recovery.

Background

The dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique has been associated with better sacral analgesia compared with a traditional epidural (EPL) technique in laboring parturients. The aim of this study was to investigate whether DPE with a 27-gauge pencil-point needle compared with a traditional EPL technique produces more rapid bilateral sacral blockade in nulliparous parturients.

Methods

Patients were randomized to a DPE or EPL technique. Epidural analgesia in both groups was initiated with ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.5 μg/mL (15 mL) and maintained via programmed intermittent epidural boluses. Analgesic blockade was tested bilaterally beginning 10 min after initiation, and then at predefined intervals until delivery. The presence of an S2 blockade at 20 min was the primary outcome.

Results

Among 108 (54 per group) patients enrolled, bilateral sacral (S2) blockade at 20 min was significantly more common in the DPE than in the EPL group [47 (87%) vs. 23 (43%), absolute risk reduction (ARR) 44%, 95% CI 28 to 60; P < 0.001]. Time to a numeric pain rating scale score (0–10 scale) ≤ 3 (20 [20,30] min in both groups, HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.15; P = 0.50), number of rescue doses [0 (0, 1) vs 0 (0, 1); P 0.08], and presence of bilateral S2 blockade at delivery were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions

The DPE technique with a 27-gauge pencil-point spinal needle more often provides bilateral sacral blockade at 20 min following block initiation compared with the EPL technique. The time to adequate analgesia and need for supplemental analgesia did not appear to differ between techniques.

Background

Use of a programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) regimen during labour is associated with several benefits over a continuous epidural infusion (CEI), including reduced local anaesthetic consumption and reduced risk of motor block. We hypothesise that the benefits of a PIEB regimen may vary according to the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS). The aim of this study was to determine if introduction of a PIEB regimen was associated with reduced incidence of motor block. We also wished to examine changes in obstetric outcomes following PIEB introduction across the Robson TGCS.

Methods

This was a single-centre retrospective cohort study. Data were collected over two three-month periods before and after PIEB introduction. The primary outcome was the incidence of motor block. Maternal and obstetric outcomes across Robson Groups 1–4 were analysed.

Results

Introduction of PIEB was associated with reduced incidence of motor block (28.4% (95% CI 25.7% to 31.3%) vs 22.4%, (95% CI 19.9% to 25.2%), difference 5.9% (95% CI 1.0% to 21.1%), P=0.003), with no association with changes in rates of caesarean section, operative vaginal delivery or other obstetric outcomes. Use of a PIEB regimen was associated with reduced incidence of motor block in Robson Group 4a (20.3% (16.0%, 28.0%) vs 12.0%, (7.6%, 16.4%), difference 9.9% (95% CI −17.4% to −2.4%) P=0.009). There were no significant changes in other outcomes assessed across Robson TGCS.

Conclusion

Introduction of PIEB for maintenance of labour analgesia was associated with reduced incidence of motor block in our institution compared with CEI. Presenting results according to Robson’s TGCS in future studies may allow better elucidation of the impact of neuraxial analgesia on maternal and obstetric outcomes.