首页 > 最新文献

International journal of obstetric anesthesia最新文献

英文 中文
Comparison of erector spinae plane and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial. 比较竖脊肌平面和腹横肌平面阻滞在脊髓麻醉下剖腹产术后镇痛的效果:随机对照试验。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104259
A Eksteen, J Wagner, T Kleyenstuber, P Kamerman

Background: Truncal blocks contribute to multimodal analgesia that enhances early recovery after caesarean delivery. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an established technique that offers somatic abdominal wall analgesia. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a fascial plane technique that may offer additional visceral analgesic effects. This study hypothesized that ESP block would offer superior analgesic efficacy to TAP block in women undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia.

Methods: Sixty-six ASA physical status grade 1-3 (≥18 years) patients undergoing elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP (N = 33) or ESP blocks at the T9 vertebral level (N = 35). The primary outcome measure was 24-hour cumulative morphine consumption. The secondary outcomes included time to first analgesic request, duration of block placement, numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores at rest and movement, effect of pain on activities of daily living (ADLs) and care for the infant, patient analgesic satisfaction, frequency and severity of opioid-related side effects.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in mean (95% CI) 24-hour cumulative morphine consumption between groups: 32.0 (27.0 to 37.0) mg with TAP versus 27.0 (19.9 to 34.0) mg with ESP (p = 0.16). The mean (SD) duration of block placement was longer for ESP than for TAP blocks (10.7 (2.2) minutes versus 9.0 (2.5) minutes; p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: This study found similar postoperative opioid use and analgesic efficacy between ESP and TAP block after caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia.

Trial registration: South African National Clinical Trial Registry (DOH-27-102022-5278): https://sanctr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=8100, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202301645957324): https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=24267.

背景:截骨阻滞有助于多模式镇痛,从而促进剖腹产后的早期恢复。腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞是一种成熟的腹壁躯体镇痛技术。竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞是一种筋膜平面技术,可提供额外的内脏镇痛效果。本研究假设,在脊髓麻醉下进行剖腹产的产妇中,ESP阻滞的镇痛效果将优于TAP阻滞:66名ASA身体状况1-3级(≥18岁)的患者在脊髓麻醉下接受择期剖腹产,他们被随机分配接受双侧超声引导下TAP阻滞(33人)或T9椎体水平ESP阻滞(35人)。主要结果是24小时累积吗啡消耗量。次要结果包括首次镇痛请求的时间、阻滞放置的持续时间、静息和运动时的数字评分表(NRS)疼痛评分、疼痛对日常生活活动(ADL)和婴儿护理的影响、患者镇痛满意度、阿片类药物相关副作用的频率和严重程度:两组 24 小时累积吗啡用量的平均值(95% CI)差异无统计学意义:TAP 为 32.0(27.0 至 37.0)毫克,ESP 为 27.0(19.9 至 34.0)毫克(P = 0.16)。ESP阻滞的平均(标清)持续时间比 TAP 阻滞长(10.7 (2.2) 分钟对 9.0 (2.5) 分钟;p = 0.004)。其他次要结果无明显差异:这项研究发现,在脊髓麻醉下进行剖腹产后,ESP阻滞和TAP阻滞的术后阿片类药物使用量和镇痛效果相似:南非国家临床试验注册中心(DOH-27-102022-5278):https://sanctr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=8100,泛非临床试验注册中心(PACTR202301645957324):https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=24267。
{"title":"Comparison of erector spinae plane and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"A Eksteen, J Wagner, T Kleyenstuber, P Kamerman","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104259","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104259","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Truncal blocks contribute to multimodal analgesia that enhances early recovery after caesarean delivery. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an established technique that offers somatic abdominal wall analgesia. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a fascial plane technique that may offer additional visceral analgesic effects. This study hypothesized that ESP block would offer superior analgesic efficacy to TAP block in women undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six ASA physical status grade 1-3 (≥18 years) patients undergoing elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP (N = 33) or ESP blocks at the T9 vertebral level (N = 35). The primary outcome measure was 24-hour cumulative morphine consumption. The secondary outcomes included time to first analgesic request, duration of block placement, numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores at rest and movement, effect of pain on activities of daily living (ADLs) and care for the infant, patient analgesic satisfaction, frequency and severity of opioid-related side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in mean (95% CI) 24-hour cumulative morphine consumption between groups: 32.0 (27.0 to 37.0) mg with TAP versus 27.0 (19.9 to 34.0) mg with ESP (p = 0.16). The mean (SD) duration of block placement was longer for ESP than for TAP blocks (10.7 (2.2) minutes versus 9.0 (2.5) minutes; p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found similar postoperative opioid use and analgesic efficacy between ESP and TAP block after caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>South African National Clinical Trial Registry (DOH-27-102022-5278): https://sanctr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=8100, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202301645957324): https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=24267.</p>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142287207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to delivery in a pregnant patient with dilated cardiomyopathy and acute heart failure: a case report. 机械循环支持作为扩张型心肌病和急性心力衰竭孕妇分娩的桥梁:病例报告。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104261
M Phillips, L Bell, D Carroll, C Clark, C Hall, B Ramu, L Francis
{"title":"Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to delivery in a pregnant patient with dilated cardiomyopathy and acute heart failure: a case report.","authors":"M Phillips, L Bell, D Carroll, C Clark, C Hall, B Ramu, L Francis","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104261","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104261","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142287209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is the erector spinae plane block a solution for sacral sparing during neuraxial labor analgesia?: Comment on "Sacral sensory blockade from 27-gauge pencil-point dural puncture epidural analgesia or epidural analgesia in laboring nulliparous parturients: a randomized controlled trial". 竖脊肌平面阻滞是神经麻醉分娩镇痛中骶骨疏松的解决方案吗?对 "27 号铅笔尖硬膜外穿刺镇痛或硬膜外镇痛对无阴道产妇的骶骨感觉阻滞:随机对照试验 "的评论。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104263
Francesco Marrone, Carmine Pullano
{"title":"Is the erector spinae plane block a solution for sacral sparing during neuraxial labor analgesia?: Comment on \"Sacral sensory blockade from 27-gauge pencil-point dural puncture epidural analgesia or epidural analgesia in laboring nulliparous parturients: a randomized controlled trial\".","authors":"Francesco Marrone, Carmine Pullano","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104263","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142287208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to "Role of cosyntropin in the prevention of post-dural puncture headache: A propensity-matched retrospective analysis" [Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 56 (2023) 103922]. 对 "复方炔诺酮在预防硬膜穿刺后头痛中的作用:倾向匹配回顾性分析" [Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 56 (2023) 103922]。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104252
M Liu, A Mitchell, A Palanisamy, P M Singh
{"title":"Corrigendum to \"Role of cosyntropin in the prevention of post-dural puncture headache: A propensity-matched retrospective analysis\" [Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 56 (2023) 103922].","authors":"M Liu, A Mitchell, A Palanisamy, P M Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104252","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104252","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142107378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Novel approaches facilitating neuraxial anesthesia placement in pregnant women with morbid obesity: case descriptions 为病态肥胖孕妇实施神经麻醉提供便利的新方法:病例描述。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104257

Clinical management of pregnant women with morbid obesity poses challenges in performing neuraxial anesthesia as well as positioning for cesarean delivery. Occupational injuries are also known to occur while caring for patients with morbid obesity. We describe two novel approaches to assist neuraxial anesthesia administration and positioning for cesarean delivery. With the assistance of the Institution’s Safe Patient Handling and Mobility Team, a universal high-back sling can be placed to lift the patient into a sitting position before neuraxial anesthesia procedure. After placement of combined spinal epidural anesthesia, the ceiling lift is used to lift the patient into a seated position and then rotate to the appropriate location on the operating room table to facilitate supine positioning. The lifting system reduces shearing of the patient’s posterior and compromising the epidural site. Team members also report reduced effort required when positioning patients from seated to supine on the operating room table. The second approach is the application of TraxiTM abdominal pannus retractor to retract fat folds encroaching on the epidural placement site in pregnant women with morbid obesity. This is particularly useful when the traditional taping of fat folds away from the site is inadequate. The pannus retractor results in a flatter surface facilitating epidural placement. We have introduced these two approaches into our clinical practice for pregnant women with morbid obesity requiring cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia.

对病态肥胖孕妇的临床管理给神经麻醉和剖宫产定位带来了挑战。众所周知,在护理病态肥胖症患者时也会发生职业伤害。我们介绍了两种辅助神经麻醉和剖宫产定位的新方法。在该机构的 "病人安全搬运和移动小组 "的协助下,可以在进行神经麻醉前放置一个通用的高靠背吊衣,将病人抬至坐位。在实施脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉后,使用天花板移位机将病人移至坐位,然后旋转到手术室手术台上的适当位置,以方便病人仰卧。该移位系统可减少对患者后部的剪切和对硬膜外部位的损害。团队成员还报告说,在手术室手术台上将病人从坐位移至仰卧位时,所需的体力也有所减少。第二种方法是应用 TraxiTM 腹部脓肿牵开器,牵开病态肥胖孕妇硬膜外置入部位的脂肪褶皱。当传统的用胶带将脂肪褶皱从置放部位牵开的方法不够有效时,这种方法尤其有用。脂肪团牵引器可使硬膜外置入部位表面更平整。我们已将这两种方法引入临床实践,用于需要在神经麻醉下进行剖宫产的病态肥胖孕妇。
{"title":"Novel approaches facilitating neuraxial anesthesia placement in pregnant women with morbid obesity: case descriptions","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104257","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104257","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Clinical management of pregnant women with morbid obesity poses challenges in performing neuraxial anesthesia as well as positioning for cesarean delivery. Occupational injuries are also known to occur while caring for patients with morbid obesity. We describe two novel approaches to assist neuraxial anesthesia administration and positioning for cesarean delivery. With the assistance of the Institution’s Safe Patient Handling and Mobility Team, a universal high-back sling can be placed to lift the patient into a sitting position before neuraxial anesthesia procedure. After placement of combined spinal epidural anesthesia, the ceiling lift is used to lift the patient into a seated position and then rotate to the appropriate location on the operating room table to facilitate supine positioning. The lifting system reduces shearing of the patient’s posterior and compromising the epidural site. Team members also report reduced effort required when positioning patients from seated to supine on the operating room table. The second approach is the application of Traxi<sup>TM</sup> abdominal pannus retractor to retract fat folds encroaching on the epidural placement site in pregnant women with morbid obesity. This is particularly useful when the traditional taping of fat folds away from the site is inadequate. The pannus retractor results in a flatter surface facilitating epidural placement. We have introduced these two approaches into our clinical practice for pregnant women with morbid obesity requiring cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142145643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dysfibrinogenaemia and caesarean delivery: a case report. 纤维蛋白原血症与剖腹产:一份病例报告。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104254
C Dunn, J Coventry, S Lewis, E Buchanan
{"title":"Dysfibrinogenaemia and caesarean delivery: a case report.","authors":"C Dunn, J Coventry, S Lewis, E Buchanan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104254","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142145644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion versus treatment with vasopressor bolus as needed during non-urgent cesarean delivery and neonatal acidemia: a retrospective cohort study (2016–2021) 非急诊剖宫产和新生儿酸血症期间预防性输注苯肾上腺素与根据需要使用血管加压药栓治疗的对比:一项回顾性队列研究(2016-2021年)
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104253

Introduction

Prophylactic vasopressor administration reduces spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery, however the effects of vasopressor administration on neonatal acidemia remain uncertain. We examined the occurrence of neonatal acidemia in the setting of non-urgent cesarean delivery and compared outcomes between cases receiving prophylactic phenylephrine infusion versus cases treated with boluses of phenylephrine.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study with ethical approval, comparing non-urgent cesarean delivery cases performed under spinal anesthesia (2016 to 2021), receiving either prophylactic phenylephrine infusion or boluses as needed.

Data were collected from anesthesia and labor ward electronic medical records. Records with missing pH or missing blood pressure data were excluded. The independent variable was prophylactic phenylephrine administration, a strategy implemented following international recommendations in 2018. The main outcome was neonatal acidemia, defined as umbilical artery pH < 7.1. The secondary outcome was maternal hypotension, defined as at least one systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurement below 100 mmHg or below 80% baseline.

Results

A total of 4392 patients were included in the final analysis; 1318 (30.0%) received prophylactic phenylephrine infusion. Neonatal acidemia (umbilical artery pH < 7.1) occurred in 28 (2.1%) cases receiving prophylactic phenylephrine versus 50 (1.6%) treated with boluses as needed (p = 0.188). Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was not associated with occurrence of neonatal acidemia (aOR 0.83; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.33, p = 0.435). Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was associated with a reduced spinal hypotension rate when defined as SBP < 100 mmHg (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.57; p < 0.001), with similar results when hypotension was defined as a drop below 80% or 90% of baseline SBP.

Conclusion

In this pragmatic study, prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was associated with a reduction in maternal spinal hypotension, but not reduced neonatal acidemia.

导言:预防性使用血管加压素可降低剖宫产过程中的脊柱低血压,但血管加压素对新生儿酸血症的影响仍不确定。我们研究了非急诊剖宫产情况下新生儿酸血症的发生率,并比较了预防性输注苯肾上腺素与苯肾上腺素栓剂治疗病例的结果。方法经伦理批准的回顾性队列研究,比较了在脊髓麻醉下进行的非急诊剖宫产病例(2016 年至 2021 年),接受预防性输注苯肾上腺素或根据需要栓剂治疗的病例。pH值或血压数据缺失的记录被排除在外。自变量为预防性注射苯肾上腺素,这是2018年根据国际建议实施的一项策略。主要结果是新生儿酸血症,定义为脐动脉 pH < 7.1。次要结果是产妇低血压,定义为至少一次收缩压(SBP)测量值低于 100 mmHg 或低于 80% 基线。结果共有 4392 例患者纳入最终分析;1318 例(30.0%)接受了预防性输注苯肾上腺素。接受预防性苯肾上腺素治疗的新生儿中有 28 例(2.1%)出现新生儿酸血症(脐动脉 pH 值为 7.1),而接受按需注入苯肾上腺素治疗的新生儿中有 50 例(1.6%)出现新生儿酸血症(p = 0.188)。预防性输注苯肾上腺素与新生儿酸血症的发生无关(aOR 0.83;95% CI 0.52 至 1.33,p = 0.435)。当定义为 SBP < 100 mmHg 时,预防性输注苯肾上腺素与脊柱低血压发生率降低有关(OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.57; p <0.001),当低血压定义为低于基线 SBP 的 80% 或 90% 时,结果类似。
{"title":"Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion versus treatment with vasopressor bolus as needed during non-urgent cesarean delivery and neonatal acidemia: a retrospective cohort study (2016–2021)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104253","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104253","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Prophylactic vasopressor administration reduces spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery, however the effects of vasopressor administration on neonatal acidemia remain uncertain. We examined the occurrence of neonatal acidemia in the setting of non-urgent cesarean delivery and compared outcomes between cases receiving prophylactic phenylephrine infusion versus cases treated with boluses of phenylephrine.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study with ethical approval, comparing non-urgent cesarean delivery cases performed under spinal anesthesia (2016 to 2021), receiving either prophylactic phenylephrine infusion or boluses as needed.</p><p>Data were collected from anesthesia and labor ward electronic medical records. Records with missing pH or missing blood pressure data were excluded. The independent variable was prophylactic phenylephrine administration, a strategy implemented following international recommendations in 2018. The main outcome was neonatal acidemia, defined as umbilical artery pH &lt; 7.1. The secondary outcome was maternal hypotension, defined as at least one systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurement below 100 mmHg or below 80% baseline.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 4392 patients were included in the final analysis; 1318 (30.0%) received prophylactic phenylephrine infusion. Neonatal acidemia (umbilical artery pH &lt; 7.1) occurred in 28 (2.1%) cases receiving prophylactic phenylephrine versus 50 (1.6%) treated with boluses as needed (p = 0.188). Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was not associated with occurrence of neonatal acidemia (aOR 0.83; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.33, p = 0.435). Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was associated with a reduced spinal hypotension rate when defined as SBP &lt; 100 mmHg (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.57; p &lt; 0.001), with similar results when hypotension was defined as a drop below 80% or 90% of baseline SBP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this pragmatic study, prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was associated with a reduction in maternal spinal hypotension, but not reduced neonatal acidemia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X24002656/pdfft?md5=3df0452f6e4eebfe2f10417d6cb58e9e&pid=1-s2.0-S0959289X24002656-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142162110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery is likely more common than we think: A commentary in response to "Pain during caesarean delivery in a tertiary maternity hospital: a retrospective cohort study (2022-2023)". 剖宫产术中疼痛可能比我们想象的更常见:针对 "一家三级妇产医院剖腹产时的疼痛:一项回顾性队列研究(2022-2023 年)"的评论。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104256
M P Hofkamp, B Kohl-Thomas, E E Sharpe
{"title":"Intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery is likely more common than we think: A commentary in response to \"Pain during caesarean delivery in a tertiary maternity hospital: a retrospective cohort study (2022-2023)\".","authors":"M P Hofkamp, B Kohl-Thomas, E E Sharpe","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104256","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142107380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Upper back, neck, and shoulder pain during labor epidural analgesia: a quality improvement initiative 分娩硬膜外镇痛期间的上背部、颈部和肩部疼痛:质量改进倡议
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104255

Background

Severe upper back/interscapular, neck and shoulder pain during labor epidural analgesia (PLEA) is not uncommon. The objective of this quality initiative was to evaluate the incidence, demographic associations and management of PLEA.

Methods

An eight-month, single-center quality improvement initiative was performed for the detection and management of PLEA. After survey-based consensus among obstetric anaesthetist attendings and fellows, a three-step PLEA treatment protocol with interventions and numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 – 10 scale) pain assessments was introduced. Demographic data and outcomes were compared among parturients with and without PLEA.

Results

Among 2888 women who received labor epidural analgesia from October 2022 through May 2023, 36 (1.2% [95% CI 0.9% to 1.7%]) reported PLEA. Women with PLEA were younger, more likely to be nulliparous, and had a higher body mass index (BMI) than women without PLEA (p < 0.05 for all). A total of 72.2% (26/36) of women with PLEA received at least one protocol treatment. Twenty-three women received first-line therapy, with pain relief in 91.3% (21/23). The median NRS score decreased from 9 [IQR 8–10] to 3 [1–4]. Women with PLEA had a higher incidence of cesarean delivery (CD) and a longer interval between epidural placement and delivery; 52.8 vs. 17.5% (p < 0.001) and 16.5 vs. 6.9 hours (p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

The incidence of PLEA was higher than previously reported. Patients with PLEA were younger, more commonly nulliparous, had higher BMI, longer epidural infusion times and higher CD rates. A three-step treatment protocol was successful in managing PLEA.

背景分娩硬膜外镇痛(PLEA)期间出现严重的上背部/肩胛骨内侧、颈部和肩部疼痛并不少见。方法针对 PLEA 的检测和管理开展了一项为期 8 个月的单中心质量改进计划。在产科麻醉师主治医师和研究员之间通过调查达成共识后,引入了三步 PLEA 治疗方案,包括干预措施和数字评分法(NRS,0 - 10 分制)疼痛评估。结果在 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 5 月期间接受分娩硬膜外镇痛的 2888 名产妇中,有 36 人(1.2% [95% CI 0.9% 至 1.7%])报告了 PLEA。与无 PLEA 的女性相比,有 PLEA 的女性更年轻,更有可能是单胎,体重指数(BMI)也更高(均为 p < 0.05)。共有72.2%(26/36)的PLEA女性接受了至少一种方案治疗。23名女性接受了一线治疗,91.3%(21/23)的患者疼痛得到缓解。NRS评分中位数从9[IQR 8-10]降至3[1-4]。PLEA患者的剖宫产(CD)发生率更高,硬膜外置管与分娩之间的间隔时间更长;分别为52.8%对17.5%(p <0.001)和16.5小时对6.9小时(p <0.001)。PLEA患者更年轻、更常见于无子宫、体重指数更高、硬膜外输注时间更长、CD率更高。三步治疗方案可成功控制 PLEA。
{"title":"Upper back, neck, and shoulder pain during labor epidural analgesia: a quality improvement initiative","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104255","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104255","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Severe upper back/interscapular, neck and shoulder pain during labor epidural analgesia (PLEA) is not uncommon. The objective of this quality initiative was to evaluate the incidence, demographic associations and management of PLEA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An eight-month, single-center quality improvement initiative was performed for the detection and management of PLEA. After survey-based consensus among obstetric anaesthetist attendings and fellows, a three-step PLEA treatment protocol with interventions and numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 – 10 scale) pain assessments was introduced. Demographic data and outcomes were compared among parturients with and without PLEA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 2888 women who received labor epidural analgesia from October 2022 through May 2023, 36 (1.2% [95% CI 0.9% to 1.7%]) reported PLEA. Women with PLEA were younger, more likely to be nulliparous, and had a higher body mass index (BMI) than women without PLEA (p &lt; 0.05 for all). A total of 72.2% (26/36) of women with PLEA received at least one protocol treatment. Twenty-three women received first-line therapy, with pain relief in 91.3% (21/23). The median NRS score decreased from 9 [IQR 8–10] to 3 [1–4]. Women with PLEA had a higher incidence of cesarean delivery (CD) and a longer interval between epidural placement and delivery; 52.8 vs. 17.5% (p &lt; 0.001) and 16.5 vs. 6.9 hours (p &lt; 0.001), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The incidence of PLEA was higher than previously reported. Patients with PLEA were younger, more commonly nulliparous, had higher BMI, longer epidural infusion times and higher CD rates. A three-step treatment protocol was successful in managing PLEA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X2400267X/pdfft?md5=fcf67ff95adae35953c3cfbec520e257&pid=1-s2.0-S0959289X2400267X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142162109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Obstetric anesthesia management of dilated cardiomyopathies and heart failure: a narrative review 扩张型心肌病和心力衰竭的产科麻醉管理:综述
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104251

Pregnancy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy carries a significantly increased risk of maternal mortality or severe morbidity, and pregnancy is typically considered contraindicated for patients with severely reduced ventricular function. Nonetheless, anesthesiologists will still encounter patients with cardiomyopathy requiring delivery or termination care. This review describes how NT-ProBNP testing and echocardiography can help with early recognition of heart failure in pregnancy, and describes a suggested approach to anesthetic management of patients with cardiomyopathies or acute heart failure, including hemodynamic goals, use of vasoactive medications and mechanical support. Vaginal delivery, with effective neuraxial anesthesia is the preferred mode of delivery in most patients with cardiomyopathy, with cesarean delivery reserved for maternal or fetal indications. The Pregnancy Heart Team is vital in coordinating the multidisciplinary care necessary to safely support these patients through pregnancy.

扩张型心肌病患者怀孕会显著增加孕产妇死亡或严重发病的风险,而且心室功能严重减退的患者通常被视为禁忌怀孕。尽管如此,麻醉医师仍会遇到需要分娩或终止妊娠护理的心肌病患者。本综述介绍了 NT-ProBNP 检测和超声心动图如何帮助早期识别妊娠期心力衰竭,并介绍了对心肌病或急性心力衰竭患者进行麻醉管理的建议方法,包括血液动力学目标、血管活性药物的使用和机械支持。阴道分娩和有效的神经麻醉是大多数心肌病患者的首选分娩方式,剖宫产仅适用于母体或胎儿适应症。妊娠心脏病小组在协调必要的多学科护理以安全支持这些患者度过妊娠期方面至关重要。
{"title":"Obstetric anesthesia management of dilated cardiomyopathies and heart failure: a narrative review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104251","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104251","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pregnancy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy carries a significantly increased risk of maternal mortality or severe morbidity, and pregnancy is typically considered contraindicated for patients with severely reduced ventricular function. Nonetheless, anesthesiologists will still encounter patients with cardiomyopathy requiring delivery or termination care. This review describes how NT-ProBNP testing and echocardiography can help with early recognition of heart failure in pregnancy, and describes a suggested approach to anesthetic management of patients with cardiomyopathies or acute heart failure, including hemodynamic goals, use of vasoactive medications and mechanical support. Vaginal delivery, with effective neuraxial anesthesia is the preferred mode of delivery in most patients with cardiomyopathy, with cesarean delivery reserved for maternal or fetal indications. The Pregnancy Heart Team is vital in coordinating the multidisciplinary care necessary to safely support these patients through pregnancy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142122195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International journal of obstetric anesthesia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1