International Journal of Social Research Methodology最新文献

英文中文

Reflecting on research at the interface of knowledge and the importance of decolonising transformational unlearning for non-Indigenous researchers 反思知识界面的研究和非土著研究人员非殖民化转型遗忘的重要性

3区社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2023.2269027

Emma George

ABSTRACTDecolonising methodology requires that researchers engage in a process of learning and unlearning. This research on the inconsistent recognition of Indigenous rights and social determinants of Indigenous health in Australian policy implementation was positioned at the interface of knowledge systems and drew on a weaving metaphor to guide reflection on learning and unlearning. The aim of this paper is to share a reflection on this research methodology from a non-Indigenous standpoint. Reflexivity, deep listening, peer mentoring and supervision are identified as essential components of decolonising methodology. Through the process of weaving, both practically and philosophically, the significance of transformational unlearning is discussed. This reflection is offered as an example to other non-Indigenous researchers who are open to the challenge of decolonising research at the interface of knowledge.KEYWORDS: Reflectiondecolonising methodologyinterface of knowledgeweaving AcknowledgmentsThis research was conducted on the traditional land of the Kaurna people of the Adelaide Plains and on the land of the Yorta Yorta and Bangerang people of the Greater Shepparton region. The Author pays respect to Elders past and present, and acknowledges the contribution, insight and wisdom of all of the participants in this research. The author acknowledges the support and guidance received from PhD supervisors, Professor Fran Baum, Associate Professor Tamara Mackean, and Dr Matt Fisher, along with critical friends, Dr Courtney Ryder and Mr Tirritpa Ritchie.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in the Social Determinants of Health Equity: policy research on the social determinants of health equity (APP1078046). The author received a PhD scholarship funded by the NHMRC which was topped up by Flinders University.Notes on contributorsEmma GeorgeAssociate Professor Emma George is an occupational therapist with a PhD in public health. Her research explores ways to address health inequities among marginalised people with a commitment to social and occupational justice. Her research focuses on national policy implementation, the health and well-being of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities, and recovery from exploitation and modern slavery in Australia and India. She is the Program Director for Occupational Therapy at the University of Adelaide

【摘要】非殖民化方法论要求研究者参与一个学习和放弃学习的过程。这项关于在澳大利亚政策实施中对土著权利和土著健康的社会决定因素的不一致承认的研究定位于知识系统的界面，并利用编织隐喻来指导对学习和放弃学习的反思。本文的目的是分享从非土著立场对这一研究方法的反思。反思、深度倾听、同伴指导和监督被认为是非殖民化方法的重要组成部分。通过编织的过程，从实践和哲学两个方面探讨了转型遗忘的意义。这一反思为其他非土著研究人员提供了一个例子，他们愿意在知识界面上接受非殖民化研究的挑战。本研究在阿德莱德平原考尔纳人(Kaurna)的传统土地和大谢普顿地区约塔约塔人(Yorta Yorta)和Bangerang人的土地上进行。作者对过去和现在的长者表示敬意，并对所有参与这项研究的人的贡献、洞察力和智慧表示感谢。作者感谢博士导师Fran Baum教授、Tamara Mackean副教授和Matt Fisher博士以及重要的朋友Courtney Ryder博士和Tirritpa Ritchie先生的支持和指导。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。这项工作得到了NHMRC健康公平的社会决定因素卓越研究中心的支持:健康公平的社会决定因素政策研究(APP1078046)。作者获得了由NHMRC资助的博士奖学金，并由弗林德斯大学充值。副教授Emma George是一名职业治疗师，拥有公共卫生博士学位。她的研究探索了如何解决边缘化人群的健康不平等问题，并致力于社会和职业正义。她的研究重点是国家政策的实施，土著和托雷斯海峡岛民和社区的健康和福祉，以及澳大利亚和印度的剥削和现代奴隶制的恢复。她是阿德莱德大学职业治疗项目主任

{"title":"Reflecting on research at the interface of knowledge and the importance of decolonising transformational unlearning for non-Indigenous researchers","authors":"Emma George","doi":"10.1080/13645579.2023.2269027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2023.2269027","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDecolonising methodology requires that researchers engage in a process of learning and unlearning. This research on the inconsistent recognition of Indigenous rights and social determinants of Indigenous health in Australian policy implementation was positioned at the interface of knowledge systems and drew on a weaving metaphor to guide reflection on learning and unlearning. The aim of this paper is to share a reflection on this research methodology from a non-Indigenous standpoint. Reflexivity, deep listening, peer mentoring and supervision are identified as essential components of decolonising methodology. Through the process of weaving, both practically and philosophically, the significance of transformational unlearning is discussed. This reflection is offered as an example to other non-Indigenous researchers who are open to the challenge of decolonising research at the interface of knowledge.KEYWORDS: Reflectiondecolonising methodologyinterface of knowledgeweaving AcknowledgmentsThis research was conducted on the traditional land of the Kaurna people of the Adelaide Plains and on the land of the Yorta Yorta and Bangerang people of the Greater Shepparton region. The Author pays respect to Elders past and present, and acknowledges the contribution, insight and wisdom of all of the participants in this research. The author acknowledges the support and guidance received from PhD supervisors, Professor Fran Baum, Associate Professor Tamara Mackean, and Dr Matt Fisher, along with critical friends, Dr Courtney Ryder and Mr Tirritpa Ritchie.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in the Social Determinants of Health Equity: policy research on the social determinants of health equity (APP1078046). The author received a PhD scholarship funded by the NHMRC which was topped up by Flinders University.Notes on contributorsEmma GeorgeAssociate Professor Emma George is an occupational therapist with a PhD in public health. Her research explores ways to address health inequities among marginalised people with a commitment to social and occupational justice. Her research focuses on national policy implementation, the health and well-being of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities, and recovery from exploitation and modern slavery in Australia and India. She is the Program Director for Occupational Therapy at the University of Adelaide","PeriodicalId":14272,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136114002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Remote data collection in sociolinguistics: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic 社会语言学中的远程数据收集:来自COVID-19大流行的教训

3区社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2023.2265257

Annina Heini, Krzysztof Kredens

This article reports on our experience of collecting language data from informants in video-conferencing settings under a research design originally developed with face-to-face interactions in mind. We had set out to investigate whether individual stylistic features persist in different modes of textual production and designed a complex set of data-collection procedures, which we then adopted for use in a fully virtual environment with 112 informants, who were asked to provide language samples in eight discourse types. We conclude that the unintended shift to virtual settings had only a minimal impact on the volume and quality of the data. While the process was occasionally afflicted by IT-related technical issues and made extra demands on the data collector, it also created opportunities, notably around the management of interactional power asymmetries. Additional benefits included instant troubleshooting during data handover sessions and the ability to recruit participants who would not have been able to travel to face-to-face sessions.

本文报告了我们在视频会议环境下从举报人那里收集语言数据的经验，这种研究设计最初是考虑到面对面的互动而开发的。我们已经着手调查个人风格特征是否在不同的文本生产模式中持续存在，并设计了一套复杂的数据收集程序，然后我们采用该程序在一个完全虚拟的环境中与112名告密者一起使用，他们被要求提供八种话语类型的语言样本。我们得出的结论是，无意中转向虚拟设置对数据的数量和质量只有最小的影响。虽然这个过程偶尔会受到与it相关的技术问题的影响，并对数据收集器提出额外的要求，但它也创造了机会，特别是在管理交互权力不对称方面。其他好处包括在数据移交会议期间进行即时故障排除，以及能够招募无法前往参加面对面会议的参与者。

引用次数: 0

Selective Dissociation of Retrospective and Prospective Memory Due to Decline of Cognitive Function : Comparison Between The Normal Elderly and The Elderly with Mild Cognitive Impairment 认知功能衰退导致的回顾性和前瞻性记忆选择性分离:正常老年人与轻度认知障碍老年人的比较